Intercompany report

Hi everyone
i have an intercompany report. according to my requirement i have a selection screen for selecting the period.
but there are some 145 different records.my consult. asked me to hard code the code.
i felt i can upload the report and use it to disply rather than doing hard coding.
so can anyone tel me if there is a sample code to upload a excel file and display the same as a report.
please reply at the earliest.
will reward with full points.

Hi,
Go through this links:
http://www.sapdev.co.uk/file/file_upexcel.htm
http://www.****************/Tips/ABAP/UploadExcel/Prg.htm
Regards
Adil

Similar Messages

Validation rule for/against intercompany reporting

Hi,
I need a validation rule which checks that a cons unit does not report intercompany against itself.
Validation should be on individual data records.
Have checked various options, no success so far.
Have you got any hints? thx, Clemens

The only standard validation I can imagine for this is to include each cons unit as a check to ensure the same value is not used for trading partner. This will be an expensive validation is there are many cons units.
Another idea is to use a custom task with code to check this.
Another idea is to include a check for this in the update rules as part of the initial data extraction (if using load from data stream).

HFM Intercompany reports & BI Publisher

Does anyone have a guide or links to documentation detailing the process to use BI Publisher for the HFM Intercompany Matching reports?

BIP is a different tool that pretty much can do the same job. And (it appears to me) that BIP will eventually be replacing Reports. I am sure BIP will undergo a few more versions first...but Reports does not seem to be undergoing any new development (that I know of). This is just my two cents...
More to the point: You can also use Oracle reports or BIP or both to generate yoru reports and can even use Reports to generate the XML data (from the db of course) and then use this data file to feed into BIP and use BIP format templates to display the data and even have multiple BIP templates for a single data file.
In may respects BIP format templates are easier to work with (based upon MSWord) than the layout editor in Oracle Reports and this method allows you to keep the (sometimes very complex) sql in Oracle Reports intact, unchanged. However, the use of a MSWord plug in has limitations...
It is my opinion that currently BIP has many formatting limitations that are not present in Oracle Reports. To overcome these formatting limitations you pretty much need to learn XSL if you have complex reports. And it is not any easier than learning how to use XSL (if you are not a Java/DotNet type) than it is to learn the layout editor in Reports (IMHO) .
All of the above is my personal perspective based upon 10+ years on Oracle Reports and 14 months on BIP so take it with a grain of salt. I do not nor have I ever worked for Oracle.
Scott

Creating a "bunched" report (intercompany)

Hi Gurus,
I have a tricky report requirement that can be achieved using multiple reports but that is not ideal and will make it difficult to maintain.
The report is an intercompany report with Entity, Interco member and Account in the rows. The report needs to have Entity on the outside with each intercompany partner listed and then a subtotal for each intercompany member and then each entity member. Within each intercompany member, a "group" of accounts needs to be shown (intercompany account groups). Finally, a subtotal for the total of an account group needs to be shown beneath all the entities and intercompany, then this is repeated for a new account group, as follows:
Is this possible with one report? I'm open to using VBA or any other tricks to turn this into one report. The current problem is that the Entity and intercompany need sorting, but if they are sorted then the accounts will not be bunched together as shown above.
Appreciate any help or advice on this.
Best,
Chris

Moderator message: you said your issue is solved but did not mark your discussion as such, please see
How to close a discussion and why

Intercompany Matching Report Balance is not the same as Plug account

Hi - we are running an ICP Matching report (standard setup without any custom consolidation logic). The balance in the report does not tie to the balance for the Plug account that we ran the report for - Intercompany report uses plug account as the parameter to generate the report.
For this grouping of accounts, we have both P/L and Balance sheet accounts plugging to the same Interco plug account. While we understand this is not standard practice, mixing the different account types in the same Plug account, could this be causing our issue?
Does the IC Plug accounts generate Periodic values for Income Statement accounts?
Any guidance is much appreciated.

We separated the expense account from the liability accounts - we also created a rule to capture the prior year YTD plug account balance in the current month. This solved our issue.

I/C Mismatch Report Format

I am new to creating/ modifying intercompany reports in HFM and am trying to fix a formatting issue that is annoying many of our users. On the mismatch report the interco balance is shown on two lines. So for example the first line might be entity E123 w/ partner E500 with a balance of -5,000 and then the line below it will be E500 with partner E123 with a balance of 5,000. Is there a way to get this to net so in this case a match would occure and neither balance would show or at least it would show with a net of zero. Please let me know if I am not clear on my issue. Thanks in advance.

Hi
It seems your application has been designed so that all accounts use the same account type for both sides of a transactions, using positive and negative numbers, instead of using different account types (expense/revenue, asset/liability) for each side of the transaction. For example, both "sales" and "purchases" are set to account type Revenue
In this case, using a plug account to run ICP reports will not provide the expected result, and all amounts will appear in the same column. This is because of the way the ICP reports work, and is considered expected behavior.
In the case of using Plug accounts, the assignment of accounts to Entity or Partner is based on the account type. Asset and Expense accounts are assigned to EntityAmount, all others are assigned to PartnerAmount.
Solution
1. Amend the application design to use different account types for each side of the transaction. For example, set account type = revenue for "Sales" account, and account type = Expense for "purchases" account
OR
2. If the application design must remain unchanged, so that both sides of a transaction use the same account type, then the ICP matching report must be designed using matching accounts rather than plug account to get the desired outcome.
hope this helps
thank you
Regards,
Mahe

Hyperion Financial Reporting - #missing Suppression causing report not to generate 11.1.2.2

Hi,
We recently went live with an implementation of 11.1.2.2 and have build large report suite in Financial reporting to accompany the release. Over the weekend we patched up to 11.1.2.2.305.4195 however we have began to notice our FR reports are failing to generate and hang at a white screen for both HTML and PDF views.
After a little digging it looks that the issue is with any report that has suppress #missing on rows. If I take this suppression off the report will generate successfully. This is not an acceptable solution for us as many of our reports will run into 100's/1000's of lines.
Has anyone else experienced this recently and if so, are there any other fixes to be suggested. I'm assuming this is a bug introduced with 11.1.2.2.305
For reference we are also running the following versions.
Reporting and Analysis Framework - 11.1.2.2.000.998
Oracle® Hyperion Financial Reporting, Fusion Edition - 11.1.2.2.0.0387
Graham

Hi, We have but awaiting a response. Interestingly I've did some testing and suppression does work if I go via the advanced suppression option which although a inconvenient to rework the reports does give a solution.
Additionally I've noticed a couple of other issues with suppression across the application so looks to be more widespread.
1) Webforms are no longer suppression #missing both in the application and also when downloaded to Excel.
2) Intercompany reports no longer suppress when we set tolerance to say 10% etc.
Each in itself can be worked around but annoying non the less.

Intercompany Eliminations Options Question

Hi Forum,
I have a few basic questions around IC Elims, that I want to get other experts opinions on.
1. What are all of the options for IC elims?
Correct me if I am wrong, but you can run IC elims 2-3 different ways. One, being SPRUNELIM logic, two using BRs and SPRUNCONSO logic, and three being SPICBOOKING logic (not sure on this one). Are there any other ways to run this?
2. In a Legal application, it is normal practice to use the business rules and SPRUNCONSO logic. So my question is how do the buyers and sellers entities know who bought or sold from them intercompany?
I just want to understand how others get around this, as my knowledge on using Business Rules for IC elims is limited. So I need to understand how the users will be able to see where IC elims are going to/coming from. From what I can tell IC elims will post to a datasource, but does that give the user the ability to see where the Elim came from or went to?
Anyone?
Thanks,
Mike
Edited by: Michael Hutchins on Mar 11, 2009 4:05 PM
Edited by: Michael Hutchins on Mar 16, 2009 8:09 PM

Hello Mike
Question 1
Another way to do elims is to use the same account for both intercompany debits and credits. . The sign that you enter for a counterparty determines whether it is a debit or a credit. This approach will then self eliminate intercompany balances at all levels in the roll-up and it is not necessary to set up elimination rules. The intercompany reporting is then used for merely running mismatch reports and this can be made to be self-policing by the units entering the data. It works particularly well for intercompany payables/receivable, loans payable/receivable, interest payable/receivable, dividends paid/received. Any balance left at group level is the net mismatch on that account and can be analysed on the mismatch report.
Question 2
To do intercompany reporting and elimination you need to set up an intercompany dimension. This is usually the same as the entity dimension, or a flatter version of it. Each entity's intercompany balance must be broken down against the counterparty it is against by using the members of the intercompany dimension. Using the entity and intercompany dimension, it is possible to set the application up so that an entity can run a mismatch report that shows them what a counterpart entity has reported against them as well as what they reported against the counterpart, along with the mismatch. This report could also show the elimination entries.
Paul Rowbotham

Intercompany Master Data

Hi,
We are currently having the following setup with regards to intercompany customers and vendors in our organization.
1. In case of a trading partner handling multiple activities/business units, we are creating 1 intercompany customer and vendor for each of the activity.
2. Name 3 field in XD03 or FD03 is used to denote the business unit or activity for each of these customers and vendors created.
3. We are using 8KER and 8KES to maintain a list of all trading partners, customer ids, and vendor ids and their default partner profit centers to ensure that we are able to perform intercompany reporting accordingly without manual efforts being spent in reclassification of Intercompany Balances from one activity to another.
4. These default partner profit centers is the same as the default partner activity of each trading partner.
However as a result of the above setup we are having lots of issues in the upstream Accounts Payable and Accounts Receivable processes. Some of the key issues are outlined below:
1. Unable to make consolidated payments per trading partner as multiple vendors are existing.
2. Incurring additional bank charges and service fees
3. Vendor Reconciliations and follow up requires additional headcounts
4. Multiple maintenance of master data
5. On account clearing would take more time since the task need to be performed for several customers
6. Tax classification need to be maintained multiple times
7. Users would select wrong customer and vendor codes when performing intercompany recharges
With above being mentioned, our aim is to have a single customer and vendor code per trading partner so that we are able to tackle the Accounts payable and receivable issues and also ensuring that no effort is spent in manually reclassifying the intercompany figures during the monthly, quarterly, half yearly and yearly closing process.
We would appreciate if someone can guide us on what is the SAP recommendation in this business scenario and what solutions are available to ensure that we maintain 1 customer and 1 vendor per trading partner without having any impact on the reporting steps. In case there are any solutions then please provide the same for ECC 6.0 EHP 4 (Classic Ledger) as well as for New General Ledger.
Please note that we are currently using ECC 6.0 EHP 4 (Classic Ledger) and SEM BCS 6.0 for consolidation.
Rgds
Venugopal Nair

Hi
Wellcome to SDN. These notes will be helpful
SAP Note 109254 - Customizing stock transport order Cross Company
SAP Note 308989 - Consulting note for cross-company transactions
SAP Note 543821 - FAQ: cross-company processing
Regards
Eduardo

Doubling of figures in ICP report

Hi
I have a parallel hierarchy in one of my customs, in the second hierarchy, i have used calculated members to draw data from the main hierarchy using HS.EXP functions
Now when i draw an Intercompany report, it gives me balances on both the hierarchies and so in the report the plug account balances are doubled up.
Is it possible to have a limit the members of Custom dimension for IC report purposes?

You can easily accomodate these report designs by altering the POV script in the report.
To filter on one of the Custom hierarchies, the script is something like this:
AccountEntity_0=A#IntercompanyReceivables.C1{TopOfHierarchy.[Base]}
AccountPartner_0=A#IntercompanyPayables.C1{TopOfHierarchy.[Base]}
To filter on the [None] member do this:
AccountEntity_0=A#IntercompanyReceivables.C1#[None]
AccountPartner_0=A#IntercompanyPayables.C1#[None]
A performance trick: if your ICP reports suppress all customer, you can write the script:
AccountEntity_0=A#IntercompanyReceivables.C1#Top.C2#Top.C3#Top.C4#Top
AccountPartner_0=A#IntercompanyPayables.C1#Top.C2#Top.C3#Top.C4#Top
--Chris

How to query ICP result in [Elimination] value ?

Dear experts,
I want to create a form which can show an ICP transaction as below:
____________________________________SalesIC______CostIC_______PlugPL
Entity A____Partner B___<Entity Currency>__500
Entity B____Partner A___<Entity Currency>_____________600
Now, after consolidation, i want to see [Elimination] value in form. I did create a form like this in v11.1.1.3 before and it worked. However in v11.1.2.2.300, it keeps sending me invalid cell. Below is the additional information I want to see in form:
____________________________________SalesIC______CostIC_______PlugPL
Entity A____Partner B___<Entity Currency>__500
Entity B____Partner A___<Entity Currency>_____________600
Parent A___Partner A____[Elimination]______-500___________________500
Parent A___Partner B____[Elimination]_________________-600________-600
Parent A___[ICP Top]___<Entity Currency>________________________-100
When I build this form, [Elimination] row always invalid (red/orange color). I wondering how can I show the elimination process ?
I know that we can create intercompany report for summary, but still I need to show this elimination as a report formal.
Thanks for your help.
Anna

Hi,
Yes, actually in form, i create exactly as you told. It's automatically created by system when i select entity. HFM is automatically added Parent.Entity. That's in form script. But when viewing the form, the entity display only Entity, not with its parent.
Did I create something wrong with this ?
Appreciate your help. Thanks,
Anna

Report 2 show all receipts&disbursements in one screen 4 intercompany&Trade

Hi all,
i just have to see whether there is any standard report in SAP which pulls to shows all receipts and disbursements in one screen for intercompany and trade, if there is no standard report then they asked me to build a func spec to develop this kind of report.
so i am trying to find out with the SAP community here, whether we have any standard report on this or not. if no, then how to proceed on this func spec.
can anyone please put some light on this, i would be verymuch grateful.
Thankyou
Jay

Refer the following:
REPORT ZTEST12.
* Type declarations.....................
TYPES pict_line(256) TYPE c.
* data declarations......................
DATA :init,
      container TYPE REF TO cl_gui_custom_container,
      editor    TYPE REF TO cl_gui_textedit,
      picture   TYPE REF TO cl_gui_picture,
      pict_tab TYPE TABLE OF pict_line,
      url(255) TYPE c.
CALL SCREEN 100.
* Dialog modules......................................
MODULE status_0100 OUTPUT.
SET PF-STATUS 'SCREEN100'.
IF init is initial.
    init = 'X'.
    CREATE OBJECT:
           container EXPORTING container_name = 'PICTURE_CONTAINER',
           picture    EXPORTING parent = container.
ENDIF.
IMPORT pict_tab = pict_tab FROM DATABASE abtree(pi) ID 'ENJOY'.
CALL FUNCTION 'DP_CREATE_URL'
       EXPORTING
            type    = 'IMAGE'
            subtype = 'GIF'
       TABLES
            data    = pict_tab
       CHANGING
            url     = url.
CALL METHOD picture->load_picture_from_url EXPORTING url = url.
CALL METHOD picture->set_display_mode
       EXPORTING display_mode = picture->display_mode_fit_center.
ENDMODULE.
MODULE cancel INPUT.
LEAVE TO SCREEN 0.
ENDMODULE.

Intercompany Reconciliation (ICR) process reports

Hi,
I'm setting up Intercompany Reconciliation with New Ledger ECC6 and i wonder if there is any report giving track to what is automatically reconciliated by all 3 processes. Is anyone aware?
Thanks in advance,
Alix
Edited by: Alix Piot on Jan 29, 2009 4:31 PM
Edited by: Alix Piot on Jan 29, 2009 4:32 PM

Hi
it must be always Automatically Reconciliation in any solutions all Intercompany transactions " This is Cross-System"
●      Start reconciliation run automatically (required)
●      Check status of reconciliation run (optional)
●      Perform manual reconciliation (required)
●      Make adjustment postings (optional)
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/EN/c3/f0ab1a6dbe44a0b4fe990d329f29bc/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/DE/16/227c38a7c36259e10000009b38f8cf/frameset.htm
Regards
Edited by: Saif Ali Sabri on Feb 2, 2009 10:55 AM

Reports available in SAP BO Intercompany?

Hello,
Does anybody know which standard reports are available in SAP BO Intercompany?! I read in an overview that are individual and global reports but I need more detail.
I really appreciate the help!
Thanks a lot & Best Regards,
Zaire Garfias

Hi,
There is a predefined set (about 20) of reports in BO Intercompany. However, with using Crystal Reports one may add his/her new reports.

Intercompany Matching report from Financial Report Studio

Hello all,
Im trying to create an Intercompany matching report with Financial Reporting (Hyperion Reports), I've used two grids with identical selections but swapped entity and icp dimensions.
With a function I can retrieve this data into one grid and calculate the mismatch, but my question is do I need first to create a System-defined member list for my ICP members?
As a result of my current report (without the system defined member list) i'm getting half report correct and half incorrect..
Does anybody else face this problem before? Any comments and help will be highly appreciated.
Best Regards,
Jorge

I've created 2 Member List, both identical either for ICP and Entities, using scripts... and it works well....
I've Build up the report in this way:
Grid1 Acct Pay Acct Rec Matching Difference
ICP / Entity XXX Grid2. Column[A] [A]-
Grid 2 (Hide) Acct Rec
Entity / ICP XXX
Note that the Grid1 is getting the information from Grid2 and doing the matching difference. As a result I'm getting a bit list with about 210K lines, that brings to me all possible combinations with all entities. Basically the final report should have about 1K lines for every month, it means that there is a lot of Zero's on the rows. The solution I've found is use the suppress option, but as a result I've got a new problem!!
The Fist(Acct Pay) and the 3rd (Matching Difference) Column Looks fine, but the 2nd column that is "linked' with the grid 2 becomes 0.
And I'm struggling myself to get it done !! eheh If someone know how to get it fix please let me know!!
Best Regards,
Jorge

Intercompany report

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for