Issue regarding perform on commit statement

Hi,
I have a requirement like below.
I have a test to see if SAP issues a COMMIT WORK at the end of the datapacket, and allows update tasks to be executed .and check whether the second datapacket succeed in getting the lock, or fail because it has not been dequeued.
For this i have written code in the end routine of DTP like below.
1. Called enqueue fm
2. Created a custom table and taken loop at result_package and get the values to the internal table.
3. I have created an updated function module to call perform on commit inside the function module. Since we canu2019t directly call the commit work in the end routine of DTP. And in the form endform i am updating the custom table from internal table.
4. Called dequeued fm.
But the issue is i am notable to bedug the code (perform <form name> on commit) (cursor is not going to the inside the perform) inside the function module even though i enabled the update task in debugger setting and used F9 to set the FM for debug.
Can any body help me on this
Thanks,
Nagendra

did you try by setting a manual break-point inside the code and then going step by step (by pressing F5) ?

Similar Messages

BI ABAP Issue regarding perform on commit statement

Hi,
I have a requirement like below.
I have a test to see if SAP issues a COMMIT WORK at the end of the datapacket, and allows update tasks to be executed .and check whether the second datapacket succeed in getting the lock, or fail because it has not been dequeued.
For this i have written code in the end routine of DTP like below.
1. Called enqueue fm
2. Created a custom table and taken loop at result_package and get the values to the internal table.
3. I have created an updated function module to call perform on commit inside the function module. Since we canu2019t directly call the commit work in the end routine of DTP. And in the form endform i am updating the custom table from internal table.
4. Called dequeued fm.
But the issue is i am notable to bedug the code (perform <form name> on commit) (cursor is not going to the inside the perform) inside the function module even though i enabled the update task in debugger setting and used F9 to set the FM for debug.
Can any body help me on this
Thanks,
Nagendra

did you try by setting a manual break-point inside the code and then going step by step (by pressing F5) ?

Nested perform on commit error

hi all,happy new year 2006
in my custom transaction upon save,
iam calling a Func module in update task passing all the internal tables which contain the update data.
inside this FM iam doing table updates without commit and also calling change document funcs ( open,single/multiple case/close) to update the CDHDR and CDPOS tables.
iam also calling BAPI_SALESORDER_CHANGE inside this update task FM. after the call iam calling BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT.
Iam getting an update task termination message saying that there are nested perform on commit statements happenening in some some SAP prog call and therefore it causes a dump. i have seen that the fm 'CHANGEDOCUMENT_CLOSE' calls a 'perform on commit'.
but not able to figure out where exactly is the problem.
any suggestions.
thanks a lot.

Hi KP!
I'm sure you can't call BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT in an update task - there a commit is a forbidden statement.
I had a short look at CHANGEDOCUMENT_CLOSE:
*    don't call this form on COMMIT when you are already in a form on
*    commit
    IF sy-oncom = 'P'.
      PERFORM swe_event_create_changedocumnt.
    ELSE.
      PERFORM swe_event_create_changedocumnt ON COMMIT.
    ENDIF.
At least here (and on release 640, ERP 5.0) a different coding for update tasks is executed.
Do you have a shortdump, where you can check exact place of the nested call? Or is this a generation error -> again try to check exact place.
Regards,
Christian

Perform on commit

Hi,
can you show me an example of "perform on commit" with variables.

Hi,
PERFORM ON COMMIT routines are not executed in the dialog module.
You must ensure that any subroutines called using ON COMMIT can be delayed until the next COMMIT WORK in the calling program. Remember that the global data of the dialog module is destroyed along with the internal session when control returns to the calling program. Consequently, subroutines called using PERFORM ON COMMIT must not use this global data.
The statement PERFORM ON COMMIT calls a subroutine in the dialog work process. However, it is not executed until the system reaches the next COMMIT WORK statement. Here, as well, the ABAP statement COMMIT WORK defines the end of the SAP LUW, since all statements in a subroutine called with PERFORM ON COMMIT that make database changes are executed in the
database LUW of the corresponding dialog step.
The advantage of this bundling technique against CALL FUNCTION... IN UPDATE TASK is better performance, since the update data does not have to be written into an extra table. The disadvantage, however, is that you cannot pass parameters in a PERFORM... ON COMMIT statement. Data is passed using global variables and ABAP memory. There is a considerable danger of data inconsistency when you use this method to pass data.
You can also put the CALL FUNCTION IN UPDATE TASK into a subroutine and call the subroutine with:
<b>PERFORM SUBROUT ON COMMIT.</b>
If you choose this method, the subroutine is executed at the commit. Thus the request to run the function in the update task is also logged during commit processing. As a result, the parameter values logged with the request are those current at the time of the commit.
Ex.
a = 1.
PERFORM F ON COMMIT.
a = 2.
PERFORM F ON COMMIT.
a = 3.
COMMIT WORK.
FORM f.
CALL FUNCTION 'UPD_FM' IN UPDATE TASK EXPORTING PAR = A.
ENDFORM.
In this example, the function module UPD_FM is carried out with the value 3 in PAR. The update task executes the function module only once, despite the two PERFORM ON COMMIT statements. This is because a given function module, logged with the same parameter values, can never be executed more than once in the update task. The subroutine itself, containing the function module call, may not have parameters.
Regards,
Bhaskar

Issue a commit statement for every 10000 rows updated

Hi,
I have a update statement, updating huge number of records.
I wanted to issue a commit statement for every 10000 rows updated.
Can this be done?
Thanks,
Dinesh

user522952 wrote:
Hi,
I have a update statement, updating huge number of records.
I wanted to issue a commit statement for every 10000 rows updated.
Can this be done?
Thanks,
Dinesh Why do you want to issue commit statement frequently? Do you have a possible reason?
If you think it will improve performance, you are 200% wrong. It will not improve performance it will only degrade performance. It will destroy the integrity of your data. It will screw you up big time.
Ever heard of [ORA-01555 Snapshot too old|http://asktom.oracle.com/pls/asktom/f?p=100:11:4217554330904383::::P11_QUESTION_ID:275215756923] error? Your approach has a likely chance of getting that too.
Do it in a single UPDATE. How big the table is does not matter. Do it in a single update, Oracle is fully capable of doing it.

Regarding performance issue in time dependent hierarchie.

hai
we are loading time dependent hierarchies from flatfile to bw,it is weekely load,we have nearly one million records loaded,we got an issues regarding change of these hierarchies timely.when ever there occurs a change in hierarchy a new row is added to the table,it is degrading the performance,can any one of you please suggest how to over come performance related issues regarding time dependent hierarchies.
Regards
Srinivas.G

hello deven,
if you are only focusing on your application's performance
on the aspect of usability i.e. less waiting time, fast
response UI, i would personally suggest you to use AJAX.
put some processing part on the browser side and making
data retrieval from MI asynchronous... this way, your user
don't have to wait for all data to be presented, but rather
could work on the data presented in pieces (i.e. asynchronously).
anyway try googling for AJAX...
regards
jo

Commit statement in badi method

hi all,
i am using commit statement in badi method save_data, it is put after function module,
in function module i have used insert and update statement, if i do like that then the commit statement refresh the global data but update the table,
if i create one perform inside function module and put commit statement in that perform, then it shows message update was terminated,
i also want the global data for processing thats why i can't use commit statement after FM in method, please give Suggestion,
Points will be awarded.

Hi,
sounds as if you call that FM in update task. Update function modules do not allow all actions. They should only include the neccessary SQL statements and must include any COMMIT.
For more information read SAPDOCU of COMMIT WORK and everything of SAPS update concept (start immed. V1, start delayed V2 and so on).
ATTENTION. Most BADIs designed to save customers data may be used several times and standard data may be saved after them. To avoid inconsistent data inside those BADIs normally no COMMIT should be done.
Kind regards,
HP

Interrupt a perform-on commit.

Hi all,
How to interrupt a perform which is done on ON-COMMIT statement.
Will the ROLLBACK WORK will effect..
Thanks & Regards,
Neslin.

Hi,
You can use the abort message to stop processing..
MESSAGE A208(00) WITH 'PERFORM FAILED'.
Thanks,
Naren

Commit or no commit statement in procedure

Hi all,
i have two version of the same procedure.
procedure A
--loop
---fetch into record
--update a flag as processed
commit;
end loopprocedure A'
-- loop
--fetch into record
--update a flag
end loop In procedure A, i do a commit after every row. In A', i do not issue any commit statement. Will oracle auto commit the changes done in A' after the procedure finishes?
Because i realise in procedure A, it takes a long time finish. Whereas in A' it takes a relatively less time to finish.
Any harm if i choose procedure A' ?

Any harm if i choose procedure A' ?No.
But this way I prefer to commit.
Commit inside the loop surely slow down the performance.
If it is a huge table, then commit after every few set of trasactions will be advisable.
Procedure A
loop
fetch into record....
update or whatever your task....
end loop;
"commit";
end procedure A.

I am having an issue regarding a placed order via customer service department

I recently relocated to Anchorage Alaska as part of a permanent change of station per the United States Air Force. I was initially located on the East Coast in the lower 48 and at the time of activating my contract I had purchased two separate Iphone 4 devices. I also recently went in to a store in February to purchase a Nexus 7 as well.
Upon arrival in Anchorage I had multiple issues regarding the Iphone 4 devices including being unable to send and receive text messages & imessages, unable to make phone calls, dropped phone calls, unable to utilize GPS, as well as not being able to access general account information and use anything related to web browsing or data usage. It was determined that because the Iphone 4 operates on the 3g network and Verizon does not have a 3g network in Alaska, as a result I was utilizing an extended service network from another carrier. As a result of this I am only able to use my Iphone 4 devices while connected to my wi-fi network while within my home, which is totally unacceptable.
I was not made aware that I would be dealing with this when I moved to Alaska and inquired as the the use of the devices I currently owned prior to purchasing the tablet. I was assured by three separate store employees one of which being a manager that all devices would function at 100% efficiency including the Iphone 4s. In fact I was recently billed 350$ for roaming charges last month, which prompted me to speak with a representative via the online chat regarding the significant increase she said that she was unable to process any sort of credit to the account regardless of what I had been told at a local Verizon store where I purchased the tablet.
As a result of all of these mishaps since arriving here in Alaska I determined I was in need of newer devices that utilize the 4G LTE network currently provided by Verizon in Alaska. I know for a fact that the 4G LTE works great up here because my Nexus 7 tablet runs flawlessly and does not incur roaming charges when utilizing the 4G LTE network.
Yesterday I attempted to contact Verizon through the live chat feature regarding upgrading two of the devices on my account. The live chat representative immediately asked me when my upgrade date was. Upon telling her my upgrade date 9/29/2014 she told me I should contact the customer service department as I might be eligible for an early upgrade. I then proceeded to contact the customer service department using my Iphone 4.
My attempt to speak to anyone in the customer service department resulted in a merry-go-round of being put on hold 6 separate times by two different employees, both of which had me wait for more than an hour while they attempted to speak to a manager to gain approval for an early upgrade. The first rep seemed almost sure she would be able to have my devices upgraded early especially considering the issues I was having regarding service.
The second rep seemed newer and was very dodgy about my questions and was very unwilling to help at first. He even mentioned that I had been a Verizon customer for almost two years, had never missed a single payment and had outstanding account history which should have garnered some sort of importance to the level of my request. But I digress, during this time I was disconnected from the call twice from each separate representative.
Both reps assured me they would call me back, I never did get a call back from either one of those reps and I was becoming very frustrated having waited four hours trying to find some sort of solution to my current predicament.
After waiting an hour for the second representative to call back I grew impatient and contacted the customer service department, was put on hold again, and finally reached a third customer service representative who was able to provide a solution for me.
I explained everything I had been dealing with to Cory ID # V0PAC61, both regarding the phones, the issue of the level of service I was receiving, the dire need for working devices and the multiple times I had been disconnected. I explained to him as a result of these issues I was certainly considering switching to a different provider, a local provider even who could provide me the adequate service that I require for my mobile devices.
I explained to Cory that I had been with Verizon for almost two years, and I had been on a relatives account prior to owning my own Verizon account and had never received this kind of treatment when trying to work towards a simple solution. Cory proceeded to tell me he needed to put me on hold to see if there was anything that could be done regarding the upgrades of the device considering all of the trouble I had been dealing with.
After Cory reconnected with me in the phone call he was able to successfully reach a solution by allowing me to upgrade my devices. We conversed about the options available and I eventually decided to upgrade both Iphone 4 devices to Moto X devices as we determined those would be sufficient for my needs while in Alaska. I also proceeded to add two Otter Box Defender cases to the order so that the devices would have sufficient protection. Cory inquired as to whether or not I would like to purchase insurance for the phones as well and I opted for the $5.00 monthly insurance which including damage and water protection.
Cory explained to me the grand total for the devices which included an activation fee of $35.00 for each device, $49.99 for each Otter Box case, and an additional $50.00 for each device which would be refunded as a rebate upon receipt of the devices and activation, a rebate that I would be required to submit. Cory explained to me that the devices would most likely arrive Tuesday of 6/17 and no later than Wednesday 6/18.
Cory took my shipping information and told me everything was all set and the only thing left to do was to transfer me to the automated service so that I could accept the 2 year agreement for both devices. I thanked him very much, took his name and ID# so that I might leave positive feedback about his exemplary customer service and was then transferred to the automated service.
Once transferred to the automated service I was then prompted to enter both telephone numbers for the devices that would be upgraded, I was then required to accept the new 2 year agreement for both devices and after doing so I was required to end the call. I did so in an orderly fashion and expected a confirmation # to arrive in my email regarding the placed order.
I have never received a confirmation email. I decided to sleep on it and assumed a confirmation email would be sent sometime tomorrow. Nothing has since been received however. I woke up early this morning around 6AM Alaska time to speak to another live chat representative, Bryan, in the billing department who assured me the order was currently processing and verified the order #. I asked him whether or not it was typical for a customer to not receive a confirmation email for an order placed and he said it can sometimes take up to 2-3 business days. He then stated that he had taken note of the issues I was experiencing and told me he would transfer me to the sales department as they would be able to provide more information regarding the shipment of both devices and a confirmation email, as he stated he did not want me to have to wait any longer than necessary to receive said devices.
I was then transferred to Devon in the sales department via the live chat service where I was then required to repeat everything I had said to both Bryan and the other representatives I had spoken too. After a lengthy discussion and repeating everything I have just wrote he told me the order was indeed processing and that he would send a confirmation email in the next 30 minutes.
That was 2 hours ago. It is now 8am Alaska time and I still have not received a confirmation email regarding my order. I was sent an email by Verizon an hour ago stating I had a device to "discover". The email contained no information regarding the shipment of my device, the order confirmation number, or anything regarding my account. The email I received was a typical spam email asking an individual to check out the current available phones and sign up for a new contract.
All I want is a confirmation email to assure that the devices are being sent. I need my phone for work and to communicate with my family in the lower 48. I desperately need to make sure that the device is in fact being sent to the proper address, this is why a confirmation email of the order is so important. I do not care about the shipping speed I just want what I ask to be taken care of for a change. I would hate to sit here unable to determine what the status of my devices are only for the order to be stuck in "processing" limbo and be unable to receive the devices when I was told they would be sent.
I feel I have been given the run around treatment way more than is typically given with any company when an individual is trying to work towards a solution. I have been patient and cordial with everyone I have spoken with, I have not raised my voice or shown stress or anger towards the situation I have only tried my best to work towards a solution with anyone I have spoken too but I am becoming increasingly frustrated with this situation.
Any help regarding this matter would be greatly appreciated. This situation has left a sour taste in my mouth and if the devices were indeed not actually processed in an order, or they were not shipped correctly, or in fact if the order had never existed at all it will only deter me from keeping my Verizon account active and affect my decision to switch to another provider.

Hello APVzW, we absolutely want the best path to resolution. My apologies for multiple attempts of replacing the device. We'd like to verify the order information and see if we can locate the tracking number. Please send a direct message with the order number so we can dive deeper. Here's steps to send a direct message: http://vz.to/1b8XnPy We look forward to hearing from you soon.
WiltonA_VZW
VZW Support
Follow us on twitter @VZWSupport

Issue regarding Planning layout is not getting rendered and is dumping at : CL_RSDRC_TREX_QUERY_LAYER ~ _GET_PARTPROVS_WITH_TREX_PART in SAP TPM IP

Gurus,
I am facing an issue regarding SAP TPM IP ( HANA)
I have 3 Infoproviders
Planning infocube, Planning DSO1, Planning DSO2 and i created multiprovider and added these 3 infoproviders into it. I have created Aggregation level on multiprovider. Created Bex Input ready query on Aggregation level.
Issue is Planning layout is not getting rendered and is dumping at : CL_RSDRC_TREX_QUERY_LAYER ~ _GET_PARTPROVS_WITH_TREX_PART.
I tried debugging it and found it is trying to read i_r_pro -> n_ts_part. It is populated with only 3 values (i.e. 2DSOs and 1 Cube), whereas <l_partprov>-partprov is referring to Aggergation level, hence read statement isn't successful, it is dumping.
The class CL_RSD_INFOPROV_CACHE->GET() method is trying to populate the N_TS_PART.N_TS_PART uses P_R_INFOPROV table which seems to be already populated. So, I debugged all the below methods to find out how the P_R_INFOPROV but couldn't find any clue.
Can any one help,it would be really help.
Thanks
Ashok

Hello Gregor,
On the launch of planning layout it throws an error message:
Planning is not possible RSCRM_IMP_CORE008.
When I debugged, i got to a point wherein
particular Real Time Planning DSO is
not getting retrieved under the MultiProivder in below class.
Class: CL_RSCRM_IMP_ACTIONS_SERVICE, Method: GET_INFOPROV is not
returning the real time Info-Provider Name(i.e. Planning DSO)
underlyingthe Multiprovider.
I've also tried to run the report mentioned by you for the Multiprovider but issue still exists.
Let me know, if you have any pointers on this topic.
Thanks,
Jomy

Payroll issue regarding the Claims - /561 and /563

Hi Payroll Experts,
I have a payroll issue regarding the Claims - /561 and /563 (October PY Run)
When i m runnning the Current month Payroll(October PY Run), Total Earning - total deductions are not matching with Net Pay. later i came to know that the system creates the WT /561 and deducts from the Net Pay.
But as per the Employee Payment Details , there is no recovery required from the employee for the past one year. But even then the system creates the WT /561. and deducts the same from NET Pay.
The followng are the WT details
IN - Period
OCT 2011
     /101 Total gross amount     118,897.00
     /110 Net payments/deductions     76,070.00-
     /550 Statutory net pay     95343
     /551 Stat.net recalc.diff.     37,692.00-
     /552 Stat.net subs.adjustment      37,692.00-
     /559 Bank transfer                                                   34,317.00
     /560 Net pay     37,218.00
     /563 Claim from previous month     5,609.00
FOR Period
Sept- Oct
     /101 Total gross amount     49,213.00
     /110 Net payments/deductions      31,721.00-
     /550 Statutory net pay     41,529.00
     /551 Stat.net recalc.diff.     14,591.00
     /552 Stat.net subs.adjustment     23,101.00-
     /553 Recalc.diff.to last payr.     37,692.00
     /559 Bank transfer                                                   14,591.00
     /560 Net pay     14,591.00
     /561 Claim     5,609.00
I request some body to throw siome light on the same.

Hi Experts,
Thanks for everyone for replying to my query ,
I have a doubt that If you check the WTs /551 and /552 in the IN PRD, the negative sign is coming for both the WTs
Is it correct?
And also, Assume that there may be a master data changes like Bank details and other deduction Wts happened in the month of Aug and now i m going to run the payroll for the month of Nov,
some of the employees having differences in the Net Pay, Eventhough the employee is having sufficient balances.
So how do i handle this issue
IS ther any way to solve this differences?
Please Let me know how to solve this issue.
Thanks

Issues with performance and RAM previews

Just did a major system upgrade from an iMac to a Mac Pro, and now I'm having an issue with performance...specifically with RAM previews.
When I try to do a RAM preview with audio, it grinds my entire OS to a hault (can't switch apps, or click on much of anything). It eventually clears up enough for me to stop the RAM preview.
So, I'm wondering if maybe my Memory & Multiprocessing settings might be off.
Here are my system specs:
Mac Pro
2 x 2.4GHz 6-Core Intel Xeon (12 cores)
64GB RAM
ATI Radeon HD 5870
AE CS6 (11.0.2.11)
AE is installed on an SSD drive and the scratch disk is an internal HDD.
Here are my AE Memory Settings:
Here's my GPU Info:
Let me know if any other info is needed...

You are reserving far too little RAM for other software.
See this: "Performance tip: Don't starve your software of RAM."
(Also, I recommend going through all of these materials: http://forums.adobe.com/thread/543440 )
Regarding the SSD: Putting your application files on it means that applications load/boot faster. This is fine, but that benefit is just when you first start the application. If you put your cache files on it, then you get the benefit every time that something is read from or written to the cache---i.e., many times per second, for the entire time that you're working. Put your cache files on your SSD. BTW, there's no reason to not put your application files and caches on the same SSD. The reason that you split things across multiple disks is to prevent simultaneous reads and writes to and from a slow disk; the program loading from disk happens at a different time than reading and writing cache files, so there is no potential for conflict and slowdown.

How to execute commit statement in a procedure optionally?

We have a procedure which has DML operations and at the end there is a commit statement.
I want to execute commit statement optionally.
Like, when procedure runs directly it must execute commit statement, but when this procedure is called from a trigger don't run commit.
As you know commit operation is not allowed in triggers.
How can I understant the code is triggered from a trigger or any other (manuel exec or from another procedure).
I am looking for the reserved word that solve my problem. Like INSERTING, DELETING ....
Serkan
Thanks.

Hi oraserkan,
You do of course know it's dangerous to have a commit inside a procedure?
Consider this:
SQL> create table t (text varchar2(25))
Table created.
SQL> create or replace procedure p
as
begin
   insert into t(text)
       values ('Insert PROCEDURE');
   commit;
end p;
Procedure created.
SQL> insert into t(text)
    values ('Insert SQL')
1 row created.
SQL> exec p
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL> rollback
Rollback complete.
SQL> select * from t
TEXT
Insert SQL
Insert PROCEDURE
2 rows selected.You should instead clearly state the procedure has a commit by making it autonomous, and then have two procedures, one that commits, and one that don't
SQL> drop procedure p
Procedure dropped.
SQL> drop table t purge
Table dropped.
SQL> create table t (text varchar2(25))
Table created.
SQL> create or replace procedure p_transactional
as
begin
   insert into t(text)
       values ('Insert PROCEDURE');
end p_transactional;
Procedure created.
SQL> create or replace procedure p_autonomous
as
   pragma autonomous_transaction;
begin
   p_transactional;
   commit;
end p_autonomous;
Procedure created.
SQL> insert into t(text)
    values ('Insert SQL')
1 row created.
SQL> exec p_autonomous
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL> rollback
Rollback complete.
SQL> select * from t
TEXT
Insert PROCEDURE
1 row selected.
SQL> drop procedure p_transactional
Procedure dropped.
SQL> drop procedure p_autonomous
Procedure dropped.
SQL> drop table t purge
Table dropped.Regards
Peter

HT1365 Hi can anyone help with this issue regarding my wireless magic mouse? When im on google chrome and scrolling down the page i always have youtube running in the background but the audio cuts/spits/pops can anyone help me with this?

Hi can anyone help with this issue regarding my wireless magic mouse? When im on google chrome and scrolling down the page i always have youtube running in the background but the audio cuts/spits/pops can anyone help me with this?

The figures you mention only make sense on your intranet. Are you still using the same wireless router. The verizon one is somewhat limited as far as max wireless-n performace. For one thing it only has a 2.4 radio. I like many people who wanted wireless-n performance before they even added a wireless-n gigabit router, have my own handling my wireless-n network.

Issue regarding perform on commit statement

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for