Invoice not going in block

Hi all ,
I have created an invoice with following parameters
Base amount : 100  tax percent is 10 % so idealy teh invoice would be for 110 usd
but i creted invoice 120 USD 100 as base and tax amount as 20% invoice dint go for block
how do i block invoice when tax amount is increased beyond the expected value.
Regards,
Madhavi Solanki

guys i want the invoice to be blocked if the tax amount is increased than normal one.
eg
PO is for 10qty rs 10 /ea at 0.00 tax rate
GR done for 10 qty @ 10 rs ( for whole aty )
IR done for 1 qty @ 10rs/each but follwing information was entered
Amount : 11 Rs
Tax amount 1 rs instead of 0 and teh invoice dint go for block although PP tolerance is maintained with 2% upper limit & 5% lower limit.
So i want the system to check teh variance on tax amount and put the invoice on block

Similar Messages

  • MIRO.......Quality doc not going into block

    Hi,
    When we are posting invoice through MIRO against materials in Quality its not going into payment block..
    We maintaing everything from QM point of view, control keys and select block invoice options.
    we are unable to trace/ fine the settting related from FICO.
    Can any body guide me.
    Regards,
    Venkat

    hi
    In MM02,
    Quality management view,
    Activate "QM in Procurement is Active"
    Enter QM control key - "0007" i.e. Del. release, invoice block
    U have to also maintain QM Info Record, use QI01
    Test 1 complete cycle PO > GR > LIV
    It will start working
    Regards

  • Closing invoice not going to FICO (downpayment has alreaydy been cleared)

    HI
    We have sales cases, where down payment request is already done and cleared.
    When closing invoice is made it's not going into FICO and gives message "Downpayment is alreaydy cleared and cannot be used in offsetting). Reseting clearing document in FBRA seems not to be an option here because clearing document has been used to clear other customer sales also. Do you know any other way to get closing invoice done and posted to FICO?

    Message no. F5847
    Check note 213567.  You may also refer to note 199571 which may also helpful to you though it is not related to this error message but related to Down Payment.
    thanks
    G. Lakshmipathi

  • Invoice not going for second level approval

    i have an issue , gurus
    there is a invoice which should go through two level of approvals we have built a customised workflow for that , at the fist level there are say 5 approvers who can approve then at the second level there are again 3 , any one among them can approve the invoice at any level , and thereafter he work item gets deleted from the the remaing agents' inbox , now th issue is that after one among the first level approvers approves , it again comes back to him for approval without going to the next level .
    what can be the problem and what is the solution , if any one can help me ..

    Hi,
    It is related to workflow issue .Please check in SWIA
    please contact your ABAP (technical team)
    there is a problem in BADI
    G.Ganesh Kumar

  • Price Block across Invoices (not per invoice)

    Guys
    Do you know of a way to implement price block on the PO level? PP price block is per invoice, is there another way i can set it up so that all invoices are looked at for price block not at a per invoice level?
    Using PP: I can have many invoices, all can potentially be 200 over without going into block.

    For clarification
    Lets assume i have a PO for Qty 10 and price 10000
    If i set PP block for 250, it means i can post
    Invoice 1: Qty 1, price 1200
    Invoice 2: Qty 1, price 1200
    Invoice 3: qty 1 , Price 1200 .. and so on
    Now if i see none of these invoices go into price block - but  i have exceeded po price by 2000
    I want to setup price block such that if sum total of all 10 invoices exceeds 250, it should go into price block.
    Any ideas?

  • Flow is not going to catch block when JMS adapter fails

    In a BPEL composite, we have a JMS adapter to write a message into JMS Queue.
    In this error scenario, JMS is down & so JMS adapter fails with the below error. But control is not going to the catch block where we have some logic to construct a error response. Why?
    Global retry rollback fault thrown.
    The current JTA transaction is aborting due to an user rollback fault being thrown. The upstream component should retry in a new JTA transaction upon catching this fault.
    This exception was caused by a global retry fault being thrown from downstream component. The user had directed the BPEL engine to roll back the current JTA transaction and retry within new JTA transactions for the specified number of times and retry interval.
    There is no action recommended.
    BINDING.JCA-12563
    Exception occured when binding was invoked.
    Exception occured during invocation of JCA binding: "JCA Binding execute of Reference operation 'Produce_Message' failed due to: ERRJMS_PROVIDER_ERR.
    ERRJMS_PROVIDER_ERR.
    Unable to produce message due to JMS provider internal error.
    Please examine the log file to determine the problem.
    The invoked JCA adapter raised a resource exception.
    Please examine the above error message carefully to determine a resolution.

    Hi,
    This is similar to JTA issue from below post.
    CatchAll block not catching JTA timeout with XA datasource. Try the suggestion given by Riaan and see if it helps.
    Regards,
    Sai

  • Payment Term from Vendor is not going to Freight PO

    Hello All,
    I am not MM consulting but I need to solve a problem.
    As we know when I save a shipment cost document SAP creates a automatically PO for carrier as the configuration.
    I have the payment terms registered in the Vendor Master (Carrier) but when I save my ship cost document and the system creates the PO the payment terms it is not appearing in the PO and consequently is not going to MIRO.
    How should I do to take the Vendor Payment Term to the Freight PO?
    Thanks
    Marcos

    Hi,
       Ensure that the payment terms is maintained in the purchasing view in MK02 for the same purchasing organization.
       If its maintained, the same will be displayed in the automatic PO as well. If its not copied, please create a normal PO in ME21N and check whether the payment term is displayed in header - Delivery / Invoice tab.
       If you are in old release, refer the note: 358506 - Auto Service PO Creation - Passing Values into the Function
       If you are using TM system, refer the note: 1897588 - Payment terms not copied from Vendor master to PO
        If the notes are not valid, then you may check for OSS notes or raise an OSS ticket to SAP.
    Regards,
    AKPT

  • Overdue invoice not included in Dunning Wizard

    Some overdue invoices are not being presented in the dunning wizard results even though all criteria appear to have been met. (version 8.82). For a selected business partner and invoice, the Block Dunning is set to "No" on the business partner and the invoice (INV6). The invoice due date is 2/10/13. We only have one dunning level that has 30/60/90 days. For this customer, all other invoices come up except this invoice. The last dunning run was 7/2/2013.
    Any ideas of things to look for?
    Thanks.
    Alan

    Hi Gordon, According to SAP documentation the requirements are:
    1) Dunning definitions have to be set in the database
    2) Business Partner Master Data and in the A/R Invoice -> Logistics tab, the Block Dunning Letters option is not ticked
    3) A/R Invoice meets the criteria specified in the Steps 2, 3 and 4 of the Dunning Wizard function
    4) A/R Invoice meets the ‘Dunning Level’ criteria specified in the Dunning Term window
    I have double checked and all these requirements have been met. The invoice still isn't showing. Is there a query that will replicate what SAP is doing?

  • STO Stock not going to receive

    Dear All,
    I have raised STO, created delivery and done PGI.   Now stock is in Transit whcih can be tracked sing MB5T.
    Due to accident this stock is not going to receive by receving plant.  How to handle this situtation as the stock will always shows in trasit for ever, how can I clear this.
    Apart from this we are going to claim for the same from trasport vendor.  How to account it.
    Rgds
    Srini.

    Hi,
    Before you do the scraping of the material from stock in transit, you will have to check with the finance guys about where to account the scrap i.e.which business area or profit center. Weather it should be for the sending plant or for the receiving plant.
    If you are accounting the value of good for the sending plant then you can reverse the PGI transaction and scrap the material.
    If you are accounting the value of goods for the receiving plant then you have to receive the material and then scrap.
    About claim from transport vendor, depending on the case to case basis. you can raise a credit note during invoice verification (only if the vendor agrees) This purely depends on the client requirement.
    Regards
    Srinivas.P

  • Incoming invoice not get posted through workflow

    Hi Experts,
    I am working on workflows for incoming invoice used by bus2081. i am facing the problem when the user clicks on post button after verifying the invoice the workitem not posted .and is it showing debit and credit miss match . while posting it with out workflow the document was posted with out error even debit credit miss match
    please give me the solution to overcome from this problem .
    Thanks
    Sreenath

    Hi,
    It seems to be authorisation issue.
    Compare the invoice values which user is able to approve and not.
    Maybe he doesn't have enough authorisation limit to post those invoices.
    Ask him to do it from SBWP backend inbox.
    If it is not going from his inbox means, check the SU53 t code after he clicks on post button.
    Then see in SU53 whether any authorisation is missing.
    It's not a workflow issue. If there is an issue in workflow means, he should not be able to post any invoices.
    Cheers,
    Raja.D

  • Messages are not going through in my Ipad. I have upgraded to ios5

    My messages are not going through in my ipad. Recently I upgraded to OS to ios5. It says not delivered.

    Try calling *228 and choose option 1 to reset the 0's and 1's on the device.
    Is there a setting on her phone that she may have triggered in her contact for you by accident to block your texts

  • Form not going in Query mode

    hello freinds, Happy Christmas ..!
    i have a Master_Detail form, FORM2
    "LN_HEAD" table, that has 3 primary key;
    ln_code
    ln_no
    ln_emp_code
    "LN_DET" table has foreign key; Relation is set at form design time.
    lnd_ln_code
    lnd_ln_no
    lnd_ln_emp_code
    Form2 is called from Form1 on press of a button "bt1"
    When-BT1_press, i am only initializing :GLOBAL.LN_CODE = 'LCD'
    in FORM2 PRE-FORM
    I am initializing LN_CODE := :GLOBAL.LN_CODE and setting initial value property of the field LN_CODE to :GLOBAL.LN_CODE
    when the form displayed for the first time,,and i press F7 or Query button,form is going in field LN_EMP_CODE and
    asking me to enter LN_EMP_CODE, as it is required field.
    i also tried settng LN_EMP_CODE required property to false at design time and at WNFI, but then its firing WVI of LN_EMP_CODE
    and raises form-failure message "emp does not exists'.
    at form and ln_head block level i gave trigeer KEY-ENTQRY
    CLEAR_RECORD;
    CLEAR_BLOCK(NO_VALIDATE);
    ENTER_QUERY;
    but still not going in query mode. whats the matter? Has any1 face this issue before?
    please advice me.
    *on my form; 1st field is LN_DATE, 2nd LN_APPLY_DATE, 3rd LN_NO (auto-generated, enabled property set false at WNFI) and*
    *4rth is LN_EMP_CODE*

    I am initializing LN_CODE := :GLOBAL.LN_CODEWhat is LN_CODE in this initialization? Is it an item in one of the blocks of your form?

  • Could not read boot block (input/output errror) powerbook g4

    Hello
    My friend gave me a powerbook g4 and a copy of osx lion, I would like to install it but the internal hardive is not available within the "select Destination" area of the  installation process. I tried to repair the disk which is labelled Disk0s1, but shortly after it is underway i recieve this message.
    **/dev/disk0s1 could not read boot block (input/output error) Error: The underlying task reported failure on exit. 1 non HFS volume checked, 1 volume could not be repaired because of an error.
    Within disk utilities the Disk01s is grey, I can try to repair it but the above error occurs. Do you know what the problem is and how I can fix it?

    Since you are going to install system fresh, it sounds like, you should erase the drive.  Boot from the installer disc, then select the language but do not start the installer.  From the menu bar, you should have either an Applications or an Installer menu. From one of the menus, you can then start Disk Utility.
    From the drives and volumes pane, select the internal drive hardware listing. 
    This will now allow you to partition or erase the disc.  Now click the Erase tab and select Mac OS Extended (Journaled) as the format and then click the "Erase" button.  You can name the volume that will actually be created, like for instance "MacintoshHD" or whatever you want.)
    Once the erase has completed, you need to check the information for the hard drive at the bottom of the window.  Be sure that the partition scheme is Apple Partition Map.  If for some reason it is something else, like GUID, you won't be able to install MacOS on it.  You will need to click the Partition tab, click the "Options..." button and select Apple Partition Map, then click the "Partition" button.
    Once this is done, then you can quit Disk Utility and you should be able to install Tiger on that HD.

  • MRBR - Invoice not automatically released

    Hi
    I have the following scenario
    PO raised for qty 1 value 100
    GR completed for qt1 value 100
    Invoice created for qty 1 value 110
    The invoice is automatically blocked which is correct, then a credit note is entered in MIRO for 10.
    Now when I run MRBR with the auto release option the invoice is not unblocked, do you know why this is is the case?
    thanks Joe

    Hi,
    Do refer the below KBA, which explains you why MRBR not released the Invoice with credit memo and corresponding solution.
    KBA: 1781064 - MRBR transaction not releasing payment block on credit memo
    You may also can have a look on below KBA's which may help you..
    1906013 - FI Block can not be released via MRBR
    1790472 - MRBR - Invoices not released Automatically

  • Texts not going through to only one number

    I tried looking at the other answers but none of them worked. I have a Env3 and the person i'm trying to send messages to has verizon also and ive been texting him before with no problem. My number isnt blocked or anything like that. I tried the reprogramming things and taking the battery out but my messages still wont go through. They just are still sending and not received. Sometimes they went through hours after but now theyre not going through at all. Thanks for the help

    I'm having the same issue on my Blackberry 9330.  Seems to happen to 1 or 2 specific numbers.  I cannot send a new message or reply to a message sent to me from that number. Receiving messages works fine. The number i'm sending to is using Verizon Wireless as well.  I have reprogrammed and removed the battery,
    Help!!

Maybe you are looking for