Ise inline Posture

..

Understanding the Role of Inline Posture
An Inline Posture node is a gatekeeper that enforces access policies and handles change of authorization (CoA) requests. An Inline Posture node is positioned behind the network access devices on your network that are unable to accommodate CoA, such as wireless LAN controllers (WLC) and virtual private network (VPN) devices.
After the initial authentication of a client (using EAP/802.1x and RADIUS), the client must still go through posture assessment. The posture assessment process determines whether the client should be restricted, denied, or allowed full access to the network. When a client accesses the network through a WLC or VPN device, Inline Posture is responsible for the policy enforcement and CoA that these devices are unable to accommodate.
Inline Posture Policy Enforcement
Inline Posture uses RADIUS proxy and URL redirect capabilities in the control plane to manage data plane traffic for endpoints. As a RADIUS proxy, Inline Posture is able to tap into RADIUS sessions between network access devices (NADs) and RADIUS servers. NADs can open full gate to client traffic. However, Inline Posture opens only enough to allow limited traffic from clients. The restricted bandwidth allows clients the ability to have an agent provisioned, have posture assessed, and have remediation done. This restriction is accomplished by downloading and installing DACLs that are tailored for specific client flow.
Upon full compliance, a CoA is sent to the Inline Posture node by the Policy Service ISE node, and full gate is opened by the Inline Posture node for the compliant client endpoint. The RADIUS proxy downloads the full-access DACL, installs it, and associates the client IP address to it. The installed DACL can be common for a number of user groups, so that duplicate downloads are not necessary as long as the DACL content does not change at the Cisco ISE servers.
The Inline Posture policy enforcement flow illustrated in the figure above follows these steps:
1. The endpoint initiates a .1X connection to the wireless network.
2. The WLC, which is a NAD, sends a RADIUS Access-Request message to the RADIUS server (usually the Policy Service ISE node).
3. Inline Posture node, acting as a RADIUS proxy, relays the Access-Request message to the RADIUS server.
4. After authenticating the user, the RADIUS server sends a RADIUS Access-Accept message back to the Inline Posture node.
There can be a number of RADIUS transactions between the Endpoint, WLC, Inline Posture node, and the Cisco ISE RADIUS server before the Access-Accept message is sent. The process described in this example has been simplified for the sake of brevity.
5. The Inline Posture node passes the Access-Accept message to the WLC, which in turn authorizes the endpoint access, in accordance with the profile that accompanied the message.
6. The proxied Access-Accept message triggers Inline Posture to send an Authorization-Only request to the Policy Service ISE node, to retrieve the profile for the session.
7. The Policy Service ISE node returns an Access-Accept message, along with the necessary Inline Posture profile.
8. If the access control list (ACL) that is defined in the profile is not already available on the Inline Posture node, Inline Posture downloads it from the Policy Service ISE node using a RADIUS request (to the Cisco ISE RADIUS server).
9. The Cisco ISE RADIUS server sends the complete ACL in response. It is then installed in the Inline Posture data plane so that endpoint traffic passes through it.
There may be a number of transactions before the complete ACL is downloaded, especially if the ACL is too large for one transaction.
10. As the endpoint traffic arrives at the WLC, the WLC sends out a RADIUS Accounting-Start message for the session to the Inline Posture node.
The actual data traffic from the endpoint may arrive at the Inline Posture untrusted side before the Accounting-Start message is received by the Inline Posture node. Upon receiving the RADIUS Accounting-Start message, the Inline Posture node learns the IP address of the endpoint involved in the session and associates the endpoint with the ACL (downloaded and installed earlier in the session). The initial profile for this client endpoint could be restrictive, to posture the client before being given full access.
11. Assuming the restrictive ACL allows only access to Cisco ISE servers, the endpoint is only allowed actions such as agent downloading and posture assessment over the data plane.
12. If the client endpoint is posture compliant (as part of the restricted communication with Cisco ISE services earlier), the Policy Service ISE node initiates a RADIUS Change of Authorization (CoA) with the new profile. Hence, a new ACL is applied at the Inline Posture node for the session. The new ACL is installed immediately and applied to the endpoint traffic.
13. The endpoint is then capable of full access to the enterprise network, as a result of the new profile that was applied to Inline Posture.
A RADIUS stop message for a given session that is issued from the WLC, resets the corresponding endpoint access at the Inline Posture node.
Best regards,
Mantej Mangat

Similar Messages

  • Cisco ISE inline posture node Posture assessment query

    Hi all,
    i read the user guide for the ISE 1.1 and in the Inline posture section, I picked up the following text which concerned me if I understand it right...
    "In a deployment, such as outlined in the example, when more endpoints connect to the wireless network
    they are likely to fall into one of the identity groups that already have authenticated and authorized users
    connected to the network.
    For instance, there may be an employee, executive, and guest that have been granted access through the
    outlined steps. This situation means that the respective restrictive or full-access profiles for those ID
    groups have already been installed on the Inline Posture node. The subsequent endpoint authentication
    and authorization uses the existing installed profiles on the Inline Posture node, unless the original
    profiles have been modified at the Cisco ISE policy configuration. In the latter case, the modified profile
    with ACL is downloaded and installed on the Inline Posture node, replacing the previous version."
    Does this mean that if a corporate user VPNs in and successfully passes posture and gets a dACL applied to the session allowing full access, will the next user completely skip posture assessment and granted full access to the network if they are a member of the same AD group?
    I am planning on using the iPEP for posturing VPN clients and using AD groups to determine the correct dACL to apply to a particular VPN session.
    Thanks!
    Mario

    I'm not too familiar with the actual operations of the Inline Posture node, but it seems to me that the only things that are more or less "cached" are the authentication and authorization profiles that have been previously matched. So, even if they're "cached" and a endpoint matches and authorizes based on those policies, it would match on the policy that provides a pre-posture state. So, a PRE-POSTURE ACL would be pushed and an URL redirect would also occur to the NAC agent download portal (if the endpoint doesn't have it already).
    After posture is assessed, a change of authorization would occur and reauthorize that endpoint's session.
    So, in short, even if the profiles are cached, they only deliver pre-posture profiles. After posture assessment, the endpoint is goes through reauth via CoA.
    If you have access to the partner education connection, I suggest checking out the VoE deep dive series for ISE. There's a posture presentation that would probably help you out.
    https://communities.cisco.com/docs/DOC-30977
    HTH,
    Ryan

  • ISE inline posture limitation.

    Hi all,
    Can any one help me in configuration of ISE in inline posture mode. and What are the limitation of this mode.

    The following are known limitations for Inline Posture in Cisco ISE, Release 1.0.
    • Inline Posture is not supported in a virtual environment, such as VMware.
    • Backup and restore is not available for Inline Posture nodes in Cisco ISE, Release 1.0.
    • The Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) Agent is not supported by Inline Posture.
    • The Cisco Discovery Protocol (CDP) is not supported by Inline Posture.
    For more information over configuration and others you can see the attached PDF    

  • ISE Inline Posture and SGT

    ISE Experts,
    I'm doing research preparing for an SGT deployment.
    We have Cisco ASA for VPN and iPEP for Posture enforecement.
    The questions are:
    1) Does iPEP support SGT?
    2) Can I utilize SGT for VPN users?
    Thanks,
    Val

    The Cisco  TrustSec (CTS) architecture secures networks by establishing domains of  trusted network devices. Once a network device authenticates with the  network, the communication on the links between devices in the cloud is  secured with a combination of encryption, message integrity checks, and  replay protection mechanisms.
    CTS  use the user and device identification information acquired during the  authentication phase to classify packets as they enter the network. CTS  maintains classification of each packet or frame by tagging it with a  security group tag (SGT) on ingress to the network so that it can be  identified for applying security and other policy criteria along the  data path. The tags allow network intermediaries such as switches and  firewalls to enforce access control policy based on the classification.
    Please  check the below links which may be helpful for you in configurations:
    Link-1
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/ise/1.1/user_guide/ise_sga_pol.pdf

  • Cisco ISE - line posture node and switch connection.

    I am studying how Cisco ISE - Inline Posture Node working under the Bridge Mode. I learned that I need to configure the vlan mapping between the untrusted and trusted interfaces of IPN device ( http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/ise/1.1/user_guide/ise_ipep_deploy.html - Figure 10-6).
    Does that mean I can setup a 802.1Q trunk link between the switch port and trusted/untrusted interface on IPN? Is there any vlan mapping entry limitation? Thanks.

    Please review the below link which might also be  helpful:
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps11640/products_configuration_example09186a0080bea904.shtml

  • Inline Posture between Cisco ISE and Wireless LAN Controller

    Hi,
    I was looking into Cisco ISE solution for deploying NAC.
    I have a question about the network topology.
    In  the user guide documents of cisco ISE, it is written that for Wireless  LAN Controllers (WLC) and VPN devices, an additional server, Inline Posture, is needed.
    However, in the following integration document, there is not an inline posture between WLC and Cisco ISE server.
    https://supportforums.cisco.com/docs/DOC-18121
    I  want to know if Inline Posture is a requirement, if not a  requirement, what are the benefits of having it between Cisco ISE Server  and WLC.
    Thanks & Regards
    Sinan

    Hello,
    Please go through below mentioned links which might be helpful for you.
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/ise/1.2/user_guide/ise_ipep_deploy.html
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/ise/1.2/installation_guide/ise_deploy.html
    Best Regards,

  • ISE Inline Node

    I have an ISE Inline Node that I successfully added to my admin ISE node.  After I added the inline node, I wasn't able to configure it until later.  When I went back to edit the configuration, the admin node says it is not able to communicate with the inline node.  Below is the exact error:
    Could not establish secure connection with Inline Posture node. Please be sure that certificates are configured correctly for mutual authentication between this node and the Inline Posture node.
    The certificates haven't changed since I initially added the node.  Also I am not able to open an SSL session to the trusted IP of the inline node.  I am not sure if this is normal or not.

    Yes I caught this during the upgrade, so my nodes were already deregistered. Since I was planning on rebuilding my setup I went ahead and reset the configuration (or you can issue the pep switchoutof-pep command - http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/ise/1.1/cli_ref_guide/ise_cli_app_a.html#wp2150747) in order to rollback the configuration to standalone and make the certificate change.
    Just for you reference here is the link that will help you nail down the cert requirements (Step 3) -
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/ise/1.1.1/release_notes/ise111_rn.html#wp248769
    This should do the trick for you!
    Tarik Admani
    *Please rate helpful posts*

  • ISE | Inline VPN deployment Issue

    Hi,
    I have ASA which I use for internet access and VPN gateway. I am trying to deploy ISE inline VPN node, but i found that the users traffic (from inside to internet) denied by the Inline node (users return traffic from untrusted port to trusted is blocked).... It is only permitted if i add the real IP subnet , i need to access , in the filter tab.
    This is not practical because i can not exclude all internet addresses.
    My questions are:
    1) Is Inline VPN designed to be used only with dedicated VPN GWs?
    2)Is there any workaround for this?
    Thanks for any support.

    The ASA code you need is 9.2.1 or later.  This allows the ASA to perform CoA, thus negating the need for the Inline Posture Node.
    In which mode is the IPN working?  Bridged or Routed?
    Please Rate Helpful posts and mark this question as answered if, in fact, this does answer your question.  Otherwise, feel free to post follow-up questions.
    Charles Moreton

  • Inline Posture deployment for non Cisco Wireless Controler

    Hi all of you
    I have to deploy an Inline Posture to manage non Cisco Wireless Controler ( ZoneDirecteur 1000 Ruckus), It seem easy but I don't know from where to start. All documentation I rode it's about Inline Posture for VPN. I want just to use this Inline Posture to manage Wireless user through ZoneDirector wirelss controler. Thank you.
    Regards
    Kouassi

    So what is the solution for this scenario?
    remote site has non-cisco autonomous wireless AP. NAC is centralized. I can not use OOB since there is no support for non-cisco AP in OOB mode. As a result I use InBand mode. This means that local wireless trffic in remote site must travel to central site, go through NAC Server and go back to remote site. Is this correct?

  • ISE profile / posture IOS device

    is there a way to profile or posture an IOS device as to wheather or not it has been rooted?
    our Corporate policy would like to say that if rooted, you get zero access.
    Thanks
    Scott

    No - future MDM integration that Cisco is working on should be able to bring is type of information to ISE. Cisco have indicated MDM integration is coming in Q4 2012.
    Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPad App

  • ISE VPN Posturing NAC Failing to initialize

    My customer is experiencing intermittent VPN issues in which the NAC agent will not pop-up upon connecting to the VPN.  It works fine on the LAN however.  The problem is not experienced by everyone.  for example, it never happens to me, and has never happened to my contact at the client.  but i am told that he has VPN users that this happens often to.
    NAC can be initiated by either a reboot, or exiting the agent and allowing the redirect to relaunch the agent.
    In some cases, the agent is not detected on the machine, and the redirect instructs the VPN user to install the agent, even though it is installed already.  However, the case may also be that this same user was connected the day before.
    What i am thinking is that it may have something to do with the SWISS discovery or timers.
    DNS works fine.  I have increased the SWISS timers, and disabled L3 SWISS delay.  I have yet to know for sure if this will work, but i would like to get some insight from the community as to whether i am heading the right direction, or if others have a solutions.
    I know another method would be to just do WebAgent, but the problem that would then introduce is being double postured. If the WebAgent launches, and they have the client installed, they may both run at the same time.
    thoughts?
    Thanks in advance
    Mike

    Were you ever able to resolve this issue?  Having the same issue.  Work great on some machines, but takes forever (or never) runs without reinstall on some.
    Thanks!
    Pete

  • Client Authentication/Authorization via ISE & AD, Posture Registry Key, and mapped to specific DHCP scope by AD membership

    Hi Team,
    I'm currently working on a configuration entailing WLC and ISE where the customer wants a single SSID,and wants his wireless clients to authenticate successfully if they pass a registry key compliance.  Additionally, they want clients to received a different IP address or get mapped to a different DHCP scope based on the Microsoft AD group they belong too. for example:
    Client authenticating with registry key and in AD group ABC that passes authentication gets IP address or subnet for AD group ABC.
    Client authenticating with registry key and in AD group XXX that passes authentication gets IP address or subnet for AD group XXX.
    Clients---->WLC------>ISE-----> MS AD ( groups ABC, XXXX, YYY )
    currently using EAP-PEAP/MSCHAPv2
    Does anyone have any idea or pointers or can refer me somewhere that I can read on how to accomplish this?  Not sure on how to do the registry compliance check nor what attributes will allow me to map the client to a DHCP Scope based on this AD group membership? 
    Thanks...

    Do check cisco how to guides you will get step by step configuration of the current requirement
     

  • ISE/NAC posturing - WSUS not available?

    We ran into this scenario this weekend.
    We have 2 VPN sites(US and EMEA) both ASA 5515X...each site has a WSUS server (US is master, EMEA is downstream).
    VIA GPO, we have EMEA workstations set to get updates from the EMEA WSUS server. We have the VPN profiles set to rollover if one isn't available.
    (so if you try to connect to US, and it isn't responding it automatically tries the EMEA connection, and vice versa)
    We have tested the scenarios where the EMEA VPN itself is down, but the EMEA employees are still able to connect via the US, because the INTERNAL network (and its tunnel to EMEA) is still active.
    The problem that arose this weekend was, that ALL of the EMEA site was offline, including the WSUS server. So even if EMEA employees connected to the VPN, when the NAC agent checked the WSUS update status, it would time out looking for the EMEA WSUS server.
    So, as a workaround I had to tell ISE not to perform WSUS checking for the EMEA group.
    However, this is a manual process, and not acceptable in a 24/7 environment.
    Does anyone have suggestions on how to correct this single point of failure? Can you identify a secondary WSUS server on the client so that it tries to talk to both at any given time? Is there some setting in ISE?
    Honestly, this ISE implementation has been a HUGE thorn in my side....and it seems just when I think we are able to put it behind us...some other little detail comes out of the woodwork like this. I just want this to work, and make things better and smoother...not keep having little issues and it reflecting bad on myself and co-workers.
    Dirk

    Hi,
    I had the same issue and upgrading to 1.1.2 made the issue quiet down a bit. I have a few reported issues but havent seen any in the past 2 weeks. Also which supplicant is the client running and do they see these on the laptops or machines that have both wired and wireless connections?
    The reason I ask is that the native windows supplicant tends to connect to both networks (wired and wireless), this can can cause some problems with the NAC agent if the link for the wired or "the lower metric route" flaps.
    the bug cisco provided me is related to "CSCuc70607".
    Hope this helps,
    Tarik Admani
    *Please rate helpful posts*

  • How to create a custom DACL in ISE

    Hello once again,
    I'm puzzled over the note that I found at
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/ise/1.0/user_guide/ise10_authz_polprfls.html#wp1136540
    Namely the one that says:
    The Name and DACL Content fields require that values be entered and are marked with an asterisk (*).
    How would I interpret it? What's the proper syntax to create an DACL?
    I created my own one the way I would do it in ACS, i.e.
    ip:inacl#1=permit udp any host 192.168.1.100 eq 53
    ip:inacl#1=deny ip any 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0
    ip:inacl#2=permit ip any any
    But it doesn't work when I apply it to the authorization profile

    Sorry about that, WLC do not support the dacl feature, this for switches and ASAs that support DACL feature. I assumed you were wanting this for wired.
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/ise/1.1.1/compatibility/ise_sdt.html
    Here is the note that metions this in the release notes:
    4
    Wireless  LAN Controllers (WLCs) do not support downloadable ACLs (dACLs), but  support named ACLs. WLCs prior to release 7.0.116.0 do not support CoA  and require deployment of an ISE Inline Posture Node to support posture  services. Use of Inline Posture Node requires WLC version 7.0.98 or  later. Autonomous AP deployments (no WLC) also require deployment of an  Inline Posture Node for posture support. Profiling services are  currently supported for 802.1X-authenticated WLANs only on the WLC with  CoA support. HREAP is not supported. WLCs do not currently support MAC  Authentication Bypass (MAB).
    thanks,
    Tarik Admani
    *Please rate helpful posts*

  • ISE web auth for non-cisco switch(D-link 3528)

    Is it possible to use ISE(inline posture node) to redirect the wired users to ISE guest portal ?
    And the wired users will get full network access after they pass the web auth.

    you can use ISE ln-line posture node with 3rd part switches
    RADIUS access device must supply the following RADIUS attributes:
        Calling-Station-Id (for MAC_ADDRESS)
        User-Name
        NAS-Port-Type
        RADIUS accounting message must have the Framed-IP-Address attribute
    VLAN, DACL features can be used  but again it depends on switch models let us know  specific switch  models . Certain advanced use cases, such as those that involve posture assessment, profiling, and web authentication, are not consistently available with non-Cisco devices or may provide limited functionality,

Maybe you are looking for