Is there any time out defined for long running transaction?

hi,
i have to make one big data transferring script , though transaction is not required here, but i was planning to,
please tel me is there any time out for long running transactions.i have to run the script from database it self
yours sincerley

Can you show us an example of your script? You can divide the transaction into small chunks to reduce time and locking/blocking as well.
Best Regards,Uri Dimant SQL Server MVP,
http://sqlblog.com/blogs/uri_dimant/
MS SQL optimization: MS SQL Development and Optimization
MS SQL Consulting:
Large scale of database and data cleansing
Remote DBA Services:
Improves MS SQL Database Performance
SQL Server Integration Services:
Business Intelligence

Similar Messages

RZ20 - Is there an alert for long running transactions?

In RZ20 is there an alert for long running transactions?

http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/9c/f78b3ba19dfe47e10000000a11402f/content.htm
This document clearly explains your problem.
"Reward points if useful"

Is there any time out in a Data Federation connection?

Hi,
I have a multi source universe on SQL Server and BW, the query against SQL Server times out exactly after 10 mins, the time out setting in the universe connection and database have been bumped to 30 min but my query still times out after 10 mins, I looked into to connector configuration under DataFederation connection but there is no timeout setting for a sql server connection.
Any thoughts why my query is timing out?
Thanks
Ram

I got this issue fixed by changing the query time out setting to FALSE in the sql server sbo file. I am sill not sure where where can we change the time out limit from 10 mins to higher number.
location of the file: SAP BusinessObjects\SAP BusinessObjects Enterprise XI 4.0\dataAccess\connectionServer\oledb

Using MDBs for long running transactions

Although MDBs are not the best vehicles for running long transactions, I am
          forced to use them for one such scenario (let's say for lack of a better
          pattern). In order to let my long running MDB (with Container Managed Tx)
          do it's chores I increased the time-out value to a higher number rather than
          using the default of 30 secs. Strangely, I was seeing
          IllegalStateExceptions in stdout. So I created a brand new test MDB with a
          Thread.sleep for 60 seconds, increased my MDBs timeout value to 120 secs,
          made sure there was only one MDB in the pool and ran the test again. I
          still see the below error after 30 seconds.
          I guess I should probably open a support case, but I thought I'll post here
          as well in case there's something I am missing.
          <May 27, 2003 5:26:31 PM PDT> <Notice> <EJB> <Error marking transaction for
          rollback: java.lang.IllegalStateException: Cannot m
          ark the transaction for rollback. xid=64:bea55f200db2c786, status=Rolled
          back. [Reason=weblogic.transaction.internal.TimedOutEx
          ception: Transaction timed out after 34 seconds
          Xid=64:bea55f200db2c786(-33600248),Status=Active,numRepliesOwedMe=0,numRepli
          esOwedOthers=0,seconds since begin=34,seconds left=
          30,activeThread=Thread[ExecuteThread: '9' for queue: 'default',5,Thread
          Group for Queue: 'default'],ServerResourceInfo[JMS_hmJD
          BCStore]=(state=started,assigned=none),SCInfo[wlcsDomain+wlcsServer]=(state=
          active),OwnerTransactionManager=ServerTM[ServerCoor
          dinatorDescriptor=(CoordinatorURL=wlcsServer+155.14.3.140:7501+wlcsDomain+,
          Resources={})],CoordinatorURL=wlcsServer+155.14.3.1
          40:7501+wlcsDomain+)]
          java.lang.IllegalStateException: Cannot mark the transaction for rollback.
          xid=64:bea55f200db2c786, status=Rolled back. [Reason
          =weblogic.transaction.internal.TimedOutException: Transaction timed out
          after 34 seconds
          Xid=64:bea55f200db2c786(-33600248),Status=Active,numRepliesOwedMe=0,numRepli
          esOwedOthers=0,seconds since begin=34,seconds left=
          30,activeThread=Thread[ExecuteThread: '9' for queue: 'default',5,Thread
          Group for Queue: 'default'],ServerResourceInfo[JMS_hmJD
          BCStore]=(state=started,assigned=none),SCInfo[wlcsDomain+wlcsServer]=(state=
          active),OwnerTransactionManager=ServerTM[ServerCoor
          dinatorDescriptor=(CoordinatorURL=wlcsServer+155.14.3.140:7501+wlcsDomain+,
          Resources={})],CoordinatorURL=wlcsServer+155.14.3.1
          40:7501+wlcsDomain+)]
          at
          weblogic.transaction.internal.TransactionImpl.throwIllegalStateException(Tra
          nsactionImpl.java:1486)
          at
          weblogic.transaction.internal.TransactionImpl.setRollbackOnly(TransactionImp
          l.java:466)
          at
          weblogic.ejb20.manager.BaseEJBManager.handleSystemException(BaseEJBManager.j
          ava:255)
          at
          weblogic.ejb20.manager.BaseEJBManager.setupTxListener(BaseEJBManager.java:21
          5)
          at
          weblogic.ejb20.manager.StatelessManager.preInvoke(StatelessManager.java:153)
          at
          weblogic.ejb20.internal.BaseEJBObject.preInvoke(BaseEJBObject.java:117)
          at
          weblogic.ejb20.internal.StatelessEJBObject.preInvoke(StatelessEJBObject.java
          :63)
          at
          com.xoriant.hm.ejb.session.HierarchyManagerBean_fzysig_EOImpl.getHierarchyId
          (HierarchyManagerBean_fzysig_EOImpl.java
          :1477)
          at
          com.ebiz.application.customerprofile.hm.CPXHMController.SynchronizeMHTH(Unkn
          own Source)
          at
          com.ebiz.application.customerprofile.hm.CPHMOrgGroupMsgBean.onMessage(Unknow
          n Source)
          at weblogic.ejb20.internal.MDListener.execute(MDListener.java:254)
          at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:139)
          at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:120)


Hi Adarsh,
          It may be that the transaction time-out setting in the descriptor
          is not taking effect. The tx is still timing out after
          the default 30 seconds, so the later attempt to call
          "setRollbackOnly" fails as the transaction has already
          rolled back The ignored descriptor setting is a known issue
          in some earlier SPs, but I'm not sure when and where it
          was fixed - so yes, contact customer support. The work-around
          is to set the default transaction time-out for the entire server to a
          higher value. (I'm not sure where to set this on the console,
          but the relevant JTA MBean field is "TimeoutSeconds".)
          Tom
          Adarsh Dattani wrote:
          > Although MDBs are not the best vehicles for running long transactions, I am
          > forced to use them for one such scenario (let's say for lack of a better
          > pattern). In order to let my long running MDB (with Container Managed Tx)
          > do it's chores I increased the time-out value to a higher number rather than
          > using the default of 30 secs. Strangely, I was seeing
          > IllegalStateExceptions in stdout. So I created a brand new test MDB with a
          > Thread.sleep for 60 seconds, increased my MDBs timeout value to 120 secs,
          > made sure there was only one MDB in the pool and ran the test again. I
          > still see the below error after 30 seconds.
          > I guess I should probably open a support case, but I thought I'll post here
          > as well in case there's something I am missing.
          >
          > <May 27, 2003 5:26:31 PM PDT> <Notice> <EJB> <Error marking transaction for
          > rollback: java.lang.IllegalStateException: Cannot m
          >
          > ark the transaction for rollback. xid=64:bea55f200db2c786, status=Rolled
          > back. [Reason=weblogic.transaction.internal.TimedOutEx
          >
          > ception: Transaction timed out after 34 seconds
          >
          > Xid=64:bea55f200db2c786(-33600248),Status=Active,numRepliesOwedMe=0,numRepli
          > esOwedOthers=0,seconds since begin=34,seconds left=
          >
          > 30,activeThread=Thread[ExecuteThread: '9' for queue: 'default',5,Thread
          > Group for Queue: 'default'],ServerResourceInfo[JMS_hmJD
          >
          > BCStore]=(state=started,assigned=none),SCInfo[wlcsDomain+wlcsServer]=(state=
          > active),OwnerTransactionManager=ServerTM[ServerCoor
          >
          > dinatorDescriptor=(CoordinatorURL=wlcsServer+155.14.3.140:7501+wlcsDomain+,
          > Resources={})],CoordinatorURL=wlcsServer+155.14.3.1
          >
          > 40:7501+wlcsDomain+)]
          >
          > java.lang.IllegalStateException: Cannot mark the transaction for rollback.
          > xid=64:bea55f200db2c786, status=Rolled back. [Reason
          >
          > =weblogic.transaction.internal.TimedOutException: Transaction timed out
          > after 34 seconds
          >
          > Xid=64:bea55f200db2c786(-33600248),Status=Active,numRepliesOwedMe=0,numRepli
          > esOwedOthers=0,seconds since begin=34,seconds left=
          >
          > 30,activeThread=Thread[ExecuteThread: '9' for queue: 'default',5,Thread
          > Group for Queue: 'default'],ServerResourceInfo[JMS_hmJD
          >
          > BCStore]=(state=started,assigned=none),SCInfo[wlcsDomain+wlcsServer]=(state=
          > active),OwnerTransactionManager=ServerTM[ServerCoor
          >
          > dinatorDescriptor=(CoordinatorURL=wlcsServer+155.14.3.140:7501+wlcsDomain+,
          > Resources={})],CoordinatorURL=wlcsServer+155.14.3.1
          >
          > 40:7501+wlcsDomain+)]
          >
          > at
          > weblogic.transaction.internal.TransactionImpl.throwIllegalStateException(Tra
          > nsactionImpl.java:1486)
          >
          > at
          > weblogic.transaction.internal.TransactionImpl.setRollbackOnly(TransactionImp
          > l.java:466)
          >
          > at
          > weblogic.ejb20.manager.BaseEJBManager.handleSystemException(BaseEJBManager.j
          > ava:255)
          >
          > at
          > weblogic.ejb20.manager.BaseEJBManager.setupTxListener(BaseEJBManager.java:21
          > 5)
          >
          > at
          > weblogic.ejb20.manager.StatelessManager.preInvoke(StatelessManager.java:153)
          >
          > at
          > weblogic.ejb20.internal.BaseEJBObject.preInvoke(BaseEJBObject.java:117)
          >
          > at
          > weblogic.ejb20.internal.StatelessEJBObject.preInvoke(StatelessEJBObject.java
          > :63)
          >
          > at
          > com.xoriant.hm.ejb.session.HierarchyManagerBean_fzysig_EOImpl.getHierarchyId
          > (HierarchyManagerBean_fzysig_EOImpl.java
          >
          > :1477)
          >
          > at
          > com.ebiz.application.customerprofile.hm.CPXHMController.SynchronizeMHTH(Unkn
          > own Source)
          >
          > at
          > com.ebiz.application.customerprofile.hm.CPHMOrgGroupMsgBean.onMessage(Unknow
          > n Source)
          >
          > at weblogic.ejb20.internal.MDListener.execute(MDListener.java:254)
          >
          > at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:139)
          >
          > at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:120)
          >
          >
          >
          >

Are there any Panoramic Friendly Layouts for long photos in iPhoto?

With the frequency of digital cameras that take panoramic photos on the rise, I'd like to have a spread with two or three page wide long strips for panoramic. Or user configurable sized areas for images in iPhoto.

If you are talking about books you can place the photo as a full ppage image on both sides of the spine and manually movingthem to fit - you also can place a photo and right click on it and choose "fit to frame" to show the entire photo on the page or in the frame
LN

Considerations for long running publication extensions

We are considering implementing a post processing publication extension which may take several minutes to execute.   One of our concerns with this strategy is that the publication extension may bog down the Adaptive Processing Server.
Are there any general considerations / recommendations for long running post processing publication extensions?
Thanks!

Generally creating a new thread is an expensive process. Well, everything is relative. My laptop can create & run & stop 7,000+ threads per second, test program below, YMMV. If you are dealing with thousands of thread creations per second, pooling may be sensible; if not, premature optimization is the root of all evil, etc.
public class ThreadSpeed
    public static void main(String args[])
     throws Exception
        System.out.println("Ignore the first few timings.");
        System.out.println("They may include Hotspot compilation time.");
        System.out.println("I hope you are running me with \"java -server\"!");
     for (int n = 0; n < 5; n++)
         doit();
        System.out.println("Did you run me with \"java -server\"? You should!");
    public static void doit()
     throws Exception
        long start = System.currentTimeMillis();
        for (int n = 0; n < 10000; n++) {
         Thread thread = new Thread(new MyRunnable());
         thread.start();
         thread.join();
        long end = System.currentTimeMillis();
        System.out.println("thread time " + (end - start) + " ms");
    static class MyRunnable
     implements Runnable
     public void run()
}Edited by: sjasja on Jan 14, 2010 2:20 AM

Long-running transactions and the performance penalty

If I change the orch or scope Transaction Type to "Long Running" and do not create any other transaction scopes inside, I'm getting this warning:
warning X4018: Performance Warning: marking service '***' as a longrunning transaction is not necessary and incurs the performance penalty of an extra commit
I didn't find any description of such penalties.
So my questions to gurus:
Does it create some additional persistence point(s) / commit(s) in LR orchestration/scope?
Where are these persistence points happen, especially in LR orchestration?
Leonid Ganeline [BizTalk MVP] BizTalk Development Architecture

The wording may make it sound so but IMHO, if during the build of an orchestration we get carried away with scope shapes we end up with more persistence points which do affect the performance so one additional should not make soo much of a difference. It
may have been put because of end-user feed back where people may have opted for long running transactions without realizing about performance overheads and in subsequent performance optimization sessions with Microsoft put it on the product enhancement list
as "provide us with an indication if we're to incurr performance penalties". A lot of people design orchestration like they write code (not saying that is a bad thing) where they use the scope shape along the lines of a try catch block and what with
Microsoft marketing Long Running Transactions/Compensation blocks as USP's for BizTalk, people did get carried away into using them without understanding the implications.
Not saying that there is no additional persistence points added but just wondering if adding one is sufficient to warrant the warning. But if I nest enough scope shapes and mark them all as long-running, they may add up.
So when I looked at things other than persistence points, I tried to think on how one might implement the long running transaction (nested, incorporating atomic, etc), would you be able to leverage the .Net transaction object (something the pipeline
use and execute under) or would that model not handle the complexities of the Long Running Transaction which by very definiton span across days/months and keeping .Net Transaction objects active or serialization/de-serialization into operating context will
cause more issues.
Regards.

Problem handing long running transaction

Hi,
I have a long running transaction, and there is a high possibility that
someone else will make changes to one of the same objects in that
transaction. How is everyone handling this situation? Is it best to
catch the JDOException thrown and attempt the transaction one more time
or to return to the user on "failure"?
Also, would it possible with Kodo to set Pessimistic transactions for
just this case and use optimistic for "read" operations?
Kam

Also, would it possible with Kodo to set Pessimistic transactions for
just this case and use optimistic for "read" operations?You can easily switch between optimistic and pessimistic transactions:
pm.currentTransaction ().setOptimistic (val);
You can also use pessimistic transactions for everything, and set the
nontransactional read property to true to do reads outside of transactions.
Note, however, that you shouldn't use pessimistic locking for long-running
transactions in most cases. They use too many DB resources. It's better to
use optimistic transacactions and deal with the errors (or give them to the
user).

I upgraded to lion when it first came out but today i tried to open my photoshop cs2 and its telling me the powerpc applications are no longer supported is there any fix out there for this

i upgraded to lion when it first came out but today i tried to open my photoshop cs2 and its telling me the powerpc applications are no longer supported is there any fix out there for this

Lion is Not compatible with PPC (Power PC) based software, such as your older version of PhotoShop. Your choices are you can either upgrade to the newer version of PhotoShop, or you can backup your data and apps, erase your harddrive and reinstall Snow Leopard.
Hope this helps

I have a Lion content code for the free update. Is there a time limit on how long I have to download it

I received a web order number and content code for my free update of Lion. Is there a time limit on how long I have before I must actually download the application? Thanks. JVC

There is a time limit.
http://www.apple.com/macosx/uptodate/

Time out parameters for java servers

Dear Gurus,
I'm trying to identify if there are any time out parameters/attributes which can be set for the users at Java level.
I'm wondering if it's possible to limit a user from running a report/query for a long period of time.
Or a parameter to limit the number of sessions one user can have.
The reason I'm asking this is because my java server nodes have experience OutOfMemory errors every once in a while, and this is caused by high workload by the users. I'm trying to prevent or decrease the number of these OutOfMemory errors.
Appreciate any feedback on this.
Thanks.
Regards,
Keat

Hi Mark,
Currently, parameter DefaultExpirationTime = 3600, i think this is okay.
I've located other parameters which might be related to user/system timeout settings.
HttpMonitoringCacheTimeoutMillis = 1500
KeepAliveTimeout = 15
SessionTableTimeout = -1
InputStreamAddTimeout = 0
TransactionTimeout = 0
sap.defaultMaxNumberOfConnections = 10
I'm thinking about tweaking these parameters as well.
Any comments???
Regards,
Keat

Is there any BTE or Badi for Vendor Outgoing payment posting

Hi Experts,
My client who want the bank commission deduction at the time of vendor outgoing payment on the net values. the bank commission is fix of Rs. 0.07 Paise Per Rs. 1000/-
The scenario is as below:
Client who deduct the deduction at the time of Invoice for e.g. can bhade, Sanstha anamat , Prakriya Kharch ,Vahtuk Bhade, Share anamat etc. this deduction are directly update the Accounting GL .
after that the client pay the vendor dues amount. in this they deduct some deduction through Account (FI) (E.g. Sanstha Audit fee, Shikshan fund, machine anamat) & After deducting the Accounting deduction they calculate bank commission on the net amount (Invoice amount - FI deductions = Net amount)
Dear Expert, Please help me to work out this problem. in sap at the time of invoice we deduct the deduction as per client required & get the vendor due amount properly.
but at the time of vendor outgoing payment i had done the FI side deduction manually but i can't get the bank commission on the net dues amount. client required automatic bank commission deduction on the net amount.
is there any BTE or BADi for Vendor outgoing payment?
Please help me to workout this issue.
Warm regards,
Dhananjay Rahane.

ok

OFSAA CRM ERROR 16616 - Are there any list of errors for consult

Hi gys
OFSAA CRM ERROR 16616 - Are there any list of errors for consult about CRM ?
regards
Daniel Daniele

@chris_l -- yeah I was worried that might be the case, still I'm not sure if that explains why it keeps failing the burn process part way through?
I've tried this and that in Linux but without much luck. I'm still quite a noob with a lot of Linux things and this is the first time I'm trying anything to do with optical disks/drives etc. so I'm learning as I go...
The disk that failed in Windows but was 'readable' in Linux did just pass a run through ddrescue -- i.e. it created an output file okay and did not report any errors in the process.
However when I mounted the resulting image and tried to copy the files across the first folder reported an "input/ouput error" (just using gui copy+paste in Thunar file manager)
...the other folders did copy okay though!
It seems as though it's the lead-in / lead-out and disc finalizing process that are the main fail points with the burn operation. I don't know if InfraRecorder is any good or likely to be the problem? Anyway the drive cam with Nero (inc. Linux version) so might give either or both of these a go too, if they don't work either then at least I wont be short of something to rest a mug o' tea on
@ chris_l (again) -- the Plextor drives do have a "Vari-Rec" feature which allows a user to 'tweak' the laser power / output level so I might try this too.
@alphaniner -- thanks I've not seen this package before, I'm guessing it's a bit like cdparanoia but for dvds?!
Thanks for the help!
(pre-post) UPDATE >>> I've just mounted my Windows partition in Linux so I'll have a crack at burning the files using cdrtools before I resort to throwing the dvd drive out of the window and chasing it around the yard with a lump hammer

Is there any way to search for bad blocks in my Macintoshi HD without formating it? I'm experiencing too much I/O problems...

Is there any way to search for bad blocks in my Macintoshi HD without formating it? I'm experiencing too much I/O problems...

Check the drive health with the free demo of SMART Utility.
http://www.volitans-software.com/smart_utility.php
Reformatting and zeroing out might keep a drive going a bit longer, but once bad blocks become noticeable, it's not a drive you should trust any longer.

Is there any internet radio app. for Series 40 (65...

Is there any internet radio app. for Series 40 (6500 classic) ?

Keep an eye out here too.
http://betalabs.nokia.com/apps/nokia-internet-radio-s40
Currently Nokia Internet Radio is available as a beta for Nokia X2 and X3, but more devices will be supported over time.
John - Community Facilitator @ Nokia Beta Labs

Is there any time out defined for long running transaction?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for