LOV problem with multiple return values.

I created a ViewObject and in it a transient attribute.
I create a ViewAccessor for another field and a LOV for it (default InputText with Lov Value).
In List Return Values I added also my tranient attribute in order to receive another attribute from the accesor VO.
When I run it from the Application browser I see my transient attribute emtpty even if the "source" attribute is not empty.
If I change the value from the LOV the source value changes bit the transient is still empty.
What's wrong ?
Tks
Tullio

Repost.

Similar Messages

LOV Problem with multiple values

HI All,
I have a problem with LOV .When ever i click LOV after search button all values are displaying fine.
But when i get so many values i want to select only one vlaue that is not cmng to the main page ....Cursor is in running state always after that time out error is coming in my application .
This problem is coming with with only single value selection in lOV only problem with Multiple values retrival that time only...
(Iam using 11.1.1.3 Jdeveloper.)
Thanx in advance...

duplicate of {thread:id=2286814}

CreateInsert and LOV with multiple return values

HI. I am on Build JDEVADF_11.1.2.3.0_GENERIC_120914.0223.6276.1
I have a View Object which is based on Entity Object.
View Object has customer_name and customer_id attributes.
customer_name attribute has LOV (input field with LOV) based on some other View Object (which of caurse holds customer name and customer id data)
I defined that when LOV return the chosen values it will populate customer_name with "Customer Name" value and customer_id with "Customer Id" value
All atributes are updatable
I droped my View Object on the page and also "CreateInsert" buton. When I click on "CreateInsert" button, I can see new row added as expected, customer_name field has LOV. I can choose from LOV and can see customers and customer_id data. But when I click OK in the LOV pop-up only customer_name attribute is populated!
I do see that customer_id is returned from LOV (I implemented ReturnPopupEvent listener), but still the customer id remains empty.
I though maybe I need to add LOV as auto submit = true and set LOV to be a partial trigger for customer_id. But still - it didn't help
However, if I run Application Module tester, I do get what I want. I can create new row and when I change customer name , both customer name and customer id fields are populated
Please advice

Hi Michael,
On Lov VO, make sure you have at least one or combination of attributes as Key attribute. and re test.
Thanks,
Jeet

Problem with the return value from a tablemodel after filtering

I have a form (consult that return a value) with a jtextfield and a jtable. when the user types in the textfield, the textfield call a method to filter the tablemodel.
everything works fine, but after filtering the model, the references are lost and the return value does not match with the selected row.
I read that convertColumnIndexToView, convertRowIndexToView, vertColumnIndexToModel and convertRowIndexToModel, solve the problem, but I used all and nothing.
**** This is the code to fill the jtable
DefaultTableModel modelo=(DefaultTableModel)this.jTable1.getModel();
while(rs.next()){
Object[] fila= new Object[2];
fila[0]=rs.getObject("id_categoria");
fila[1]=rs.getObject("nombre");
modelo.addRow(fila);
this.jTable1.getColumnModel().removeColumn(this.jTable1.getColumnModel().getColumn(0));
// I delete the first column because is a ID, I dont want that the user see it. the value is only for me**** this is the method to filter from the jtextfield
private void FiltrarJtable1() {
TableRowSorter sorter = new TableRowSorter(this.jTable1.getModel());
sorter.setRowFilter(RowFilter.regexFilter("^"+this.jTextField1.getText().toUpperCase(), 1));
this.jTable1.setRowSorter(sorter);
this.jTable1.convertRowIndexToModel(0);
}*** this is the method that return the ID (id_categoria) from the tablemodel
private void SeleccionarRegistro(){
if(this.jTable1.getSelectedRow()>-1){
String str_id =this.jTable1.getModel().getValueAt(this.jTable1.getSelectedRow(),0).toString();
int_idtoreturn=Integer.parseInt(str_id);
this.dispose();
}else{
JOptionPane.showMessageDialog(this,"there are no records selected","Warning!",1);
}Who I can solve this problem?

m_ilio wrote:
I have a form (consult that return a value) with a jtextfield and a jtable. when the user types in the textfield, the textfield call a method to filter the tablemodel.
everything works fine, but after filtering the model, the references are lost and the return value does not match with the selected row.
I read that convertColumnIndexToView, convertRowIndexToView, vertColumnIndexToModel and convertRowIndexToModel, solve the problem, but I used all and nothing.
You're right in that you have to use convertRowIndexToModel(), but you are using it wrong. That method takes as input the index of a row in the view, i.e. the table, and returns the corresponding row in the underlying TableModel. No data is changed by the call, so this:
this.jTable1.convertRowIndexToModel(0);is meaningless by itself.
What you need to do is the following:
int selectedRow = this.jTable1.getSelectedRow(); // This is the selected row in the view
if (selectedRow >= 0) {
int modelRow = this.jTable1.convertRowIndexToModel(selectedRow); // This is the corresponding row in the model
String str_id =this.jTable1.getModel().getValueAt(modelRow, 0).toString();
}Hope this helps.

Webservice : problem with Base64 returned value

Hello all,
We are calling a webservice from a Flex2 application.
When the returned value does not contain accentuated letters,
we receive the value "as-is", everything is OK.
When there is at least one accent, the result is
automatically Base64 encoded by the server, and the
xsi:type="n2:base64 is specified in the XML answer.
The problem is that Flex2 does not Base64 decode the returned
string, ans we cannot get the right value.
We do not think that the problem is on the server, because we
tryied to use 2 other webservice clients, and they worked well.
We wonder if Flex2 can handle Base64 encoding on Webservice
results or not.
We thought abut using the Base64 decoder class, but it won't
work because the result if not *always* Base64 encoded (depending
if it contains some chars or not).
Is there any solution to this issue ? If it can help, I paste
the XML returned by the server at the end of this message.
Thank you for your help.
MiF
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:xsd="
http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
xmlns:env="
http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"
xmlns:xsi="
http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<env:Body>
<n1:GetArticleResponse xmlns:n1="urn:ActionWebService"
env:encodingStyle="
http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding/">
<return xmlns:n2="
http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding/"
xsi:type="n2:base64">PD94bWwgdmVyc2lvbj0iMS4xIiBlbmNvZGluZz0iSVNPLTg4NTktMSI/Pgo8
YXJ0aWNsZXM+CiAgPGFydGljbGU+CiAgICA8aWQ+MTwvaWQ+CiAgICA8Y29k
ZT5NaXRjaDwvY29kZT4KICA8L2FydGljbGU+CiAgPGFydGljbGU+CiAgICA8
aWQ+MjwvaWQ+CiAgICA8Y29kZT5Qb2xvPC9jb2RlPgogIDwvYXJ0aWNsZT4K
ICA8YXJ0aWNsZT4KICAgIDxpZD4zPC9pZD4KICAgIDxjb2RlPkvpa+k8L2Nv
ZGU+CiAgPC9hcnRpY2xlPgo8L2FydGljbGVzPgo=</return>
</n1:GetArticleResponse>
</env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

You should use cast_to_varchar2 regardless what is source of base64_encode.
Because base64-value consists of single byte ASCII-characters.

Problem with Bapi_po_Getdetail return values

We have developed a web service in asp.net to get the details of a particular purchase order number calling Bapi_po_Getdetail. The input parameters that we pass are:
string ITEMS = X
string PURCHASEORDER= <purchase order number>
But when we debug and check the return values from the bapi, BAPIEKPO Table doesnt have any data, it is null.
Could someone help us, please?

Please initialize the BAPIEKPOTable bedore call. Passing null allways returns null.
NCo:
string ITEMS = X
string PURCHASEORDER= <purchase order number>
BAPIEKPOTable result = new BAPIEKPOTable();
proxy.Bapi_po_Getdetail(ITEMS, PURCHASEORDER, ref result);
Soap Processor / Web Service Wizard
string ITEMS = X
string PURCHASEORDER= <purchase order number>
BAPIEKPO[] result = new BAPIEKPO[0];
proxy.Bapi_po_Getdetail(ITEMS, PURCHASEORDER, ref result);

Mapping problem with Multiple destination values

Hi,
I recently started to work on SAP MDM as a beginner. I am posting this message to get some help to solve the problems that I encountered as I run the SAP.
For example, we can sub-categorize a 'Product' as Food>ProcessedFood>Frozen Food>Pizzas'. However, notice that there exist the sameNode name under the 'Commodity' as following two categories show.
Product>Food>Processed Food>Frozen Food>Pizzas
Commodity>Food>Processed Food>Frozen Food>Pizzas
The Node name, 'Pizzas', under two different categories has fewattributes such as A, B, C, and D. When I tried mapping these attributes at Map Field/Values Tab under the import manager, I ended up getting warning messages due to the overlapping.
The message says "One or more of the source values were mapped to multiplz destination values. Some of the mapped destination values may need to be unmapped before performing the import."
Does anyone have an idea to solve this overlapping problem?
I will really appreciate your answer.
Edited by: coolpsy on Jun 8, 2010 4:27 AM
Edited by: coolpsy on Jun 8, 2010 7:55 AM

Hi,
As per my understanding, there are two categories as shown by you
Product>Food>Processed Food>Frozen Food>Pizzas
Commodity>Food>Processed Food>Frozen Food>Pizzas
and you want to link Attributes with specific correct Category say Product not with Commodity. So in order to avoid overlapping, try using option Split Hierarchy. For more details Please refer below Article: refer page 11-15/20
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/308c62a2-5faa-2a10-fda6-fa4aa7169734?quicklink=index&overridelayout=true
Also refer, http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/6090d0bd-1da7-2a10-468f-bdd17badb396?quicklink=index&overridelayout=true
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/8090941f-a5a7-2a10-3ba6-b4af5ec6d97b?quicklink=index&overridelayout=true
Just check and revert with Result if it helps..
Regards,
Mandeep Saini

Multiple return values (Bug-ID 4222792)

I had exactly the same request for the same 3 reasons: strong type safety and code correctness verification at compile-time, code readability and ease of mantenance, performance.
Here is what Sun replied to me:
Autoboxing and varargs are provided as part of
JSRs 14 and 201
http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=14
http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=201
See also:
http://forum.java.sun.com/forum.jsp?forum=316
http://developer.java.sun.com/developer/earlyAccess/adding_generics/index.html
Multiple return values is covered by Bug-ID 4222792
Typically this is done by returning an array.
http://developer.java.sun.com/developer/bugParade/bugs/4222792.html
That's exactly the problem: we dynamically create instances of array objects that would better fit well within the operand stack without stressing the garbage collector with temporary Array object instances (and with their backing store: 2 separate allocations that need to be recycled when it is clearly a pollution that the operand stack would clean up more efficiently)
If you would like to engage in a discussion with the Java Language developers, the Generics forum would be a better place:
http://forum.java.sun.com/forum.jsp?forum=316
I know that (my report was already refering to the JSR for language extension) Generics is not what I was refering to (even if a generic could handle multiple return values, it would still be an allocated Object
instance to pack them, i.e. just less convenient than using a static class for type safety.
The most common case of multiple return values involve values that have known static datatypes and that should be checked with strong typesafety.
The simple case that involves returning two ints then will require at least two object instances and will not solve the garbage collection overhead.
Using a array of variable objects is exactly similar, except that it requires two instances for the components and one instance for the generic array container. Using extra method parameters with Integer, Byte, ... boxing objects is more efficient, but for now the only practical solution (which causes the least pollution in the VM allocator and garbage collector) is to use a custom class to store the return values in a single instance.
This is not natural, and needlessly complexifies many interfaces.
So to avoid this pollution, some solutions are used such as packing two ints into a long and returning a long, depacking the long after return (not quite clean but still much faster at run-time for methods that need to be used with high frequencies within the application. In some case, the only way to cut down the overhead is to inline methods within the caller code, and this does not help code maintenance by splitting the implementation into small methods (something that C++ can do very easily, both because it supports native types parameters by reference, and because it also supports inline methods).
Finally, suppose we don't want to use tricky code, difficult to maintain, then we'll have to use boxing Object types to allow passing arguments by reference. Shamely boxed native types cannot be allocated on the operand stack as local variables, so we need to instanciate these local variables before call, and we loose the capacity to track the cases where these local variables are not really initialized by an effective call to the method that will assign them. This does not help debugging, and is against the concept of a strongly typed language like Java should be:
Java makes lots of efforts to track uninitialized variables, but has no way to determine if an already instanciated Object instance refered in a local variable has effectively received an effective assignment because only the instanciation is kept. A typical code will then need to be written like this:
Integer a = null;
Integer b = null;
if (some condition) {
//call.method(a, b, 0, 1, "dummy input arg");
// the method is supposed to have assigned a value to a and b,
// but can't if a and b have not been instanciated, so we perform:
call.method(a = new Integer(), b = new Integer(), 0, 1, "dummy input
arg");
// we must suppose that the method has modified (not initialized!)
the value
// of a and b instances.
now.use(a.value(), b.value())
// are we sure here that a and b have received a value????
// the code may be detected at run-time (a null exception)
// or completely undetected (the method() above was called but it
// forgot to assign a value to its referenced objects a and b, in which
// case we are calling in fact: now.use(0, 0); with the default values
// or a and b, assigned when they were instanciated)
Very tricky... Hard to debug. It would be much simpler if we just used:
int a;
int b;
if (some condition) {
(a, b) = call.method(0, 1, "dummy input arg");
now.use(a, b);
The compiler would immediately detect the case where a and b are in fact not always initialized (possible use bere initialization), and the first invoked call.method() would not have to check if its arguments are not null, it would not compile if it forgets to return two values in some code path...
There's no need to provide extra boxing objects in the source as well as at run-time, and there's no stress added to the VM allocator or garbage collector simply because return values are only allocated on the perand stack by the caller, directly instanciated within the callee which MUST (checked at compile-time) create such instances by using the return statement to instanciate them, and the caller now just needs to use directly the variables which were referenced before call (here a and b). Clean and mean. And it allows strong typechecking as well (so this is a real help for programmers.
Note that the signature of the method() above is:
class call {
(int, int) method(int, int, String) { ... }
id est:
class "call", member name "method", member type "(IILjava.lang.string;)II"
This last signature means that the method can only be called by returning the value into a pair of variables of type int, or using the return value as a pair of actual arguments for another method call such as:
call.method(call.method("dummy input arg"), "other dummy input arg")
This is strongly typed and convenient to write and debug and very efficient at run-time...

Can anyone give me some real-world examples where
multiple return values aren't better captured in a
class that logically groups those values? I can of
course give hundreds of examples for why it's better
to capture method arguments as multiple values instead
of as one "logical object", but whenever I've hankered
for multiple return values, I end up rethinking my
strategy and rewriting my code to be better Object
Oriented.I'd personally say you're usually right. There's almost always a O-O way of avoiding the situation.
Sometimes though, you really do just want to return "two ints" from a function. There's no logical object you can think of to put them in. So you end up polluting the namespace:
public class MyUsefulClass {
public TwoInts calculateSomething(int a, int b, int c) {
public static class TwoInts {
    //now, do I use two public int fields here, making it
    //in essence a struct?
   //or do I make my two ints private & final, which
   //requires a constructor & two getters?
//and while I'm at it, is it worth implementing
//equals(), how about hashCode()? clone()?
//readResolve() ?
}The answer to most of the questions for something as simple as "TwoInts" is usually "no: its not worth implementing those methods", but I still have to think about them.
More to the point, the TwoInts class looks so ugly polluting the top level namespace like that, MyUsefulClass.TwoInts is public, that I don't think I've ever actually created that class. I always find some way to avoid it, even if the workaround is just as ugly.
For myself, I'd like to see some simple pass-by-value "Tuple" type. My fear is it'd be abused as a way for lazy programmers to avoid creating objects when they should have a logical type for readability & maintainability.
Anyone who has maintained code where someone has passed in all their arguments as (mutable!) Maps, Collections and/or Arrays and "returned" values by mutating those structures knows what a nightmare it can be. Which I suppose is an argument that cuts both ways: on the one hand you can say: "why add Tuples which would be another easy thing to abuse", on the other: "why not add Tuples, given Arrays and the Collections framework already allow bad programmers to produce unmainable mush. One more feature isn't going to make a difference either way".
Ho hum.

Difficulty in creating a chart by using a function with a returned value

Hi,
I am having a problem in using own function to create chart a with a returned value as the chart. If not using the returned value, it works fine.
Is this a known issue?

If you share some code, we might be able to help you.

Problem with multiple Toplink/JPA apps in same server

Anyone have experence of running serveral Toplink/ EJB-3 Web apps in the same server (OC4J, alas)?
We seem to get a problem with the second app failing to initialise toplink, with an entity not found message. Each app runs OK on it's own.

Yes, they access the same datasource and most of the tables overlap.
We're thinking it might help to have common entity classes and put them in a shared library, but I don't know if this is relevant (setting up shared libraries complicates testing and tends to snowball, I reckon we need about 15 jars all told).
I''ve had some funnies on OC4J before which I think may be to do with it's use of ClassLoaders, for example I initially put persistence.xml in the libary jar with the data model, but for some reason I get the entity not found error that way. It only seems to work if it's in the classes folder.
For the moment we're getting arround the problem with multiple OC4J instances in the server.

How to populate right side of Shuttle with display/return values?

Hello,
I know, that the proper way to populate the right side of shuttle is that:
declare
     v_list     apex_application_global.vc_arr2;
begin
     select profile_name return_value
       bulk     collect
       into     v_list
       from     user_profiles
      where     user_id = :p61_user_id;
     return (apex_util.table_to_string (v_list));
end;It is comfortable for the user to see the name of the profile.
However, I need a profile_id as a return value, like I have it on the left side of the shuttle.
The left side of the shuttle is populated with a select list with display/return values, as you know.
I need both sides of the shuttle to return profile_id in order to create a merge.
How is it possible to populate the right side of the Shuttle with display/return values?

All you have to do is to use the subset of shuttle query to assign value to the right side shuttle.
http://apex.oracle.com/pls/apex/f?p=50942:95
I have created a dummy page with shuttle query
SELECT ename, empno FROM emp ORDER by 1then I have defined a pl-sql before header process to assign values to shuttle variable
using the code
begin
:P95_SHUTTLE := '7566:219:7900:7782:90';
end;since 90 is not one the result set of the shuttle query it is getting displayed as number, and for others it is displaying the text. Thanks.
--Manish

How to create a procedure function with a return value of ref cursor?

Can anybody provide a sample about how to create a procedure function with a return value of REF CURSOR?
I heard if I can create a function to return a ref cursor, I can use VB to read its recordset.
Thanks a lot.

http://osi.oracle.com/~tkyte/ResultSets/index.html

Problem with multiple versions of documents being published with 001, 002, etc.

I am using Contribute CS3. I am having a problem with multiple versions of documents being published on the sever with 001, 002, etc in the name. So that I end up with 2 or 3 versions of a document on the server. Does anyone know why / how Contribute is doing this? Thanks for any help you can give.

Your Web site administrator will need to update your key to allow you to delete files you are able to edit.

Problems with multiple idocs in one file ( Inbound file )

HI,
Thanks in Advance for your suggestions.. Highly appreciated.
We have problems with multiple IDocs in one file.
We are using XIB ( Amtrix ) as Middleware to receive the files.
Curretenly When the file contains one IDoc then there is no problem. IDoc is created and everything is ok.
If file contains two IDocs ( for example two messages ORDERS and DELVERY ) then it is creating two IDocs but both IDocs contains ORDERS plus DELIVERY segements information. That is the problem. Some how SAP unable to differentiate the IDocs in the file.. But it knows that how many idocs are there in the file..because it is creating exact number of idocs.
We are using TRFC port ... Do I need to change it to File port..
When we have more than one idoc do we need set any parameter in the file ...

Thanks for the swift response. Always ideas are useful.
As of now , Middleware cannot split the file.
Thing is SAP is creating two Idocs with different message types. Problem is First IDoc contains ORDERS message type but also DELIVERY segments as well. Second IDoc with DELIVERY message tyoe but ORDERS segments as well... This is the problem... I think we are missing some field activation in file for EDIDC record.
As far as I know file port supports the number of IDocs in one file.. Hope TRFC port also supports that

Problem with multiple forms and subview

I have a problem when using NetBean Web Pack (JDK6, Net Beans 5.5, JSF 1.2).
1) I created a JSF page (hello.jsp) and a page fragment (header.jspf) inside Web Pack, and let the JSF page (hello.jsp) includes the page fragment.
2) The include instruction is outside of the "form" element id=main_form() of the first JSF page.
3) Inside the page fragment (header.jspf), I put a form (id=header_form) with some input fields inside the "subview" element.
4) When running the web application, the form and its children (id=header_form) inside the subview are not rendered.
It seems to be a problem with multiple forms on a page and the subview.
Do I use these JSF components incorrectly? Any advice?
Thanks

The forms are not nested.
hello.jsp
<webuijsf:body ...>

<div style="margin: 0px 0px 10px 0px; left: 0px; top: 0px">
<jsp:directive.include file="Header.jspf"/>
</div>

<webuijsf:form ...>
From above fragment, you can see the header.jspf is outside of the form element.

LOV problem with multiple return values.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for