Local field in infoset

Question

hi,
I want to check personnel 0008 infotype wagetype amount and scale amount.
ex. personnel p0008-bet01 = 2000 but from t510 p0008 scale data derives amount 1800,
To compare these 2 amount, within an ad-hoc query, I added an edditional field to 8 infotype in infoset.
after that no error appears, when query run frım sq01, if added field selected ad hoc does not run, orherwise ad hoc runs.
how should I write code for additionbal field.
here is the code that I added to code part of local field.
tables:t510.
get pernr.
select single betrg from t510 into sklucrt
where molga = 47 and trfar = p0008-trfar and trfgb = p0008-trfgb
and trfkz = 1 and trfgr = p0008-trfgr and trfst = p0008-trfst and lgart = p0008-lga01
and begda le p0008-begda and endda ge p0008-endda.

Answer 1

Hi Kara,
first the field BET01 of IT0008 is a repeat field. That means all subsequent values from BET02 ... BET40 are processing in the query using the DO ... VARYING statement.
Now to your coding.
You must not use GET PERNR in your code! This is of course automatically added by the query generator and if you add it in your coding the statement will come up twice.
Second your date comaprison is wrong.
You always have to select with
ITx-BEGDA <= ITy-ENDDA  AND
ITx-ENDDA >= ITy-BEGDA
to get the correct set. Make a drawing and you will realize why.
So your coding would look like:
* first clear the return value
clear sklucrt.
* select the value from T510
select single betrg from t510 into sklucrt
where molga = 47 and
trfar = p0008-trfar and
trfgb = p0008-trfgb and
trfkz = 1 and
trfgr = p0008-trfgr and
trfst = p0008-trfst and
lgart = p0008-lga01 and
begda le p0008-ENDDA and
endda ge p0008-BEGDA.
You MUST clear the return value first otherwise you get the old value in case nothing is found.
Tables declaration you also don't need as you make a direkt select into the field SKLUCRT that I assume is your defined additional field in the InfoSet.
But I wonder why you want to do this as the additional fields available calculate the right amount also in case of indirect evaluation.
Regards,
Michael