Interactive reports grouping issue.

Hi
I have a few interactive reports.
I need to be able to remove the GROUP BY clause on any field when that field is removed from view by using the Select Fields feature in interactive reports.
How can this be achieved?
Regards
Adam

Hi!
This is not possible with CRM interactive reporting unless you assign every employee to a manager role in the CRM Org Model (which would contradict it's purpose). Unfortunately, your request would contradict the central authorization principle behind interactive reporting.
Due to this fact and because the expected data volume would also probably be too large to be handled by interactive reporting, I recommend to use BW reporting instead. BW is much better designed for large data volumes, and you do not have the Org Model restrictions as in interactive reporting.

Similar Messages

  • Interactive report "group by" endsum is only a page-sum!

    Interactive report "group by" endsum (total for a numeric column) is only the sum of the values of the last page! Is this a bug?
    You can test on the page: http://apex.oracle.com/pls/otn/f?p=1949:1 User/password = apex/apex
    You see a sample - as png picture - on the page: http://progkor.inf.elte.hu/a/GroupByEndSum.png
    Albert

    john2013 wrote:
    Anybody installed the latest APEX? i believe it's 4.2.3.
    You can find out for yourself by requesting a workspace on apex.oracle.com, which always runs the latest production release.
    Could you please tell me
    is the limitation for interactive report "group by" action increased?  (3 columns max for my 4.2 version)
    No. Patch releases like 4.2.3 are never likely to include significant changes in functionality. They only provide bug fixes.
    I consider this is a major drawback...
    Interactive reports follow the 80/20 rule. They satisfy 80% of the requirements of 80% of users 80% of the time. If your requirements fall into any of the remaining 20% categories then you have to build something yourself. APEX is a development tool after all...

  • Interactive report Group By functions support Number

    Dear All,
    I developed an interactive report that retrives its data from a package. Now i want to use a group by and use Max function.Since my columns' types are STRING, I cant use Max function.Does anyone know any solution for that?
    MAny thanks in advance.
    Best regards,
    Zahra

    john2013 wrote:
    Anybody installed the latest APEX? i believe it's 4.2.3.
    You can find out for yourself by requesting a workspace on apex.oracle.com, which always runs the latest production release.
    Could you please tell me
    is the limitation for interactive report "group by" action increased?  (3 columns max for my 4.2 version)
    No. Patch releases like 4.2.3 are never likely to include significant changes in functionality. They only provide bug fixes.
    I consider this is a major drawback...
    Interactive reports follow the 80/20 rule. They satisfy 80% of the requirements of 80% of users 80% of the time. If your requirements fall into any of the remaining 20% categories then you have to build something yourself. APEX is a development tool after all...

  • Interactive Report "Group By" Limitation

    Hi,
    Anybody installed the latest APEX? i believe it's 4.2.3.
    Could you please tell me
    is the limitation for interactive report "group by" action increased?  (3 columns max for my 4.2 version)
    I consider this is a major drawback...
    Thanks,
    John

    john2013 wrote:
    Anybody installed the latest APEX? i believe it's 4.2.3.
    You can find out for yourself by requesting a workspace on apex.oracle.com, which always runs the latest production release.
    Could you please tell me
    is the limitation for interactive report "group by" action increased?  (3 columns max for my 4.2 version)
    No. Patch releases like 4.2.3 are never likely to include significant changes in functionality. They only provide bug fixes.
    I consider this is a major drawback...
    Interactive reports follow the 80/20 rule. They satisfy 80% of the requirements of 80% of users 80% of the time. If your requirements fall into any of the remaining 20% categories then you have to build something yourself. APEX is a development tool after all...

  • Interactive Reports - group by in SQL - download reports doesn't work

    Hi,
    I have the following SQL as the region source of an interactive report.
    select SERVICELEVEL, SUM(CONTRACTVALUE), SUM(DOLLARVALUE), count(SERVICELEVEL) from "ACSPROD"."CONTRACT" where CONTRACTSTATUS='Active' group by SERVICELEVEL
    The report shows exactly as expected. I have also integrated BI Publisher 10.1.3.4.1 with APEX 3.2.0.00.27
    Problem 1
    The report download doesn't work for any of the formats (CVS/XLS/PDF/RTF). When I rewrite the SQL without the group by clause (not the wanted results), then the report downloads work.
    What am I doing wrong?
    Problem 2
    Irrespective of the above issue - when I add a sum aggregate and download the report (any format) - it doesn't show the summed value.
    What am I doing wrong?
    Please advise!
    Cheers
    Mynhardt

    Hi Pratadamski ,
    I could reproduce this issue at my end. This is a bug. So, I have filed on your behalf (6432429).
    When i use tables ( not views) directly in my SQL and use column alias for computed column, it does work fine!
    i.e., this query is good with databinding at designtime and runtime:
    SELECT ALL trip.PersonID,
                        COUNT(*) AS Num_Trips
    FROM trip
    GROUP BY trip.PersonIDThanks & Appreciate your feedback,
    Sakthi

  • Hyperion Interactive reporting performance issue.

    Hi,
    We created a report in Hyperion Interactive reporting using Hyperion Essbase as database connection file .
    Report performance was good in Interactive reporting Studio we don't have any problem in studio.
    when we open the the report in Hyperion Workspace We are facing performance issue of the report and also when i hit refresh button to refresh data in the Workspace,i am getting the following error message
    *"An Interactive Reporting Service error has occurred - Failed to acquire requested service. Error Code : 2001"*
    Any suggestions to resolve this will be really helpful.
    Thanks in advance
    Thanks
    Vamsi
    Edited by: user9363364 on Aug 24, 2010 7:49 AM
    Edited by: user9363364 on Sep 1, 2010 7:59 AM

    Hi
    i also faced such an issue and then i found the answer on metalink
    Error: "An Interactive Reporting Service Error has Occurred. Failed to Acquire Requested Service. Error Code: 2001" when Processing a bqy Report in Workspace. [ID 1117395.1]     
    Applies to:
    Hyperion BI+ - Version: 11.1.1.2.00 and later [Release: 11.1 and later ]
    Information in this document applies to any platform.
    Symptoms
    Obtaining the following error when trying to process a BQY that uses an Essbase data source in Workspace:
    "An Interactive Reporting Service error has occurred. Failed to acquire requested service. Error Code: 2001".
    Cause
    The name of the data source in the CMC contained the machine name in fully qualified name format whereas the OCE contained the machine name only. This mismatch in machine names caused the problem. Making the machine name identical in both cases resolved the problem.
    Solution
    Ensure that the name of the data source as specified in the OCE in Interactive Reporting Studio matches the name specified in the CMC tool in the field "Enter the name of the data source".
    In fact, all fields need to match between the OCE and the CMC Data Source.
    regards
    alex

  • Interactive Reports - Performance Issue

    Hi All
    We have been getting ORA-04030: out of process memory … more and more frequently since first implementing Interactive Reports. From Enterprise Manager we had a look at the most costly queries and the one that stands out the most is:
    SELECT *
    FROM WWV_FLOW_WORKSHEET_CONDITIONS
    WHERE CONDITION_TYPE = ‘HIGHLIGHT’
      AND WORKSHEET_ID = :B2
      AND SECURITY_GROUP_ID = :B1
    ORDER BY HIGHLIGHT_SEQUENCE, NAME I have done all I can with the memory configuration and we are in the process of upgrading the servers to 64 bit Linux.
    However, I noticed that WWV_FLOW_WORKSHEET_CONDITIONS table has 400,000 rows and the above query is performing a full table scan on it. As the query is run each time an IR report is viewed, this could account for the problems. The DBAs are of the opinion that the indexing and query are optimal and cannot be improved, so the obvious solution is to archive and purge the table.
    Of the 400k rows, 80% are session values linked to sessions that no longer exists. It would appear that each time a user adds a filter or highlight to an interactive report it is recorded as a session value in the WWV_FLOW_WORKSHEET_CONDITIONS table. When the user logs out and closes the session, the values remain in the table and aren't cleared!!!? We currently average about 90 users a day with 60,000+ page requests so 400,000 rows is way more than I would expect to see.
    Am I missing something? How do redundant session values get purged from the ir flows tables? Is there a (supported) way for me to clear them?
    This is a critical issue for me now and I have raised an SR on metalink, but if the forum could offer some advice or assistance it would be very much appreciated.
    Cheers
    Simon
    Bumped by: Shunt on May 12, 2009 11:00 AM

    Hi Varad
    Thanks for your help. I have had a good play with the purge function and now I'm more confused than ever. First let me explain my test scenario: I have an application with an interactive report in which I am logged in and able to make session changes (without saving the reports). I am observing the session activity on the Interactive Report using the apex_application_page_ir_rpt view which is set to filter on the application and page number for the Interactive Report I am testing.
    Test 1
    User logs into application, adds a filter to the report.
    Result: A new row appears in the apex_application_page_ir_rpt view
    Administrator Purges all sessions > 10secs old
    Result: The new row is removed from apex_application_page_ir_rpt view
    Test 2
    User logs into application, adds a filter to the report.
    Result: A new row appears in the apex_application_page_ir_rpt view
    User logs out of application
    Result: The new row remains in the apex_application_page_ir_rpt view
    Administrator Purges all sessions > 10 secs old
    Result: The new row still remains in the apex_application_page_ir_rpt view view
    I hope that makes sense. Why would the session values not be cleared if the user logs out first? Why are they not then cleared if all the sessions are purged?
    I am hoping that someone else can repeat the test and see if they find the same result.
    Cheers
    Simon

  • Interactive Report Source Issue (Speed Related)

    Hi,
    I'm having a bit of an issue with an interactive report that forms the basis of an app i am creating. This was running fine until i decided to switch up the number of test rows from 100k to 5 million. The source for the report is as follows
    SELECT
      a.field_1,
      a.field_2,
      a.field_3,
      a.field_4,
      a.field_5,
      a.field_6,
      a.field_7
    FROM
      table_a a
    where
      (a.field_1 = :P1_VARIABLE_1
      or :P1_VARIABLE_1 is null)
      and (a.field_2 = :P1_VARIABLE_2
      or :P1_VARIABLE_2 is null)
      and (a.field_3 = :P1_VARIABLE_3
      or :P1_VARIABLE_3 is null)This takes about 60 seconds to run in the application environment when the variables are populated (far too slow) and less than 1 second when the variables are null. So far i have been unable to recreate this issue in PLSQL developer, i.e. when i run this query with substituted values for the variables it runs fine, the issue only occurs when running in the application. The search fields are indexed and i don't think this is the problem. I have changed the where clause of the query to the following:
    where
      a.field_1 = :P1_VARIABLE_1
      and a.field_2 = :P1_VARIABLE_2
      and a.field_3 = :P1_VARIABLE_3and this also runs in less than a second both in and out of apex (only with populated variables, without there are no results which is why i can't use this..), which i found very confusing. Has anyone come across any similar problems to this before? I really don't understand what's going on!
    Here's some of the debug:
    select
           null as apxws_row_pk,
           "FIELD_1",
           "FIELD_2",
           "FIELD_3",
           "FIELD_4",
           "FIELD_5",
           "FIELD_6",
           "FIELD_7"
    from (
    SELECT
      a.field_1,
      a.field_2,
      a.field_3,
      a.field_4,
      a.field_5,
      a.field_6,
      a.field_7
    FROM
      table_a a
    where
      (a.field_1 = :P1_VARIABLE_1
      or :P1_VARIABLE_1 is null)
      and (a.field_2 = :P1_VARIABLE_2
      or :P1_VARIABLE_2 is null)
      and (a.field_3 = :P1_VARIABLE_3
      or :P1_VARIABLE_3 is null)
    )  r
    0.18: binding: ":P1_VARIABLE_1"="P1_VARIABLE_1" value="value_1"
    0.18: ...Session State: Save "P1_VARIABLE_1" - saving same value: "value_1"
    0.18: binding: ":P1_VARIABLE_2"="P1_VARIABLE_2" value="value_2"
    0.18: ...Session State: Save "P1_VARIABLE_2" - saving same value: "value_2"
    0.18: binding: ":P1_VARIABLE_3"="P1_VARIABLE_3" value="value_3"
    0.19: ...Session State: Save "P1_VARIABLE_3" - saving same value: "value_3"
    78.82: Printing rows. Row window: 1-10. Rows found: 1Any help trying to speed this up would be greatly appreciated!
    Cheers,
    James
    Application Express 3.2.1.00.11
    Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.2.0

    Gus C wrote:
    One thing I would try.
    Create a new report using the wizard and during the create process, say yes to enable search fieldsNot for an interactive report.

  • Report Group Issue

    Hi,
    We have a report group 1AIP, the report generated using this report query has variant in the test system but the same is not there in the validation system(next to the test system).
    When investigated the report inside the report group is same 1AIP-001, but the way it is generated in the test system is through GR33 whereas in validation system is GRR3. Can some one tell why the variants are missing! and why the reports inside the report group is different?
    Note: The description of report group between the Test and validation is different.

    It is not possible to add aggregated calculated fileds like count, countdistinct in a bar chart view's calculation tab. I don't know how you did it. Can you give the next step that you did after choosing Group by as type.
    Anyway, I tried the same thing with updating ordered list and found that for the third calculation (Count(number)/CountDistinct(user)), the result is 1 and 3 (it should have been 1.5), so there is certainly some problem.
    Once you give me the steps on how you created Count, CountDistinct calculated fields and added those in the bar chart, and after I can reproduce, we can file a bug/SR.
    Thanks,
    Vishal
    BAM Dev

  • Interactive reports authorization issue ?

    Hi All
    I am working on CRM 7.0  , interactive reporting
    As per SAP CRM interactive reports standards, employees can only see their opportunities and managers can see only the opportunities created by his team.
    I need that all employees can see all the opportunities created by them or others and the managers also
    What are the settings t be changed to enable this functionality
    Regards
    Fahim

    Hi!
    This is not possible with CRM interactive reporting unless you assign every employee to a manager role in the CRM Org Model (which would contradict it's purpose). Unfortunately, your request would contradict the central authorization principle behind interactive reporting.
    Due to this fact and because the expected data volume would also probably be too large to be handled by interactive reporting, I recommend to use BW reporting instead. BW is much better designed for large data volumes, and you do not have the Org Model restrictions as in interactive reporting.

  • Crystal Report grouping issue

    I have a report with 2 groups.  I first group by Profile then Location with there being 1 Profile and 2 Locations that exist within that profile.  I have a subreport in the Location Group header that reports correctly with Location 1 on page 1 and Location 2 on page 2.  I then want to summarize the data by profile.  I currently have another subreport in the Profile footer that I hoped would accomplish this, but instead I only get the totals from the first location and not the second.  Can someone tell me what I am doing wrong?  Any suggestions would be helpful.
    DSmith

    Do you want the sum from each locations? you can use shared variables to pass the values from subreport to main report. Also you mentioned that you placed the subreport in profile footer. Does this subreport consist of all the fields that you have in subreports placed in location1 and location2?
    regards,
    Raghavendra

  • Interactive Report Webclient issue:

    Hi,
    We are facing starnge Issue in IR Web client report.We have IR report filter at leaf level.When we select 4 or 5 filters then we are genaratig the report and Query results 5 laks records.When we are selcting 9 Id's the Query processed in 10 mints and it is giving Zero results.Actually our users want to process the report by selecting 9 Id's.The same report when we proceesed in IR studio we are getting the results.Please help on these.
    We are in 9.3.1.0 IR version.

    check to see that al connection information is the same between server and client (IR Studio)
    Check Usage Tracking logs re the SQL being sent
    Check Query Log in IRWebClient. Add dbgprint file in location of IR Desktop Studio install and the location of executable for IE or FF which ever you are using - review that.
    Have DBA monitor your session from each and see what is going on.

  • Issues with the Radio Group and interactive report

    Hi,
    I have an interactive report that shows customer names and associated revenues... I want my users to be able to filter customer list by Province and by City in a way that when the user select a province then only associated cities show up (driven by a table)... for the filtration I am using 2 Radio Group items (one for Provinces and the other one for Cities)
    Everything is working fine, except for the fact that when I select a province (let's say Prov A) and then select a city (let's say City A1) and again when I select another Province (let's say Prov B) I get the list of all cities associated to Prov B + city A1... Not sure why my previous selection of City is showing up with the list of new cities when I change the province... I SHOULD BE ABLE TO REST ALL CITIES WHEN A NEW PROVINCE IS SELECTED
    here is the code
    For interactive report
    select     CUSTOMER_NAME,
         SUM(YTD) AS YTD
    from     T_TABLEA
    where
    (PROVINCE=
    CASE
    when :P2_PROV = 'All' THEN PROVINCE
    ELSE :P2_PROV
    END
    and
    (CITY=
    CASE
    when :P2_CITY = 'All' THEN CITY
    ELSE :P2_CITY
    END
    GROUP BY CUSTOMER_NAME
    For Province Radio Group I am using a static list:
    STATIC2:All;All,Alberta;AB,Ontario;ON,Quebec;PQ,British Columbia;BC
    For City, I am using a dynamic list using following code:
    select 'All', 'All' return from dual
    union
    select distinct INITCAP(CITY) display_value, CITY return_value
    from T_TABLEA
    where
    Province = :P2_PROV
    order by 1
    Thanks

    Check the session state of items P2_PROV and *:P2_CITY* when the issue occurs and run the LOV query separately with the session state values.
    If that too fetches it wrongly, then you would need to change your query.

  • Interactive Report Issue - Control Brake for Group By

    Hi all,
    is it possible to create "Control Brake" for the Group By view of the interactive report?
    I have the following IR with group by (Take a look at the GROUP BY View!!!): https://apex.oracle.com/pls/otn/f?p=2071:212
    Now I would like disable the lines with repetitive values. The report should be the following:
    CPU Type    CPU Speed    Count (CPU Types)
    ==========  =========    =================
    Celeron           366                    1
    Pentium I         100                    1
                      166                    1
                      200                    2
                     1200                    1
                     1700                    1
    Pentium II        366                    1
                      667                    1
    .Is it possible to realize it with interactive reports?
    Regards

    S-Max wrote:
    Perhaps any way using Javascript, jQuery, and s.o?
    Any Ideas?Use a standard report with break formatting or a custom row template.

  • Performance issue with Hyperion Interactive Reporting  Report

    Hi,
    We created a report in Hyperion Interactive reporting using Hyperion Essbase as database connection file .
    Report performance was good in Interactive reporting Studio we don't have any problem in studio.
    when we open the report in Hyperion Workspace report performance is very very slow. We are using system 11.1.1.3
    Any suggestions to resolve performance issue will be really helpful.
    Thanks in advance
    Regards
    Vamsi

    Thank you so much, It is working fine when the report is in table structure (List Report. I mean insert a table and drag and drop the fact items and dimention items in to the table)
    The requirement is looks like that, it is not a pivot table. Now I want apply the different color or shadow for Item1 and Item 2 in all groups... Please help me.
    Total Fact Fact 1 fact 2 Fact 3 ......
    Group 1
    Item 1 Item 1 000 000 000 000 ...
    Item 2 Item2 000 000 000 000 ....
    Group 2
    Item 1 Item 1 000 000 000 000 ...
    Item 2 Item2 000 000 000 000 ....
    Group 3
    Item 1 Item 1 000 000 000 000
    Item 2 Item2 000 000 000 000
    Thanks and Regards,
    Murugan

Maybe you are looking for