Logical components for ERP and ERP EnhP 3

Hello,
We have a landscape or ECC 6.0 Systems created in the SMSY. Those systems were linked to a new logical component Z_ERP60 under product ERP 6.0. Then we used that logical component in all the projects.
Later on, we upgrade ECC 6.0 to EnhP 3. So, we went to the SMSY transaction, to the infrastructure components--systems and add new product versions to the existent system.
However, the logical component is defined as valid only for the original product ERP 6.0, and not to the new ERP 6.0 EhP3. When we go to SOLAR01 transaction we still see that processes from BPR that belongs to EhP3 are greyed.
We want to know which is the best practice to handle this request, whether we create a new logical component associated to the product ehp3, Z_ERP60_EHP and then replace all the projects with the new component, or is there any other alternative.
I appreciate your inputs.
Regards
Esteban Hartzstein

Many thanks for your answer. The attachment is related to whether ERP EhP is available as a product in Solution Manager. We are in SolMan EhP1 (SP 18), so we already have the product available. However my concern is that we need to redefine the logical component. Logical component belongs to one single product, being ERP 6.0 or ERP 6.0 EhP. So, in our case we need to create a new logical component with the new ERP 6.0 EhP and then re-atach all the individual systems to the new logical compoent. Then we need to replace in all the projects withe the new logical component. Is there any alternative to deal with this problem of redefintion of logical components??
Regards
ESteban Hartzstein

Similar Messages

ChaRM:Logical Components for Projects

Hi Experts,
I have done ChaRM config and i am about to create logical components for the project Project.
I have below two questions please help.
While creating a logical component when i have multiple clients in DEV, QAS and PRD how to proceed and second question is about RFC Users in satellite systems.
1) My ECC landscape have DEV ->100, 200, 300, 400, QAS-> 100, 200, 300, PRD-> 100, 200 with multiple clients.
So while creating logical component do i need mention all clients in the logical component or its enough if i mention DEV->100, QAS->100, PRD->100 ?
If i mention only one client in logical component how transports will move to other clients in DEV, QAS and PRD. Please help.
2) Second question is do we need to create READ, TMW, back rfc users in all clients for DEV, QAS and PRD for above ECC landscape ?
Please help for above question.
Regards
Latha

Hi,
So while creating logical component do i need mention all clients in the logical component or its enough if i mention DEV->100, QAS->100, PRD->100 ?
Yes, you can have this TMS track defined and use SCC1 for performing imports within the system (like QAS 100 to QAS 200 ). Or use the Tranport Target Group option so that your TR is visible in import queue of all system. More info Extended Transport Control (SAP Library - BC Change and Transport Organizer)
2) Second question is do we need to create READ, TMW, back rfc users in all clients for DEV, QAS and PRD for above ECC landscape ?
Yes, you need RFCs b/w your working client (100 ) and 000 client of domain controller. Not for all clients.
Regards,
Vivek

2 Logical Components for 1 Business Process Step

Hello All,
I'm looking for a way to assign in SolMan --> transaction Solar01 - Tab Structure - Business Process Step, 2 logical components for 1 business step. When creating the business step I have to assign 1 specific logical component to this step. Once I have done this I can only select the chosen logical component ffor SAP Transactions, configuration object etc.. As my business step is running on 2 different systems I need to find a way to link transactions etc. in the step to the different systems. Is there any way to change this for the Level 3 elements, like it is for level 2 (business processes) where I can choose in the different tabs between all the logical components?
Thanks in advance
Ramó

I've seen people use some absolute craziness to get more than three levels. The most extreme being using multiple projects at the highest level (i.e. a project for PTP Accounts Payable). Don't go there.
I personally like to have 1 transaction per process step. Don't use the transaction tab as another process level, use it to better describe the process step (like all the other tabs are uses). It results in a better understanding of the system as you go forward. To do that I make teams break up things they think are one step (this can take some arm twisting, so hit the gym and maybe take a few judo classes).
This allows you to use SolMan in more powerful ways. For instance, if you attach development objects to a step with 5 transactions, you cannot tell which transaction is modified by the development object. However, one transaction per node provides you this link. There are other examples, but basically the "where used" button becomes very useful when you have 1 transaction per node.
Maybe you could provide a specific example of your process and we can think of a better way to collapse it.
Such as:
- PTP Non-Merchandise Purchasing
-- Expense Purchasing
--- Create Purchase Requisition
--- Create Purchase Order (Assign Vendor & Price)
--- Send to Vendor
--- Post Goods Receipt
--- Perform LIV
--- Process Payment
Some companies have 6 level processes already defined in models and putting it into SolMan can be a pain for sure. Your naming convention is usually the best route.
regards,
Jason
The system role and template work around doesn't apply to your situation.

I had a code to get logics pro for free and after it installed its asking me for a serial number does anyone know what to do from here.

I had a code to get logics pro for free and after it installed its asking me for a serial number but it never gave me one to put in, it just started downloading and then asked me. Does anyone know what to do from here.

I really don't think that is anywhere near on track.
Most likely the trial version was installed earlier, is that correct?

Using Logic sounds for input and playback in Sibeius

Hi. I've been running Sibelius and Logic on different PC's, and just for fun, I installed Sibelius on my Mac today. I used my Master Keyboard to play in a test song.
So now I'm wondering whether I can use Logic sounds for inputtting AND for playback. Since I also have VSL on the mac, I don't really want to install the GPO which I use on my Pc with Sibelius.
Thanks, Kay.

Have you think using IAC ? I.e you set it as a "Midi Out" port in Sibelius so the midi will carry the data to Logic and trigger its Instruments via the virtual midi cables ( the IAC bus ).
Take care to select Software Instruments tracks only. If you select some track which use say Multi, Standard or Mapped Insr. ( which port is set to IAC by chance ) you will cause midi feedback and crash the Logic app.
!http://img59.imageshack.us/img59/4967/aglogo45.gif! [www.audiogrocery.com|http://www.audiogrocery.com]

Understanding and using Logical Components for Managed System configuration

Experts.....
I am embarking on a fresh installation of SolMan 7 EhP1 SPS25 and after a few bugs along the way, I am finally nearing the end of including the first Managed System. Somewhat related to {forum:id=10293771] I am hoping I can get some advice, but specifically with regards to Logical Components.
General question - I have a slide from SAP that shows a picture from Product->System->Instance->Logical System (client)->Logical Component. I am confused because it shows that Client 100 of a given ABAP system could be assigned to Logical Component A, whereas Client 200 of the same system could be assigned to Logical Component B. This seems wrong to me?
I am at the last step of the managed systems configuration wizard : "create logical components" and only want to ensure that I set things up to hopefully ensure that later usages (Maintenance Optimizer, etc) will handle things correctly!!!
- Our SAP landscape is not very complex
1. only ERP and EP (Dev/Test/Prod).
2. We are utilizing HR Self Service (XSS).
3. The ERP ABAP systems are on Netweaver 7.01.
4. EhP4 has been installed, however we only activated the HCM business functions. Therefore SAP_HR is on 604 whereas SAP_APPL is on 600. I think this might be driving some of the confusion in SMSY
For the DEV ABAP system I am trying to configure:
1. The system is showing up in two products : "SAP ERP" and "SAP ERP Enhancement Package" with the header data for both showing "EHP4 FOR SAP ERP 6.0 / NW7.01" and "SAP ERP 6.0"
2. Under "SAP ERP" the "product instance selection" shows only "SAP NW - Adobe Docu. Service" and "SAP ECC Server" as relevant
3. Under ""SAP ERP Enhancement Package" the "product instance selection" shows only "Human Capital Mgmt" as relevant by default. I manually flagged the development portal system as "relevant" for "SAP XSS (Self Services)"
4. The RCA DBA Cockpit system is complaining "No data available for extractor activation. Please check product mapping and Software Components in SMSY"
5. In the Managed System wizard, there is no logical component for any of the "EHP4 FOR SAP ERP 6.0 / NW7.01" selections
From what I can tell, I think this is correct:
1. Create a Z_EHP4 logical component and assign the DEV/QAS/PRD systems to them
2. Also assign the DEV/QAS/PRD to the existing SAP logical component "SAP ERP ECC SERVER"???
3. For the Solutions, my plan is to create
a. Non-Production ERP : with the dev/test erp/ep systems, but test system as the leading system
b. Production ERP with the prod erp/ep systems only
Thanks for any advice/guidance to help me avoid future problems!!
Edited by: Eric Poellinger on Jun 15, 2011 6:32 PM

General question - I have a slide from SAP that shows a picture from Product->System->Instance->Logical System (client)->Logical Component. I am confused because it shows that Client 100 of a given ABAP system could be assigned to Logical Component A, whereas Client 200 of the same system could be assigned to Logical Component B. This seems wrong to me?
Client 100 could be assigned to any number of logical components, client 200 could be assigned to those same ones or none of them. A logical component is just a grouping of systems used to accomplish some task in SolMan.
For example with ChaRM you could have 2 logical components.
ZCHARM_DEV development (100) -> QA (200) -> prod (300)
ZCHARM_SEC security (900) -> QA (200) -> prod(300)
One is used to show the path for moving development changes to prod, the other for security changes. 200 belongs to both, but 100 only to one.
Set them up in whatever way meets you needs. It looks like for you, you could just use the default one and assign your clients to the various system roles. Not all functionality in SolMan uses the logical components though.

GA dates for nw2004s and erp 2005

I have been looking all over the SMP for the proposed GAA dates for NW2004s and ERP2005. Does any one know where to find these?

Hi,
No offical date has been set. The offical SAP response is Q2 2006 with a Target Completion date of May 2006.
you can check for updates on the Ramp-up home page: http://service.sap.com/rampup
Cheers,
Mike.

Logical Components for a project

Hi,
We have ECC6.0 on which we have applied the Enhancement Package 2.0.
While trying to create a project in solution manager for the Business Sceario we selected it is requiring Logical component for SAP ERP Enhance Package.
While trying to create the SAP ERP Enhance Package logical component we are not able to find any systems to attach under that even though we have maintained installed product versions as both SAP ECC / SAP ERP ENHANCE PACKAGE 2005.2. in the system defintion of our development system.
We tried to put SAP ERP ENHANCE PACKAGE 2005.2 as leading product version even then we are not able to pickup that system under the SAP Enhance package Logical component.
Please suggest.
Thanks & Regards
Mrutyunjay

Hi,
In SMSY under landscape components select your system and go to Header Data Tab. Click on Installed Product version. Then select the check box Free Product/Select product Version.
Then you can find your product there. This will solve your problem.
Feel free to revert back.
--Ragu

How to set up logical components for ChaRM?

Hi,
we do have the following system landscape. One DEV and two separate QA and PROD systems.
DEV->
>QA1 -> PROD1
>QA2 -> PROD2
For these we want to transport parallel from DEV to QA1/QA2 and then parallel to PROD1/PROD2 via ChaRM.
My questions are:
1) Do I have to set up one or two logical components?
2) How do I have to set up the logical component exactly?
Thanks.
Regards,
Alex
Edited by: Alexander Barth on Jul 20, 2009 4:02 PM
Layout changed
Edited by: Alexander Barth on Jul 20, 2009 4:03 PM

Hi,
Chk the below link .
https://websmp202.sap-ag.de/~sapdownload/011000358700000657692007E/ECTS_CHARM_SP12.PDF
Thx,
Waseem.

Logical systems for modeldata and RFC metadata

Hi All,
I want to know how I can display the my own created logical system names under the drop-down menu when i have to select the logical system names for modeldata and rfc metadata. I don't want to them to be written instead i want them to be one of the options in the drop down menu, as we have them in the FLIGHT_LIST_INIT example found in the sample applications and examples.
Thanks in advance
Srikant

Hi,
While creating SLD for your R/3 systems give the desired name of wht u want instead of logical name.
For configuring the same refer the link below :-
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2004/helpdata/en/29/e0b75c2b7d40c5bfbda82e905b701c/frameset.htm
Regards,
guru

How to create logical link for report and make that available in webui

Hi All,
Please mention the steps to creae logical link for standard report(BI) or customized report and assiging it to work center,
Thanks,
priya

There is a good guide available from SAP: service.sap.com/crm-inst
It goes into most details you would want to know on including BI reports.
The path is SAP CRM > SAP CRM 2007 > CRM WebClient UI
cheers Carsten

Is there any library with new components for download and put into multisim? I need ISO124 and I don't know how to make it...

People, I am not experient on Multisim and I'd need help to make one component. First, is there any library or something for me to download components that are necessary and are not there? If there isn't, can someone help me to find ISO 124 (isolation amplifier) for simulation and PCI??
Thank You!

Leocechet,
The ISO 124 from Burr Brown (now part of TI) is one of my favorite ICs (although noisy)... I would check on the TI website and if no luck do a general google search to see if there is anything similar out there for SPICE models.
If I remember correctly the ISO124 uses a proprietary capacitive isolation barrier (mod/demod across barrier). The signal chain and performance of the ISO 124 may be difficult to mimic with a standard opamp model, but you can try as a start.
If creating my own I would use a standard opamp model and then use a voltage controlled source to model the isolation barrier (again it wouldn't be that sophisticated but you could possibly add to it).
Hopefully that will get you started. If you find a model and need help in importing it let us know.
Regards,
Pat N

Should i use Logic Express for Mixing and Mastering?

recording an LP with GarageBand. are express and pro very close in what they offer ? express good enough for mixing and matering an LP? would like to keeps costs down. thanks SJM

It can be done, but you will need to do a lot of reading and make many mixes to get it down. Mastering is not something you can learn overnight. It'll take you many hours of trial and error just to get something that is OK. A pro mastering engineer has years of experience and thousands of dollars worth of high quality gear. With a lot of practice, you can get something fairly decent, but it won't be like a real pro job would be.
As Hangtime suggested in the GB forum, do a google search and you'll get a lot of sites with articles on the subject of mixing and mastering.

DB Instances for SLM and ERP

Hello,
I want to install SAP Solution Manager 4.0 and SAP ERP 2005 on the same host - 64bit machine, no productive environment.
Should i use the "multiple components in one database" option or should i give each system an own instance?
If i choose the second option does the SAPinst program install the whole maxdb software twice or does it just setup a second instance?
Thanks a lot in advance,
Martin

The MaxDB software has independent parts which are shared and dependent parts which are installed for each instance separately.
I would use the second approach if you really want to install Solman on the same box. I highly recommend using a separate machine for this, SolMan is a resource hog and will need at least 6 GB of memory that will be missed by your ERP system.
Markus

Multiple logical components for a single step in Business Process Structure

Question 2 of 3:
I'd like to hear about how other people have handled Portals transactions and similar items. I.e. when building the Business Blueprint or Business Process Structure, what if a single transaction runs on more than one product or logical component? Solution Manager only allows you to assign one logical component to a process step and transaction in the Business Blueprint Structure. This isn't the ideal solution, since you lose the linear affect of the what transactions take place for the step.
Your insights and opinions are appreciated.
Regards,
Marcel

Hi Marcel,
an ABAP transaction can only run or at least be started on one single system. A portal transaction can be assigned using a URL. This doesn't need any logical component.
Regards
Andreas

Logical components for ERP and ERP EnhP 3

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for