Labview fundamenta​ls test question

Hi,
I have attached a question from LV fundamentals test. Can't figure out the reasoning if the answer should  be A or B. Any help appreciated?
Thanks,
ABM 
Solved!
Go to Solution.
Attachments:
fundamental Q_8.doc ‏109 KB

Nono.  The answer is B.  The option A is incorrect. 
Keep in mind that there are 25 points on graph.  If the answer is A, there must be at least at one point with a value greater than 5 on the graph, since the possible outcome range from 0-10.  The probabilty of getting a 6, 7, 8, 9, aor 10 is 5/11.  That is a probability of about 50%.   
In another word, you have a about 50% chance to get a value in the range of 6-10 for each point and you have 25 points.  It is impossible to not get any values between 6-10 on a graph with 25 points. 
If you flip a coin 10 times, is it possible to not get a tail?  We can think about it this way.
Yik
Kudos and Accepted as Solution are welcome!

Similar Messages

  • Fundamenta​l test question

    How does this even work? (see atachment) How do you know what the feed back loop is initialized to? I built this VI and put probes on it. The output of the FB is always zero. This is what I can tell , the index is saying to start insert at the second element in the array. The I terminal is element to insert (0,1,2) for the 3 itterations.  The out put of the FB is the array to insert into.
    What am I missing?
    Alan
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.
    Attachments:
    9-15-2009 6-21-54 AM.jpg ‏55 KB

    The answer is going to be D.
    The array is initialized to
    [1 8 6 2]
    This is done by passing the array to the blue dot on the left side of the for loop.
    Iteration 0
    [1 0 8 6 2]
    Iteration 1
    [1 1 0 8 6 2]
    Iteration 2
    [1 2 1 0 8 6 2]
    So you are left with choice D
    Message Edited by Cory K on 09-15-2009 11:18 AM
    Cory K

  • Test questions for cerfitication on SBO2007

    Hi all,
    i am a sbo consultant and have about 2 years experience.  I am currently studying the E-learning curriculum with view to the get the certification as a SBO 2007 implementation consultant.  There are some self-test questions available with the curriculum, but it would be better if there were more. 
    any info on how get more test exam questions would be greatly appreciated.
    best regards,
    michael

    Hi,
    Please go through the first book and third book ( ie. Logistics  & Implementation ) . Why i am saying is you have some direct questions. when you go into the accounts book there wont be direct question. all the questions are based on business scenario.
    But my advice is to get learn all have knowledge in all the books, do the test well my best wishes to get success for you online examination.
    Regards
    Chidambaram

  • Random test questions quiz results not working

    I have a project with random test questions. It's published in HTML5...Each time I play the project in preview, the test results are accurate and correct at the end...However after I have published the project to my site, all the random test questions are NOT accurately scored in at the end of the quiz...It's tells me basically I got all the questions wrong, when in fact the on each questions my display is clearly stating it's correct.
    If I move the question out of the random test questions and back into the main project...it is scored correctly, but once it's back in the "pools" area, it is scored incorrectly in the final tally as a random test question...Don't have a clue why this is...it's really been time consuming trying to fix it...and my fortune so far fixing anything to do with Captivate is really low! Buggy! I'm using Captivate 8, so have no idea...
    Anyone have any idea what is going on?

    So obvious I don't know why I didn't think of that. LOL
    Many thanks that works.
    It would appear that the only way to adjust the pause is to add time to the
    slide as I am unable to slide the pause back.  But changing the slide of 3
    secs to 3.1 does work.
    Is there an easy way to do this for ALL slides or do I just have to  do it
    one by one.
    Again many thanks
    Andy
    Jeddah by the sea, Saudi Arabia.

  • LabVIEW Embedded - Performance Testing - Different Platforms

    Hi all,
    I've done some performance testing of LabVIEW on various microcontroller development boards (LabVIEW Embedded for ARM) as well as on a cRIO 9122 Real-time Controller (LabVIEW Real-time) and a Dell Optiplex 790 (LabVIEW desktop). You may find the results interesting. The full report is attached and the final page of the report is reproduced below.
    Test Summary
    µC MIPS
    Single Loop
    Effective MIPS
    Single Loop
    Efficiency
    Dual Loop
    Effective MIPS
    Dual Loop
    Efficiency
    MCB2300
      65
        31.8
    49%
          4.1
      6%
    LM3S8962
      60
        50.0
    83%
          9.5
    16%
    LPC1788
      120
        80.9
    56%
        12.0
      8%
    cRIO 9122
      760
      152.4
    20%
      223.0
    29%
    Optiplex 790
    6114
    5533.7
    91%
    5655.0
    92%
    Analysis
    For microcontrollers, single loop programming can retain almost 100% of the processing power. Such programming would require that all I/O is non-blocking as well as use of interrupts. Multiple loop programming is not recommended, except for simple applications running at loop rates less than 200 Hz, since the vast majority of the processing power is taken by LabVIEW/OS overhead.
    For cRIO, there is much more processing power available, however approximately 70 to 80% of it is lost to LabVIEW/OS overhead. The end result is that what can be achieved is limiting.
    For the Desktop, we get the best of both worlds; extraordinary processing power and high efficiency.
    Speculation on why LabVIEW Embedded for ARM and LabVIEW Real-time performance is so poor puts the blame on excessive context switch. Each context switch typically takes 150 to 200 machine cycles and these appear to be inserted for each loop iteration. This means that tight loops (fast with not much computation) consume enormous amounts of processing power. If this is the case, an option to force a context switch every Nth loop iteration would be useful.
    Conclusion
    LabVIEW Embedded
    for ARM
    LabVIEW Real-time for cRIO/sbRIO
    LabVIEW Desktop for Windows
    Development Environment Cost
    High
    Reasonable
    Reasonable
    Execution Platform Cost
    Very low
    Very High / High
    Low
    Processing Power
    Low (current Tier 1)
    Medium
    Enormous
    LabVIEW/OS efficiency
    Low
    Low
    High
    OEM friendly
    Yes+
    No
    Yes
    LabVIEW Desktop has many attractive features. This explain why LabVIEW Desktop is so successful and is the vast majority of National Instruments’ software sales (and consequently results in the vast majority of hardware sales). It is National Instruments’ flagship product and is the precursor to the other LabVIEW offerings. The execution platform is powerful, available in various form factors from various sources and is competitively priced.
    LabVIEW Real-time on a cRIO/sb-RIO is a lot less attractive. To make this platform attractive the execution platform cost needs to be vastly decreased while increasing the raw processing power. It would also be beneficial to examine why the LabVIEW/OS overhead is so high. A single plug-in board no larger than 75 x 50 mm (3” x 2”) with a single unit price under $180 would certainly make the sb-RIO a viable execution platform. The peripheral connectors would not be part of the board and would be accessible via a connector. A developer mother board could house the various connectors, but these are not needed when incorporated into the final product. The recently released Xilinx Zynq would be a great chip to use ($15 in volume, 2 x ARM Cortex A9 at 800 MHz (4,000 MIPS), FPGA fabric and lots more).
    LabVIEW Embedded for ARM is very OEM friendly with development boards that are open source with circuit diagrams available. To make this platform attractive, new more capable Tier 1 boards will need to be introduced, mainly to counter the large LabVIEW/OS overhead. As before, these target boards would come from microcontroller manufacturers, thereby making them inexpensive and open source. It would also be beneficial to examine why the LabVIEW/OS overhead is so high. What is required now is another Tier 1 boards (eg. DK-LM3S9D96 (ARM Cortex M3 80 MHz/96 MIPS)). Further Tier 1 boards should be targeted every two years (eg. BeagleBoard-xM (ARM Cortex A8 1000 MHz/2000 MIPS board)) to keep LabVIEW Embedded for ARM relevant.
    Attachments:
    LabVIEW Embedded - Performance Testing - Different Platforms.pdf ‏307 KB

    I've got to say though, it would really be good if NI could further develop the ARM embedded toolkit.
    In the industry I'm in, and probably many others, control algorithm development and testing oocurs in labview. If you have a good LV developer or team, you'll end up with fairly solid, stable and tested code. But what happens now, once the concept is validated, is that all this is thrown away and the C programmers create the embedded code that will go into the real product.
    The development cycle starts from scratch. 
    It would be amazing if you could strip down that code and deploy it onto ARM and expect it to not be too inefficient. Development costs and time to market go way down.. BUT, but especially in the industry I presently work in, the final product's COST is extremely important. (These being consumer products, chaper micro cheaper product) . 
    These concerns weight HEAVILY. I didn't get a warm fuzzy about the ARM toolkit for my application. I'm sure it's got its niches, but just imagine what could happen if some more work went into it to make it truly appealing to wider market...

  • Can we send pre-test score (Pre-test question slide) and post test score (Question slide) both in lms from captivate?

    can we send pre-test score (Pre-test question slide) and post test score (Question slide) both in lms from captivate?

    Pretest score normally is not sent to the LMS. However it is stored in a system variable, you could use JS to send it.

  • VSTS load test QUESTION : While recording the webPerformanceTest, is it is possible to clear / force to clear cachewithout stopping or closing the IE on recorder?

    VSTS load test QUESTION : While recording the webPerformanceTest, is it is possible to clear / force to clear cache without stopping or closing the IE on recorder?
    I am facing issue, while recording the webtest, our application first time loading any screen calls some requests and 2nd time when browsed the same information if it is available at cache then it will not
    call the requests again.
    How can i force the VSTS to clear cache while recording, so that i can record those requests which gets called at the first time.
    Regards
    SatishK

    Hi SatishK,
    Thanks for your reply.
    >>but my question was while recording (During recording using web test recorder) i want to clear cache.
    Based on your issue,
     I did some research about it,
    but I still find the official document about it. Generally, I know that if we want to clear the web performance test by the
    Cashe Control properties, so I think that it is not possible to clear the cashes when we are recording the web performance.
    If you still want to this feature for web performance test, I suggest you could submit this feature request:
    http://visualstudio.uservoice.com/forums/121579-visual-studio. The Visual Studio product team is listening to user voice there. You
    can send your idea there and people can vote. If you submit this suggestion, I hope you could post that link here, I will help you vote it.
    Thanks for your understanding.
    Best Regards,
    We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
    Click
    HERE to participate the survey.

  • Setting a Conditional Action for Pre-Test questions: Skipping Content Slides

    OK boys and girls, let's see if this is even possible within one course SCO, or if this a multi-SCO solution (which means I'm toast, because we don't have the multi-SCO aggregator)?
    I want to set up a prescriptive pre-test. In my ideal world, answers to each individual question would either enable or disable the content slides connected to the question. If the user passes the pre-test, they could opt to skip the prescriptive stuff and complete the course. If the user fails the pretest, they would have to view the enabled content.
    Is this even possible in a single SCO world?
    Justenuf

    Jim belongs in that pantheon of good guys as well, so many here have pointed me in the right direction and helped me move forward with the capabilities of this software. And, in that spirit - here's my work around for the pretest/post test in a SCORM 1.2 environment:
    Created an entrance slide that allows opting totake the pretest or not - but only allows you to take it once.
    Created one test (take off the question x of x widget) split it and slide the content in between it. In this case, 10 questions with 5 in each set.
    Titled the first set of questions as a PreTest and the second set as a Post Test.
    Set my passing score at 4 correct. (the user only needs to get 4 out 5 on either set correct to pass - and I'm setting up an action that only allows the user to see the questions they missed if they fail the pretest.)
    Created variables for each "pretest" question and set them at 0. Created on Enter advanced actions on each slide following a question that toggled the variable to 1 if the question was answered correctly  if "CpQuizInfoLastSlidepointScored is equal to 1" then "Assign Question<x> with 1"
    Created an On Enter advanced action for each content area slide "Skip #" that allowed prescription:
    "If Question # is equal to 1 or cpQuizInfoPassFail is equal to 1, then Go to Next Slide"
    Only the content connected to the missed questions in the pretest is seen.
    Copied the same On Enter advanced action the Post test questions and renamed it "SkipPost #" that allowed prescription:
    "If Question # is equal to 1 or cpQuizInfoPassFail is equal to 1, then Go to Next Slide"
    Only the questions related to the reviewed content are seen
    The sum total of these activities is the following -
    The user can choose to take the pretest and complete the course by gettiong 4 or 5 questions correct and jump to the exit page.
         If the user takes the pretest and scores lower than 80%, the content for the missed questions is viewed and the user must answer the questions regarding
         that content. The user passes the course when he/she answers the fourth question correctly.
    The user can choose to view the content, take the post test and pass the course by answering 4 of 5 correctly.
    it's running right in preview, in web browser preview and on my LMS previewer, with one navigation error.
          the error: after failing the pretest, taking the prescribed content and anse wering the questions correctly, the course occasionally jumps to the results page
         and s displays a failure message, then freezes in place. it does NOT happen each time, which is why I am cy urrently scurrying back to my happy place to dwell
         on this mystery awhile.
    Justenuf

  • Global Object Access Auditing test question

    Hello!
    There's a test question (N4) I'd like to have clearified:
    http://exam.test4actual.com/70-411.pdf
    Yes, D and F will enable auditing with no extra replication traffic, but enabling Global Object Acces Auditing will lead to auditing not only SYSVOL shares but to any others as well (http://blogs.technet.com/b/askds/archive/2011/03/10/global-object-access-auditing-is-magic.aspx)
    - is this replication traffic worth it???
    Thank you in advance,
    Michael

    Hi,
    For this question, the correct answer is DF, but we do not need to use Global Object Acces Auditing policy to audit SYSVOL shares.
    About the replication traffic, please refer to:
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb742457.aspx
    Meanwhile, any changes made to SYSVOL are automatically replicated to the other domain controllers in the domain. If the files stored in SYSVOL change frequently, the replication increases the input and output for the volume where SYSVOL is located. For
    example, editing a GPO can potentially force a GPO-level replication. If the volume is also host to other system files, such as the directory database or the pagefile, then the increased input and output for the volume can impact the performance of the server.
    More detail information:
    Introduction to Administering SYSVOL
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc778037(v=WS.10).aspx
    Regards.

  • Where can I find test question for SCJP(CX-310-055)

    Dear professionals,
    As you know new exam Sun Certified Java Programmer, Standart Edition 5.0 is already available.
    http://www.sun.com/training/catalog/courses/CX-310-055.xml
    Also you can find study guide for this :
    http://java.boot.by/scjp-tiger/
    But this exam is pretty new(only several months) and I can't find any of test question for this exams like for previous one(http://www.danchisholm.net/latest.html for CX-310-035).
    Could you please send me some links with test question for the last exam(CX-310-055).
    Thank you

    <whisper> Be very very quiet. I think theres an avalanche about to happen</>

  • Interface labview with the test board to identify opamp pins automatically

    is it possible to interface LABVIEW to a test board in such a way that the input, output pins of an op amp (8, 10, 14, 16 pin opamps) are identified automatically when DUT is placed in the socket

    pratheek wrote:
    Thanks alot. pin numbers are variable. I need to test the functional and test parameters for 8, 10, 14, 16 pin opamps.
    The first thing you need to do is ensure that +VCC, -VCC, and GND are always connected to the correct pins.  I think the best way to do this is have preset wire options that you manually select with some switches (reduces the complexity of the LabVIEW controlled wire switching).
    pratheek wrote:
    The desired out put for my project is to check the functionality of the opamps
    I understand the end goal, but what you need for first specity is the test sequence.
    1. Identify In/Out pins & number of op-amps.  What is the sequence for this??? What voltages do you apply to the various pins and what is your desired outcome???  How do you identify each pin as in/out and whether they are for OpAmp1, OpAmp2, etc.  Since this sequence will inevitabely apply voltage to the output pins, make sure your test sequence doesn't damage the chips.
    2. After identfying each op-amp, what is the test sequence for evaluate its "functionality"??  Do you wish to evaluate the gain for various resistor combinations in an external circuit????
    3. Now with your test sequences outlined, you can finally begin on getting LabVIEW to implement these functions.  I'd use the DAQ digital outputs to a decoder (3-to-8 or 4-to-16).  Use the outputs of the decoder to control switches (these switches control the connections between a second DAQ and the test pins).  A third DAQ may even be necessary to control the selection of various test resistors.  Keep in mind that each of these switches will add resistance to the path so your evaluation must be made measuring the voltages at the op-amp pins (not using the sourced voltage values).  Planning the full measurement sequence and requirements before you start will not only help guide your program's development but it will tell you which DAQs are useful and how many you will need.
    This is quite an undertaking and we can't really provide any help on the LabVIEW end until you have a full write up of what you want to happen and how (step-by-step details).  Once you have that, start thinking about the sequence of events your code will have to follow to make it happen, then come back for guidance/help.

  • Test Question disagreement

    Hello, I have a disagreement about a java test question my teacher wrote and I was hoping someone here could clear it up once and for all. My instructor and I agree on just about everything except what "will be used with objects " means.
    for example (you can skip past the code, I'm sure most of you are familiar with the rules, lol):
    public class AnIntegerNamedX
    static private int x;
    static public int x()
    return x;
    static public void setX(int newX)
    x = newX;
    public static void main(String argv[])
    //example of a class method, working without creating an object
    AnIntegerNamedX.setX(1);
    System.out.println("AnIntegerNamedX.x = " + AnIntegerNamedX.x());
    //example of a class method being accessed from (used with) an object
    AnIntegerNamedX Bob = new AnIntegerNamedX();
    Bob.setX(2);
    System.out.println("AnIntegerNamedX.x = " + Bob.x());
    Bob is an object made from the AnIntegerNamedX class, and x() is a class method (as I'm sure you can see, but I have to write it down for my own sake)
    Bob.setX(2); works because class methods can "be used with objects".
    (in the book it says "class methods must be static" so I use the words class and static interchangeably)
    so, if static methods can be used with objects then this T/F question would be true:
    "class(static) methods that will be used with objects are usually static."
    Aren't all static methods usually static? I can understand how she interpreted it to be false, she feels that class methods can't "be used with objects" because they are static. However, I just gave what I think is a good example of using a static method with an object; or is using the term "using" like that wrong? I feel this really comes down to such a slight technicality that the question should be thrown out.
    I feel I answered the question correctly, just not how she intended. But because I'm not a mind reader, I didn't know what she intended, just what the question was and because the wording "be used with" is too vague it opened the question up to be miss-interpreted.
    what do you think? and please don't play the devils advocate, people seem to like doing that to me for some reason.
    Smashing

    The problem with OOP terminology is that it's looser than anybody wants to admit.
    An object can be related to its meta-object (i.e., its class) and call that meta-object's methods (i.e., static methods of the class that object is an instance of). So class methods can be used by objects. It's not quite clear if "used with objects" would have the same meaning or if the speaker would mean something else.
    I'd say that of course class methods can be used with objects, for example:
    public static String echo(String arg) {
        return arg;
    }See? It's a static method, and it's being used with its argument, which is an object. For that matter, each class is itself an instance of Class, which is a subclass of Object.
    This sentence:
    "class(static) methods that will be used with objects are usually static."I'd say is true, because static methods are always static (just blue things are blue), and thus they're also usually static. Now, I suppose you could say that it should be false because "usually" does not equal "always", but then the question is vague that way -- it depends on your definition of "is" -- does it mean equivalency or inclusion?
    I'd say your teacher is wrong, not because of the truth or falseness of these statements, but because she's trying to give hard true/false answers to questions that aren't specified very precisely. Also I'm wondering now if she's even aware that a class is an instance of Class which is a subclass of Object, or if she is aware why she didn't tell you (maybe she just wanted the argument to end).

  • Extra long lag with voice-over test questions

    Hello,
    I have recently been using voice over on my courses and the test for learners who may not be able to read. I have noticed when I use audio on a test question and choose the correct answer and click "submit" there is a long lag on the slide after clicking. It could be anywhere from 5-25 seconds of a lag between questions. I am at a loss on this and it only happens when I use audio.

    Hi Ryan,
    Maybe you are not aware of the fact that a question slide has a pausing point that is set by default at 1.5 secs. Look at the timeline: you'll see the pausing point as a vertical bar (not very visible on the blue timeline).
    The two-step process for submitting is happening at that pausing point. After the second step (Press Y or...) the playhead will Continue if you keep the default actions for Success and After Last Attempt, which will mean that you'll have to wait till it reaches the end of the slide. Due to your VO the slide will have increased much in duration, original duration was 3 secs, which meant a waiting time of 1.5 secs after the pause. Now you'll have a much longer waiting time.
    Two possible solutions:
    Drag the pausing point more towards the end of the question slide (there is no other way than dragging)
    Change the actions for Success and After Last Attempt to 'Go to Next Slide'. However sometimes this can cause an issue... depending on the deployment
    More info: http://blog.lilybiri.com/question-question-slides-in-captivate
    Lilybiri

  • Pre and Post test Questions

    I have a project that requires a pre-test, post-test and
    knowledge reviews throughout the course. I have created 10 question
    slides (I did not use question pools). I am having two issues occur
    within the course. First I do not want to track or score the
    pre-test questions or the questions embedded within the course what
    I will refer to as Knowledge reviews.
    I do want the user to go through and receive feedback on each
    question answered incorrectly but I do not want a score to be
    collected/tracked or tallied as part of the sum total for the
    course. The post-test questions need to be the only tracked/scored
    questions with that value being submitted to the LMS.
    Currently all the questions are being tallied in the course.
    (i.e test results show 30 questions with a score when there should
    only be 10). What is the best way to include mutiple questions
    within my course (as pre-test and Knowledge reviews) but not have a
    score tracked until the user takes a post test.
    To correct this should I change the pre-test and knowledge
    reviews to a survey type question? Or should I leave the question
    as graded but set the point value to 0. I inially left the pre-test
    and knowldge reviews as graded questions but I deselected Report
    Answers under the reporting tab thinking this would prevent the
    passing of a score, which is not the case.
    If anyone can offer some advice or point me to some
    documentaiton that discusses this I would greatly appreciate any
    help.
    The second issue I have is with the progress indicator within
    the course. Is there a way to revmove this from the quesiton pages.
    My client does not want to see this indicator. The current work
    around I am using is to reduce the font size of the indicator to
    5pt, setting the font color to match my background and then
    positioning the indicator in a set loation on the page. While this
    workaround works I would like to remove it in total if possible.
    Thanks in advance,

    The first part sounds very weird. I just made a project which
    included knowledge checks in the middle of the course and they are
    not tracked in the final test. I used Graded questions in my course
    and I initially set the score per question to 0 points. After I
    found out that they were counted in the question total I removed
    the reporting for each of the questions. Now the points are not
    being counted and also the questions are not being counted in the
    final assesment - I just have the 6 questions out of 6 in the
    post-test even though I have 4 knowledge checks inside the course
    it self.
    Try and click F9 to open up the advanced interaction panel
    and make sure that the answers are not being reported. I know it's
    obvious, but sometimes Captivate does some weird things.
    As for your second question regarding the progress indicator
    you can remove that by going to Quiz - Quiz Preferences - Settings
    and then unchecking the box "Show Progress".
    Best regards,
    Michael

  • HT1711 i wanted to buy music from itune, but when i log in, it said i should answer my email test question, and i have already forgoting it. please what can i do?

    i wanted to buy music from itune, but when i log in, it said i should answer my email test question, and i have already forgoting it. please what can i do?

    If you've forgotten the answers to your security questions and you have a rescue email address (which is not the same thing as an alternate email address) set up on your account then you can try going to https://appleid.apple.com/ and click 'Manage your Apple ID' on the right-hand side of that page and log into your account. Then click on 'Password and Security' on the left-hand side of that page and on the right-hand side you might see an option to send security question reset info to your rescue email address.
    If you don't have a rescue email address (you won't be able to add one until you can answer 2 of your questions) then see if this user tip helps : https://discussions.apple.com/docs/DOC-4551
    e.g. you can try contacting iTunes Support : http://www.apple.com/support/itunes/contact/ - click on Contact iTunes Store Support on the right-hand side of the page, then Account Management , and then try Apple ID Account Security
    or try ringing Apple in your country and ask to talk to the Accounts Security Team : http://support.apple.com/kb/HE57

Maybe you are looking for