Mails forward to the bitbucket channel

Dear all,
One of our customer complains that a mail sent to him (mail2.mydom)from another user (mail1)in the same domain has not
recieved to his mailbox. The store log entires were as below. There is a SMTP relay in front of the store and the logs at this server is also shown below.
Any advice on trouble shooting what happens in this mail delivery ( through the bitbucket channel )is greatly appreciated.
smtp ( 192.168.6.210 )
====
20-Dec-2010 07:07:58.92 tcp_auth tcp_intranet EEA 4094 [email protected] rfc822;[email protected] @store.domain.com:[email protected] MAIL1 ([unknown] [123.45.67.89])
20-Dec-2010 07:08:00.48 tcp_intranet DEQC 4094 [email protected] rfc822;[email protected] @store.domain.com:[email protected] store.domain.com dns;store.domain.com (TCP|192.168.6.210|64313|192.168.6.212|25) smtp;250 2.1.5 [email protected] and options OK.
store ( 192.168.4.145 )
====
20-Dec-2010 07:12:16.61 tcp_intranet bitbucket EEC 4094 [email protected] rfc822;[email protected] mail2.mydom%example.com@ims-ms-daemon smtp1.domain.com ([unknown] [192.168.6.210])
20-Dec-2010 07:12:16.61 bitbucket DEC 4094 [email protected] rfc822;[email protected] mail2.mydom%example.com@ims-ms-daemon smtp1.domain.com ([unknown] [192.168.6.210])
Note : 192.168.6.212 is a load balancer
Thanks,
Best Regards.

Q1. Can't this delevery error I posted has any connection with vacation autoreply configured?
It is not an "error", but yes, it could be related to autoreply. If you set these options in option.dat:
log_connection=3  (or make sure bit value 2 is set if log_connection is already specified)
log_process=1
log_message_id=1and do imsimta cnbuild; and imsimta restart; you should be able to trace the messages thru the log and see if this is perhaps a copy of a message related to autoreply.
Q2. When vacation auto reply is configured for a user, it just send a autoreply to the sender's mail address.  Then what is the real requirement of specifying a different address destined for the bitbucket channel?
The requirement is to prevent that copy from becoming a real message that would be delivered somewhere. The original message has been enqueued as normal. This "copy" is discarded, by sending it to the bitbucket channel, after the autoreply has been generated.
Q3. When a msg is directed to the bitbucket channel and when the msg is dequed ( DEC ) from this channel, does it mean the msg is discarded immediately?  Is'nt there any copy kept in the disk for a default grace period?
Yes, it is discarded immediately. Actually, it is never written to disk. No, there is no way to keep a copy of it. In fact, once you enable LOG_PROCESS you can see that the dequeue from bitbucket channel is actually performed by the process which enqueued it there. The bitbucket channel is a special channel used to discard the message. It does so in the most efficient manner possible.
Q4. What is the meaning of the modifier "Q" ( which is not defined in the modifier list ) in the above log.
http://wikis.sun.com/display/CommSuite/Managing+Logging#ManagingLogging-ManagingMTAMessageandConnectionLogs
"SMTP PIPELINING extension used (RFC 2920)"
Why a mail server decided to use "chunking" ( Modifier "C" )
Because the remote SMTP server advertised support of that option.

Similar Messages

  • SMTP mail forwarding

    Hi ,
    In one of my customers IMS system we have a web mail server with http.smtphost settings which forwards the http/smtp traffic to one of
    virus wall server for filtering. After reading the forum thred below I am also thinking of avoiding the http.smtphost method and using some other way of
    http/smtp mail forwarding. Bcos this syetm carry huge http based traffic in that ISP.
    web mail behaviour for unknown recipient
    I can enable imta on the same web mail host and remove http.smtphost setting so that web mail server can
    use its defualt for http/smtp delivery. But my problem is how can I forward "all" the channels traffic to the virus wall ( not only tcp_local)?
    msg server version --> 7u3
    Thanks and best regards,
    ...

    Adding the daemon option to the tcp_local channel, as Ray suggested, will route all mail enqueued to the tcp_local channel to the specified host. However, if you want to route all mail thru that host, rather than just that which would normally go thru the tcp_local channel (ie, mail submitted by webmail users and destined for other users on the same system, it will be more complicated. If that other mail all goes thru the tcp_intranet channel, you could add the daemon option to the tcp_intranet channel as well and that would be the end of it. But if this is a single-host deployment where mshttpd is running on the same system as the message store, then such local delivery would probably go directly to the ims-ms channel.
    See the aliasdetourhost option in Routing After Address Validation But Before Expansion in the Admin Guide:
    http://wikis.sun.com/display/CommSuite/Configuring+Channel+Definitions#ConfiguringChannelDefinitions-RoutingAfterAddressValidationButBeforeExpansion
    It is also mentioned in
    http://wikis.sun.com/display/CommSuite/Messaging+Server+Best+Practices+for+Fighting+Email+Spam

  • How to set up domain mail forwarding

    Greeting gurus.
    I am a BT Business Broadband custome and BT also host my domain.
    I am terminating my Boradband service next week but the domain is not for renewal until 2012.
    I have trying to find how to set  up mail forwarding for the domain.
    I would like all mail addressed to [email protected] -> [email protected]
    Replies can then be sent from the appropriate domain.
    The reason is that mydomain.com is effectively being mothballed, but I wish to ensure that any mail does not just get lost.
    I am on the support line but wanted to know if anyone can help me quicker.
    thanks.
    ps: this is my first post so be gentle with me!

    The business forums would be a better place for this.
    http://business.forums.bt.com/
    I've not hosted a domain with BT, but all the other domain registration/hosting companies I've used have a browser based control panel where these things are configured.
    You say the domain is being mothballed. You'll have to continue with the registration though, and BT claim to offer email with all domain registrations, so why not just carry on as you are ?

  • How do I make the autoreply channel respond to local domain users?

    I'm running iMS5.1 on Solaris 8. This machine is only used as a mail store (called mailhost). The SMTP (sendmail) server handles aliases and mail lists. The autoreply channel identifies the "respond to" user's e-mail address as NOT local, DEBUG=3 in the options file. The address to respond to is [email protected] Yet, the message never gets sent, the following message is in the trace file:
    WARNING: Add sender's address failed: One of the specified addresses does not comply to RFC 822
    I checked the auto generated aliases by dumping the IMTA_ALIAS_DATABASE. They are of the form: [email protected]
    When the mail message comes from outside our subdomain, autoreply works fine. The message gets sent to our SMTP server. Here are the relevant lines from the imta.cnf:
    ! Rules to select local users
    mailhost.mysub.ourdomain.com \ $U%$[email protected]
    mysub.ourdomain.com $U%$[email protected]
    <snip> lots of stuff
    ! autoreply
    autoreply defragment subdirs 20
    autoreply-daemon
    I tried changing the rewrite rules from $U%$D to simply $U and that fixed it, but it broke the "reply to" for incoming messages. Any insights from anybody?
    Thanks,
    RS

    I'm running iMS5.1 on Solaris 8. This machine is only used as a mail store (called mailhost). The SMTP (sendmail) server handles aliases and mail lists. The autoreply channel identifies the "respond to" user's e-mail address as NOT local, DEBUG=3 in the options file. The address to respond to is [email protected]. Yet, the message never gets sent, the following message is in the trace file:
    WARNING: Add sender's address failed: One of the specified addresses does not comply to RFC 822
    I checked the auto generated aliases by dumping the IMTA_ALIAS_DATABASE. They are of the form: [email protected].
    When the mail message comes from outside our subdomain, autoreply works fine. The message gets sent to our SMTP server. Here are the relevant lines from the imta.cnf:
    ! Rules to select local users
    mailhost.mysub.ourdomain.com \ $U%[email protected]
    mysub.ourdomain.com $U%[email protected]
    <snip> lots of stuff
    ! autoreply
    autoreply defragment subdirs 20
    autoreply-daemon
    I tried changing the rewrite rules from $U%$D to simply $U and that fixed it, but it broke the "reply to" for incoming messages. Any insights from anybody?
    Thanks,
    RS

  • Rewrite rules: how to forward all mails to the specific channel?

    I have written an anti-virus plugin using the MTA SDK. Now I want to forward all the incoming messages to the channel, which is 'guarded' by my program (so my program is the channel's master).
    I've added following to the end of imta.cnf, according to MTA SDK example:
    ! kav
    x-kav master_debug logging
    x-kav-daemon
    And at the beginning of imta.cnf:
    avp.ru $U%avp.ru@x-kav-daemon$Nx-kav
    avp.ru $[email protected]
    In this configuration, any incoming mail just miss my channel completely.
    I changed it to this one:
    $* $U%avp.ru@x-kav-daemon$Nx-kav
    <2nd line removed>
    in this case, mail is sent to our channel, but has host part '$*', and the message is failed to enqueue.
    Also, it seems like this reqrite entry conflicts with ours:
    ! Rules to select local users
    $* $A$E$F$U%$H$V$[email protected]
    ultra5.avp.ru $U%$[email protected]
    avp.ru $U%$[email protected]
    As I understand, according to these rules, everything goes to @avp.ru or @ultra5.avp.ru goes to the local delivery channel ultra5.avp.ru. This is not what I want.
    So, the questions are:
    1. How to move all the messages (or just messages. which matched the specific domain) into my channel?
    2. How to configure rewrite rules, so the message can leave the channel after processing, and continue the routing?

    Still doesn't work.
    We've downloaded and installed patch 116568-52, and configured the channels:
    tcp_local aliasdetourhost tcp_scan smtp mx single_sys remotehost inner switchchannel identnonenumeric subdirs 20 maxjobs 7 pool SMTP_POOL maytlsserver maysaslserver saslswitchchannel tcp_auth missingrecipientpolicy 0
    tcp-daemon
    ! tcp_intranet
    tcp_intranet aliasdetourhost tcp_scan smtp mx single_sys subdirs 20 dequeue_removeroute maxjobs 7 pool SMTP_POOL maytlsserver allowswitchchannel saslswitchchannel tcp_auth missingrecipientpolicy 4 tcp_intranet-daemon
    tcp_scan smtp mx single_sys subdirs 20 noreverse maxjobs 7 pool SMTP_POOL dequeue_removeroute
    tcp_scan
    After sending the message, it silently goes to tcp_scan channel, and handled by channel master program. After that the message stays in tcp_scan queue forever, with HELD extension.
    Our channel master enqueues the processed message into the channel where it dequeues it, so the message seems to be looped. Here is the message:
    t;1093881341
    p;3
    *;4
    u;mailsrv
    c;tcp_scan
    s;tcp_scan.ultra5.avp.ru
    n;f
    h;<[email protected]>
    m;[email protected]
    d;20
    j;rfc822
    f;[email protected]
    @tcp_scan:[email protected]
    ..Boundary_(ID_+ko348xG8vRKcadifuDhJg)
    Received: from tcp_scan.ultra5.avp.ru by ultra5.avp.ru
    (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.01 (built Jun 24 2004))
    id <[email protected]> for [email protected] (ORCPT [email protected]
    30 Aug 2004 19:55:41 +0400 (MSD)
    Received: from tcp_scan.ultra5.avp.ru by ultra5.avp.ru
    (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.01 (built Jun 24 2004))
    id <[email protected]> for [email protected] (ORCPT [email protected]
    30 Aug 2004 19:55:41 +0400 (MSD)
    Received: from tcp_scan.ultra5.avp.ru by ultra5.avp.ru
    (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.01 (built Jun 24 2004))
    id <[email protected]> for [email protected] (ORCPT [email protected]
    30 Aug 2004 19:55:41 +0400 (MSD)
    Received: from tcp_scan.ultra5.avp.ru by ultra5.avp.ru
    (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.01 (built Jun 24 2004))
    id <[email protected]> for [email protected] (ORCPT [email protected]
    30 Aug 2004 19:55:41 +0400 (MSD)
    Received: from tcp_scan.ultra5.avp.ru by ultra5.avp.ru
    (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.01 (built Jun 24 2004))
    id <[email protected]> for [email protected] (ORCPT [email protected]
    30 Aug 2004 19:55:40 +0400 (MSD)
    Received: from tcp_scan.ultra5.avp.ru by ultra5.avp.ru
    (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.01 (built Jun 24 2004))
    id <[email protected]> for [email protected] (ORCPT [email protected]
    30 Aug 2004 19:55:40 +0400 (MSD)
    Received: from tcp_scan.ultra5.avp.ru by ultra5.avp.ru
    (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.01 (built Jun 24 2004))
    id <[email protected]> for [email protected] (ORCPT [email protected]
    30 Aug 2004 19:55:40 +0400 (MSD)
    Received: from tcp_scan.ultra5.avp.ru by ultra5.avp.ru
    (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.01 (built Jun 24 2004))
    id <[email protected]> for [email protected] (ORCPT [email protected]
    30 Aug 2004 19:55:40 +0400 (MSD)
    Received: from tcp_scan.ultra5.avp.ru by ultra5.avp.ru
    (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.01 (built Jun 24 2004))
    id <[email protected]> for [email protected] (ORCPT [email protected]
    30 Aug 2004 19:55:40 +0400 (MSD)
    Received: from tcp_scan.ultra5.avp.ru by ultra5.avp.ru
    (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.01 (built Jun 24 2004))
    id <[email protected]> for [email protected] (ORCPT [email protected]
    30 Aug 2004 19:55:40 +0400 (MSD)
    Received: from tcp_scan.ultra5.avp.ru by ultra5.avp.ru
    (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.01 (built Jun 24 2004))
    id <[email protected]> for [email protected] (ORCPT [email protected]
    30 Aug 2004 19:55:40 +0400 (MSD)
    Received: from localhost.localdomain ([172.16.0.35])
    by ultra5.avp.ru (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.01 (bu
    24 2004)) with ESMTP id <[email protected]> for test@avp.
    (ORCPT [email protected]); Mon, 30 Aug 2004 19:55:39 +0400 (MSD)
    Content-return: allowed
    Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 19:55:39 +0400 (MSD)
    Date-warning: Date header was inserted by ultra5.avp.ru
    From: [email protected]
    Subject: sent on Mon Aug 30 19:58:29 2004
    To: Undisclosed recipients: ;
    Message-id: <[email protected]>
    ..Boundary_(ID_+ko348xG8vRKcadifuDhJg)
    How to avoid this loop? Should our master enqueue the processed messages into another channel? If yes, what channel should we enqueue to? If no, how to avoid this loop?

  • I want to forward a message with the default headers included, but can't seem to set my mail preferences to include the headers when forwarding, just the original message ends up in the forwarded message and not the headers?

    I want to forward a message with the default headers included, but can’t seem to set my mail preferences to include the headers when forwarding, just the original message ends up in the forwarded message and not the headers?  What I'm trying to do is report SPAM and add headers to a spam message to forward to sites that go after the spammers.

    Did you check the article and the add-on mentioned there?

  • I receive and e-mail with attachments but when I forward them, the attachments are smaller. how to fix this?

    I receive e-mails with attachments, but when I forward them the attachments are reduced in size.  What do I need to do to have them forwarded the same size as I received them?

    If the attachments are photos, when you forward them, look on the bottom right of your compose window, change to "actual size".  It's probably set to small as displayed here:
    Regards,
    Captfred

  • TS3276 Apple Mail cannot find replies or forwarded emails -- the little arrows on the left of the list of emails: "Mail was unable to find your reply to the message '[subject of message]'. You may have deleted the message."  I did not delete the message.

    Apple Mail cannot find replies or forwarded emails -- the little arrows on the left of the list of emails: "Mail was unable to find your reply to the message '[subject of message]'. You may have deleted the message."  I did not delete the message.  Bug in the program, or am I missing something?

    Of course they're in my Sent folder.  Then why can't Apple Mail find them?

  • When will the ip channel fast forward /rewind get ...

    I was hoping that this long awaited update would Fox the fast forward and rewind of Internet channels to function the same as normal channels but no such luck.
    This is so annoying it fast forwards a full minute but then rewinds in like 15 seconds intervals.
    Is this being worked on?
    On a happier note I love that the record light comes on when the box is in standby now.

    The info we got was that this won't change as the coding the ip channels use can't be decoded fast enough for visible ff and rew, so I wouldn't hold out too much hope for this ever changing. I actually find going forward in 1 minute chunks works better than the visual ff as I always miss the start and have to rew again and for large jumps just stop the play and move fast up the timeline or input the exact minutes

  • Deleting AD users vs Disabling. What is the difference? If an account is disabled, can it still be setup for mail forwarding to another user? If an account is deleted, what files get deleted?

    Deleting AD users vs Disabling.  What is the difference?  If an account is disabled, can it still be setup for mail forwarding to another user? If an account is deleted, what files get deleted?  Thanks.

    Hi,
    Disable Users: Nobody can log in to the mailbox, but the data is safe and it can receive email. Once it is enabled, it is back to normal.
    Delete Users: when the user is deleted all the services are removed and all data is erased. The user is deleted from our Active Directory. If you create a user with the same Name and Emial address again, no data or services are recovered.
    If you disable a user, the Active Directory object remains untouched together with the mailbox data and properties, but you will not be able to access any mailbox data.
    If you delete a user, the Active Directory object is removed together with all data and properties of the user.
    Hope it helps.
    Regards,
    Blair Deng
    Blair Deng
    TechNet Community Support

  • Restrict E-mail sender in the Mail sender communication channel.

    Hi All,
            My scenerio customers want to Email with attachment to PI server. I've successfull tested this scenerio without one open issue. Right now anyone having email id can send mail to PI server.
    I want to restrict the senders list. Is this possible in the sender Mail adapter configuration.
    Thanks,

    Hi,
    Its possible.
    You need to configure 2 receiver
    1)MailA
    2)MAILB
    in receiver determination.
    then you need to route it based on Subject using condition in receiver determination.
    Use the below XSD to create your sender mail message type
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
    <!--
    SAP takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any intellectual property or
    other rights that might be claimed to pertain to the implementation or use of the
    technology described in this document or the extent to which any license under such
    rights might or might not be available; neither does it represent that it has made any
    effort to identify any such rights.
    Copyright © SAP 2003-2004. All Rights Reserved.
    This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to others, and derivative
    works that comment on or otherwise explain it or assist in its implementation may be
    prepared, copied, published and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of
    any kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are included on all
    such copies and derivative works. However, this document itself does not be modified in
    any way, such as by removing the copyright notice or references to SAP.
    This document and the information contained herein is provided on an u201CAS ISu201D
    basis and SAP DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO
    ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY
    IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
    -->
    <xs:schema targetNamespace="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Mail/30"
      xmlns:xi="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Mail/30"
      xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">
    <!--
      * Mail
      -->
      <xs:element name="Mail">
        <xs:annotation>
          <xs:documentation>Mail package for XI - Mail Adapter</xs:documentation>
        </xs:annotation>
        <xs:complexType>
          <xs:sequence>
            <xs:element name="Subject" type="xs:string" minOccurs="0"></xs:element>
            <xs:element name="From" type="xs:string" minOccurs="0"></xs:element>
            <xs:element name="To" type="xs:string" minOccurs="0"></xs:element>
            <xs:element name="Reply_To" type="xs:string" minOccurs="0"></xs:element>
            <xs:element name="Content_Type" type="xs:string" minOccurs="0"></xs:element>
            <xs:element name="Date" type="xs:dateTime" minOccurs="0"></xs:element>
            <xs:element name="Message_ID" type="xs:string" minOccurs="0"></xs:element>
            <xs:element name="X_Mailer" type="xs:string" minOccurs="0"></xs:element>
            <xs:element name="Content" minOccurs="0">
              <xs:annotation>
                <xs:documentation>any type</xs:documentation>
              </xs:annotation>
            </xs:element>
          </xs:sequence>
          <xs:attribute name="encoding" type="xs:string"></xs:attribute>
        </xs:complexType>
      </xs:element>
      <xs:element name="MailReceipt">
        <xs:annotation>
          <xs:documentation>Mail Receipt for XI - Mail Adaper</xs:documentation>
        </xs:annotation>
        <xs:complexType>
          <xs:sequence>
            <xs:element name="Server" type="xs:string"></xs:element>
            <xs:element name="Format" type="xs:string"></xs:element>
            <xs:element name="UseMailPackage" type="xs:boolean"></xs:element>
            <xs:element name="Encoding" type="xs:string"></xs:element>
            <xs:element name="Subject" type="xs:string" minOccurs="0"></xs:element>
            <xs:element name="From" type="xs:dateTime" minOccurs="0"></xs:element>
            <xs:element name="To" type="xs:string" minOccurs="0"></xs:element>
            <xs:element name="Date" type="xs:dateTime" minOccurs="0"></xs:element>
          </xs:sequence>
        </xs:complexType>
      </xs:element>
    </xs:schema>
    and use mail package in sender mail adapter.
    Then your mail will come in XI in the above format.
    then based on subject field you can conditionaly determine the receiver.
    Message Protocol
    u25CF      XIALL
    In this mode, the content of the RF C822 e-mail matches the content of the XI message. The XI message is a multipart MIME message with a SOAP envelope as its first part. See also: Messages, under XI Message Protocol.
    u25CF      XIPAYLOAD
    In this mode, the content of the e-mail is put in the payload of the XI message. If you do not set the Use Mail Package indicator, the information about the sender (From), receiver (To), and subject of the e-mail is lost.
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/23/c093409c663228e10000000a1550b0/content.htm

  • HELP! Mail stuck in the queue.

    Hey All,
    We just noticed that none of us here recieved any mail today and that all of our messages incoming/outgoing have been stuck in the queue all day.
    We seem to be able to view old messages with our mail clients as well as any folders. But any new messages that we send or recieve just go to the server and sit there.
    It's quite puzzeling because we haven't changed anything on it, the server has just been quietly humming along for a while now.
    However, this seems to have started happening after we restarted the box this morning because a web app we were building on it ended up in an infinite loop.
    I tried re-starting the box, restarting the mail service, resending the queue and nothing, messages hit the queue and fail to be delivered to mailboxes.
    Looking at my logs I saw this:
    Nov 9 16:56:28 resserver imap[4733]: DBERROR: critical database situation
    Nov 9 17:00:07 resserver imap[4833]: DBERROR: critical database situation
    Nov 9 17:15:56 resserver reconstruct[5700]: DBERROR: critical database situation
    Nov 9 17:16:02 resserver reconstruct[5726]: DBERROR: critical database situation
    In the queue some messages say this at the end:
    host 127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1] said: 421 4.3.2 Service shutting down, closing channel (in reply to end of DATA command
    Looking in my resources and in other places on the forums I've tried the following so far in hopes to narrow down and fix the problem:
    - rebuilt with mailbfr (as per petrobytes suggestion with someone else)
    - turned on and off content filtering
    - confirmed that the machine has the same IP
    - confirmed that it resolves forward and backward to it's hostname/IP
    I can post any conf files you need, I'm desperate to get this fixed! Any help or insight anyone could provide would be well appreciated!
    eMac, iBook, iMac, xServe, PowerBook   Mac OS X (10.4.3)  

    I'm noticing some interesting stuff happening in the logs can someone make sense of this?
    solutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[7872]: (07872-01) Requesting process rundown after fatal error
    Nov 9 18:47:15 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[7872]: (07872-01) SMTP shutdown: Error writing a SMTP response to the socket: Bad file descriptor at (eval 36) line 760.\n
    Nov 9 18:47:15 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[7873]: (07873-01) TROUBLE in check_mail: mime_decode-1 FAILED: parsing file(1) results - missing last 2 results at (eval 41) line 150.
    Nov 9 18:47:15 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[7873]: (07873-01) PRESERVING EVIDENCE in /var/amavis/amavis-20061109T184715-07873
    Nov 9 18:47:15 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[7873]: (07873-01) TIMING [total 350 ms] - SMTP EHLO: 23 (7%), SMTP pre-MAIL: 2 (1%), mkdir tempdir: 1 (0%), create email.txt: 2 (0%), SMTP pre-DATA-flush: 9 (3%), SMTP DATA: 9 (3%), body_hash: 3 (1%), mkdir parts: 3 (1%), mime_decode: 72 (21%), rundown: 226 (65%)
    Nov 9 18:47:15 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[7873]: (07873-01) TROUBLE in process_request: Error writing a SMTP response to the socket: Broken pipe at (eval 36) line 760, <GEN4> line 568.
    Nov 9 18:47:15 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[7873]: (07873-01) Requesting process rundown after fatal error
    Nov 9 18:47:15 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[7873]: (07873-01) SMTP shutdown: Error writing a SMTP response to the socket: Bad file descriptor at (eval 36) line 760.\n
    Nov 9 18:47:15 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[7876]: (07876-01) ESMTP::10024 /var/amavis/amavis-20061109T184715-07876: <[email protected]> -> <[email protected]> Received: SIZE=50687 from resolutionim.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (resserver.resolutionim.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 07876-01 for <[email protected]>; Thu, 9 Nov 2006 18:47:15 -0500 (EST)
    Nov 9 18:47:15 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[7876]: (07876-01) Checking: [216.46.146.115] <[email protected]> -> <[email protected]>
    Nov 9 18:47:15 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[7876]: (07876-01) p004 1 Content-Type: multipart/mixed
    Nov 9 18:47:15 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[7876]: (07876-01) p005 1/1 Content-Type: multipart/alternative
    Nov 9 18:47:15 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[7876]: (07876-01) p001 1/1/1 Content-Type: text/plain, size: 259 B, name:
    Nov 9 18:47:15 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[7876]: (07876-01) p002 1/1/2 Content-Type: text/html, size: 2227 B, name:
    Nov 9 18:47:15 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[7876]: (07876-01) p003 1/2 Content-Type: application/vnd.ms-excel, size: 33280 B, name: Emploment Application.xls
    Nov 9 18:47:15 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[7879]: (07876-01) run_command: child process [7879]: Can't close main::stdin: Bad file descriptor at /usr/bin/amavisd line 1589.\n
    Nov 9 18:47:15 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[7879]: (07876-01) SMTP shutdown: tempdir is being removed: /var/amavis/amavis-20061109T184715-07876
    Nov 9 18:47:15 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[7876]: (07876-01) TROUBLE in check_mail: mime_decode-1 FAILED: parsing file(1) results - missing last 3 results at (eval 41) line 150.
    Nov 9 18:47:15 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[7876]: (07876-01) PRESERVING EVIDENCE in /var/amavis/amavis-20061109T184715-07876
    Nov 9 18:47:16 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[7876]: (07876-01) TIMING [total 366 ms] - SMTP EHLO: 24 (7%), SMTP pre-MAIL: 3 (1%), mkdir tempdir: 2 (0%), create email.txt: 2 (1%), SMTP pre-DATA-flush: 25 (7%), SMTP DATA: 31 (8%), body_hash: 3 (1%), mkdir parts: 3 (1%), mime_decode: 95 (26%), rundown: 178 (49%)
    Nov 9 18:47:16 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[7876]: (07876-01) TROUBLE in process_request: Error writing a SMTP response to the socket: Broken pipe at (eval 36) line 760, <GEN4> line 771.
    Nov 9 18:47:16 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[7876]: (07876-01) Requesting process rundown after fatal error
    Nov 9 18:47:16 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[7876]: (07876-01) SMTP shutdown: Error writing a SMTP response to the socket: Bad file descriptor at (eval 36) line 760.\n
    Nov 9 18:48:33 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[7759]: Net::Server: 2006/11/09-18:48:33 Server closing!
    Nov 9 18:48:36 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[7927]: starting. /usr/bin/amavisd at resserver.resolutionim.com amavisd-new-2.2.0 (20041102), Unicode aware
    Nov 9 18:48:36 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[7927]: user=, EUID: 0 (0); group=, EGID: 0 0 (0 0)
    Nov 9 18:48:36 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[7927]: Perl version 5.008006
    Nov 9 18:48:36 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[7927]: Net::Server: 2006/11/09-18:48:36 Amavis (type Net::Server::PreForkSimple) starting! pid(7927)
    Nov 9 18:48:36 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[7927]: Net::Server: Binding to UNIX socket file /var/amavis/amavisd.sock using SOCK_STREAM
    Nov 9 18:48:36 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[7927]: Net::Server: Binding to TCP port 10024 on host 127.0.0.1
    Nov 9 18:48:36 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[7927]: Net::Server: Setting gid to "82 82"
    Nov 9 18:48:36 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[7927]: Net::Server: Setting uid to "82"
    Nov 9 18:48:36 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[7927]: Module Amavis::Conf 2.033
    Nov 9 18:48:36 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[7927]: Module Archive::Tar 1.22
    Nov 9 18:48:36 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[7927]: Module Archive::Zip 1.14
    Nov 9 18:48:36 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[7927]: Module Compress::Zlib 1.33
    Nov 9 18:48:36 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[7927]: Module Convert::TNEF 0.17
    Nov 9 18:48:36 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[7927]: Module Convert::UUlib 1.03
    Nov 9 18:48:36 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[7927]: Module DB_File 1.810
    Nov 9 18:48:36 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[7927]: Module MIME::Entity 5.416
    Nov 9 18:48:36 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[7927]: Module MIME::Parser 5.416
    Nov 9 18:48:36 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[7927]: Module MIME::Tools 5.416
    Nov 9 18:48:36 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[7927]: Module Mail::Header 1.65
    Nov 9 18:48:36 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[7927]: Module Mail::Internet 1.65
    Nov 9 18:48:36 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[7927]: Module Mail::SpamAssassin 3.001005
    Nov 9 18:48:36 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[7927]: Module Net::Cmd 2.26
    Nov 9 18:48:36 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[7927]: Module Net::DNS 0.58
    Nov 9 18:48:36 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[7927]: Module Net::SMTP 2.29
    Nov 9 18:48:36 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[7927]: Module Net::Server 0.94
    Nov 9 18:48:36 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[7927]: Module Time::HiRes 1.65
    Nov 9 18:48:36 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[7927]: Module Unix::Syslog 0.99
    Nov 9 18:48:36 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[7927]: Amavis::DB code NOT loaded
    Nov 9 18:48:36 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[7927]: Amavis::Cache code NOT loaded
    Nov 9 18:48:36 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[7927]: Lookup::SQL code NOT loaded
    Nov 9 18:48:36 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[7927]: Lookup::LDAP code NOT loaded
    Nov 9 18:48:36 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[7927]: AMCL-in protocol code loaded
    Nov 9 18:48:36 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[7927]: SMTP-in protocol code loaded
    Nov 9 18:48:36 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[7927]: ANTI-VIRUS code loaded
    Nov 9 18:48:36 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[7927]: ANTI-SPAM code loaded
    Nov 9 18:48:36 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[7927]: Unpackers code loaded
    Nov 9 18:48:36 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[7927]: Found $file at /usr/bin/file
    Nov 9 18:48:36 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[7927]: No $arc, not using it
    Nov 9 18:48:36 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[7927]: Found $gzip at /usr/bin/gzip
    Nov 9 18:48:36 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[7927]: Found $bzip2 at /usr/bin/bzip2
    Nov 9 18:48:36 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[7927]: No $lzop, not using it
    Nov 9 18:48:36 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[7927]: No $lha, not using it
    Nov 9 18:48:36 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[7927]: No $unarj, not using it
    Nov 9 18:48:36 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[7927]: Found $uncompress at /usr/bin/uncompress
    Nov 9 18:48:36 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[7927]: No $unfreeze, not using it
    Nov 9 18:48:36 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[7927]: No $unrar, not using it
    Nov 9 18:48:36 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[7927]: No $zoo, not using it
    Nov 9 18:48:36 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[7927]: Found $cpio at /usr/bin/cpio
    Nov 9 18:48:36 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[7927]: No $ar, not using it
    Nov 9 18:48:36 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[7927]: No $rpm2cpio, not using it
    Nov 9 18:48:36 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[7927]: No $cabextract, not using it
    Nov 9 18:48:36 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[7927]: No $dspam, not using it
    Nov 9 18:48:36 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[7927]: Found secondary av scanner Clam Antivirus - clamscan at /usr/bin/clamscan
    Nov 9 18:48:36 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[7927]: SpamControl: initializing Mail::SpamAssassin
    Nov 9 18:48:44 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[7927]: SpamControl: done
    SMTP response to the socket: Broken pipe at (eval 36) line 760, <GEN4> line 350.
    Nov 9 19:41:44 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[9584]: (09584-01) Requesting process rundown after fatal error
    Nov 9 19:41:44 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[9584]: (09584-01) SMTP shutdown: Error writing a SMTP response to the socket: Bad file descriptor at (eval 36) line 760.\n
    Nov 9 19:41:44 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[9586]: (09586-01) ESMTP::10024 /var/amavis/amavis-20061109T194144-09586: <[email protected]> -> <[email protected]>,<[email protected]> Received: SIZE=236428 from resolutionim.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (resserver.resolutionim.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 09586-01; Thu, 9 Nov 2006 19:41:44 -0500 (EST)
    Nov 9 19:41:44 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[9586]: (09586-01) Checking: [192.168.1.121] <[email protected]> -> <[email protected]>,<[email protected]>
    Nov 9 19:41:44 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[9587]: (09587-01) ESMTP::10024 /var/amavis/amavis-20061109T194144-09587: <[email protected]> -> <[email protected]> Received: SIZE=2799147 from resolutionim.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (resserver.resolutionim.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 09587-01 for <[email protected]>; Thu, 9 Nov 2006 19:41:44 -0500 (EST)
    Nov 9 19:41:44 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[9586]: (09586-01) p008 1 Content-Type: multipart/alternative
    Nov 9 19:41:44 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[9586]: (09586-01) p001 1/1 Content-Type: text/plain, size: 1103 B, name:
    Nov 9 19:41:44 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[9586]: (09586-01) p009 1/2 Content-Type: multipart/mixed
    Nov 9 19:41:44 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[9586]: (09586-01) p002 1/2/1 Content-Type: text/html, size: 4971 B, name:
    Nov 9 19:41:44 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[9586]: (09586-01) p003 1/2/2 Content-Type: application/vnd.ms-excel, size: 16384 B, name: Feed Locations.xls
    Nov 9 19:41:44 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[9586]: (09586-01) p004 1/2/3 Content-Type: application/octet-stream, size: 15355 B, name: Example of Feed Locations.pdf
    Nov 9 19:41:44 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[9586]: (09586-01) p005 1/2/4 Content-Type: image/jpeg, size: 68882 B, name: zurlftoct06.JPG
    Nov 9 19:41:44 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[9586]: (09586-01) p006 1/2/5 Content-Type: image/jpeg, size: 65599 B, name: extrrtlondsoct06.JPG
    Nov 9 19:41:44 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[9586]: (09586-01) p007 1/2/6 Content-Type: text/html, size: 184 B, name:
    Nov 9 19:41:44 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[9588]: (09586-01) run_command: child process [9588]: Can't close main::stdin: Bad file descriptor at /usr/bin/amavisd line 1589.\n
    Nov 9 19:41:44 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[9588]: (09586-01) SMTP shutdown: tempdir is being removed: /var/amavis/amavis-20061109T194144-09586
    Nov 9 19:41:44 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[9586]: (09586-01) TROUBLE in check_mail: mime_decode-1 FAILED: parsing file(1) results - missing last 7 results at (eval 41) line 150.
    Nov 9 19:41:44 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[9586]: (09586-01) PRESERVING EVIDENCE in /var/amavis/amavis-20061109T194144-09586
    Nov 9 19:41:44 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[9586]: (09586-01) TIMING [total 435 ms] - SMTP EHLO: 22 (5%), SMTP pre-MAIL: 3 (1%), mkdir tempdir: 1 (0%), create email.txt: 2 (0%), SMTP pre-DATA-flush: 10 (2%), SMTP DATA: 45 (10%), body_hash: 6 (1%), mkdir parts: 3 (1%), mime_decode: 158 (36%), rundown: 185 (42%)
    Nov 9 19:41:44 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[9586]: (09586-01) TROUBLE in process_request: Error writing a SMTP response to the socket: Broken pipe at (eval 36) line 760, <GEN4> line 3144.
    Nov 9 19:41:44 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[9586]: (09586-01) Requesting process rundown after fatal error
    Nov 9 19:41:44 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[9586]: (09586-01) SMTP shutdown: Error writing a SMTP response to the socket: Bad file descriptor at (eval 36) line 760.\n
    Nov 9 19:41:44 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[9589]: (09589-01) ESMTP::10024 /var/amavis/amavis-20061109T194144-09589: <[email protected]> -> <[email protected]> Received: SIZE=2244 from resolutionim.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (resserver.resolutionim.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 09589-01 for <[email protected]>; Thu, 9 Nov 2006 19:41:44 -0500 (EST)
    Nov 9 19:41:44 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[9589]: (09589-01) Checking: [65.54.246.141] <[email protected]> -> <[email protected]>
    Nov 9 19:41:44 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[9589]: (09589-01) p001 1 Content-Type: text/plain, size: 1084 B, name:
    Nov 9 19:41:44 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[9590]: (09589-01) run_command: child process [9590]: Can't close main::stdin: Bad file descriptor at /usr/bin/amavisd line 1589.\n
    Nov 9 19:41:44 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[9590]: (09589-01) SMTP shutdown: tempdir is being removed: /var/amavis/amavis-20061109T194144-09589
    Nov 9 19:41:45 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[9589]: (09589-01) TROUBLE in check_mail: mime_decode-1 FAILED: parsing file(1) results - missing last 1 results at (eval 41) line 150.
    Nov 9 19:41:45 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[9589]: (09589-01) PRESERVING EVIDENCE in /var/amavis/amavis-20061109T194144-09589
    Nov 9 19:41:45 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[9589]: (09589-01) TIMING [total 240 ms] - SMTP EHLO: 19 (8%), SMTP pre-MAIL: 2 (1%), mkdir tempdir: 1 (1%), create email.txt: 2 (1%), SMTP pre-DATA-flush: 8 (3%), SMTP DATA: 2 (1%), body_hash: 2 (1%), mkdir parts: 3 (1%), mime_decode: 36 (15%), rundown: 165 (69%)
    Nov 9 19:41:45 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[9589]: (09589-01) TROUBLE in process_request: Error writing a SMTP response to the socket: Broken pipe at (eval 36) line 760, <GEN4> line 67.
    Nov 9 19:41:45 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[9589]: (09589-01) Requesting process rundown after fatal error
    Nov 9 19:41:45 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[9589]: (09589-01) SMTP shutdown: Error writing a SMTP response to the socket: Bad file descriptor at (eval 36) line 760.\n
    Nov 9 19:41:45 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[9591]: (09591-01) ESMTP::10024 /var/amavis/amavis-20061109T194145-09591: <[email protected]> -> <[email protected]> Received: SIZE=2799145 from resolutionim.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (resserver.resolutionim.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 09591-01 for <[email protected]>; Thu, 9 Nov 2006 19:41:45 -0500 (EST)
    Nov 9 19:41:45 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[9587]: (09587-01) Checking: [65.54.246.171] <[email protected]> -> <[email protected]>
    Nov 9 19:41:45 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[9591]: (09591-01) Checking: [65.54.246.173] <[email protected]> -> <[email protected]>
    Nov 9 19:41:45 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[9587]: (09587-01) p003 1 Content-Type: multipart/mixed
    Nov 9 19:41:45 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[9587]: (09587-01) p001 1/1 Content-Type: text/html, size: 6064 B, name:
    Nov 9 19:41:45 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[9587]: (09587-01) p002 1/2 Content-Type: video/x-ms-wmv, size: 2025860 B, name: JBSklip.wmv
    Nov 9 19:41:45 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[9592]: (09587-01) run_command: child process [9592]: Can't close main::stdin: Bad file descriptor at /usr/bin/amavisd line 1589.\n
    Nov 9 19:41:45 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[9592]: (09587-01) SMTP shutdown: tempdir is being removed: /var/amavis/amavis-20061109T194144-09587
    Nov 9 19:41:46 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[9587]: (09587-01) TROUBLE in check_mail: mime_decode-1 FAILED: parsing file(1) results - missing last 2 results at (eval 41) line 150.
    Nov 9 19:41:46 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[9587]: (09587-01) PRESERVING EVIDENCE in /var/amavis/amavis-20061109T194144-09587
    Nov 9 19:41:46 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[9587]: (09587-01) TIMING [total 1950 ms] - SMTP EHLO: 22 (1%), SMTP pre-MAIL: 4 (0%), mkdir tempdir: 1 (0%), create email.txt: 2 (0%), SMTP pre-DATA-flush: 9 (0%), SMTP DATA: 868 (44%), body_hash: 34 (2%), mkdir parts: 3 (0%), mime_decode: 610 (31%), rundown: 397 (20%)
    Nov 9 19:41:46 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[9587]: (09587-02) ESMTP::10024 /var/amavis/amavis-20061109T194146-09587: <[email protected]> -> <[email protected]> Received: SIZE=14124 from resolutionim.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (resserver.resolutionim.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 09587-02 for <[email protected]>; Thu, 9 Nov 2006 19:41:46 -0500 (EST)
    Nov 9 19:41:46 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[9587]: (09587-02) Checking: [64.233.166.181] <[email protected]> -> <[email protected]>
    Nov 9 19:41:46 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[9587]: (09587-02) p003 1 Content-Type: multipart/alternative
    Nov 9 19:41:46 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[9587]: (09587-02) p001 1/1 Content-Type: text/plain, size: 2089 B, name:
    Nov 9 19:41:46 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[9587]: (09587-02) p002 1/2 Content-Type: text/html, size: 9454 B, name:
    Nov 9 19:41:46 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[9593]: (09587-02) run_command: child process [9593]: Can't close main::stdin: Bad file descriptor at /usr/bin/amavisd line 1589.\n
    Nov 9 19:41:46 resserver.resolutionim.com /usr/bin/amavisd[9593]: (09587-02) SMTP shutdown: tempdir is being removed: /var/amavis/amavis-20061109T194146-09587

  • How can I move an e-mail forwarded as an attachment into my inbox?

    I recently migrated from MS Outlook 2003 to Thunderbird 24.4.0 for my personal e-mail because I can't afford the latest MS Outlook and wouldn't really want version 2013 anyway. Prior to the migration, any time someone sent me a personal e-mail at work, I would forward it home as an attachment and move that attachment into my inbox at home. In Thunderbird, I find that when I drag the e-mail attachment from the attachment section to the Inbox folder (the actual folder in the navigation pane or the list of e-mails in the inbox), I get the unavailable symbol (circle with slash through it). I am guessing this is not going to be something I can do in Thunderbird, but wanted to check here and see if anyone had other ways to get the same end result.
    The reason I have done this historically is to preserve the original e-mail and have the mail client show me who sent it to me. Viewing the forwarded message is fine, but if I want to look for it later, I have to look for a forwarding e-mail from myself instead of the original message that was sent to me.
    Beyond getting people to use my personal address (really not sure why/how they have my work one), does anyone have any advice that could make this happen? For the record, I also tried resending the e-mail to my personal address as if it were from the original sender, but that won't fly at work due to the security configuration in the Exchange server.

    Save the attachment, and give it an eml extension if it doesn't have one (messages attached to TB messages are named 'Attached Message'), then drag the eml file from the Explorer folder where you saved it and drop it on a TB folder in the Folder Pane.

  • Mail: Forwarding: Original Sender Gets Email as Well?

    I haven't been using Mail very long -- I used to use Eudora for decades and it was my definitely favorite email app. I hated Outlook et. al and when I bought my MacBook Pro and it was running 10.5.8, well, I just could not get Eudora to work. So I reluctantly had to switch to Mail, which I hated then, and hate even more now.
    A couple of times, I was horrified to see that when I forwarded email from someone to my wife, and perhaps added a comment with the quoted text of the email, the original sender whose email i was forwarding got the email -- with my comment -- as well!
    Since I don't know what's going on, I don't know how to explain it, but here's an example. Someone emailed me about taking some lessons (I teach Japanese). I replied and said I couldn't take her right now, which wasn't true -- she was already asking for a group discount for two people and I know the type and I just didn't want to bother with it, so I said I was too busy.
    Then, I forwarded the email she had sent me, with the request for the discount, to my wife. I specifically chose the "Forward" button, my wife's address appeared in the address box, and I included some snide comment about why the woman was asking for a discount on a discount, as I'm already way cheaper than most turors.
    Still with me?
    Then, later on I changed my mind and replied to the woman and told her I could fit her in, but she'd have to pay the full price. I BCCd my wife in on this email (Bcc means "Blind CC" -- meaning, as I understand it, that the main person recieving the email only sees their address in the header, and possibly "and other recipients," but not anyone else's email address or anything like that.
    So, we go back and forth over various things, and occasionally I forward the woman's email to my wife, again, with comments, that I OBVIOUSLY don't want this woman to see.
    Okay, no problems there -- before I click "Send" I make sure my wife's address, and ONLY her address, is in the address field, as I'm just forwarding an email.
    Yet today, when I went to check what time this person is coming, I see all the emails that we've ever exchanged including the very first one, all one after another -- her emails, my replies etc. But then, in the middle of all these, I suddenly see the email I forwarded to my wife with the snide comment in it! How the **** did it get in there, and is it possible that email was also sent to this woman as well, so she read my comment?
    Other odd things have happened when I've forwarded things to my wife -- a reply, perhaps, from someone we both know but with my previous emails, NOT MEANT to be read by my wife, somehow in the chain!
    Now I'm ultra paranoid. Has this woman received those emails I sent to my wife (I thought) and read my snide comments? Why on erth would Mail include, in this bck and forth with this woman -- maybe ten emails in all, suddenly a forwarded email to my wife? It should not be in the chain at all, since it was NOT sent to the woman, merely forwarded to my wife.
    Is Mail sending emails to people with their email addresses being visible in the address fields without my knowledge? Has this woman read my snide comments (and my wife's replies to them!) and even if not, why are those back-and-forths with my wife doing in the same chain as the emails to this woman? They technically should have no connection to the woman, since they were nit addressed to her, merely forwarded.
    And are people seeing who I'm Blind CCing? Mail certainly is an effed-up app -- it's very badly putr together and just serves to remind me that Apple has really put some horrific software into their systems over the years, and seemingly with every new iteratioon and every new OS, the apps just get worse and less intuitive, not the opposite, with NO WAY to downgrade. If I had my way, this MacBook would be running Tiger. with iMovie from 2004 (same for all the iLife apps -- they've degenerated into Microsoft-like unusable messes).
    But I'm seriously worried about this Mail issue -- the last thing I want is for people to be receiving emails that I'm not aware are being sent.
    And I REALLY wish Eudora functioned on this machine -- I don't know why it doesn't but it keeps giving me error messages. But that's a separate problem.
    Anyone else experienced anything like this?

    Thanks, guys . . .
    I kind of knew that Mail couldn't possibly be sending emails to people without my being aware of it but I just wanted to double check.
    As far as the other email programs go, for some insane reason all the ones I try (Thunderbird, for one) have problems connecting with my SMTP (outgoing) server. In one case, there's no way to change my account setting from IMAP to POP . . . the way these programs are set up, just configuring your settings requires a B.S. in network technology . . . every time these things happen, I end up on the phone with the local ISP for two hours and most of them have no idea what a Mac is  . . .
    I think in this case I wll just stick wth the Devil I Know. Every email program has its drawbacks and Mail is clunky and unintuitive but thank God, it integrates with SpamSieve, the only junk mail killer that really, really works (I just learned how WELL it works when I tried Thunderbird and it downloaded all the mail I'm REALLY getting s opposed to the mail that I end up seeing -- for every legit email that SpamSieve lets through, there are at least 75 that it doesn't. I don't know about anyone else, but I'm inundated with at LEAST 400 junk emails A DAY for my two accounts and without SpamSieve I'd be in the First Circle of ****, but I digress).
    It's been a year now with Mail and although I despise it at least now I think I'm getting used to it, and your reassurances about people getting unwanted mail definitely removed my last doubts.
    I'll stick with Mail, since the others don't look exactly like champs either, and just pray Apple doesn't "Upsdate" anything for a good long while.
    Cheers, mates
    Nick

  • How can I send just 1 message for 2 mail accounts under mail forwarding

    Hi everyone
    I have a question for mail forwarding.
    I have 2 inbound mail servers,4 outbound servers and many store servers.
    User A set his mail forwarding address to B, and B set his mail forwarding address to A.
    So 2 guys can receive each others message.
    In this case, If two users have same "mailhost' value(ex, x.test.com), forwarding mail goes just once for each accounts.
    If "mailhost' values , however, are different (ex, x.test.com and y.test.com - and also two mail servers connected as internal server),
    forwarding mail goes 4 times for each accounts.
    So sender gets 4 messages and receiver gets 5 messages.
    How can I set mail server configuration to send just once not 4 times for 2 users?
    Any advices would be welcomed.
    Thanks
    Message was edited by:
    1231dugi
    Message was edited by:
    1231dugi

    Hi,
    User A set his mail forwarding address to B, and B
    set his mail forwarding address to A.
    So 2 guys can receive each others message.You have just created a mail loop. This is not a good thing.
    Any advices would be welcomed.I would advise creating a mailing list which has both userA and userB as members, and then have emails sent to that address OR have a third account which they can both access (IMAP shared folders) and have email sent to that OR have them share each-others INBOX.
    The fact that userA & B didn't get multiple copies when they were on the same mailhost is due to good luck only.
    Shane.

Maybe you are looking for