Load balancing effect on ssh/https connections

We have a RV016 load balancing between two broadband WAN connections. On protocols that are sensitive to a change in IP address such as ssh and https, if the client connection goes inactive for a short time (sometimes as short as 10 seconds), the RV016 often changes WAN connection as part of its "load balancing" feature. Most protocols do not even notice, but the more sensitive protocols do and often lock a session or timeout the session which is not a good thing.
We have been able to bind these sensitive protcolols to a particular WAN port but (in our minds) this is not an "ideal" situation. In fact I would consider this to be a broken "load balancing" solution and should be fixed.
Does anyone have any "permanent fixes" or ideas on this?
Thanks!

Sorry Tom, but I wrote (edited for clarity): "What would happen [..] when the particular WAN chosen goes down? Does the system apply the same binding to ***another WAN*** until the original one comes back up, will it ignore the bining and so break any new sessions of the same protocol or will it simply fail (no connection)?"
I did not write "the other WAN". That is, I am considering the case, quite common, of more than two WANs.
Proper load balancing is described here:
http://help.mysonicwall.com/sw/eng/305/ui2/23100/Network/WAN_Failover_Load_Balancing.htm
"About Source and Destination IP Address Binding
When you establish a connection with a WAN, you can create multiple interfaces, dividing up the task load over these interfaces. There are both Primary and Secondary WAN interfaces. This task distribution model maintains high performance, ensuring that one interface does not become an impasse to the point where it blocks traffic from passing. This process is WAN Load Balancing.
While WAN Load Balancing addresses performance challenges, it can create other problems, including losing track of sessions. Session confusion can occur because some applications fail to adequately track multiple user sessions load-balanced on multiple interfaces. These applications treat incoming packets as originating from different users because they use IP addresses to differentiate user sessions instead of application-layer user identification tags.
To ensure that you have proper connectivity in all applications, SonicWALL provides a feature called Source and Destination IP Addresses Binding, a solution that maintains a consistent mapping of traffic flows with a single outbound WAN interface."
and their appliances are no more expensive than Cisco multi WAN ones...

Similar Messages

  • Load Balancing with ACE using HTTP Header information

    Hello,
    I am trying to setup a class-map using http loadbalance match-all.
    What I want to do is check for the HTTP Host and if it doesnot match the http referer than go to server farm A. if it does match then go to server farm B.
    My problem is the host can be serveral different values as well as the referer. Can you setup varibales in the ACE so I can store the value from http host and compare it against http referer?
    Thanks
    Mike C.

    It should be like this (If you want to use separate class maps for referrer & Host).
    class-map type http loadbalance match-any site1-HostHDR
    2 match http header Host header-value ".*site1.com"
    class-map type http loadbalance match-any site1-Referer
    2 match http header Referer header-value "http://site1.*"
    class-map type http loadbalance match-any site2-HostHDR
    2 match http header Host header-value ".*site2.com"
    class-map type http loadbalance match-any site2-Referer
    2 match http header Referer header-value "http://site2.*"
    class-map type http loadbalance match-all Site1-policy
    2 match class-map site1-HostHDR
    3 match class-map site1-Referer
    class-map type http loadbalance match-all Site2-policy
    2 match class-map site2-HostHDR
    3 match class-map site2-Referer
    policy-map type loadbalance http first-match Site1
    class Site1-policy
    serverfarm SFarm-A
    class Site2-policy
    serverfarm SFarm-A
    class class-default
    serverfarm SFARm-B
    Syed Iftekhar Ahmed

  • Load balancing to JDBC connection pool

    from http://e-docs.bea.com/wls/docs61///////cluster/overview.html
    "WebLogic Server provides limited load balancing support for managing JDBC
    connections in a cluster. If you create an identical JDBC DataSource in each
    clustered WebLogic Server instance and configure those DataSources to use
    different connection pools, the cluster can support load balancing for JDBC
    connections. Note, however, that WebLogic Server provides no special load
    balancing policies for accessing connection pools. If one of your connection
    pools runs out of JDBC connections, the load balancing algorithm may still
    direct connection requests to the empty pool."
    How is this different from creating one connection pool with one datasource
    and targetting the cluster. Are they talking about load-balancing to
    different databases, or different servers in WLS. from a servlet or from a
    client side app?
    Can anyone elaborate?
    Thanks in advance.

    hi,
    without knowing the entire set of requirements or the motivation behind doing this, a few words from me
    this is usually done transparently to the applications server, that is having eg. Oracle instances mirroring eachother for extreme high-availability requirements.
    1. I would have taken the liberty of calling this business funcionality and let my middleware do the implementation of this. The most elegant solution would probably be to call the master DB for the CUD operation, then post a message to a queue letting the slave DB be updated asynchronously. If the message could not be sent, throw an exception and have the entire operation rolled back.
    If however this must happen realtime and transactions must be consistent, there are a few points to consider. And the quieing bit would not work.
    if this is something that should be done for all Create, Update and Delete operations, an intercepting JDBC driver could do the trick. Although there are all sorts of different problems that could arise from this, for starters, at least one of the DBMS involved here should be XA compliant. If the entire transaction should be XA compliant, both DBMS must be XA compliant. Next as for the transaction towards the "mirroring" DBMS you would have to do all the transaction stuff your self.
    For an example of an intercepting JDBC driver, I found thisone
    http://media.datadirect.com/download/docs/jdbc/jdbcref/spy.html
    I would guess that there are quite a few more.
    - [url http://blog.thej2eestruggle.com]Anders Mathisen
    Edited by anders.mathisen at 01/21/2007 2:53 PM

  • SmartView connections using load balancing

    Is there a way to create a connection in SmartView to the Planning application that uses the load balancing functionality? When we log into the Planning web application we have a connection that provides load balancing between the 2 Planning servers. It appears that the only connection you can provide in SV for Planning is a direct connection to a web server like this: http(s)://<servername>:8300/HyperionPlanning/SmartView.

    I did a second look at my configuration and it actually looks like Workspace is the only Smartview connection that I have load balanced. For Planning, once connected to the Hyperion Provider Service URL the Planning applications show under the Common Provider Connections. The Planning connections point to the URL of the APS.....which is just like what you use. http://servername:8300/HyperionPlanning/SmartView
    Reading through the EPM High Availability Guide, it appears that it can be done for APS but it seems that might no longer support Planning:
    The following list specifies supported clustering methodologies for EPM System product and components (with sublists for components) and options for removing single points of failure from the architecture and maintaining consistent performance through load balancing.
    Oracle Essbase—Clustering with Oracle Hyperion Provider Services for high availability and load balancing
    Note: High availability for Essbase with Provider Services does not support write-back.
    See the Oracle Hyperion Enterprise Performance Management System Manual Deployment Guide.
    - Essbase Administration Services—None
    - Oracle Essbase Integration Services Server—None
    - Essbase services
    - Oracle Essbase Studio Server—None
    - Essbase services—Provider Services clustering for high availability and load-balancing (read-only)
    See Chapter 3, “Clustering EPM System Products with Proprietary Application Servers.”
    - Provider Services Web application—Java application server clustering for high availability and load-balancing
    See the Oracle Hyperion Enterprise Performance Management System Manual Deployment
    Guide.
    Clustering with Provider Services
    If Essbase is clustered with Provider Services and no third-party tool:
    - Smart View must be used rather than an Excel add-in.
    - Essbase has no write-back capability and should be used for reporting only; therefore, Oracle Hyperion Planning, Fusion Edition is not supported.
    - Nodes must be loaded and calculated individually.

  • Checking number of connection in load balancer

    Hi,
    could you help me find how many connection connected to load balancer in avg and peak connection on daily basis.
    any script or tool to help us find out how many connection hitting to live real servers and VIP,

    Hello,
    You can utilize ACE Device Manger which is a built-in GUI tool to monitor system statistics. It is bundled in any license.
    It is pretty easy to start. You need only basic configurations to access management address via https, and
    snmp community for monitoring.
    # Monitoring a rserver
    You can change time range to view the graph. Options are 1h, 2h, 4h, 8, 24h, or All Date.
    On the ACE, statistics are kept for 7 days or  20,000 hourly records, whichever comes first.
    # Monitoring L7 connection
    I think grapsh for L7 connections are aggregate statistics of all L7 policies.
    Row data view.You can download the data in Excel format.
    You can find more detail about the Device Manager  in the Configuration Guide.
    Some  sample shots of DM view are also on the configuration guide.
    Cisco 4700 Series Application Control Engine  Appliance Device Manager  GUI Configuration Guide
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/app_ntwk_services/data_center_app_services/ace_appliances/vA3_2_5/configuration/device_manager/guide/New_Book.html
    Monitoring  Your Network
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/app_ntwk_services/data_center_app_services/ace_appliances/vA3_2_5/configuration/device_manager/guide/UGmntr.html#wp998451
    Thanks and regards,
    Kimihito.

  • Forms Services availability checking for BIGIP Load Balancer

    We are load balancing across a number of 10.1.2.2 Forms servers using a BIGIP load balancer. Currently our load balancing is done based on which server has the "least connections" to the BIGIP. So far we have been using the following test URL to allow BIGIP to check the availability of the Forms Services on each server.
    http://server:port/forms/frmservlet?ifcmd=status
    This works well however it only checks through to the HTTP level within Forms Services. We encountered a problem when the Forms Services failed to work on a particular server however the above URL showed that everything was OK. The effect of this was that all new users attempting to login were directed to the failed server as this server had the "least number of connections".
    After raising an SR with Oracle they advised that the forking of runtime processes had probably failed and this was not detectable by the load balancer with the above URL. So they have recommended a number of options for checking the status of the Forms Services. These are:
    a) http://server:port/forms/frmservlet
    This loads the default Form and therefore by definition tests the forking of runtime processes. However BIGIP is unable to automatically process the information to distinguish whether the service is up or down. Oracle recommended that if using this method we would need to customise BIGIP to handle the various FRM-xxxx error codes.
    b) http://server:port/forms/frmservlet?userid=scott/tiger@YOURDB&form=yourtestform.
    fmx
    Even more thorough would be to actual log on to the database using a test form as above.
    My question is does anyone out there have experience in checking Forms Services availability using these last two methods as I'm not sure how to customize the load balancer so that it can handle the output of these URLs. Also when using the original URL is it normal to load balance using a "least connections" method or do people out there use a different algorithm.
    Thanks for any help/advise that you can give.
    Regards,
    Philippe

    Well SR followed up and it looks like the only course of action is to use the standard HTTP check: http://server:port/forms/frmservlet?ifcmd=status ...
    ... unless that is you want to do some serious customisation. Oracle don't support any other form of checking.
    I'm guessing from the lack of responses to this thread that this hasn't been an issue for anybody else ... ???
    Any thoughts/suggestions really welcome as we go into production in 4 weeks.
    a) What do people recommend for load balancing Forms ... least connection, round robin ... ?
    b) Do people use http://server:port/forms/frmservlet?ifcmd=status or have some of you used something else?
    Thanks,
    Philippe

  • Load Balancer URL is not working properly

    Hi
    I have an issue when I am trying to use my load balancer URI for my web services.
    I am trying to open the webservice URI in the browser which is on the following location
    https://soa.xyz.com/soa-infra/services/default/Order!1.0*soa_c37f07ab-e0f5-4267-bc9c-5dde677efe9f/order_client_ep?WSDL
    when I open it I notice that the abstract wsdl tag has http connection and not https. And also it shows my node1 uri instead of load balancer uri.
    <abstractWSDL>http://node1.xyz.com:8001/soa-infra/services/default/Order!1.0/Order.wsdl</abstractWSDL>
    When I try importing this WSLD onto jDev I get the following error
    Exception:
    WSDLException: faultCode=PARSE_ERROR: Failed to read wsdl file at <load-balancer wsdl uri>
    caused by: javax.net.ssl.SSLHandshakeException :
    javax.net.ssl.SSLHandshakeException : sun.security.validator.ValidatorException: No trust certificate found.
    - This is a two node cluster with a loadbalancer
    -- On both nodes, http, WebLogic and SOA installed
    -- WL Admin server was setup on node1
    -- On loadbalancer a self signed SSL certificate was installed and this cerificate was imported on both nodes.
    -- All services are up
    Can anyone tell me if I have missed something during configuration or something else? Any help would be appreciated.
    Thanks.

    Hi,
    Enable the SSL debug to see what's happening... Have a look at this...
    https://blogs.oracle.com/WebLogicServer/entry/ssl_troubleshooting_and_debugg
    Cheers,
    Vlad

  • Network Load Balancing not failing over properly

    I have 2 MS 2012 servers setup in a NLB unicast configuration, with 2 NICs each on the same subnet.  When I take down the second server (and only the second server) the FQDN goes offline.  Below are the ipconfigs for each server.  Any help
    would be greatly appreciated!
    Ethernet adapter Data NIC 192.168.220.172:
       Connection-specific DNS Suffix  . :
       Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Intel(R) I350 Gigabit Network
    #4
       Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 6C-3B-E5-B2-48-60
       DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No
       Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes
       IPv4 Address. . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.220.172(Preferred)
       Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0
       Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.220.1
       DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.220.100
                                           192.168.200.10
       NetBIOS over Tcpip. . . . . . . . : Enabled
    Ethernet adapter Cluster NIC:
       Connection-specific DNS Suffix  . :
       Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Broadcom BCM57810 NetXtreme II
    DIS VBD Client) #67
       Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 02-BF-C0-A8-DC-AA
       DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No
       Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes
       IPv4 Address. . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.220.171(Preferred)
       Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0
       IPv4 Address. . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.220.170(Preferred)
       Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0
       Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.220.1
       DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.220.100
                                           192.168.200.10
       NetBIOS over Tcpip. . . . . . . . : Enabled
    Ethernet adapter Data NIC 192.168.220.174:
       Connection-specific DNS Suffix  . :
       Description . . . . . . . . . . . : HP FlexFabric 10Gb 2-port 533FLR-
    r #54
       Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : A0-D3-C1-F6-96-08
       DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No
       Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes
       IPv4 Address. . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.220.174(Preferred)
       Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0
       Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.220.1
       DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.220.100
                                           192.168.200.10
       NetBIOS over Tcpip. . . . . . . . : Enabled
    Ethernet adapter Cluster NIC:
       Connection-specific DNS Suffix  . :
       Description . . . . . . . . . . . : HP NC523SFP 10Gb 2-port Server Ad
       Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 02-BF-C0-A8-DC-AA
       DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No
       Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes
       IPv4 Address. . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.220.173(Preferred)
       Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0
       IPv4 Address. . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.220.170(Preferred)
       Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0
       Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.220.1
       DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.220.100
                                           192.168.200.10
       NetBIOS over Tcpip. . . . . . . . : Enabled

    Hi MS DEF,
    A second network adapter is required to provide peer-to-peer communication between cluster hosts. Please isolate your heartbeat network. With unicast when cluster is connected
    to a switch, incoming packets are sent to all the ports on the switch, which can cause switch flooding, please confirm you have setup your switch correct, you can refer the following Cisco Switch related unicast configuration.
    The Cisco switch unicast related information:
    How to configure Microsoft Network Load Balancing on two switches
    https://supportforums.cisco.com/discussion/11918276/how-configure-microsoft-network-load-balancing-two-switches
    More information:
    Selecting the Unicast or Multicast Method of Distributing Incoming Requests
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc782694(v=ws.10).aspx
    An Optimal Network Load Balancing (NLB) Configuration
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/clint_huffman/archive/2007/10/08/an-optimal-network-load-balancing-nlb-configuration.aspx
    Selecting the Unicast or Multicast Method of Distributing Incoming Requests
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc782694(v=ws.10).aspx
    I’m glad to be of help to you!
    We
    are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this
    interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time.
    Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.

  • Load balancing in Oracle RAC 11g (11.1.0.6.0)

    Hi!
    One of our customers use load balancing, now all users get connected against node 2.
    --The configuration of load balancing will be correct I think, have worked before
    --How do I verify the load on each node ?
    --What can be wrong?
    --Need help, what to check?
    --tnsnames.ora looks like
    X.world =
    (DESCRIPTION =
    (ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = TCP)(HOST = X)(PORT = 1521))
    (ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = TCP)(HOST = X)(PORT = 1521))
    (LOAD_BALANCE = yes)
    (CONNECT_DATA =
    (SERVER = DEDICATED)
    (SERVICE_NAME = X.X.se)
    Regards
    T

    Hi,
    --The configuration of load balancing will be correct I think, have worked before
    --How do I verify the load on each node ?
    --What can be wrong?
    --Need help, what to check?
    Services
    Traditionally an Oracle database provided a single service and all users connected to the same service.
    A database will always have this default database service that is the database name.This service cannot be modified and will always allow you to connect to the database.
    Do not use the default database service, create at least one service.
    With Oracle Database 11g, a database can have many services (up to a maximum of 115 per database).
    The services hide the complexity of the cluster from the client by providing a single system image for managing work. Applications and mid-tier connection pools select a service by using the Service Name in their connection data.
    http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/database/clustering/overview/awmrac11g-133673.pdf
    http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B28359_01/rac.111/b28254/hafeats.htm
    Regards,
    Levi Pereira

  • Oracle RAC Concept  - load balancing

    Hello All,
    I have a question about Oracle RAC and how it balance loading.
    What I know about Oracle RAC that it balancing load between its node, so if a new session is connected to the Database it will execute on the node which have less load.
    If I am having an application that connects to the database with few number of sessions and some sessions have huge (huge load) processes to execute while the other sessions are executing small process (in terms of load).
    So below is an example scenario that i am asking for an answer of it:
    if am having a two node RAC database.
    My application that is connected to this RAC database wants to execute three processes P1, P2 and P3 each will have a session correspondingly S1, S2 and S3
    Let is say that P1 will take 60% of the database resources (memory ....) and P2 will take 1% and P3 1%.
    So my question is it a sessions load balancing or Processes load balancing ? So in case and randomly (Managed by ORACLE RAC) S1 is connected to node 1 and it is using node 1 resources so the load on node 1 will be 60%, so when S2 and S3 needs to connect it will go to node 2 since node 1 is loaded. in that case i will have Node 1 using 60% of it is resources (becuase of S1 that is executing P1) while node 2 only uses 2 % (because of S2 and S3 that is executing P2 and P3).
    Is that how Oracle RAC works ? or it balance the load of S1 (60%) between node 1 and node 2 ?
    I am asking this question since my application is not users application, so it will connect to the database with few number of sessions, and 1 session of them may execute a huge process while the other are executing small processes.
    So in that case, how RAC is doing the balance loading?
    Regards,

    i hope , this links may help you.
    Thread: Server side Load balancing in RAC
    Server Side Load Balancing Testing
    read Oracle documentation:
    http://www.oracle.com/pls/db102/search?word=server+side+load+balancing&partno=
    http://www.oracleracexpert.com/2010/01/oracle-rac-load-balancing-and-failover.html
    http://www.databasejournal.com/features/oracle/article.php/3659411/Oracle-RAC-Administration---Part-15-Connection-Load-Balancing-and-FAN.htm
    http://oracleinstance.blogspot.com/2010/08/transparent-application-failover-taf.html

  • Weblogic: load balancing and RAC contention

    I cannot locate any useful documentation on this: I am trying to find the optimal configuration to allow an Weblogic Application server to load balance to RAC.
    I see high numbers of v$sqlstats.clwait_delta for sessions connected from weblogic servers; typically from 25-95% over the overall statement execution time.
    Configuration is a three node RAC 10.2.0.4 on Linux; with and eight node weblogic cluster connected using about 150 sessions (equally divided between the rac nodes), hosting a number of applications. They use "Least Connections" load balancing which means any thread(/connection) could be used next. The weblogic sessions connect to a RAC service that is configured with LOAD_BALANCE=YES.
    I suspect that contention is caused by behaviour such as
    - insert on one node, then immediately query back on another node
    - inserts to indexed tables being distributed across all three nodes.
    There is too much going on here, and I want to simplify the configuration to eliminate contention for the same data blocks across nodes - this will likely mean new database services configured with LOAD_BALANCE=NO and some form of application partitioning on the weblogic servers. There are other load balancing schemes available for weblogic; but none seem designed to work well with rac.
    Is there any best practice documentation available to configure weblogic on RAC (as opposed to single-instance, which doesnt have any such contention issues).
    Any pointers appreciated!
    Rgds
    Mark Teehan
    Singapore

    Hi,
    see these 2 whitepapers:
    http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/database/enterprise-edition/twpracwkldmgmt-132994.pdf
    http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/database/enterprise-edition/bestpracticesforxaandrac-128676.pdf
    they should provide you with enough information on what to do.
    Regards
    Sebastian

  • Testing Forms Services availability with Hardware Load Balancer

    I have posted a question about load balancing to a group of application services running Forms Services here on the Forms forum but have had no reply:
    Forms Services availability checking for BIGIP Load Balancer
    My basic questions are:
    a) What do people recommend for load balancing Forms ... least connection, round robin ... ?
    b) Do people use http://server:port/forms/frmservlet?ifcmd=status or have some of you used something else?
    My reason for the question is we had a Forms Services failure that was not detected by the ifcmd servlet as the HTTP side of things was still working. This meant that the BIGIP load balancer sent everything to the failed server as it had the least connections. So basically no-one could logon.
    I've raised an SR with Oracle but they recommend the standard URL above. Has anyone else had a problem like this and if so were you able to fix it?
    Regards,
    Philippe

    Well SR followed up and it looks like the only course of action is to use the standard HTTP check: http://server:port/forms/frmservlet?ifcmd=status ...
    ... unless that is you want to do some serious customisation. Oracle don't support any other form of checking.
    I'm guessing from the lack of responses to this thread that this hasn't been an issue for anybody else ... ???
    Any thoughts/suggestions really welcome as we go into production in 4 weeks.
    a) What do people recommend for load balancing Forms ... least connection, round robin ... ?
    b) Do people use http://server:port/forms/frmservlet?ifcmd=status or have some of you used something else?
    Thanks,
    Philippe

  • Exchange 2013 Load Balancing Question

    Hey Everyone,
        I have recently started building up my companies Exchange 2013 environment and ran into some questions that I can't seem to find clear answers for on Google.
        First, a little bit about my set up:
    2 CAS Servers
    2 Mailbox Servers
    Citrix NetScaler load balancing the external URL (Controlling all incoming ports 25, 80, 443, 587, 993, and 995) to both of my CAS servers
    This is not doing SSL offloading, it's just forwarding encrypted traffic to the CAS servers
    I have configured a DAG between the 2 mailbox servers and am able to actively move the database my user account is on between the 2 copies with outlook disconnecting / reconnecting in about 10 - 15 seconds of moving it.
    My questions started when I saw what Outlook was filling in for the "Server" field once autodiscover set it up.  I found this very strange server name in it:  *** Email address is removed for privacy ***
    Once I read up on it, I think i understand what it does.   If i understand correctly, this weird URL is sort of like an old CAS array from Exchange 2010.  When I started testing the failover is when I started running into issues.
    When I shut down one of my mailbox servers, my outlook will lose connection and it won't come back.  The mailbox database that my user account is on successfully failed over to the other DAG copy but outlook never correctly connects.  I
    believe this issue has something to do with the new CAS functions of Exchange 2013 since DAG works fine.
    If I look at my "Connection Status" in Outlook, I see that there are several connections open.  All of them have a Proxy server address of "exchange.domain.com" and out of the 3 that show up there, they are all pointed to
    the weird URL mentioned above.
    Whew, long post but let me summarize my questions below:
    1)  If exchange is configured to be fully redundant, why does my outlook disconnect when I shut down one of the servers?
    2)  What is the weird URL pointing to that I mentioned above that is showing in outlook?
    3)  How can I get outlook to correctly not lose it's connection when any 1 of the servers goes down?
    Thanks,
    Zac

    Hi,
    According to your description, it seems that the load balancer did not configure successfully.
    I recommend you refer to the following article to configure the load balancer for Exchange 2013 :
    http://blogs.vmware.com/vsphere/2012/11/load-balancing-using-vcloud-networking-and-security-5-1-edge.html 
    Hope this helps!
    Thanks.
    Niko Cheng
    TechNet Community Support

  • Load Balancing in SICF Service

    Hi,
    I have set Up Load Balancing for a Logon Group in the SICF service.
    In transacion SMMS, the parameter ms_Service_port_xx is maintained for HTTP for each server in the landscape.
    Is this all I have to do for Load Balancing or there is any additional settings ?
    Also, how to use the Session Timeout parameter in the SICF service (Just below Load Balancing )
    Thanks
    Anand

    Hello,
    The Logon group in SICF does not do any load balancing by itself.
    HTTP Load balancing is the job of the SAP web dispatcher which connects with HTTP to the message server to get the information about application servers and logon groups.
    You can also use directly the message server bu it is a bad solution because it's not really load balancing but merely redirects. A browser shortcut would redirect always to the same application server.
    Regards,
    Olivier

  • Hardware load balancer config

    Hi,
    EBS Release-12.1.3 ,
    Apps -2 nodes HA,
    Hardware load balancer-F5 in DMZ(Single Entry point for load balancing)
    We have chosen HTTP Layer Hardware Load Balancing for persistentant session config
    please advice that what kind of changes we need to do at the application level in order to implement Hardware load balancer like,
    Can we configure EBS application to run on 443 port ,so as to directly redirect appln url from hardware load balancer to 443 port of EBS application node.
    without reverse proxy configuration.
    If reverse proxy in DMZ is required then how hardware load balancing will be configure for http layer balancing between nodes.
    As we have iSupplier in internet connectivity,please suggest which kind of implementation we can go for.
    Thanks
    Edited by: user10702579 on 21 Sep, 2012 3:46 AM

    Not necessarily - it depends on how F5 is configured. As stated, one of the settings on the F5 allows traffic from the client to be addressed to the virtual URL on the F5 using port 443 (https), and the F5 can then direct traffic to the real application servers on the port on which EBS is configured. The return traffic from the application server back to the F5 uses the same EBS port, and when the F5 send the traffic back to the client it can use 443 - so as far as the client is concerned, it looks like the entire application is SSL enabled (using 443).
    If this setting is not configured in the F5, then EBS will have to be reconfigured to use 443 throughout.
    HTH
    Srini

Maybe you are looking for

  • Animated GIF ignoring frame timing

    I am trying to create simple animated GIFs with a few layers of text that simply fade in and fade out in sequence. My initial attempt worked perfectly. Most frames use the default 7/100's of a second delay as they fade. A few frames were manually set

  • How much is possible?

    I'm currently designing a new website. It will be a very informative website (for dog owners in the city I live in), but it should also be fun and just useful. I already have two websites, done in iWeb, and I want this one to be even more professiona

  • Can you convert your desktop site plan into the phone & tablet version w/o re-creating the pages?

    Can you convert your desktop site plan into the phone & tablet version without re-creating the landing pages? This seems too extensive to have to re-design each page?

  • How do I uninstall My Start as the search engine

    I have uninstalled incredimail and have tried everything I can find in trying to get rid of My Start as the search engine with no luck and feel that this is now becoming such an annoyance as to be invading my privacy

  • URGENT: Need to stop screen flicker (PWM) on T420s with IntelPWMControl

    I see other users have managed to use this program 'IntelPWMControl' to stop their LCD screen from flickering (PWM) on their machines with intel HD graphics: www.youtube.com/watch?v=ycKzTDnTYTQ Another useful thread, outlines how to do this http://fo