JDeveloper 10g & ADF BC:Unexpected behavior on activation within AM

Question

I have overwritten the passivateState/activateState within my root am. The DOM printout is correct after the passivation but upon activation, the nodes seem to be concatenated together. I'm perplexed on how this is happening, anyone run into this?
This is what I'm trying to passivate (visually). Which works as intended.
-MYMAP
---KEY0
------CHILD_NODE_0
------CHILD_NODE_1
---KEY1
------CHILD_NODE_0
------CHILD_NODE_1
This is what I get upon activation
-MYMAP
---KEY0
------CHILD_NODE_0CHILD_NODE_1
---KEY1
------CHILD_NODE_0CHILD_NODE_1
here is my code and printout:
private void printMapWithChildNode(Node mapNode) {
NodeList nl = mapNode.getChildNodes();
for (int i = 0; i < nl.getLength(); i++) {
Node node = nl.item(i);
for(int j=0; j<node.getChildNodes().getLength(); j++){
System.out.println("i: " + i + "key: " + node.getNodeName() +
" value: " +
node.getChildNodes().item(j).getNodeValue() +" on j: "+j);
private void passivateMenuItemMap(Document doc, Element parent, Map map, String NODE_KEY_NAME){
if (map != null) {
Node mapNode = doc.createElement(NODE_KEY_NAME);
for (Iterator keys = map.keySet().iterator(); keys.hasNext();) {
String key = (String)keys.next();
Node keyNode = doc.createElement(key); // KEY0,KEY1, ETC...
ModuleNameAndPatientCheck mnpc =(ModuleNameAndPatientCheck) map.get(key);
Node childNode1 = doc.createTextNode("CHILD_NODE_0");
Node childNode2 = doc.createTextNode("CHILD_NODE_1");
keyNode.appendChild(childNode1);
keyNode.appendChild(childNode2);
mapNode.appendChild(keyNode);
parent.appendChild(mapNode);
printMapWithChildNode(mapNode);
PRINT OUT:
10/11/30 10:49:04 i: 0 key: KEY0 value: CHILD_NODE_0 on j: 0
10/11/30 10:49:04 i: 0 key: KEY0 value: CHILD_NODE_1 on j: 1
10/11/30 10:49:04 i: 1 key: KEY1 value: CHILD_NODE_0 on j: 0
10/11/30 10:49:04 i: 1 key: KEY1 value: CHILD_NODE_1 on j: 1
public void activateMenuItemMap(Element elem, Map map, String NODE_KEY_NAME) {
if (elem != null) {
NodeList nl = elem.getElementsByTagName(NODE_KEY_NAME);
if (nl != null && nl.item(0)!=null) {
printMapWithChildNode(nl.item(0));
PRINT OUT:
10/11/30 10:49:04 i: 0 key: KEY0 value: CHILD_NODE_0CHILD_NODE_1 on j: 0
10/11/30 10:49:04 i: 1 key: KEY1 value: CHILD_NODE_0CHILD_NODE_1 on j: 1
...

Answer 1

Got word from metalink that this is bug 9220124. There are no official fixes for either 10g or 11g at this point. I ended up creating extra nodes to get the code to work.