Loop over part of caracteristics value

Hello,
I have about 250 customers in my level\package.
For a specific calculation I need to run only on part of them.
It is one step in a sequence so I can't define a different package for it.
The loop should include other characteristics, such as customer group, Material level 1 and 2.
Is there a way to loop over only the records of these special customers?
Thanks,
Daphna

I used the following coding for calculating something only for a group of customers held in variable 'GCST' and with different calculation depending on the customer group:
DATA INDX TYPE I.
DATA CST TYPE 0CUSTOMER.
DATA CSTGR TYPE 0CUST_GROUP.
*get the number of customers in the variable
INDX = VARC('GCST').
DO.
IF INDX = 0.
EXIT.
ENDIF.
get one customer from the variable
CST = VARI('GCST',INDX).
get it's customer group
CSTGR = ATRV(0CUST_GROUP,CST).
decrement the index for next loop
INDX = INDX - 1.
IF CUSTGR = A1.
my calc for customer group a1
ELSEIF CUSTGR = A2.
my calc for customer group a1
ENDIF.
ENDDO.

Similar Messages

Loop over form values & insert into db

Form
prod_id     prod_name       prod_price    prod_status
001         product 001     1.00          1
002         product 002     2.00          1
003         product 003     3.00          0
004         product 004     4.00          0
Form Dump
prod_name      product 001,product 002,product 003,product 004
FIELDNAMES     prod_id, prod_name, prod_price, prod_status
prod_price     1.00,2.00,3.00,4.00
prod_status    1,1,0,0
prod_id        001,002,003
I want to update a few fields, prod_price and prod_status. I submit these values to my update page but I'm not sure how to loop over these values and update by the prod_id. In my update page I'm using cfdump and I see the structure of the form, the fieldnames as well as the prod_id, prod_name, etc and their values.
My question is how do I loop over these form values so I'll be able to update by each prod_id? I've played around with looping over the form collection values but no luck.

When I do stuff like this, I append the "id" value to the end of each form field. That enables me to ensure the other fields match up.
When processing the form, I generally do something like this:
<cfloop list="#form.fieldnames# index="ThisField">
<cfif left(ThisField, 9) is "prod_name">
<cfscript>
ThisID = removechars(thisfield, 9);
ThisName = form["prod_name" & ThisID];
same for other fields
Then do something with those variables.

How can I use an iteration value from a "while" (or "for") loop as part of a filename?

I am using the "Write To Measurement File" function inside a while structure and would like to incorporate the iterative value from the while-loop as part of the file name. I'm not sure how to do it. Any suggestions?

Like this:
Edit: Oops. Sorry for the double answer.
Message Edited by smercurio_fc on 05-22-2007 04:25 PM
Attachments:
Example_BD.png ‏3 KB

Value Mapping: how to loop over a nested context in a adv. user function

Hello,
i have the following source structure:
<rec> (1:1)
<field1>aaa</field1> (1:1)
<field2>bbb</field2> (1:1)
<b><struc> <u>(1:unbounded)</u>
<name>myName</name>
<value>myValue</value>
</struc></b>
</rec>
Destination structure:
<rec> (1:1)
<field1>aaa</field1> (1:1)
<field2>bbb</field2> (1:1)
<b><field3>bbb</field2> (1:1)</b>
</rec>
In order to fill the destination field3 i have to loop over the input-structure struc.
My problem is, that i don't know how to get access to the name/value pair with a
extended user-defined function. Since each occurrence in struc i not a simple string but consists of 2 fields, i guess it is not enough simply to loop over input String Array.
Please help.

just like u have a loop stmt in java prgm. a simple code:
Here a and b are the strings that comes to the udf
for(int i=0;i<a.length;i++)
     boolean found = false;
     int j = 0;
     for(j=0;j<b.length;j++)
          if (a<i>.equals(b[j]))
               found = true;
               break;
     if (found == true)
          result.addValue(c[j]);
     else
          result.addValue("");
Message was edited by:
        Prabhu S

[Solved] Foreach loop that loops over all files in a folder does not consider first file found

Hello,
I have a foreach loop in SSIS (as part of Visual Studio 10 and with SQL Server 2012).
It loops over all files in a folder (ForEach File Enumerator).
I set the folder: OK
Traverse Sub folders: OK
I have set up a Variable in Variable Mappings called FileName so it shows User::FileName: OK
Index of variable is 0: OK
It almost works ok. Except that the first file it finds is never considered.
I set a breakpoint then and the first file it finds, is shown in black in the watch variable window. All subsequent files found are shown in red font. When I change the names of the files so another file is the first file found then it skips the other one
which now is the first file.
What is going on here? Why does SSIS skip the first file it finds in a foreach file loop?
Any suggestions highly appreciated.
Thank you
Andi
Andreas

"red font - interesting, any example to show us (image)
It would be interesting to share with us whether you use any file masks or expressions.
Arthur
MyBlog
Twitter
It appears a variable value turns red when it changes between breakpoints. It started black for the first value (the first file, obtained BEFORE the execution reached the breakpoint), and then turned red. I was able to reproduce this behavior on a test environment.
However, it did not skip any files.
OP, please set up the test shown in the image below. Create a breakpoint in the sequence container for the "OnPreExecute" event.

Problem with Message-Mapping: Loop over Elements possible?

Hi all,
I want do create a Message-Mapping for an IDoc-to-File Scenario. In the Source Structure there are some Elements which can appear more than once (1..unbounded). I need a mechanism which loops over these elements and search for specified values. From the Element which contains an element with this specified value the mapping should write a value in the target structure.
Here a simple example (source structure) for better understanding:
<root>
   <invoice>
      <number> 10 </number>
      <sum> 200.00 </sum>
   </invoice>
   <invoice>
      <number> 20 </number>
      <sum> 150.00 </sum>
   </invoice>
   <invoice>
      <number> 30 </number>
      <sum> 120.00 </sum>
   </invoice>
</root>
Now the duty of the Mapping should be to search in the elements <invoice> for the number 30. And then the sum of the invoice with the number 30 should be written in a field of the target structure.
I tried it out with a constant togehter with an equalsS-function and an ifWithoutElse-function, but it is working only then, if the invoice with the number 30 has the first position in the root context.
Can anybody help me? Thanks
With kind regards
Christopher

Hi,
Write a UDF to sum the required values and map to target node.
See while writing the UDF select the type as queue.
number -- removecontext-UDF targetnode
sum----removecontext--/
number abd sum or the two inputs
in UDF
int nsum = 0;
for(int i;i < number.length;i++){
if number(i).equals("30") then
     nsum = nsum + valueOf(sum(i));
result.addValue(nsum); // convert the nsum into string
Regsrds
Chilla

Message-Mapping: nested Loops over Elements

Hi Experts,
I have problems with my Message-Mapping in the IR. I have a source and a target structure. In the following I will give you easy examples of these structures:
<u>source structure:</u>
   <E1EDP01>
      <E1EDP19>
         <QUALF> ... </QUALF>
         <IDTNR> ... </IDTNR>
      </E1EDP19>
      <E1EDP19>
         <QUALF> ... </QUALF>
         <IDTNR> ... </IDTNR>
      </E1EDP19>
   </E1EDP01>
   <E1EDP01>
      <E1EDP19>
         <QUALF> ... </QUALF>
         <IDTNR> ... </IDTNR>
      </E1EDP19>
      <E1EDP19>
         <QUALF> ... </QUALF>
         <IDTNR> ... </IDTNR>
      </E1EDP19>
   </E1EDP01>
<u>target structure:</u>
<LineItem>
   <IDTNR></IDTNR>
</LineItem>
<LineItem>
   <IDTNR></IDTNR>
</LineItem>
That means:
For every <E1EDP01> in the source structure I create one <LineItem> in the target structure. One E1EDP01-Element can contain more than one E1EDP19-Elements. I have to loop over these E1EDP19-Elements, because I have to locate the Element <QUALF> with a given (fixed) value. The Mapping should put the value from the Element <IDTNR> from the source structure - where the QUALF-Element has this given value - in the IDTNR-Element of the target structure.
I tried it with a UDF, but only the first <IDTNR> in the target structure got filled.
Thanks for your help
Christopher

Thank you,
but how I can set the Elements IDTNR and QUALF to the context E1EDP01?
In the splitByValue-Function do I need "each value"?
best regards
Christopher

Looping over fields from internal table

In a FM I have to check records of two ITABs against each other. Most fields can be checked 1:1 but some must be checked according to some business logic.
I first want to check field-by-field and then I want to deal with exceptions.
Question: How can I loop over fields in an ITAB in such a manner that I can compare fields?

Hi, you can loop thru the columns(fields) of an internal table like so.
field-symbols: <fs>.
loop at itab.
do.
* Here you can use the field name instead of SY-INDEX
   assign component sy-index of structure itab to <fs>.
   if sy-subrc <>.
   exit.
   endif.
* Now that you have access to the field via field symbol, you can compare
* this value.
Write:/ <fs>.
enddo.
endloop.
Regards,
Rich Heilman

Why optimizer prefers nested loop over hash join?

What do I look for if I want to find out why the server prefers a nested loop over hash join?
The server is 10.2.0.4.0.
The query is:
SELECT p.*
    FROM t1 p, t2 d
    WHERE d.emplid = p.id_psoft
      AND p.flag_processed = 'N'
      AND p.desc_pool = :b1
      AND NOT d.name LIKE '%DUPLICATE%'
      AND ROWNUM < 2tkprof output is:
Production
call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
Parse        1      0.01       0.00          0          0          4           0
Execute      1      0.00       0.01          0          4          0           0
Fetch        1    228.83     223.48          0    4264533          0           1
total        3    228.84     223.50          0    4264537          4           1
Misses in library cache during parse: 1
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 108 (SANJEEV)
Rows     Row Source Operation
      1 COUNT STOPKEY (cr=4264533 pr=0 pw=0 time=223484076 us)
      1   NESTED LOOPS (cr=4264533 pr=0 pw=0 time=223484031 us)
10401    TABLE ACCESS FULL T1 (cr=192 pr=0 pw=0 time=228969 us)
      1    TABLE ACCESS FULL T2 (cr=4264341 pr=0 pw=0 time=223182508 us)Development
call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
Parse        1      0.01       0.00          0          0          0           0
Execute      1      0.00       0.01          0          4          0           0
Fetch        1      0.05       0.03          0        512          0           1
total        3      0.06       0.06          0        516          0           1
Misses in library cache during parse: 1
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 113 (SANJEEV)
Rows     Row Source Operation
      1 COUNT STOPKEY (cr=512 pr=0 pw=0 time=38876 us)
      1   HASH JOIN (cr=512 pr=0 pw=0 time=38846 us)
     51    TABLE ACCESS FULL T2 (cr=492 pr=0 pw=0 time=30230 us)
    861    TABLE ACCESS FULL T1 (cr=20 pr=0 pw=0 time=2746 us)

sanjeevchauhan wrote:
What do I look for if I want to find out why the server prefers a nested loop over hash join?
The server is 10.2.0.4.0.
The query is:
SELECT p.*
FROM t1 p, t2 d
WHERE d.emplid = p.id_psoft
AND p.flag_processed = 'N'
AND p.desc_pool = :b1
AND NOT d.name LIKE '%DUPLICATE%'
AND ROWNUM < 2
You've got already some suggestions, but the most straightforward way is to run the unhinted statement in both environments and then force the join and access methods you would like to see using hints, in your case probably "USE_HASH(P D)" in your production environment and "FULL(P) FULL(D) USE_NL(P D)" in your development environment should be sufficient to see the costs and estimates returned by the optimizer when using the alternate access and join patterns.
This give you a first indication why the optimizer thinks that the chosen access path seems to be cheaper than the obviously less efficient plan selected in production.
As already mentioned by Hemant using bind variables complicates things a bit since EXPLAIN PLAN is not reliable due to bind variable peeking performed when executing the statement, but not when explaining.
Since you're already on 10g you can get the actual execution plan used for all four variants using DBMS_XPLAN.DISPLAY_CURSOR which tells you more than the TKPROF output in the "Row Source Operation" section regarding the estimates and costs assigned.
Of course the result of your whole exercise might be highly dependent on the actual bind variable value used.
By the way, your statement is questionable in principle since you're querying for the first row of an indeterministic result set. It's not deterministic since you've defined no particular order so depending on the way Oracle executes the statement and the physical storage of your data this query might return different results on different runs.
This is either an indication of a bad design (If the query is supposed to return exactly one row then you don't need the ROWNUM restriction) or an incorrect attempt of a Top 1 query which requires you to specify somehow an order, either by adding a ORDER BY to the statement and wrapping it into an inline view, or e.g. using some analytic functions that allow you specify a RANK by a defined ORDER.
This is an example of how a deterministic Top N query could look like:
SELECT
FROM
SELECT p.*
    FROM t1 p, t2 d
    WHERE d.emplid = p.id_psoft
      AND p.flag_processed = 'N'
      AND p.desc_pool = :b1
      AND NOT d.name LIKE '%DUPLICATE%'
ORDER BY <order_criteria>
WHERE ROWNUM <= 1;Regards,
Randolf
Oracle related stuff blog:
http://oracle-randolf.blogspot.com/
SQLTools++ for Oracle (Open source Oracle GUI for Windows):
http://www.sqltools-plusplus.org:7676/
http://sourceforge.net/projects/sqlt-pp/

Looping over QoQ Where Clause

I have two queries. One is a main query that we pull from a form submission. The second is a small query resultset that lists different subgroups in my company and what main group they belong to. I pull several QoQ from the main query. In the main query results, there is a column that holds the subgroup information. I am trying to do a Q0Q where I group the data from the main query into the main groups for analysis. Here is an example...
Main Query
record 1 - subgroup 1
record 2 - subgroup 2
record 3 - subgroup 3
Second Query
Subgroup 1 - Main Group 1
Subgroup 2 - Main Group 2
Subgroup 3 - Main Group 1
So I am trying to loop over a QoQ on the main query where the result set would contain the information only from Main Group 1. So record 2 would be eliminated. I have tried using an IN clause with a cfloop, but I run into syntax trouble with the comma. I also tried looping over the QoQ as a whole and the resulting dump is only the last record.
If there is anything else you need, let me know.
Any thoughts?
Clay
P.S. Here is a code sampling...
    <cfquery name="rsGroup" datasource="nps">
    SELECT *
    FROM "GROUP"
    WHERE GROUP.PrimaryGroup = '#form.primarygroup#'
    </cfquery>
    rsGroup - <cfdump var="#rsGroup#">
    <cfloop query="rsGroup" startrow="1" endrow="#rsGroup.RecordCount#">
        <cfquery name="rsGroupQoQ" dbtype="query">
        SELECT *
        FROM rsNPS
        WHERE rsNPS.grp = '#rsGroup.group#'
        </cfquery>
    </cfloop>
    rsGroupQoQ - <cfdump var="#rsGroupQoQ#"><cfabort>

ok...I figured it out. I thought I would post my solution in case anyone else runs into this. Also, if anyone out there has a better way, let me know.

<cfset GroupArray = ArrayNew(1)>

<cfset addMainGroup = QueryAddColumn(rsNPS,'mainGroup',GroupArray)>

<cfloop query="rsNPS" startrow="1" endrow="#rsNPS.RecordCount#">
    <cfif rsNPS.GRP EQ "xxxxx"><cfset rsNPS.mainGroup = "yyyyy"></cfif>
    <cfif rsNPS.GRP EQ "xxxxxxxxxx"><cfset rsNPS.mainGroup = "yyyyyyyyyy"></cfif>
    <cfif ...etc. ...
</cfloop>

CFScript Math expression - Summing up looped over data

If I loop over numeric data and I want to sum that data I am looking for the correct manner to do so. Of course I want to do this in cfscript.
I know that I could go the route of doing a one demensional array and using the array sum function and I could also use stauctures.
I am interested in different solutions to this problem.
My end state is that I need to sum and average looped dynamic data for reporting purposes.
For purposes of example static values will be helpful for better understanding.
Thanks in advance.

Owain,
This is what I came up with and it outputs the looped data. Now I am trying to add it up and average the results.
BTW Adam,
Be delusional on a Microsoft or Oracle forum board.
Now that would be some fun reading cutting through those flames! (In a patronising Kinda Way!).

Looping Over INSERT

I've got a form. The form asks the visitor their address
(first name, last name, street address, apartment number, city,
state, and zip code... each a separate text field). This form is
repeated 10 times on the page, allowing the visitor to enter
multiple addresses. I've given each form field a unique name by
just appending "_1" or "_2" after it. For example, my fields are
named...
FIRST FORM BLOCK
first_name_1
last_name_1
SECOND FORM BLOCK
first_name_2
last_name_2
Each form block (address) will be inserted into a table in my
database as a new row. Is there a quick and easy way to loop over
the insert 10 times, rather than have 10 separate INSERT statements
in my code? A CFLOOP would work just fine if not for dynamic form
field names, but I would have to take into account the "_X". I want
to say I've done this before; I'm just overthinking.

<cfloop from="1" to="10" index="i">
<cfquery ...>
INSERT INTO ...
(aCol,bCol,cCol...)

#form['first_Name_' & i]#,
#form['last_Name_' & i]#
</cfquery>
</cfloop>
The array notation for a complex variables is a very powerful
concept.
Many advance techniques can be used with it.

Looping over cfdirectory

Hello. I am having an issue with looping over cfdirectory.
What I am trying to do here is grab the size of the files
associated with the db. So where #current.Dir.Name# = #DB Column#
update size etc.... What's happening is it is displaying the same
id about 90 something times...Nice I know. Can anyone help?
<cfloop query="qLoadFile">
<cfoutput>
<cfdirectory
directory="/test1/test2/test3/0/#qLoadFile.owner_id#" action="list"
name="currentDir">
#qLoadFile.owner_id# 
</cfoutput>
<table border="1" bordercolor="#000000" >
<tr>
<td>File Name</td>
<td>File Size</td>
<td>Directory Location</td>
<td>File Type</td>
</tr>
<cfloop query="currentDir">
<tr>
<cfoutput>
<form name="updateSize" action="
http://myURL.com/test2.cfm"
method="post">
<td><input type="text" name="name"
value="#currentDir.Name#" /></td>
<td><input type="text" name="size"
value="#currentDir.Size#" /></td>
<td>#right(currentDir.DIRECTORY, 2)#</td>
<td>#currentDir.Type#</td>
</cfoutput>
</tr>
</cfloop>
</cfloop>
</table> <br />
<input type="text" name="number_of_directories"
value="<cfoutput>#valuelist(qLoadFile.owner_id)#</cfoutput>">
<input type="submit" name="submit" value="submit"/>
</form>

I just put your query into a random page of mine, changed the
query to reflect a local database and got this output (all
formatted correctly though!)
Since I dont have the directory setup that you have the
directory structures are empty, however it seems to be looping
through fine
59 File Name File Size Directory Location File Type
60 File Name File Size Directory Location File Type
61 File Name File Size Directory Location File Type
62 File Name File Size Directory Location File Type
63 File Name File Size Directory Location File Type
64 File Name File Size Directory Location File Type
65 File Name File Size Directory Location File Type
Is this what you are looking for?

How use c:forEach to loop over a String[][]

Hello,
Is there anyone that can tell me how to use the c:forEach tag to loop over a double String[][]? I can find examples for resultsets etc....but whatever I try with my String[][], I never can get the results on the screen.
Thanx,
debeumers

You need to set up a double c:forEach loop.
ie
<%
// initialisation of string[][]
String[][] sValues = new String[5][5];
for (int i=0; i<sValues.length; i++){
for (int j=0; j<sValues.length; j++){
sValues[i][j] = "" + (i + j);
pageContext.setAttribute("arrayValues", sValues);
%>
// And now to test print out the values
<c:forEach var="row" items="${arrayValues}">
<c:forEach var="col" items="${row}">
<c:out value="${col}"/>
</c:forEach>
<br>
</c:forEach>
Hope this helps
Cheers, evnafets

Error when looping over list

Looping over a series of lists created from form fields
generates an error when one of the fields on the form has been left
blank. The form is a list of event dates, start times and end
times. One event can have a number of times.
When the end time is uncertain, we want to leave it blank.
However, doing so shortens the list created from #form.endtime# so
that the lists don't match and there's an error message:
"Invalid list index 2.
In function ListGetAt(list, index [, delimiters]), the value
of index, 2, is not a valid as the first argument (this list has 1
elements). Valid indexes are in the range 1 through the number of
elements in the list."
How do you get around this problem? Tx.

yoman,
No need for separate forms. Use a counter to number each
group of field names
<input name="EventDateID1" ...>
<input name="EventDate1" ...>
<input name="EventDateID2" ...>
<input name="EventDate2" ...>
Then loop through the form fields on your action page
<cfloop from="1" to="#form.maxCounter#"
index="counter">
<cfset EventDateID = form["EventDateID#counter#">
<cfset EventDate = form["EventDate#counter#">
... rest of fields
<cfquery name="UpdateFeatures" datasource="#dsn#">
UPDATE EventDates
SET EventDate = '#EventDate#', ....
WHERE EventDateID = #EventDateID#
</cfquery>
</cfloop>
You should validate the values and/or use cfqueryparam

Loop over part of caracteristics value

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for