Interesting ACE URL Header & Load-balance & SSL on 2 VIPs

Hi There
I have an interesting situation that I am trying to solve. I have 4 websites, each one with SSL Off-Loading on the ACE on the outside. All FOUR websites run on a single server on the inside, but each website is using a different port number for differentiation. Also, they are currently only available on TWO IPs on the outside! I know.....it's a mare!
So, RSERVER = SERVER = 192.168.0.1
Each website has SSL Certs on the outside. https://website1.abc.com - https://website4.abc.com
But, DNS is only bound to 2 IPs on the outside, as that is all we have available currently, until we free up more IPs.
OUTSIDE:
website1.abc.com = 172.16.0.1:443
website2.abc.com = 172.16.0.1:443
website3.abc.com = 172.16.0.2:443
website4.abc.com = 172.16.0.2:443
On the server we have:
INSIDE: 192.168.0.1
SERVER:8001 = website1.abc.com
SERVER:8002 = website2.abc.com
SERVER:8003 = website3.abc.com
SERVER:8004 = website4.abc.com
So, in a nutshell what I need to do is:
Terminate SSL for each website, then match the HTTP header, and pass it to the SERVER on the right port. Sounds easy enough.
But, I am struggling like hell. The VIPs (Wirtual IPs on the OUTSIDE are causing me grief) My steps seem to be breaking my ruleset. Individually they all work, but once I tie them to the VIPs on the outside, it seems to stop. The first site in each CM (class-map) match in the PM (Profile-Map) works but the subsequent site just breaks.
I would post my config, but right now I have sooooooooooooo many variations, it looks like a dog's breakfast.
Can anyone give advice on the process flow to follow to get this to work. My issue is arround the VIPs mainly. To be honest, I don't really care about Load-Balancing right now. That will come later when more servers are added to mix. And then we might have to do inbound NAT too to the Server Farm, but that can wait! :-o
I have created a HEADER map for the headers, individual SERVER FARMS for each port on the RSERVER, ACLs matching the VIPs inbound on 443, CLASS-MAPs matching the HEADER and applying to SFARM, POLICY MAPS matching the CMAPs and doing Load-Balancing with SSL-PROXYs for the SSL headers. SERVICE-POLICY tieing it all together on Interface.
But .... things are going hey-wire.
So, steps are:
RSERVER
SFARMs = RSERVER:PORTs
ACLs = VIPs
CMAP = HEADER = URL
LB PMAP = HEADER CMAP & SFARM
PMAP MULITM = ACL CMAP + LB PMAP & SSL-Proxy
SVC-POL = PMAP MULTIM

Hi Surya
Thanks for the prompt reply. I'm not quite sure what you mean when you say it ca only handle 2 certs. Can you elaborate please?
It would appear to me that you can actually only bind one cert to an IP, based on using a VIP address for the server farm as per the CM in the PM. I can hack out the irrelevant bits tomorrow and post what I have done thus far. I have played with multiple lines of code and various ways of trying to do this, but the end result is that it appears once I have the CM set per VIP I can only set one SSL-Proxy, and so only one cert. If I use multiple CMs, as per the MultiMatch policy, it matches the first CM against the VIP and doesn't appear to move on as per the HTTP Header. If any of that makes sense?
regards
Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPad App

Similar Messages

  • Load balancing ssl that terminates on servers

    hi,
    right now i have a very simple clear-text http + https setup. initially, my load-balancer was terminating SSL, but because of the way our application works, we moved away from that and installed an SSL-server on the servers themselves which we know works fine when we access the servers directly.
    on the css i have a very simple ssl-balance rule:
    content srv.443
    add service srv1.ssl
    add service srv2.ssl
    advanced-balance sticky-srcip
    protocol tcp
    port 443
    url "/*"
    vip address 10.72.39.17
    active
    service srv1.ssl
    ip address 10.72.39.71
    protocol tcp
    keepalive port 51001
    port 51001
    active
    service srv2.ssl
    ip address 10.72.39.72
    protocol tcp
    port 51001
    keepalive port 51001
    active
    the problem i'm seeing right now is that even though i deleted all config regarding ssl-termination on the css, every time i hit the 'ssl-vip' i still get the locally generated certificate instead of the valid one i get when hitting the web-servers directly.
    it's weird that the css keeps trying to use its own certificate, when all related config has been deleted.
    now i have a question, i assumed that there was no problem if one tries to load-balance ssl-traffic when the traffic is terminated on the servers themselves. now i'm not so sure, so an initial question is: can this be done?
    regards,
    c.

    yes, SSL can be terminated on the servers and loadbalancer by the CSS.
    You should remove the "url" from your config because the traffic is now encrypted and the CSS can't see the url.
    If the config is what you indicated, there is no way the CSS can send its own certificate.
    Absolutely no way :-)
    Are you sure your server is sending the correct certificate ?
    Gilles.

  • ACE 4710 and load balancing with sticky cookie

    Configuring load balancing with SSL termination and stickiness for a couple of citrix xenapp servers.  I'm doing a source-NAT as the ACE resides in the DMZ and these particular servers reside on the inside arm of the firewall.  The ACE is in bridged mode to load balance web servers that reside in the DMZ.  Everything seems to work just fine, but the cookie stickiness does not seem to be working.

    Hi David,
    As you may know, using Wireshark to look at an HTTPS capture is only useful if you've installed the server SSL key.This is why I find it easier to use something like LiveHTTPHeaders or HTTPWatch.
    When using cookie-insert, the ACE will not create any dynamic cookie entries.  It will simply create one static entry for each rserver with a cookie value, such as R3911631338, and any client that gets load balanced to that rserver will receive a cookie with that value.  So what you see there is what is expected.
    You are correct in that when using location cookies that the server supplies, the ACE will create a dynamic entry when it sees the server response with the cookie.   The cookie is included in the server's response, and the ACE will look for the value as configured.  The cookie will also be sent to the client.  If the cookie is not in the server's first response, you will need enable persistence-rebalance so that it will look in subsequent server responses.  If the browser opens new connections with that cookie, then the ACE will stick to the same server.
    My suggestion would be to get sticky working with cookie-insert first.  Then if that meets your needs, go with that permanently.  If you need to use server cookies, then once cookie insert is working, migrate your sticky to cookie location.
    Sean

  • VMware vCloud Load Balancing SSL / HTTP

    Hi,
    I'm having issues with enabling SSL Health check for my CAS VMs, works fine when I select TCP however doesn't work when I change health check to SSL.  This relates to a previous issue I've raised (http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/office/en-US/0b3e2573-99ed-49a0-9fbb-c46a629dcc50/exchange-2013-load-balancing-owaecp?forum=exchangesvravailabilityandisasterrecovery
    TCP is great but would much prefer to do an SSL check instead;
    Tests servers using SSLv3 client hello messages. The server is considered valid only when the response contains server hello messages.
    This url helps,
    http://blogs.vmware.com/vsphere/2012/11/load-balancing-using-vcloud-networking-and-security-5-1-edge.html
    The only other issue is I have a redirect at root mail.domain.com => mail.domain.com/owa  Could that be the issue because of the re-direct!
    Thanks ;)

    Hi,
    Try to redirect to HTTPs. More details as below:
    Simplify the Outlook Web App URL
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa998359(v=exchg.150).aspx
    How to configure Exchange to redirect OWA HTTP requests to HTTPS requests in IIS 7
    http://support.microsoft.com/kb/975341
    Please correct me if there is any misunderstanding.
    Also find some external resource for your reference:
    Add a Pool Server to an Edge Gateway
    http://pubs.vmware.com/vcd-51/index.jsp?topic=%2Fcom.vmware.vcloud.admin.doc_51%2FGUID-C12B3954-155F-48AF-9855-E0DE026752D0.html
    Introduction to Gateway Services: Load Balancing
    http://vcloud.vmware.com/using-vcloud-hybrid-service/tutorials/introduction-to-gateway-services-load-balancing
    Disclaimer:
    Microsoft is providing this information as a convenience to you. The sites are not controlled by Microsoft. Microsoft cannot make any representations regarding the quality, safety, or suitability of any software or information found there. Please make sure
    that you completely understand the risk before retrieving any suggestions from the above link.
    Thanks
    Mavis
    Mavis Huang
    TechNet Community Support

  • URL-Based Load Balancing

    I'm having a difficult time trying to configure load balancing on my CSM based on the URL entered. Here is my scenerio:
    Two web servers (WebA & WebB), load balanced on a CSM. WebA & WebB have 90% the same content, so most traffic can be load balanced between them without a problem. The problem (for me anyway) comes in where WebA has certain web sites that WebB doesn't, and vice versa. So I need to load balance to both for 90% of the traffic, and point traffic to a particular server the other 10% of the time based on the URL entered.
    Below is the test config I have so far (that doesn't work correctly), what I am trying for in this example is that any URL that contains /vhosts/ or /programs/ be directed to WebA, and any URL that contains /platform/ or /ssl/ be directed to WebB, and all other traffic be load balanced between the two evenly. (For testing purposes, the servers are being load balanced in "bridge-mode", in production they will be "routed-mode"....I did't want to go through the change controls to change the IP addresses for the test servers!).
    module ContentSwitchingModule 2
    vlan 605 client
    ip address 10.63.240.4 255.255.255.0
    gateway 10.63.240.1
    vlan 606 server
    ip address 10.63.240.4 255.255.255.0
    natpool URL-POLICY-TEST 10.63.240.204 10.63.240.204 netmask 255.255.255.254
    map SRV-A url
    match protocol http url /vhosts/*
    match protocol http url /programs/*
    map SRV-B url
    match protocol http url /platform/*
    match protocol http url /ssl/*
    serverfarm URL-POLICY-TEST
    nat server
    nat client URL-POLICY-TEST
    real 10.40.109.100
    inservice
    real 10.40.109.101
    inservice
    serverfarm URL-TESTA
    nat server
    nat client URL-POLICY-TEST
    real 10.40.109.100
    inservice
    serverfarm URL-TESTB
    nat server
    nat client URL-POLICY-TEST
    real 10.40.109.101
    inservice
    policy TESTWEB-A
    url-map SRV-A
    serverfarm URL-TESTA
    policy TESTWEB-B
    url-map SRV-B
    serverfarm URL-TESTB
    vserver URL-POLICY_TEST
    virtual 10.63.240.10 tcp 0
    vlan 605
    serverfarm URL-POLICY-TEST
    sticky 1
    persistent rebalance
    slb-policy TESTWEB-A
    slb-policy TESTWEB-B
    inservice

    Thanks for the reply Gilles....I've been out of the office for a while.
    Well, right now nothing is working....except that all traffic is going to the default server farm assinged to the vserver. Here are the URLs I am testing with:
    **************TEST A************
    http://10.63.240.10/manual/vhosts/fd-limits.xml
    http://10.63.240.10/manual/programs/apachectl.xml
    **************TEST B************
    http://10.63.240.10/manual/platform/ebcdic.xml
    http://10.63.240.10/manual/ssl/ssl_compat.xml
    ***************BOTH****************
    http://10.63.240.10/manual/howto/htaccess.xml
    http://10.63.240.10/manual/howto/cgi.xml
    When I try attaching to the first URL for example, here is the connection info (I trimmed it down so it will fit here):
    MOSL1S1A#sh mod csm 2 real
    real server farm Conns/hits
    10.40.109.100 URL-POLICY-TEST 1
    10.40.109.101 URL-POLICY-TEST 0
    10.40.109.100 URL-TESTA 0
    10.40.109.101 URL-TESTB 0
    MOSL1S1A#
    MOSL1S1A#sh mod csm 2 conn
    prot vlan source destination
    In TCP 605 10.47.10.10:3738 10.63.240.10:80
    Out TCP 605 10.40.109.101:80 10.63.240.204:8820
    I've tried changing the syntax on the URL statement in the map as such:
    /manual/*
    */manual/*
    /manual/
    *manual*
    /manual*

  • Configuring ACE 4710 for Load Balancing Speech servers

    Hello, I'm configuring ACE 4710's for the first time and I want to load balance my Nuance speech servers on port 554. Here's my configuration on ACE01:
    hostname ace471001
    interface gigabitEthernet 1/1
      switchport access vlan 1000
      no shutdown
    interface gigabitEthernet 1/2
      shutdown
    interface gigabitEthernet 1/3
      shutdown
    interface gigabitEthernet 1/4
      shutdown
    access-list ALL line 8 extended permit ip any any
    rserver host nss01
    class-map type management match-any remote_access
      2 match protocol xml-https any
      3 match protocol icmp any
      4 match protocol telnet any
      5 match protocol ssh any
      6 match protocol http any
      7 match protocol https any
      8 match protocol snmp any
    policy-map type management first-match remote_mgmt_allow_policy
      class remote_access
        permit
    interface vlan 1000
      ip address 10.20.17.21 255.255.248.0
      access-group input ALL
      service-policy input remote_mgmt_allow_policy
      no shutdown
    How would I configure my speech server to isten on 554?
    Thanks in advance

    Hello Reginald
    Currently you have only basic network configuration, there is no loadbalancing config
    I'm not sure what exactly you're asking about , but basically you need to have
    - real servers configured on ACE (
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/app_ntwk_services/data_center_app_services/ace_appliances/vA3_1_0/configuration/slb/guide/rsfarms.html#wp999495)
    - serverfarm configured on ACE (
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/app_ntwk_services/data_center_app_services/ace_appliances/vA3_1_0/configuration/slb/guide/rsfarms.html#wp1014522)
    - L7 policy map (
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/app_ntwk_services/data_center_app_services/ace_appliances/vA3_1_0/configuration/slb/guide/classlb.html#wp1171109 ,
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/app_ntwk_services/data_center_app_services/ace_appliances/vA3_1_0/configuration/slb/guide/classlb.html#wp1027248 )
    - L4 policy map , class-map (
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/app_ntwk_services/data_center_app_services/ace_appliances/vA3_1_0/configuration/slb/guide/classlb.html#wp1027819)
    And then apply it on necessary interface.
    This is a general configuration, in your specific case you may need to configure some additinal features (e.g. I think you will need to have stickiness enabled
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/app_ntwk_services/data_center_app_services/ace_appliances/vA3_1_0/configuration/slb/guide/sticky.html but it depends on your application)
    links are for old config guids , but basic is pretty much the same for all versions.
    Please check them and try to narrow down your question a bit.

  • ACE Load Balance setup and testing - vip

    Got a new ACE 4710 and am I new to the appliance. I am testing out a senario with load balancing between two servers. In testing when I ping the VIP ip address the replies I see are from the real server ip addresses. I am just wondering if this is the correct normal behavior or should I see the ping replies coming from the VIP ip address?
    Thanks

    Do you use the
        loadbalance vip icmp-reply active
    command?
    policy-map multi-match POL45
      class VStest
        loadbalance vip inservice
        loadbalance policy L7SLBPOLtest
        loadbalance vip icmp-reply active

  • Coyotepoint E350 and OracleAs 10g Hardware Load Balancing SSL

    Hi:
    Has anyone been successful using a CoyotePoint E350 with XCEL SSL accelerator card and OracleAS 10g with SSL to hardware load balance an HTTPS site?

    You're on the right track adding the SSL certificate to the Load Balancer. I'm not really sure what you mean 'without the use of Webcache'? However, if I had the choise, I'd always add the certificate to the Load Balancer.
    A good document setting up a load balanced environment is the Enterprise Deployment Guide. Chapter 8 describes the tasks for a Forms environment.
    Regards,
    Martin

  • ACE module not load balancing across two servers

    We are seeing an issue in a context on one of our load balancers where an application doesn't appear to be load balancing correctly across the two real servers.  At various times the application team is seeing active connections on only one real server.  They see no connection attempts on the other server.  The ACE sees both servers as up and active within the serverfarm.  However, a show serverfarm confirms that the load balancer sees current connections only going to one of the servers.  The issue is fixed by restarting the application on the server that is not receiving any connections.  However, it reappears again.  And which server experiences the issue moves back and forth between the two real servers, so it is not limited to just one of the servers.
    The application vendor wants to know why the load balancer is periodically not sending traffic to one of the servers.  I'm kind of curious myself.  Does anyone have some tips on where we can look next to isolate the cause?
    We're running A2(3.3).  The ACE module was upgraded to that version of code on a Friday, and this issue started the following Monday.  The ACE has 28 contexts configured, and this one context is the only one reporting any issues since the upgrade.
    Here are the show serverfarm statistics as of today:
    ACE# show serverfarm farma-8000
    serverfarm     : farma-8000, type: HOST
    total rservers : 2
                                                    ----------connections-----------
           real                  weight state        current    total      failures
       ---+---------------------+------+------------+----------+----------+---------
       rserver: server#1
           x.x.x.20:8000      8      OPERATIONAL  0          186617     3839
       rserver: server#2
           x.x.x.21:8000      8      OPERATIONAL  67         83513      1754

    Are you enabling sticky feature? What kind of predictor are you using?
    If sticky feature is enabled and one rserver goes down, traffic will leans to one side.
    Even after the rserver retuns to up, traffic may continue to lean due to sticky feature.
    The behavior seems to depend on the configuration.
    So, please let me know a part of configuration?
    Regards,
    Yuji

  • Having an issue with vpn load balancing certificate on the vip

                       Hi all,
    I am setting up vpn load balancing in a lab. I have two asa's running 8.6. I created a ucc cert from our internal CA  that has the vip as the CN in the cert and the two ASA's themselves as subject alternative names. I used open ssl to create the request. In each asa I am using encryption between the ASA's to encrypt the psk's. Since this is a lab and I do not have the DNS servers at my disposal I've added the hostnames and addresses of each ASA to the config in the ASA's. The problem I have is that when I connect to the vip I get a cert error saying the cert doesn't match the name on the site. See below:
    "The security certificate presented by this website was issued for a different website's address."
    I have a hostfile on my lab pc connected directly to the outside of the ASA that can resolve the name of the vip but when I browse to the vip I get the cert error. If I click proceed anyway the asa redirects me and the page opens without error on one of the two ASA's.
    Does any one know what the CN of the cert should be for vpn load balancing. I thought the CN would be the vip but sometinhg is not right.
    Any help is appreciated.
    Thanks.

    Issue resolved. Switched the order of the trustpoints on the outside and vpn load balance.

  • Cisco load balancer with Real to VIP mapping ?

    Hi ,
    brief about the setup -
    Client IP x  - Virtual server IP y = Real server IP's A , B ,C 
    I know that by SLB we can map traffic originating from Client IP x to VIP y towards any of real server IP's (A,B,C).
    I want to know how we can map traffic originating from Real server IP's(A,B,C) so that when it reaches Client IP x the source IP should be VIP y.  
    Please can some body help with this query !!!!

    If the real server's default gateway is to the load balancer, whatever that object may be, you could be able to source NAT to the VIP address.  With real load balancer I.e. F5's / ACE / netscaler, it's very easy to manipulate the packets and traffic flow

  • ACE 4710 HTTPS load balance configuration

    Have two ACE 4710 in HA setup. We would like to setup HTTPS loadbalance(actually just a primary and standby configuration in the serverfarm). Initially this would be for Exchange OWA connections but may expand to more HTTPS connections later.
    I know there are several ways to do SSL with the ACE( client, server, end-to-end). I am just wanting to know the easiest way to deploy this? Is a certificate always needed on the ACE for each connection? In HA mode would a certificate be needed for both or does it replicate in some way to the other ACE?
    Any configuration examples would be helpful.
    Thanks.

    IF you terminate SSL on the ACE you need certificates and key on ace in the context in which you are doing the termination. The certs and keys need to be installed on the active and standby (manually unless using anm to manage).
    when speaking of SSL
    SSL termination refers to ace terminating SSL and sending to server as clear text
    end to end - ACE terminates SSL (to look into payload to make a loadbalance decision or sticky decision) and then re-encrypts to the server, so to the client ACE is an ssl server and to the server the ace is an ssl client.
    You can find some config examples at
    http://docwiki.cisco.com/wiki/Category:Data_Center_Application_Services_Configuration_Examples

  • ACE 4710 server load balancing on ACE with routed model.

    Hi experts,
    Pls help me...i need server laod balance on ACE4710 with routed model sample configuration or configuration guide....thanks in advance....

    Here you go

  • Using ACE to load balance HTTP/S traffic between client & proxy server using tcp 8080

    Folks,
    I have a scenario where ACE is in load balancing connections to a bunch of Websense servers in a one-armed topology.  ACE presents a single VIP to web browser clients and each client's browser proxy configuration is populated with the VIP DNS name.  Traffic then gets load balanced between the Websense servers.  The problem arises due to Websense requiring the 'X-Forwarded-For' HTTP header in order to obtain the source IP of the client.  
    ACE inserts this header into the standard HTTP 'proxied' traffic but doing this for HTTPS traffic has required the configuration of the ACE SSL proxy client server.
    So the problem I have is this:
    How to configure ACE to load balance both HTTP & HTTPS applications using a single VIP and tcp port number ie tcp 8080
    The ACE hardware being used is ACE20-MOD-K9  -  MODULE
    I have attempted to use a L7 class map to match all ciphers and attach this to a L7 Policy-Map but the documentation highlights the fact the 'match cipher' configuration is only available on the ACE appliance.  
    I believe I am on the correct track.  The HTTPS traffic must be identified and used to match against PolicyA and HTTP traffic matched against PolicyB
    I'm looking for ideas!  I'm hopeful someone must have solved this problem previously!!
    Regards,
    Simon

    Hi Simon,
    The classification has to work on different ports. Whether client types http or https doesn't matter to client. His request will reach VIP which will classify the traffic based on port, protocol first and then it can look into further detail to send the traffic to appropriate serverfarm.
    You can class-map match-any xxxxx
    2 match virtual-address x.x.x.x tcp any
    and then you configure further classification on the basis of L7 like  url, header etc. 
    But again, you will still need SSL termination on ACE.
    Regards,
    Kanwal
    Note: Please mark answers if they are helpful.

  • Load Balance https based on url

    I am trying to configure ACE 4710 to load balance base on the URL, If it matches the specific URL ( /456/ ), the traffic will be sent to server farm 456 else the traffic will be sent to server farm 123.
    I attached an image of the topology.
    Ace Config:
    rserver host SRV01_123
      ip address 192.168.1.101
      inservice
    rserver host SRV02_123
      ip address 192.168.1.102
      inservice
    rserver host SRV01_456
      ip address 192.168.1.111
      inservice
    serverfarm host farm_123
      rserver SRV01_123
        inservice
      rserver SRV02_123
        inservice
    serverfarm host farm_456
      rserver SRV01_456
        inservice
    class-map match-all VIP_Application
      2 match virtual-address 192.168.1.10 tcp eq https
    class-map type http loadbalance match-all L7_server_456
      2 match http url /456/
    policy-map type loadbalance http first-match LB_Application
      class L7_server_456
        serverfarm farm_456
      class class-default
        serverfarm farm_123
    policy-map multi-match ServerGroup1_PM
      class VIP_Application
        loadbalance vip inservice
        loadbalance policy LB_Application
        loadbalance vip icmp-reply
    interface vlan 70
      bridge-group 1
      no shutdown
    interface vlan 700
      bridge-group 1
      service-policy input ServerGroup1_PM
      no shutdown
    Thanks

    Hi John,
    If you want to do the offload in the ACE also called SSL termination, it is a two step process:
    1- You need to upload your certificate and key to the ACE using FTP or one of the available methods.
    2- Create the the SSL proxy service where you add these two files and finally add this service under the policy-multimatch for the VIP in question.
    You also need to decide whether you want to keep your server listening in the encrypted port (that would be a two way encryption process called End-to-End SSL) or you can change the port to 80 and leave all the decyption process to the ACE (this would be transparent to the client, the site will show up as HTTPS all the time).
    Here you can take a look at the SSL termination process (using clear text port in the backend servers).
    Oficial Configuration Example
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/docs/app_ntwk_services/data_center_app_services/ace_appliances/vA4_1_0/configuration/ssl/guide/terminat.html
    Cisco Wiki Example
    http://docwiki.cisco.com/wiki/SSL_Termination_on_the_Cisco_Application_Control_Engine_Without_an_Existing_Chained_Certificate_and_Key_in_Routed_Mode_Configuration_Example
    HTH
    Pablo

Maybe you are looking for

  • Add View of one component in another component

    HI All, I need to show view "TextView" of component SRQM_NOTES in component BT116IT_SRVO. That is: i would like to show text for each Item of a particular order. How can I do that? Add View to a certain ViewSet / Change a configuration / add view to

  • Skin is drawing on top of components

    I have a skin with HostComponent of SkinnableContainer. It looks like this: <s:BitmapImage source="@Embed(source='/img/skinGraphics/footer.png')" />     <s:Group id="contentGroup">     </s:Group> The skinnable container looks like this: <s:SkinnableC

  • An Error in the Installation of PS CS2 on Windows 7

    I haven't seen this issued addressed here on the forums yet, and I've been trolling for awhile Here's my problem: I recently upgraded my Windows Vista OS to Windows 7 (my computer is fully upgraded as far as I know since it's practically new too). Du

  • Certified with Oracle 9i or 10g

    Hi all, I m new to database ... hence would appreciate expertise from on which certification to pursue? My concern is 9i going to obsolete soon? Thanks

  • ITunes purchased TV shows/sports events skip

    audio and video skip and lag when laptop is unplugged, whenever i unplug my laptop, no matter what size i play it. when plugged in, it plays seamlessly. one of the mac geniuses said it was because of low ram, but I have 1.5 GB and 1.67 GHz PowerPC G4