IPV6 BGP session between ASR (IOS-XR 5.1.2 SP4) to MX480 (JUNOS 11.4R6.6)

Hi,
We're in the process of changing route-reflectors and have run into an interoperability problem between Cisco IOS-XR and Junos 11.4R6.6 on the MX-480 that Juniper is currently in the process of looking at.  V4 works like a charm and the sessions come up immediately.  The same may be said for both V4/V6 on other MX series devices (i.e. the MX5).
Not wishing to go into too many details, I have two questions:
1.  Has anyone else encountered this problem?  And if so,
2. Have you identified a viable workaround without upgrading the MX480 to a newer version of Junos?
Doing a hard clear of the session other on the Juniper or Cisco side 10 to 15 times produces a connect most of the time, though it can take longer sometimes.  Unhappily this is not viable option and upgrading from 11.4.R6.6 to 12.3R8.7 would require some very complicated planning.
Kind regards,
Andrew

I have similar problem. Did you manage to resolve the BGP-LU prefixes received over eBGP session? In my case as well all looks OK (eBGP LU session up, prefixes with labels exchanged, routing table looks OK), with the exception of CEF:
RP/0/0/CPU0:02-ASBR2#show cef 172.16.20.2/32 detail 
Thu Jul  3 14:48:04.746 UTC
172.16.20.2/32, version 393, drop adjacency, internal 0x4004001 0x0 (ptr 0xacba7fa4) [1], 0x0 (0xacba2640), 0x10 (0xacc33754)
 Updated Jul  3 14:14:07.206
 Prefix Len 32, traffic index 0, precedence n/a, priority 4
  gateway array (0xacb63e7c) reference count 18, flags 0xf2, source rib (6), 0 backups
                [7 type 5 flags 0x210101 (0xacc38048) ext 0x0 (0x0)]
  LW-LDI[type=5, refc=3, ptr=0xacba2640, sh-ldi=0xacc38048]
   via 10.9.0.3, 0 dependencies, recursive, bgp-ext [flags 0x6020]
    path-idx 0 NHID 0x0 [0xacb0ad08 0x0]
    unresolved
     local label 16016 
     labels imposed {16001}
    Load distribution: 0 (refcount 7)
    Hash  OK  Interface                 Address
    0     Y   Unknown                   drop           

Similar Messages

  • BGP Session drops when loading routes into a VRF

    I've configured a small MPLS network with 4 P routers (ASR 1002s) 4 PE routers (6509s) and two Cisco 7206s as route reflectors.  I'm using OSPF as the routing protocol on the PE-CE interfaces and have sham links configured between PE routers.  I currently have two VRFs configured on this network, one is working fine, and there are approximately 150 routes in this VRF. 
    The second vrf is configured, it also has ospf sham links configured, neighbors up, etc.
    The problem I have is that when I bring up the first PE-CE link and load about 7000 routes into the second vrf my BGP sessions between the other PEs and route-reflectors start timing out.  I do show the vpnv4 routes show up in the route-reflectors "sh ip bgp vpnv4 rd 14017:2" I believe the debug outputs below indicate the issue is in the route-reflectors, but was curious if anyone else had seen this issue.  The BGP peering IP address for one of the route-reflectors is 10.2.0.7 and one of the session dropping PEs is 10.2.0.13.
    Normal output from "unloaded" debug ip bgp vpnv4 unicast keepalives:
    Route-reflector output:
    May 16 09:35:31   2329: May 16 09:35:30.718 CDT: BGP: ses global 10.2.0.13 (0xA0519C0:1) Keep alive timer fired.
    May 16 09:35:31   2330: May 16 09:35:30.718 CDT: BGP: 10.2.0.13 KEEPALIVE requested (bgp_keepalive_timer_expired)
    May 16 09:35:31   2331: May 16 09:35:30.718 CDT: BGP: ses global 10.2.0.13 (0xA0519C0:1) service keepalive IO request.
    May 16 09:35:31   2332: May 16 09:35:30.718 CDT: BGP: 10.2.0.13 KEEPALIVE write request serviced in BGP_IO
    PE output:
    May 16 09:35:38.421 CDT: BGP: 10.2.0.7 KEEPALIVE requested (bgp_keepalive_timer_expired)
    May 16 09:35:38.421 CDT: BGP: 10.2.0.7 KEEPALIVE sent
    Route-reflector output:
    May 16 09:35:39   2341: May 16 09:35:38.427 CDT: BGP: 10.2.0.13 received KEEPALIVE, length (excl. header) 0
    Same output but during a "loaded" condition:
    Route-reflector output:
    May 15 20:41:31   774: May 15 20:41:31.015 CDT: BGP: ses global 10.2.0.13 (0xA091324:1) Keep alive timer fired.
    May 15 20:41:31   775: May 15 20:41:31.015 CDT: BGP: 10.2.0.13 KEEPALIVE requested (bgp_keepalive_timer_expired)
    May 15 20:41:31   778: May 15 20:41:31.015 CDT: BGP: ses global 10.2.0.13 (0xA091324:1) service keepalive IO request.
    May 15 20:42:29   793: May 15 20:42:28.363 CDT: BGP: ses global 10.2.0.13 (0xA091324:1) Keep alive timer fired.
    May 15 20:42:29   794: May 15 20:42:28.363 CDT: BGP: 10.2.0.13 KEEPALIVE requested (bgp_keepalive_timer_expired)
    May 15 20:43:23   805: May 15 20:43:22.638 CDT: BGP: ses global 10.2.0.13 (0xA091324:1) Keep alive timer fired.
    May 15 20:43:23   806: May 15 20:43:22.638 CDT: BGP: 10.2.0.13 KEEPALIVE requested (bgp_keepalive_timer_expired)
    May 15 20:43:33   813: May 15 20:43:33.934 CDT: %BGP-3-NOTIFICATION: received from neighbor 10.2.0.13 4/0 (hold time expired) 0 bytes
    PE output:
    May 15 20:43:33.927 CDT: %BGP-3-NOTIFICATION: sent to neighbor 10.2.0.7 4/0 (hold time expired) 0 bytes
    May 15 20:43:33.927 CDT: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 10.2.0.7 Down BGP Notification sent
    Route-reflector output:
    May 15 20:43:34   814: May 15 20:43:33.934 CDT: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 10.2.0.13 Down BGP Notification received
    It appears to me that we are missing "BGP: 10.2.0.13 KEEPALIVE write request serviced in BGP_IO"
    For full disclosure there are other BGP keep-alive events going on to the other PEs at this time, some passing, some failing.
    route-reflector info:
    route-reflector1#sh inv
    NAME: "Chassis", DESCR: "Cisco 7206VXR, 6-slot chassis"
    PID: CISCO7206VXR      , VID:    , SN: 37050753
    NAME: "NPE-G2 0", DESCR: "Cisco 7200 Series Network Processing Engine NPE-G2"
    PID: NPE-G2            , VID: V03 , SN: JAF1410AADM
    NAME: "disk2", DESCR: "256MB Compact Flash Disk for NPE-G2"
    PID: MEM-NPE-G2-FLD256 , VID:    , SN:
    NAME: "Power Supply 1", DESCR: "Cisco 7200 AC Power Supply"
    PID: PWR-7200-AC       , VID:    , SN:
    NAME: "Power Supply 2", DESCR: "Cisco 7200 AC Power Supply"
    PID: PWR-7200-AC       , VID:    , SN:
    route-reflector1#sh ver
    Cisco IOS Software, 7200 Software (C7200P-ADVIPSERVICESK9-M), Version 15.1(4)M5, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
    Technical Support: http://www.cisco.com/techsupport
    Copyright (c) 1986-2012 by Cisco Systems, Inc.
    Compiled Tue 04-Sep-12 19:41 by prod_rel_team
    ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 12.4(12.2r)T, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
    BOOTLDR: Cisco IOS Software, 7200 Software (C7200P-BOOT-M), Version 15.1(4)M5, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
    route-reflector1 uptime is 15 weeks, 20 hours, 43 minutes
    System returned to ROM by reload at 11:03:48 UTC Thu Jan 31 2013
    System restarted at 12:37:52 CST Thu Jan 31 2013
    System image file is "disk2:c7200p-advipservicesk9-mz.151-4.M5.bin"
    Any thoughts on this problem would be greatly appreciated.

    Hi again,
    did you check this?
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk365/technologies_configuration_example09186a008010a28a.shtml
    I honestly do not remember the defaults in Cisco but I had a very similar issue working with Juniper because of this value was set @ about 4500 prefixes at once.
    Take care
    Alessio
    Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPad App

  • Advertising ipv4 routes via ipv6 bgp peers

    Hello,
    I have established IPV6 bgp sessions with ipv6 prefix-list filter. But ipv4 routes were advertised over this bgp session. Do I I need special configuration under address family or ipv4 prefix-list filters required ?
    Note : the config was  IBGP between 7200 routers and 6509 core switches.
    Thank you all
    Nael

    Hi Nael,
    This is because address-family ipv4 unicast gets activated by default when you configure a new neighbor in BGP. You either need to configure "no bgp default ipv4-unicast" or go under address-family ipv4 unicast and do a "no neighbor" for the ipv6 neighbor.
    Hope this helps

  • Link Local BGP peering between Cisco and Juniper (M-Series)

    Hi,
    has anybody successfully managed to get a working IPv6 session between a Cisco and a Juniper router using Link Local IPs?
    I got it working between two cisco routers and two Juniper Routers but not with the two different vendors.
    Configuration on the Juniper site:
       family inet6 {
           address FE80::1/64;
      protocols {
          bgp {
              group customer_ipv6 {
                  neighbor fe80::2 {
                      local-interface at-2/0/0.119;
                      peer-as 65300;
                      as-override;
    Configuration on the Cisco site:
    interface ATM0/0/0.1 point-to-point
    bandwidth 2033
    ip address 10.194.235.42 255.255.255.252
    ip access-group AL-SECURITY-WAN out
    ip mtu 1500
    ipv6 address FE80::2 link-local
    ipv6 enable
    bfd interval 999 min_rx 999 multiplier 15
    pvc 1/32
      vbr-nrt 2244 2244 1
      tx-ring-limit 3
      encapsulation aal5snap
    router bgp 65300
    bgp router-id 10.213.58.185
    bgp log-neighbor-changes
    no bgp default ipv4-unicast
    neighbor FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 remote-as 65300
    neighbor FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 version 4
    neighbor FE80::2%GigabitEthernet0/1 remote-as 65300
    neighbor FE80::2%GigabitEthernet0/1 version 4
    address-family ipv4
    exit-address-family
    address-family ipv6
      neighbor FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 activate
      neighbor FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 advertisement-interval 5
      neighbor FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 soft-reconfiguration inbound
      neighbor FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 route-map NH6 out
      neighbor FE80::2%GigabitEthernet0/1 activate
      neighbor FE80::2%GigabitEthernet0/1 advertisement-interval 5
      neighbor FE80::2%GigabitEthernet0/1 soft-reconfiguration inbound
      neighbor FE80::2%GigabitEthernet0/1 route-map NH6 out
    exit-address-family
    CE_HOSTNAME# show ip bgp ipv6 uni su
    BGP router identifier 10.213.58.185, local AS number 65300
    BGP table version is 7, main routing table version 7
    4 network entries using 656 bytes of memory
    4 path entries using 320 bytes of memory
    1/1 BGP path/bestpath attribute entries using 128 bytes of memory
    2 BGP AS-PATH entries using 48 bytes of memory
    2 BGP community entries using 48 bytes of memory
    0 BGP route-map cache entries using 0 bytes of memory
    0 BGP filter-list cache entries using 0 bytes of memory
    BGP using 1200 total bytes of memory
    BGP activity 34/12 prefixes, 38/12 paths, scan interval 60 secs
    Neighbor        V           AS MsgRcvd MsgSent   TblVer  InQ OutQ Up/Down  State/PfxRcd
    FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1
                    4        65300       0       0        1    0    0 never    Idle
    FE80::2%GigabitEthernet0/1
                    4        65300      15      16        7    0    0 00:10:59        4
    CE_HOSTNAME#
    The console monitoring states the following:
    Nov 10 06:30:33.023 MET: %BGP-3-NOTIFICATION: sent to neighbor FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 active 2/7 (unsupported/disjoint capability) 0 bytes
    Nov 10 06:30:33.023 MET: %BGP-4-MSGDUMP: unsupported or mal-formatted message received from FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1:
    FFFF FFFF FFFF FFFF FFFF FFFF FFFF FFFF 001D 0104 505A 005A 52D2 C023 00
    Nov 10 06:30:33.023 MET: %BGP-3-NOTIFICATION: received from neighbor FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 active 2/5 (authentication failure) 0 bytes
    de-ipc-ulmdon-ce-02#
    Nov 10 06:30:33.023 MET: %BGP_SESSION-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 IPv6 Unicast topology base removed from session  BGP Notification sent
    The Cisco Router is running IOS 15.2, the Juniper Site JunOS 10.4
    Any Ideas how I can get this to work?
    Thanks in advance!

    Marcin,
    I updated the debugging log, the previous one was created using override-capability-neg on the neighbor (experimental).
    >>0) Do you see similar scenario for working session? (Between two Cisco routers)
    The working connection between two cisco routers doesn't show any output
    >>1) What verion of IOS are you running? Something failrly recent I hope?
    Show Version:
    Cisco IOS Software, C1900 Software (C1900-UNIVERSALK9-M), Version 15.2(1)T1, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
    Technical Support: http://www.cisco.com/techsupport
    Copyright (c) 1986-2011 by Cisco Systems, Inc.
    Compiled Mon 19-Sep-11 16:24 by prod_rel_team
    ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 15.0(1r)M9, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
    CE_HOSTNAME uptime is 2 weeks, 5 days, 21 hours, 35 minutes
    System returned to ROM by reload at 18:43:21 MET(S) Fri Oct 21 2011
    System restarted at 18:44:50 MET(S) Fri Oct 21 2011
    System image file is "flash:c1900-universalk9-mz.SPA.152-1.T1.bin"
    Last reload type: Normal Reload
    Last reload reason: Reload Command
    This product contains cryptographic features and is subject to United
    States and local country laws governing import, export, transfer and
    use. Delivery of Cisco cryptographic products does not imply
    third-party authority to import, export, distribute or use encryption.
    Importers, exporters, distributors and users are responsible for
    compliance with U.S. and local country laws. By using this product you
    agree to comply with applicable laws and regulations. If you are unable
    to comply with U.S. and local laws, return this product immediately.
    A summary of U.S. laws governing Cisco cryptographic products may be found at:
    http://www.cisco.com/wwl/export/crypto/tool/stqrg.html
    If you require further assistance please contact us by sending email to
    [email protected].
    Cisco CISCO1941/K9 (revision 1.0) with 446464K/77824K bytes of memory.
    Processor board ID FCZ1504C0G8
    1 DSL controller
    2 Gigabit Ethernet interfaces
    1 ATM interface
    1 terminal line
    DRAM configuration is 64 bits wide with parity disabled.
    255K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory.
    250880K bytes of ATA System CompactFlash 0 (Read/Write)
    License Info:
    License UDI:
    Device#   PID                   SN
    *0        CISCO1941/K9          FCZ1504C0G8
    Technology Package License Information for Module:'c1900'
    Technology    Technology-package           Technology-package
                  Current       Type           Next reboot
    ipbase        ipbasek9      Permanent      ipbasek9
    security      None          None           None
    data          datak9        Permanent      datak9
    Configuration register is 0x2102
    >>2) Can we have some more info from Juniper side (logs/debugs).
    Sadly not. The Juniper Traceoptions don't show anything
    All I can offer you at this point is the neighbor show command:
    user@Juniper> show bgp neighbor fe80::2 instance vrf-test
    Peer: fe80::2 AS 65300         Local: unspecified AS 20570
      Type: External    State: Idle           Flags:
      Last State: NoState       Last Event: NoEvent
      Last Error: None
      Export: [ pol-standard-bgp-export ] Import: [ pol-standard-bgp-import ]
      Options:
      Options:
      Address families configured: inet6-unicast
      Path-attributes dropped:  128
      Holdtime: 90 Preference: 170
      Number of flaps: 0
      Trace options:  all
      Trace file: /var/log/bgp_ipv6_ll_20111110 size 131072 files 10
    user@Juniper> show bgp summary instance vrf-test
    Groups: 2 Peers: 2 Down peers: 1
    Table          Tot Paths  Act Paths Suppressed    History Damp State    Pending
    vrf-2.inet.0          37         16          0          0          0          0
    vrf-.inet6.0           0          0          0          0          0          0
    vrf-24.mdt.0           0          0          0          0          0          0
    Peer                     AS      InPkt     OutPkt    OutQ   Flaps Last Up/Dwn State|#Active/Received/Accepted/Damped...
    10.194.235.42         65300       1149       1076       0       1     8:44:00 Establ
      vrf-test.inet.0: 6/7/7/0
    fe80::2               65300          0          0       0       0     9:38:32 Idle
    >>3)
    CE_HOSTNAME#
    Nov 10 15:35:49.574 MET: BGP: ses global 10.194.235.41 (0x2970EDA4:1) Keep alive timer fired.
    Nov 10 15:35:49.574 MET: BGP: 10.194.235.41 KEEPALIVE requested (bgp_keepalive_timer_expired)
    Nov 10 15:35:49.574 MET: BGP: ses global 10.194.235.41 (0x2970EDA4:1) service keepalive IO request.
    Nov 10 15:35:49.574 MET: BGP: 10.194.235.41 KEEPALIVE write request serviced in BGP_IO
    CE_HOSTNAME#
    Nov 10 15:35:50.598 MET: BGP: ses global FE80::2%GigabitEthernet0/1 (0x316FBDDC:1) Keep alive timer fired.
    Nov 10 15:35:50.598 MET: BGP: FE80::2%GigabitEthernet0/1 KEEPALIVE requested (bgp_keepalive_timer_expired)
    Nov 10 15:35:50.598 MET: BGP: ses global FE80::2%GigabitEthernet0/1 (0x316FBDDC:1) service keepalive IO request.
    Nov 10 15:35:50.598 MET: BGP: FE80::2%GigabitEthernet0/1 KEEPALIVE write request serviced in BGP_IO
    CE_HOSTNAME#
    Nov 10 15:35:52.850 MET: BGP: 10.194.235.41 received KEEPALIVE, length (excl. header) 0
    CE_HOSTNAME#
    Nov 10 15:35:54.694 MET: BGP: FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 active went from Idle to Active
    Nov 10 15:35:54.694 MET: BGP: FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 open active, local address FE80::2
    Nov 10 15:35:54.698 MET: BGP: ses global FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 (0x296337B4:0) act Adding topology IPv6 Unicast:base
    Nov 10 15:35:54.698 MET: BGP: ses global FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 (0x296337B4:0) act Send OPEN
    Nov 10 15:35:54.698 MET: BGP: FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 active went from Active to OpenSent
    Nov 10 15:35:54.698 MET: BGP: FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 active sending OPEN, version 4, my as: 65300, holdtime 180 seconds, ID AD53AB9
    Nov 10 15:35:54.698 MET: BGP: FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 active KEEPALIVE write request serviced in BGP_IO
    Nov 10 15:35:54.698 MET: BGP: FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 active service 2 read request in BGP_IO
    Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: BGP: FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 active KEEPALIVE write request serviced in BGP_IO
    Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: BGP: FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 active service 2 read request in BGP_IO
    Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: BGP: FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 active service 2 read request in BGP_IO
    Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: BGP: FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 active rcv message type 1, length (excl. header) 10
    Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: BGP: ses global FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 (0x296337B4:0) act Receive OPEN
    Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: BGP: FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 active rcv OPEN, version 4, holdtime 90 seconds
    Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: BGP: FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 active rcv OPEN w/ OPTION parameter len: 0
    Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: BGP: FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 active went from OpenSent to Closing
    Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: %BGP-3-NOTIFICATION: sent to neighbor FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 active 2/7 (unsupported/disjoint capability) 0 bytes
    Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: BGP: ses global FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 (0x296337B4:0) act Send NOTIFICATION 2/7 (unsupported/disjoint capability) 0 bytes
    Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: %BGP-4-MSGDUMP: unsupported or mal-formatted message received from FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1:
    FFFF FFFF FFFF FFFF FFFF FFFF FFFF FFFF 001D 0104 505A 005A 52D2 C023 00
    Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: BGP: FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 active rcv message type 3, length (excl. header) 2
    Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: %BGP-3-NOTIFICATION: received from neighbor FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 active 2/5 (authentication failure) 0 bytes
    Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: BGP: ses global FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 (0x296337B4:0) act Receive NOTIFICATION 2/5 (authentication failure) 0 bytes
    Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: BGP: FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 active bad state change from Closing to Closing
    Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: -Traceback= 21B3370Cz 21B33C74z 21B34258z
    Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: BGP: tbl IPv4 Unicast:base Service reset requests
    Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: BGP: tbl IPv6 Unicast:base Service reset requests
    Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: BGP: tbl VPNv4 Unicast:base Service reset requests
    Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: BGP: tbl VPNv6 Unicast:base Service reset requests
    Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: BGP: tbl IPv4 Multicast:base Service reset requests
    Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: BGP: nbr_topo global FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 IPv6 Unicast:base (0x296337B4:0) NSF delete stale NSF not active
    Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: BGP: nbr_topo global FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 IPv6 Unicast:base (0x296337B4:0) NSF no stale paths state is NSF not active
    Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: BGP: nbr_topo global FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 IPv6 Unicast:base (0x296337B4:0) Resetting ALL counters.
    Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: BGP: FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 active closing
    Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: BGP: ses global FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 (0x296337B4:0) act Session close and reset neighbor FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 topostate
    Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: BGP: nbr_topo global FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 IPv6 Unicast:base (0x296337B4:0) Resetting ALL counters.
    Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: BGP: FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 active went from Closing to Idle
    Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: %BGP_SESSION-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 IPv6 Unicast topology base removed from session  BGP Notification sent
    CE_HOSTNAME#CE_HOSTNAME#
    Nov 10 15:35:49.574 MET: BGP: ses global 10.194.235.41 (0x2970EDA4:1) Keep alive timer fired.
    Nov 10 15:35:49.574 MET: BGP: 10.194.235.41 KEEPALIVE requested (bgp_keepalive_timer_expired)
    Nov 10 15:35:49.574 MET: BGP: ses global 10.194.235.41 (0x2970EDA4:1) service keepalive IO request.
    Nov 10 15:35:49.574 MET: BGP: 10.194.235.41 KEEPALIVE write request serviced in BGP_IO
    CE_HOSTNAME#
    Nov 10 15:35:50.598 MET: BGP: ses global FE80::2%GigabitEthernet0/1 (0x316FBDDC:1) Keep alive timer fired.
    Nov 10 15:35:50.598 MET: BGP: FE80::2%GigabitEthernet0/1 KEEPALIVE requested (bgp_keepalive_timer_expired)
    Nov 10 15:35:50.598 MET: BGP: ses global FE80::2%GigabitEthernet0/1 (0x316FBDDC:1) service keepalive IO request.
    Nov 10 15:35:50.598 MET: BGP: FE80::2%GigabitEthernet0/1 KEEPALIVE write request serviced in BGP_IO
    CE_HOSTNAME#
    Nov 10 15:35:52.850 MET: BGP: 10.194.235.41 received KEEPALIVE, length (excl. header) 0
    CE_HOSTNAME#
    Nov 10 15:35:54.694 MET: BGP: FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 active went from Idle to Active
    Nov 10 15:35:54.694 MET: BGP: FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 open active, local address FE80::2
    Nov 10 15:35:54.698 MET: BGP: ses global FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 (0x296337B4:0) act Adding topology IPv6 Unicast:base
    Nov 10 15:35:54.698 MET: BGP: ses global FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 (0x296337B4:0) act Send OPEN
    Nov 10 15:35:54.698 MET: BGP: FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 active went from Active to OpenSent
    Nov 10 15:35:54.698 MET: BGP: FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 active sending OPEN, version 4, my as: 65300, holdtime 180 seconds, ID AD53AB9
    Nov 10 15:35:54.698 MET: BGP: FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 active KEEPALIVE write request serviced in BGP_IO
    Nov 10 15:35:54.698 MET: BGP: FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 active service 2 read request in BGP_IO
    Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: BGP: FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 active KEEPALIVE write request serviced in BGP_IO
    Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: BGP: FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 active service 2 read request in BGP_IO
    Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: BGP: FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 active service 2 read request in BGP_IO
    Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: BGP: FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 active rcv message type 1, length (excl. header) 10
    Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: BGP: ses global FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 (0x296337B4:0) act Receive OPEN
    Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: BGP: FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 active rcv OPEN, version 4, holdtime 90 seconds
    Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: BGP: FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 active rcv OPEN w/ OPTION parameter len: 0
    Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: BGP: FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 active went from OpenSent to Closing
    Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: %BGP-3-NOTIFICATION: sent to neighbor FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 active 2/7 (unsupported/disjoint capability) 0 bytes
    Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: BGP: ses global FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 (0x296337B4:0) act Send NOTIFICATION 2/7 (unsupported/disjoint capability) 0 bytes
    Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: %BGP-4-MSGDUMP: unsupported or mal-formatted message received from FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1:
    FFFF FFFF FFFF FFFF FFFF FFFF FFFF FFFF 001D 0104 505A 005A 52D2 C023 00
    Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: BGP: FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 active rcv message type 3, length (excl. header) 2
    Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: %BGP-3-NOTIFICATION: received from neighbor FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 active 2/5 (authentication failure) 0 bytes
    Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: BGP: ses global FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 (0x296337B4:0) act Receive NOTIFICATION 2/5 (authentication failure) 0 bytes
    Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: BGP: FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 active bad state change from Closing to Closing
    Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: -Traceback= 21B3370Cz 21B33C74z 21B34258z
    Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: BGP: tbl IPv4 Unicast:base Service reset requests
    Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: BGP: tbl IPv6 Unicast:base Service reset requests
    Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: BGP: tbl VPNv4 Unicast:base Service reset requests
    Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: BGP: tbl VPNv6 Unicast:base Service reset requests
    Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: BGP: tbl IPv4 Multicast:base Service reset requests
    Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: BGP: nbr_topo global FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 IPv6 Unicast:base (0x296337B4:0) NSF delete stale NSF not active
    Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: BGP: nbr_topo global FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 IPv6 Unicast:base (0x296337B4:0) NSF no stale paths state is NSF not active
    Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: BGP: nbr_topo global FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 IPv6 Unicast:base (0x296337B4:0) Resetting ALL counters.
    Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: BGP: FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 active closing
    Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: BGP: ses global FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 (0x296337B4:0) act Session close and reset neighbor FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 topostate
    Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: BGP: nbr_topo global FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 IPv6 Unicast:base (0x296337B4:0) Resetting ALL counters.
    Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: BGP: FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 active went from Closing to Idle
    Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: %BGP_SESSION-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 IPv6 Unicast topology base removed from session  BGP Notification sent
    CE_HOSTNAME#

  • Monitor BGP sessions on VRFs with XR 4.2 using SNMP

    Hello,
    I have an ASR 9006 running IOS XR 4.2 and I want to monitor some BGP sessions under VRFs using SNMP. However, when I poll the device using the OID 1.3.6.1.2.1.15.3.1.2 I only get the BGP sessions on the global VRF. I have read that I have to create 'SNMP contexts' in order to poll information about VRFs but I am not sure how to create them on XR 4.2. Do you know how to do it?
    Thanks in advance.
    David

    Hello,
    thanks to the collaboration of the engineers of Dimension Data I have managed to get it working. In case you are interested in the solution. This would be the configuration on the ASR:
    ; We create the snmp context
    snmp-server context test-ctxt
    ; We associate the context with the VRF
    snmp-server vrf vrfTest
    context test-ctxt
    ; We create the community
    snmp-server community test-com RO 1500
    ; We map the community with the context
    snmp-server community-map test-com context test-ctxt
    Now, when we poll the community associated with the context the peering sessions for that context are returned:
    $ snmpwalk -v2c -c test-com 192.168.0.1 1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.187.1.2.5.1.3
    SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.187.1.2.5.1.3.1.4.10.10.0.1 = INTEGER: 1
    On the ASR:
    #show bgp vrf vrfTest sum | b Neigh
    Wed Jun  5 08:05:26.286 UTC
    Neighbor        Spk    AS MsgRcvd MsgSent   TblVer  InQ OutQ  Up/Down  St/PfxRcd
    10.10.0.1         1 65001       0       0        0    0    0 00:00:00 Idle
    Regards

  • Jam session between iPad and Mac

    Is it possible to start a jam session between an iPad (or iphone) and Mac?

    Agreed, it must be in development because surely the good folks at Apple have the vision (or at least the common sense) to know this should've happened a long time ago. I'm sure there's a VERY good reason why creating a session between the Mac's GarageBand and the iOS GarageBand is not yet possible and that it must happen soon, right?

  • IPV6 BGP and Neighbor Discovery

    My understanding of IPv6 may not be accurate, so if there are any incorrect statements, please correct them.
    We have a requirement that prohibits FE80::/10 addresses from passing from end sites to the provider network.  FE80::/10 are the IPv6 link-local addresses.  Since link-local addresses are required Neighbor Discovery Protocol, this blocks those operations that are part of it. 
    The sites use BGP with the provider network, so can IPv6 BGP work without link-local addresses?  Is Neighbor Discovery necessary for reachability between BGP peers?

    (The below messgage is just to address the concern whether blocking LL breaks all ND, it does not tie into rest of BGP configuration) 
    Larry,
    Speaking of ND only... RFC (4861) only mandates that source IP is assigned address
    http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4861#section-4.3
    It does not mandate link-local, I have not read the updated RFC.
    I did a simple test with two devices with assigned IP addresses.
    Spoke2#ping vrf VRF 2001:db8::1 re 1Type escape sequence to abort.Sending 1, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 2001:DB8::1, timeout is 2 seconds:!Success rate is 100 percent (1/1), round-trip min/avg/max = 9/9/9 msSpoke2#*Nov 27 13:27:43.246: IPv6-Fwd: Destination lookup for 2001:DB8::1 : i/f=Ethernet0/0, nexthop=2001:DB8::1*Nov 27 13:27:43.246: IPv6-Fwd: SAS picked source 2001:DB8::FFFF for 2001:DB8::1 (Ethernet0/0)*Nov 27 13:27:43.246: ICMPv6: Sent echo request, Src=2001:DB8::FFFF, Dst=2001:DB8::1*Nov 27 13:27:43.246: IPV6: source 2001:DB8::FFFF (local)*Nov 27 13:27:43.246:       dest 2001:DB8::1 (Ethernet0/0)*Nov 27 13:27:43.246:       traffic class 0, flow 0x0, len 100+0, prot 58, hops 64, originating*Nov 27 13:27:43.246: IPv6-Fwd: Created tmp mtu cache entry for 2001:DB8::FFFF 2001:DB8::1 1E000001*Nov 27 13:27:43.246: IPv6-Fwd: Encapsulation postponed, performing resolution*Nov 27 13:27:43.250: ICMPv6: Sent N-Solicit, Src=2001:DB8::FFFF, Dst=FF02::1:FF00:1*Nov 27 13:27:43.250: IPV6: source 2001:DB8::FFFF (local)*Nov 27 13:27:43.250:       dest FF02::1:FF00:1 (Ethernet0/0)*Nov 27 13:27:43.250:       traffic class 224, flow 0x0, len 72+0, prot 58, hops 255, originating*Nov 27 13:27:43.250: IPv6-Fwd: Sending on Ethernet0/0*Nov 27 13:27:43.255: IPv6-Fwd: Destination lookup for 2001:DB8::FFFF : Local, i/f=Ethernet0/0, nexthop=2001:DB8::FFFF*Nov 27 13:27:43.255: IPV6: source 2001:DB8::1 (Ethernet0/0)*Nov 27 13:27:43.255:       dest 2001:DB8::FFFF (Ethernet0/0)Spoke2#*Nov 27 13:27:43.255:       traffic class 224, flow 0x0, len 72+14, prot 58, hops 255, forward to ulp*Nov 27 13:27:43.255: ICMPv6: Received N-Advert, Src=2001:DB8::1, Dst=2001:DB8::FFFF*Nov 27 13:27:43.255: IPv6-Fwd: Sending on Ethernet0/0*Nov 27 13:27:43.255: IPv6-Fwd: Destination lookup for 2001:DB8::FFFF : Local, i/f=Ethernet0/0, nexthop=2001:DB8::FFFF*Nov 27 13:27:43.255: IPV6: source 2001:DB8::1 (Ethernet0/0)*Nov 27 13:27:43.255:       dest 2001:DB8::FFFF (Ethernet0/0)*Nov 27 13:27:43.255:       traffic class 0, flow 0x0, len 100+14, prot 58, hops 64, forward to ulp*Nov 27 13:27:43.255: ICMPv6: Received echo reply, Src=2001:DB8::1, Dst=2001:DB8::FFFF
    M.
    Message was edited by: Marcin Latosiewicz, edited for clarity.

  • STM1 Back-to-Back Between ASR 9006 and ASR 903

    Dear Gents,
    Seeking your usual support to aid me to connect STM1 Back-to-Back between ASR 9006 and ASR 903.
    I have ASR 9006 comes with SPA-4XOC3-POS-V2 and SFP-OC3-MM using XR-A9K-PXK9-04.03 IOS-XR.
    Also I have ASR 903 comes with A900-IMA4OS interface module with ONS-SI-155-SR-MM SFP using SASR903R1NPEK9-38S IOS-XE.
    I'm using Multi Mode fiber cable between them and the interfaces never came UP UP.
    Below the configuration i did to both sides.
    ASR 903 configuration:
    ASR903#sh run | sec contro
    controller SONET 0/0/0
     framing sdh
     clock source internal
     aug mapping au-4
     au-4 1 pos
    interfaces POS0/0/0.1  
    ip address 10.10.10.2 255.255.255.252
    ASR 9006 configuration
    ASR9006#sh running-config controller soNET 0/1/0/0  
    controller SONET0/1/0/0
     framing sdh
     clock source internal
    interface POS0/1/0/0
     ipv4 address 10.10.10.1 255.255.255.252
    Thanks in advance.

    I think your 900 is running in an oc12/stm4 mode (as you seem to subrate the sonet controller), so they have a speed mismatch already although it looks like you're using the right STM1 optic.
    also one side you will want to have use clock from line while the other internal, otherwise you'll get a lot of clock slips.
    cheers
    xander

  • How to share the same session between JNLP Application and browser session

    How to share the same session between JNLP Application and browser session using BasicService.showDocument(url) method? It appears whenever i launch any URL from within a JNLP application using BasicService.showDocument(url) , it creates new instance of browser and session even after i used cooke handlers to restore JSESSIONID and Ltpa token etc.
    public static int showDocument(String urlToOpen)
    BasicService obj = (BasicService) ServiceManager.lookup("javax.jnlp.BasicService");
    obj.showDocument(urlToOpen);
    }

    Try using Reflection

  • Porting logic sessions between studios

    Hi,
    I work with Logic Pro 7 at my home studio along with the studio at my workplace. I'm trying to figure out how to take session files back and forth between the two without having issues of missing audio instrument files, etc.
    btw, both studios have the same software plug-ins (Kontakt 3, Vokator, Spectrasonics Atmosphere, etc.).
    One issue I have is that when I "consolidate" a Logic project into one folder, it doesn't save 3rd party plugin settings in the folder (it only saves Logic-related plugs like EXS24).
    Does anyone work in this type of situation?
    Do you have any suggestions to make porting Logic sessions between two locations easier?
    -Michael

    I believe the "Save as project" function is the best thing for that situation. Like you said, it won't automatically save 3rd party plugin settings, but you can always save a 3rd party plugin (in the plugin window), and then copy the file from (from user/library/app support/logic/plugin settings) into your project folder. It would be nice if "Save as Project" included that, but it's still pretty useful for consolidating elements of your project.

  • How to share Sessions between 2 Weblogic ?

    Hello,
    I've some problems in setting on Weblogic. Suppose there are 2
    Weblogic Servers, WebA and WebB. A New Session will be created if user
    go to the page in WebB from WebA. Is there any methods to share the
    Session between them ? I turned on the following properties in
    Weblogic.properties already.
    weblogic.httpd.session.persistence=true
    weblogic.httpd.session.persistentStoreType=jdbc
    weblogic.httpd.session.persistentStorePool=demoPool
    weblogic.httpd.session.persistentStoreShared=true
    But a new entry will be created as long as user go to the page at WebB
    from WebA.
    In fact, I want to use the Session entry created by WebA.
    Thx
    Lim

    You need to make sure that session tracking is enabled,
    either via cookies or url rewriting. Otherwise, the incoming
    request won't be able to tell the server which session it belongs to.
    Jason
    "Cheung" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]..
    Hello,
    I've some problems in setting on Weblogic. Suppose there are 2
    Weblogic Servers, WebA and WebB. A New Session will be created if user
    go to the page in WebB from WebA. Is there any methods to share the
    Session between them ? I turned on the following properties in
    Weblogic.properties already.
    weblogic.httpd.session.persistence=true
    weblogic.httpd.session.persistentStoreType=jdbc
    weblogic.httpd.session.persistentStorePool=demoPool
    weblogic.httpd.session.persistentStoreShared=true
    But a new entry will be created as long as user go to the page at WebB
    from WebA.
    In fact, I want to use the Session entry created by WebA.
    Thx
    Lim

  • Keep alive a session between 2 BAPI calls

    Hi -
    I am calling several BAPIs to maintain data. I am calling from an outside system as I published the BAPIs as Web Services.
    I would like that the session between 2 BAPI calls is kept, so I don't miss some session info between call #1 and call #2.
    Anyone knows a way of keeping alive a session between 2 BAPI calls?
    Thanks !

    Try this..
    <b>ARFC with Resource Management (Parallel Remote Function Call)</b>
    CALL FUNCTION 'MYFUNC'
    STARTING NEW TASK 'T1'
    DESTINATION IN GROUP 'PRFC'
    EXPORTING ...
    TABLES ...
    EXCEPTIONS ...
    communication_failure = 100
    system_failure = 101
    resource_failure = 200.
    IF sy-subrc= 102.
    wait and retry...
    ENDIF.
    <b>Define ‘PRFC’via RZ12</b>
    Amandeep

  • Session between multiple Webservice calls from PI7.0

    Hello XI SDNers,
    I am unable to overcome my Webservice session problem using SOAP (Axis) adapter. My scenario is as follows:
    I am calling a external Webservice deployed in Axis webservice engine from PI7.0, during my first call:  I call synchronous "Login" webservice and I became the response "User is Logged in"
    during my second synchronous call "GetItem", the webservice returns "The user doesn't have valid session". The two synchronous calls are executed from same scenario one after another!
    I lost my session after the "Login". Is there any way in PI 7.0 to maintain the session?
    Note: I tried the same scenario using XML SPY SOAP client, it is working!!!  it is maintaining the session between multiple webservice calls.
    Is there any suggestions to overcome this problem?
    Thanks and regards,
    Satish.

    Hi Satish,
       We are working on the same sort of scenarios, where we have to call more than one webservice in a sequential fashion using the same session id details.
        What we did was we built new xsds adding session details node using the webserive request and response xsds. And we are maintaining a sessions table which contains session id and  status fields in PI. So we send webservice request with the session id details. We wrote an UDF to get the session details from PI and set the status field as busy so that no other request uses the same session details.
       Webserive response again contains the sessions details which can be used for the next webservice request.
      Finally after all the calls set back the status to Active in PI table.
    Webservice Calls From a User Defined Function
    /people/bhavesh.kantilal/blog/2006/11/20/webservice-calls-from-a-user-defined-function
    Hope this helps.
    Thanks,
    Vijaya.

  • Inbound IPV6 BGP Filterlists for ISP

    Hi people,
    I work for an company that is a tier2 ISP, we get full table transit from two tier 1 providers, we have recently gone with dual stack IPV4/6 and have the IPV6 BGP connection up from the teir1's but have no idea what to use for inbound prefix list filters.
    Can anyone give me a current upto date IPv6 prefix list we can use to filter out potential troublesome traffic from upstream?
    Many thanks.

    Hi Matthew,
    You might want to start with the Team CYMRU website. There are some excellent reference on that site about ipv4 and ipv6 filtering. They have been maintaning the ipv4 bogon list for many years and are considered a reference in the ISP community.
    http://www.team-cymru.org/ReadingRoom/Templates/IPv6Routers/
    Regards

  • Sharing sessions between web applications (WAR files)

    I am using weblogic 6.1. The opinion I have read indicates that
              sessions cannot be shared between WAR files. That is, I cannot put an
              attribute on the session from a servlet/JSP in one WAR file and read
              it out from the other. The only justification I've seen is "security".
              Now, I find this rather difficult to accept for several reasons:
              1. I cannot fathom what kind of "security" would prevent me from
              sharing the session between two web applications that I wrote myself.
              Let's say I want to write a system that I divide up, for
              modularity/separate deployment purposes, into 5 different WAR files.
              Why should I not be able to just sign on once and pass that logon
              information in the session from one to the other? (I know, I can use
              cookies or URL rewriting - but that doesn't seem to be to be a good
              solution. And if you can share information through cookies, why not
              through sessions?) What about other user information like currently
              selected language?
              2. Several app servers (iPlanet and I have heard two others) allow you
              to share sessions between WARs. Why not weblogic?
              Thanks for any information you can give me. I have not been able to
              find anything in weblogic documentation about this. If I am
              misunderstanding the server capabilities, please enlighten me.
              Thanks,
              <>< gary
              

    http://www.weblogic.com/docs51/classdocs/webappguide.html
              --kumar allamraju
              Grant Lewis wrote:
              > I'm currently evaluating weblogic and I can't find any references in
              > their documentation set stating they support web applications or war
              > files. They explicitly state in their docs the Servlet 2.2 specification
              > has been supported since version 4.5. I'm evaluating version 5.1. Can
              > anybody clear up the confusion for me.
              >
              > Grant
              

Maybe you are looking for

  • My weather app doesn't show the feels like temp or wind, etc.  How can I fix this?  I am running iOS 8.1.2

    My weather app doesn't show the feels like temp or wind, etc.  How can I fix this?  I am running iOS 8.1.2.

  • MacBook Pro and external microphone

    We bought a MacBook Pro 15" Retina a couple of weeks ago. We wanted to use it the same way as our current PC laptop: hook up an external camera via BlackMagic Shuttle Express Thunderbolt (through the Thunderbolt port), hook up an external Sennheiser

  • External monitor recommendations please!

    I'm switching from my troublesome iMac to the Macbook Pro - I've had so much trouble with my iMac display that I'm not sure about buying the Apple Cinema Display. I was wondering if there are any graphic designers out there that could recommend a goo

  • .MSP files accumulating. Needed?

    Hi, On My Windows drive I was trying to determine why my disk space is rapidly dropping, when I haven't been installing any new applications. I found that in my Acrobat folder in the ProgramData folder are three folders 9.0, 9.2 and 9.4. In the 9.2 f

  • Automate the process

    Hello Experts,           iam having a requirement where iam getting csv files from another system at present iam manually pushing the data into bw but now i need to automate this process.please give me solution for this