Install single package from testing

I just switched to Arch from Gentoo, and so far it's been mostly great. What I want to do right now is install 1 package from testing, and only that one. Is there an easy way to do this, besides uncommenting the testing repo, installing xorg-server, and commenting testing again? Basically (if you're familiar with Gentoo and emerge), I want to know what pacman's equivalent to /etc/portage/package.keywords is. Alternatively, if there's a way to make kde4 not absurdly slow with a relatively new ultra-low-end nvidia card (9300m), then I'm up for that as well. Additional background for this question is that I was hoping the newest (beta) drivers might alleviate this issue, but they depend on an xorg-server version that only exists in testing. I don't want to run testing, but if the new drivers help, then I'd be willing to run them (along with any reasonable, if unstable, dependencies). Thanks in advance.

shimage wrote:I just switched to Arch from Gentoo, and so far it's been mostly great. What I want to do right now is install 1 package from testing, and only that one. Is there an easy way to do this, besides uncommenting the testing repo, installing xorg-server, and commenting testing again? Basically (if you're familiar with Gentoo and emerge), I want to know what pacman's equivalent to /etc/portage/package.keywords is. Alternatively, if there's a way to make kde4 not absurdly slow with a relatively new ultra-low-end nvidia card (9300m), then I'm up for that as well. Additional background for this question is that I was hoping the newest (beta) drivers might alleviate this issue, but they depend on an xorg-server version that only exists in testing. I don't want to run testing, but if the new drivers help, then I'd be willing to run them (along with any reasonable, if unstable, dependencies). Thanks in advance.
Welcome to the forums.
If you upgrade only xorg-server, you're going to have problems. There are other packages designed to be used with it.
With that being said, you can always put testing as the last repo in /etc/pacman.conf. Then if you want to upgrade one package, you explicitly call it with pacman -S testing/<package_name>.

Similar Messages

  • Install some packages from [testing] repository

    Hello Guys,
    Could you suggest me how can I install and update from time to time only several packages from testing but not all of that repository?
    Have a nice day,
    Stas

    bangkok_manouel wrote:
    There are completely valid scenarii where you can use only few packages from testing (see above, the linux kernel for example). Also, using different libs versions is not a heresy (simlinking is) so there are very few comments in this thread that would have been much more constructive without the condescending tone. Or should we, from now on, consider our fellow users as all dumb in opposition to competent linux users [1] as it has always been ?
    [1] http://www.archlinux.org/about/
    It is NOT safe to assume that ALL readers are competent. Just browse through the forums every once in a while. Hence care should be taken in giving advise.
    This is not a private club, things posted here are read by many competent Arch users and some incompetent as well. Results show up in a Google search. Even though its perfectly valid for me to wash my motherboard in water to get rid of dust, I wouldn't post that advise here without big WARNING tags. This isn't an indication that I assume all users are idiots, but simply that I know there are some who will not understand the 'ifs' associated with such a thing.

  • Need package from testing, How can I install?[solved]

    Hi
    I must install the i81 Driver from testing, but what must I edit in the pacman.conf?
    I have try it with
    Incoming = /etc/packman.d/testing
    this don't work.

    Remove that line from pacman.conf - it's completely incorrect. "Incoming=" means nothing to pacman, and if you look in /etc/pacman.d, there is no file called testing.
    Here's the right way. Uncomment these two lines in pacman.conf:
    #[testing]
    #Server = ftp://ftp.archlinux.org/testing/os/i686
    Then do
    pacman -Sy testing/xf86-video-i810
    If you don't need any other packages from testing, re-comment the lines in pacman.conf - if you want to be able to get selected packages from testing, move the lines to the end of pacman.conf, after all other repos.

  • Searching and installing packages from testing w/o editing pacman.conf

    Is this possible?

    tomk wrote:Installing individual packages from the testing repo is not recommended as they are likely to depend on testing versions of other packages. The only supported way of using the testing repo is to enable it at the top of the list in pacman.conf.
    I don't understand why that is true.
    If I enable the testing repo and update a package (pacman -S package), and if the dependencies are set correctly, the dependencies from testing needed should also be installed/updated, right?

  • Unable to choose single packages from group ?

    Hey ! Previously when I used "pacman -S kde", I was able to answer "no" to question like "Do you want to install all packages from group <kde>", then I could choose "yes/no" for every single package. Now it has changed. After typing "pacman -S kde" there's only question "Continue installation?" and if i press "no" pacman terminates installation ! So if I dont want to install everthing what should I do ?

    This seems relevant...
    http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=99934
    Last edited by falconindy (2010-06-28 11:23:23)

  • Install Go-oo from Testing or AUR?

    I just noticed that Go-oo is in the testing repo. I'm not running a testing system. Does it make sense to install Go-oo (if I want to try it) from the testing repo, if I'm not using any other packages from testing? Or would it be better to use the version in AUR?
    I guess I'm wondering both which would produce a better working version of Go-oo in my system and which package is being upgraded more consistently?
    Also is there any prognosis on when Go-oo might be ready for the extra repo?
    Thanks.
    Last edited by cb474 (2009-04-27 09:45:00)

    AndyRTR wrote:For localization just use the vanilla langpack PGBUILDs as proto and change the install path. That should work.
    Thank you, that worked like a charm! :-)
    If someone also wants to localize go-openoffice, here is my PKGBUILD:
    pkgname=go-openoffice-de
    pkgver=3.0.1
    pkgrel=1
    pkgdesc="OpenOffice.org - german language files for go-oo.org"
    arch=('i686' 'x86_64')
    license=('LGPL')
    url="http://www.openoffice.org"
    makedepends=('rpmextract')
    depends=('go-openoffice')
    source=(http://ftp-1.gwdg.de/pub/openoffice/extended/3.1.0rc2/OOo_3.1.0rc2_20090427_LinuxIntel_langpack_de.tar.gz)
    md5sums=('43151ce886665ef794a939c765ac7d3f')
    build() {
    cd ${srcdir}/*native_packed*/RPMS
    for i in *.rpm
    do rpmextract.sh $i
    done
    # install openoffice language files
    mkdir -p ${pkgdir}/usr/lib/go-openoffice-3.0.99.6/basis-link
    cp -R opt/openoffice.org/basis3.1/* ${pkgdir}/usr/lib/go-openoffice-3.0.99.6/basis-link
    cp -R opt/openoffice.org3/* ${pkgdir}/usr/lib/go-openoffice-3.0.99.6/basis-link
    chown root:root -R ${pkgdir}/usr/lib/go-openoffice-3.0.99.6/
    I just altered the name, pkgdesc, depends, source (there's a newer file online now, the old one doesn't exist anymore), md5sums and the install part of course
    I don't know if the pkgver is correct (since it is 3.1.0 RC2) but hey, it works!
    If someone wants to localize it for another language the only thing you have to do is to change the pkgname, source¹ and md5sums line.
    ¹: Choose your langpack .tar.gz file from here: http://ftp-1.gwdg.de/pub/openoffice/extended/3.1.0rc2/
    Just like the vanilla openoffice you have to install the spell and grammar checker afterwards. The file is located here: /usr/lib/go-openoffice-3.0.99.6/share/extension/install
    Thank you very much again Andy. I don't go back to vanilla openoffice
    EDIT: I also don't really care if you split the mono and gstreamer dependencies into other packages (if that is possible). I would install them anyway
    But I don't really get the point why Arch should do this? Openoffice is a fat package, everyone who wants to install knows this... One or two dependencies more don't hurt much in my opinion. So what is bad about mono and/or gstreamer?
    I'm very happy with the features like video support since the Java Media Framework (JMF) isn't available for x86_64 :-(
    Also vanilla openoffice could be placed in AUR so there's a way you can install it without those dependencies.
    Last edited by darie (2009-04-27 23:18:27)

  • Multi-file Loading Single Package from Multiple Agents?

    hi,
    i am trying to load the Multiple files from(Interface-Load Multiple file to Oracle DB) a package. as this activity is done multiple loading files Name from single table.
    I just want to know that is there any solution to execute the single Package from Multiple Agents for Load Balancing from Single table. & if YES then refer any document????
    Regards,
    AMSII

    done.resovlesd my self

  • Import a single Package from dmp

    Hi,
    Is this posible the we can import an single package from a dmp file ?
    If yes please give the syntex.
    Thanks
    Nitesh

    Oracle Version.
    SQL> host exp hr/hr
    SQL> host imp hr/hr show=y
    "end;"
    "CREATE PACKAGE emp_stuff AS"
    " CURSOR c1 RETURN employees%ROWTYPE; -- declare cursor spec"
    "END emp_stuff;"
    "CREATE PACKAGE BODY emp_stuff AS"
    " CURSOR c1 RETURN employees%ROWTYPE IS"
    " SELECT * FROM employees WHERE salary > 2500; -- define cursor body"
    "END emp_stuff;"                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   

  • Install all packages from a given repository?

    Is there a way to install every package from a given repository? For example, say I wanted to install every package from core (or at least every non-conflicting package, since systemd-sysvcompat is an issue)? I thought maybe something like '# pacman -S core' might do it, but it didn't.
    Back when AIF was still around, I could do this by checking everything at install time, but now it's a multi-step process to collect all the packages and then install them.

    For me, I found I was using most of what was in [core] and it was easier for me to just install everything in it than to weed out the handful that I didn't need. Yes, I know there are _that_ many packages in [core], I'm just _that_ lazy.
    In another scenario, I could see someone wanting to have an uber-system with absolutely everything possible and available installed. I used to do this a few years back with distros like Fedora where I would do a complete install.

  • How to install a package from a disc

    i have the file     sudo-1.7.2p3.tar    on a disk and i need to know how to install a package from a cd, what lines do i need to type to install it?:|

    If you are running as root, you can execute that command as ../../b43-fwcutter-011/b43-fwcutter -w "$FIRMWARE_INSTALL_DIR" wl_apsta.o and there is no need for sudo.
    Btw, what wireless card is this? Have you tried searching for a pacman package for it?
    To access the cd drive, use the mount command. Enter man mount to read the manual. (I assume you do not have a graphical environment set up yet.)
    Last edited by fsckd (2010-05-12 04:37:52)

  • Installing older package from aur

    how do I revert to an older package from the aur? I installed the new build of utorrent and it won't run so I was wondering how to revert back to the old build? thanks

    Allan wrote:If I was the author, I would have just responded "yes"! 
    Well, my first thought was "of course it fscking is", but in the spirit of the forum I gave a more diplomatic answer.
    Last edited by Xyne (2010-12-26 07:13:50)

  • Install a package from Solaris 10 cd

    Hello,
    I accidentaly removed a package (namely SUNWgcc) from the system. I have the Solaris 10 CDs. Is it possible to install this package for the CD? I check the CD and it looks like SUNWgcc on it is not a package that I can install with pkgadd -d.
    Thank You,
    PN.

    This does not seem to work from the Solaris 10 CD 1 -
    the CD directory structure is different.
    Specifically I am trying to install SUNWmfrun which
    is in the /cdrom/tmp/root/var/sadm/pkg directory.Don't go there.
    Stay in the Product directories on the CDs. You'll find the package there.
    However this directory doesn't have a pkgmap file in
    it so running the pkgadd command fails. No, that's not a package. /var/sadm/pkg contains information about the package database, so some of the files and directories there have the same name as packages (but they're not packages).
    Further investigation shows another directory,
    /cdrom/tmp/root/var/sadm/pkg/SUNWmfrun/save/pspool/SUN
    Wmfrun which does have that file, but running pkgadd
    against that directory fails completely.Still not a package.
    How can I use pkgadd to add packages from the first
    CD in the Solaris 10 installation?The packages are in the 'Product' directory.
    Your paths seem odd. You have a normally booted host and you're just inserting the CD? What are the contents of /cdrom?
    Darren

  • Problem installing a package from AUR

    I'm not expecting anyone to install this package just to try and answer my question but,,
    I have /home on a 10 gig space ext3 and it's only 2% full.
    When I try and install doom3-phantasm, the package downloads, builds and when it's time to install a window says not enough space to install.
    No way this single game is over 9.5 gigs.
    I'm not even seeing where it's trying to install to.
    Is this a problem with the package build or am I not seeing something?

    I wrote the pkgbuild, so I've got it installed
    $ pacman -Ql doom3-phantasm
    doom3-phantasm /opt/
    doom3-phantasm /opt/doom3/
    doom3-phantasm /opt/doom3/phantasm/
    doom3-phantasm /opt/doom3/phantasm/config.spec
    doom3-phantasm /opt/doom3/phantasm/description.txt
    doom3-phantasm /opt/doom3/phantasm/guis/
    doom3-phantasm /opt/doom3/phantasm/guis/assets/
    doom3-phantasm /opt/doom3/phantasm/guis/assets/splash/
    doom3-phantasm /opt/doom3/phantasm/guis/assets/splash/launch.tga
    doom3-phantasm /opt/doom3/phantasm/pak999.pk4
    doom3-phantasm /opt/doom3/phantasm/phantasma.pk4
    doom3-phantasm /usr/
    doom3-phantasm /usr/bin/
    doom3-phantasm /usr/bin/doom3-phantasm
    doom3-phantasm /usr/share/
    doom3-phantasm /usr/share/applications/
    doom3-phantasm /usr/share/applications/doom3-phantasm.desktop
    doom3-phantasm /usr/share/licenses/
    doom3-phantasm /usr/share/licenses/doom3-phantasm/
    doom3-phantasm /usr/share/licenses/doom3-phantasm/LICENSE
    Alternatively, take a look in the "pkg" directory of where you built it, or just examine the .pkg.tar.gz installation file.
    What does this show:
    df -h
    Last edited by brebs (2008-04-04 01:00:53)

  • Error Installing with Package from CCP

    Hi,
    Apologies if there's a CCP board; I didn't see it in the menu.
    I used Creative Cloud Packager to make a package of apps for Mac.
    Installing the package using Apple Remote Desktop returns ".. could not be installed.  Error message: "Running package scripts...""
    When I run it locally on any machine (10.6 or 10.9), it responds with this error:
    The installation progress slows to a crawl about 3/4 of the way through "Running package scripts..." then after a few minutes returns "The installer encountered an error that caused the installation to fail.  Contact the software manufacturer for assistance."
    Nothing relevant seems to appear in the console log.
    Anyone have any ideas?
    Thanks,
    Jeff

    Im having EXACTLY the same problem
    After installing a new package ONCE, if I then try to re-install the same package again it fails half way through the install on second install atempts on a new Mac
    its a nightmare because I REALLY need a stable package to deploy accross many macs in our business,
    ADOBE PLEASE sort this out this is a MAJOR problem for your customers

  • Install gzip package from Solaris 8 CDROM

    I was trying to add gzip package from Soloris 8 installation CDROM but was not successful, would appreciate your kind advice.
    regards!!!

    Try to remove the package and reinstall it again.
    --> pkgrm SUNWgzip
    Don't use CDROM version, try to download the newest version of gzip1.3 on http://www.sunfreeware.com
    ^_^

Maybe you are looking for

  • How can you get a photo within a movie clip .

    I have created an imovie of an athletic event and want to extract several photos from the various clips.

  • SAP E-Commerce 5.0 for R/3 walkthrough anyone?

    Where can I find a document that describes the installation of the E-commerce for R/3. I do find those two CDs but that wouldn't be enough to install it. in the Netweaver link under the Installations and Upgrades->SAP Application Components->SAP E-CO

  • Reg:Standard purchase oder printing

    Dear All, In ME9F transaction code we assigned one 'z' print program for standard PO printing and as well as one 'z' form(sap script ) name for standard PO printing. what is problem means we included one 'z' condition type for PO printing. where we h

  • Signatures for Exchange and Me

    How do I setup separate signatures for my Exchange mail and Me on the iPhone?

  • In the LSMW RFBIBL00 Background error ?

    Hi Friends, I am using rfbibl00 to create batch input session for FI data upload . My poblem is Session can b pricessd successflly in forground . But when I submit it to back ground , it goes into error . ZGL_BALANCE_HEADER G/L Balance Header BLDAT