Issue while posting the invoice in background using the WF-BATCH user

Hi Friends,
  I am facing an issue while posting the invoice in background using the WF-BATCH user. I am using a invoice approval workflow where in when the approver approvers the invoice the invoice document get posted using a background method, which uses BO FIPP and Method POST and i am returning the Message Text to my workflow container from this method. When i see the log an exception is rasied from this method with an error  message "V004: You are not authorized to change this document", but WF-BATCH is having SAP_ALL and SAP_NEW authorizations. If i try to post the invoice using the method from my user id it is getting posted. What could be the issue. Please advice.

Hi Sapient,
The Parameter, Roles would be different for the LOGIN USER and WF-BATCH.. So ask your administrator
to set the Roles & Parameters similar to that of LOGIN USER to WF-BATCH.
For further refrence check in SU01 giving the LOGIN USER and then check with WF-BATCH... you would
find the difference...
Hope this would help you..
Good luck
Narin

Similar Messages

  • Dummy Profit center issue while posting the transaction in FB60

    Dear SAP friends,
    We have implemented ECC6.0 version,
    I have the below issue:
    I am posting the document in FB60 transaction: after simulating the document system is throwing the error "Profit center 9937/FIREPRODMY does not exist for 14.08.2009"
    Message no. KM700
    Document spilitting active at Business area level..
    In 0KE5( maintain controlling area settings) I have not given the Dummy profit center.
    Eventhough it is asking for Dummy profit center while posting, Please let me know apart from the 0Ke5 settings do i need to remove the dummy profit center anywhere in the Config.
    I have not maintained any settings in FAGL3KEH, 3KEH and OKB9.
    No sunstitutions are active in the system.
    Please let me know from where i need to remove the dummy profit center.
    My client going live on 17th Aug 2009.
    Regards,
    Anand

    Hi,
    Check the validity period of the Profit Center 9937/FIREPRODMY. The valid from period should have the date same or earlier than 14.08.2009
    If not then change the profit center master data to be valid from an earlier date (Tcode KE52). Steps-
    KE52 - Profit Center FIREPRODMY
    Click Change Validity Period (Ctrl +F1)
    Valid from - put a date earlier or equal to 14.08.2009
    Click Activate (Shift + F1)
    Thanks,

  • Error occurs while posting the transaction by user in F-02

    Dear Friends,
    Kindly give me acceptable solution to the below error/ticket while user posting a transaction in F-02.
    ERROR: " system error in routine FI_TAX_CHK_PRICING_DATA_ error code 13 function builder TAX2"

    Hi,
    Please refer the link:
    http://sap.ittoolbox.com/groups/technical-functional/sap-acct/system-error-in-routine-fi_tax_chk_pricing_data-error-code-13-function-builder-tax2-853146
    Regards,
    Pramitha.

  • Error while posting the Goods Receipt

    Hi Friends,
    I am having an issue while posting the Goods Receipt.
    I am getting the error "Balance not zero: 1.000,00- debit: 0,00 credit: 1.000,00". I am using the Purchase Order with Account Assignment category P and K. When ever I used the account assignment category, I am getting this type of error. I have checked the configuration and every thing is OK. System is not able to debit the G/L account which is mentioned in the Purchase Order, hence the problem. However, I think system is able to get the G/L account (to Credit the amount) from Automatic Account determination.
    Would like to know if any one come across similar type of problem and resolved it.
    We have recently upgraded the system from 4.7 to ECC 6.0.
    Apprciate the help.
    Thank you,
    Prakash

    Hi
    Thank you for the reply.
    I have checked what you have mentioned. While creating PO it is determining the G/L account automatically through the assignments in OBYC. Even then I am getting the error while doing the Goods Receipt.
    Any one is having any idea?
    Thank you,
    Prakash
    Edited by: Prakash KM on Dec 17, 2010 6:26 PM

  • Error while posting the payroll results to accounts

    Dear all,
    Im facing a issue while posting the payroll results to the accounts in T.code PC00_M99_CIPE,
    The error log says...
    Inconsistence in payroll results (tables V0/RT)
    Diagnosis:
    An inconsistency results has been found during the evaluation of the payroll results. No referenced entry has been found in table V0.
    Can anybody suggest me wat i hav to do...
    Thanks & regards
    Gopinath.Balakrishnan

    Hi
    Check whether the user is having the authorisation for the t.code PC_PAYRESULT or PC00_M40-PAYRESULT.
    Because some times HR user will run the payroll and FI user will do the postings. If FI user is doing the postings, in general he will not have the authorisation for HR T.codes, then system will give such kind of errors.
    If not check the paryoll results and control record.
    Thanks & Regards
    Bharathi

  • How to get the pop up of Down Payment Clearing while posting an Invoice using MIRO tcode

    Hi,
    I am having a requirement where I need to display the Down Payment Clearing pop up.
    Scenario: While posting an Invoice, user have to check whether he had done any downpayment for the Purchase Order, if so, then there will be a Information displayed saying "Down Payment for Purchase Order xxxxxxxxx exist". Then user  has to click the Down Payment Clearing button in the header level, then a pop up window is displayed.
    But now my requirement is when the Information Message is displayed, if I click enter button to goto next screen, that time itself I need to display the Down Payment Clearing pop window, rather than clicking the down payment clearing button in the header level.
    Kindly suggest any user exit or badi to do this customization
    Thanks & Regards,
    Karthikeyan G.

    Hi,
    At the time of entering the invoice from MIRO/FB60, system gives a pop-up for downpayment clearing. If you go in the help, the following thing is mentioned in the part Procedure.
    Procedure
    Check whether a transfer posting or a clearing of special G/L transactions (for example down payments) is necessary after you have posted the present document.
    Here SAP has clearly mentioned that we can do the clearing after posting of this document.
    Regards,
    Amit
    Edited by: amit kulkarni on Nov 13, 2009 2:53 PM

  • Error while posting the IDoc for Customer Invoice.

    hi,
    I m posting Customer Invoice through LSMW using IDocs.
    Basic type is FIDCCP02 and message is FIDCC2.
    While posting the Idoc I m getting error as:
    'Document or line item does not exist for invoice reference'.
    I m not getting the error why it is asking for invoice reference because
    in FB01 it is not asking for any reference or anything.
    Even in f-22 also it is not asking for the same.
    In Idoc all the item level values are coming prorperly.
    If anybody worked on such issues then please reply.
    -Thanx.
    -Umesh

    Hi,
    Where you able to resolve your issue, I would appreciate if you can share the solution.
    Thanks

  • Issue While executing the Query for Pagination using ROWNUM with like

    Issue While executing the Query for Pagination using ROWNUM with like.
    Database is Oracle11G.
    Oracle Database Table contains 8-9 lakh records
    1) SQL equal (=)
    SELECT /*+ FIRST_ROWS(n) */ ROWNUM RNUM, A.* FROM LINE A
    WHERE A.REFERENCE = 'KMF22600920'
    Execution Time:- 0.00869245 seconds
    Returns 2 resultsets
    2) SQL like (one %)
    SELECT /*+ FIRST_ROWS(n) */ ROWNUM RNUM, A.* FROM LINE A
    WHERE A.REFERENCE = 'KMF22600920%'
    Execution Time:- 0.01094301 seconds
    Returns 2 resultsets
    3) SQL like (two%)
    SELECT /*+ FIRST_ROWS(n) */ ROWNUM RNUM, A.* FROM LINE A
    WHERE A.REFERENCE like '%KMF22600920%'
    Execution Time:- 6.43989658 seconds
    Returns 2 resultsets
    In Pagination, we are using Modified version of SQL Query 3) with ROWNUM as mentioned below :-
    4) SELECT * FROM (
    SELECT /*+ FIRST_ROWS(n) */ ROWNUM RNUM, A.* FROM LINE A
    WHERE REFERENCE like '%KMF22600920%' AND ROWNUM <= 20 ) WHERE RNUM > 0
    Execution Time:- Infinite
    ResultSets:- No as execution time is infinite
    a) Instead of like if we use = in the above query it is returning the 2 resultsets (execution time 0.02699282 seconds)
    b) Instead of two % in the above query, if use one example REFERENCE like 'KMF22600920%' it is returning the 2 resultsets (execution time 0.03313019 seconds)
    Issue:- When using two % in like in the above query i.e. REFERENCE like '%KMF22600920%' AND ROWNUM <= 20 ) , it is going to infinite.
    Could you please let us know what is the issue with two % used in like and rownum
    5) Modified version of Option1 query (move out the RNUM condition AND RNUM <= 20)
    SELECT * FROM (
    SELECT /*+ FIRST_ROWS(n) */ ROWNUM RNUM, A.* FROM LINE A
    WHERE REFERENCE like '%KMF22600920%' ) WHERE RNUM > 0 AND RNUM <= 20
    Execution Time:- 7.41368914 seconds
    Returns 2 resultsets
    Is the above query is best optimized query which should be used for the Pagination or still can improve on this ?

    This would be easier to diagnose if there was an explain plan posted for the 'good' and 'bad' queries. Generally speaking using '%' on both sides precludes the use of any indexes.

  • Pricing carries out again while posting the invoice

    The pricing carries out again at the time of posting the invoice and sometimes changes the values of original invoice. Is there a way we can restrict pricing to only creation of billing document and it should not be carried while posting the same
    Thanks in advance,
    Mohit

    Hi,
    Check your copy control settings from delivery to Billing Item.The Pricing type assigned over here.
    You can change the pricing type using the user exit if you do not want to control by config.If the pricing type has to behave based on your conditions then you can use the user exit to acheive the same.
    Also as suggested in one of the thread could impose posting block through Billing type and check and release to accounting.
    Regards,
    Saju.S

  • Posting period 011 2013 is not open while posting the document using F-02 getting the error

    Hi SAP Captains,
    Pls help me here.
    While posting the document using T-code F-02 getting the error "Posting period 011 2013 is not open.
    Please help me how to do, can you provide step by step.
    Rgds..Suresh

    Hi Suresh,
    You can search google and will get number of posts on this. This will lead to duplication of similar posts on forum.
    The message says "FI posting period is closed for 11th period of 2013". In which period you are trying to post the transaction?
    If it is past, open the FI posting periods in OB52.
    BR, Srinivas Salpala

  • Issue while archiving the processed file in sender communication channel using SFTP adapter

    Hi All,
    In one of my scenario (File to IDOC), we are using SFTP sender communicationchannel.
    we are facing an issue while archiving the processed file. Some times PI processed the file successfully but unable to archive it and in the next poll PI process & archives the same file successfully which will creates duplicate orders in ECC.
    Please let us know how to resolve this issue.

    Hi Anil,
    Refer Archiving concepts in below links.
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw73/helpdata/en/44/682bcd7f2a6d12e10000000a1553f6/content.htm?frameset=/en/44/6830e67f2a6d12e10000000a1553f6/frameset.htm
    http://scn.sap.com/docs/DOC-35572
    Warm Regards,
    DNK Siddhardha.

  • Issues while processing the BOMs using fm ''CSAP_MAT_BOM_MAINTAIN'

    Hi Group,
    we are facing issues while processing the BOMs using the basic type(Z-idoc type) for standard type BOMMAT04.
    thing is that the segment 'E1STPOM' is defined to contain 1 to 99999 records in it.
    when an Idoc is run(say with 150/200 segments of 'E1STPOM'), there was a standard error with error message id PIC01(number : 004) when the Idoc is processed with the Standard function module 'CSAP_MAT_BOM_MAINTAIN'.
    the error says 'Error reading material FING_005 . Exception: 0' and Check whether the material number is blocked. but when checked, the Material seems not blocked.
    kindly advise how to overcome this error and proceed further.
    Regards,
    Vishnu

    Checj the material status, while its transfer from one server to another server the status should be different

  • Error while posting Excise Invoice

    Hi Experts,
    I have captured incoming excise invoice for an Import PO of Asset material.
    GR has been made.
    Also partial payment to vendor has been done through MIRO.
    During check it do not show any ERROR message
    While posting Excise invoice , error message is displayed "ACCOUNTING DOCUMENTS NOT GENERATED"
    and immediately current session is closed
    How to solve the problem?
    Regards
    Jai

    Hi,
    Import cycle :-
    1. MIRO-Bill of Entry
    2. Excise Invoice capture
    3. Goods Receipt
    4. Excise Invoice posting
    5. MIRO -Vendor settelement
    Tcode you used for capturing excise invoice  -   j1iex
                                  posting the excise invoice.  j1iex
    Thanks
    jai

  • Direct store Delivery : Error while posting the customer payment in FSR

    Dear Experts,
    We are in the process of DSD implementation at customer place. We are facing the following isuse , your help will be highly appriciated
    This is with respect to an error we are facing when the collection clearing
    process iin final settlement Run.
    The details of the same are as follows:
    Transaction code: /DSD/SL_COCKPIT
    Area: Payment Posting
    Error: Balancing field "Profit Center" in line item 001 not filled
    The customer line item of the invoice being cleared has been assigned
    the profit center as part of the document splitting at the stage of
    invoicing to the customer.
    The bank account/cash account to be posted at the time of clearing in
    DSD settlement process is not capable of being provided as input nor
    available for configuration in the DSD section in IMG.
    regards
    Neleesh

    Hi
    Did you find the solution to this error. We are also facing the same issue while posting payment against the payment method 'Check'.
    Kindly help please.
    Regards
    Noman Rasheed

  • System Calculating HCess twise while posting MM Invoice through MIRO

    Dear Gurus,
    System calcuating Highter Cess twise while posting MM invoice through MIRO.
    Please guide where could be problem... Pls provide standard steps need to verfy one by one to analysis the same.
    Regards,
    Venkat

    Dear Santosh,
    We are using TAXINN-Condition based method. We are maintaing JSEP as HCESs condition and JHX1 as Off-setting conditiong type.
    But system calcuating condition value against both in IV........
    Regards,
    Venkat

Maybe you are looking for

  • How to convert the alv list data into pdf format

    Hi Expersts,                   Is it possible to convert the alv list output data into PDF format? if yes, then please help me with this issue. thanks in advance, Regards, Samad

  • Check box selection is failing

    I have a simple query with a checkbox that builds a report. select apex_item.checkbox (1,AVAIL_TIME, 'UNCHECKED', ':', 'f01_' || '#ROWNUM#')" ", avail_time, stid from sln_appt_temp3 order by avail_time; First thing I noticed was I had to change the c

  • Sharepoint autoselection of list view items

    A SharePoint web part page has a set of three list views that depend on each other. For example, Order > Order Details > Products. For filtering, there are Connections defined to Send Row Data from Order to Order Details and from Order Details to Pro

  • Nokia Lumia 710 WP 7.8 Equalizer

    Do Nokia realy think that WP 7.8 owners will buy Nokia once more??? We use it not only for calling we also listen music, but its inpossible with 7.8, the sound is like from deep hole, that why we need equalizer!!!! Do it pls!!!

  • Why can't I get the Amber update?

    Why amber update isn't available for me... My phone 520 ... and I am living in Iran... Moderator's note: We amended the title of this post as we moved it to the appropriate board.