Issue at query level aggregation

Hi All,
I have a query in 3.5 which has aggregation on it. Because of this aggregation the performance of query is very bad.
Now we plan to develop new query in bi 7. How should query aggregation be handled in bi 7?
Ex: Emp id,     salary of ASC,    Number of ASC   total
       100           10                     10                        10 * 10 = 100
       200           20                     20                        20* 20 = 200
       300          30                       30                      30*30   = 300
Formula used in 3.5
   Total = salary of asc * number of asc *(aggregation at emp id)
Is there anyway i can avoid aggregation in front end? Please suggest
Thanks,
Gowri

Hi,
See if value of any of the characteristics is changing in the report. You will get aggregated values for KF only when your characteristics values are similar. Whenever the characteristic value is changing, you will get different record in report.
Regards,
Yogesh.

Similar Messages

Display Of Material at the Query Level

Dear all,
I have an issue at query level....we have Material categeorized into
Material types like   1) Raw Materials, ROH
                            2) Intermediate and INT
                            3 Finished products ..FIN
in Raw materials we want to disply only one Material ..but this Material type has many materials but user need to disply only one meterial XXX and in material Type Inetermediate and Finished Product user needs all the materials ..
i mean i want to display one Material From Raw Materials (ROH) and All materials from Intermediate (INT) and finished products(FIN) ....
Points will be assigned
Regadrs
venu

As mentioned by me below follow the step by stpe procedure:
1) Create a new structure in 'ROWS'.
2) Under the structure create 3 new seletions. (Right Click to see the option)
3) First Selection :- drag the Material and Material Type to right window. Restrict the Material (single one XXX which u mentioned before) and material type ROH
4) Second selection : drag the Material Type and restrict it to INT
5) third Selection:- Drag the Materila type and restrict it to FIN.
Hope I am clear on the above steps...
- Amit

Customer Exit in query on aggregation level

Hi,
I try to have variables filled with a customer exit.
The coding of the customer exit is correct, this have been tested in queries on multiproviders.
Unfortunately it is not working when these variables are used on level of aggregation levels.
What I would like to achieve:
We have some planning queries on aggregation levels. Different users can plan on the same query (and aggregation level), but not for the same set of data. Therefore the query should be restricted to the authorized values. Unfortunately we can not switch to the new authorization concept (analysis authorizations) yet, but we already need this functionality very soon.
The customer exits are the only possible option. Unfortunately it seems that the customer exits are not being executed when the variables are used in queries on aggregation levels.
The variables are not ready for input and should be filled in I_STEP = 2
Is this normal? If so, is there a work around?
Thanks in advance for quick replies!
Kind regards,
Bart

Hi,
You can debug your query by putting the break-point in your exit code and execute the query in RSRT. This way you will be able to find if your customer exit is actually being called or not. If it is being called then there can be some logical problem with your code due to which the variable values are not getting populated.
Regards,
Deepti

Exceptional Aggregation Option at Query Level in BW 3.5 Query Designer

Hi all,
I want to use Exceptional aggregation with reference char 0CALDAY,on Formula keyfigure in the Query designer(BW3.5).
But I am not getting that option when I went into Properties of that Keyfigure.So please Suggest me where I will Find that Exceptional Aggregation option & Ref.Char at the Query level.
Thanks,
Kiran Manyam

Hi
In the Key Figure Properties dialog box, choose Enhance >>. The Aggregation Behavior field is added to the dialog box.
You can make settings for the aggregation of the calculated key figure and the time that the calculated key figure is calculated here. Depending on the complexity of the formula, you can select various settings in the enhanced properties of the calculated key figure. The following types of calculated key figures with the corresponding formula complexity are available:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/6f/56853c08c7aa11e10000000a11405a/frameset.htm
Hope it helps

Aggregation at Query level

Hi,
Does the aggregation at query level will not work in BI7.
As i have a key figure with aggregation type summation in backend,there were some similar records when tried to set aggregation at query level it is not working summing the key figures.
Any suggestions.

Are you sure there is no exception aggregation defined?

Issue In query output

Hello Gurus,
I am having an issue with query output.Please find below the details of it
Unsold claims: Total---> 200
Dispatch: Total--->118,086
Unsold claims/dispatch--->0.001694
This should be the output but its coming --.0033120 because itu2019s dividing with max value in dispatch which is 60,386.
Reason: The aggregation property of Dispatch is max value. I am not supposed to do any changes in Modeling. So can we do any thing at reporting level to get the desired output?
Desired output---->0.001694
Output coming---->.0033120
Please help me in getting the desired output at query level.
Regards,

solved with the help of nested exception aggregation

Query level formula is not working for all the amounts

Hi Friends,
In my production system I found new thing that in my query level I done some calculation (as per my requirement I done amount devide by 100 to get correct values)
It is working for all the amounts except 1or 2 amounts, im uploading same source file for all the amountsu2026 why it is happening like this u2026and is there any availability to change those 1 or 2 values at data base tables level or at any pleace (I hope in SAP it is may not possible)u2026can any body tell me why it is happening like this. u2026 because of this issue only my report is pending to sign off u2026.please can any body find the solution ASAP.
Regards,
VENKAT

Are they non decimal currencies?
If yes, create RKF1 on amount field excluding the currencies for which you are not getting currect values then in CKF or formula as RKF1 / 100. Similarrly create another RKF2 on amount only including the currencies which are excluded in RKF1, create a CKF or formula as RKF2/10000. Then created another formula wich adding CKF1 and CKF2.

WEB BEx Analyzer Comments on Query level

I would like to enable BW users to create comments for some queries an enable other user to read them. System BW 7.01.
Issues and questions:
-how to create comment on query level - it's always on data (KYF), Metadata or Master data level
-I would like to show the document icon - next to the query title (it's relevant for the query)
-when I create Comments (with the button in the standard template), it's on the data level (combination of KYF) - and when I
switch to icon display (settings) I get icons in every line. If this would be just at KYF header??
-where can I edit, delete, ... recorded comments
Thanks, Tom

Hi Tom,
1) If you want to create comments on query level, you need to create metadata documents, object type 'ELEM', object name is the technical name of the query.
2) Document icons are always shown in the data table. Thus it will be hard to show a document icon for a document on query level. If you are using web templates, you can insert a single document item on metadata documents to display the comment on the query.
3) Where the document is displayed depends on the document properties. If a characteristic is document property depends on the infoobject setting -> transaction RSD1 -> enter the characteristic -> tab 'general'.
To see the document properties you can execute the query for example in RSRT (html mode) -> create a new document on any cell. On the bottom you will see the document assignment. Compare this assignment with the cell next to it. If its the same the document will be displayed in both cells. The same can be done for example in java web -> create a new document and switch to the second tab ('BI').
4) Documents can be edited and deleted in the document browser itself, when you open the document in the executed query or in transaction RSA1 -> documents.
Best regards,
Janine

HOw to achieve this at report/query level

Hi Experts
Please update me how can i achieve this at query level
Lets Consider Data in my Cube
Dept_id--Date--
Qty
-101.01.20093-----
-101.01.20095-----
-101.01.20098-----
-101.01.20091-----
-101.01.20099-----
That is how data is avaliable in my cube
When i run the report the output is displayed as
Dept_id--Date--
Qty
-101.01.200926-----
That is what it actually do...it will sumirises into one record.....
BUT
My requirment is the query result should be ....with out summarisation
Dept_id--Date--
Qty
-101.01.20093-----
-101.01.20095-----
-101.01.20098-----
-101.01.20091-----
-101.01.20099-----
Please update me is there any setting i can make at query level

Hi,
By default data will be aggregated in Query.
How come data available in Cube at different aggregation level...? due to request no or some other characteristic which is unique for each record...??
If some other characteristic available, make it available that characteristic in rows to get desired result.
Srini

URGENT HELP PLS : Issue with Multi Level Master Detail block

This is an issue someone else had posted in this forum few years back but there was no solution mentioned, I have run into this same issue , The problem is as explained below.
Any help on this is appreciated.
Scenario:
There are 3 Blocks in the form : A (Master Block)
: B (Detail of A )
: C (Detail of B )
There is master detail relation created between A and B and B and C. So initially when we query for a record in Master A, it shows all records properly in B and C.
Now if i navigate to the first record of B , and then second record of B , records corresponding to that record shows up properly in C block.
Till now everything works fine.
Issue 1:
But in case after querying initially on Master Block A,If I go directly to the second record of B block, it clears the whole B block and C block.
Issue 2:
Same thing happens if I am on C block ( corresponding to second record of B block) and then navigate to first record in B block , it again clears the whole B block and C block.
Please Help !!
Thanks !

Thanks Xem for Your reply , I tried those settings but it did not help..here is the original link that to the thread that talks about the same problem ,
Issue with Multi Level Master Detail block
The last update to this was the following :
"I figured out that this is happening because Block Status is set to 'Changed' and this is causing it to clear out the blocks.
But cant figure out why the status is setting to 'Changed' "
Any Help from the form Gurus on this form in this matter is truely appreicated !!
Thanks,
Zid.

Query level filter not working in Webi report

Hi All,
I am using BOXI R3.1 (SP3), m facing one problem when refreshing Webi report on daily basis. I am using three query level filter as a prompt, but i checked one filter is not working then i need to reapply this filter and rest 2 filter is working fine.
Can anyone suggest me why problem is coming?
Regards,

Hi,
Prompts are interactive, and come from the query panel. Filters are not interactive, and are set on the report or block. There are also input controls, which are interactive filters
1. Select the universe in the list of universes to open the Query Panel.
2. Drag the Year object to the Result Objects pane.
3. Drag the Number of Guests object to the Query Filters pane and create a report filter that restricts Number of Guests to greater than n.
4. Click Combined Query.
The Combined Query pane appears in the bottom left of the Query panel with the two queries joined by UNION.
5. Click on the second query and remove the Year and Number of Guests objects.
6. Drag the Reservation Year object to the Result Objects pane.
7. Drag the Future Guests object to the Query Filters pane and create a report filter that restricts the future guests to greater than n.
8. Click Run Query.
Best Regards
Naveen

Date to Month Conversion at Query Level.

Hi,
I have Net due date in the Info provider.
At query level i have to create a restricted keyfigure based on Net Due Month.
Is there any way i can calculate Net due month at runtime and then create the restricted keyfigure using the net due month instead of using net due date directly(linke 01-10-2010 to 31 -10-2010 for october 2010).
Thanks and Regards,
MuraliManohar.

Hi,
Is there any way i can calculate Net due month at runtime and then create the restricted keyfigure using the net due month instead of using net due date directly(linke 01-10-2010 to 31 -10-2010 for october 2010).
you can calculate , but as he said you can add in cube , may be for cal month you are taking som eother date field.
in this case write one customer exist code .
create one varaibel on netdue date with customer not ready input (if user wants to enter input then ct=reate user entry varaible with reday input by using customer exit).
in routine wriet the code as when that varaible .
l_s_range - high , low and give then take the month form that date
like netdue date +0(6)-- gives month and year
netdue date +0(2)-- gives month
then rtestrict that variable with your keyfigure.
Thanks & Regards,
sathish

Logical Formula at query level?

I have requirment like if D = 0 then ' ' (SAPCE) else E / F.
I dont know how to get space ?
please help me to create this formula at query level?

hi Hari,
I am not really sure ,but u can try this...
if D = 0 then ' ' (SPACE) else E / F.
use the same formula and make it Zero instead of space and then in the Query properties replace Zero with Blank or Space Values.
Rgds
SVU123
Edited by: svu123 on Sep 30, 2010 6:53 AM

View Link Editor Issue - empty query clause if based on association

JDeveloper 10.1.2
Setup:
- entities A and B
- a 1 to * association from entity A to entity B (A_B_association)
- a view of A based on entity A (AView)
- a view of B based on entity B (BView)
- BView has an expert mode query
Create a view link from table A to table B:
- choose the A_B_association under AView for the source attribute
- choose the A_B_association under BView for the destination attribute
- click add
- click next
issue: the query clause is empty
- click next:
info dialog pops up;
title = "Business Components"
message = "Restoring the default where clause."
Note, however, that creating a view link based on the attributes works. That is, if I choose the primary key attribute under AView for the source attribute, and the corresponding foreign key attribute under BView for the destination attribute, then the wizard generates the expected query clause.
If I create a new project and recreate the entities, the views, and the association, then I can successfully create a view link based on the association. The foreignKey value on the association end was different in the new association XML file. I modifed the old XML file so that it used the same foreignKey element, but that did not seem to work.
I am guessing that this is some sort of user error on my part or that we have otherwise managed to squat up our XML files.
Any tips, hints, or ideas appreciated.
Thanks,
Steve

The problem is in AView.
We had modified the AView at one point, then reverted it to a default view of entity A. Here, "a default view" means that we undid our custom changes (apparently not thoroughly enough); that is, we did not delete it and create a default view from scratch using the contextual menu on the A entity.
The bottom line is that the AView attributes were not being mapped to the entity -- they were showing up as calculated attributes.
We created a "New Default View Object..." from the contextual menu of entity A, then manually corrected the AView.xml file to solve the problem.

Infoset resulting multiple results at query level

Hi,
I have joined 1 DSO and 1 Infocube in Infoset.. Mapped Plant, Material and Batch
DSO
Plant     Material      Batch      Caldate         Qty
P1          M1          B101          01/02/2014     1000
P2          M2          B102          05/02/2014     2000
Infocube
Plant          Material         Batch     Caldate               %
P1               M1               B101          02/02/2014          20
P1               M1               B101          05/01/2014          20
P2               M2               B102          07/02/2014           15
I'm considering date only on DSO and ignoring Infocube date. When I execute the report for the month of February, report output is as follows.
Plant   Material     Batch     DSODate         Qty           %
P1          M1               B101     01/02/2014          1000          40 (Summing up with January Date)
P2          M2               B102     05/02/2014          2000          15
I want data % value to be 20%.
Is there any possibility to change at query level or join level.
If we have one line item, data is correct but not the case with multiple line items.
Kindly do the needful!
Thanks
SS

Hi,
When you join the two infoproviders in the infoset ignoring infocube date, you are creating as many records for each record in DSO. That means for the first record the infoset creates :
Plant     Material      Batch      Caldate         Qty     %
P1          M1          B101          01/02/2014     1000 20   (for first row in infocube)
P1          M1          B101          01/02/2014     1000   20 (for second row in infocube)
I also think same as Anshu, you have all the common characteristics, you can as well use a multiprovider.
regards
Yasemin...

Issue at query level aggregation

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for