Interest not calculating on work orders

Hello,
We have an issue with interest calculation on work orders in the
There is a work order on which monthly interest is
not calculating any more even though there is balance left with the
order.
The interest got calculated till May,2011, but after that interest
calculation got stopped.There is no investment profile is maintained in
the WBS element to which this order is linked.
Please advise.
Thanks & Regards,
Tapan Patro

Hi,
Check the change documnets (CN60) for the WBS to see if the interest profile was removed. If yes, populate the appropriate profile and try the interset calculation again for the WBS.
regards
Sreekanth

Similar Messages

  • Attachment not shown in Work Order

    Hi, Using Oracle Document ID ID 882952.1, we have configured oracle Functionality to attach Manual / documents in EAM Work Order, but followed all steps as mentioned Oracle Document but attachments are not showing in Work Order when we try view that specific attachment from Maintenance Super User.
    Regards
    Umair

    Thanks for answering.
    Well, we have same archivelink customizing in another systemo for MIRO transaction and it works fine.
    There's a development, of course. There's a job that executes a program and attaches the pdf from a server, etc.
    So we can attach pdf files when entering an invoice. Guess there's a missing step, but don't know exactly which.
    Maybe basis people blocked something, but we don't have a clue.
    Regards,
    J

  • PReq quantity not synchronized with work order.

    Hello,
    I have a work order for which created Preq for external component with quantity 10.
    Then when converting PReq into PO I have change the quantity to 5. So I have PO with quantity 5 but in the work order requirement quantity is still 10. When trying to change it on work order level I'm getting following error message: 'A purchase order already exists for purchase requisition ...'
    Does anyone of you know if there is any option to synchronize quantity in work order level with PReq and PO? I know that for the sales orders there  is t-code VA07 for Comparison of Orders with PReqs and POs. Do we have the same option for maintenance work orders?
    Thanks in advance for any clues.
    Regards,
    Grzegorz

    Grzegorz,
      This is generally a information message and not a error message. Check whether someone has changed the configuration for the message number from "I" TO "E" under Spro> pm > Maintenance and service processing > Config control > Define attributes for system messages.
    Regards
    Narasimhan

  • OCI Catalog Items not transfering to Work Order or PR in NWBC-HTML

    Hello,
    We currently have multiple OCI vendors set up in our SAP system. (We are running SAP 6 enhancement pack 5, and running traditional out of the box OCI, "not SRM". )
    When we use Standard SAP and NWBC desktop client 3.5, we can order from catalog and items will transfer to components tab (if using Work Orders) or PR line items (if using ME51N) with no issues.
    When we use the OCI for Work Order or ME51N in NWBC-HTML, we can access the Vendor catalogs and select the parts, but the shopping cart items will not transfer to SAP
    Can anyone explain what maybe causing the Catalog to return nothing in the Work Order Components tab or ME51N in NWBC-HTML.
    Help will be very much appreciated.
    Thank you.

    Hi Masa,
    I tested both already and it doesn't make any difference. My issue is most probably related to shared_memory as i've read some SAP notes. I've been able to find a workaround for our issue but i feel it isn't a complete solution for our issue.
    We're running a multi client environment and as it seems shared memory is enabled. Shared memory works properly within the EP however in the NWBC it doesn't. After enabling the paramaters for bypass inbound and bypass outbound handler the catalogs started working from within the NWBC aswell. However these paramaters aren't recommended if there isn't any need by SAP?
    If you have any clue on shared_memory and our issue then your inputs are very much appreciated however I feel this issue will most likely be resolved via SP's / patches as the use of the NWBC for SRM is relatively new.
    Kind regards,
    Tim

  • Excise is not calculating on sales order

    Hi Experts ,
    Sub:Excise is not calculaing on sales oder for a perticular plant
    We have configure a new manufacturing plant .in this the system not performing calcualtion on the base amount and no tax duty is coming .but for one plant its coming properly .
    Vk11
    J1id is maitain properly
    Regards
    Sachin gupta

    Hi
    1.Material and chapter id combination.
    Maintain material,chapter id,plant combination
    2.Excise indicator for plant.
    maintain excise indicator 1 for plant.
    3.Customer excise details
    maintain excise indicator 1 for customer.

  • Target Cost in Process Order not calculated

    Hello,
    In Process order, after deliver of FG the target cost is not getting calculated,
    Could you please help me why the target cost is not calculated in process order.
    I have configured all setting for WIP and Variance

    Hi,
    Target costs are only calculated after goods movements have occured on the order, the Target Costs are then calculated during the Variance calculation.
    Target costs will only be calculated after the first goods receipt has been posted to the order. Also you have to ensure that the information to calculate target costs exists on the system in particular in OKV6.
    This estimation is based on the customizing for the Target cost version in transaction OKV6 as in turn will the "real" calculation of the Target costs via the variance calculation.
    So in OKV6 the Target cost will be based on preliminary costing on the order, an alternative cost estimate or the current standard cost estimate. Importantly if the choosen option is not fulfilled e.g. no current standard cost estimate, the target costs will not be predicted or calculated.
    regards
    Waman

  • Eq. not copying from Maint. Work order to Work Approval in WCM

    Dear Experts,
    While I am creating Work Approval from Work Order, Equipment number is not copied from Work Order as per screenshot. why?

    Greetings Parag,
    You have "Reference Object" in your Sequence above the "Reference Object with Installed equipment", which makes the transaction first fill the Functional Location only, and afterwards, the Equipment field is grayed out by the time it gets to copying it.
    Swap the Sequences of fields 50 and 200 or delete the field 50 from copy settings in
    SPRO > Plant Maintenance > Work Clearance Management > Master Data > Data Transfer When Creating with Template > Define Fields

  • Work Order & Cost Center Commitment Management

    We have a business requirement to be able to view our work order commitments (Reqs and POs) from the work order as well as from the cost center assigned to the work order via a settlement rule. Our business users do not like the work order collecting all of the costs instead of the cost center where they perform their cost controlling.
    The actuals will settle to the cost center eventually but without the commitments they have no way of planning for future costs. Commitments management is activated for both the cost centers and work orders involved. I am open to any suggestions on how to achive this requirement. Thanks!

    Any thoughts?

  • Automating the services for object for a work order

    Hi All,
    Can anyone post an ABAP code using which we can automate the process of creating a note for a Work order at the time of saving the work order. I need to create a note with the work order at the time of saving it. This note needs to be attached automatically. Can anyone help me with the code to do this?

    Uhm... If you want us to do your job, how much are you willing to pay?
    How is the note "attached"? If it's an attachment using GOS then the code has already been posted on SDN - look it up. You'll need to add it to the work order creation (I'm guessing there should be some kind of BAPI or FM).

  • External purchase order release date is not calculated

    In our live system, when creating external purchase orders from tasks within work orders, system does not calculate the release date of purchase order as explained in the documentation (planned delivery date - planned delivery time). Strangely, when the calculated release date does not lie within the current year release date is assigned to the creation date. When calculated release date lies within the same year, correct release date is assigned to the PO.
    Althogh our development and productive systems have exactly the same patch level, we do not experience this behaviour on our development system. This makes me think that the problem is due to system-dependent setting or some master data such as factory calendar.
    How could we correct the problem? Thanks in advance.
    Ozgen.
    Edited by: Aselsan IT Department on Jun 14, 2010 2:12 PM

    We don't have a release strategy for PReq.
    On the Preq Item -> quantites/ dates tab there are 3 dates: delivery date, request date and release date. In MRP process, the release date is calculated by the sytem based on planned delivery time and GR processing time. The PReq should be changeable by MRP up to the release date. On the release date the system should transfer PReq to SRM and mark the PReqs
    as u2018firmedu2019 u2013 not changeable. This is a SAP standard process. Worked well with EPRTRANS.
    BADI ME_REQ_SOURCING_CUST imethod CHECK_EXTERNAL_SOURCE is already implemented. The BADI controls what requirements to send to SRM.
    We tried putting a check for Release date like: if release date is = < than system date , send PReq to SRM:
       if is_req_item-FRGDT le sy-datum.
       cv_ext_sourcing = cl_mmpur_constants=>yes.
    It does stop new PReqs with release date in future from coming to SRM. However, the BADI is not retriggered for the same PReq when the release date reached.
    Can you please guide me through the implementation steps? If it possible to retrigger the PI message via a scheduled process?
    Thank you

  • Work order to cost center settlement does not post to GL module (FI)

    Dear Expert,
    I find the Maintenance Work order to cost center settlement does not post to GL module (FI)?Also, the settlement cost element is primary element define in GL chart of account.
    When an maintenance order is settled with KO88 or KO8G the work order value posted cost center and  the value is display in cost center report but not post to GL module in FI.As I notice only good issue or receive to/from work order is posted in GL but not the settlement of work order.Why?
    Between, Kindly advise what are the report or T-code to view the maintenance order is done the settlement and what are the value is settle for maintenance work order?
    Kindly advice under what circumstance when maintenance work order to cost center settlement is posted to GL(FI module)?
    Please advice.
    Thank you.
    KH

    Hi Kiran,
    The error message clearly says that "Cost Center validity starts from 01.10.2014" i.e. in the future period.
    Change the cost center from period in the past date and try.
    BR, Srinivas Salpala

  • Using a hierarchy but also showing work orders that are not in hierarchy

    good morning bi people,
    i have a requirement to show data from a hierarchy which includes Operation and Maintenance information. for example it has an account broken into labour/material/trucking and below this is the pm acivity type and secondary cost element (concatenated). this hierarchy is a manually created hierarchy that is uploaded to BW and is not in ECC. The users do not want to see the concatenated field at the end of the hierarchy, but instead, want to see the Work Orders that have the PM activity types.
    At the present time, we have the report using the hierarchy but we need the work orders to replace the pm activity type/secondary cost element concatenated field. the work order field is a free characteristic and when we drag in the work order in analyzer, it works correctly.
    1) is this possible to use the hierarchy and somehow map the work order field to the end of the hierarchy within crystal?
    2) do you have a suggestion to change the hierarchy, without being a manual nightmare?
    all conversations are welcome.
    Erik

    Good Day Ingo,
    i have created a word document with screen shots of the hierarchy from BW, a screen shot of the BEx showing the free characteristic of Maintenance Order and a screen shot of the crystal report with the PM Activity type concatenated to the Cost Element. Once again, we do not wish to see the concatenated field, but rather see the Maintenance orders that have a PM Activity type the same as the concatenated field. 
    here is the link.
    https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=explorer&chrome=true&srcid=0B1j5hXTptfntYWI1MDUzNGEtY2MxNy00YmMzLWJjZjEtZDA4OGZiYmMyNzFh&hl=en&authkey=CKq4xcgJ
    thanks Ingo,
    Erik

  • Error creating work order for new notification - Related SyncBO not present

    Hi,
    We are working with MAM3.0 standard application.
    We age getting an  error while creating work order for a NEW notification.
    In this scenario both notification and corresponding work order are also not created.
    Here is the error for MAM30001 Sync BO in MEREP_MONI:_
    Reading inbox record (mobile ID=0000001444, seq, no.=29, rcd_cntr=1, data=TOP0001000000
    External format successfully converted to internal format: ldata=TOP0001000000000000000
    Related SyncBO MAM30_010 with Sync key 0000000028 is not present on the device.
    Return code 1 (DOWNLOADER)                                                   
       Here is the error for MAM30010 Sync BO in MEREP_MONI:_
    Return code from RFC BAPI Wrapper call:Order NEW does not exist
    Return code from RFC BAPI Wrapper call:The order/network type  is not defined
    Return code from RFC BAPI Wrapper call:Order NEW does not exist
    Return code 0 (UPDATE MEREP_506-STATUS)                                      
    Can any body please tell me what is the sollutions for this error
    your help in this regard is appreciable.
    Regards,
    Murthy

    Hi Murthy,
    II have no idea what patch level you are on. A while back we had similar issues with some clients. There are several patches around that area available. Perhaps you should have a look into patch 959732.
    Hope that helps.
    Regards,
    Oliver

  • Purchase and release order not allowed for TECO work orders

    Hi
    We are typically setting maintenance work orders to TECO once the physical work as been performed as that sets the reference date for showing the history of when the maintenance was performed, and when the maintenance call was completed. However, we have invoices that may come in significantly later than when the  physical work was performed.
    Once the order is in TECO a purchase or release order (for services against a contract) cannot be created for the work order. Additionally it appears that even if we have a release order,or purchase order, if it is not for the exact amount of the invoice the release or purchase order cannot be ammended - we get the sameerror mssage (BS007) as when creating a new purchase order for the TECO order.
    I had wondered about using BS22 to change TECO to continue to allow purchase  and release orders when the order is in TECO status.
    Any input on pros/cons or other approachs appreciated.
    Philip

    Thanks
    That was what I initially thought. However I was informed that if the invoice is not for the originally determined amount that to post the invoice means having to change the PO, and changing the PO appears to hit the same business transaction as creating a PO, and so we get the error mssage.
    The issue is that we may know we need to have services estimated at, say, $5.000. But we do not know what the actual final invoice will be. So the actual amount may end up being $4,500 or $5,500 as an example, and it may come ni late from the vendor. The Purchse Order side is not my expertize, but I am being informed that the invoice must match the PO amount, otherwise the PO must be ammended to match. As the order is in TECO, the user cannot amend the PO.
    I would be happy to know of other options, or at least good questions to ask. I want the end user to be able to post the invoice against the PO, after the order is in TECO, even it the invoice amount is not exactly the same as what was originally anticipated.
    regards
    Philip

  • Amount Column not showing up in Work Order

    Hi,
    We use SAP Business One 2007A. We have a work order program which is an add-on. When viewing a list of work orders or when viewing open items list for work orders, the amount column does not show up. I tried everything with the format settings and it wont work. Any solutions to this?
    Please let me know..
    Thank you,

    Hi,
    Welcome you post on the forum.
    What add-on is this? Is this open item list for work orders by the add-on?
    Thanks,
    Gordon

Maybe you are looking for

  • I Cant Upgrade my Numbers and Pages in Mountain Lion

    Dear When I click to upgrad software in apple bouton, the appstore appair and tell no upgrade available.Then  I Cant Upgrade my Numbers and Pages.I Have juste install Mountain lion. Thank for your help

  • DDE Poke decided to stop working - LabVIEW 8.5

    I am using LabVIEW 8.5 to, among other things, communicate via DDE and a Brooks software package called SmartDDE with 6 Brooks 5850S mass-flow controllers. I have been able to get this communications link working, and incorporated it into my main con

  • Forced to close RoboHelp after generating SSLs in order to edit content

    I have reported this as a bug, but wonder whether any of you have had similar experiences and, if so, how you resolved it. Have to close RoboHelp after generating SSLs in order to edit content Steps to reproduce bug: Open project from Visual Studio S

  • Is a 13" MacBook Pro really a "Pro"?

    i was about to pull the trigger on a 13", but then i started to reconsider the 15". while a 13" easily meets all the system requirements of some pro applications i need to run, many of these pro applications only recommend 15" and 17" macbook pros. a

  • MBP won't wake up or power on

    i put my MBP (intel santa-rosa late 2007/early 2008) to sleep by closing the lid. i went back and opened the lid and got nothing apart from hearing the optical drive make its usual noise. so i killed the power and tried to boot up normally... again n