Input rule for Calcuate account

Hello All,
Please help me in the below scenario
I have an account(A/c # 50001), Is Calculate is enabled for this account in metadata.
I would like to manually input data for this account only for 2012.
I have written the below script and try to test it, but it not working.
Sub Input()
HS.Input "A#50001.Y#2012"
End Sub
Your quick response greatly appreciated
Thanks & regards

"IsCalculate" prevents all manual data entry for an account. Sub NoInput() prevents manual data entry for specific intersections. I think Sub Input() only enables manual input for upper level entities (eg prior to an allocation rule)
Therefore to enable entry to an account for one year only you would need to clear the IsCalculate property for the account and write NoInput() rules for every year other than 2012. NoInput rules can be included in a conditional statement or Loop

Similar Messages

Need help with Rules for mail accounts

Today I deleted a rule for a mail account and now I cant receive mail in 4 of 8 accounts. I'm not experienced with Mac's Mail program. Id there something you have to do for multiple accounts to recieve all mail? I can send but not receive.
Help!
~ Tammy

It's hard to believe that deleting a rule could have a bearing on the ability to receive messages from any account... unless that rule did something that prevented subsequent rules to process the messages that you apparently can't receive now.
That is, either having deleted the rule has absolutely no bearing on your problem, or the problem is that those messages are now being processed in an unexpected way by some of your other rules.
What type of accounts are these (POP, IMAP, .Mac)? What does "I cant receive mail in 4 of 8 accounts" mean?

Input layout for Guest Account

Please gave me some help.
I need change the default input layout for the guest account.
In Italy we have two keyboard:
Italian and Italian Pro
Now guest begin with Italian Keyboard layout but now we have Italian Pro Keyboard.
Yes I no that the guest can change in Preference but after log out the next logIn is more the wrong Italian.
Very boring. I will change the setting one time forever.
We dont have more keyboard with Italian layout (too old).
Thanks for your help and sorry for my very bad english.

Thanks for the advice but these were the roads that I had tried before looking in the forum.
I have try again.
sudo "/System/Library/CoreServices/Language Chooser.app/Contents/MacOS/Language Chooser"
sudo "/System/Library/CoreServices/Setup Assistant.app/Contents/MacOS/Setup Assistant"
Workgroup Manager from Server Admin Tools
Unfortunately all of these approaches dont work.
they can not change the keyboard layout.
I found also this
http://discussions.apple.com/messageview.jspa?messageID=13288615&stqc=true
that is almost the same
but unfortunately no answer.
Surely it is written in a file system preference ... but where?
P.S. Tom you live in Flagstaff, very nice. I was there this summer with my family - wife and son - and was the third time in my life.
I like very much Arizona, and new mexico, and Colarado, Utha…
maybe I love all the west with a rent car on the road ... maybe all the USA.

Rules for Mail Accounts

Can different accounts in mail.app have rules that are specific to that account? It seems that when I create a rule it applies globally to all accounts.

One of the options in the "If" portion of the rules is Account, so yes, you can limit a rule a specific account.

Substitution rule for gl account text field in line item.

Hi
We have intercompany postings made for a no.range of GL accounts ex: 1000-1999.When ever this accounts are getting posted ,i.e the accounting doc,need to make substitution such that what ever the description is given in the offsetting entry(ex: vendor 10000 - Material vendor ) for this GL in the accounting doc should come in the text field .
I want the description of the vendor account to be inb the text field in the line item of the gl account.Is it possible thru substitution.If so how.
Please advise.

Thanks for all your replies.
I Want the field BSEG- KOBEZ i.e description field in the accounting doc of the offsetting entry to be replaced in the GL account text field.
Ex :
PK    Account        Description                  Amount           Text
31    100000         Furniture Vendor             50             Sales
40    1999             Inter Compy                     50             Furniture Vendor
I want the description of offsetting entry vendor description i.e Furniture vendor (field BSEG-KOBEZ) to be replaced in GL line item text BSEG-SGTXT.
I cant find the field BSEG- KOBEZ while i search in the substituion to replace in Text field.
How do i write in substitution to say that the offsetting entry description should be in text field of GL account.

How to Block Account member in input reporting for some users?

Hi experts, i need to know if is possible to block input of values for some Users in the Account Dimension so that some users can input value in the report but other user cant do it.
I try to do this from "member access profile" but this option only allow you to define access right for one specifict parent o member.
I mean, is posible to asigned to Account Dimension a Propertie type "OWNER" like ENTITY?
For example: one user must to input value for the Account member "CASH", but other user dont, however i have to show the same input reporting for both users.
I hope understand the question, im sorry about my english
thank you in advance
Ignacio Vazquez

I would think you could do one of the following:
Either set account as a secured dimension. You would then define security profiles for all account groups and assign those to your users / teams as appropriate. Would take a while to setup initially, but if your users don't change that much it shouldn't be too difficult to manage once it's done.
Setup different input templates that only showed the accounts you wanted each group of users to see. Put the templates in different site folders and assign access to those sites as required. users would then only have access to open the template applicable to them. Would require that you basically make duplicate copies or your current template, modify and save to different site folders which could become a pain if the template requires changes (since you would now have to make the same change multiple times).
Setup a macro in the current template so that you need to enter a password to unlock the send commands for the respective accounts. I don't know if it can be setup to support multiple passwords - assuming it can, password 1 would unlock all accounts, password 2 would only unlock CASH accounts, password 3 would only unlock LIABILITY accounts, etc. You then distribute the passwords to the users as appropriate.
Hope that helps.

Does Firefox respect user account control rules for windows xp sp3, anything to do specifically to enable that ?

xp sp3
1.5g R / 2.46g P4
<u>edit information copied from System Info troubleshooting: </u>
More Information
*1)Does Firefox latest version obey/confirm to the rules for user account control for windows xp sp3 ?
* 2)Need I do anything specific at the time of installation and/or setting up/configuring preferences ?
*3)Or do I need to install Firefox separately for the limited users or in each users account ?
*4)Would it be possible/desirable/necessary to install it directly into some folder of the user other than the common program files folder ?
*5)In any of these situations, should I or should I not make the installation with 'Run As' admin privilege.
*6)If I install separately for the user/s, with/without admin privileges, will the install write to , or enable user activity to write to, the other common windows folders(where user write is otherwise disallowed).
Please kindly clarify. I am waiting for an answer before I reinstall Firefox and a lot of other apps(these were done earlier before creating the user accounts. Please note that I do not mind installing separately for any/all users. But security will be my preference as much as possible(PARANOIA). I am having to deal with a couple of users who cant understand all this and the folks are too old to understand.
Thanking you in anticipation
neoser
------------

A far as I recall from when I did use XP the procedure was to install Firefox using an Admin account, preferably the Administrator account.
By doing that the Firefox installer would create Firefox within the programs directory. And each separate user account could then use Firefox. Importantly each user account has a Firefox profile and so have their own separate and individual bookmarks, cookies, passwords, cache etc.
IIRC UAC was not available for XP. Permissions and what you could do would also differ; I seem to remember; depending on whether it was using FAT or NTFS. In some setups a knowledgeable admin account user could probably fully access any other account.

[SOLVED] how to use diffrent iptables rules for different ppp account?

x86 plantform run arch linux system , have two network interface etn1 eth0 .eth1 connect to internet. eth0 connect to other terminals through switch. want use different iptables rules for different pppoe account .also want to know how to forbidden more than one terminals established pppoe link use same account at the same time .
Last edited by linuxsir (2013-09-26 06:48:01)

(You establish PPPoE sessions over the local network to the Arch machine? Which then routes the traffic?)
first question ,yes that is exactly what i am done. second question i also have a small scripts on windows pc to solve routes traffic problem
route -p delete 0.0.0.0
route -p add 192.168.9.0 mask 255.255.255.0 192.168.9.1
route -p add 0.0.0.0 mask 0.0.0.0 192.168.22.0
but after a while i found scripts is not necessary because windows always attempt to use PPPoE sessions as default internet connection local connection is also ok
and use -i pppX in my iptables rules dose not solve my problem , because same account start PPPoE session could be marked as ppp0 or ppp1. it is hard to identified which account start session.

Validation Rule for Accounting Document type

Hello Experts
I have an requirement to block certain accounting doc type to get vendor line item post in that. For that I tried to block direct through OBA7 but not be able to also can't delete number range as it is shared by another doc type. My last option is Validation rule but i never work on this ,so any suggest how to create validation rule " To Block Accounting Doc type SO THAT THERE WILL NOT BE ANY line item posting occur in that doc type.
Regards.

ok sure. OB28 callpoint 1. Create a step under this callpoint.
1) Prerequisite is as follows: note XXXX is your company code and ZZ is your doc type.
BKPF-BUKRS = 'XXXX' AND
BKPF-BLART = 'ZZ'
2) Then you need to enter the check. Here you can just put FALSE.
3) The last part is to create your message. Message type E so they get an error and then create a message number in the class that you choose and give it a description:
Document Type 'ZZ' is not allowed
Save it and wah lah!
Let me know how it goes.
Thanks,
Jes

Payment program rules for selecting Bank accounts

Hi !!
Anyone that know the rules for payment program to select Vendor Bank accounts from XK03
when
- more then one row exist in Vendor bank accounts (XK03)
and
- Field Partner bank type is "blank" (LFBK-BVTYP) for all bank account rows
The rules seems not to be crystal clear for me
Any place to find more documentation about these rules especially when LFBK-BVTYP is "blank"
Thanks in advance !!
BR Tomas Hagberg

Hi,
Please refer to following link. This may help.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/47/8bf634b576bc4ee10000009b38f83b/frameset.htm
Regards,
Harish

Posting rules for account key

friends
please i am trying to post into a G/L and got this error message "No posting rules have been defined for the account key in the tax table in table T007B"
please how do i resolve this i am new into FI
thanks in advance

Hi,
T007B is maintained via OBCN transaction.
Regards,
Eli

Business Rules for Account Transformation - Execute a Transformation Group

Hello,
when executing a package for account transformation, I want to select a specific transformation group
only.
The transformation group is the first column in the definitions.
My question:
Can I pass this to script logic as a parameter?
What is it like?
I think this should have a performance effect when using account transformation in default logic.
Thanks for an answer
Jochen

Hi Jochen,
Your best bet is the documentation at [http://help.sap.com/saphelp_bpc75_nw/helpdata/en/2b/8f059920de465b88be2893e2117fbe/frameset.htm], however in this case it does not do a very good job of explaining what is happening. Fortunately the CALC= property is just about the only one that you have control over for the account transformation business rules.
The other option (and the only way to truly know what is going on) is to investigate the ABAP programs that actually execute the business rule logic in BW. You can find these programs in SE80, under the UJ package, in the UJP sub-package. You will be most interested in the classes available there. There tends to be one class per business rule group, as well as classes for allocations and validations.
Cheers,
Ethan

Maintain settlement rules for order category 30(Maintenance order).

Hi Gurus,
Can we maintain two settlement rules for an order without distribution rule?
Eample:- In an order there are three different costs i.e. material cost,external labour cost and internal labour cost.We want to settle the material cost and external labour cost to Profitability segment and the internal cost to a particular GL account directly.
Note: No distribution rule is required,because all the cost should settle directly to correspoanding heads i.e. PSG or GL.We don't want to assign the GL# again and again for different orders in the corresponding order's settlement rule.
Require your valuable inputs to proceed.
Best Regards,
Ramakanta

Hi Govardhan,
If you are working in ECS, the Shopping cart will not create any follow on document in backend R/3.
I think your Product category is 30, thats why the error says Manual reservation for order category 30 is not allowed.
Where did you get the maintenance order? Generally maintenance order is created in the backend R/3 (Plant Maintenance) and a P.R will get generated against that order.
Using PDP (Plan driven procurement) you can transfer that P.R to SRM and can carry out sourcing and can complete the procurement cycle.
Can you please tell me what is your exact business requirement?
Hope this will make you more clear.
Clarifications are welcome.
Award points for helpful answers.
Rgds,
Teja

Need quantitative as well as amount data for an account member

Requirement of the report is that for an account dimension member, there needs to be quatity, amount as well as a ratio in a single line along with the unit for the quantity (which i will keep in the custom dim).
Is this possible.. what are the ways i can handle this?
i was thinking of creating two scenarios.. one for the quantity data and the other for the amount data... will this work? i will calculate the ratio at the report level (smart view)
please help me with your thoughts.
Many thanks,
anji.

Hi anji,
One possibility is to turn the structure around, by using a custom member as your report row and use different accounts to input your quantity, value and ratio. Further, the ratio account can be defined as dynamic account and write a dynamic rule to calculate the ratio.
Regards,
--Kostas

Rules for doors and interface is junk

Need to have a rule for all doors and when I try to edit a old rule it takes me to MAKE A NEW RULE. this is junk. Does anyone test the software before sending it out. And why change it? it was working fine now we have to learn how to navagate the new software.

Hi,
Please check the following settings:
1. Go to Transaction Code FS00. Give your Bank GL A/c number and press enter. Click on "Create/Bank/Interest" and find out your FSG. For example your FSG is G005.
2. Go to Transaction Code OBC4. Select your Company code's FSV and double click on "Field Status Groups". Then select FSG which is available in your bank GL account (G005) and double click on it. Now you can find various Groups.
3. Open another screen and go to the transaction code for posting keys OB41. Double click on your posting key. (Its may be either 40 or 50). Click on "Maintain Field Status".
4. Now you can compare various field statuses which are available in Posting Keys and Field Status Groups. Field Statuses between these two should be same. It not make necessary changes accordingly and save the data.
5. Now close your existing SM35 session and open it again. Select your session and press Shift+F4 to release the session. Now you can execute your batch input session.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Kannusamy S

Input rule for Calcuate account

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for