Issue - CIF queue for activation of IM requiring manual activation.

Hi,
For inbound setting, the CIF queue for activation of IM is getting stuck with ready status. Consequently the background job getting failed with time limit exceed status.
The same queue when activated manually, gets cleared. Thus requirng manual intevetion.
Please suggest solution to get rid of this manual intervention.
Thanks and regards,
Sushant

Hi Sushant,
If you use inbound queues check QIN scheduler on SCM side - transaction SMQR.
From help:
Call transaction SMQR and choose Registration.
Enter the queue name CF* and make the required settings.
EXEMODE: Execution mode (D - Dialog work process; B - Batch work process)
MAXTIME: Maximum runtime that the QIN scheduler uses for activating a destination;
default value: 60 seconds
USERDEST: RFC destination with LOGON data. Specification of a logical destination
with its own language on the local
system. This means that the burden of integration can be distributed to a server group.
NRETRY: Number of repetitions for failed calls, default value: 30
RDELAY: Wait time between individual calls, default value: 300
Regards,
Alexander

Similar Messages

Critical issue - delta queues for LIS empty after upgrade BW3.5

The delta queue in R/3 for LIS sources (S260-261-262) remains empty,
even after a successful init delta. Hence I cannot extract delta
records.
BW3.5
PI2004.1
Does the BW upgrade has an effet on the delta queue management in R/3 ?
The previous configuration BW2.0B PI2004.1 did work fine in that
respect.
Laurent Querella
BI Consultant ALTI

Laurent,
from OSS Note 534296 'LBW0: DataSource generation possible for SAP info str.' you can read:
"(...)it is no longer possible to generate DataSources for info structures (transfer) Snn delivered by SAP (where nnn is between 001 and 500) in the BW interface for LIS info structures (TR: LBW0) in the OLTP. (...)The corresponding DataSources are delivered with the Business Content."
I think this is the issue...
However, are you saying that all infostructures are empty ?
And from where your init is taking data ?
After an init your delta tables have to be empty...did you empty all these tables before doing your upgrade ?
Bye,
Roberto

Firefox freeze if left unattended for approximately 1 min & require manual shutdown.

Recently, Firefox will freeze if left unattended.

If I read all that correctly,..
1. Booting into Safe Mode appears to bypass the problem
2. Booting clean does not avoid the problem.
3. Booting normally into another account does not avoid the problem.
Does that sound like the situation so far? You might want to boot into Safe Mode again to verify it.
No need to maintain that clean-boot state.
Time to check the hard drive.
Check your hard disk for errors
-Jerry

"Message Queued for submission" performance counter high for Exchange Server 2010 Database

Hi,
We are receiving SCOM Alert as "Mail Submission service is experiencing issue: Messages Queued for Submission-sustained for 15 mins-RED (>25)".
After checking the "Messages queued for Submission" counter on the repective server it was found that the value is 66 but when we check the queue viewer we dont observe any messages stuck in Submission queue.
Would like to know what aspects can be checked here, in order to troubleshoot the issue?
The counter shows 0 value in perfmon for all other mailbox databases.
Thanks & Regards.

Hi,
This is a known issue with Exchange Server 2007 and Exchange Server 2010. We do not recommend that you use this counter for health alerts.
I recommend you refer to the following article:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2921142/en-us
It is caused by the MailSubmission service submits a message for delivery multiple times, the counter is incremented two times but decremented only one time. This situation can leave the counter with a positive value even though there
is no message in the queue. When you restart the service, the counter is reset.
Here is an similar thread for your reference:
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/c9b485a5-ef0e-4b9a-851e-28c4a4c0606a/msexchangeis-mailbox-messages-queued-for-submission-keeps-increasing?forum=exchangesvradminlegacy
Thanks.
Niko Cheng
TechNet Community Support

CIF Queues generated without active integration model

Hello All,
We are facing a unique issue, where queues are seen in SCM queue manager although those products are not there in any active integration model for transaction data.
The scenario is as follows:
1. We are CIFing only master data as we have only DP and release to R/3
2. There is active integration model for master data
3. There is no integration model for transaction data
However in SCM queue manager, I am seeing queues of type CFFCC "Location" "Product".
The function module name is /SAPAPO/CIF_IRQ_REDUCT_INBOUND.
We observed in R/3 that the goods movement transaction code MB1A is trigerring TRFC's which is generating the queues.
Has anyone encountered a similar scenario like this?
Regards,
Kedar

Oi Jackeline!
Hello, all!
I think Vikas got the point, but let me be more specific...
The transfer of requirement reduction depended in previous releases (until PI 2002.1) only on an integration model for material master data being active. Then a new type of integration models was created to control the sending of requirement
reduction.
To activate the new logic a flag has to be set in customizing.
Use transaction /CFC9
OR
R/3 SAP Customizing Implementation Guide
-> Integration with Other SAP Components
-> Advanced Planning and Optimization
-> Application-Specific Settings and Enhancements
-> Settings and Enhancements for Requirement Reduction
-> Evaluate the Requirements Reduction Filter Object Type:
Then, flag 'Filter Object Requirements Reduction'
If you set this flag no queue of type CFFCC* will be sent if there is no explicit active integration model for Requirements Reduction. Please set this flag in production and delete any existing queues of type CFFCC*. No new such queues should be created in the future as long as you don't activate the transfer via an integration model.
I hope this information helps to clarify this issue.
Please give your feedback concerning the given solution.
Thank you!
Will

Known Issue: Visual Studio Tools for Universal Windows Apps Requires Windows 10 Build 10074 or later (Windows 10 Insider Preview SDK and tools, April 2015 release)

The Visual Studio Tools for Universal Windows Apps requires Windows 10 build 10074 or later. If you use an earlier build of Windows 10, you will see a notification in Visual Studio, the XAML designer will not be available, and you will get the following
error when deploying apps to your local machine:
Error : DEP0700 : Registration of the app failed. Deployment Register operation with target volume C: on Package
<package ID> from: (<path_to_AppxManifest.xml>) failed with error 0x80073CFD. See
http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=235160 for help diagnosing app deployment issues. (0x80073cfd)

To work around this issue, either
Use Windows 8.1 and deploy to the Windows Mobile Emulator
Or, update your computer from an earlier Windows 10 flight to build 10074 or later. To do this,
in Settings, open the Update & security section, and select the
Windows Update tab. Then click Check for updates.

CIF QUEUE in R3

Hi,
For the CIF Queues in R3, i could see the errors in SMQ1 and SMQ2 ..how do we find the cause of the error,
Pls answer,
Regards,
Dhanush

Hi,
Many a times, you see the reason in the error itself.
For example., you may see the error "Integration model not active for material XXX in Plant YYYY".
For finding the root cause , you will have to study the related processes in detail( how the process is performed in SAP ECC or APO).
From experience, the majoirty cause of the errors could be attirbuted to 1. Master Data Errors, 2. job / process failures 3. Bugs
Please refer to OSS note 563806 ( FAQ: APO CIF) , which is gives a very good insight in CIF issues, best practices etc.
Regards
Datta

CIF Blocking for SNP CTM Run

Hi Folks,
We are implementing CTM solution for a HTDM client. It is the same APO instance where one company is already live on APO and CTM runs are taken on Sunday, Monday, Tuesday, Thursday and Friday on a weekly basis. Now for this new company implementation, we need CTM run to happen everyday at end of the day. Since the client is in USA, we can't have CTM run till 9PM EST since there are end users in west coast as well. But due to busness requirements, we need to complete the CTM runs and publish orders by 8PM EST. No comromise possible on this
Here is the critical issue. CTM run requires CIF Qs to be blocked during the run time. When we run CTM for company 2, if the CIF Qs are blocked, company 1 will face issues since their business is on else where. Is there a way to run CTM and block CIF Qs only for company 2? It is possible for data transfer block from APO to ECC but what we are concerned is to block ECC to APO data for company 2 only. If this can be achieved, the issue of conflict with CTM runs gets resolved.
Has anyone faced this issue or is aware of a solution to this problem? Kindly reply back.
Thanks,
Chandra

Hi Chandra
Does the customer use same client for both company ?
If yes, is there any relation between the data of company 1 and company 2 ?
(Same location products are used ?)
If the data is related, it is better to lock CIF queue.
(Since incoming data can have influence on running CTM
as described in Note 487261 / 528913).
But if the data is not related (different location products are processed,
I think you do not need to block CIF queue from ECC to APO).
best regards
Keiji

FW CS6 Error message: An error occurred. This command requires an active document.

Hi,
I've been seeing the following message while saving active documents recently: An error occurred. This command requires an active document. My document does indeed save.
I'm wondering if a recently-installed (and much-loved) extension could be the cause?
Has anyone else seen this?
Thanks!
--Lucija

As far as similar problems, I recently opened Fireworks 8 to test the File Management button (the Put command in particular) and found that it triggered an alert message normally produced by Aaron Beall's "Deform to Path" command:
I tried closing the Path panel, and the alert message was still triggered. (I do have that command also available within the Commands menu, but I'm not sure what was going on there; however, since I don't use Fireworks 8 much anymore and never use the Put command, I decided to leave it alone.)
Currently, I use Fireworks CS6. Several months ago, I noticed a "migrating panel" bug, where panels within the default configuration had been mysteriously swapped for one another: The Color Palette panel had been replaced by Lorem Ipsum, while the Path panel had gone missing, replaced by the Color Palette panel—bizarre behavior, to say the least. I tried reselecting a default Workspace (as well as a saved one), but it had no effect on the problem. I still haven't taken the time to diagnose and fix the issue, but I suppose it might have somehow been triggered by the Lorem Ipsum panel, which was a custom installation.

CIF Queue naming

Hi,
Can anyone guide me to any link where I could find the naming conventions for CIF queues (Like CFSTK* = Stocks queue, CFSLS* = Sales Orders queue etc..)
Ashutosh Kulkarni

Hi Ashutosh,
Here are few of them with naming convention:
Initial Data Transfer          CF_ADC_LOA
Stocks                         CFSTK*
Purchase Orders and Purchase R CFPO*
Planned Orders/Production Orde CFPLO*
Sales Orders                   CFSLS*
Manual Reservations            CFRSV*
Confirmations                  CFCNF*
Planned Independent Requiremen CFPIR*
Requirements Reduction of Plan CFMAT*
Production Campaigns           CFPCM*
Master Data for Classes        CFCLA*
Master Data for Characteristic CFCHR*
Shipments                      CFSHP*
Planning Tables                CFCUVT*
Hope this is what you require?
Pramod

CIF Queue gettign stuck in 'ready' state

Hi,
I am facing a problem in using CIF functionality while transferrting Master data and transaction data from R/3 to APO.
I have selected inbound queue processing for APO system and have also registered the queue in APO.
But when I actually CIF any data, it gets stuck in the outbound queue of the R/3 system in 'Ready' state.
Then I always need to manually activate the queue in SMQ1 to transfer the data to APO.
The same thing happens during online transfer of transaction data.
I want the data to be transferred automatically rather tahn activating the CIF queue each time.
Please help.
Thanks,
Ameet

Hi Ameet
Please following setting.
1. User setting
-R/3 T-CD CFC2 (For debuf Area, please check whether your user has "R" or not)
-APO T-CD /SAPAPO/C4 (For debug, please check whether your user has "R : debug on" or not)
2. Queue scheduler setting in both system
Inbound scheduler
T-CD SMQR please make sure whether you have inbound scheduler setting.
If there is not, you can create it by hitting Registration button.
"Registration" => Queue Name CF*, and lest of it can be leave as default.
Outbound scheduler
T-CD SMQS
Please make sure you have entry to your SCM system.
Type should be "R". If it is not R, outbound scheduler is not activated.
So please select entry and and hit registration button again. Then type will change
to "R".
I hope this help your problem.
Keiji Mishima

Lock Queue for a particular Partner No.

Hi All,
We want to lock the RFC queue for a particaular partner No. is this possible in SAP?
Background : We are having a maintainace activity on one of our middle ware, hence there would be changes done to a particular and critical interface. The middle ware team has requested that they should not receive any IDOCs during this time but as the activity is for a substantially high time, we cannot stop the batch which generates the critical Idocs during time as the critical IDOCs can be generated only for N and N-1 day only (Activity may last for 3-5 days depending on the outcome). We would want to lock the queue for a particular Partner No. so that once these IDOCs are generated they can be waiting in queue untill the queue is released and the target system has all the IDOCs required by the time the system is handed over to the bussiness.
P.S : We are transfering IDOC through TRFC call to the target system.
Can you please suggest?
Regards,
Anand.

Hi Anand,
As per SAP documentation
Creating an Outbound Partner Profile (SAP Library - IDoc Interface/Electronic Data Interchange)
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/dc/6b7f5643d711d1893e0000e8323c4f/content.htm
When you assign a port number for IDOC partner profile, this port number is mapped to a RFC destination.
Either you can hash out port <-> RFC destination mapping or hash out the RFC destination host mentioned in SM59.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Deepak Kori

CIF queues - Lock not possible error in application log

hi,
Below is the application error log from SLG1
Looks when R3 is sent CIF queue, could not be processed at APO, due to lock not possible. It looks, the object is already locked.
This happens only certain hours only. We searched in batch jobs etc across landscape, but no luck.
We are currently checking, if this could be due to some issues with LiveCache processing.
Any input would be helpful.
SLG1 - Application log errror:
Source system: sapapp80 user: R3CIFRFC transaction: function module: /SAPAPO/CIF_CLAF_INB
Access block: data from system CLAF updated again
Lock not possible for charc at FM claf_inb:000000000100020361G21C02244Z
Object is locked at present
Thanks,
RajkS

Hi Raj,
Pls check the table CIF_IMOD details in R3 System,if 2 IM running with the same object we use to get these kind of
locking issue.
also check the workprocesses details during those time. whether you have enough space to process the reqd the
t-data.
Regards
DPS

Query on CIF Queues

Hi Apo Experts,
I am having some queries on CIF queues...
> I am getting below SYSFAIL error in outbound queues at APO Side.
I can see that error text as " Material status does not allow a planned independent " . But there is no material number in the error text. So i double clikced the queue again. then i get the below screen which gives information about LUW , whichj is very very long ....
Q1. How to know the material number in this particular queue ? I have posted the same question in previous post and i got reply that u need to keep clicking the queue until u find material number. I have done the same , but i didnt find any material number. I was getting this LUW Information , which is very long and it is in digital coding .
(""" I have checked these queues in SCM Queue Manager also, and i was unable to find the material numner )
Q2. How to process this Queue again ? Can i maintain the Material Status in ECC Side and process this queue again ?
Q3. One question on LUW. Does all the material numbers which are assigned in one Particular Integration model form a single LUW ??
Suppose i have given 10 materials in a integration model X and another 5 materials in another integration model Y , Then there will be two LUW's .. is it right ??
Q4. ( this may question may sound stupid but still.... ) .. Outbound queue in APO gets created when we are transferring something from APO to R/3 , and system was unable to process. So due to the error, an Outbound Queue gets created . My question is , If suppose there is a porblem in R/3 side, then whether an Inbound queue gets created at R/3 side ?? Or only Outbound Queue in APO gets created ?? or both gets created ??
I am having above serious doubts and working on the same. Request to kindly provide your inputs .Thanks to all for your time and support. Good Day !!
Regards,
Raghavendra

Hi Emani,
Below information is based on best of my knowledge and experience, please try and let me know i this helps.
Q1. How to know the material number in this particular queue ? I have posted the same question in previous post and i got reply that u need to keep clicking the queue until u find material number. I have done the same , but i didnt find any material number. I was getting this LUW Information , which is very long and it is in digital coding .
(""" I have checked these queues in SCM Queue Manager also, and i was unable to find the material numner )
Ans: Please follow below steps
SMQ1/SMQ2 --> double click on queue name ---> again double click on queue name ---> again double click on queue name.
You will reach on a screen with heading , here you will be able to see material name and other information;
Q2. How to process this Queue again ? Can i maintain the Material Status in ECC Side and process this queue again ?
ANS: This will depend on the error message you are getting under status column, if this is due to some temporary reasons, then you can try executing by pressing execute button , or you might need to delete the queue ---> remove reason of sysfail ---> regenerate the queue.
Q3. One question on LUW. Does all the material numbers which are assigned in one Particular Integration model form a single LUW ??
Suppose i have given 10 materials in a integration model X and another 5 materials in another integration model Y , Then there will be two LUW's .. is it right ??
ANS: Please check below link for more details on qRFC administration
qRFC Administration - Connectivity - SAP Library
Further for different objects different LUWs got formed i.e. Sales Orders, Purchase Orders, Stock etc., you can find more information on qRFC communication model in below link.
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_06/helpdata/en/48/9be66e1f84062ee10000000a42189d/content.htm?frameset=/en/48/9c44f92ab0062fe10000000a42189d/frameset.htm
Q4. ( this may question may sound stupid but still.... ) .. Outbound queue in APO gets created when we are transferring something from APO to R/3 , and system was unable to process. So due to the error, an Outbound Queue gets created . My question is , If suppose there is a porblem in R/3 side, then whether an Inbound queue gets created at R/3 side ?? Or only Outbound Queue in APO gets created ?? or both gets created ??
ANS: Queues are getting created whenever you transfer some data from one system to another, if there is some issue then the queue doesn't get cleared, it gets stuck.
If you are sending data from ECC to APO then it creates outbound queue in ECC and if it gets cleared then an Inbound queue in APO.
Hope this answers your query.
Rgds
Sourabh

Is it a proper way to use queue for consumer/producer model?

Hi all,
I am following the example of consumer/producer model to use the queue to synchronize the following process: The producer is a loop to produce N numbers, I will put every generated number into an array and after every 5 numbers generated, I put the array into the queue and pass it to the consumer. I have to wait the consumer use up the data and it will then remove the element from queue so the producer will get a chance to produce another 5 numbers. Since I set the maximum size of the queue to be ONE, I expect the producer and consumer take turns to produce / consume all five numbers and pass the chance to the other. Here is my code
when the case box is false, the code will be
For the first 5 numbers, the produce will generate every thing right and put that into the array, and it will pass the array to the quere so the consumer will get a chance to loop over the array. I except the procude's loop will continue only when the queue is available (i.e. all elements are removed), but it seems that once the consumer start the loop the produce 's loop will continue (so the indicator x+1 and x+2 will show numbers changed). But it is not what I want, I know there must be something wrong but I can't tell what is it.
Solved!
Go to Solution.

dragondriver wrote:
As you said in 1, the sequency structure enforcing the execution order, that's why I put it there, in this example, to put the issue simple, I replace the complete code with number increase, in the real case, the first +1 and +2 must be executed in that order.
Mikeporter mentioned:
1. Get rid of all the sequence structures. None of them are doing anything but enforcing an execution order that would be the same without them.
So even if you remove the sequence structure, there will be a fixed & defined execution order and that is because LabVIEW follows DATA FLOW MODEL.
Data Flow Model (specifically in context of LabVIEW): A block diagram node executes when it receives all required inputs. When a node executes, it produces output data and passes the data to the next node in the dataflow path. The movement of data through the nodes determines the execution order of the VIs and functions on the block diagram (Click here for reference).
Now in your code, just removing the sequence structure will not make sure that the execution order will gonna remain same but you need to do few very small modifications (like pass the error wire through For loop, before it goes to 'Dequeue Element' node).
Coming to the main topic: is it a proper way to use queue for consumer/producer model?
The model you're using (and calling it as consumer/producer model) is way too deviated from the original consumer/producer model model.
dragondriver wrote:
For the second one, yes, it is my fault to remove that while. I actually start from the example of Producer/Consumer design pattern template, but I didn't pay attention to the while loop in the consumer part.
While loops (both Producer & Consumer) are the essential part of this architecture and can't be removed. You may want to start your code again using standard template.
I am not allergic to Kudos, in fact I love Kudos.
Make your LabVIEW experience more CONVENIENT.

Issue - CIF queue for activation of IM requiring manual activation.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for