Lockbox issue for discount amount and incorrect reference

Hi All,
While doing Lockbox processing through FLB2, for certain payment advices discount was not recorded and it was posted directly by the system in price difference(maintained in Reason Code). Also, system did not prompted an error message for the invoice paid with incorrect reference and not even processing to On Account.
In total of discount amount and invoice amount paid with incorrect reference posted to GL Account maintained in one of the Reason codes automatically.
Where could be the error in configuration point of view to check, please advice with your expertise.
Thanks,
Likhit

hi ,
can you pl help me in sending the lockbox config and test file & testing process as my client needs lockbox set up?
i would be thankful to you if could help me inthis regard.
mail: [email protected]
regds,
raman

Similar Messages

MIRO issue (urgent!), amount and quantity fields are not captured from PO

Hi,
When we try to post thought MIRO using PO as reference, quantity and amount fields are not captured. We do MIGO first and then MIRO.
GR based invoice verification in the vendor master is selected and the check mark GR-based in the PO is selected too.
We're getting this MIRO issue for "all" PO and Service Entry Sheet.
We'll appreciate your recommendation in order to fix this critical issue as soon as possible.
Thanks in advance.

I was looking for copy controls and other functions. Glad this is now resolved. You need to award yourself points!
Cheers.

BAI2 Lockbox statement. for Discount component

Hi,
In BAI2 Lockbox ( I am new to this) I have no issue to get the amount matched to Customer Open Item.\
How the discount amount for early payment by customer is repressented in BAI2 ? With minus sign or discount is represented by some code no ?
Thanks,
Chitra.

Hi Orlando,
what was your solution to this problem? I'm also facing the same problem.
Regards,
Andrew

Calculate Discount Percentage from Discount Amount and Vice Versa

Hi Experts,
I have one scenario in Marketing Documents.At the Item Matrix i have two fields, one is Discount%(System Field) and another one is DiscountAmount(UDF).
Whenever i choose discount%, it will calculate Discount Amount.I done these thing on my customization. But Customer wants these scenario as vice versa which means
Discount% <--- Calculation Happen ---> Discount Amount
If i do these scenario on my customization system will get hanged.
Please provide some needfull solution for the above.
Regards,
G.Suresh

HI,
It is seems to be difficult but it is easy at least if you have the IDEA:
One way is ok:
Whenever i choose discount%, it will calculate Discount Amount.I done these thing on my customization.
Backward:
Calculate the discount percent : Discount Amount / Unit Price and write it back into the dicount% field !
You can use a global variable boolean, which blocks the Itemevent or when you write back the percent.
here is a code for itemevent handler and order form, where m_BlockEventHandler is public variable at the begining of the class
and U_DISC is amount type user defined field at row level of marketing documents.
> Dim m_BlockEventHandler As Boolean
           If m_BlockEventHandler = True Then Exit Sub
        If pVal.FormTypeEx = "139" Then
            If pVal.ItemUID = "38" And pVal.ColUID = "U_DISC" And pVal.EventType = BoEventTypes.et_VALIDATE Then
                If pVal.BeforeAction = True Or pVal.ItemChanged = False Or pVal.InnerEvent = True Then Exit Sub
                Dim oMatrix As SAPbouiCOM.Matrix = sbo_application.Forms.ActiveForm.Items.Item("38").Specific
                Dim DiscountAmount As Double = 0.0
                Dim Price As Double = 0.0
                Try
                    DiscountAmount = Convert.ToDouble(oMatrix.Columns.Item(pVal.ColUID).Cells.Item(pVal.Row).Specific.string)
                    Dim s() As String = oMatrix.Columns.Item("14").Cells.Item(pVal.Row).Specific.string.Split(" ")
                    Price = Convert.ToDouble(s(0))
                    Dim newDiscount As Double = 100 * (DiscountAmount) / Price
                    m_BlockEventHandler = True
                    oMatrix.Columns.Item("15").Cells.Item(pVal.Row).Specific.string = newDiscount
                Catch ex As Exception
                    sbo_application.StatusBar.SetText(ex.Message)
                Finally
                    m_BlockEventHandler = False
                End Try
            End If
        End If
it is working me fine !
Regards,
J.
Edited by: Janos Nagy on Jul 31, 2008 4:12 PM

Creative in the dock over driver issues for older cards and upsetting consumers please read!

To Who this may concern at TOP LEVEL AT Creative's Board It's come to my attention to a very serious issue From Creative,and the story starts from here.
I have just required the Audigy 2 ZS Sound Card so looking to install the latest drivers from CREATIVE'S UK WEBSITE. So I look into the date which is 9/4/200 on Creative's website. However I did abit more investigating into the issues from other consumer's from passed half soaked drivers that Creative are supposed to put right with their half asleep development team(what a joke!!).
AS I did more research? on this issue on the forums and hardware websites, it came across to my attention on a Brazilian I. T. Expert called Daniel Kawakami (surprisesurprise and I don't suppose Creative know anything about him other than trying to kick him the balls for his work to help others with their sound cards very good PR work Creative well done!!!!).So armed with all this information and believe me I have gone into alot of reading in the forums about the issues,and yes Creative Board Of Directors you are entitled to your Copy Rights,for now !!!
So I find out more about this super hero Daniel Kawakami? to Creative's miss givings to put right the Drivers for Consumers let down by Creative, I came across one of the driver updates for the Audigy 2 ZS Sound Card done by Daniel Kawakami, and Bingo most consumer's now have a working drivers by him.
So for all the hard work and precious time this Daniel Kawakami has done for Creative Consumers(including me) YOU SELFISH CREATIVE BOARD OF DIRECTOR'S go and kick him the face, so I will say this to you what about his rights as a creative product consumer? ,his driver copy rights and on top that his right to put things right that your team cannot put right in the first place. This is the EXACT PEOPLE WE NEED IN THIS HIGHLY COMPLICATED IT INDUSTRY, so what do you do you try and do, you bin him.
So Creative I am going to ask some questions and I EXPECT YOU TO ANSWER THEM with me as a CONSUMER OF YOUR PRODUCTS(customer is King not you!!)
1. The drivers you realised on the 9th April 200 are working drivers for the Audigy 2 zs for windows 7 ultimate.
2. So how can you convince me that they are working?
3. At the moment I can only trust Daniel Kawakami's? working drivers, since he has had over whelming praise for his work.What makes me think I can trust you with your drivers.
4. Your Drivers came out on the 9/4/200, Daniel Kawakami's Drivers came out on 9/4/200 its too close a call,since your development Team are too lazy to put things right, how can you convince me that you did not copy his Drivers into your download Driver website(I would not be surprised if you did, as it would certainly be a cost cutting exercise ,and taking away his copy rights for all the work he has done for nothing!!!)
5. Are you going to treat customer and consumers better service and support? in the Future,and that includes me,and 3rd party developers like Daniel Kawakami .
The concussion to all of this, there are lessons to be learned by you Creative for your mis givings and the treatment of customers passed and present and especially the appalling treatment of Daniel Kawakami ,this guy deserves far better for his talent. I Have one message for the President Of Creative ,don't you EVER think you can scare me as a customer and also as Registered? disabled deaf person ,and for that reason I have far more powers you will ever have. For what I have read I am so angry and dismayed when someone like Daniel Kawakami is only trying help others ,but to be treated in this way.
It is only right for me to post this ,because You Creative have hurt? alot people and that includes me. I look forward to the comments and p.m.(if I get any) And Daniel Kawakami? I hope you do read this and all the best for the future ,keep doing what you do ,and once again Creative you should be holding your heads in Shame.
Regards Jonoace U.k.

!!! Creative jamais vai responder.
At seria justo se Creative viesse a publico falar de sua incapacidade e que at onde as placas Audigy funcionariam em Vista e ?7.
Mas por?incompet?ncia, pois nem suas novas placas funcionam direito, se era para vender est? mal.
Problemas de memoria superior a 4 gb e tantos outros que Creative no tem respostas;
Drivers de Daniel e Pax so alternativas, mas que tambm tem muitas limitaes.
Sinceramente acho que esta na hora de Creative vir a publico fazer um relato srio, e descrever claramente as limitaes de sua placas colocando um ponto final emexpectativas frustraes eeng dos.
Chega a ser vergonhoso que placas onboard como realtek funcionem melhor que placas Creative;
Realmente, antes era um sonho e orgulho possuir um produto CREATIVE, tornou-se um pesadelo e uma vergonha.
Mas enfim o que fazer, apenas esperar um momento de honestidade por parte de Creative.
Flavio Kern - Audigy 2 ZS
Creative will never respond. So it would be fair if Creative would publish his inability to speak and that even where the plates Audigy would work in Vista and 7. But by incompetence, since neither her new adapter works right, if it was to sell is poorly. Problems of memory above 4 gb, and so many others that Creative does not have answers; Daniel and Pax Drivers are alternati'ves, but which also has many limitations. I honestly think this time Creative come publico do a serious story, and describe clearly the limitations of your cards by putting an end-point on expectations, frustrations and forgeries. It is shameful that onboard realtek cards like that boards Creative work better; Actually, before it was a dream and pride have a CREATIVE product, became a nightmare and a shame. But anyway what to do, just wait a moment of honesty from Creative.
Flavio Kern-Audigy 2 ZS

Weblink issues for copying opportunity and lead records

I am trying to create weblink fields for copying Opportunity and Lead records. I am basically successful for Opportunities except that I can not get picklist or link values (such as the associated account) to copy over.
I am having no success at all for the the lead copying field. My code is as follows:
https://secure-ausomxbha.crmondemand.com/OnDemand/user/LeadsNewPageDefault?OMTGT=LeadCreateEditForm&OMTHD=LeadEditNav&OMRET0=LeadsDetailPage%3focTitle%3dPA%2bCasinos%26OMTGT%3dLeadDetailForm%26OMTHD%3dLeadDetailNav%26ocEdit%3dY%26OCTYPE%3dOther%26ocTitleField%3dFull%2bName%26LeadDetailForm.Id%3dABHA-5SVNQI&LeadCreateEditForm.Id=ABHA-5SVNQI&OCTYPE=Other&LeadCreateEditForm.First Name=%%%First_Name%%%&LeadCreateEditForm.Last Name=%%%Last_Name%%%.
Any thoughts?
Thanks.

Hi,
To my knowledge there is no written documentation available. But this is the way i do it. Go to the lead edit page. Right click in your IE and choose view source. Search for that particular field say "First Name" or "Last Name". As part of the HTML code displaying the field (<input> html tag), you can find the exact field name to be used.
The example in my case is below says the field name is LeadCreateEditForm.First Name
"First Name*</span></td><td class="fv" style="padding-left:6px;height:2px;vertical-align:middle"><input name="LeadCreateEditForm.First Name" size="20" maxlength="50" tabindex="4" type="text" value="Doug" class="inputControl" id="LeadCreateEditForm.First Name" />"
Hope this helps !!!
-- Venky CRMIT

Sales Reports for Sales Amount and GP, Excluding Surcharge

Hi All,
my company is going to charge some customers delivery charge. It is implemented as a kind of surcharge on Sales Orders. The surcharge can be found as a condition type in FI document after posting.
Our salesmen want to know the sales amount and GP (Gross Profit) of material, not include the surcharge.
Could anyone suggest any Sales Reports that can show the GP of material excluding the delivery surcharge?
Regards,
Simon

Hi............
Refer stock posting list report........
regards,

Issue for Form 16 and tax Computation on Salary to Employees

Dear All
Can Anybody suggest a way out for the following -
We have to issue form 16 as per Indian income tax laws to employees. is there any method for computation of tax on salary or any development is required for the same. As per the Indian income Tax law a computation sheet is to be issued to an emmployee wherein his actaul salary earned ( say for two months) plus his estimated salary for remaining 10 months is to be given and employee in turn returns back the form duly signed in. how this computation sheet works in SAP ?
Pl guide.
Regards
Rakesh Choudhary

Hi Rakesh,
this computation happens inside INTAX payroll function for India Payroll. ya its true that there is no standard SAP report to do this. But u can all the annual computation wage type in the RT (/4** wage types).
If u want a seperate report to this then u can go for some Z development. But u dnt need to write the whole computation logic inside that. Instead of this u can use /4** wage types for the same.
Regards,
Praveen
Edited by: Praveen Kr Tiwari on Apr 11, 2009 3:30 PM

Issue with user mapping and SAP reference system

Hello Gurus,
I have this strange system behaviour when preparing my system for single sign-on using user mapping.
Case 1.
In the user management property category, I have the following defined.
Authentication Ticket Type - SAP Logon Ticket
Logon Method - UIDPW
User Mapping Fields -
User Mapping Type - admin, user
In the alias editor, I defined the default alias as SAP_PRD
Result= when I go to identity management to assign the reference system (the default alias - SAP_PRD)...I do not see the system alias there.
Case 2:
In the user management property category, I have the following defined
Authentication Ticket Type - SAP Logon Ticket
Logon Method - SAPLOGONTICKET
User Mapping Fields -
User Mapping Type - admin, user
In the alias editor, I defined the default alias as SAP_DEV
Result, when I go to the identity management to assign the refernce system (the default alias - SAP_DEV), I see it there.
What might be my issue? Does it mean I can't assign SAP reference if I am using UIDPW as logon method?
Please help me.

Hi Mahesh,
Thanks for the feedback. I am relatively new to EP...so please I won't mind if you can guide me on how to go about this.
This is what I did...
I chose System Administration > Permissions
In the PCD, I located my system with the alias, SAP_PRD
It opened up the permission assignment area.
Now I have these permissions set
Administrator - Full Control
Administrators - Full control
com.sap.caf.eu.gp.roles.superuser - Full control
Everyone (built in group) - Full control
Everyone (Everyone role)- Full control
super_admin_role - Owner
For all the above End User box is checked.
I can't find anyone end user group .
Once I pick UIDPW, the alias disapperars from the reference system list.
Please help.

BO 4.0 Issues for installing BOE and Explorer

Hi Experts,
I have installed BO 4.0 on OS Win 2008 R2 with defalut installation. I checked CMC and LaunchPad which worked well. Then I installed BO Explorer 4.0 with selected All on the same server. BO Explorer is able to lgon on , however CMC and BI Launchpad
are logged on with HTTP 500 error. The following is part of CMC error message:
HTTP Status 500 -
type Exception report
message
description The server encountered an internal error () that prevented it from fulfilling this request.
exception
java.lang.RuntimeException: java.lang.RuntimeException: javax.servlet.ServletException: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: com/businessobjects/sdk/plugin/desktop/infospace/internal/InfoSpaceMigrationFactory$SubInfoSpaceMigrationFactory
     com.businessobjects.http.servlet.internal.BundlePathAwareServiceHandler.serviceHelper(BundlePathAwareServiceHandler.java:254)
     com.businessobjects.http.servlet.internal.BundlePathAwareServiceHandler.service(BundlePathAwareServiceHandler.java:197)
     com.businessobjects.http.servlet.internal.ProxyServlet.service(ProxyServlet.java:248)
     javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:717)
     org.eclipse.equinox.servletbridge.BridgeServlet.service(BridgeServlet.java:174)
     javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:717)
     com.businessobjects.pinger.TimeoutManagerFilter.doFilter(TimeoutManagerFilter.java:159)
root cause
java.lang.RuntimeException: javax.servlet.ServletException: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: com/businessobjects/sdk/plugin/desktop/infospace/internal/InfoSpaceMigrationFactory$SubInfoSpaceMigrationFactory
Thanks for your help.
Chris

Hi Denis,
Before I created this message, I tried BOE XI 4.0 SP1 with Explorer 4.0 (i did not find SP1 for Explorer 4.0). The issue is the same as before. The following information is server information:
OS: Windows 2008 R2 (64 bit)
DB: MS SQL 2008 R2
Web Application: Tomcat 6.0.24
CPU: 16 (2.4GHZ)
RAM: 12GB
HardDisk: 700 G
No other applications are installed except MS Office.
Thanks for your reply. Any other clue?
Chris

Diagnosing an ASM space issue for a primary and a standby database instance with external redundancy.

I've received an alert from Enterprise manager saying "Disk Group DATA_SID requires rebalance because at least one disk
is low on space". My colleague who I would go to with this question is unavailable, so this is a learning opportunity
for me. So far google and Oracle documentation have provided lots of information, but nothing that answers my questions.
I've run the following query on both the primary and standby databases ASM instances:
select name, disk_number, sector_size,os_mb, total_mb, free_mb, redundancy from v$asm_disk;
On the primary I get 4810M Free space and 18431M Total Space
on the standby I get 1248M Free space and 18431M Total Space -- this is the one that complained via OEM
When I run the following query in the database instance:
select sum(bytes)/1024/1024 MB from dba_segments;
I get 3736.75M as a result.
My questions are:
1. Will OEM's suggestion to rebalance the disk actually help in this situation since the instance is set up with external redundancy?
2. If I've got 18G of space and only 3.7G of data, why is OEM complaining?
3. How can I reclaim what I presume is allocated but unused space in my problem disk group?
4. How can I determine what extra data the standby has that the primary doesn't since both have the same total space allocation, but different amounts of free space?

Thank you for the reply. That link is very good.
We are an 11.1 version of our database. Linus is OEL 5.6.
So, looking at the portion of the link that refers to 'Add Standby database and Instances to the OCR' - If we use SRVCTL to give the STANDBY the role of ‘physical_standby’ and the start option of ‘mount’, what effect will that have if the STANDBY becomes our PRIMARY?
Would these database settings need to be modified manually with SRVCTL each time?
We understand why the instance is not starting when the node is rebooted, we are looking for a best practice of how this is implemented.
Thank you.

Spares issue for big industry and MAM help?

Dear
While lookinng the present projects we have one ware house , all spares are stored at that location. Each maintenance jobs the required spares needs to be received from stores.
The problem is many places like power plant, utility area is fare from stores. So the users wrongly getting the spares thro MB21. So totally they are bypassing maint system .
Management is not interested to install the sub stores due to some reasons.
So in your experience what logic u did for very big plants, continious industry(textlies, utilit,steel plant, cement, power plant. paper)
Another options is MAM module how to help the taking the spares. Dont provide the study document link add your experience. MAM we can enter the sap with any mobile systems. But i need to take the consumables from main stores
Your idea pls

You should not post a consumption in SAP when all you are doing is moving from the main warehouse and bringing the spares to the maintenance area. Imagine if the spares are expensive are being brought from the warehouse and only being kept near the maintenance area. Probably they will be actually used only next month or perhaps even next quarter. But your books will unnecessarily show an expense in the current month. This way you are wasting the superb features of SAP.
My suggestion is create storage locations for the areas in which you might stock spares. And consume from those storage locations when u need. When you need to bring spares from the main warehouse to this maintenance area probably a transfer posting will suffice.
I don't see MAM being of any use to solve this problem.
P.S. I am giving you the solution and not the workaround. So depending on how much time you have you will have to outweigh one option.
Bala

Upcoming issues for secure boot and arch installs

I came across this rather worrying article indicating that when Microsoft starts approving hardware for Window 10 machines they may not allow secure boot to be turned off, and thereby make it very difficult for users to install arch on such a machine unless it can be booted using secure boot:
http://arstechnica.com/information-tech … a-reality/
I suppose at some point there will need to be a method of getting the appropriate certificates for arch to allow booting on machines using secure boot.

mcloaked wrote:
mychris wrote:
I've heard the systemd guys are working on integrating secure boot with systemd and gummiboot. So you might be able to sign everything yourself and secureboot your GNU/Linux/Systemd machine.
But currently I don't know anything about it and don't care about it. Like trilby said, if I'm not able to use a specific hardware I will not use it.
Sure I won't buy hardware that I can't install Arch on - but what is a potential problem is if OEMs are forced into only selling locked hardware if they wish to sell it with Windows on it in the future - that would give MS a monopoly position - and for laptops it is not so easy to find hardware that is free of MS apart from a limited range of laptops that have Ubuntu installed when supplied (and of course IOS and chromeos based machines). For desktops it is not too difficult to buy components or barebones systems that you can customise and install whatever you like on - but laptops don't generally fall into that option range. I do have to keep Windows for some tasks that it is close to impossible to do without Windows (like satnav updates for example) though it principle a VM could be used with Windows on it. It is a shame that for this kind of task there isn't a linux alternative that avoids Windows altogether! It would be nice to find barebones laptops that you can install any OS of choice on with none on the machine at the time of purchase.
I know this argument was discussed at length before Secure Boot appeared in the machines that are on the market now - and at the time I thought that the basic principle of not having one O/S manufacturer monopolising the market and excluding other O/Ses had been established and expected to continue along this path - but the news item indicates that a significant departure from that policy may now take place over the next year or two. Giving users the option to disable Secure Boot has no impact on the security of the Windows O/S on a particular machine unless the user actively disables it but that should remain the user's choice. The only reason to lock down the BIOS in this way is to attempt to close off competition to Windows. In a true free market there should be hardware that is not so locked - or at least have as much choice of hardware that is not incumbent on control from MS. There are worries that the BIOS is vulnerable to firmware hacking but that could in principle happen even if the Secure Boot option is designed to have no user control to turn it off. Maybe devices that will re-flash the BIOS with one that does allow Secure Boot will be developed - I seem to remember that some machines are "operated on" during delivery to customers in that kind of way to install firmware components that are not in place at manufacture - so that kind of technology already exists.
It will no doubt be interesting to see how this plays out over the next couple of years.
Edit: I guess if it comes to the crunch that people will start to play with the information such as at https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Un … ecure_Boot
I've tried using VB as a PXE client for Arch, and VB keeps blowing up. It's better if you just run it straight.

Itunes sync issues for windows 7 and Iphone 5

Itunes keeps telling me that it is unable to sync my library to my Iphone 5 because there is not enough free space. It also shows that there is no music/ films on my phone when there are. How can I fix this problem?

Hello Vinceagorn
Try turning off the sync feature to remove any music that might have made the transfer but does not show up then try the sync again. Check out he article below for more detailed instructions to sort out your issue.
iOS: "Not enough free space" alert when trying to sync
http://support.apple.com/kb/ts1503
Regards,
-Norm G.

PO issued for one vendor and GRPO another for the same

Hai members,
                  I have a problem, is it possible , to select a different vendor for the PO reaised for different vendor,
i.e.,
Po raised for 20 items against the Vendor   XYZ
But goods received
XYZ-   10
ABC-   10

Suda,
           At us the criteria is
One Vendor may have several companies
Once we produce order to him , he will dispatch the goods from either of the companies he had or from the both
but the PO purchase order comes from only in one name of the vendor
Suppose i had produced
100 Pcs order for Some Vendor -
   XYZ
But he may dispatch the same goods that we have ordered
from either of the comapnies he had i.e., XYZ, 123, ABC
but the PO is same
I think you got it Suda, please help me........ Thanks in advance

Lockbox issue for discount amount and incorrect reference

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for