Load Balancing on two server nodes at the sender side...

Hi Experts,
I am sending a huge message (this message is being splitted into multiple messages depending on the load and zipped, this whole process of splitting and zipping is done by the scripts) zipped from sender side , when I am monitoring in message monitoring tool I found that all the load is on one server node and other server node is free as we have two server nodes , how to distribute the message equally between these two nodes.
The same Load balancing is working properly at the receiver end (load is getting distributed between two server nodes). Not sure why this is not the case at the sender side.
Please throw some light on this issue.
Thanks a lot for your kind help in advance.

Hi,
Follow this blog this may helpful to you
Handling Large files in XI
/people/pooja.pandey/blog/2005/10/17/number-formatting-to-handle-large-numbers
file size can be handeled in client java proxy and the message is parsed in xi. this will not have much of performance issue. but yes when the smae is handeled by xi. and yes this scenario can be efficiently handeled from java client proxy
limit on the number of 'field-set' lines you can send to the ITS?
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/72e2bb90-0301-0010-e883-c390ad8a975a
Processing huge file loads through XI
Edited by: Venkataramesh Boppana on May 17, 2008 12:54 AM

Similar Messages

ACE30 load balancing across two slightly different rservers

Hi,
is there a possibility to get a load balancing across two rservers so:
when client sends http://vip/ and it goes to rserver1 then url is sent without change
when client sends http://vip/ and it goes to rserver2 then url is modified to http://vip/xyz/
Or maybe load balancing can be done across two serverfarms ?
thanks

Ryszard,
I hope you are doing great.
I do not think that´s possible since the ACE just load balance the traffic to the servers and once the load balance decision has been taken it will pass the "ball" to the chosen server.
Think about this, let´s say user A needs to go to Server1 but guess what? based on the load balance decision it was sent to Server2 which unfortunately does not have what the customer was looking for. OK, fine, user A close the connection and tries again but now the Server1 is down then the only available is Server2 then the ACE sends it to Server2 again then user A just decides to leave, you see how bad that can be.
A better approach would be to have either 2 VIPs ( different IP addresses) or 2 with the same IP address but hearing on another port, perhaps, one port per server.
Hope this helps!
Jorge

Load balancing on RMI Server Application

Hi there, I'd like to know more detail about load balancing on RMI server application, been digging the web for some time, but couldn't find much information, does anyone know any website or has the knowledge of load balancing on RMI to share? Sort like its design and implementation.
Thanks,
Jax

I want performance and fault-tolerance,
In that case, is it necessary to have a main
rmi server to allow client to access and pick one of
the rmi servers for the client?Well, if you have one main RMI server, you have a single point of failure again.. Why can't your application know about all rmi servers, and randomly choose one? If it's down, pick a different one.. If your applicatoin is an applet, you'll have to sign it.. Do that and put it on 2 redundant web servers. You have performance by splitting the load and you have your fault tolerance by having x identical rmi servers.
If you're saying what I think, why would you have one main rmi server that picks a different rmi server? That's more work AND your redundancy goes byebye, ie if your main rmi server dies..

CSS Load Balancing Citrix Terminal server, is ti possible ?

Hi we have to balance a Terminal Server Citrix Server Farm with css, did anyone already realize it? Is there any problem to do it ? Someone told me there is nat problem with citrix metaframe terminal server, has anyone information about it ?
Any help will be greatly appreciated. Many thanks
Max

Stickyness means that once a user is directed to a server through the load balancer, that user will remain on the server he was first load balanced to for the duration of their connection. Otherwise, every tcp connection that a user makes is load balanced to whatever servers are configured. There are severalways to configure stickyness. You can do it via:
-source IP
-source IP and destination port
-text string in a cookie or URL
-SSL session ID
take a look at this document that explains it better than I could:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/contnetw/ps792/products_configuration_guide_chapter09186a0080772d96.html

Load balancing 2 DNS server

how to configure the CSS to load balance 2 DNS server ?

first configure the services like this :
service dns1
ip address x.x.x.x
active
service dns2
ip address x.x.x.x
active
Then configure the content rule
owner mycompany
content dns
vip address x.x.x.x
add service dns1
add service dns2
active
Then we need to setup something for the dns answer
group dns
vip address x.x.x.x !!!!! same as for the content rule
add service dns1
add service dns2
portmap disable
The portmap disable requires software 5.03(33) or above.
The command is also in 5.01
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/contnetw/ps789/prod_release_note09186a00800ba0c6.html

T3 Load Balancing with Weblogic Server 6.1

We are using rwo weblogic 6.1 servers A and B behind a load balancer with a DNS name (eg. www.loadbalancer.com). We are using T3 for Java client to application server communication. The client creates the Initial context with the load balancer url,creates remote objects using the context, closes the initial context and then tries to get a new initial Context. What we noticed is even though the client closes the first context and gets a new one, the client is always hooked on to only one server making load balancing ineffective. Is there a T3 configuration to release the connection when we close the context ? The documentation says only one T3 is established per client JVM.

Rick,
You may want to look at the Alteon and F5 configuration we have on edocs.
Take a look at the following URLs for a possible solution
http://edocs.bea.com/wls/docs61/cluster/alteon.html#591902
http://edocs.bea.com/wls/docs61/cluster/bigip.html#591902
Chuck Nelson
DRE
BEA Technical Support

Two server sockets on the same machine, one not working.

Dear forum users.
I'm currently having a problem with running two server sockets on the same computer.
It gives no exceptions or anything, just that if i connect with another machine, the last serversocket that started,
will not accept connections..
Scenario:
Computer 1: Main server.
Computer 1: Game server.
Computer 2: Client
Computer 2 connects first to the main server (lets say port 13371)
Then connects to game server (port 6112).
Computer 2 failes to connect to the Game server for some reason.
But if i open a client at Computer 1, connects to main server, and then game server, it
works fine.
And if I put computer 2 as a Game server,
then everything works fine.
Working scenario:
Computer 1: Main server.
Computer 2: Game server
Computer 2: Client
Computer 1: Client
Now, however many that wants to connect to game server, works.
I have gone through the code 100 times now it feels like. And still dont see why this happends.
Anyone know if it is "working as intended"? Or just me doing something completely wrong that i cant see myself?
Sorry for not posting code, its too much code to post.

Oh, sorry.
TCPServer:
protected ServerSocket serverSocket;
public abstract void processConnection(Socket client);
    public void listen() {
        try {
            report("Listening to clients on port: " + portNumber);
            while (serverSocket != null && acceptConnections) {
                processConnection(serverSocket.accept());
                report("Client accepted on serverSocket.");
        } catch (SocketException e) {
            report("TCPServer/listenForClients : SocketException.", e);
        } catch (Exception e) {
            report("TCPServer/listenForClients : Unknown Exception.", e);
        cleanUp();
        report("Stopped listening on port: " + portNumber);
    }MainServer extends the TCPServer:
    public void processConnection(Socket client) {
        try {
            MainServer_Client tmp = new MainServer_Client(client, this);
            synchronized (clients) {
                clients.add(tmp);
            Thread th = new Thread(tmp);
            th.start();
        } catch (Exception e) {
            report("MainServer/processConnection : Unknown Exception", e);
    }GameServer extends TCPServer
    public void processConnection(Socket client) {
        try {
            client.setTcpNoDelay(true);
            GameServer_ServerClient tmp = new GameServer_ServerClient(client, this);
            synchronized(clients) {
                clients.add(tmp);
            Thread th = new Thread(tmp);
            th.start();
        } catch(Exception e) {
            report("GameServer_Host/processConnection : Unknown Exception",e);
            e.printStackTrace();
    }Edited by: Lgeee on Apr 30, 2010 2:57 AM

What is the name of the small part that comes lose when you are removing the two battery screws on the left side of the battery, the small part is under the top screw when removing the iPhone 4s battery?

What is the name of the small part that comes lose when you are removing the two battery screws on the left side of the battery, the small part is under the top screw when removing the iPhone 4s battery?

It's the part that means you've voided your warranty and the right to get an out-of-warranty replacement from Apple.

The mail server responded: sorry, the sender name and auth login doesn't coincide (#5.7.1)

I get the following message on trying to send emails from my yahoo account
An error occurred while sending mail. The mail server responded: sorry, the sender name and auth login doesn't coincide (#5.7.1). Please verify that your email address is correct in your Mail preferences and try again.
Help!

Check if the client connector used to connect with the 587 port is allowed to accept authentication on Plain Text.
Try a relay connector if you want to send the email without the authentication.
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb232021(v=exchg.141).aspx
Syed MM Messaging SME - IBM || MCTS || MCSE || MCSA || VCP5 || VCA ||

Jco.webas.ignore_jdsr_error=1 in the sender side RFC adapter of RFC to SOAP scenario

Hello Team,
I am doing RFC to SOAP scenario after configuring the scenario i have checked the sender side communication channel it is not throughing any errors and it shows the status as green but it is displaying a short message
it is the short log displayed while checking the sender side RFC communication channel it shows that "jco.webas.ignore_jdsr_error=1" can please any one suggest me how we can solve the issue.
Regards,
Avinash.

Hi Avinash - I don't think that is an error instead it just displays your system configuration.
your RFC adapter should work i believe..
Are you facing any issues?
(I think the parameter is nothing but the value @ nwa/java system properties/XPI Adapter:RFC -> ignoreJrfcJdsrError(true/false))

Can File Adpater read EBCDIC file on the sender side

Hi ,
I Have file to Proxy scenario and on the sender side I have EBCDIC file can file adpater can read it into normal text format can any one suggest me how to encode the file
Thanks Inadvance
Byee

Hi ,
Since my scenario is File to Proxy I need to send data to Proxy I cant send it in EBCDIC format ..... So I want data to bein normal text format........
I am looking for it .........
for EJB do you have any piece of code... that will be helpfull
Thanks Inadvance....

Solution load Balancing for two Servers run Sun One Web Server 7.0

Hi All ,
I must configure load balancing web server for two server . Could you tell me Solution ?
Please help
Thanks .

The following should help you configure Web Server to reverse proxy (load balance) to your two backend servers.
[http://blogs.sun.com/amit/entry/setting_up_a_reverse_proxy|http://blogs.sun.com/amit/entry/setting_up_a_reverse_proxy]

Server Load-balancing Across Two Data centers on Layer 3

Hi,
I have a customer who would like to load balance two Microsoft Exchange 2010 CAS Servers which are residing across two data centers.
Which is the best solution for this? Cisco ACE or Cisco ACE GSS or both?

I would go with source natting the clients ip addresses, so that return traffic from the servers is routed correctly.
It saves you the trouble with maintaining PBR as well.
Source NAT can be done on the ACE, by applying the configuration to either the load balancing policy, or adding the configuration to the class-map entries in the multi-match policy.
Cheers,
Søren
Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPad App

Internet load balancing with two machine (NLB)

i have install two TMG 2010 and one is manger and one managed , but seems once manager down , other server not passing the traffic with vip , my question is does it supported like NLB with two machine ?

Hi,
Coud you confirm you can ping sucecssfully both of two machine before?
To check if the NLB status is green:
In the Forefront TMG Management console, in the tree, click the Monitoring node.
In the Alerts tab, check that NLB Started for each array member.
In the Network Load Balancing Manager (nlbmgr), check the status of the current node for all clusters define. Repeat this for each member.
Run nlb display to view the current state of the NLB cluster and hosts. Repeat this for each membe
http://technet.microsoft.com/es-es/library/ff849728.aspx#s3
Best Regards
Quan Gu

SAP GLM Print Request - Load Balancing of WWI server

Hi GLM Experts,
I am using new GLM + module that generates labels based on Print Requests. I am unable to understand how I can load balance the WWI services when there are multiple label printing requests.
In GLM + we associate a WWI to a Print Station and which can then be associated with a printer. So in the configuration we are tying up a printer a WWI.
Also during label printing, if the scenario uses print request module, then the use need to select a print station and printer. What happens if the WWI related to the print station is down?
For example I have two services in WWI server GENPC1 and GENPC2. I created WWII and WWI2 as two print stations. I will associate my printer PRNWWI to both the print stations WWI1 and WWI2.
During label printing if the user picks and WWI1 and Printer PDNWWI and if the GENPC1 WWI server assocaited with print status WWI1 is busy and down I want WWI GENPC2 to generate the label?
How to setup the above load balancing or fall back? Please let me know.
Thanks
Pugal

Dear Pugal
we are not using GLM + and I am not sure about the technqiue used there to handle load balancing. Regarding general WWI setup I assume you know this Note: EH&amp;S: Availability and performance of WWI and Expert servers
On the top there is a further SAP Note abvailable which might be of interest. This is referenced here:
http://de.scribd.com/doc/191576739/011000358700000861002013-e
May be check OSS note: 1958655; OSS Note 1155294 is more related to normal WWI stuff; but may be check it as well. May be 1934253 might help better
May be this might help.
C.B.
PS: may be check as well: consolut - EHS_MD_140_01 - EH&amp;S-Management-Server einrichten
The load balancing of synchron WWi servers is donein the "RFC" layer, therefore you have no inffluence here, for asynchron WWI servers you can do a lot to manage the WWI load balancing by using "exits" etc.

Load Balancing on two server nodes at the sender side...

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for