Lots of SSOExceptions: Invalid session state

Hi forum,
I've lots of following messages in the gateway (version 6.2) logging. Can someone explain what these mean and what a possible cause is?
4/12/05 3:47:26 PM CEST: Thread[Thread-531,5,main]
ERROR: SSOUtil: Unable to create SSOToken ->
com.iplanet.sso.SSOException: AQIC5wM2LY4Sfcxug2GQWBYUCzW8CSeJoREmW776p/YjJXw= Invalid session state
AQIC5wM2LY4Sfcxug2GQWBYUCzW8CSeJoREmW776p/YjJXw=
at com.iplanet.sso.providers.dpro.SSOProviderImpl.createSSOToken(SSOProviderImpl.java:155)
at com.iplanet.sso.SSOTokenManager.createSSOToken(SSOTokenManager.java:296)
at com.sun.portal.util.SSOUtil.getSSOTokenNoDecode(Unknown Source)
at com.sun.portal.util.SSOUtil.getSSOToken(Unknown Source)
at com.sun.portal.rproxy.configservlet.client.UserProfile.<init>(Unknown Source)
at com.sun.portal.rproxy.connectionhandler.BasicAuthentication.getPassword(Unknown Source)
at com.sun.portal.rproxy.connectionhandler.HTTPRetriever.getResponse(Unknown Source)
at com.sun.portal.rproxy.connectionhandler.Session.retrieveResponse(Unknown Source)
at com.sun.portal.rproxy.connectionhandler.Session.processProtocolRequest(Unknown Source)
at com.sun.portal.rproxy.connectionhandler.Session.processNextRequest(Unknown Source)
at com.sun.portal.rproxy.server.RequestProcessor$1.run(Unknown Source)
at com.sun.portal.util.ThreadPoolThread.run(Unknown Source)
Regards,
Bram Abbekerk

We also have this message in the logs.
We asked the sun support and it's not an error.
Take a look at bug-id 5069425 for more information: http://sunsolve.sun.com/search/document.do?assetkey=urn:cds:docid:1-1-5069425-1

Similar Messages

Session state always invalid after login

Hello community,
i have a functional login process which uses my own login with username and password. After login i branch to application start page, but this session now is different from the start login session, so every login is invalid and will branch to authentication scheme invalid page.
My login url is: f?p=100:100:123456
After correct login (i have tested in the database with a lot of inserts into tmp_table)
i want to branch with the standard login procedure wwv_flow_custom_auth_std.login() to page 1000.
The correct url is shown in the browser, but the current page is the login page 100, because (i think) the session is invalid. In the authentication theme the invalid session page is set to page 100.
I have tested several pages and always this page is branched.
So im shure, that the session state is always invalid after login.
But why ????
Has anyone an idea ?
Thank you for responding.
Frank

Hi Jari,
problem was solved.
The IE8 has cached an invalid site.
I know now were it is come from.
I have an after submit process which sets the cookie with following code:
owa_util.mime_header('text/html; charset=UTF-8;', FALSE);
owa_cookie.send(
name=>'DHW_COOKIE',
value=>utl_raw.cast_to_raw(dbms_obfuscation_toolkit.md5(input_string => ':P100_REGCODE' || :P100_USERNAME ))
owa_util.http_header_close;
But this results in display on the screen like html text without tags, so it looks like text on the screen header.
It shows "content-type=text/html charset=WINDOWS 1252 .......
The cookie is not set to the disk and now the IE8 explorer is dead.
The described problem of this thread is shown.
If you close all sessions and restart IE8 then the error is fixed.
Also i have disabled the after submit process with setting the cookie.
So i live now without having a cookie set.
Do you have any idea for this behaviour ?
Frank

Session State Protection invalid Checksum errors show valid checksum

Hi,
I am investigating Session Sate Prtection to let me make my appications more secure.
I have created a simple Report / Form pair that allows me to open an item for edditing.
I have set the Application to Session State Protection 'Enabled' and and my form page to Page Access Prtection 'Arguments Must Have Checksum'.
From my report page I click on the edit icon for a row and I get the edit page with the url:
f?p=126:3:7115846938209895::::P3_WORK_PACKAGE_ID:1179&cs=3CC0C97D3A8B114D2E40EDF158C0AECFB
If I then manually manipulate this url, to change my P3_WORK_PACKAGE_ID from 1179 to 1180, to:
f?p=126:3:7115846938209895::::P3_WORK_PACKAGE_ID:1180&cs=3CC0C97D3A8B114D2E40EDF158C0AECFB
I get an error of:
Error The checksum computed on the request, clear cache, argument names, and argument values (P3_WORK_PACKAGE_ID1180 [01BE394775DB7B5A861BEA77B6637A46] ) did not match the checksum passed into the show procedure (CC0C97D3A8B114D2E40EDF158C0AECFB).
All well and good, but it tells me what the checksum should be. I can now update the url to use the displayed checksum to make the url:
f?p=126:3:7115846938209895::::P3_WORK_PACKAGE_ID:1180&cs=301BE394775DB7B5A861BEA77B6637A46
the form opens for P3_WORK_PACKAGE_ID 1180.
How do I stop the error message telling my how to bypass the checksum security?
Thanks,
Martin

I am not sure but maybe this detailed message is coming if you are logged in to Apex and otherwise it is showing more general error message with no checksum?

Stockbroker states that "invalid session" message is due to brownser how can I avoid this?

I tried to cover a short sale while trading online. Could not execute the trade. Got a message in red "invalid session". Broker tech support stated that it was not their software, it was cause by the browser, Firefoz 5.0 running on Windows XP. How can I avoid this?

That is not very easy to answer, because the cause of the corruption is unknown.<br />
In severe cases you may even need to delete the file cookies.sqlite that stores the cookies.<br />
There is also a possibility that security software or cleanup software is causing such problems.
If you've never seen it before then it may not happen again, but it is not that difficult to remove the cookies in such a case.
See also:
*https://support.mozilla.com/kb/Clear+Recent+History

Saving session state in database table rather in websever for Ordering App

Hi all,
Ours is a ordering application (telecomm) domain.
Currently, we are storing user sessions data (Order shopping cart session data) in middle tier (iPlanet web server) which inturn consumes lot of memory resources.
Shopping cart could be in MBs if order is a huge business order.
So in order to not to overtax web server (middle tier), we are thinking of storing session data directly in a database table to relieve the overhead on web server and make use of database for storage.
I read that APEX (html db) is already using this "single metadata table" approach for session data management. But we are not using HTML DB to really look into.
Can some one advise how to go about storing "user session data" directly in a "database table" for both storage and retrieval purposes instead of storing it in "webserver".
How does this "metadata table" structure looks like. Is it more generic ?
Really appreciate your time and help/suggestions.

Joel,
Thanks for your response. sorry, i meant to say that "the current application does not use APEX but will look into it".
To build this is an utterly non-trivial exercise. Oh - it may not be so hard to save session state to a table when you POST a page. But you may want to reference this in many places, and it's a question of can you change all of these references to indirect references from session state in your application.In order to free up the load on webserver, we want to maintain session management in database. Could you please explain the above little more :
How do we maintain the "user session" with "database table" ?
Do we need to store "session data" at java object level or by page in database table ? How does the structure of this "metadata table" looks like.
Thanks for your time.

Session state value translation issue

Hello.
New to APEX and not all that web-savvy. Using version 3.1.2.00.02.
Little background:
I have a Select List item, "P1_OPERATOR", working from an LOV of relational operators (=, >, >=, <, <=). I use this item as a string substitute in report queries. This works fine for any reports on the page containing the "P1_OPERATOR" definition itself, "PAGE_1".
Problem:
However, when I attempt to set a session state value for a similar item ("P2_OPERATOR") on "PAGE_2" to the value of P1_OPERATOR using the column link of a report on PAGE_1, the value of P1_OPERATOR does not translate correctly for any values involving a right or left angle bracket (it works only for '=').
Scenario:
Let's say I'm on PAGE_1 and I select >=. The reports on that page display as expected. When I click on the link to PAGE 2, the reports there display "invalid relational operator". When I view session state from PAGE_2, I can see that...
P1_OPERATOR is '>='
P2_OPERATOR is '& gt;=' (space added to get it to display on this post).
So it's trying to use the html value for >= as a literal value.
I can also see that APEX has built the URL for the link page as follows...
(abbreviated) http://...:P2_OPERATOR,P2_DATE:%26gt%3B%3D%2C2009-06-27
If I type in the expected literal URL myself (outside of APEX) as...
(abbreviated) http://...:P2_OPERATOR,P2_DATE:>=,2009-06-27
...or even the expected hex URL (outside of APEX) as...
(abbreviated) http://...:P2_OPERATOR,P2_DATE:%5C%3E%3D%5C%2C2009-06-27
...PAGE_2 shows the expected results.
Is there a way to solve this translation problem? Some workaround I haven't thought of?
Thanks for your help.
Edited by: user11313762 on Jun 29, 2009 2:30 PM

Use an PL/SQL process On Load - Before Header with the following:-
*:P2_OPERATOR := :P1_OPERATOR;*
You'll have to use a hidden item as your condition (having looked at a page debug, any request value will have expired by the time the process will fire).
create a hidden item on page 2 called P2_SET_OP
use Item = value type of condition in your process where exp1 = P2_SET_OP (don't use colon notation here as ITEM has been specified) and exp 2 = Y
You can even reset P2_SET_OP back to null in the same process as you assighn the operator.
*:P2_OPERATOR := :P1_OPERATOR;*
*:P2_SET_OP := NULL;*
set the value of P2_SET_OP in your link as P2_SET_OP:Y
Gus..

Items not in session state when column link used and prevpage not submitted

I have a report on page 2 (cemetery lot info) with a column link to page 3 (burial info).
There is a process on page 3 that updates billing information using items from page 2, and billing code selected on page 3. The problem is, if the user does not submit page 2, session state is null, or has values from previously submitted page 2. How do I make sure the billing info is correctly updated from items displayed on page 2, if they are not in session state?
begin
if :P3_BILLING_CODE = 'OWN' then
:P3_BILLING_NAME := :P2_OWNER1_FIRSTNAME||' '||:P2_OWNER1_LASTNAME;
:P3_BILLING_ADDRESS1 := :P2_OWNER_ADDRESS1;
:P3_BILLING_ADDRESS2 := :P2_OWNER_ADDRESS2;
:P3_BILLING_CITY := :P2_OWNER_CITY;
:P3_BILLING_STATE := :P2_OWNER_STATE;
:P3_BILLING_ZIP := :P2_OWNER_ZIP;
:P3_BILLING_PHONE := :P2_OWNER_PHONE_AC||'-'||:P2_OWNER_PHONE_EX||'-'||:P2_OWNER_PHONE_SC;
elsif :P3_BILLING_CODE = 'MGR' then
:P3_BILLING_NAME := :P2_NEW_MANAGER;
:P3_BILLING_ADDRESS1 := :P2_NEW_MANAGER_STREET;
:P3_BILLING_ADDRESS2 := null;
:P3_BILLING_CITY := :P2_NEW_MANAGER_CITY;
:P3_BILLING_STATE := :P2_NEW_MANAGER_STATE;
:P3_BILLING_ZIP := :P2_NEW_MANAGER_ZIP;
:P3_BILLING_PHONE := :P2_MANAGER_PHONE_AC||'-'||:P2_MANAGER_PHONE_EX||'-'||:P2_MANAGER_PHONE_SC;
elsif :P3_BILLING_CODE = 'FH' then
:P3_BILLING_NAME := :P3_FUNERAL_HOME1;
:P3_BILLING_ADDRESS1 := :P3_FUNERAL_HOME_ADDRESS;
:P3_BILLING_CITY := :P3_FUNERAL_HOME_CITY;
:P3_BILLING_STATE := :P3_FUNERAL_HOME_STATE;
:P3_BILLING_ZIP := :P3_FUNERAL_HOME_ZIP;
:P3_BILLING_PHONE := :P3_FUNERAL_HOME_TELEPHONE;
end if;
update cm_burial set billing_name=:P3_BILLING_NAME, billing_address1=:P3_BILLING_ADDRESS1, billing_address2=:P3_BILLING_ADDRESS2, billing_city=:P3_BILLING_CITY, billing_state=:P3_BILLING_STATE, billing_zip=:P3_BILLING_ZIP, billing_phone=:P3_BILLING_PHONE
where recordid=:P3_RECORDID;
end;

Hello,
If I understand you correctly, it seems like your page logic is a bit problematic. The scenario I see is that the user is populating the form part, submiting the page, and the report region is being displayed (as the where clause depends on an item from the form region). Now, the situation you are describing, where the billing information is not correct, is possible if the user changed some of the form items on page 2, didn't submit the page – hence didn't update the report region – but still chose to branch to the next page, using the (non-updated) report link column. If I understand it correctly, you should first correct this situation. If the user is changing some details in the form section, the page should be re-submitted. This will resolve your problem, because as part of the page submit process, session state will be set correctly.
I believe this is the simplest and correct solution. Other options, like updating session state per changed item (using JavaScript) will be much more complicated.
Regards,
Arie.

SQLException, invalid cursor state

Came across the weirdest thing... Suppose i use this statement in a servlet:
ResultSet result = statement.executeQuery("SELECT City FROM Destinations");and the following code in the JSP to which the browser is redirected:
<select name="selectedCity" value="" size="1">
<% ResultSet result = (ResultSet) session.getAttribute("rstCity");
while (result.next()) { %>
<option><%= result.getString(1) %>
<% } %>
</select>This works properly in my case. (Don't think other code is necessary to provide... please tell me you think it is..)
But because result is full of duplicate rows, i want to change the line into:
ResultSet result = statement.executeQuery("SELECT DISTINCT City FROM Destinations");A ServletException and SQLException message in the browser (at index.jsp, not servlet/servletname!) both say [Micrisoft][ODBC Driver Manager]Invalid Cursor State...
Now if i (temporarily) remove the expression <%= result.getString(1) %> in the JSP file, the error no longer appears. Ofcourse the listbox <select> is now filled with about 100 empty <option>s...
I can't locate the problem this way, can't see any logic in this. It seems like by adding DISTINCT in the SQL statement, the JSP file cannot handle the getString function anymore.
Can anyone help me with this invalid cursor state thing?
Thanks!!

Peter,
I'm getting the same problem with this:
String sql = "SELECT DISTINCTROW collectedwho FROM steps WHERE status = 'overdue finish' AND escalatedwho = " + util.sqlEsc(username) + " ORDER BY collectedwho";
recordset rs = new recordset();
rs.open(sql);
while (rs.rs.next()) {
accountable = rs.rs.getString("collectedwho");
(recordset is simply my own wrapper for the ResultSet class, which hides the db connection string and saves me rewriting it every time)
What happens is that the loop falls off the end of the resultset but thinks that it hasn't, ie rs.next() returns true, but there's no data when it gets to the getString and it throws an "Invalid cursor state".
Bummer.
I'm using the JDBC:ODBC bridge to an access database, by the way.
I tried changing DISTINCT to to DISTINCTROW which then worked with no errors but of course gave me the wrong results in the ResultSet!
Is this a bug in the bridge, or in the ResultSet class?
Sorry this isn't much help but at least you know you're not the only one!
David

??? On Session State

Background info:
I have a field that could have two different types of input, one would be numeric (such as a PK) the other input to it would be text. To ensure the Automated Row Fetch always pulls the PK properly I am using a computation ON LOAD to turn the text into numeric so that when the Automatic Page Load runs it will always pull from the database based on the PK.
This part is working properly the problem is that I have an item that is a select list and it unforunately has an dynamic LOV with a query of select a,b from table_xyz where value = :session_state_of_pk
This is causing me a problem because it is referencing the "text value" and not the numeric value. Even though when I change my page view to "Events" the page rendering shows computations before Items. I even did a Pl/sql process ON LOAD to insert the :session_state value to a debug table.
So my question is ... If the pl/sql on load process is holding the correct value then why is the LOV of a page item not using the correct value??
This is the error I get on the page Item that is an LOV:Error: ORA-01722: invalid number performing List of Values query

Vikas, I have done this and here are the results:
.01: S H O W: application="110" page="103" workspace="" request="" session="6865688852817169"
0.01: Language derived from: FLOW_PRIMARY_LANGUAGE, current browser language: en-us
0.01: alter session set nls_language="AMERICAN"
0.01: alter session set nls_territory="AMERICA"
0.01: NLS: CSV charset=WE8MSWIN1252
0.02: ...NLS: Set Decimal separator="."
0.02: ...NLS: Set NLS Group separator=","
0.02: ...NLS: Set date format="DD-MON-RR"
0.02: ...Setting session time_zone to dbtimezone
0.02: NLS: Language=en-us
0.02: Application 110, Authentication: CUSTOM2, Page Template: 724212235889446
0.02: ...Supplied session ID can be used
0.02: ...Application session: 6865688852817169, user=JRP22
0.02: ...Determine if user "JRP22" workspace "1786101047996118" can develop application "110" in workspace "1786101047996118"
0.03: Session: Fetch session header information
<b>0.03: Saving g_arg_names=P103_IP_ID and g_arg_values=077.243
0.03: ...Session State: Save Item "P103_IP_ID" newValue="077.243" </b<"escape_on_input="N"
0.03: ...Metadata: Fetch page attributes for application 110, page 103
0.03: Fetch session state from database
0.04: Branch point: BEFORE_HEADER
0.04: Fetch application meta data
0.04: Authorization Check: "6961000503551770" User: "JRP22" Component: "PAGE"
0.06: Computation point: BEFORE_HEADER
<b>0.06: ...Perform computation of item: P103_IP_ID, type=QUERY
0.06: ...P103_IP_ID=select ip_id from IP where IP = :P103_IP_ID;
0.06: ...Session State: Saved Item "P103_IP_ID" New Value="32"
0.06: Processing point: BEFORE_HEADER
0.06: ...Process "TEST DB INSERT SESSION STATE P103_IP_ID": PLSQL (BEFORE_HEADER) insert into t (col1,col2,tstamp) values ('p395',:p103_ip_id,systimestamp);</b>
0.08: Show page template header
0.09: Computation point: AFTER_HEADER
0.09: Processing point: AFTER_HEADER
<b>0.09: ...Process "Fetch Row for IP": DML_FETCH_ROW (AFTER_HEADER) F|#OWNER#:IP:P103_IP_ID:IP_ID
</b>0.10: ...Process "Fetch DNS_NAME To Buffer": PLSQL (AFTER_HEADER) :P103_DNS_NAME_BUFFER := :P103_DNS_NAME;
0.11: ...Session State: Save Item "P103_DNS_NAME_BUFFER" newValue="3657" "escape_on_input="N"
0.11: ...Process "Get Next or Previous Primary Key Value": GET_NEXT_OR_PREV_PK (AFTER_HEADER) #OWNER#:IP:IP_ID::IP::P103_IP_ID:P103_IP_ID_NEXT:P103_IP_ID_PREV::::P103_IP_ID_COUNT:
0.13: ...Session State: Save Item "P103_IP_ID_NEXT" newValue="33" "escape_on_input="N"
0.13: ...Session State: Save Item "P103_IP_ID_PREV" newValue="31" "escape_on_input="N"
0.14: ...Session State: Save Item "P103_IP_ID_COUNT" newValue="32 of 3434" "escape_on_input="N"
0.14: ...Process "Fetch MAC_ADDRESS": PLSQL (AFTER_HEADER) select mac_address into :P103_MAC_ADDRESS from mac_address where IP_ID = :P103_IP_ID;
0.15: ...Session State: Save Item "P103_MAC_ADDRESS" newValue="00-16-3G-33-25-33" "escape_on_input="Y"
0.15: ...Process "Fetch Container_Type": PLSQL (AFTER_HEADER) select container_type into :P103_CONTAINER_TYPE from container_type where container_type_id = :P103_CONTAINER_TYPE_ID;
0.16: ...Session State: Save Item "P103_CONTAINER_TYPE" newValue="BASE_UNIT" "escape_on_input="Y"
0.16: ...Process "Populate Hidden Assign value": PLSQL (AFTER_HEADER) :P103_ASSIGNED_BUFFER := :P103_ASSIGNED;
0.16: ...Session State: Save Item "P103_ASSIGNED_BUFFER" newValue="Y" "escape_on_input="N"
0.16: Authorization Check: "4769021032313739" User: "JRP22" Component: "tab"
From Session State after the page has loaded:
Application Page Item Name Display Item Value Status
110 103 P103_IP_ID Hidden 32 U
Vikas: From the debug info you can the value comes in with the the IP ( I have removed the first two octets from the debug information) "Saving g_arg_names=P103_IP_ID and g_arg_values=077.243"
A few steps later a computation is performed and the IP is chagned to an IP_ID which the value is 32, this is correct at this point.. Following that there is a pl/sql insert of :P103_IP_ID and that value is 32 inside the db table.
Here is what it looks like on the screen:
<b>Any ideas why the Select List LOV does not like this value?</b>
Here is the actual LOV query:
select dns_name,dns_name_id from dns_name where ip_id = :p103_ip_id
Message was edited by:
Justin P

FPB7 Create Payment Lot after loading Manual Bank Statement

Hello Everyone,
My question is can we create payment lot after loading Manual Bank Statement(FF67).
Thanks,

Hi Imitiyaz,
Transaction code-FF67 (Manual bank statement) is used to enter the bank statement data manually via dynpro. Moreover, since it contains no front end controls so it can be called via batch. You need to develop a custom program to cater the requirement.
You can create a program which creates batch input sessions for transaction FF67. Use transaction SHDB to record the transaction in order to see program, dynpro and field names.
Hope it helps...
Thanks,
Amlan

Invalid call Statement method: {0} In sql server,please help me!

Connect to a sql server 2000 DB,and the table has a identity column.
Run the code below:
String strSql = "insert into attachments([FileName],FileLength,FileContent) values(?,?,?)";
PreparedStatement pstmt = connection.prepareStatement(strSql);
pstmt.setString(1,fileName);
pstmt.setInt(2,iFileLength);
pstmt.setString(3,'aaaa');
if(pstmt.executeUpdate()==1) {//succeed;
strSql = "select @@identity";//this code run good in the Query Analyzer.
ResultSet rs = pstmt.executeQuery(strSql);//exception thrown!!!!!!!!!!!!
if(rs.next()) {//succeed;
int i = rs.getInt(1);
throw a exception:Invalid call Statement method: {0}
thanks a lot!

If you really must re-use your prepared statement, then you'll have to clear the parameters associated with it.
pstmt.clearParameters();What's happening is that the statement is trying to re-apply the previously assigned parameters to a query with no placeholders.
I'd rather use an ordinary Statement in this case.
Dave

00900 Invalid SQL Statement error

I'm teaching myself to write stored procedures, working in TOAD 10.5 with Oracle 10g. I keep getting error ORA-00900: invalid SQL Statement. Here's the code, cut down to bare minimum sample size. I can't see where I'm doing anything wrong.
If I cut out the cursor (taking it down to just "Begin" and "End"), it does run, but I can't see anything wrong with the cursor.
Any ideas?
CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE IN_PROCESS_CASES_BOS
IS
V_HELLO VARCHAR2(10);
CURSOR C_MAIN IS
SELECT 'HELLO' FROM DUAL;
BEGIN
OPEN C_MAIN;
LOOP
FETCH C_MAIN INTO V_HELLO;
EXIT WHEN C_MAIN%NOTFOUND;
END LOOP;
CLOSE C_MAIN;
END;
END IN_PROCESS_CASES_BOS;
/

Hi,
You've got 2 END statements, but only 1 BEGIN.
It helps a lot if you indent your code, so that every END is right below its correspoding BEGIN, and all the code in between them is indented. The same goes for IF and LOOP statements.
When posting any formatted text on this site (not just code), type these 6 characters:
\(small letters only, inside curly brackets) before and after each section of formatted text, to preserve spacing.
Try this:CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE IN_PROCESS_CASES_BOS
IS
V_HELLO VARCHAR2(10);
CURSOR C_MAIN IS
SELECT 'HELLO' FROM DUAL;
BEGIN
OPEN C_MAIN;
LOOP
     FETCH C_MAIN INTO V_HELLO;
     EXIT WHEN C_MAIN%NOTFOUND;
END LOOP;
CLOSE C_MAIN;
END;                Lose this line
END IN_PROCESS_CASES_BOS;

Bea.jolt.ServiceException: Invalid Session

Good day to all!
I know that this is common problem, but if you kindly point me in the right direction, that would be more appreciated. I am currently running PT8.50 HRMS 9.1 DMO on Windows 7. The PIA is giving this error:
CHECK APPSERVER LOGS. THE SITE BOOTED WITH INTERNAL DEFAULT SETTINGS, BECAUSE OF: bea.jolt.ServiceException: Invalid Session
When logging in, I get that the app server is down. I am in familiar with why I see app server is down. I also believe that I understand why I am getting the above error. During installation, I put my own password for PTWEBSERVER as oppose to the default. I thought I updated the password with the default, but doesn't seem to work.
I also understand to check the appserver logs, but I am not familiar where it is located, so if 'I could get the location of these logs, I will post the log and that would confirm if it is a password issue, or not.
And if I need to uninstall and reinstall PIA, please tell me what I should do there. Thank you and Be Blessed

Thank you for that helpful tip. I misunderstood Bob's post then. I though the updating was only if the acct was locked (which it wasn't because I checked). In any rate, I did rerun the script and the script was successful. Just to be sure, I logged into datamover via bootstrap mode and just typed in exactly the command that was given. I didn't miss anything I am assuming correct?
I am still getting the same error message, even after updating the password. Here is the log, maybe this will help. Be Blessed
####<Nov 17, 2010 12:55:52 PM CST> <Notice> <Server> <Kelvin> <PIA> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1290020152368> <BEA-002613> <Channel "DefaultSecure[7]" is now listening on 0:0:0:0:0:0:0:1:443 for protocols iiops, t3s, ldaps, https.>
####<Nov 17, 2010 12:55:52 PM CST> <Notice> <Server> <Kelvin> <PIA> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1290020152368> <BEA-002613> <Channel "Default[4]" is now listening on fe80:0:0:0:0:100:7f:fffe:80 for protocols iiop, t3, ldap, snmp, http.>
####<Nov 17, 2010 12:55:52 PM CST> <Notice> <Server> <Kelvin> <PIA> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1290020152368> <BEA-002613> <Channel "Default[7]" is now listening on 0:0:0:0:0:0:0:1:80 for protocols iiop, t3, ldap, snmp, http.>
####<Nov 17, 2010 12:55:52 PM CST> <Notice> <Server> <Kelvin> <PIA> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1290020152368> <BEA-002613> <Channel "Default[3]" is now listening on fe80:0:0:0:1975:e9d2:ad58:81a3:80 for protocols iiop, t3, ldap, snmp, http.>
####<Nov 17, 2010 12:55:52 PM CST> <Notice> <Server> <Kelvin> <PIA> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1290020152368> <BEA-002613> <Channel "DefaultSecure" is now listening on 10.10.10.10:443 for protocols iiops, t3s, ldaps, https.>
####<Nov 17, 2010 12:55:52 PM CST> <Notice> <Server> <Kelvin> <PIA> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1290020152368> <BEA-002613> <Channel "DefaultSecure[5]" is now listening on fe80:0:0:0:741d:f596:ab4:94cd:443 for protocols iiops, t3s, ldaps, https.>
####<Nov 17, 2010 12:55:52 PM CST> <Notice> <Server> <Kelvin> <PIA> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1290020152368> <BEA-002613> <Channel "Default[5]" is now listening on fe80:0:0:0:741d:f596:ab4:94cd:80 for protocols iiop, t3, ldap, snmp, http.>
####<Nov 17, 2010 12:55:52 PM CST> <Notice> <Server> <Kelvin> <PIA> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1290020152368> <BEA-002613> <Channel "Default[2]" is now listening on fe80:0:0:0:818a:caaf:319d:8d73:80 for protocols iiop, t3, ldap, snmp, http.>
####<Nov 17, 2010 12:55:52 PM CST> <Notice> <WebLogicServer> <Kelvin> <PIA> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1290020152368> <BEA-000329> <Started WebLogic Admin Server "PIA" for domain "INNOVATI" running in Production Mode>
####<Nov 17, 2010 12:55:52 PM CST> <Warning> <Server> <Kelvin> <PIA> <DynamicSSLListenThread[DefaultSecure]> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1290020152368> <BEA-002611> <Hostname "Kelvin", maps to multiple IP addresses: 10.10.10.10, fe80:0:0:0:ad0e:4847:e1ac:9d13%23>
####<Nov 17, 2010 12:55:52 PM CST> <Info> <EJB> <Kelvin> <PIA> <[STANDBY] ExecuteThread: '3' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1290020152977> <BEA-010008> <EJB Deploying file: mejb.jar>
####<Nov 17, 2010 12:55:55 PM CST> <Notice> <WebLogicServer> <Kelvin> <PIA> <Main Thread> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1290020155629> <BEA-000365> <Server state changed to RUNNING>
####<Nov 17, 2010 12:55:57 PM CST> <Notice> <WebLogicServer> <Kelvin> <PIA> <Main Thread> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1290020157204> <BEA-000360> <Server started in RUNNING mode>
####<Nov 17, 2010 12:56:06 PM CST> <Info> <EJB> <Kelvin> <PIA> <[STANDBY] ExecuteThread: '3' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1290020166611> <BEA-010009> <EJB Deployed EJB with JNDI name ejb.mgmt.MEJB.>
####<Nov 17, 2010 1:35:20 PM CST> <Info> <ServletContext-> <Kelvin> <PIA> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<anonymous>> <> <> <1290022520267> <BEA-000000> <ERROR: WebProfile loading internal default settings because of an Exception while communicating with "kelvin:9000">
####<Nov 17, 2010 1:35:33 PM CST> <Info> <ServletContext-> <Kelvin> <PIA> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '1' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<anonymous>> <> <> <1290022533121> <BEA-000000> <ERROR: WebProfile loading internal default settings because of an Exception while communicating with "kelvin:9000">
Edited by: 792295 on Nov 17, 2010 11:41 AM

Format Mask in Session state

In a Summary Region (Page 6) I have changed one field to text, edited the field with no format mask. In the entry form on the pervious page, the column properties are Database Column, and Always replace value in Session State with the Money format Mask.(Page 5).
10313 5 P5_LPP Text $66.67 LPP
10313 6 P6_ENGAGER_LPP Text Field $66.67 I
Question is that the field in field 6 displays the value $66.67. Why not 66.67?
On Page 6 a user can press the Update_lpp button and Invalid Number Error Page pops up?
Is there a way to hold in the session state the values only while formatting on the screen is $'
Thanks

Thanks. I did an "on submit and before computation" process that did a SQL replace on the page item. The DML process then successfully inserted the value into the database.
Alex.

Session State Protection Violation error

I am developing my first Apex application. I have this page which has been running fine until I made some changes. The error I get is the following:
-----Error message:
Session state protection violation. This may be caused by manual alteration of a URL containing a checksum or by using a link with an incorrect or missing checksum. If you are unsure what caused this error, please contact the application administrator for assistance.
--End of error message.
This happens Whenever the page is submitted for process, e.g. when I select from a "LOV with Submit" item or when I click the "Save Changes" button. It is fine if the button redirects to another page. Using Debug, I saw that the error occurs right after "Fetch page attributes" and before "Fetch session state from database".
About the changes I made before this error first surfaced: nothing to do with session state protection and nothing I can think of that is related to session state protection. In fact, I did not specify any session state protection at any level at this stage. That is, all pages and items are unrestricted. I did add a javascript to the page which is invoked onChange of an item to update another item. I made the same changes (except for the Javascript) to another similar page which is still running fine.
I tried logging out of Apex (I am using OracleXE) and getting back on, the error still persists. I even shut down and restart the Apex database to no avail.
Can anyone point me to where it might be the cause of this problem? Thank your help and/or suggestions in advance.
Message was edited by:
muighi

Scott - I should have posted this question sooner! I wasted a whole day trying to figure this out. Thanks a lot, Scott. By the way, where can I find any documented known bugs in Apex?
--Candy

Lots of SSOExceptions: Invalid session state

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for