Issue while querying invoices

HI,
While we are querying(with date) invoices from one user it is getting... But for another user it is not querying...
What is the problem here i am facing...
Thanks in advance...
Edited by: 875417 on Aug 26, 2011 6:38 AM

Make sure they are using the same responsibility.
Check if the 2nd user has a default folder with a saved query.
Using sysadmin > administer folders, delete the default folder and retry.
Hope this helps
Sandeep Gandhi
Independent Techno-functional Consultant

Similar Messages

  • Issue while query execution on web analyser.

    Hi,
    I am getting an error message while query execution on web ie Record set too large , data retrieval restricted by configuration .I am able to run the same query in bex analyser without any issue .Any idea what could be the reason and solution for this issue .
    Regards,
    Neetika.

    Hi Neetika,
    The Query is exceeding the set limits,i suggest you to Reduce the time LIne for the Query, as it may be having more number of Cells in terms of Rows and Columns.
    Execute the Query for Less number of Days,if u r executing it for 1 Month then execute it for 10 Days.
    Rgds
    SVU123

  • Issues while archiving Invoice documents

    Hi all,
    While archiving Invoice documents using MM_REBEL(using company code only), it was found that the write job is picking up certain open Invoices also. ie the subsequent Accounting document was not cleared/archived.
    My understanding was the system will check for retention periods and whether the subsequent documents are archived or not.
    I just wanted to know if there are any extra checks , which it looks for , as the criterion for archiveablility.
    Please let me know if anyone knows about this or if any of you have faced similar issues .
    Regards,
    Shail.

    hi,
    Dependencies
    The status of the document determines whether it can be archived:
    ·        Documents with the status Closed or Deleted can be archived.
    ·        Documents with the status Unchecked, Checked and Errors Found, or Checked and No Errors Found cannot be archived.
    Financial accounting documents generated when invoice documents are posted are not archived with the object MM_REBEL. They are archived in Financial Accounting.
    Residence Time/Retention Period of Data in the System
    The retention period for invoice documents can be configured in the Customizing system. The posting date contained in the invoice document header is the key date for the retention period.
    If a retention period has not been set in Customizing, the system takes the minimum retention period as 9999 days.
    Presettings
    In Customizing for Invoice Verification you can set the retention period for invoice documents per company code under Define Document Lives.
    Hope it helps..
    Regards
    Priyanka.P

  • Strange issue while printing invoice *** delivery challan

    Dear experts,
    I have a strange prob while taking out the printout of invoice ***/delivery challan.
    We have two different locations (plants) A and B.
    In sapscript layout we have defined GRN no and truckno in bottom windows and
    type of invoice on upper part windows.
    We are able to see complete output on preview in DEV,QAS,PRD
    but on PRD when we take printout , part of output gets skipped on printing
    though visible otherwise on preview.
    What could be reason ?

    Aditya,
    Generally you face such problems in HP Printers.
    Are u using HP laser Jet Printer .
    Ok let me generalise the issue , you gotta ask ur basis guy to istall the latest driver for that printer
    this will most probably solve ur problem.
    Remember that once u get the print preview right , its either problem with the Basis or the printer.
    If its a Z layout then ask ur Basis guy to check the internal setting as to at what height he is giving the page skip.
    Regards,
    Ravi Kiran

  • Performance issues while query data from a table having large records

    Hi all,
    I have a performance issues on the queries on mtl_transaction_accounts table which has around 48,000,000 rows. One of the query is as below
    SQL ID: 98pqcjwuhf0y6 Plan Hash: 3227911261
    SELECT SUM (B.BASE_TRANSACTION_VALUE)
    FROM
    MTL_TRANSACTION_ACCOUNTS B , MTL_PARAMETERS A  
    WHERE A.ORGANIZATION_ID =    B.ORGANIZATION_ID 
    AND A.ORGANIZATION_ID =  :b1 
    AND B.REFERENCE_ACCOUNT =    A.MATERIAL_ACCOUNT 
    AND B.TRANSACTION_DATE <=  LAST_DAY (TO_DATE (:b2 ,   'MON-YY' )  )  
    AND B.ACCOUNTING_LINE_TYPE !=  15  
    call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
    Parse        1      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
    Execute      3      0.02       0.05          0          0          0           0
    Fetch        3    134.74     722.82     847951    1003824          0           2
    total        7    134.76     722.87     847951    1003824          0           2
    Misses in library cache during parse: 1
    Misses in library cache during execute: 2
    Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
    Parsing user id: 193  (APPS)
    Number of plan statistics captured: 1
    Rows (1st) Rows (avg) Rows (max)  Row Source Operation
             1          1          1  SORT AGGREGATE (cr=469496 pr=397503 pw=0 time=237575841 us)
        788242     788242     788242   NESTED LOOPS  (cr=469496 pr=397503 pw=0 time=337519154 us cost=644 size=5920 card=160)
             1          1          1    TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID MTL_PARAMETERS (cr=2 pr=0 pw=0 time=59 us cost=1 size=10 card=1)
             1          1          1     INDEX UNIQUE SCAN MTL_PARAMETERS_U1 (cr=1 pr=0 pw=0 time=40 us cost=0 size=0 card=1)(object id 181399)
        788242     788242     788242    TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID MTL_TRANSACTION_ACCOUNTS (cr=469494 pr=397503 pw=0 time=336447304 us cost=643 size=4320 card=160)
       8704356    8704356    8704356     INDEX RANGE SCAN MTL_TRANSACTION_ACCOUNTS_N3 (cr=28826 pr=28826 pw=0 time=27109752 us cost=28 size=0 card=7316)(object id 181802)
    Rows     Execution Plan
          0  SELECT STATEMENT   MODE: ALL_ROWS
          1   SORT (AGGREGATE)
    788242    NESTED LOOPS
          1     TABLE ACCESS   MODE: ANALYZED (BY INDEX ROWID) OF
                    'MTL_PARAMETERS' (TABLE)
          1      INDEX   MODE: ANALYZED (UNIQUE SCAN) OF
                     'MTL_PARAMETERS_U1' (INDEX (UNIQUE))
    788242     TABLE ACCESS   MODE: ANALYZED (BY INDEX ROWID) OF
                    'MTL_TRANSACTION_ACCOUNTS' (TABLE)
    8704356      INDEX   MODE: ANALYZED (RANGE SCAN) OF
                     'MTL_TRANSACTION_ACCOUNTS_N3' (INDEX)
    Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
      Event waited on                             Times   Max. Wait  Total Waited
      ----------------------------------------   Waited  ----------  ------------
      row cache lock                                 29        0.00          0.02
      SQL*Net message to client                       2        0.00          0.00
      db file sequential read                    847951        0.40        581.90
      latch: object queue header operation            3        0.00          0.00
      latch: gc element                              14        0.00          0.00
      gc cr grant 2-way                               3        0.00          0.00
      latch: gcs resource hash                        1        0.00          0.00
      SQL*Net message from client                     2        0.00          0.00
      gc current block 3-way                          1        0.00          0.00
    ********************************************************************************On a 5 node rac environment the program completes in 15 hours whereas on a single node environemnt the program completes in 2 hours.
    Is there any way I can improve the performance of this query?
    Regards
    Edited by: mhosur on Dec 10, 2012 2:41 AM
    Edited by: mhosur on Dec 10, 2012 2:59 AM
    Edited by: mhosur on Dec 11, 2012 10:32 PM

    CREATE INDEX mtl_transaction_accounts_n0
      ON mtl_transaction_accounts (
                                   transaction_date
                                 , organization_id
                                 , reference_account
                                 , accounting_line_type
    /:p

  • Bank account number not reflecting while creating invoice some parties

    Hi All,
    We are facing following issue while creating invoice's for some particular parties.
    Bank account number is not reflecting while creating invoice at invoice work bench from front end. Bank account details are properly attached at party site level.
    Kindly guide us regarding this.
    Thanks,

    Hi Team,
    If you are getting XXXX in place of Bank number then the issue is at (Setup > Payment >Payment Adminstrator).
    Log into Payments Setup > Shared Setup > System Security Options. Now you will find "External Bank Account Masking Setting" & Number of Digits to Disp . Now provide the numer of digits to display.
    Thanks
    Vinod K

  • Performance issue while generating Query

    Hi BI Gurus.
    I am facing performance issue while generating query on 0IC_C03.
    It has a variable as (from & to) for generating the report for a particular time duration.
    if the variable (from & to) fields is filled then after taking a long time it shows run time error.
    & if the query is executed without mentioning the variable(which is optional) then the data is extracted from beginning to till date. the same takes less time in execution.
    & after that the period has to be selected manually by option keep filter value. please suggest how can i solve the error
    Regards
    Ritika

    HI RITIKA,
    WEL COME TO SDN.
    YOUHAVE TO CHECK THE FOLLOWING RUN TIME SEGMENTS USING ST03N TCODE:
    High Database Runtime
    High OLAP Runtime
    High Frontend Runtime
    if its high Database Runtime :
    - check the aggregates or create aggregates on cube and this helps you.
    if its High OLAP Runtime :
    - check the user exits if any.
    - check the hier. are used and fetching in deep level.
    If its high frontend runtime:
    - check if a very high number of cells and formattings are transferred to the Frontend ( use "All data" to get value "No. of Cells") which cause high network and frontend (processing) runtime.
    For From and to date variables, create one more set and use it and try.
    Regs,
    VACHAN

  • Issue while posting the invoice in background using the WF-BATCH user

    Hi Friends,
      I am facing an issue while posting the invoice in background using the WF-BATCH user. I am using a invoice approval workflow where in when the approver approvers the invoice the invoice document get posted using a background method, which uses BO FIPP and Method POST and i am returning the Message Text to my workflow container from this method. When i see the log an exception is rasied from this method with an error  message "V004: You are not authorized to change this document", but WF-BATCH is having SAP_ALL and SAP_NEW authorizations. If i try to post the invoice using the method from my user id it is getting posted. What could be the issue. Please advice.

    Hi Sapient,
    The Parameter, Roles would be different for the LOGIN USER and WF-BATCH.. So ask your administrator
    to set the Roles & Parameters similar to that of LOGIN USER to WF-BATCH.
    For further refrence check in SU01 giving the LOGIN USER and then check with WF-BATCH... you would
    find the difference...
    Hope this would help you..
    Good luck
    Narin

  • Issue While executing the Query for Pagination using ROWNUM with like

    Issue While executing the Query for Pagination using ROWNUM with like.
    Database is Oracle11G.
    Oracle Database Table contains 8-9 lakh records
    1) SQL equal (=)
    SELECT /*+ FIRST_ROWS(n) */ ROWNUM RNUM, A.* FROM LINE A
    WHERE A.REFERENCE = 'KMF22600920'
    Execution Time:- 0.00869245 seconds
    Returns 2 resultsets
    2) SQL like (one %)
    SELECT /*+ FIRST_ROWS(n) */ ROWNUM RNUM, A.* FROM LINE A
    WHERE A.REFERENCE = 'KMF22600920%'
    Execution Time:- 0.01094301 seconds
    Returns 2 resultsets
    3) SQL like (two%)
    SELECT /*+ FIRST_ROWS(n) */ ROWNUM RNUM, A.* FROM LINE A
    WHERE A.REFERENCE like '%KMF22600920%'
    Execution Time:- 6.43989658 seconds
    Returns 2 resultsets
    In Pagination, we are using Modified version of SQL Query 3) with ROWNUM as mentioned below :-
    4) SELECT * FROM (
    SELECT /*+ FIRST_ROWS(n) */ ROWNUM RNUM, A.* FROM LINE A
    WHERE REFERENCE like '%KMF22600920%' AND ROWNUM <= 20 ) WHERE RNUM > 0
    Execution Time:- Infinite
    ResultSets:- No as execution time is infinite
    a) Instead of like if we use = in the above query it is returning the 2 resultsets (execution time 0.02699282 seconds)
    b) Instead of two % in the above query, if use one example REFERENCE like 'KMF22600920%' it is returning the 2 resultsets (execution time 0.03313019 seconds)
    Issue:- When using two % in like in the above query i.e. REFERENCE like '%KMF22600920%' AND ROWNUM <= 20 ) , it is going to infinite.
    Could you please let us know what is the issue with two % used in like and rownum
    5) Modified version of Option1 query (move out the RNUM condition AND RNUM <= 20)
    SELECT * FROM (
    SELECT /*+ FIRST_ROWS(n) */ ROWNUM RNUM, A.* FROM LINE A
    WHERE REFERENCE like '%KMF22600920%' ) WHERE RNUM > 0 AND RNUM <= 20
    Execution Time:- 7.41368914 seconds
    Returns 2 resultsets
    Is the above query is best optimized query which should be used for the Pagination or still can improve on this ?

    This would be easier to diagnose if there was an explain plan posted for the 'good' and 'bad' queries. Generally speaking using '%' on both sides precludes the use of any indexes.

  • Issue while importing bex query into BO

    Hi EXperts,
                        I am using Bo xi 3.1 sp3 i am facing the issue while building the universe with bex query iam getting the following error   "Error getting measures for cube (cube name(0QM_C09_Q003)),It is giving this error, i resolved this error by check cumultave property in th measures,is it right to do like this or is there any other way to resolve the issue.
    Regards
    Suraj

    Hi Juhi,
    I am facing the same issue. BW query has three input parameters i.e. Year, Month and Profit center.
    I can create the service when query has only one input parameter i.e. Year. But when query has more parameter other than year, I cant create the service. Getting an error 'Association AZPROFIT_CToListOfValues: referential constraint property not found in entity ZMFIGL_ZFIGL_COST_FINAL_FIORIParameter.'
    As per your last reply, if we have multiple input parameters then it does not allow to create the service from BEX query. How did you resolve this issue. Please provide some details.
    Thanks in Advance.
    Abhishek.

  • Authorization issue while executing a Web Template in SAP BI

    Hello All,
    I am facing an issue while executing a webtemplate .
    I have a webtemplate which is being executed by end user, upon execution user must be able to fill in the value for data and submit. The query uses a characteristic KPI identifier ,SBU,BU,product, Region,Affiliate etc . All the mentioned charcaterisitics in Analysis authorization have * value except  KPI identifier and SBU. And Activity 02,03 is provided for the infoprovider.
    When a single value (Ex:KPI01) is provided in KPI identifier the webtemplate works fine in change mode. But when additonal value (Ex KPI02) is being added to the characterstic KPI identifier the webtemplate opens only in display mode. There is no authorization failure as well in the RSEC trace.
    Actually we created two separate roles for each KPI identifier earlier but when two roles provided to a user in combination it was behaving the way i mentioned above. So we tried to create a single role with two values of KPI Identifier in single analysis authorization and it is still the same.
    Please suggest what might be the reason for this behavior. Thank you
    Regards,
    Mohammed Ghouse

    Hi Brian,
    Thanks for your reply
    RSECADMIN does not show any missing authorizations when checked , but what is observed is that the check happens only on display
    These are the characteristics being checked by the query
    Characteristic      Content in SQL format
    OTCACTVT         GRI_IC005 IN ('KPI054','KPI055')
    GRI_IC005          AND GRI_IC007 = 'MFE'
                                AND 0TCAACTVT = '02'
    GRI_IC007
    Comparison with Following Authorized Set
    Characteristic      Content in SQL format
    0TCAACTVT      I CP *
    GRI_IC005        I EQ KPI054
                               I EQ KPI055
    GRI_IC007          I EQ MFE
    And it says its authorized. But still the screen is in display mode. What might be the reason for this behavior.

  • Error while creating Invoice

    Hi Experts,
    While Creating Invoice i am getting below error
    G/L account 0001 11002 cannot be posted to, please correct your entry
    Message no. >0205
    Diagnosis
    This G/L account is blocked against posting or is a reconciliation account and cannot be posted to directly.
    System Response
    The G/L account cannot be posted to.
    Procedure for System Administration
    Check you entry for errors, or change the master record of the G/L account: Proceed.
    I have taken lot of experts advises, but unable to solve. I have checked FS00, EK01 and EK02 and unable to find what problem is with these Tcodes.
    When i was trying to check Tcode FS00 i found G/L Account is "11002 - Constructions" and when i tried to see account group it was Balance Sheet Account and by experts advise i changed it to P&L Statement Acct, when i am opening Initially after saving Account Grp.Tcode FS00 it is showing Acct. Grp. as P&L Statement Acct and when i am choosing other tabs in FS00 the Acct Grp is Changing back to Balance sheet acct.. I am unable to find what wrong with this.
    I want to ask whether the problem is with above mentioned thing or with other, i believe i have explained my error in detail. Please advise how can i overcome this error.
    Regards,
    Kushal
    Moderator note - thread locked, same issue identified in G/L error while posting an amount - TXN: FPE1 - SAP ISU and Error while trying to do Billing

    Hi friends,
    The error thats triggered is "For object RV_BELEGnumber range 19 does not exist".
    I have deleted all the existing no ranges in VN01 and customized the nuber range for invoice doc and set it at Z1(Internal no range :1000-1999) and the existing no range entry in OBA7 for RV is 18(1800000000- 1899999999).
    Z1(Internal no range :1000-1999)  for Invoices
    Z2(Internal no range :2000-2999)  for Deliveries
    Z3 (Internal no range :3000-3999) for sales orders
    So my VN01 entries consists of Z1(Internal no range :1000-1999) ,Z2(Internal no range :2000-2999)  ,Z3 (Internal no range :3000-3999) .
    The sales orders and deliveries are working out fine but while generating the invoice its triggering the above message.
    Pl help on this.
    Thanks
    Ivy

  • Issue while insert and update data to DB tables

    Hello all,
    i am having an issue while insert the data to DB table.
    my scenario is DB1 to DB2. i had a sender channel with select query which fetches data from DB1 and inserts to DB2.
    so the select query will fetch the records that were INSERTED to DB1 and records that were UPDATED to DB1 and needs to insert/update to DB2 table.
    Now the issue is i am able to insert the records but not able toupdate the records to DB2 table due to primary key issue.
    im message mapping
    sender message type is as follows:
    <src_message1>
    ----<row>
    -------<fieldA>
    -------<filedB>
    -------<filedC>
    Receiver message type as follows:
    <trgt_message1>
    ----<STATEMENT_1>
    ----<TABLE_NAME>
    ----<ACTION> INSERT
    ----<TABLE>
    ----<ACCESS>
    ----<field1> primary key
    ----<field2>
    ----<field3>
    ----<field4>
    ----<KEY>
    ----<field1>
    ----<field2>
    ----<field3>
    ----<field4>
    my query in sender channel is : select filedA, filedB, filedC from test_table where createdate=sysdate or updatedate=sysdate
    so it feteches the data from DB1 and inserting to DB2 but not updating the records to DB2 due to primarykey issue.
    please suggest how to solve ....will it solve by using UPDATE_INSERT for action?
    Best Regards,SARAN

    Hi Nagarjuna,
    i have done the following changes to target mapping structure;
    1. action as UPDATE_INSERT
    2.  in access tab, i had mapped fieldDate to field4.
    3. in Key tab, i assigned the sysdate to field4.
    but issue still exist. could you please check my above changes are correct or not. if wrong please provide me the details that needs to be done.
    thanks in advance.
    i'm providing the error details again:
    my query in sender channel is : select filedA, filedB, filedC, FiledDate from TEST_TABLE where fieldDate=sysdate or updatedate=sysdate
    it returns 4 records as follows:
    fieldA--fieldB-fieldC---fieldDate
    1001----EU----  1----
        2011-11-10
    1002----CN----  0----
         2011-11-10
    1003----AP---- 1----
          2008-03-15 (already exist in DB2)
    1004----JP----  1----
        2007-04-12 (already exist in DB2)
    the first two records are created today and remaining 2 records are updated the fieldC from 0 to 1 ( in DB1 )
    while inserting these 4 records to DB2, we get the following error "java.sql.SQLException: ORA-00001: unique constraint (data.TEST_TABLE_PK) violated" .
    Best Regards,SARAN

  • WHAT ALL MESSAGE'S ISSUED WHILE CREATING PO

    Sir,
    ply let me know after saving the po i want to know what all messages were issued while creating the po.
    Like "warning" or "information" message
    where  can i see this
    regards
    amey

    Hi,
    PAth- Spro-MM-Purchasing-Environment Data-Define Attributes of System Messages...
    Here are few message type:
    Contract has different purchasing organization &     W
    Validity period of contract does not start until &     W
    Validity period of contract expired on &     W
    Target value of contract & exceeded by & &     W
    Net price for item & taken from conditions     W
    Purchase requisition & item & already deleted     W
    Scheduled quantity & & greater than target quantity & &     W
    Quantity smaller than invoiced quantity &     W
    Target quantity exceeded by  & &     W
    Not possible to determine a consumption account     W
    Release date lies in the past     W
    Base unit of measure & adopted from material master record
    Release date: next workday is &     W
    Contract target value & reached     W
    Please only use plants with company code &
    Order unit copied from material master record     W
    Hope it helps.
    Utsav..

  • Error While Cancelling Invoice

    Dear Experts,
    While trying to cancel a commercial invoice through transaction VF11 we are getting the short dump with mesage "ASSERTION_FAILED" (The ASSERT condition was  violated).
    Can someone give suggestions/reasons as to why we are getting this dump and how we can avoid it?
    Thanks..
    Bhavin

    Hello Bhavin,
    The reason for the short dump your facing while processing the
    transaction VF11 is that the General Ledger View for your document is
    missing. As you have New GL active in your system at the moment the
    return billing transaction expects the general ledger view in form of
    entries in the table FAGLFLEXA, which are missing.
    That's why the assertion dump is occurring.
    I assume that the New GL functionality has been activated subsequently
    in your system. Therefore the general ledger view has not been generated
    for the documents which were posted before the date it was activated.
    Among other also the above mentioned document. You can see that there
    are entries in the FAGLFLEXA only before this date.
    Please consider that it is not possible to activate the NEW GL
    functionality subsequently in the middle of the fiscal year after
    posting have been made (see note 891144 for further detail). In order to
    make sure that the New GL can used and to generate the general ledger
    view for the already posted documents a migration process is needed. The
    migration normally a very complex and extensive process which has to
    licensed by SAP and it is not yet released for customers.
    To correct this please run RGURECGLFLEX report in test mode
    for only this document firstly and to see whether this could create the
    document in the NewGL tables. If yes, run it in update mode and it should
    solve the issue while reversing.
    Please note that this will also update the balance of the accounts
    which are involved in the document accordingly for the respective
    periods in the documents accounts.
    Also please check if note 1023573  is applicable to your system.
    Regards,
    Alex

Maybe you are looking for