Looking Server-based Solution Compatible with Acrobat 7.0

I need to merge XFDF and PDF files on a server and return a PDF file. The server solution must be compatible with Acrobat 7.0 because we use rich-text fields in our XFDF that rely on the xfa:spec=2.1.0. So far, the server-based products we've tried have not worked because they are based on Acrobat 6.0 (which is compatible with xfa:spec=2.0.x, I believe).
Please help! It would be great just to know definitively there's nothing out there, if that is the case.
Regards,
Lori

Maybe you want to take a look at these:
http://partners.adobe.com/public/developer/livecycle/forms/devcenter.html
http://partners.adobe.com/public/developer/livecycle/topic_xpaaj.html
Evangelos

Similar Messages

FM 9 compatible with Acrobat 8?

I'm evaluating a trial version of FM9.
I already had Acrobat Standard 8 installed, so I skipped the PDF option of the FM9 install based on past experience with FrameMaker's built-in partial Acrobat distribution trashing Acrobat Proper.
FM9 (as noted in some previous topics here) would not save as PDF. I repaired Acrobat 8, no change. So as to continue with the evaluation, I installed a trial of Acrobat 9, but I don't want to buy it as it has no new features I need.
So is there a way to get FM9's Save as PDF feature to recognize and use Acrobat 8?
By the way, any Adobe types who are following this, your proprietary download manager is horribly buggy and slow, you should dump it. Also, the Acrobat 9 installer is preposterously slow (took overnight), you should switch to whatever you're using for FrameMaker 9, which worked OK.

Some correlation between FrameMaker and Distiller may be useful.
Some snippets from Adobe TechNotes.
"You can create PDF files in Adobe FrameMaker by saving a FrameMaker document as a PDF file or by printing to the Adobe PDF printer. Both methods use Adobe Acrobat Distiller..."
and
"Make sure that you use a version of Acrobat Distiller that is compatible with FrameMaker."
FrameMaker 8.0.4 (p277) is compatible with Acrobat 9 .
FrameMaker 8.0 is compatible with Acrobat Distiller 8.0.x.
FrameMaker 7.2 is compatible with Acrobat Distiller 7.0.
FrameMaker 7.1p116 is compatible with either Acrobat Distiller 6.0 or 7.0.
FrameMaker 7.1b023 and 7.1p114 are compatible with Acrobat Distiller 6.0.
FrameMaker 7 shipped with Distiller 5.05
FrameMaker 6 shipped with Distiller 4.05
And, for FM 9.x we got/have Distiller 9.x
Be well...

Error 2000 - The server is not compatible with this deployment client

I'm getting an error trying to deploy a composite. It works for everyone else on the team, and our configurations are the same (as far as we can tell). We've compared JDev version info.
Any idea what I can try? Thank you.
[12:57:48 PM] ---- Deployment started. ----
[12:57:48 PM] Target platform is (Weblogic 10.3).
[12:57:48 PM] Running dependency analysis...
[12:57:48 PM] Building...
[12:58:05 PM] Deploying profile...
[12:58:06 PM] Wrote Archive Module to C:\pkgs\svn\mdm\trunk\src\DRM WDK Source Code\Workflows\DrmRequestWorkflowSelection\deploy\sca_DrmRequestWorkflowSelectionComposite_rev3.0.jar
[12:58:06 PM] Deploying sca_DrmRequestWorkflowSelectionComposite_rev3.0.jar to partition "default" on server soa_server1 [http://10.22.2.40:8001]
[12:58:06 PM] Processing sar=/C:/pkgs/svn/mdm/trunk/src/DRM WDK Source Code/Workflows/DrmRequestWorkflowSelection/deploy/sca_DrmRequestWorkflowSelectionComposite_rev3.0.jar
[12:58:06 PM] Adding sar file - C:\pkgs\svn\mdm\trunk\src\DRM WDK Source Code\Workflows\DrmRequestWorkflowSelection\deploy\sca_DrmRequestWorkflowSelectionComposite_rev3.0.jar
[12:58:06 PM] Preparing to send HTTP request for deployment
[12:58:06 PM] Creating HTTP connection to host:10.22.2.40, port:8001
[12:58:06 PM] Sending internal deployment descriptor
[12:58:06 PM] Sending archive - sca_DrmRequestWorkflowSelectionComposite_rev3.0.jar
[12:58:07 PM] Error deploying archive sca_DrmRequestWorkflowSelectionComposite_rev3.0.jar to partition "default" on server soa_server1 [http://10.22.2.40:8001]
*[12:58:07 PM] HTTP error code returned [2000]*
*[12:58:07 PM] Error message from server:*
The server is not compatible with this deployment client: please verify that the server is a SOA managed server and that its version is supported by this deployment client
[12:58:07 PM] Check server log for more details.
[12:58:07 PM] Error deploying archive sca_DrmRequestWorkflowSelectionComposite_rev3.0.jar to partition "default" on server soa_server1 [http://10.22.2.40:8001]
[12:58:07 PM] #### Deployment incomplete. ####
[12:58:07 PM] Error deploying archive file:/C:/pkgs/svn/mdm/trunk/src/DRM WDK Source Code/Workflows/DrmRequestWorkflowSelection/deploy/sca_DrmRequestWorkflowSelectionComposite_rev3.0.jar
(oracle.tip.tools.ide.fabric.deploy.common.SOARemoteDeployer)
Edited by: J Keller on Jun 6, 2013 8:03 AM

Can anyone reply plz???

PDF Documents compatible with Acrobat Reader 5.0

Which version (Standard, Pro or Ext Pro) of Adobe Acrobat 9.0 family should I buy to create PDF documents compatible with Acrobat Reader 5.0 ????
Is it possible to create PDF files from HTML and navigate through the links ????
Thank you.

Thank you for your answer.
Related to my first question (compatibility with Acrobat Reader 5.0), how should I save the PDF created ???? Saving the PDF in Acrobat Pro 9.0 with standard save option makes the document not readable by Acrobat Reader 5.0.
Should I save the document as PDF/A, PDF/X or any other subset ????? If so, I'm not sure if they are included in the Standard.
Thank you in advance.

Is FrameMaker 9 compatible with Acrobat XI?

We have the Tech Comms Suite 2 that comes with FrameMaker 9. We are slowly getting away from FrameMaker but still have some documents that we maintain with Frame. However, we would like to upgrade Acrobat to XI. Does anyone know if Acrobat XI is compatible with FrameMaker 9? We are on Windows 7...if that helps.

Too bad about moving away from Frame, since it's steadily improving.
But yes, the two apsa are compatible. Acrobat is basically a "printer" that
processes whatever you send it.
The integration features built into the TCS components may not work well
because they expect whatever version of Acrobat shipped with it, but
producing PDFs with all the bells and whistles shouldn't be a problem.
Art Campbell
          [email protected]
"... In my opinion, there's nothing in this world beats a '52 Vincent and
a redheaded girl." -- Richard Thompson
                                                      No disclaimers apply.
                                                               DoD 358
I support www.TheGrotonLine.com, hyperlocal news for Groton MA.

Is Sun Java Web Server 6.1 compatible with RedHat 5.5

Hi,
Sun Java web Server 6.1 installed on Red Hat 5.1 and Opertaing System is going to be upgraded to Red Hat 5.5. Can any one tell me whether Sun Java Web Server 6.1 is compatible with Red Hat Linux 5.5

If you want the internal server to service requests for /admin, you should teach the internal server to service requests for /admin.
It is possible -- but complicated -- to configure Web Server 6.1 to rewrite request URIs before proxying requests to the internal server. However, unless you rewrite all the HTML generated by the internal server, the results probably won't be what you want. Consider, for example, what happens if the internal server's HTML references /foo.gif. Does that mean the web browser should ask for /admin/foo.gif or /foo.gif?
Rewriting request URIs is much simpler in Web Server 7.0, but it's still probably not the right tool.

Looking for graphic cards compatible with the basic G5

Help!!
Went to the Apple Store to see if my G5 (M9020LL/A) which is the 1.6GHz PowerPC to see if it was compatible/could drive the 30" cinema display. They assured me my G5 could handle the large display. I have OS 10.5.8, iLife 09, 1 TB HD, 4GB RAM, NVIDIA GeForce FX 5200 Ultra with 64MB DDR SDRAM for the 8x AGP Pro slot.
The display arrived, I get picture but not resolution. Searched for a video/graphics card that was compatible. The ATI Radeon 9600 Pro PC/Mac with 256MB was recommended. I purchased one but can only get it to work with a safe boot. Get resolution but iPhoto cannot do the photos in full screen mode. But I can get full screen photos in screen saver mode?!
Apple support states they only recommend/support two cards for my model, the Radeon 9600 @ 64 MB, 2480X1326 res or the Radeon Pro, 128 MB, 2480X1326 res.
Has anyone had a similar problem with the Radeon card 9600 Pro PC/Mac with 256MB? Does anyone have a solution as to which card would be compatible with my G5 and get 2560X1600 res?
Any suggestions? Thanks you for your help!

Hi-
Welcome to Discussions!
Apple support states they only recommend/support two cards for my model,
Those were the only two cards offered at the time, so that is their "official position". You may safely ignore them..... even though they lied to you regarding the 30" ACD and your machine.
Has anyone had a similar problem with the Radeon card 9600 Pro PC/Mac with 256MB?
Often reported here on the forum.
Not a good card. If it works, fine, but many report as you do....Safe mode only.
The G5 can use any 8x AGP graphics card that was available in any AGP model G5.
OEM Mac cards with dual link DVI for the 30" ACD are:
Radeon 9650
Radeon X800XT
Geforce 6800 GT DDL
Geforce 6800 Ultra DDL
A flashed (converted WinPC card) Geforce 7800 GS may also be used.
Any of the above cards can be found on eBay/Apple Components.

Reader X compatible with Acrobat 9 shared review

I need to know if I can initiate a shared PDF review with Acrobat 9 and include reviewers running Reader X and Reader 9.
If anyone has info on this, it would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks

So presumably a Shared Review started with Acrobat 9 could also be responded to with Reader X? I have such a user that can't seem to connect to the review, though he can open the document.

JSP Server is not compatible with Win XP Service Pack 2

i've install java serve into my comp system with the following specification:
Operating System: Windows XP Service Pack 2
Processor: Pentium 4,1.60 Ghz
RAM:256
Database: Microsoft Access 2003
The PROBLEM are:
Page with .jsp extension cannot be diaplay, when it's come to .html/.htm there is no problems at all.
Why this kind of problems occur is it because of the my comp. spec or because of Jave server didn't suite with XP Service Pack II...
I TRIED SO MANY TIME BUT THE OUTPUT IS STILL THE SAME!!!

i've install java serve into my comp system with the
following specification:
Operating System: Windows XP Service Pack 2
Processor: Pentium 4,1.60 Ghz
RAM:256
Database: Microsoft Access 2003
The PROBLEM are:
Page with .jsp extension cannot be diaplay, when it's
come to .html/.htm there is no problems at all.Right, because the OS launches the browser and it renders the HTML.
Why this kind of problems occur is it because of the
my comp. spec or because of Jave server didn't suite
with XP Service Pack II...This makes no sense.
I TRIED SO MANY TIME BUT THE OUTPUT IS STILL THE SAME!!!You think you should be able to double click a .jsp file and display it?
Tell me, what should be launched when you do this?
This is not the way to run .jsp files. You need to deploy them in a web app on a servlet/JSP engine and submit HTTP requests to that app server from a browser. You cannot double click on a JSP and display it.
Repeat: It can't be done.
%

Looking for USB Hub compatible with Mac Pro 8 Core (early 2008)!

I need a good, reliable USB Hub. I was looking at a D-Link with 7 ports but I read a review on Amazon saying it didn't work well with 8 core Mac Pro. The reviewer said the Mac only recognized some of the time upon start up and he had to unplug and replug to get it going.
Not sure if this was user error or faulty product.
Anyone have any experience with a good reliable 7 port USB Hub? Perhaps even with this D-Link?
Thanks!
Zap

There are also reports (see http://www.hardmac.com today) of over loading USB ports on Mac Pro... even if you only use the available ports and hubs (like Cinema Display which should be getting its own power, but does not).
I would strongly recommend a PCIe controller first.
http://eshop.macsales.com/search/Aaxeon

HT4814 Server App not compatible with Mountain Lion

I have just upgraded my station to Mountain Lion and previously copied SERVER App is not compatible. I am not going to upgrade my server to Mountain Lion as yet, therefore I cannot administer my server through 2. from above. Sollutions?
Station: ML on MacMini. Server MacMiniServer Lion Server

Right, yes I understood your plan. The worry I have is that even once you copy Server v2 to your workstation, on first launch it will try to install the ML Server components. So....I fired up my virtual machine of ML client to see once again what's that like again. One first launch Server prompts to configure/install the server software. However the menu and menu items are live, e.g. the "Manage" entry is live. So I suspect you could connect from the workstation to the server and manage it. I just don't know if that "setup" screen will thereby go away, if I'm only using it to manage the server from the workstation. I'm away from my Server, so I cannot at the moment verify what happens.
I went ahead and bought ML + Server v2. I installed it in a VM to take a look at the changes and to see if services I use functioned o.k. in testing. I took forever to setup my MacMini with Lion Server because I was new to OS X Server, but I've been using Macs for ages and OS X from the very start. So I installed, messed up, reinstalled Lion Server many times before I figured it out. Right when it was pretty much good to go, ML came out. Since my MacMini with Lion Server never got used for anything more than testing, it was a big deal for me to go ahead with ML + Server v2. I'm just using it as a home server, and pretty limited at that: OD, File Sharing, Network Homes, and Profile Manager. ML gives me one share and an easy way to turn on FTP (compared to Lion), so I'm going to use that service too; I have a scanner than doesn't work with Lion and ML's SMB but functions with FTP.
Some things are missing in ML, DCHP for instance is but isn't there. You might take a look at to get an idea:
http://arstechnica.com/apple/2012/07/the-server-simplified-a-power-users-guide-t o-os-x-server/
I always take caution with early releases, I usually test clones made with SuperDuper! or Carbon Copy Cloner. With Mt Lion Server, it was easier, again since I didn't have a "live" Lion server, to make a virtual machines.

Help! looking for internet camera compatible with Mac

I need help! I purchased a Mac recently and so far I am very happy with it. However, we just had a baby and I'd like to see and hear my baby from my computer at work. At work we use PCs and at home we havea iBook G4. I bought a D-link wireless G internet camera, the DCS-950G, but I could not install it because it requires you to have a PC for initial installation. I've looked around the web but I've been unable to find an internet camera that works with the Mac. I am desperate and frustrated! Does aynone know of an wireless internet camera that works with the Mac? I'd greatly appreciate any help you can provide. Thanks.

Hello B Real Brad
You do not say which DV camcorder you have. The exact answers to your questions depend upon your camcorder's features and user guide instructions. If you experience problems when you try your camcorder, check your camcorder's users guide instructions. That having been said, here are the answers to your posted questions:> Do I need to have a firewire cable to successfully use it through iChat ...
Firewire will be easiest. If you have a Firewire cable to download your DV Video to iMovie, that one will work fine.
... or can I use the normal usb cable?
Depending upon your camcorder, that may work with additional software and or hardware, but, if your camcorder offers it, Firewire will me much easier.
.. is the quality ... better using a DV camcorder ... ?
Usually. This depends on which camcorder you compare with which webcam.
Some people like the image quality of their camcorders better. See John Kennedy's "Cameras and Image Quality", the Sat - October 30, 2004, blog for a comparison. (John's is a very high quality camcorder.)
See this link for my reasons for using a webcam when I do not need portability or highest possible quality. Some of the reasons may be of interest to you.For specifics on how to get going, see my recent response to Tony Keogh. Although Tony asks specifically about a particular Sony model, the specific suggestions I made there should apply to your camcorder, too.
If the above do not get you going, I suggest that you start your own topic and give as many specifics as possible about your system, your problem, and what you have already tried. Your questions deserve the individual attention they will get in a separate topic.
Here are a couple of other suggestions for your consideration:
(1) I see from your other posts that you use Miglia TVMini. Be aware that some AV devices and third-party items can cause possible hardware or software conflicts with iChat.
(2) Also, your system info shows that you are using 10.4.4. I suggest that you update to the latest available version of Tiger using the following method:- Repair permissions.
- Then download and apply the Mac OS X 10.4.9 Combo Update (PPC).
- Finish with another Permissions Repair.The latest Combo Update offers several additions and improvements over the older versions.
Cheers,
Jim
Mac OS X (10.4.9) G5 DP 1.8 External iSight

Is Oracle Weblogic server 10.3 compatible with jdk 1.5.0?

When i point 1.5.0 JDK version to Oracle Weblogic server 10.3 "Bad version number in .class file" error is thrown while starting the server.
can any one help me to resolve this issue?
Edited by: user10643892 on Nov 23, 2008 10:40 PM

Hi, there.
You are right. The overview page has no clear statement on JDK. However, if you look into the supported operating system links, you'll find only JDK 6 is supported. Example for Solaris:
http://edocs.bea.com/platform/suppconfigs/configs/solaris/solaris10_103.html
Note that there is support for JDK 5 clients, which may be useful to you:
http://e-docs.bea.com/wls/docs103/notes/new.html#wp1090981
I hope this answers your question.
Cheers,
-Adrian

Adobe Reader 8 compatible with Acrobat Standard and Pro 7?

Our organization has Adobe Reader 7 deployed to all users. Some users also have Acrobat Standard 7 or Acrobat Pro 7. We want to upgrade all users to Adobe Reader 8 (or maybe 9) but do not want to upgrade Standard and Pro users yet.
I have not been able to find any information about compatibility issues with Reader 8 and older versions of Acrobat, but last time we did an upgrade in similar fashion we experienced issues. Any insight?

Thanks for the reply. I stumbled across something today after posting. I had already known that If the ARX user also had one of the other products (AAXS or AAXP), then they would get the dialog box. Here is what I just figured out: if the user uninstalled ARX and re-installed (still having both ARX and AAXS or AAXP in the end) then they no longer get the dialog box. It seems like perhaps its an issue the AAXP and AAXS are overwriting something in the registry.

Can anyone recommend and NAS type server that is compatible with my apple products?

I am looking for a product that will allow me to store all of my music / videos / images and allow me to access them via my iphone and ipad (and AirPlay) and also allow access to my other half on her devices.
A NAS type server has been mentioned to me but it's not clear how the access from the mobile devices will work. (is it via an app??)
I would like it to act as a home server.
I'm not sure if it makes any difference but I don't currently own a MAC.
Thanks in advance

non out of the box
the apple programs support accessing from shared itunes lib but only true ones even nas's which say they work like shared libs don't work
some nas like my sonology have apps for ios which allow me to play the media from them
and general upnp apps are also supported but you need to use 3th party apps

Looking Server-based Solution Compatible with Acrobat 7.0

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for