IR Value exceed GR value

Hi xpert,
how to block IV from processing IR if the item value exceed GR item value.

Hi,
SPRO --> MM --> logistic invoice verification --> invoice Block --> Set tolerance limit
Now u can set tolerance for a compnay code
BR     Percentage OPUn variance (IR before GR)
BW     Percentage OPUn variance (GR before IR)
DQ     Exceed amount: quantity variance
DW     Quantity variance when GR qty = zero
here in BR and BD, you can define upper limit or lower limit.
Regards,
Pardeep malik

Similar Messages

Free Goods to be issues if Sales value exceed target Value

HI,
User wanted us to configure the sales order such that when the total sales order vlaue exceed a certain amount, the system will automatic include a certain free items to the order as FOC item.
How do I go about configuring it?
Thanks

Hi Colin,
1: With standard SAP your requirement will not be fulfilled.
2: To do this you need some ABAP development.
Ask your ABAPER to write a code in user exit MV45AFZZ
where check the Value of the Sales order. If the Sales order value exceeds a specific value then add the FOC items in the Sales order where the item category should be TANN (or equivalent).
You might need a custom Z-table where you can store what Materials are to be added as FOC items in sales order & at what value.
regards
Edited by: Innovation is key on Mar 4, 2011 9:22 AM

How to get message Target value exceeded for value contract in consignment

Hi Gurus,
I have created a value contract in consignment process.
When the TOTAL VALUE of the release orders exceed the TARGET value of the value contract, system is NOT alerting me with message "Target Value Exceedded".
In normal value contracts, system throws error message while creating release order if target value is exceeded.
How such message can be generated in case of consignment process?
Is there is any configuration involved for item category 'K' for this requirement?
Thanks in advance,
Regards,
Sastry

Hi,
Thanks for the reply.
Those messages are already configured and they are working fine for my normal contracts.
I need such messages for value contracts in consignment process (item category 'K').
As there is no net price in consignment PO, such messages are not generated even though required messages are already configured.
Is there any other thing I need to do for CONSIGNMENT process
Regards,
Sastry

Milestone Billing, Billing date value exceeds Net Value

Hi all,
I have a issue related to Milestone Billing. Here billing dates are entered manually. Say for eg for Rs.1000, 4 billing dates will be entered for 25% based on completion of a project.
Now the problem here is , The net value will be 1000 [contract amount] but system is allowing to enter more than Rs.1000 in milestone billing dates. means i can enter more than 100%. how to restrict this. Do we need to use any user exit.? I have tried all standard ways.
Thanks & Regards
Praveen

Dear Praveen,
You can put a logic to compare the Total Value and also the individual milestone amount and trigger a error message while saving the sales order.
This seems the only way.
However lets wait for the experts to comment on this requirement.
Thanks & Regards,
Hegal K Charles

Contract value exceeding in Release order

Hi All,
The target value of the value contract is 200,000 INR. After reaching to the 190,000 INR ( Making different Release order ) the user has made one more purchase order for this value contract with the value 50,000. The system hasnt given any warning /error message that the contract value exceeding...
In general system should have to give the error message that the contract value is exceeding???
The message 06-042 & 06-155 set as error message.
also if your trying to make release order of more than 200,000 INR then it is giving error message 06-42 the value is exceeding
Please suggest
Thanks & Regards
Rajesh

Please check your release order qty set in contract item / header details

ORA-22813: operand value exceeds system limits

hi all,
ORA-22813: operand value exceeds system limits
the above error occurs while calling a function. in 10g its working fine. after moving it to 11g v r facing the error. Plz help

KRIS wrote:
Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.1.0.7.0 - 64bit Production
PL/SQL Release 11.1.0.7.0 - Production
CORE 11.1.0.7.0 Production
TNS for Linux: Version 11.1.0.7.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 11.1.0.7.0 - ProductionIt seems that is a bug,refer
*Bug 8861467 - ORA-22813 / ORA-600 [12761] can occur in 11g [ID 8861467.8]*
To fixing problem you need apply 11.2.0.2 (Server Patch Set)

PO Value Exceeded

Dear Friends,
I've generated a PO for Rs. 100.
I have to pay advance to Vendor Rs. 50. While creating a Down Payment Request (f-47) for Rs. 50, I'm getting a Error Message as 'Purchase order Value Exceeded'.
Could any body please help me?
with regards,
Nikita Kale.

please check wht % you have maintained in Billing plan.
I think it might be Down payment less than 50%
or check the link
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/59/ac922bcb0411d2acbe0000e8a5bd28/frameset.htm
Edited by: WISH on Mar 11, 2008 10:30 AM

XML data value exceeds maximum length - ORA-30951

Hello,
I am receiving ORA-30951: Element or attribute at Xpath /dataroot/Respondent[1]/Response[3]/Value exceeds maximum length error during the XML load.
I have registered the schema and it works fine when the Value is less than 64k but fails if its greater. I tried changing the type of Value to type="xsd:base64Binary" xdb:maintainDOM="false" xdb:SQLName="LOB_DATA" xdb:SQLType="BLOB" but then I get ORA-00932: inconsistent datatypes error.
Can someone please let me know what I am doing wrong or is there a way I can load more than 64k length elements on 10g?
Thanks
Here is my schema.
var SCHEMAURL varchar2(256)
var XMLSCHEMA CLOB
set define off
begin
:SCHEMAURL := 'http://xmlns.example.com/Svy_Resp.xsd';
:XMLSCHEMA := '<?xml version="1.0"; encoding="utf-16"?>
<xsd:schema attributeFormDefault="unqualified" elementFormDefault="qualified" version="1.0"; xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:xdb="http://xmlns.oracle.com/xdb" xdb:storeVarrayAsTable="true">
<xsd:element name="dataroot" xdb:defaultTable="SVY_RESP_XML_SCHEMA" type="datarootType" />
<xsd:complexType name="datarootType" xdb:maintainDOM="false"
xdb:SQLType="Dataroot_T">
<xsd:sequence>
<xsd:element maxOccurs="unbounded" name="Respondent" type="RespondentType" />
</xsd:sequence>
<xsd:attribute name="generated" type="xsd:dateTime" />
</xsd:complexType>
<xsd:complexType name="RespondentType" xdb:maintainDOM="false" xdb:SQLType="Respondent_Type">
<xsd:sequence>
<xsd:element name="RespondentID" type="xsd:int" />
<xsd:element name="KsID" type="xsd:int" />
<xsd:element name="email" type="xsd:string" />
<xsd:element name="SyID" type="xsd:int" />
<xsd:element name="KSuID" type="xsd:int" />
<xsd:element name="Completed" type="xsd:int" />
<xsd:element name="SubmitDateTime" type="xsd:dateTime" />
<xsd:element maxOccurs="unbounded" name="Response" type="ResponseType" />
</xsd:sequence>
</xsd:complexType>
<xsd:complexType name="ResponseType" xdb:maintainDOM="false" xdb:SQLType="Response_Type">
<xsd:sequence>
<xsd:element name="ResponseID" type="xsd:int" />
<xsd:element name="RespondentID" type="xsd:int" />
<xsd:element name="CID" type="xsd:int" />
<xsd:element name="AID" type="xsd:int" />
<xsd:element name="Value" type="xsd:string"/>
<xsd:element name="QID" type="xsd:int" />
<xsd:element name="SID" type="xsd:int" />
</xsd:sequence>
</xsd:complexType>
</xsd:schema>';
end;
/

Thanks for the quick response. I am not able to modify the source file, but will it be possible to set the value to NULL if it exceeds the max length instead of failure?
Thanks

Operand value exceeds system limits in sdo_aggr_mbr

Hi-- i'm trying to get the MBR of a fairly large geometry (1429 vertices) and run into a strange problem:
when i:
select sdo_aggr_mbr(shape)
from FEEDER_LINES_SDO
where subname = 'OCEANO';
i get what i expect:
SDO_GEOMETRY(2003, 82212, NULL, SDO_ELEM_INFO_ARRAY(1,1003, 3),SDO_ORDINATE_ARRAY(712103.736,3876977.34, 733591.744, 3896557.18))
however when i try to get the subname in my query as well:
select subname ,sdo_aggr_mbr(shape)
from FEEDER_LINES_SDO
where subname = 'OCEANO'
group by subname;
i get
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-22813: operand value exceeds system limits
The query fails with "ORA-00937: not a single-group group function" when i leave out the group by clause
i can get around it with a kludge, but would like to know why the group by fails
the kludge:
select subname,min(t.x) minx, min(t.y) miny, max(t.x) maxx, max(t.y) maxy from
FEEDER_LINES_SDO c,
TABLE(SDO_UTIL.GETVERTICES(c.shape)) t
where subname = 'OCEANO'
group by subname;
SUBNAME MINX MINY MAXX MAXY
OCEANO     712103.736 3876977.34 733591.744 3896557.18
where minx(), miny() etc are variations on:
function minx (geom_in mdsys.sdo_geometry)
return number DETERMINISTIC IS
begin
return sdo_geom.sdo_min_mbr_ordinate(geom_in,1);
end;
the group by expression seems to work fine on geometries with less than 1200 vertices. Is there a system parameter i can change?
elvis{44}% oerr ora 22813
22813, 00000, "operand value exceeds system limits"
// *Cause: Object or Collection value was too large. The size of the value
// might have exceeded 30k in a SORT context, or the size might be
// too big for available memory.
// *Action: Choose another value and retry the operation.
i am running oracle 9.2.0.1 on solaris8
any insight on this will be greatly appreciated
cheers
--kassim

Hi Kassim,
At KMS I recently ran into the same ORA-22813, when running this cursor SQL
     CURSOR lcur_montage IS
     select m.mont_id, m.sys_PK, m.krtp_id, m.mont_geom, m.til_dato_id , m.forloeb
     from MTK_montage m
     where m.fra_dato_id = in_dato_id
     and m.krtp_id = 1
     order by m.mont_id;
Omitting the order by clause makes it work fine. If I alternatively omit the SDO_geometry m.mont_geom as a select item, the query also works.
Our problem seems to arise when trying to sort selected rows, which contain large objects such as SDO_geometry.
Yesterday we played around with SORT_AREA_SIZE, but to no avail. It turns out to be a known bug.
When I today search for ORA-22813 in MetaLink, the first list item is
1.
9.2.0.X Patch Sets - List of Bug Fixes by Problem Type
Type: Note
Doc ID: 217194.1
Score: 63%
Modified Date: 18-FEB-2003
Status: PUBLISHED
Platform: Generic issue
Product: Oracle Server - Enterprise Edition
which unfortunately will not open and reveal its content.
On the other hand trying MetaLink -> Bugs -> search for 'ORA-22813' gives amongst others Bug 2656107, which looks a lot like my problem.
For Oracle eyes: - when will this bug be fixed? Does it solve the problem at hand?
- regards
Jens Ole Jensen
Kort & MatrikelStyrelsen (WWW: http://www.kms.dk)
Danmark
version: (32 bit) Oracle9i Enterprise Edition Release 9.2.0.2.0 - Production on Sun/SunOS 5.8 (64 bit)

PO values should not exceed PR values

Hello
PR value should proposed while creation of PO wr to PR, whenever Info records
are not mainatained and PO values should not exceed the defined limit
Regards
sapman

Hi,
You cann't restrict the PO value based on PR value, because the PO value is taken from Info record, Previous PO or Manual entry.
But PR value is from Material master or Manual entry.
Moreover PO value also includes other conditions like discounts/freight/duties etc on the net value so there is no fixed value for PO net price.
But PR will be always a fixed price means either from Material master or Manual entry based on the cost of the material.
So SAP has provided only qty restiction from PR to PO ( Message no. 06076)
but not for the PR value to PO value.
rgds
Chidanand

Billing value should not exceed contract(value based contract) value

Hi,
We are using value based contract and in item category we set E in incompletion rule which stops me to create relaease order where its value exceeds the contract value.
But via release order we recognize revenue(service based revenue recognition) and we do billing directly through contract via milestone billing plan,
At present i can bill more then my contract value.Now i want to system should not allow me to bill mre then contract value.
I checked the option in VOV8 and VOV7 but all those are meant for release order not for bliing.
Thanks in advance.

Hi Satya
You can set the billing amount in milestone billing plan itself. based on that value billing will done.

Target value exceed in contract

when i try to creat the service entrysheet by adopting the service details from the contract . then i am getting this error:TARGET VALUE EXCEED"
COULD ANY ONE SOLVE THIS ERROR..kindly suggest the possible way to solve this error..
regards,
Manu

hi Manu,
This message appears when the value maintain at service entry sheet exceeds then that defined at the contract...
As per this i think you have maintain a Value contract.....
Firstly, PLs check the enter value limit in the contract....
Then check the entry sheet, whether you are entering the more value then that defined in the contract....
If yes, then pls correct here and check and save....
This shd resolve your problem....
Hope it helps....
Regards
Priyanka.P

Sum of values exceeds the allowed maximum value per service line

Hi Guys,
While creating PO wrt to contract : I get error msg : Sum of values exceeds the allowed maximum value per service line Message no. SE402. Can I change it to warning or should I bifurcate one line into two , as the value is very big. Totalling to 11 characters excluding decimal. Its like xxx,xxx,xxx.xx inr.
Regards,
SK

Hi,
For service line items, the maximum allowed limit is 999999999.99 (total 11 digits including 2 decimals) as per design. If you want more than that, you may split the service in to two line items.
The note: 1810281 - System does not issue error message SE 402 explains the logic.
Regards,
AKPT

SERVICE PO VALUE EXCEEDING IN SERVICE ENTRY SHEET

Hi all
How to restrict the Service Entry sheet value which is exceeding PO value (In Service PO Unlimited & Price change option are selected)
Here scenario is user will place order for say 1 set with value of 50 Lakh with only one service line item & will select the unlimited & price change option.
Now he will receive invoice in parts & will post accordingly with quantity 1 set each time & value as per each invoice. in this case value of invoice raises can be more than po Value so how to restrict the same.
OR How to map this type of scenario otherwise to avoid above
Kindly suggest
Thanks & regards,
Rajesh

Dear,
Please check with S.-Based IV check box selected in Invoice tab of Item details. This option useful for
Indicator for Service-Based Invoice Verification
Indicates that service-based invoice verification is defined for a purchase order item.
In service-based invoice verification, the quantities and values of services performed and ordered to date are available for checking purposes. As in the case of invoice verification for materials, you are able to change quantities and values within the permitted tolerances.
In addition, if service-based invoice verification is active, the acceptance posting is carried out at the level of the services in the entry sheet, and the quantities and values of the accepted and invoiced services are shown in the PO history.
And I suggest to enter Limitations for Servce to limit the :
Overall Limit
Maximum value that the total of all unplanned services (or the value of the material) covered by this document item may not exceed.
Limits can be used in service lines and the items of blanket purchase orders.
When services actually performed are entered in service entry sheets (or at the time of goods receipt in the case of materials), the system checks the entered values with regard to adherence to this maximum value. If the overall limit is exceeded, it issues an appropriate message.
If you have also fixed sub-limits within the overall limit for an item, each time services are entered or goods receipts are recorded the system checks whether the individual sub-limits and the overall limit have/has been adhered to.
By entering in Limits tab of item details.
Hope this will solve your issue.
Regards,
Syed Hussain.

"New" error during ApplyLogOnInfo(...): Invalid parameter value: exceeds...

Invalid parameter value: exceeds the Min or Max or conflicts with existing value or edit mask
error during ApplyLogOnInfo() to the tables contained within a report. Now, this is a "new" error because this was not being thrown when the application was compiled for .Net 1.1 using the Crystal Reports v9.1.5000.0 components. When the application was migrated to .Net 2.0, and set to reference the the 10.2.3600 set of managed components, this started appearing.
Also, this will only occur on certain .rpt files that are loaded, and can be thrown when also executing the VerifyDatabase() method. By certain .rpt files, I mean those that have been opened and saved with Crystal Reports 2008 (warning message when saving indicated that the report will not be able to be opened in Crystal Reports versions earilier the 9.0; should I not assume this is correct?).
' Load a report that had been created in v10, but opened and saved in v12
Dim sFileName As String = "C:\test\CR2008Report1.rpt"
crReportDocument.Load(sFileName, OpenReportMethod.OpenReportByDefault)
crReportDocument.VerifyDatabase() ' Throws the EngineExceptionErrorID.MissingParameterFieldCurrentValue exception:
' Invalid parameter value: exceeds the Min or Max or conflicts with existing value or edit mask
' Load a report that had been created in v10
Dim sFileName As String = "C:\test\CR10Report.rpt"
crReportDocument.Load(sFileName, OpenReportMethod.OpenReportByDefault)
crReportDocument.VerifyDatabase() ' No exceptions; whacky.

>
A G wrote:
> Our product will not get integrated with SharpDevelop as it does with VS though you can use the assembly in you application.
Right, I am aware of the IDE plugin functionality (BTW, I'm going to guess no, but is the functionality present in the "Express" editions?). When a viewer application is created in VS, you can convert/open it in #d and have all of the designer props/pages available. When manually adding the viewer in a new #d project, you can add it, but it doesn't show up visually in the forms designer window (boggle).
> So just make a simple report and try to view it. can you see it?
I will investigate this probably tomorrow...
> Also is your report have any parameter? Dynamic or static?
Yes, there are parameters embedded (?) in the .rpt. There are no parameters added at runtime; only the parameter values are set at runtime.
> Make sure you can see data in report in designer..

IR Value exceed GR value

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for