Intercompany Transaction Error

Hi
I'm currently having an issue doing intercompany transaction
In FB50 the following transaction have been made
8xxxxxx DR 10000 ( Cocode 1000) with tax type A0
6xxxxxx CR 10000 ( Cocode 2000) with tax type V0
When i try to simulate it gave me an error saying Trading partner in account xxxxxx cocode 1000 not valid.
I have setup the vendor/customer master data and have input the trading partner field
I used OBYA to setup the intercompany clearing account
I have used OB28 to setup the proper validation
Is there any steps i missed or have not done? or anything i should check?
Thanks in advance

Hi...
As per your issue
Trading partner must be the same in the both case (for both the company codes)..than only you can able to process.
I think in your case the company (trading partner) may be different  for both the company codes
Please check and confirm
Regards
vamsi

Similar Messages

  • Error while loading intercompany transactions

    Hi, I use Hyperion Financial Management 9.2.0.3 with Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.1.0. When i try to load intercompany transaction from file, the running task end in 'aborted' status. Also, the packages Application_name_ict_load and Application_name_ict_pkg in the scheme are invalid. What anyone could advise to me? Does anyone encounter this problem?

    have you checked the Task Audit log? I got that error once and it was because another person was loading metadata as I was consolidating.

  • Error on intercompany transaction process

    Hi, Folks.
    When represented the financial report after setting up the intercompany transaction, I met an error message as the similar meaning to " Detailed information for the transactions are not supported in the cell."
    This message is not original text 'cause I translated the message in Korean.
    Anybody knows how to solve this problem?

    Hi,
    If you are referring to that system doesnt allow you to enter intercompany trxns, then I would assume you need to set up support interco txns rountine as below example.
    '* INTERCOMPANY TRANSACTION ROUTINE *
    Sub Transactions()
    HS.SupportsTran "S#Actual.A#AR_ICP"
    HS.SupportsTran "S#Actual.A#AP_ICP"
    End Sub

  • Intercompany transaction does not exists

    Hi,
    I am have posted entry in F-02 and also i have asigned a new company code to the transaction and also document got created.
    now i need to reverse the document for the reversal reason 1 in T.Code FBU8.
    I am getting error message " Intercompany Transaction does not exists".
    Please help me with this issue.

    dear
    check settings in OBYA. is clearing account configured for intercompany postings
    and check that in OBA7 for the document type you using allow intercompany postings.
    regards
    rohit
    Edited by: ROHITBALI on Nov 19, 2011 7:28 AM

  • Intercompany Transaction Flow Set-up when O/U's are not different

    I am seeking to know if it is possible, using I/M Intercompany Transaction Flow, to use the same O/U for start and end O/U? I can get the record into the system with same O/U's, but am denied nodes and the ability to use Intercompany Relations.
    My company currently relies on using the MTL_INTERCOMPANY_PARAMETERS record to point to the I/C CCID wherein seg6 contains the Intercompany segment of the g/L account. Understand, this is a customized method.
    The problem we are experiencing is the ship from customer is under the same O/U as the sold from. However, this is a differnet company legally and needs to be processesed as Intercompany.
    I think the answer is self-evident in the Oracle forms as to what is allowed or not, but perhaps there is something I am overlooking to allow me to utilize the function.

    Hi EMSS,
    When you say intercompnay transactions, do you mean IR-ISO?
    We can create an IR and ISO both in same opearting unit. The whole setup is same as any other IR-ISO except for the setup in Intercompany transaction flow. Process wise, its exactly same upto ISO shipment and costing the material transactions.However, we will not be having any intercompany AR or AP invoices generated. The accounts are netted out. (we are using this in one of requiremetns and we are in R12.1.3. I am not sure from which version this is available)
    Coming to accounting transactions - we used SLA for hitting the right accounts as requried by business.
    Note: We cannot have any logical intercompany transactions within same OU.
    Regards,
    G V Ranjith

  • ORABPEL-08033: EJB Transaction Error

    Hi
    I have a usecase in which procA(sync Service) calling procB (Async Service) and on completion of execution, ProcB gives a non blocking invoke back to procA. Condition: The either of one should be in running state always.
    However there are fault situation in ProcB hence to not to break the sequence we have put a catchAll block which handles/logs and then gives the non blocking invoke back to procA.
    But when ProcB fails somewhere because of some other partner links, it is safely going into catchAll and handling it well and when it tries to do a non blocking invoke it is resulting in following:
    ORABPEL-08033
    EJB Transaction Error.
    EJB exception happened while invoking the partner. Please verify partner service.
    Can somebody give me some leads in this?
    TIA
    regards
    Joy

    I have setup catch statements, both an catch all in the outermost scope and a catch for remote fault at the scope surrounding the call to the AQ. But that's not the issue. The problem is that BPEL don't get the error. The error stay's at the adapter and the BPEL don't come to a failed state.

  • Mapping of Intercompany transaction between SRM & SAP R/3

    Hi SRM gurus,
    We have a scenario where the client wants intercompany transactions to be mapped between SRM & R/3.
    i) they say according  to interco transactions, using SRM PO, the following journal entry will be posted upon GRN:
                        Dr           Expense
                             Cr          A/P to Co Code 1 for SRM Vendor code
    Question : if co code 1 recognizes A/R in Intercompany code, can we match the balance i.e : is it possible to recognize "A/P to Co Code 1 for SRM Vendor code" as Intercompany balance
    ii) When Co. 1 pays for pdts / services on behalf of Co. 2, an intercompany, the journal entry will be as follows :
    Co. 1 : Payment voucher (FB60)
    a) on GRN :
                        Dr   Prepaid promotion
                              Cr    GR/IR Clearing
    b) on IR :
                        Dr    GR/IR Clearing
                              Cr    A/P to Vendor
    Co. 1 : Journal Entry (FB70)
    Charge to Co. 2
                        Dr. A/R from Co. 2
                              Cr.  Prepaid Promotion
    Co. 2 : Journal Entry (MIRO)
    On Invoice Recipt to Co. 1
                        Dr. Expense
                              Cr. A/P to Co. 1
    Is it possible to make a set of journal entries as below by make config changes in SAP R/3 :
    Co.2 :
    Upon GRN : Dr Expense
                           Cr GR/IR Clearing
    Upon IR :   Dr GR/IR Clearing
                           Cr A/P to Co.1
    Co.1:
    Upon IR :   Dr. from Co. 2
                           Cr. A/P to Vendor
    The client wants to track the above postings scenario through old vendor code which is used as SRM vendor code and which is same as maintained in R/3 vendor master "Previous acct. no." field in Accounting view. To me the above entry on IR in R/3 is not at all feasible.
    Like to have your expert suggestions on the above scenario how to map b/w SRM & SAP R/3.
    Rgds,
    Samik

    Hi. What exactly are you looking for with the vendor material number? Note 444976 and 412817 are about it not transferring, butthey are very old, you have not said what version of SRM you are using.
    For the goods receipt, I doubt there will be a note to let you set the posting date or document date in the backend based on approval date, but you can easily use BBP_DOC_CHANGE_BADI method BBP_CONF_CHANGE to set this date to whetever you want.
    Regards,
    Dave.

  • Intercompany Transactions Configuration

    I have a question about configuration for intercompany transactions.
    OBYA does not work in Europe because each company code in our case is separate legal entity and in Europe to be able to make intercompany entry you need to have billing document and there are VAT implications as well.
    SO OBYA is not an answer.
    Does somebody know what needs to be configured in SD (AR side ) and MM (AP side) and FI ( )so when intercompany transactions are created, they can be automatically billed and created automatically entries (with VAT) on both sides in bot involved company codes for AP and AR?
    To make my question more clear I give example of scenario:
    Selling organization one country (egz Spain) company code 0341, customer in Portugal (ship to  and Bill to Portugal) delivery from warehouse in Germany company code 0491
    So I have 2 documents created
    1. Sales invoice from selling organization in Spain to Customer  in PT.
    2. Intercompany billing from Germany to Spain
    What I found out so far is that AR is not complicated but AP side requires kind of EDI configuration.
    I would very much appreciate answer on my question.

    Hi Edyta,
    I came across such scenario in my last project.
    You can meet your requreiment via IDOC functionality. Being from FI, I just testing wrt tax codes. While testing, billing was done in Germany, later accounting entry is automatically posted in Spain.
    Please check on IDOCs functionality.
    I would try to share more information in m ynext reply.
    Kind regards,
    Dinesh Lakhotiya
    IGATE - FICO Consultant

  • FU 065:-Document belongs to cross company- code transaction(error massage)

    Hi expert,
    I am going to reverse a document (after resetting through LSMW,useing -F.80 as for mass reversal) and getting a error massage below(this document has been generated after F110)
    FU 065:-Document belongs to cross company- code transaction(error massage)
    Please advise me how can I reverse this document and also advise me what does it mean,
    Will it be done by FBU8? (But when I am using it,showing two documents what does it mean and advise should I select both document for reversal)
    Please advise
    Thanks & Regards

    Hi
    Thanks for your quick advise,
    I am trying to do that through FBU8 but I am getting there two documents numbere inside for reversal (it contained two documents)
    Should I reverse both documents or I should select one one only
    Please advise why it is showing two documents inside
    Thanks & Regards

  • OBYA - Intercompany transactions

    Hi,
    I would like to better understand the scenarios where the clearing accounts in transaction "BUV" (Tcode OBYA) should be set as GL postings and vendor postings.
    I am very familiar with settings in OBYA as Dr (40) & Cr (50) of GL accounts. When an intercompany transaction is posted, the system uses the clearing account specified here for the missing leg in each of the CoCodes.
    The above set up would also work if the paying company code is different in AP. I understand that trading partner fields can also be populated with the above setting.
    I am not clear on scenarios where the interco clearing accounts are specified as vendor accounts. Any information that would help me to better understand this would be great.
    Thanks,
    SD.

    Great question!  I think you define intercompany customers/vendors in OBYA, as opposed to clearing GL accounts, when several entities under one umbrella have contracts between them in such a way that they need to generate intercompany receivables/payables when they transact with each other.  Meaning, the need to generate sub-ledger entries.  If there is no such need, you just assign a clearing GL account in OBYA.  At a consolidated level (when you add up the numbers of all entities at the corporate level for external reporting purposes), the balance in clearing account should automatically net to zero.

  • Tax on intercompany transactions

    Hi gurus,
    when we do the intercompany transactions  for a free of charge invoices, SAP still incorporate Tax on the invoice. AP didn't want to see the tax on these free of charge invoices. we are using Taxware as our third party Tax software, any help to resolve this issue will be really appreciated. Points will be awarded.
    Thank you
    Priti

    To keep it simple, you should create a new Tax Code for  Tax Code for Intercompany Transactions (if you have anything already where the tax will be 0, you can use that also).
    The T Code to use it is FTXP.
    The Tax percentage rates for the 2 condition types XP1I and XP2I need to be Zero ( considering this tax code will be used by AP process) - If it's by AR process, the condition types that need to be zero are XR1I and XR2I.
    Hope that helps..
    Thanks,
    Nandita

  • Intercompany transactions between Multiple set of books

    Hi,
    We are trying to figure out a way to do Intercompany transactions across different set of books. How can we achieve this? Any pointers in this direction would be helpful
    Regards
    Bala

    Hi experts,
    I need your guidance/suggestion for the issue i have in Intercompany accounting.
    we have setup many-to-many intercompany in GL. Even for
    transactions involving two companies, we want the intercompany line created during posting ,to
    take a specific balancing segment. Posting job replaces only the due from/due to account but the company segment that we define.
    oracle std functionality has a default clearing company concept. In this all
    intercompany trasnactions tht we create for a specific source /category wud go to just 1 default clearing company. But our
    requirement is ..for companies x,y,z ,it shud go to company 100 and for others it should go to 200 ..
    But oracle doesnt support more than one clearing company. Has anybody faced same situation ?
    Any pointers to workarounds /customisations wud help.
    Thank u so much for ur time.

  • Error (-1200) DBMCconnBase; End Transaction- Error -1 detected, auto rollba

    Que tal!!!
    Pues ahora tengo este problema, este sap nos esta sacando canas verdes!!
    resulta que cuando se esta realizaondo una factura y aparece la ventana donde se ingresa el numero de folio del documento y se da el OK aparece ese error
    (-1200) DBMCconnBase; End Transaction- Error -1 detected, auto rollback flag is off, Throwing exception
    cuando lo aceptamos solo cierra SAP, ingresamos de nuevo yse puede facturar durante el dia se presenta de manera aleatoria!!
    siento que es grave el error.. asi que espero que me puedan ayudar!!

    Mi estimado, ese es un bug segun nota 1401013 de SAP, ocurre cuando dos usuarios estan trabajando simultaneamente.
    Aqui el texto de la misma nota.
    Summary
    Symptom
    You work in localization where folio numbers for documents are used.
    Two users are working simultaneously on SAP Business One (either via SAP Business One application or via an Add-on).
    Both users are creating Invoice (or performing any action when max folio number is retrieved from the numbering table NNM1).
    It may happen that one of the users will encounter deadlocks while working, usually with one of the following error messages:
    '-2038 Internal error'
    'Error (-1200) DBMCconnBase:: EndTransaction - Error -1 detected. auto rollback flag is off. throwing exception'
    'Internal error NNM1 2038'
    The deadlock can appear on NNM1 table and OINV table.
    Other terms
    Lock, Add, Error, Crash, Close, Exit, Operation, Action, Parallel, Same Time
    Reason and Prerequisites
    Application error
    En que parche andas?
    Esto se arreglo con el parche 09 del service pack 01

  • Transaction error message

    I purchased an upgrade for "What's That Sound?" Sound Discrimination for toddlers and children, 500 + additional sounds.  However, when trying to download it to my iPad I get "Transaction error.  Please try again later!" and my iPad freezes there.  I have tried since 2/9/13 but get the same error message.  What can I do?

    Hi,
    Ask you BASIS to implement the following Note throgh SNOTE:
    Note 204841 - Message CY 831 Structure KBED is not currently supported
    Pls reward points if solved.
    Regards,
    Renjith Michael.

  • Transaction errors: The lock operation ended unsuccessfully because of deadlock.

    Hi,
    One of our process is getting "Transaction errors: The lock operation ended unsuccessfully because of deadlock." error while processing Partitions in AS 2005.
    We have a process that processes dimensions and partitions based on a SQL table.  Sometimes when the it is processing two partitions at the same time (multi-threaded) for same measure group, server throws deadlock error.    This does not happen all the time.
    Both partitions are bound to different tables in relational database and I also traced the SQL Server and did not get any deadlock error.
    I searched for this error on Google and did not find anything.
    Anyone have any idea about this error?
    Thanks

    Hi All,
    when i  execute the job for cube refreshment,sometimes it is executing successfully,but sometimes it is getting failed with below error  
    Started:  4:08:08 AM  Error: 2015-01-14 04:55:21.03     Code: 0xC11D0005     Source: Analysis Services Processing Task Analysis Services Execute DDL Task     Description: Transaction errors: The lock operation
    ended unsuccessfully because of deadlock.  End Error  DTExec: The package execution returned DTSER_FAILURE (1).  Started:  4:08:08 AM  Finished: 4:55:21 AM  Elapsed:  2832.18 seconds.  The package execution failed.  The
    step failed.
    If any find the solution please post on it.
    Thanks
    Rambabu

Maybe you are looking for