Is it possible to enable & disable a field in a multi record block

When I enable a field in the multi record block all the records for that field are enabled or vice versa. I don't want that.
If I enable a field for one record the rest of them should stay as it is.
Thanks for any help.
Syed Jaleel.

You can set update_allowed,insert_allowed, Navigable false for
field in multirecord block using
Set-Item_Instance_Property;
Eg:
Set_Item_Instance_Property('BlkName.item_name',Record_number,Insert_Allowed,Property_False);

Similar Messages

Enabling and disabling the button in the multi record block

hi all,
i am using
Forms [32 Bit] Version 6.0.8.24.1 (Production)
Oracle Database 10g Release 10.2.0.1.0 - Production
i have a multi record block each block contains a button(button is to approve the record in terms of changing the status)
i have the items like date,remarks and button
the button should be enabled if the remarks is not null otherwise it should be disabled.
for this in pre-record trigger i have written
if :record is null then
   set_item_property('button',enabled,property_false);
else
      set_item_property('button',enabled,property_false);
end if;what problem is enable and disable is impacting on all the buttons in the block. in other words if first record's remarks is null then all the records button is disabled. if first record's remarks column is not null then all the records of the button column is enabled.
i have to make enable and disable the button for the corresponding record.that means if first record's remarks column is not null then only first records button should be enabled others should be disabled.
Thanks..

You need to set the No. of items displayed to 1 as Ammad had said, additionally you can set the X and Y Position (Just Y will do and having fixed X) of the button depending upon the current record.
can u explain this part alone bit more (setting the position of x and y)You need to calculate the variable Y_POS depending upon the current position of the cursor that is the current record.
You can find the current record Y_POS using combination of
V_CURRENT_RECORD := :SYSTEM.CURSOR_RECORD;
V_TOP_RECORD := GET_BLOCK_PROPERTY ('BLOCK_NAME', TOP_RECORD);
V_ITEM_Y_POS := GET_ITEM_PROPERTY ('ITEM_NAME', Y_POS);
-- Also needs to add the Y_POS of the relative other items in the muti-record block
V_HEIGHT := GET_ITEM_PROPERTY ('BUTTON_NAME', HEIGHT);
-- Note :- TOP_RECORD Returns the record number of the topmost visible record in the given block.
V_Y_POS := V_ITEM_Y_POS + ((V_CURRENT_RECORD - V_TOP_RECORD) * V_HEIGHT);
-- You will need to add Distance between Items in records if anyThen you can Set the current Y_POS of the button.
SET_ITEM_PROPERTY ('BUTTON_NAME', Y_POS, V_Y_POS);
[/code[
Hope this helps
Best Regards
Arif Khadas
Edited by: Arif Khadas on Feb 24, 2011 4:58 PM

Disabling a button in a multi record block

Hi everyone,
I have a multi record block with a button on each record, I have to be able to disable a button at runtime (following some conditions).
the SET_ITEM_INSTANCE_PROPERTY (item, record, enabled, property_false) does not work !
Any idea on how can I do it ?
Thanks for any help.

I don't think "enabled" is a valid property for SET_ITEM_INSTANCE_PROPERTY. You were probably thinking of SET_ITEM_PROPERTY but this won't work for you at the record level.
The only thing I can think of right off hand is to set the visual attribute using SET_ITEM_INSTANCE_PROPERTY to make each button look enabled or disabled. You could define 2 visual attributes, say something like VA_BUTTON_ENABLE and VA_BUTTON_DISABLE.
If you want the button to look enabled then:
SET_ITEM_INSTANCE_PROPERTY(item, record, visual_attribute, 'VA_BUTTON_ENABLED'');
If you want the button to look disabled then:
SET_ITEM_INSTANCE_PROPERTY(item, record, visual_attribute, 'VA_BUTTON_DISABLED');
Then, in your WHEN-BUTTON-PRESSED trigger, look at the visual attribute for that record using the GET_ITEM_INSTANCE_PROPERTY, and if the visual attribute is VA_BUTTON_ENABLED then execute your button code otherwise don't do anything.
Give it a try and see if that works for you.
Hope it helps.
Travis

Is it possible to enable / disable personal hotspot through MDM?

Is it possible to enable / disable personal hotspot through MDM?

If you are using the Smartbar you just enable or disable the relevant Menu Item using SET_MENU_ITEM_PROPERTY and that will automatically enable or disable the corresponding Button.
(you will need to use the Menu module menudefs.mmb which is a MMB version of the standard menu and smartbar and from that you can get the names of all the menu items.)
If it is a normal toolbar canvas with buttons on it you can use SET_ITEM_PROPERTY to enable and disable the buttons

Disabling radio buttons in multi record block

Need to be able to disable/enable one or more radio buttons in a group dynamically in multiple record block. Tried setting enabled properties but it sets for all records in the block. At the very least, I need to reset an item using radio to previous value if setting is invalid but when-radio-changed has already set value. Thank you.

Your one row record has 5 items, then I assume empno, ename, ssn, phone, deptno 5 items on your multi-record block.
you entered first row record as,
empno, ename, ssn, phone, deptno
100 John Smith 123-45-9999 234-333-9999 2
101 Al Brown 222-34-1111 123-456-7890 2(duplicated)
You want your code to duplicate the second deptno record as 2 instead of typing in, right?
If so, then you add KEY-NEXT-ITEM trigger on item :phone, inside put,
go_item('deptno');
duplicate_item;
It will copy the first deptno record 2 for the second record as showed above.

How to convert a puch button disabled in a multi record block?

Hi!
I have a multi-record block and I need to set some specific item to disabled.
I tried using set_item_instance_property with the following sentence:
set_item_instance_property('INAF_ESC.EEAS_TIPO' ,CURRENT_RECORD, ENABLED , PROPERTY_FALSE);
but it didn´t work.
Anyone have any idea?
Thanks
Vero

Hi,
ENABLED is not supported SET_ITEM_INSTANCE_PROPERTY built-in.
If you are env. has no mouse enabled, you can disable NAVIGABLE property using above builtin.
There is a way make the end-user to feel like it is disabled.
Create a visual attribute DISABLE_VA, with colors simillar to disabled buttion and set thie DISABLE_VA when the conditon is failed.
Inside the button-pressed trigger check whether the conditon is true or false. If the conditon is failed you simply do nothing.
~Gouri Sankar
But we can not stop the click action,

Check duplicate data entry in multi record block,which is a mandatory field

Dear all,
I have a situation where i have to check duplicate data entry(on a particular field,which is a mandatory field,i.e. it cannot be skipped by user without entering value) while data key-in in a Multi Record block.
As for reference I have used a logic,such as
1>In a When-Validate-Record trigger of that block I am assigning the value of that current item in Table type variable(collection type)
as this trigger fire every time as soon as i leave that record,so its assigning the value of that current time.And this process continues
then
2>In a When-Validate-Item trigger of that corresponding item(i.e. the trigger is at item level) has been written,where it compares the value of that current item and the value stored in Table type variable(collection type) of When-Validate-Record trigger.If the current item value is matched with any value stored in Table type variable I am showing a message of ('Duplicate Record') following by raise_form_trigger failure
This code is working fine for checking duplicate value of that multi record field
The problem is that,if user enter the value in that field,and then goes to next field,enter value to that field and then press 'Enter Query 'icon,the bolth Validate trigger fires.As result first when-validate record fires,which stores that value,and then when-validate-item fires,as a result it shows duplicate record message
Please give me a meaningful logic or code for solving this problem
Any other logic to solve this problem is also welcome

@Ammad Ahmed
first of all thanks .your logic worked,but still i have some little bit of problem,
now the requirement is a master detail form where both master and detail is multirecord ,where detail cannot have duplicate record,
such as..........
MASTER:--
A code
A1
A2
DETAIL:--
D code
d1
d2 <-valid as for master A1 , detail d1 ,d2 are not duplicate
d2 <--invalid as as for master A1 , detail d2 ,d2 are duplicate
validation rule: A Code –D Code combination is unique. The system will stop users from entering duplicate D Code for a A Code. Appropriate error message will be displayed.*
actually i am facing a typical problem,the same logic i have been applied in detail section ,its working fine when i am inserting new records.problem starts when i query,after query in ' a ' field say 2 records (i.e. which has been earlier saved) has been pasted,now if i insert a new record with the value exactly same with the already present value in the screen(i.e. value populated after query) its not showing duplicate.................could u tell me the reason?and help me out...............its urgent plzzzzzzzzz
Edited by: sushovan on Nov 22, 2010 4:34 AM
Edited by: sushovan on Nov 22, 2010 4:36 AM
Edited by: sushovan on Nov 22, 2010 8:58 AM

Is it possible to requery only a single row of a multi record block?

Hi,
I have a data block say "Employees". This is a multi record block.
Requirement: Two users are working on the same form (front end). Now the user1 has made change for EMP1 The same is not reflected in the User2 Session. Hence i need to requery the values updated for EMP1
Issue: Since there lots of employees listed in this block. i do not want all the employees details to be required (Block requery). Instead is it possible to requery only a perticular record to be required?
Thanks,
Vidya

I think not possible........
Usually Approach is the data in grid table displays as read only and when user press EDIT button then they can edit one single record in a separate window.
ooh got one idea.......
may be create a save point and rollback to that particular save point ....... i hv never tried it but try it might solves your problem
there is a feature of Clear_form rollback to save point
PROCEDURE CLEAR_FORM
(commit_mode    NUMBER,
   rollback_mode NUMBER);
Parameters
If the end user has made changes to records in the current form or any called form, and those records have not been posted or committed, Form Builder processes the records, following the directions indicated by the argument supplied for the following parameter:
commit_mode     ASK_COMMIT Form Builder prompts the end user to commit the changes during CLEAR_FORM processing.
DO_COMMIT Form Builder validates the changes, performs a commit, and flushes the current form without prompting the end user.
NO_COMMIT Form Builder validates the changes and flushes the current form without performing a commit or prompting the end user.
NO_VALIDATE Form Builder flushes the current form without validating the changes, committing the changes, or prompting the end user.
rollback_mode     TO_SAVEPOINT Form Builder rolls back all uncommitted changes (including posted changes) to the current form's savepoint.
FULL_ROLLBACK Form Builder rolls back all uncommitted changes (including posted changes) which were made during the current Runform session. You cannot specify a FULL_ROLLBACK from a form that is running in post-only mode. (Post-only mode can occur when your form issues a call to another form while unposted records exist in the calling form. To prevent losing the locks issued by the calling form, Form Builder prevents any commit processing in the called form.) Edited by: BaiG on Apr 12, 2010 3:49 PM

Enabling the current record only in a multi record block..how?

Hi,
I'am trying to enable a single record in a multi record block.
If i use SET_ITEM_PROPERTY it enables all records, SET_ITEM_INSTANCE PROPERTY does not have ENABLED Property.., so how to go about this?
I have a check box beside each record, if i check the check box only that record should get enabled..is there any way?
Regards
Mahesh

I found out the answer :
technical note 661 on on Siebel Supportweb (metalink3) :
"how to embed OBI requests in Siebel Business Application views, so that navigating among the records in the parent applet updates the child Analytics applet with context-appropriate content"

Enable / disable classification fields in material master?

Hi experts
We hope to assign one group who could change the matieral master fields on classification.
Like one gropu who could change the classification fields- date, on mateiral master . others only could display
Is that possible to modify the program to enable or disable one field ?
Now we have mm02 for normal user and zmm02 for specific user.
Thanks
ALice

Hi
When you create a role with transcation MM01, the Authorisation objects related to Classification are inherited from the transaction.
If you want to give the user only diplay options maintain the Activities as 03 for the authorisation object C_KLAH_BKL & give the Class Type Z01.
For the Chracteristics (Class maintenance)in the authorisation object C_TCLS_MNT maintain Activity 03 & Class type Z01
Similarly create another role & assign it to the user whco is authorised to create or chnage values, Give hm the activiies 01,02 & the class type Z01.
I feel that there is no requiremnt of changing the Program, as the authorisation objects are laready available.
Thanks & Regards
Kishore

Enabling / Disabling a field on a Form

Hi, I would like to enable a field for user input query value,
but once the data is returned to the form, I want to disable that
field so that it cannot be editable. (i.e. it is the PK for that
table). Anyone has any suggestions / Ideas.
Thanks
Srini

Hi,
If you can find the form element in Javascript using
document.forms[0].elements[i] - where i is the element number
then you can disable it by
document.forms[0].elements.disabled=true;
and enable it by
document.forms[0].elements[i].disabled=false;
the javascript would be something like:
if (document.forms[0].elements[i].value > "") {
document.forms[0].elements[i].disabled=true;
this will disable the field if it has a value.
you should put this in AFTER displaying the form since otherwise
the form is not there for the code to run on.
Regards Michael

Is it possible to enable/disable font antialiasing ONLY in LO?

I've got a question: Does the option marked in the picture with a red line work for you? I mean: Can you enable/disable LO font AA using this "tick" in Options/Libreoffice/View?
I'm asking because in my case it changes absolutely nothing and I have no idea whether it's my "fault" or a common problem (bug?) in LO. Can I somehow figure that out? If so, then how can i do it?
Last edited by Hwiparam (2014-11-07 13:34:34)

drcouzelis wrote:Even so, I'm sure there's a way to force fontconfig to use special settings for just LibreOffice. (Although I have no idea how that's done.)
Yesterday evening I did some googling, however with little result (actually no clear answer so far) If this option does not work for you as well, I think there is a problem with LO, not with my settings.
Maybe some day I will find a way to use fontconfig for that, as you described Or I'll report a bug to the developers. But now I have little time to waste and I've already wasted it too much on this "problem" Thanks.

Enable/disable lov button in a multi-row bloc

Hi all,
I have a form in which there is a multi-row block with some lov buttons related to some items,
in query mode, user should not be able to modify item, item property update_allowed is set to false, that worked, but user is able to modify item when he clicks on the lov button...so i want to disable the button for query records and for record in (insert or new), button should be enable,
i tried some tips but don't work, do you have any idea
Thanks for your help.

Hi,
Can you suggest some methods to enable/disable LOVs in my search query? I have a customized VC which performs search and I need to enable/disable the LOVs depending on requirement.
Abhishek

Is it possible to enable/disable requiredfieldvalidator in listview?

I have a listview that has a
RadDatePicker with a requiredfieldvalidator. If a certain field in my database
has a value (in the case it is a checkbox), I want to disable the requiredfieldvalidator when the page loads, but it is not working. Here is my sample code.
CheckBox cb = (CheckBox)e.Item.FindControl("chkNonPurchase");
if (cb != null)
RequiredFieldValidator rfv = (RequiredFieldValidator)e.Item.FindControl("rfvBirthDate");
if (cb.Checked == true)
rfv.Enabled = false;
Thank you in advance for your assistance.

You can enable or disable the RequiredFieldValidator with JavaScript on the client-side on Windows.Load or Document.Ready.
http://www.c-sharpcorner.com/Blogs/3363/enabledisable-requiredfieldvalidator-with-javascript.aspx
You may want to post to the Javascritpt section in tha ASP.NET forum for further assistance.
http://forums.asp.net/

Is it possible to enable/disable table row selection?

I have a situation where a user can add rows to a "selection" table with a value that is used to perform a query to get a collection of objects associated with that value. Once those objects are available, a second "results" table will be populated with the row(s) returned. When the value is entered in the selection table, a web service call is made to perform the query and return the results. This may take a few moments and I am displaying an indeterminate progress indicator for the selection table row involved to indicate that the data is not yet available - the progress indicator is included as a column in the row; each row has its own indicator. Once the results are received the indicator is hidden to indicate the query for that row has completed. The user may enter as many rows in the selection table as they wish so there is a distinct possibility of multiple queries being executed at a given time. I have also attached a row selection listener to the selection table such that when a given row is selected, the results table will display the corresponding associated row(s).
What I'd like to be able to do is somehow temporarily disable the selection of any row that has a query in progress, while leaving other rows whose queries have completed be selectable. Once the query completes, the row can then become selectable, thus allowing for the results to be loaded and displayed in the results table. The way it works right now, if the row is selected while the query is still in progress, nothing is displayed (obviously), but then the row has to be re-selected after the query has completed to see the results. This is a viable (though undesirable) solution/workaround if there is at least one other row in the table. However, if the row is the only row in the table and has been selected, it cannot be re-selected (there's no other row to select to allow for re-selection). To boil it down, what I'd like to do is prevent the selection of the row until the query for that row is complete.
After perusing the JavaFX 2.2 API, I'm not seeing any obvious way to achieve this effect. If anyone has any solutions, suggestions, etc. on how this could be done I'd appreciate it greatly.

Here's an [url https://github.com/james-d/Conditionally-selectable-table]example. As predicted, keyboard navigation fails if the keyboard presses would result in an unselectable item being selected using the default selection model. The best workaround I can see for this is to register event filters for the appropriate keyboard strokes, as in the previously referenced thread.
Update: That code won't run in the current (ea b90) release of JavaFX 8.0, and probably a few recent releases; it will however run in the final release (and it runs in JDK 7). See [url https://javafx-jira.kenai.com/browse/RT-30593]RT-30593
Edited by: James_D on May 22, 2013 7:51 PM

Is it possible to enable & disable a field in a multi record block

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for