Locked status of MIC while replacing

Hi
Guys, I am trying to replace an MIC version 1 with version 2 of that MIC, using T. Code QS27, when I selected the existing MIC line and press Start button to replace, the system gives message "First select the line" though I have selected. Also note that Replace Column show a Locked button.
How can I replace MIC or avoid that Locked button

You have to click on each line, (it will become highlighted once you do), you want the replacement to occur. Once they are highlighted you would then click the start button.
If the padlock appears on the line it is usually because the characteristic is unlocked in the inspection plan. These have to be manually updated. It can happed for a few other reasons which you'll get a list of if you click directly on the padlock.
FF

Similar Messages

Cursors throwing Unexpected lock status: 6

I am using a Berkeley DB instance and have a multithreaded clients each performing various types of operations on the database. In general there are three types of operations being performed, reads, writes (which use RMW locks), and (non-transactional) cursors. After some time my application dumps the following:
Unexpected lock status: 6
PANIC: Invalid argument
/usr/local/BerkeleyDB.4.7/lib/libdb_cxx-4.7.so(__os_stack+0x2b) [0xb7ef085f]
/usr/local/BerkeleyDB.4.7/lib/libdb_cxx-4.7.so(__os_abort+0x1d) [0xb7eecbb1]
/usr/local/BerkeleyDB.4.7/lib/libdb_cxx-4.7.so(__env_panic+0xa8) [0xb7e80b8e]
/usr/local/BerkeleyDB.4.7/lib/libdb_cxx-4.7.so(__lock_get_internal+0x1855) [0xb7e2e925]
/usr/local/BerkeleyDB.4.7/lib/libdb_cxx-4.7.so(__lock_vec+0x167) [0xb7e2bd3c]
/usr/local/BerkeleyDB.4.7/lib/libdb_cxx-4.7.so(__db_lget+0x45c) [0xb7e8bfe2]
/usr/local/BerkeleyDB.4.7/lib/libdb_cxx-4.7.so [0xb7d850a5]
/usr/local/BerkeleyDB.4.7/lib/libdb_cxx-4.7.so [0xb7d816ce]
/usr/local/BerkeleyDB.4.7/lib/libdb_cxx-4.7.so(__dbc_get+0x598) [0xb7e76a29]
/usr/local/BerkeleyDB.4.7/lib/libdb_cxx-4.7.so(__dbc_get_pp+0x11f) [0xb7e870ec]
/usr/local/BerkeleyDB.4.7/lib/libdb_cxx-4.7.so(_ZN3Dbc3getEP3DbtS1_j+0x3f) [0xb7d71feb]
...(non-berkeley db layers)...
/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0 [0xb7a2350f]
/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6(clone+0x5e) [0xb7b20a0e]
Aborted
In studying the core dumps and doing some testing this behavior only occurs when cursors are used, when those operations are removed the error no longer manifests itself so either the cursor is the issue, or how the cursors are interacting with other operations. Below is a sample of cursor code being run:
void run_cursor()
Dbc *curp = NULL;
int ret;
try
int i = 0;
Dbt key(&i,sizeof(int));
Dbt data(buffer, 0);
data.set_flags(DB_DBT_USERMEM);
data.set_ulen(MAX_BUFFER_SIZE);
db->cursor(NULL, &curp, 0);
while ((ret = curp->get(&key, &data, DB_NEXT)) == 0) {
//keep a list of all the keys in the db
keys.push_back(i);
if (ret != DB_NOTFOUND) {
cerr << "Cursor Error" << endl;
curp->close();
catch (DbException &ex) {
cout << ex.what() << endl;
if( curp != NULL )
curp->close();
I have tried wrapping the cursor in a transaction and it seems to worsen the issue (it happens more frequently). In all methods I am printing error messages when exceptions are thrown by the database (e.g. DbExceptions) and the program prints no errors so I do not believe it is a side effect of some other error. Here is the relevant parts of the case where is RMW lock is used:
void update()
DbTxn *txn = NULL;
try
env->txn_begin(NULL, &txn, 0);
int id;
Dbt key( &id, sizeof(int) );
Dbt value(buffer, 0);
value.set_flags(DB_DBT_USERMEM);
value.set_ulen(MAX_BUFFER_SIZE);
int err = db->get(txn, &key, &value, DB_RMW);
if( err == DB_NOTFOUND )
cerr << "Error trying to read key" << endl;
txn->abort(0);
return;
//code to modify the value here
db->put(txn, &key, &value, 0);
txn->commit(0);
} catch (DbDeadlockException &de) {
cout << de.what() << endl;
if( txn != NULL )
txn->abort();
Just in case it helps, here is the output of db_stat -CA on the database after it has crashed:
Default locking region information:
12     Last allocated locker ID
0x7fffffff     Current maximum unused locker ID
9     Number of lock modes
5000     Maximum number of locks possible
5000     Maximum number of lockers possible
1000     Maximum number of lock objects possible
1     Number of lock object partitions
6     Number of current locks
9     Maximum number of locks at any one time
4     Maximum number of locks in any one bucket
0     Maximum number of locks stolen by for an empty partition
0     Maximum number of locks stolen for any one partition
11     Number of current lockers
13     Maximum number of lockers at any one time
3     Number of current lock objects
9     Maximum number of lock objects at any one time
2     Maximum number of lock objects in any one bucket
0     Maximum number of objects stolen by for an empty partition
0     Maximum number of objects stolen for any one partition
3786734     Total number of locks requested
3786664     Total number of locks released
0     Total number of locks upgraded
1     Total number of locks downgraded
7089     Lock requests not available due to conflicts, for which we waited
61     Lock requests not available due to conflicts, for which we did not wait
0     Number of deadlocks
0     Lock timeout value
0     Number of locks that have timed out
1000000     Transaction timeout value
0     Number of transactions that have timed out
1MB 592KB     The size of the lock region
0     The number of partition locks that required waiting (0%)
0     The maximum number of times any partition lock was waited for (0%)
0     The number of object queue operations that required waiting (0%)
0     The number of locker allocations that required waiting (0%)
165     The number of region locks that required waiting (0%)
2     Maximum hash bucket length
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Lock REGINFO information:
Lock     Region type
5     Region ID
__db.005     Region name
0xb781b000     Original region address
0xb781b000     Region address
0xb781b0c0     Region primary address
0     Region maximum allocation
0     Region allocated
Region allocations: 11006 allocations, 0 failures, 0 frees, 1 longest
Allocations by power-of-two sizes:
1KB     11003
2KB     0
4KB     0
8KB     0
16KB     1
32KB     0
64KB     1
128KB     1
256KB     0
512KB     0
1024KB     0
REGION_JOIN_OK     Region flags
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Lock region parameters:
104     Lock region region mutex [165/7025066 0% 5979/3075574672]
8191     locker table size
1031     object table size
600     obj_off
62608     locker_off
0     need_dd
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Lock conflict matrix:
0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
0     0     1     0     1     0     1     0     1
0     1     1     1     1     1     1     1     1
0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
0     1     1     0     0     0     0     1     1
0     0     1     0     0     0     0     0     1
0     1     1     0     0     0     0     1     1
0     0     1     0     1     0     1     0     0
0     1     1     0     1     1     1     0     1
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Locks grouped by lockers:
Locker Mode Count Status ----------------- Object ---------------
4 dd= 9 locks held 1 write locks 0 pid/thread 5979/3080828608
4 READ 1 HELD ./db.db handle 0
5 dd= 8 locks held 0 write locks 0 pid/thread 5979/3072416656
6 dd= 7 locks held 0 write locks 0 pid/thread 5979/3073469328
7 dd= 6 locks held 0 write locks 0 pid/thread 5979/3073469328
8 dd= 5 locks held 0 write locks 0 pid/thread 5979/3073469328
9 dd= 4 locks held 0 write locks 0 pid/thread 5979/3072416656
a dd= 3 locks held 1 write locks 0 pid/thread 5979/3073469328
a READ 1 WAIT ./db.db page 21
a READ 2 HELD ./db.db page 20
b dd= 2 locks held 1 write locks 0 pid/thread 5979/3075574672
b READ 1 WAIT ./db.db page 21
b READ 2 HELD ./db.db page 20
c dd= 1 locks held 0 write locks 0 pid/thread 5979/3075574672
800054d9 dd= 0 locks held 1 write locks 1 pid/thread 5979/3074522000expires 05-05-12:41:36.048050000
800054d9 WRITE 2 HELD ./db.db page 21
800054da dd= 0 locks held 0 write locks 0 pid/thread 5979/3072416656
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Locks grouped by object:
Locker Mode Count Status ----------------- Object ---------------
800054d9 WRITE 2 HELD ./db.db page 21
a READ 1 WAIT ./db.db page 21
b READ 1 WAIT ./db.db page 21
a READ 2 HELD ./db.db page 20
b READ 2 HELD ./db.db page 20
4 READ 1 HELD ./db.db handle 0
The number of locks and lockers is somewhat low at 5,000 each, this was intentional since the same error occurs with larger numbers of locks/lockers it simply takes longer to occur. I have reviewed this output and nothing out of the ordinary seems to be occurring as far as I can tell.
Any additional insight would be appreciated.

Thanks to both of you for your suggestions.
I have still noticing the same issue with very similar output etc so I wont repost that. After running it some more I have started seeing another error message, it looks like its very similar and hopefully with make the issue more clear.
Here is the output of the error file:
TAS unlock failed: lock already unlocked
PANIC: Permission denied
/usr/local/BerkeleyDB.4.7/lib/libdb_cxx-4.7.so(__os_stack+0x2b) [0xb7ee585f]
/usr/local/BerkeleyDB.4.7/lib/libdb_cxx-4.7.so(__os_abort+0x1d) [0xb7ee1bb1]
/usr/local/BerkeleyDB.4.7/lib/libdb_cxx-4.7.so(__env_panic+0xa8) [0xb7e75b8e]
/usr/local/BerkeleyDB.4.7/lib/libdb_cxx-4.7.so(__db_tas_mutex_unlock+0xa5) [0xb7d72245]
/usr/local/BerkeleyDB.4.7/lib/libdb_cxx-4.7.so [0xb7e27d04]
/usr/local/BerkeleyDB.4.7/lib/libdb_cxx-4.7.so(__lock_detect+0x129) [0xb7e268bf]
/usr/local/BerkeleyDB.4.7/lib/libdb_cxx-4.7.so(__lock_get_internal+0x1434) [0xb7e23504]
/usr/local/BerkeleyDB.4.7/lib/libdb_cxx-4.7.so(__lock_vec+0x167) [0xb7e20d3c]
/usr/local/BerkeleyDB.4.7/lib/libdb_cxx-4.7.so(__db_lget+0x45c) [0xb7e80fe2]
/usr/local/BerkeleyDB.4.7/lib/libdb_cxx-4.7.so [0xb7d7a0a5]
/usr/local/BerkeleyDB.4.7/lib/libdb_cxx-4.7.so [0xb7d766ce]
/usr/local/BerkeleyDB.4.7/lib/libdb_cxx-4.7.so(__dbc_get+0x598) [0xb7e6ba29]
/usr/local/BerkeleyDB.4.7/lib/libdb_cxx-4.7.so(__dbc_get_pp+0x11f) [0xb7e7c0ec]
/usr/local/BerkeleyDB.4.7/lib/libdb_cxx-4.7.so(_ZN3Dbc3getEP3DbtS1_j+0x3f) [0xb7d66feb]
...(user code stack layers)...
/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0 [0xb79a950f]
/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6(clone+0x5e) [0xb7a9ea0e]
Here is the output of the waits for table:
Waiter:     Waiting on:
80002249/50:     957608
6/50:     80002249 957208
Waitsfor array
Waiter:     Waiting on:
8000224a/28:     957288
a/28:     8000224a 957608
Waitsfor array
Waiter:     Waiting on:
8000224c/22:     957608
6/22:     8000224c 957368
Waitsfor array
Waiter:     Waiting on:
8000224c/22:     957608
6/22:     8000224c 957368
4/22:     8000224c 957048
Waitsfor array
Waiter:     Waiting on:
8000224d/25:     957528
7/25:     8000224d 957608
Waitsfor array
Waiter:     Waiting on:
8000224d/25:     957528
7/25:     8000224d 957608
6/25:     8000224d 957208
Waitsfor array
Waiter:     Waiting on:
8000224d/25:     957528
7/25:     8000224d 957608
6/25:     8000224d 957208
4/25:     8000224d 957288
Waitsfor array
Waiter:     Waiting on:
80002251/10:     957048
a/10:     80002251 957128
Waitsfor array
Waiter:     Waiting on:
80002257/39:     80002254 957368
80002254/39:     957288
Waitsfor array
Waiter:     Waiting on:
80002258/14:     957048
4/14:     80002258 957608
Waitsfor array
Waiter:     Waiting on:
80002258/14:     957048
8/14:     80002258 957208
4/14:     80002258 957608
Waitsfor array
Waiter:     Waiting on:
80002259/39:     80002257 957448
80002258/14:     957048
80002257/39:     957368
8/14:     80002258 957208
4/14:     80002258 957608
Waitsfor array
Waiter:     Waiting on:
80002259/39:     957448
8/39:     80002259 957288
7/39:     80002259 957048
6/39:     80002259 957528
Waitsfor array
Waiter:     Waiting on:
80002259/0:     0
80002257/0:     0
Waitsfor array
Waiter:     Waiting on:
8000225a/40:     956968
7/40:     8000225a 956888
Waitsfor array
Waiter:     Waiting on:
8000225a/40:     956968
7/40:     8000225a 956888
4/40:     8000225a 957608
It looks like there is a similar pattern here at the end with the two entries waiting on zero ("80002259/0:     0 80002257/0:     0"), which is why I suspect its the same error just manifesting itself in a slightly different manner.
I am using lock detection, I currently have it set to use DB_LOCK_MAXLOCKS, I have tried others as well with not change in behavior.
Most of my transaction code takes the following form, so if the get is successful (the id exists) then the data is updated and written back to the database. If an exception is thrown then it is caught and the transaction is aborted. As far as I can tell this should not leave and transaction handles left open or anything along those lines as the error message suggests.
void do_txn()
DbTxn *txn = NULL;
try
db->txn_begin(NULL, &txn, 0);
Data d;
//does a db->get using the txn pointer and a DB_RMW lock
//returns do_get returns false if the id does not exist
bool success = do_get(id, &d, txn);
if( !success )
txn->abort();
return;
//update data as necessary
//does a db->put using the txn pointer
do_put(id, &d, txn);
txn->commit(0);
} catch (DbDeadlockException &de) {
cout << de.what() << endl;
if( txn != NULL )
txn->abort();
}

Updating caps lock and num lock status

I need to keep track of the status of the caps lock and num lock keys in a status bar of my frame.
I get the current status with a code like this
Toolkit toolkit = Toolkit.getDefaultToolkit();
numLockState = toolkit.getLockingKeyState(KeyEvent.VK_NUM_LOCK);
capsLockState = toolkit.getLockingKeyState(KeyEvent.VK_CAPS_LOCK);
fireChangeEvent();
where fireChangeEvent() updates a label in the status bar. The code is invoked when any of the caps lock and num lock keys are pressed (while the window has the focus) and when the window is activated. This code works while the window has the focus (i.e. the status of the keys if correctly tracked). It does not work correctly when the window is activated.
Specifically the following scenario fails:
- The window has focus and the state of the keys if correctly reported by the code above (say caps lock up, num lock
up);
- The window loses focus, i.e., another (non java) window gains the focus;
- The user presses any of the two keys (say the caps lock key);
- The window regains focus.
When the latter event happens the code above is invoked (as a consequence of the window being activated) but it continues to report the status of the keys at the time the focus was lost by the window (caps lock up, num lock up).
It seems that the toolkit does not automatically updates its internal status if a key is pressed when the java window does not have the focus. If I press the caps lock key (so that it returns to the up state) after the window has regained focus the status is updated and the new state is correctly reported. I need to manually realign the status by pressing the keys to have them correctly reported by the toolkit.
Some ideas on how to have correct key status even after the window looses the focus?
Thanks.

Specifically the following scenario fails:
- The window has focus and the state of the keys if correctly reported by the code above (say caps lock up, num lock
up);
- The window loses focus, i.e., another (non java) window gains the focus;
- The user presses any of the two keys (say the caps lock key);
- The window regains focus.
When the latter event happens the code above is invoked (as a consequence of the window being activated) but it continues to report the status of the keys at the time the focus was lost by the window (caps lock up, num lock up).sorry! i tried this in a JFrame windowActivated() and i got the desired result it breaks your senario.
the only is though it is not sensing the keyStrokes but if window looses focus because of another window gains focus it changes the values when it get focus next by ne means.
Provide a short executable code might be the problem lies there.

Can you lock out the Ipad while it is traveling down the road?

I would like to put an Ipad in my trucks, but I can't trust the drivers to not use it while they are driving. Is there a way to lock out the Ipad while the vehicle is moving?

Perhaps a Workstation Associated app that just pushed an invalid value for the
GINA.DLL
Either Remote Regedit or another Force-Run app could restore this to a correct
value.
Needs testing to make sure you can fix what you break, but this would lead
everything intact.
Marcus Breiden wrote:
> On Mon, 23 May 2005 19:05:23 GMT, [email protected] wrote:
>
> > I am not sure how this can be performed. We currently do something
> > similar with NEW XP PCs that have no local user accounts on them yet
> > (basically we enable login restrictions under the DLU policy - if the
> > workstation can't create a local user account for the user, they can't
> > log into the network or the PC). That solution would not work in this
> > case though since the local accounts would already be created on the PC.
>
> hmmm.... I would create an application and associate it to the wks, make it
> force run..
>
> in that app remove / or change the Tree for the workstation manager... this
> will disable all policy management (also DLU)...
>
> in case your accounts are locally on that box you would have to do some
> more stuff to get around your problem...
> --
>
> Marcus Breiden
>
> Please change -- to - to mail me.
> The content of this mail is my private and personal opinion.
> http://www.edu-magic.net
Craig Wilson
CNE3, 4, 5 - MCSE - CCNA
NSC Sysop (http://support.novell.com/forums/)
Tech Writer - http://www.ithowto.com
(I Peter 4:10)

How to see lock status of a table ?

Hi,
My question is : how to see the lock status of a table ?
and how to lock a table except run the FM ENQUEUE_TABLENAME?
Is there any transcation that can lock a table ?
thx in advance.

Hi Vincent
Via transaction SM12 we can check the lock entries at a particular point of time...
Kind Regards
Eswar

Unable to select Quantitative data during creation of MIC while using Clas

*Unable to select Quantitative data during creation of MIC while using Class characterstics*
Dear All,
I want to transfer MIC Result recording to Batch class.
For that, i am trying to create MIC & giving class characteristic name in QS21, and then under control data, I am unable to select, Quantitative. By default system is selecting Qualitative. But I want to create that MIC as Quantitative.
Is there any setting for this?
Please help...
Thanks in advance
Edited by: Sitarami Reddy Kummeta on Nov 30, 2009 6:44 PM

Hi
to have master inspection characteristic quantitative ,the class characteristic must be of format "NUM":
Regards
Sujit

How to check lock status of field in current document?

Hi,
How to check the status of field in current document(master agreement), that is whether its locked or not.
I locked "Publish to Supplier" checkbox after MA is saved first time. Now, I want to check the status whether this field is locked or not in the same document.
IsLockOwner( ) is not returning the correct value. Its not giving the current document field lock status.
Is there any way to get current document field status?
Thanks,
Saloni

Hi,
If I understand correctly, your requirement is to get the value of this field "Publish to Supplier on". It can be achieved by writing the below:
isVendorVisible = doc.getExtensionField("VENDOR_VISIBLE").get();
Meaning, if the box is checked, it will return a value = true and if not then false.
Hope this helps,
Regards,
Vikram Shukla

DMS - locked status / how to limit security access

I have a couple issues with a security profile (customer service) we have defined for DMS. This profile is set up that when the document info record is in a "released" status, the customer service person has edit (CV02N) access. When in an "on hold" status, the customer service person does not have edit (CV02N) access. Further, the "Released" status is a "locked" status.
1) The Object links appears to be open for edit, regardless of whether or not we have the status "locked".
Also, the deletion indicator can be changed when in locked status. I am looking for all fields to be locked except for the status field. Customer Service should only be able to change status from "released" to "on hold", and should not be able to change anything else. Any suggestions on how to do this?.
2) The intention is that the customer service person can use CV02N to change a document from "released" status to "on hold". This is the ONLY change customer service should be able to make. However, once the status changes from "released" to "on hold", it seems there is an authorization check missing..... meaning now the customer service person is in "on hold" status and they should not be able to edit anything, but apparently they still have the CV02N access from the "released" status, and they can now also change any other fields, update object links and attachments before they save the document. What am I missing?
Any help would be greatly appreciated!!

Hi,
U can use following authorization objects to resrticts the document access
1.C_DRAD_OBJ - Create/Change/Display/Delete Objec
here in activity field dont check delete, change option, so that user can not change, delete existing object links
2. C_DRAW_TCD - Authorization for document activit
here in activity field dont check delete option, so that user can not mark DIR for deletion.
award points if useful
Regards
sham

Screen with the error "S.M.A.R.T. Status BAD, Backup and Replace" Press F1 to Resum - Q180

Hello!
always at start up i have a screen with the error "S.M.A.R.T. Status BAD, Backup and Replace" Press F1 to Resum - Q180
did anyone know how to solve
i have changed the batterie to but no sucess
thx
Peter
Solved!
Go to Solution.

smart is telling you that your hdd is failing it may still work but for how long who knows
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S.M.A.R.T.
Thx dave
yoga 2, lenovo b540
3 custom gaming pc systems

Making certain DIR fields editable even when the DIR is in locked status(S)

Is it possible to make certain fields in the DIR editable even though the DIR status is locked (S)?
I guess it can't be done through customising. We've made a suggestion that the users should change the status so that the document will become editable again.
But they would like to edit certain fields, i.e. description and lab/office only. The rest of the fields and data should remain locked. Can this be achieved through a user-exit somehow?
Regards,
Kenneth

Dear Kenneth,
as far as I know this is not working because due to the locked status type the field are disabled by the system. So to avoid this the whole checking logic would have to be changed.
Best regards,
Christoph

Getting status as ERROR while instantiating Business Object in work flow?

Hi,
Getting status as ERROR while instantiating Business Object in work flow.
How to rectify it.
Tahnks in Advance.
Moderator message: please have a look at the dedicated Workflow forum on SCN.
Edited by: Thomas Zloch on Jan 19, 2012

Hi,
Go to SWDD and create a new workflow. This workflow will have two steps. This is just for test purpose so we are not going to define any triggering event etc. First step will instantiate (creating a runtime object) a business object and second step will use that runtime object to execute one of its method. We know that to instantiate any BO we need the object key to be passed. Key uniquely identifies a runtime instance of Business Object (henceforth we will refer it as BO or business object interchangeably).
use Business Object SYSTEM and method GENERICINSTANTIATE to instantiate any Business Object in workflow

HT4085 how to lock the tauch screen with some password or dots like android to prevent misuse. And also screen lock to prevent interruption while watching movie reading books etc.

how to lock the tauch screen with some password or dots like android to prevent misuse. And also screen lock to prevent interruption while watching movie reading books etc.

You can set a passcode to be requied to unlock the iPad via Settings > General > Passcode Lock. In terms of locking the actual screen whilst using an app, then that isn't currently possible, but with iOS 6 in the Autumn there will be a new 'accessibility' feature (from here) which will allow you :
... to limit an iOS device to one app by disabling the Home button, as well as restrict touch input on certain areas of the screen

Opening a new tab in safari opens an untitled tab while replacing the existing tab with top sites

When I open a new tab in safari, it opens an untitled tab while replacing the existing tab with top. Then if I have other tabs open, the website url of the page I was on before I opened the untitled tab freezes and is shown on each other tab.
How can i fix this problem? It is starting to occur with increasing frequency.

I had the same problem and I suspect you are using Glims. I uninstalled Glims and voila, problem gone. I reinstalled Glims and the problem returned.
Link to Glims uninstaller for those who have this problem http://www.MacHangout.com/dwnlds/Glims-UnInstall.dmg.zip
I'll report the bug and hope they fix it soon, I like Glims.

Mac Pro running OS x Lion 10.7.5 sometimes locks the network password while in sleep mode.

Mac Pro running OS x Lion 10.7.5 sometimes locks the network password while in sleep mode. We have tried resetting the password in AD and locally using keychain but the problem reoccurs. Any suggestions would be great.

Also I unlocked the user account at 9:10am and by 11:10am it locked again. The user was away from his desk in a meeting.

What does "Locked" status really mean in FPGA Timekeeper

The help says, "FPGA Timekeeper locked is TRUE if the FPGA Timekeeper has locked on to and is tracking the given time reference."
That's not very specific.
- The Timekeeper is only "tracking the given time reference" when "Sync Time.vi" is called by the code, right? Otherwise isn't it just predicting time base on the FPGA clock cycle, and apparently some filtering, gain and interpolation? That wouldn't really be tracking the time reference.
- Is the Timekeeper checking the interval at which Sync Time.vi is called?
- Is it comparing the offset of the two time values input to Sync Time.vi to its internal prediction?
- Is it making some judgement after a series of Sync Time.vi calls (how many?) that it has figured out the relative variations between the time reference and the FPGA clock? How does it make that judgement?
- If a long time passes between Sync Time.vi calls does it decide it has lost its lock?
- Does calling Time Synce too frequently or too infrequently contribute to not achieving locked status, or to losing it?
Thanks for the help! I love the idea of the FPGA Timekeeper but I don't know how to interpret the lock. I can get the offset from the time reference, but what I'd really love to know is the size of the error when calling Time Synce.vi.

Hello Matt_Dennie,
The article below indicates that when using the FPGA Timekeeper with NI-9467 hardware, you will be able to correlate absolute time with system events at an accuracy of around 100 ns.
How Do I Use the FPGA Timekeeper to Synchronize Data with the NI 9467 GPS Module?:
http://ae.natinst.com/public.nsf/web/searchinternal/efdc35727d4f2cc086257a0700693003?OpenDocument
FPGA Timekeeper 1.1b0 GetStatus.vi:
http://forums.ni.com/t5/LabVIEW/FPGA-Timekeeper-1-1b0-GetStatus-vi-Locked-indicator-never-goes/td-p/...
The example VI for FPGA Timekeeper explains (briefly) the process used for synchronization (Synchronize to GPS – cRIO.lvproj).
j_bou

Locked status of MIC while replacing

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for