Is it mandatory to release segment?

Hi,
If I do not release a segment, do we get any error in IDoc or something like that?
Is it mandatory to release segment?

Hi,
    Yes, it is mandatory to release segment.
Thanks,
Asit Purbey.

Similar Messages

  • How to make Settl. rule mandatory before release ?

    Hi,
    I have project with settlement to AUC and to the superior wbs elements. I want to have the settlement rule to be made mandatory (before Release) for all those WBS elements, where it will be settled to superior WBS elements. How to make this mandatory ? Is it possible through validations or is there any BAdI available for this ? I had checked for user exits, i could not find any suitable one.
    thanks in advance.
    Vinodh

    Hi
    1.For making settlement rule manditory, check with function module "CJPN_SETTLEMENT_RULES" and put into validation in OPSI t.code..
    2. when settlement rule is created system status will be set to SETC. So while saving the project , you can check if the status is SETC or not and the throw the required error.
    You can use BAdi = Workorder_update interface AT_SAVE.
    For staus check you can use BAPI_STATUS_CHECK and pass Objnr of the WBS and check for SETC ( Sys Status = I0028).
    try this options
    Thanks
    S.Murali

  • Cann't release segment type via we31 in IDES 6.0

    Hi  experts:
          I cann't release segment type via we31 in IDES 6.0, when go to EDIT , there is no 
    ' SET RELEASE' there,  but when there is Edit----set release in our production system, Woudl you please give me a hint why it is like this?
    Edited by: Sony Ericsson SAP Team on Jul 27, 2008 11:13 AM

    First Cancel the Release and then Edit .
    Once you finish the Editing , save it and then Release it.

  • Settlement rule mandatory before release of Produciton order

    Dear PP Gurus,
           Will you please inform me the way to configure settlement rule mandatory field before releasing the production order with out material.
    Thanks in advance,
    HT

    Hi Hareesh
    Go to IMG - Controlling - Product cost controlling - cost object controlling - product cost by order - period end closing - settlement - create settlement rule.
    in this select the appropriate settlement rule that u assigned to ur production order type.
    In this, in the block "Valid Receivers" for order , select "2 settlement required".
    If this is done, when u create a production order, it will ask for the settlement rule to be defined.
    Hope this is helpful to u. If so please reward points.
    Chandra

  • Changing IDoc Segment release

    Hi ,
    After upgrade from 4.6C to ECC 5.oo the idoc segement E1BP2017_GM_HEAD_01 is of 620 version for basic idoc MBGMCR01 .
    I need to revert back to previous release for idoc type MBGMCR01, message type MBGMCR so that the existing program and application need not be changed.
    If anyone has done the config changes related to same please let us know.
    WE don't want to create a zidoc type with the previous release segment.
    thx,
    Pawan.

    Hi Pawan,
    GOTO WE31- And select the recent segment defination - GOTO EDIT BUTTON - Select - Cancel release. Then you can cancel the release and use the old version if you are allowed. I am not sure wether u can be allowed or not.
    Otherwise Create the New version with reference to Old version and release it. Release is must.
    Hope this information is helpful.Let me know if I can help you further.
    Regards,
    Siva

  • IDOC Status 26: EDI: Syntax error in IDoc (segment cannot be identified).

    Hi All,
    I have created IDOC extension for IDOC Basic type "PROACT01" and have followed all required necessary steps but getting IDOC
    Status 26. EDI: Syntax error in IDoc (segment cannot be identified). The exact error is:
    Please check Error Details and the details of the steps I followed for Setting up IDOC Extension:
    Error Detail :
    EDI: Syntax error in IDoc (segment cannot be identified)
    Message no. E0078
    Diagnosis
    The segment ZPROSEG does not occur at the current level of the basic type PROACT01 (extension PROACTEX).
    This error can have several reasons:
    The segment ZPROSEG is assigned to a group whose header segment does not occur.
    The segment ZPROSEG does not exist in the syntax description of the basic type PROACT01 (extension PROACTEX).
    The sequence of segments in the group in which the segment appears is incorrect.
    Previous errors ('mandatory' segment or group missing) may be due to this error.
    Procedure
    Please check the IDoc or the syntax description of the basic type PROACT01 (extension PROACTEX).
    Can you please look at this problem and suggest what is wrong with IDOC Extension/Custome Segment?
    Below is the Details of the Steps which I have followed:
    1. Tcode WE31 - Created new custom Segment ZPROSEG with 4 fields. Released segment.
    2. TCode WE30 - Created IDOC Extension PROACTEX for Basic Type PROACT01. Released IDOC extension.
         Here when I run syntax check warning appears "No predecessors exist".  I am not sure if its okay!!
    3. TCode WE82 - Added Extension PROACTEX in the Message Type PROACT with BASIC Type PROACT01.
    4. TCode WE20 - Added IDOC Extension PROACTEX in the predefined partner profile in WE20 transaction.
    5. Added the following code in the Customer Exit EXIT_SAPLWVMI_001 include ZXWVMIU01 .
    DATA segnam(27).
    READ TABLE dedidd WITH KEY segnam = 'ZPROSEG'.
    IF sy-subrc NE 0.
    LOOP AT dedidd WHERE segnam = 'E1EDP31'.
    CLEAR dedidd.
    dedidd-segnam = 'ZPROSEG'.
    zproseg-matnr = 'Mat1'.
    zproseg-lgort = '001'.
    zproseg-gernr = 'SNo1'.
    zproseg-labst = 2.
    dedidd-sdata = zproseg.
    APPEND dedidd.
    ENDLOOP.
    ENDIF.
    Finally ran  transaction WVM2 (Transfer of Stock & Sales Data) to generate IDOC, its creating IDOC but when checked IDOC in WE05 its getting Status Error "26".
    Looking forward for your reply.
    Many thanks in advance.

    Hello,
    Actually you are appending the Z segment instead of inserting into the correct position. So the segment is added at the last, so hierarchy of segments is collapsed.
    So get the index of the previous segment E1EDP31 and increase the index by 1 and INSERT the Z segment with that new index as below.
    LOOP AT dedidd WHERE segnam = 'E1EDP31'.
    lv_index = sy-tabix. " <<--
    ADD 1 TO lv_index. " <<--
    CLEAR dedidd.
    dedidd-segnam = 'ZPROSEG'.
    zproseg-matnr = 'Mat1'.
    zproseg-lgort = '001'.
    zproseg-gernr = 'SNo1'.
    zproseg-labst = 2.
    dedidd-sdata = zproseg.
    *APPEND dedidd.
    INSERT dedidd INDEX lv_index. " <<---
    ENDLOOP.
    Here actually we are insering the record inside the LOOP and it regenerates the index again. It is not actually a good practice.
    So the best practice is get the index and generate the segment inside the loop, store them into another internal table, come out the loop and insert the Z segments into DEDIDD by looping the new internal table.

  • How can I make settlement rule mandatory in create work order (IW31)

    How can I make settlement rule mandatory in create workorder and saving without release.
    I kanow we can make settlement rule mandatory upon Release order but here requirement is
    Create work order (IW21) save without releasing that time settlement rule should default.

    Hi,
    1.If you want the settlement rule default then maintain account assignment data in technical object and when MO is created on that it would be copied into the settlement rule...
    2. If you want to make those fields mandatory .... plz check up field selections in config , if you cannot find those then use SHD0 Transaction variant to make those fields mandatory.
    3. Enter SHD0 , Enter IW31 in transaction and ZIW31 for transaction variant ..click create option and this takes you to IW31 initial screen , here enter required values of technical object etc and press enter and this gives you IW31 Initial scree screen variant , click continue and this takes you to inside screen and here enter required field values and on pressing enter gives you screen variant .. so you need to enter field values and check the flow of screen variants and on getting settlement rule screen variant select required option for the fields you need.
    4. Finally you can save that in package created in SE80 for transporting to other client .., you can activate the variant in SHD0 -->Standard variants -->you can find activate option ..
    regrds
    pushpa

  • Settlement Rule mandatory in Process order

    hai,
    How can I make the Settlement Rule mandatory while releasing a Process Order?
    Sonali

    In OKO7, select process order and in details, make the option for "ORDER- settlement required"...
    karthick

  • Segment IEA(Interchange Control Trailer)  EDI error

    Hi
    WHile valiidating the EDI 875 using SpecBuilder I am getting following error
    Segment IEA(Interchange Control Trailer) at guideline position (N/A) is missing. This segment's standard option is Mandatory.
    This segment was expected after:
    Segment Count: 22
    Character: 730
    My EDI file is as follows
    ISA*00* *00* *12*8283234100 *08*9267710000 *081103*1315*U*00401*000271883*0*P*>
    GS*OG*8283234100*3014302200*20081103*1315*271883*T*004010
    ST*875*171889
    G50*N*20081103*236772
    G61*BD*GINASHARPE/KIMSCEARCE*TE*8287254301
    G62*02*20081106
    NTE*ALL*IMPORTANTPOSHIPPINGINFORMATIONatWWW.MERCHANTSDISTRIBUTORS.COMVENDORINFO
    G66*PP*M*2
    N1*BT*MERCHANTSDISTRIBUTORSINC.*9*0069968880200
    N3*P.O.BOX2148
    N4*HICKORY*NC*28603
    N1*ST*MERCHANTSDISTRIBUTORSINC.*9*0069968880400
    N3*5005ALEXLEEBOULEVARD
    N4*HICKORY*NC*28601
    N1*VN*DPIMIDATLA*92*71541
    G68*1*CA*123.22*004132400013*PI*090669
    G69*SHP-DOWNEYSHNYBTRASSRT
    G70*60*7.5*OZ
    G72*88*02***4.8
    G76*3866*CA*42093*LB*2019*CF**7742742
    SE*19*171889
    GE*1*271883
    IEA*1*000271883
    I am putting all the headers and information still getting the error
    Any pointers will be highly appreciated
    Regards
    Sahil

    Hi Sahil,
    CR/LF is missing after IEA segment or simply press enter after IEA segment and EDIFECS will validate it fine.
    ISA*00* *00* *12*8283234100 *08*9267710000 *081103*1315*U*00401*000271883*0*P*>~
    GS*OG*8283234100*3014302200*20081103*1315*271883*T*004010~
    ST*875*171889~
    G50*N*20081103*236772~
    G61*BD*GINASHARPE/KIMSCEARCE*TE*8287254301~
    G62*02*20081106~
    NTE*ALL*IMPORTANTPOSHIPPINGINFORMATIONatWWW.MERCHANTSDISTRIBUTORS.COMVENDORINFO~
    G66*PP*M*2~
    N1*BT*MERCHANTSDISTRIBUTORSINC.*9*0069968880200~
    N3*P.O.BOX2148~
    N4*HICKORY*NC*28603~
    N1*ST*MERCHANTSDISTRIBUTORSINC.*9*0069968880400~
    N3*5005ALEXLEEBOULEVARD~
    N4*HICKORY*NC*28601~
    N1*VN*DPIMIDATLA*92*71541~
    G68*1*CA*123.22*004132400013*PI*090669~
    G69*SHP-DOWNEYSHNYBTRASSRT~
    G70*60*7.5*OZ~
    G72*88*02***4.8~
    G76*3866*CA*42093*LB*2019*CF**7742742~
    SE*19*171889~
    GE*1*271883~
    IEA*1*000271883~

  • Seeburger BIC mapping error(on changing mandatory fields)

    Hi Experts,
    I am working on IDOC to EDIFACT file scenario with seeburger.
    Earlier my end to end scenario was working fine. I got a requirement to change all the mandatory fields of segment NAD into non mandatory field. To acheive this i changed my Seeburger BIC mapping and target XSD in PI. After this process i create .sca file and ask basis to upload it.
    But after deployment i am getting error in communication channel where i am using BIC mapping. The error is message is quite big, still i am attaching a part of it. Please help
    Message processing failed. Cause: Error in BICMODULE-module:Temporary error: BIC XI Adapter call failed. Reason: 2 errors occured. First error: BICMapping: runMapping() FATAL ERROR: java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space (failed to allocate 16777240 bytes) Stacktrace: java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space (failed to allocate 16777240 bytes) at java.io.ByteArrayOutputStream.write(ByteArrayOutputStream.java:95) at java.io.BufferedOutputStream.write(BufferedOutputStream.java:105) at sun.nio.cs.StreamEncoder$CharsetSE.writeBytes(StreamEncoder.java:336) at sun.nio.cs.StreamEncoder$CharsetSE.implWrite(StreamEncoder.java:395) at sun.nio.cs.StreamEncoder.write(StreamEncoder.java:136) at java.io.OutputStreamWriter.write(OutputStreamWriter.java:191) at java.io.BufferedWriter.flushBuffer(BufferedWriter.java:111) at java.io.BufferedWriter.write(BufferedWriter.java:212) at java.io.Writer.write(Writer.java:126) at com.seeburger.jucon.dochandler.util.GrammarFileWriter.write(GrammarFileWriter.java:262) at com.seeburger.jucon.dochandler.EdiSegmentData.write(EdiSegmentData.java:234) at com.seeburger.jucon.dochandler.Segment.write(Segment.java:645) at com.seeburger.jucon.dochandler.EdiSegmentData.write(EdiSegmentData.java:390) at com.seeburger.jucon.dochandler.Segment.write(Segment.java:645) at com.seeburger.jucon.dochandler.EdiDocWriter.write(EdiDocWriter.java:367) at com.seeburger.jucon.dochandler.InhouseDocWriter.flush(InhouseDocWriter.java:884) at com.seeburger.jucon.mapping.Mapping.run(Mapping.java:2429) at com.seeburger.jucon.seebicapi.BICMapping.runMapping(BICMapping.java:1724) at com.seeburger.jucon.seebicapi.BICMapping.run(BICMapping.java:2518) at com.seeburger.jucon.seebicapi.BICMapping.startSyncMapping(BICMapping.java:1415) at com.seeburger.bicxiadapter.CCIInteraction.convert(CCIInteraction.java:1201) at com.seeburger.bicxiadapter.CCIInteraction.convertCalledFromModule(CCIInteraction.java:911) at com.seeburger.bicxiadapter.CCIInteraction.execute(CCIInteraction.java:313) at com.seeburger.xi.api.cci.impl.nw71.SeeXIInteractionProxy71.execute(SeeXIInteractionProxy71.java:86) at com.seeburger.bicxiadapter.module.CallBicXIRaBean.process(CallBicXIRaBean.java:384) at com.seeburger.xi.api.module.impl.nw71.SeeModuleAdapter71.process(SeeModuleAdapter71.java:78) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585) at com.sap.engine.services.ejb3.runtime.impl.RequestInvocationContext.proceedFinal
    java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) at com.sap.engine.core.thread.impl3.SingleThread.execute(SingleThread.java:169) at com.sap.engine.core.thread.impl3.SingleThread.run(SingleThread.java:266) DESCRIPTION: BICMapping: FATAL ERROR: Internal Fault. Class could not be load or instatiated. Check Installation, access rights. Last error: java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space (failed to allocate 16777240 bytes)
    Regards,
    Shradha

    Hi,
    Even I faced a Similar problem...
    1) make sure that the size of the data that is coming to BIC map is not larger than the size defined in the Source field (Check In BIC and SAP XI/PI map.
    2) Make sure id any other seeburger mapping are working fine , This is because you have to deploy the file in form of Active mapping.sca in SAP XI/PI after the changes are made on BIC side.
    3) Check the Adapter Engine Cache ...
    Hope this helps..
    Regards,
    Sainath Chutke

  • EDI segment number - correlate with the corresponding EDI segment

    Hi,
    In an EDI transaction we get an error log which says the mandatory data in segment 65, mandatory data in segment 815 is missing. Can anyone throw some light on how to get the correct EDI segment & field based on this piece of info?
    regards
    Prabhu

    Seems like the EDI tool that you are using can provide you only with general reference to the error position and cause.
    At one of my clients is using a software named EDI SIM where all the warnings and error
    regarding an EDI message can be seen and read.
    I suggest that if this is a common thing - you should get one as well or use
    SAP Conversion agent (ItemField),SeeBurger EDI adapter to get the exact error position and cause.

  • Finding Mendatory fields in a segment of an IDOC

    Hi All,
    Can anyone tell me how to find out the mendatory fields required in a segment of an IDOC if we are going to upload data using IDOC technology.
    Thanks in Advance.

    Hi Ginger,
    Can anyone tell me how to find out the mendatory fields required in a segment of an IDOC if we are going to upload data using IDOC technology.
    The fields in the IDOC can never be made mandatory but the Segments in the IDOC can be made mandatory.
    If segment is mandatory it means that atleast one field in the Segment should be filled.
    generally while defining the IDOC Header data is made as the mandatory segment with Minimum number  1 Maximum number  1 and rest all as optional and can occur more than once.
    Hope this clarifies!
    Regards
    Shital

  • Making "Partner" field mandatory during IW32

    Hi,
    Can u pls suggest me as to how to make the "Partner" field mandatory during the change of Maintenance order (ie IW32) for a particular order type. I tried Field selection for Order Header Data(PM) but the Field name "partner" is not appearing there. Kindly suggest me the way out.

    hi arun
    as far as i know it is not possible to make partner field mandatory after release.as i said you can make it mandatory during creation itself.
    iam not sure but another option you just try it out.create a status profile of 2 status assign one status as intial and hide the partner function and another status make partner function has mandatory.presently i am not in SAP so just try it out.
    regards
    thyagarajan

  • Auto Settlement rule creation problem at the time of PM order release

    In SPRO, for order type GEN, already customization available as "Madatory for Release" for order type. But still automatically settlement rule is not being created in IW31/IW32 at the time of release.
    If I go to Settlement rule in GO TO option-Settlement Rule in IW32, then system is asking me two options as as With default and Without default. With default settlement, settlemement rules are coming.
    But my query is, even if it is mandatory for release, why system is releasing without creating distribution rule in IW31?
    Pl. let me know if any config missing.
    Vijay

    Hi,
       Please read note 195607 and see if it helps
    regards
    Waman

  • Unreleashed segment issue with SAP schema

    Hi All,
    We are trying to generate SAP schema in BizTalk 2010 and facing unreleased segment issue and discussed with SAP team whom suggested below ways. We were interacted with MSFT and no hotfix yet. Please guide me.
    The provider/external should call IDOCTYPE_READ_COMPLETE in the following way:
    - PI_RELEASE = ' ' => last existing segment version is returned
    - PI_RELEASE not available in the interface => last released version
    Which means: BizTalk needs to ensure the PI_RELEASE is not present in the call of the interface. This will allow pulling the last release version of the IDoc including not released segments.
    Thanks, Raja MCTS BizTalk Server 2010, MCC If this answers your question please mark it accordingly

    BizTalk does not support unreleased segments for Receive Operations.
    As far as I know SAP 'locks' the segment types that have not been released and the LOB adapter of BizTalk cannot properly read those segments.
    The SAP team should set a release on the IDOC types and segments you need.
    Glenn Colpaert - MCTS BizTalk Server - Blog : http://blog.codit.eu

Maybe you are looking for

  • DOM Parsing problems... (newbie in trouble)

    I am trying to get a DOM Parser contruct a DOM Object from an XML file... I am having trouble getting the code validate against my XML Schema: <p> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> < <!-- edited with XML Spy v4.4 U (http://www.xmlspy.com) by Fed

  • Recommendation for Moving Screen Caps

    I'm looking for a program that will do screen capture movies. Snapz Pro seems like it will do what I want but I wanted to see if there was anything else somebody thought was AWESOME before I shell out my hard earned $$$.

  • RFC Implementation problems with SUP iOS

    Hi All, I have two RFCs, the first one is quite simple with two string inputs (defined as load parameters) and the output without any table. The Second one has several output tables and several inputs (String) including an Inputstructure. The first o

  • Miro crashes at startup

    When I try to start Miro after recent upgrade of my system yesterday it crashes at startup. miro.log 2013-06-10 20:23:07,237 INFO root: Starting up Miro 2013-06-10 20:23:07,237 INFO root: Version: 5.0.4 2013-06-10 20:23:07,238 INFO root: Revision: gi

  • Expose Orchestration as RESTful service in Biztalk Server 2013

    Hello all, I am having BizTalk application (orchestration)where I am receiving few info and sending it back some info to requestor. I want to expose this orchestration as RESTful service, to do that I know we can use BiztTalk WCF Publishing wizard an