Mailbox and Library Size Limits and Reporting

I have seen quite a few postings on size limits.
I have a system that has two Post Offices - one for mail and one for doc mgt. Users log into the e-mail PO and get redirected to the doc mgt PO when they need to access files in the libraries ( there are 6 libraries)
I would like to find a utility other than GW Check - maybe a nice Windows GUI app that lists the amount of space each user is using in each PO (or total) that would include all e-mails, sent and received (with attachments) and documents in the libraries.
I would also like to apply space limits to each user. "Client Options" sets it globally, but for each DOM or PO separately, and of course, you can be more granular on a per user basis. Setting the limit on a per user basis is daunting since it has to be done one at a time!
Is there a utility that not only reports consumed space, but also allows you to set the limits?
BTW, why are the disk space limits under the "Send" section of Client Options. Seems like it would be more of an "Environment" option.
Using GW 7.02HP on NW 6.5.6
Many thanks,
Charlie Riale, B.E.E.,CNE6
CARiale at bnetinc.com
www bnetinc com
610-645-7616 (Work)
610-645-7617 (Fax)

I'm not sure of any utilities that do a "report and set" of the limits. The GWCheck Log File Parser that Dave Parkes wrote (Caledonia Network Consulting) works well for seeing how much space a user has in use. That said, you CANNOT set limits on users in the DMS - just isn't possible. It's a different system, and does not allow for size limits of documents, etc.
As for why size limits is located under "sent" I guess it's because it really affects the sending of mail the most. I.e., when a user reaches the size limit, incoming mail is not bounced. The size limit only prevents users from sending new mail until additional space is cleaned up.
Danita

Similar Messages

  • Nio ByteBuffer and memory-mapped file size limitation

    I have a question/issue regarding ByteBuffer and memory-mapped file size limitations. I recently started using NIO FileChannels and ByteBuffers to store and process buffers of binary data. Until now, the maximum individual ByteBuffer/memory-mapped file size I have needed to process was around 80MB.
    However, I need to now begin processing larger buffers of binary data from a new source. Initial testing with buffer sizes above 100MB result in IOExceptions (java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Map failed).
    I am using 32bit Windows XP; 2GB of memory (typically 1.3 to 1.5GB free); Java version 1.6.0_03; with -Xmx set to 1280m. Decreasing the Java heap max size down 768m does result in the ability to memory map larger buffers to files, but never bigger than roughly 500MB. However, the application that uses this code contains other components that require the -xMx option to be set to 1280.
    The following simple code segment executed by itself will produce the IOException for me when executed using -Xmx1280m. If I use -Xmx768m, I can increase the buffer size up to around 300MB, but never to a size that I would think I could map.
    try
    String mapFile = "C:/temp/" + UUID.randomUUID().toString() + ".tmp";
    FileChannel rwChan = new RandomAccessFile( mapFile, "rw").getChannel();
    ByteBuffer byteBuffer = rwChan.map( FileChannel.MapMode.READ_WRITE,
    0, 100000000 );
    rwChan.close();
    catch( Exception e )
    e.printStackTrace();
    I am hoping that someone can shed some light on the factors that affect the amount of data that may be memory mapped to/in a file at one time. I have investigated this for some time now and based on my understanding of how memory mapped files are supposed to work, I would think that I could map ByteBuffers to files larger than 500MB. I believe that address space plays a role, but I admittedly am no OS address space expert.
    Thanks in advance for any input.
    Regards- KJ

    See the workaround in http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=4724038

  • Dual library question (iTunes gets the library size and bitrate wrong)

    I have two libraries, one ripped in Lossless, and the other in AAC at 256 kbps. I use one for streaming, and the other for syncing to our iPods. I just switched from the Lossless library to the AAC library (kept on separate drives). iTunes now sees the AAC files, but incorrectly lists all the bitrates as their higher Lossless numbers. However, when I click on an individual song to play it, the bitrate appropriately is recognized as 256 kbps. When I do this, the total library size (listed at the bottom) also incrementally "shrinks."
    The problem is that I just purchased a new 80 GB iPod capable of holding the entire library (nearly 8000 songs@25 kbps, ~60 GB total size). Unfortunately, iTunes still thinks the library is much larger (using the incorrect lossless bitrates to calculate file size). This results in it telling me (erroneously) that the library is too large to sync.
    Is there an easy way to get iTunes to realize the new file sizes? I could obviously double-click on each and every song in the library until iTunes "gets" the real size, but I assume there's a better way. I also assume that this will be an issue every time I switch between the two libraries.
    Help, anyone? Thanks in advance.
    KK
    iMac G5, Mini, PB G4   Mac OS X (10.4.6)  

    Thanks for the tip, but this didn't work, unfortunately. Following your lead a bit further, I even created a new playlist and dragged the whole library there, but the wrong bitrates (and thus, playlist size) still appeared.
    One more curious update regarding this situation. iTunes automatically populated my iPod with what it believed was a subset of my tunes that would fit on the iPod. The real size of this subset was ~20GB, but iTunes thought (using the Lossless size) that it was nearly 60 GB. In categorizing the contents of my iPod, it listed ~60GB of songs, ~1 MB of photos, 1 GB of video and still listed the space available as ~50 GB (for a grand total of ~112 GB of space on my 80 GB iPod). Clearly, iTunes used the calculated size to estimate the music content, but used the actual space remaining based on a query of the iPod drive. Strange, huh?
    I'm still looking for advice--any other suggestions would be welcome.
    KK

  • Mailbox and user report

    Is there anyway within exchange to run a report of all mailboxes, and the mailbox owner (i.e. the domain account), and the domain accounts status (i.e. enabled/disabled/non-exisitant ie deleted from AD). trying to determine orphaned mailboxes of exemployees.
    If there is an easier way to do this please let me know.

    Hey
    This command will help you get the list of disconnected mailbox - you can modify the same to get the other results.
    Get-MailboxStatistics | Where-Object {$_.DisconnectDate –notlike ‘’} | select Displayname, Database
    Syed MM Messaging SME - IBM || MCTS || MCSE || MCSA || VCP5 || VCA ||

  • Size Limits to xmlgen.insertXML and Steves XMLLoader

    Hi,
    What are the size limits are for xmlgen.insertXML? Can you only insert a varchar sized document? i.e. not a clob directly? - It always seems to fail past a certain document size (about 1600 records of a table with one number column)
    I've also tried using XMLLoader from Steves book - but that failed on large tables too. (12,000 records and 20 columns).
    Any help much appreciated!
    Simon.
    null

    Hi,
    As everyone knows ;-) there is no memory probems in java, but...
    I was able load clobs and long varchar2 columns into the database, but it used to hung from time to time - I'm using the XSQL commandLine and servlet on both unix and NT.
    I've found out that some of the problems are related to the jdk, the hunging problem on mass load was solved when I moved to jdk 1.2.2... and no version earlier, also I think I've installed a solaris patch relating to java, but I don't realy remember.
    By the way, If you are using clobs try using thin driver instead of oci8 driver it solve some problems for me.
    It it always worse checking your rollback segments and so.
    Hadar

  • After installing Aperture and leaving photos in iPhoto library, why did iphoto library size almost double?

    I installed Aperture and chose to leave all my images in the iPhoto library until I became more comfortable/familiar with Aperture.
    I was looking at my hard drive space and see that the available space went way down.  In Finder, the Aperture library.ap library is 17.97 gb and the iPhoto library is 122.75 gb.
    When I open iPhoto, it says that it contains 19349 images/87 gb.
    What happened?  Is that extra size related to the Aperture referencing the images?  Should I delete and start over, and move all the images into Aperture so that they are managed there?
    I'm just figuring my way around Aperture, and I'm trying not to over-think the organizational differences, but this size discrepancy seems a bit too much.

    I wish I had more info for this but I'm stumped. As I said there is no reason Aperture would increase the iPhoto library size by importing iPhoto's library.
    BTW how did you do the import, that might shed some light on the problem.
    The image count between the backup and the live iPhoto libraries seems fairly consistent so why the jump in size I can't say. And as for the increase in the number of images in Aperture, you started with an empty Aperture library, correct? And did you import anything directly into Aperture since you did the iPhoto import?
    I'm still a little confused on the whole thing where Aperture shows both original and edited versions of an image, and some show both RAW & JPEG versions of an image,
    Well Aperture really doesn't show both the original and edited versions, all you ever see are the versions unless you specifically ask to see the master. When you import an image into Aperture a version of the master is automatically made and displayed. Because at this point the version is no different then the master (you haven't made any adjustments to it yet) the version looks exactly like the master but it is the version you are seeing.
    As for the RAW & JPG thing, if you shoot both RAW + JPG's in your camera when you import them you have the choice of which to make the master or to make each one a master. Not sure if that is what you are referring to.
    I'm wondering whether I would have been better off just moving the whole iPhoto library into Aperture at the beginning, and deleting the iPhoto library.
    That is definitly one option and the option most users who switch eventually make. You're not going to want to have both programs handeling your photos. But you should probably hold off until you;re more omfortable with Aperture and make sure you have a good backup of the iPhoto library before you do anything.
    Remember when you import the iPhoto library into Aperture you're only choice is to copy the images not move them. This is done so that you can make sure all went OK before doing anything with iPhoto.
    If you have the room you could try bringing in the iPhoto library backup, and trying the import again into a new empty Aperture library.
    regards

  • IPhoto crashed during file transfer. Cannot recover photos by rebuilding the library and there is library size discrepancies.

    Hi,
    I am using an iPhone 4S and running iPhoto '09 version 8.1.2 (204) on OS X (version 10.9.2).
    I was transferring photos from my iPhone to iPhotos with the option of deleting the originals on the phone after transfer. IPhoto crashed at some point and I had to "Force quit" the application.
    Now, 3/4 th of all my pics is deleted on my iPhone and they are not in iPhoto either! I tried repairing and rebuilding the library as suggested elsewhere on this forum but nothing has worked.
    The library size is currently 11.6 GB but the rebuilt library is 5.6 GB.  I think the library was around 5 GB as well before transfer. I also tried using the "iPhoto library  manager" to rebuild the library. There is no difference between the pictures in the rebuilt library and the default library, but again the new, rebuilt one is 11.6 GB and the library it uses for rebuilding 5.6 GB! So, I think the pictures are there somewhere but I am not recovering it.
    Any suggestions as to how to recover deleted photos from my iPhone or to restore the iPhoto library would be muc appreciated.
    Many thanks,
    P.S. I do not have a recent iTunes or iCloud backup.

    If you sync photos between the Mac and other devices via iTunes there will be an cache folder created that will grow over time.  That's what the new library doesn't include and, in part, is the reason for the size discrepance.
    iPhoto 8.1.2 is only marginally compatilbe with Mavericks and, as Linc suggested, should be upgraded to iPhoto 9.5.1 to be completely compatible. 
    OT

  • IPhoto library size and movie imports - getting HUGE!

    In iPhoto 08- (in my primary library) I have 23,000 photos, and about 300 movies (some MPEG) from an older Sony digicam, and now I have a Canon Powershot TX1 which is a flash based still digicam/720P HD camcorder that captures very large AVI's (depending on shot length, they range from 30MB to 400-500MB). I know I can choose on import to not bring them into iPhoto, and just bring in the still shots. However, it does make it easy to bring them into iPhoto along with the still pics, but I am concerned about the growing size of my 45GB library (1 of 3 libraries - I have not been splitting them up in the last couple of years, relying on the fact that iPhoto is stable with very large libraries- and going to enable a Time Capsule w/ Time Machine very soon). Time Capsule would save me here, right? Am I playing with fire here on the library size, and setting myself up for a crash?? There are so many downsides to multiple libraries when it comes to projects, searches, imports, etc. I'd love to know that I can safely stick with one.
    Wondering also if I should NOT import the movies into iPhoto, and keep them seperate? The benefit to doing this, is that we can post MULTIPLE movies to the .Mac gallery at the same time, and have them appear as seperate movies...whereas in iMovie 08, if I put a bunch of clips into a project to post to .Mac gallery, it compiles them as a single movie - which is, many times, not what we want.
    Any advice here is greatly appreciated!!!

    GaryFL1:
    You might consider creating a separate library for the movies and see if that will speed up your primary library. If you needed a movie in an album to create a web gallery you could put it in an album in the Movie Library and copy that album to your working library.
    A lot of iPhoto's quickness depends on both CPU power, RAM and free space on your boot drive. I would imagine your iMac would be your primary iPhoto machine and it should meet the CPU and memory criteria. How about your free space?
    Time Machine is a very good backup device in my experience. Depending on how big your backup drive is and how much you're backing up, you can go back in time a fair amount. I've got a 750 GB TM drive backing up my boot drive and one external. It now goes back 5 1/2 weeks for me.
    TIP: For insurance against the iPhoto database corruption that many users have experienced I recommend making a backup copy of the Library6.iPhoto (iPhoto.Library for iPhoto 5 and earlier) database file and keep it current. If problems crop up where iPhoto suddenly can't see any photos or thinks there are no photos in the library, replacing the working Library6.iPhoto file with the backup will often get the library back. By keeping it current I mean backup after each import and/or any serious editing or work on books, slideshows, calendars, cards, etc. That insures that if a problem pops up and you do need to replace the database file, you'll retain all those efforts. It doesn't take long to make the backup and it's good insurance.
    I've created an Automator workflow application (requires Tiger or later), iPhoto dB File Backup, that will copy the selected Library6.iPhoto file from your iPhoto Library folder to the Pictures folder, replacing any previous version of it. It's compatible with iPhoto 6 and 7 libraries and Tiger and Leopard. iPhoto does not have to be closed to run the application, just idle. You can download it at Toad's Cellar. Be sure to read the Read Me pdf file.≤br>
    Note: There now an Automator backup application for iPhoto 5 that will work with Tiger or Leopard.

  • Discrepancy between iTunes Library size and stored folder size

    Hi
    I'm looking around for ways to clear up my computer's hard drive, and typically it seems that my iLife libraries seem to be the bulk of it. The main problem is that iTunes claims that my iTunes Library size is some 21GB, when the size of the "iTunes Library" folder claims all the music accounts to 26GB. This doesn't include any content in the 'TV Shows' or 'Movies' folders.
    The only thing I can think of is that not all of the music in my iTunes Music folder is in my iTunes Library... is there a simple way to check which ones aren't? Or is there another reason why there would be such a difference in the sizes?
    Thanks in advance.

    It may take some creative thinking rather than expertise to figure this one out.
    Oh, and my girlfriend got herself a standard MacBook a month ago, which has possibly sown the seeds of envy since it has as much RAM and a faster processor than my PowerBook MacBook Pro-wise, let's see what MacWorld in 2 weeks brings
    Then, it may be time to talk to the bank - or the finance people at Apple - about how best I can pretend I can afford one

  • Report Painter - Hide library and report instead of deleting

    Good Afternoon Everyone,
    My finance users are pressuring me to clean up the navigation in the GRR3 report painter transaction.  Many of the libraries that are displayed are standard SAP libraries and I'm hesitant to begin deleting standard SAP libraries, reports, and report groups since you can't get those back once deleted.  Is there a possibility to hide libraries/reports that are not being used any longer?  I'm on my own and would like your input about what the best practice is when faced with this scenario.  Thanks in advance for the help.
    Jordan
    Edited by: Jordan Simons on Apr 4, 2011 9:06 PM

    Hi,
    I don't know if its possible to suppress/hide libraries/reports.
    Create T-codes for the reports the users really need and add the reports to the corresponding area menu in SAP. Thus users don't have a need to use GRR3 anymore, remove the T-code from the authorization concept.
    best regards, Christian

  • Setting the page size of a report to 5.5height and 8.5 width(size-inches)

    Hi,
    I want to set the report's page size on a dot matrix printer(for PAYSLIP) to 5.5 inches height * 8.5 inches width. But i'm not able to define my own size through the printer(custom size or user defined size). Some how i cannot see the custom size in the printer settings. Is there any way where i can define the size for the report. The report output is genrated to a pdf format. Will the settings remain same once generated to pdf format. Please let me know if there's any solution for this. Its very urgent.
    Thanx.
    Anu.

    Someone plaese reply to this.

  • Mailbox and Submailbox Issue

    We have various mailboxes set up for our customers. Our typesetter moved a client's mailbox into another client's mailbox. The created a sub-mailbox. So I've tried the obvious of moving the Sub out, creating a new mailbox and moving the messages to it, and going into the Users/Username/Library/Mail/Mailboxes folder to move it there.
    Nothing worked even copy and paste into the new mailbox didn't work. Does anyone have any good ideas? I've searched through the forum, but didn't see anything off hand. Thanks!

    Please, don’t paraphrase. Report accurately what you’re doing and any error messages you get.

  • Exchange 2013 Mailbox Size Limits

    Are there any hard limits on mailbox sizes in Exchange 2013 (either in terms of mailbox size or item count)?
    Note: I am aware of the public folder mailbox size limits as well as the hard limit of 2TB for mailbox databases.

    I believe the max mailbox size is 100 GB
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/ashwinexchange/archive/2012/12/17/3541150.aspx
    Major changes in Information Store
    Managed Store
    Newly rewritten Information Store processes, Microsoft.Exchange.Store.Service.exe and Microsoft.Exchange.Store.Worker.exe.
    Each database runs under its own process, allowing for isolation of store issues to a single database.
    Tightly integrated with MSExchangeRepl.exe to provide higher availability through improved resiliency.
    Public Folder Database no longer exist.
    Exchange 2013 it supports up to 100 GB of Mailbox size, with OL2013 OST file size can be controlled.
    Exchange 2013 Enterprise Edition can only mount 50 databases on a mailbox server

  • Report file size limitation when printing?

    Does anyone know of a file size limitation when printing a .NET run Crystal report? We run a browser app, which opens a new browser when a report is printed. That works fine. When we PRINT, the ActiveX print dialog box appears. If the report is large (> 40 pages or so) it crashes our entire application. It works ok if we export to PDF then print, but I am trying to get to the bottom of why it is crashing.

    Hello,
    What version of Cr and .NET?
    Does your printer have limited memory?
    Is it local printer?
    Have you tried installing the latest Drivers for it?
    What Browser are you using and have you tried any other?
    40 pages not much local memory so it shouldn't be a problem.
    Create a new Printer and select File rather than port or LPT as the destination to see if it's a physical printer or network issue.
    Try a different printer altogether also.
    Also refer to Rule of Engagement posting before submitting your question so you provide as much info first.
    Thank you
    Don

  • Web design reporter and Report designer is not working in SAP BI

    Hello,
    I am facing JAVA RFC error in Web reporting designing and reporting designer tools in BEx application. For more details please check the attachment in mail  Any one help me for this issue.
    Please check the my system details in the following
    SAP ECC 6.0 EHP 6 with ABAP stack
    SAP BI 740 with ABAP stack
    BO 4.1
    Thanks & regards,
    Surendra

    Hi,
    Check with basis team , either they have configured rfc connection properly or not.
    Refer below also:
    http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/b0a5216a-349c-2a10-9baf-9d4797349f6a?QuickLink=index&…
    Thanks.

Maybe you are looking for