Issue With Similar Search Strings in EBS

Hi Everybody, I'm experiencing some issue regarding a Search String that I have, the config is very similar, the only difference between one and the other is that there's a specific posting rule for one particular account.
EG: Search String 1: (^)ACCOUNT TRANSFER TRSF TO( |$)
Search String 2:(^)ACCOUNT TRANSFER TRSF TO 1111111111( |$)
(Where 1111111111 is the bank account)
Same Extenral transaction, NTRF, Same house bank and account id. Same Comapny also
But when executing a Statement with the 1st one it works fine, but when runing the 2nd one it does not use any of them(it takes the Posting rule set for NTRF in the EBS configuration).
I've tested it in the SS test and it takes the right posting rule.
If you have any clue on this I'll really appreciate it.
Regards
Luciano

I apologize for the above and the thread has been posted here as I was unable to access the correct category due to some technical issues with Oracle forums. Also, the mentioned issue is in critical state and has a deadline so thought of posting to get it resolved as soon as possible. Specific categorization will be surely taken care in future.
Moving the thread to below location:
http://myforums.oracle.com/jive3/thread.jspa?threadID=1023776
Edited by: 931435 on Jun 6, 2012 12:25 AM

Similar Messages

Define Search String for EBS in SAP 4.6c

Hi All,
I have some question for search string for EBS in SAP 4.6c. I have already done this thing in ECC 6 and work well with "target field" as account number. but in 4.6c target field account number doesn't exist. Please suggest me, if there is a same way like account number target field in 4.6c?
Thanks in advance
Glenn

Hi Shanumonu,
Thx for the answer, you save my life!
But I have another issued. I already implement SE11 instruction, but item with wrong note to payee number from MT940 keep cleared. Do you have suggestion for me?
Thanks,
Glenn

Failing Search String in EBS through IDOC

Dear All,
we upload our EBS through idoc processing of type finsta. The problem is that for a particular bank theres a search string attached which will replace the posting rule if a certain but fix narration (say "Trf 66852") is received in note to payee field apart from the fixed external transaction code. The problem is that, in the idoc segment, though i am putting the same fixed narration as Trf66852 however the posting rule is not replacing. I am not able to determine even if the search string is working. I tried checking in EBSTS but apart from two blank lines nothing much is appearing. If anyone ever come across this issue pls share your experience.
best regds
Subha

Hi Subha,
The Notes to payee updates from FINSTA IDoc should work.
1. If you want to know if the configured search string is working or not, you can simulate it in OTPM, where the search strings are defined in the search string definition > Simulation. You need to entry the text from bank in Simulation and click on test.
2. Secondly, you can check in table FEBRE where the notes to Payee fields are updated.
Regards,
Kavita

Issue with flipping of strings in jsff page

We are facing the following issue with strings of type A:B in Arabic language.
In the UI, all A:B strings are supposed to be shown as B:A in Arabic, where A is a TOKEN value and B is a TRANSLATABLE STRING. But this is not happening in the UI.
So a String that is shown as ORG4-V1:Segment Values in English,we expect it to be shown as Segment Values : ORG4-V1 in Arabic, but it is displayed as ORG4-V1:Segment Values in Arabic also.
Following expression is used for displaying the string :
<af:showDetailHeader text="#{bindings.ValStructureCode}#{(bindings.ValStructureCode.inputValue==null) ? null:':'{CstCoreSetupGenBundle['Header.CostingAttributes']}"
This is shown as ASSET Default: Costing Attributes in the UI while it should be Costing Attributes : Asset Default (Here 'Asset Default' is the ValStructureCode)
For further details please refer to bug#11934853

I apologize for the above and the thread has been posted here as I was unable to access the correct category due to some technical issues with Oracle forums. Also, the mentioned issue is in critical state and has a deadline so thought of posting to get it resolved as soon as possible. Specific categorization will be surely taken care in future.
Moving the thread to below location:
http://myforums.oracle.com/jive3/thread.jspa?threadID=1023776
Edited by: 931435 on Jun 6, 2012 12:25 AM

Default.def with two search strings

Does anyone know if it's possible to use two search strings on single line in default.def?
What I'm trying to do is something like this:
001 999 "search string1 AND seach string2" "^job1 .... "
If both search strings are found in the data then output server would use ^job1

A quick and dirty regexp solution will take care of most of it:public static void main(String[] args) {
      if (args.length == 0){
         System.out.println("Please enter values separated by a space.");
         return;
      String group = "(?:";
      for (int i = 0; i< args.length; i++){
         if (i > 0) group += "|";
         group += args;
group += ")";
String[] vals = { "[email protected]#0931282583N/A1",
"[email protected]#0931282589Technical1",
"[email protected]#0935552223N/A2",
"[email protected]#1234657895Hello3",
"[email protected]#2225558591N4"};
System.out.println("Matching for group " + group);
for (int i=0; i< vals.length; i++){
if (vals[i].matches(".*" + group + "$") ){
System.out.println(vals[i]);
}With a proper regular expression, you don't care what the user types, so long as it is valid character data. The above expression will attempt to find the entered values at the end of each line.

Define Search String for EBS

Has anyone ever used target field EBFK0A1 BDC Account Type successfully? If so, can you please explain the basic settings?
We want to influence changing the G/L account number for posting area 1, line item 1. Any specific examples would be very helpful. We wish to avoid the creation of a new posting rule for each G/L account.
Regards,
Sandy

When creating search strings, I use both the mapping and the target field - the mapping is the value that is assigned to the target field. Take my ACH RETURN example from my previous post. The text ACH RETURN comes through in the note to payee and I use that to change the posting rule to posting rule Z120.
I set up a search string with search string value "ACH RETURN" and the following mapping:
A->Z
C->1
H->2
space->0
R->blank
E->blank
T->blank
U->blank
R->blank
N->blank
Then in the search string usage, I assigned the search string to target field "Posting Rule".
When the BAI file is loaded, if SAP finds "ACH RETURN" in the note to payee, it maps that value to Z120 and then assigns Z120 to the Posting Rule. Make sense?
No, we do not have any cross-company transactions coming through in our BAI files.
We do not have any cases where one transaction in the BAI file offsets transactions in multiple GL accounts. We do have situations where one transaction in the BAI file offsets multiple transactions in one GL account. For most of those cases, I'm using interpretation algorithm 121 (Reference document number search without test read) and using a search string to extract the reference number from the note to payee that matches to the reference number on the documents.
We do, however, have a scenario where we use a user exit to select multiple transactions from a GL account to clear against one transaction from the bank statement. The user exit is ZXF01U01 (Enhancement FEB00001, Function Module EXIT_RFEBBU10_001). We have logic in the user exit to find the line items to clear and populate those line items in table T_FEBCL. SAP then uses T_FEBCL to post the BAI transaction. If your user can come up rules for clearing the transactions from the multiple GL accounts, you might be able to use this user exit to accomplish the clearing.
If the user cannot come up with rules that you can program, then I would suggest a process change. Either the postings need to be originally made as one posting to one account. Or once the multiple items are posted, they need to be manually cleared into one account/one posting prior to the BAI file being loaded. Or you leave the process of posting to multiple GL accounts as is and the user has to clear the postings manually via post-processing (FEBA/FEBAN).
Hope this helps!
Regards,
Shannon
Edited by: Shannon Moberg on Jun 16, 2010 9:55 AM

Need help on search string in EBS

Hi,
We have a situation where multiple BAI transactions comes with same code, ex: 451 and based on the text in the note to payee they need to be posted to different clearing accounts.
I did config taking advantage of search string and posting rule in tareget field (EBVGINT)
For some reason getting an error message saying " Account symbol in account assignment not replaceable"
For example of CITI in the note to payee, my config is like this :
Created Account symbol CITI, Assigned GL account to account symbol CITI and account modifier as CITI too
Created posting key as CITI and posting rules are posting rule CITI , 40 (debit) post to bank accounting (option 1) for account symbol CITI and 50 (credit) post to bank as account symbol with posting to bank accounting (option 1) document type SA.
In the search string section, created a search string CITI with source (text from note to payee) and target as CITI (posting rule key)
then this searchs tring has been assigned to the company code, house bank, no algorithm, target field as posting rule and no prefix.
Can anybody explain me why i am getting the above error message based on this config ??
Thanks in advance
uma

Hi Uma,
The search string works this way:
Step 1: You define a search string. The search string should be a unique word or number or a combination which appears in the 88 record of the BAI statement. In the definition:
a. you give a name for the search string
b. a definition or long text
c. the search string - the unique word you want the system to search for in the 88 record. Please note that the search string you enter here should appear exactly in the same way in your bank statement.
d. you map this search string to a Posting rule or cost center or whatever you want to replace in the next step.
Step 2. Here you tell the system how this mapped information (in (d) above) is to be used. The mapped information could be used as a posting rule, as cost center, as profit center or in any way you want if you define your own logic.
The usage could be specific to a House bank, Account ID, Company code, BAI code combination or you can leave it as generic so that it will be used for all House Bank and Account ID in all company code.
But I would advise you to keep it very specific otherwise the results would not be what you want to be.
To answer your question: Also, do i need to add the entries in transaction type and assign them to the external transaction and posting rule ?
It is not required. But if you have assigned a posting rule under the Transaction type, the configuration in search string will override it. So you really don't need the assignment of posting rule under transaction type, but I would advise you to do it because if the system does not find your search string, then it will take this assignment as default.
Hope I made myself clear.
Kalyan

Issue with Google search on Safari

Hello: I am having the same issue with my iPad and iPhone 6. I think it may be related to iOS 8. when I was running iOS 7 whenever I would search for something in the Google search bar with and Safari the search bar would start to get suggestions what I may be searching for. For example if I would type in IT it would suggest that I was searching for the word Italy. Ever since I up dated to iOS 8 the suggest feature no longer works. I was wondering if this is an Apple issue and they will resolve it in a future iOS update or is there a problem with my settings. FYI in my Safari settings the default search is set to Google.
Thank you.

I have been having this same issue since the upgrade, and I cannot seem to fix it. I have restored, but iTunes won't let me revert back to pre 8.0/2.
Have not found any kind of resolution to this problem, and it doesn't seem to be a wide issue, as this is the only post I have seen on it.
Really annoying.

Issue with Formatted Search and Sales BOM

Good afternoon,
One of our customers uses a Formatted Search on the Sales Order row to lookup the Project Code stored against the Item.
This works very well, except for when a Sales BOM is selected. I assume the FS lookup is working correctly, but the screen is quickly refreshed to list all the component items related to the BOM. This process appears to overwrite the contents of the Project field.
We wish to keep this functionality, but retain the FS lookup results in the Project column. Could the order of the process be changed so that the BOM refresh occurs prior to the FS lookup.
Thanks
Greig
Edited by: Greig Burrows on Jul 21, 2010 5:57 PM

Hi,
For metadata, which metadata are you not seeing? Are they custom properties within the PDF, and have you checked if you have crawled properties matching these?
I know there's issue with last modified on PDF's (http://sharepointfieldnotes.blogspot.no/2013/05/understanding-and-getting-sharepoint.html)
Thanks,
Mikael Svenson
Search Enthusiast - SharePoint MVP/MCT/MCPD - If you find an answer useful, please up-vote it.
http://techmikael.blogspot.com/
Author of Working with FAST Search Server 2010 for SharePoint

HTTP probe issue with expect regex string

Hello,
We have a simple cgi status page setup to poll a background service and return a "PASS" or "FAIL" as output. I've setup an HTTP probe to look for the "PASS" to determine application health. The issue appears to be that the expect regex is searching the HEADER but not the BODY of the web page. I can successfully match on any string in the header, but never on anything in the body.
Here is what the web page returns if you telnet to it:
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 22:45:07 GMT
Server: Apache/2.0.59 HP-UX_Apache-based_Web_Server (Unix) DAV/2
Content-Length: 4
Connection: close
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
PASS
Here is my probe:
probe http JOE-TEST-CS
interval 45
passdetect interval 30
receive 30
request method get url /cgi-bin/ERMS-PREP-statusRepo.cgi
expect status 0 999
open 20
expect regex "PASS"
Here is the output of the show probe:
ACE1/euhr-test-ace2# sh probe JOE-TEST-CS detail
probe       : JOE-TEST-CS
type        : HTTP
state       : ACTIVE
description :
   port      : 80      address     : 0.0.0.0         addr type : -
   interval : 45      pass intvl : 30              pass count : 3
   fail count: 3       recv timeout: 30
   http method      : GET
   http url         : /cgi-bin/ERMS-PREP-statusRepo.cgi
   conn termination : GRACEFUL
   expect offset    : 0         , open timeout     : 20
   expect regex     : PASS
   send data        : -
                       --------------------- probe results --------------------
   probe association   probed-address probes     failed     passed     health
   ------------------- ---------------+----------+----------+----------+-------
   serverfarm : JOE-TEST-PROBE-CS
     real      : EUHRTDM50.APP[0]
                       192.168.73.71   2          2          0          FAILED
   Socket state        : CLOSED
   No. Passed states   : 0         No. Failed states : 1
   No. Probes skipped : 0         Last status code : 200
   No. Out of Sockets : 0         No. Internal error: 0
   Last disconnect err : User defined Reg-Exp was not found in Host Response
Last probe time     : Thu Sep 22 15:00:36 2011
   Last fail time      : Thu Sep 22 15:00:36 2011
   Last active time    : Thu Sep 22 09:40:19 2011
If I replace the expect regex "PASS" with anything from the HEADER it succeeds!
Any thoughts?

Sorry, I missed it. The content-length in your request is 4. I think this may be the issue. I created a basic HTML page that says PASS in the body and my server is returning a content-length of 224 when I fetch the page. Here is my HTML request:
GET /index.html
http-equiv="Content-Type">
Probe
PASS
Here are my headers that I received:
(Status-Line)    HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Content-Length    224
Content-Type    text/html
Last-Modified    Tue, 27 Sep 2011 12:05:00 GMT
Accept-Ranges    bytes
Etag    "8cca60aed7dcc1:41f"
Server    Microsoft-IIS/6.0
Date    Tue, 27 Sep 2011 12:25:59 GMT
What version of code are you running on your ACE? I can also look to see if there are any known issues.
Kris

Issues with PRC search

I'm having all kinds of fun with the PRC search API and I'm wondering if anyone else has experienced any of these issues. These two are the current thorns in my side:
1) IPortalSearchResult.getIconURL returns an incorrect image URL. My server (tomcat) is on http://bdg-solaris2:8080/portal/server.pt and my images (apache httpd) are on http://bdg-solaris2:8888/imageserver. Here's a sample URL coming back from getIconURL:
http://bdg-solaris2:8080/imageserver/plumtree/portal/public/img/icon_user.gif
It has the wrong port. Why?
2) IPortalSearchResult.getURL returns an empty string. Why? My current search is on users -- wouldn't it be appropriate to return the opener URL for the URL object or do I need to construct this myself?
Geez.
Chris Bucchere | bdg | [email protected] | http://www.bdg-online.com

Hi, Chris -
Yeah... I tell ya, I saw something like this and I kinda just bypassed it
1) Instead of using the getIconURL I just popped the output into an adaptive tag on the way out to draw the property. I do have a snippet of PRC search code at work that used this - I'll have to check when I get into the office. When I saw this it was goofier than your example - it was getting confused and mangling the URL for me in a different way. I chalked it up to my noobness at that point and didn't have time to mess with it. I'm curius - that config setting is contained somewhere and sent to the remote tier - I'll bet it's confused somewhere on the portal or WS API tier and passing this along. If you check the WS API logs, does it show what it "thinks" the right imageserver URL is?
2) Ditto-ish on this. I avoided the getURL altogether and just used the common opener link tag. I figured I had the object and class Ids, so... I just fed them into the tag.
I know that doesn't answer your question pe se, but maybe it's another option?
Thanks,
Eric

SSRS 2012 - Windows Server 2012 R2 issue with OLEDB Connection String

Hoping someone can help. As stated above, we are running SQL Server 2012 with SP1 on Windows Server 2012 R2. When I create a Data Source as follows in Reporting Services, I receive the following error message. Any thoughts on why this fails? The same data
source works on Windows Server 2008 R2 Enterprise SQL Server 2008 R2.
Data Source type: OLE DB
Connection string: Provider=Microsoft.ACE.OLEDB.12.0;Data Source="\\networknamehere\CSVFiles";Mode=Read;Extended Properties="text;HDR=YES;FMT=CSVDelimited"
ERROR: Throwing Microsoft.ReportingServices.ReportProcessing.ReportProcessingException: , Microsoft.ReportingServices.ReportProcessing.ReportProcessingException: Cannot create a connection to data source 'CSV_Datasource'. ---> System.Data.OleDb.OleDbException:
Unspecified error
at System.Data.OleDb.OleDbConnectionInternal..ctor(OleDbConnectionString constr, OleDbConnection connection)
at System.Data.OleDb.OleDbConnectionFactory.CreateConnection(DbConnectionOptions options, Object poolGroupProviderInfo, DbConnectionPool pool, DbConnection owningObject)
at System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionFactory.CreateNonPooledConnection(DbConnection owningConnection, DbConnectionPoolGroup poolGroup)
at System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionFactory.GetConnection(DbConnection owningConnection)
at System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionClosed.OpenConnection(DbConnection outerConnection, DbConnectionFactory connectionFactory)
at System.Data.OleDb.OleDbConnection.Open()
at Microsoft.ReportingServices.DataExtensions.ConnectionExtension.Open()
at Microsoft.ReportingServices.Diagnostics.DataExtensionConnectionBase.OpenConnection(IProcessingDataSource dataSourceObj, DataSourceInfo dataSourceInfo, IDbConnection conn)
--- End of inner exception stack trace ---;

Hi ABAA101,
According to your description, when you use csv file as data source in SSRS 2012 report, you got the error message.
I tested the issue in my local machine, due to some policy restrictions, I could not install Access in my local machine. To workaround the issue, we can use the connection string like below:
Provider=Microsoft.Jet.OLEDB.4.0;Data Source=C:\\report;
Extended Properties="text;HDR=Yes;FMT=Delimited"
The csv file is stored in report folder in C driver.
In Query text box in the dataset, we can use the query like below:
Select * from new.csv
If you have any more questions, please feel free to ask.
Thanks,
Wendy Fu
Wendy Fu
TechNet Community Support

Design issue with similar machines, but different Globals

Hi,
I know my questions about Global Variables has been up before, but maybe not in this kind of issue. The original coding has been done by someone else than me, but i want to change it. Now every machine has a folder and each folder consist of similar information as the next one. So there are 4 duplicate of every control and it's a nightmare to update the global variables in the total of around 200 files. I would like to combine the files so that only 1 file for "every action" would exist. So how should i do it. I have a few ideas but i would like to know how "the professionals" would do it.
I've read that you should avoid of using a lot of Global Variables, but i don't know if in my case i can avoid them. Some of them could be removed when it's a realtime test that's going on and during the test you can open the attached VI, so how other could you transfer the information?
System consist of:
4 hardware test machines
22 FP devices reading and writing
~50 Global Variables / per machine (50 variables per file, 1 file per machine)
The attachments contines of one of the VIs that i'm working on. I'm not sure if you can open it because it contains many subVIs, but you get the picture of what i'm working with. So any ideas how to combine 4 same VIs with different Global Variables?
Attachments:
2.png ‏35 KB
Temperature meas_1.vi ‏331 KB
1.png ‏40 KB

Hi Englund,
you feed the cluster through the vi like your error cluster. In the subvi's you only unbundle/bundle the values you need!
Example (Pretty silly, as the 'Select' operation isn't needed at all - I have to kill a student for that ) :
The cluster 'Messvorschrift' contains about 50 values (partly in sub-clusters or arrays). You get the value needed for operation and write it back when needed.
This scheme is pretty straightforward - but has a problem: it leeds to race conditions when you access your global several times in parallel!
Then you should use a LV2-style global aka 'Action engine' - look for the last community nuggets in the forum!
Message Edited by GerdW on 05-22-2007 09:22 AM
Best regards,
GerdW
CLAD, using 2009SP1 + LV2011SP1 + LV2014SP1 on WinXP+Win7+cRIO
Kudos are welcome
Attachments:
Cluster.png ‏2 KB

Issue with custom search fields in agent inbox

Hi All,
I am working on CRM agent inbox 7.0. The issue I am facing is like this:
I have added custom search fields in inbox. When give a combination of standard search field and custom search field, the result is only based on standard field. The value of custom field is not considered.
Is this a standard behaviour? Are standard fields given higher priority that custom fields?
Any pointers on this would be highly helpful.
Thanks,
Narendra

Hi Naren,
Did you add custom field using AET? If yes then while adding custom field using AET did you make it search and result relevant?
There is nothing like priority in standard SAP fields and custom fields.
Please let me know so that I can further help you.
Thanks,
Bhushan

[solved]Possible issue with forum search

This thread does not show up in a search for "xfce" in "Topic subject only".
Edit: apparently, all searches are "described" the same way, so nevermind the rest.
Also, the description for the search is
Topics with posts containing 'xfce'
which seems like a poor description for a search in "Topic subject only".
Topics containing 'xfce'
would be much more appropriate I think.
Last edited by alphaniner (2012-04-30 18:45:25)

alphaniner wrote:
There's a particular cruelty in Arch having a broken forum search function, as often as people are admonished for not STFF.
If the function is known to be bugged, wouldn't it be responsible to point that out somewhere, if not remove it entirely?
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Main_Page tels you that you can use Google search too. Such a note for the forum would be nice.

Issue With Similar Search Strings in EBS

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for