Instrument volume different recording vs. composing

Have a client with Logic Pro X, 10.1, OSX Mavericks, Roland MOC-1 synth
Audio from synth fed thru Behringer USB audio
All else being the same, when he composes he sets volume levels (in Logic) for various instruments.
When recording to a track, the volume on individual instruments (only one or two out of seven) is radically altered, either much greater or much weaker.
Does not appear to be clear correlation between any settings and this phenomenon.
I'm trying to support him with workarounds for the various glitches that Logic X appears to demonstrate.
Anyone encountered something similar?
Thank you.

Hi Vikas.
I tested recording audio with one slide. The published version did not appear softer when recording just one slide.
I then created a new project.
I got the same softer audio when publishing.
I also had 4 slides which cut of the first second of audio. (I made sure to move the audio about .25 seconds from the beginning of each slide, so there was blank space before and after the audio.)
One slide didnt publish the audio at all.
This project was smaller than my first.
This project consists of 23 slides. most with audio.
This time, I did all recoring via: Automatic demo,( no panning).
I did not use the "video demo" function.
What can be done to publish projects with audio successfully in Captivate 6.0.1.240?

Similar Messages

Can't hear my software instrument well when recording.

I did a pro tools session in a recording studio. I don't know Pro tools so I asked the engineer if he could make the recording into a file that I could put into Garageband. He did that and I loaded the individual parts into Garageband. However, when I try to put down a keyboard part while listening to the other instruments, I can't really hear the keyboard. I put the volume all the way up on the keyboard region in the mixer (and the computer) but it still sounds low.
Do I have to get a pre amp or something to boast the volume of the USB keyboard? If so, what would could I use that won't cost an arm and a leg. thanks.

macuser84 wrote:
Do I have to get a pre amp or something to boast the volume of the USB keyboard?
you're recording MIDI, not audio, you can't "pre-amp" the digital signal.
you can raise the instrument volume a bit more:
http://www.bulletsandbones.com/GB/GBFAQ.html#midiinstrumentlouder
(Let the page FULLY load. The link to your answer is at the top of your screen)

Volume of records XI can handle ?

Hi My comapny management is evaluating SAP XI for SAP integration with other legacy systems.
Can anyone provide me how many volume of records that XI can handle per hour (for all interaces) ?
Can anyone provide me how many volume of records that XI can handle per Interface?
All of our requirements take thousands of records from flat-file and feed to SAP or take IDOC's thru batch process thru XI to generate flat-file via FTP to later feed legacy.
I need document to show to management.
Appreciate ur help.
Thanks
ravi

HI Ravi,
The performance is based on Multiple Parameters.
- Sizing/Hardwares
- Volume in peak hours
- Type of Interfaces - Sync/Async etc
There is a Tuning guide from SAP. to tell about different parameters etc Have a look into this.
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/com.sap.km.cm.docs/library/xi/3.0/sap exchange infrastructure tuning guide xi 3.0.pdf
Refer these threads-
Evidence of High Volumes with SAP XI
Regards,
Moorthy

How can we assign different colours to different records(line items) in alv

how can we assign different colours to different records(line items) in alv reporting?

Hi Friend,
Please see this SDN Wiki for setting the color in ALV :[http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/ABAP/ABAP-DevelopingInteractiveALVReportusing+OOABAP]
There are so many SDN Wiki's on this just try with search Alv Color display in SDN,
Regards,

Can I repair the Master Boot Record (MBR) or Volume Boot Record (aka Windows boot partition) for Windows XP using Windows Vista/7 commands?

I have an SSD drive whose file system is corrupt and unreadable and it's OS of choice is Windows XP SP3 32-bit. I don't have a Windows XP disc.
Is it possible to repair the Master Boot Record (MBR) or Volume Boot Record (VBR) using a Windows Vista or 7 Recovery Disc? What about a Windows PE disc?
I researched around the Internet and found a command in Windows PE called bootsect (http://pcsupport.about.com/od/bios-booting/ht/bootsect-nt60.htm) that can repair both older and new Windows Volume Boot Code (NTLDR or BOOTMGR). The link states that the
bootsect command does NOT fix the MBR. Even the technet site here lists a reference to bootsect and that it can repair the MBR of both old and new versions of Windows (which doesn't appear to be correct). Can I use bootsect to restore the VBR of XP?
If bootsect cannot help me, then what is its purpose? Possible ex: Someone has a dual-boot XP and 7 system, the user uninstalls XP, and then uses bootsect to write BOOTMGR to the VBC.
I would appreciate any insight. Again, I don't have an XP disc. But I do have a WinPE disc and Win 7 Recovery disc and I was hoping I could fix my XP MBR and/or Windows VBR with one of the two.
Thank you.

Checked these ?
http://www.microsoft.com/resources/documentation/windows/xp/all/proddocs/en-us/bootcons_fixmbr.mspx?mfr=true
http://pcsupport.about.com/od/fixtheproblem/ht/repairmbr.htm
Arnav Sharma | Facebook |
Twitter Please remember to click “Mark as Answer” on the post that helps you, and to click “Unmark as Answer” if a marked post does not actually answer your question. This can be beneficial to other community members
reading the thread.

Reading fixed length file with different record types

Hi,
I need to read a fixed-length file with different record types, but the record identifier is in 31st position and not in 1st position.
But if I give 31 as position in File adpater wizard, BPEL takes whole 1-31 as identifier.
How we need to read such files.
Thanks
Ravdeep

hi ,
u cannot use the default wzard for this
use some thing like this nxsd:lookAhead="30" nxsd:lookFor="S"have a look at the below link it has some examples
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B31017_01/integrate.1013/b28994/nfb.htm

Huge volume of records are routing to the remote user other than his position and organization records. Synchronization and DB initialization taking more time around 36 hours.

Huge volume of records are routing to the remote user other than his position and organization records. Synchronization and DB initialization taking more time around 36 hours.
Actual accounts & contacts need to be route around 2000 & 3000 but we have observed lakhs of records routing into local DB.
We have verified all the Assignment Rules, Views.
We ran docking object visibility rules and we have observed that some other accounts are routing due to Organization rule passing. (these records are not supposed to route).
Version Siebel 7.7.2.12,
OS Solaris.

let me know what would be the reason that 1st million takes only 15 minuts and the time goes on increasing gradually with the increase of dataYes that's a little strange. I only can guess:
1. You are in archivelog mode and the Archiver is not able to archive the redo logs fast enough
2. You don't use Direct Load and DBWR ist not able to write the direty block to disk fast enough. You could create more DBWR processes in that case.
3. Make a snapshot of v$system_event:
create table begin as select * from v$system_event;After the import run
create table end as select * from v$system_event;Now compare the values:
select * from begin order by TIME_WAITED_MICRO descwith the values given you by
select * from end order by TIME_WAITED_MICRO descSo you can look where your DB spent so much time waiting for something.
Alternativly, you could start a 10046 trace on the loading session and use tkprof.
Dim

Converting File Content: 2 different record structures

Dear all,
I have the following question: Is the PI 7.0 file adapter capable to convert the file content of a file which has two different record types? E.g.
Rekord 1: String(2) String(4) String(19)
Rekord 2: String(2) String(7) String(8)
In the XML structure I need for each of the record set, an own record structure e.g.
<documentName>...
<recordset1>
<NameA>
<field-nameA1>field-value</field-nameA1> // String(2)
<field-nameA2>field-value</field-nameA2> // String(4)
<field-nameA3>field-value</field-nameA3> // String(19)
</NameA>
</recordset1>
<recordset2>
<NameA>
<field-nameA1>field-value</field-nameA1> // String(2)
<field-nameA2>field-value</field-nameA2> // String(7)
<field-nameA3>field-value</field-nameA3> // String(8)
</NameA>
</recordset2>
The different record sets can be determined by the value of field 1 (string(2))
Thanks and best regards
Florian

HI,
I can see that.
The number of characters in the file for TABLE2 is lesser then the number of field size given.
for eg. if the table2 fixed field length sum is 20 ,your file contains only 10 characters. Please give complete data for table2
Test file
100WELCOME 0430000960603201321
<b>2000000000040008000803</b>
Table2.fieldFixedLengths: 1,10,10,10,3,3,4,1,38
Ragards
vijaya
Message was edited by: vijaya kumari

HT201401 I have no volume on recorded videos; what could the problem be?

I have no volume on recorded videos; what could the problem be?

you have no control, or you have no sound?

Count(*) giving different record count than Group by

I have a table which is giving me different record counts as below:
SELECT COUNT(1) FROM tbl_A --45104 records
SELECT ID,COUNT(*) FROM tbl_A GROUP BY ID ORDER BY 1 --42084 records(ID is the primary key)
Any idea why this will happen?

Can you quickly show us what the below are returning?
SELECT COUNT(ID) FROM tbl_A
SELECT ID,COUNT(ID) FROM tbl_A GROUP BY ID ORDER BY 1

Ruleframe + Updates in same table on different records

I have following problem :
Change event with DML for one column in one record have to result in an update of different records in same table
if business rule is validated, I get a problem in the cg$AUS trigger, No data found.
In the business rule (on after row triggering level), I call a procedure, which do the updates on the same table.
What do I do wrong. Do I have to start a new transaction for this ?
I hope someone can help me.
Regards
Jo-an

Jo-an,
You definitely don't have to start a new transaction, you should just use the tapi upd procedure to perform the update, as described in the Headstart User's Guide.
Could you try again and report back if you still have the problem?
kind regards,
Sandra

Can clips made with different recording modes (SP/LP) be put in same movie?

My cousin recorded the family reunion in LP mode while I had my digital camcorder set to SP. I'm using Premiere Elements 4 to make a DVD using everybody's stills and the two digital camcorders' movie clips. Does it matter about the different recording modes? Can I put clips of both speeds in the same authored movie? If not, I guess I could make two movies and burn both files to the same DVD disk. Can they have the same menu? Or how do I make it easy for viewers to play both movies on their TV (not on a computer)? Thanks for your help and for any suggestions.

If you're talking about a miniDV camcorder that's recorded in both LP and SP -- it won't make any difference at all. Digital data is digital data, as far as Premiere Elements is concerned.

Display of huge volume of records

Hi,
Say I have a huge volume of records 50,00000 and I need to display 100 records at a time in a page .. how should my approach be.
Do I use ValueListHandler?
Thannks in advance!

Hi,
Say I have a huge volume of records 50,00000 and I
need to display 100 records at a time in a page ..
how should my approach be.
Do I use ValueListHandler?
Thannks in advance!hi :-)
do you mean pagination?
there are posted examples here in the forum.
kindly just try to search them :-)
example:
http://forum.java.sun.com/thread.jspa?messageID=4486714#4486714
regards,

Download from IR has different record set than on screen

Apex IR ( 3.2) query uses 2 page items to filter. Results are correct on screen but when downloaded we get a different record set as if one of the 2 Page items has not been passed in.

If you are having problems with the prints being a different size than what is on the screen, I believe there are two settings to try to adjust. If you are using IE, you can check the Page button with the arrow down and look for "Text Size." Mine is set to "Medium." Also you can go to the picture of the printer at the top and select the arrow down next to it and select Page Setup. From there, you will see Enable Shrink-to-Fit which may be causing the problem or you can change the font type and size. Do you see these options?
If not, what kind of computer do you have and what web browser are you using?
Don't forgot to say thanks by giving "Kudos" if I helped solve your problem.
When a solution is found please mark the post that solves your issue.
Every problem has a solution!

Adjust voice and instrument volumes in single track

Hi, I am relatively new to Garageband and have never really worked with mastering vocal tracks before. I had an old cassette tape that my father had done some recordings on. They were done in a studio and are vocals with organ accompanyment. I wanted to break the cassette down into tracks and put it on YouTube.
I plugged my cassette player's headphones jack into the audio-in port on my Macbook and recorded one long 20 minute track in. I figured out how to adjust the Noise Gate and AUGraphic EQ to reduce most of the static from the transfer and original cassette. The only problem that remains is that when the track was originally recorded, the organ is very loud at some points and drowns out the vocals.
Does anyone know if there is any way to apply filters or mess with the EQ on a single track to lower the volume of the organ or raise the volume of the vocals?
Any assitance would be greatly appreciated!
Thanks.

I don't think there's much of a chance since probably the organ and the voice occupy similar frequency bands. What you can do is pull up the graphic eq on the track (go to the track info pane and add that effect in one of the free slots) and try the different frequency bands to see whether raising or lowering one or several of them makes the balance better. But I guess it will just make the whole mix sound worse.

Instrument volume different recording vs. composing

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for