Mapping not sufficiently defined FILE TO IDOC(HRMD_A.HRMD_A06) scenerio
Hello friends,
In message mapping part from File to IDOC. I am doing mapping of infotype 14 message type with the corresponding idoc. But when I activate it I am getting the following error:
Activation of the change list canceled Check result for Message Mapping MM_INF14_LS | urn:tcs:test: Mapping not sufficiently defined
As far as I know I have properly mapped the fields which I am picking from the file. But I am not very sure what to do woth few fields in the IDOC which appear to be red in message mapping
Kindly give me the solution.
Regards,
Lokesh
Thanx guys...I tried changing the description of other mappings whch were already activated. And thn I tried activating I got the same error:
Activation of the change list canceled Check result for Message Mapping MM_02IT | urn:tcs:payroll: Starting compilation Source code has syntax error: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: com/sun/tools/javac/Main Exception in thread "main"
what possibly can go wrong? Is there any way to activate it.
Looking forward for ur reply.
Regards,
Lokesh
Similar Messages
-
Mapping Not sufficiently defined
Hi,
I'm creating maps between DTDs & IDOCs. I have mapped all the required fields. Some required fields that cannot be mapped, I have disabled them. But on activation, I still get the message "Mapping Not sufficiently defined".
What am I missing?
Thanks
AshwiniHi,
did you map for all the mandatory fields of the target structure ? check out did u miss any fields .. this you can find with Red color..
Also check did you map the target structure root node...
before this activate the message type and continue
Regards,
moorthy -
Mapping Problem-Mapping not sufficient Error Message
Hello SDNers,
I m facing one problem, details are as below
Source Structure
MT_Source
Invoice 1..unbound
Type 1..1
Invoice Header 1..1
PartyID
ID 1..1
DocuID
ID 1..1
InvoiceLine 1..unbound
Item 1.1
InvoiceSubline 1.unbound
costCentre 1..1
GL Code 1..1
Target Structure
MT_Target
Target 1.unbound
Bgr00
Stype 1..1
Xkeep 1..1
Bkpf 1..1
Stype 1..1
Tcode 1..1
Bldat 1..1
bukrs 1..1
Bseg 1..1
Stype 1..1
Tbnam 1..1
newbs 1..1
wrbtr 1..1
zunor 1..1
Bseg1 1..unbound
Stype 1..1
Tbnam 1..1
newbs 1..1
wrbtr 1..1
zunor 1..1
Mapping need to be done in such a way like
Invoice Header must go in the corresponding fields of BKPF ,BSEG
Invoice Line fields must go in the corresponding fields of BSEG1
I tried split by Value with a user defined function copyPerValue
public void copyPerValue(String[] a,String[] b,ResultList result,Container container){
for(int i=0;i<=a.length;i++)
result.addValue(b[0]);
InvoiceLine----
CopyPerValue ->SplitBYValue[EachValue]->bldat
DocumentDateTime----
but I m getting Mapping not sufficient Error Message.
Pls help me in getting resolve this problem.
Thx in advanceHi;
Just check that all the mandatory fields (1.1 occurances) are mapped.
No node in the target message should be left red.
Mudit -
IDocs not created in file to IDoc scenario
Hi all
I am trying this file to IDoc scenario.
File picked up successfully and sent to R/3 Backend But Idoc is not posted the status records
In /n we05 in R/3 Backend shows that EDI: Partner profile inbound not available
I created/tested all basics like RFC dest, port etc.
File service that I am using is a business service hence I am specifying a Logical system name in
<b>Adapter specific Identifiers</b> of the file service.
I disabled EDI_DC40 control tag record as IDoc adapter
takes care of it.
So at first I tried the configuration of IDoc comm. Channel by checking the Apply control record values from payload
But SXMB monitor gave an error regarding this control record tag I guess as we have disabled it so there wont be any values
for control record in payload (correct me if I am wrong).
So I unchecked the checkbox Apply control record values from payload and monitor showed up as successfully processed.
But in the backend I am getting this error regarding partner profile.
I also tried to use an existing profile (<b>LS</b> type) by modifying its inbound parameters to accept <b>CREMAS</b> Idoc.
But the error is as persistent as me
Pls help
SudhirHi
Sender --> LEGACY, maintained in SLD (Logical system).
Receiver--> ENI maintained in SLD with logical sys name M700.
Partner Profile LEGACY maintained in R3.
<b>Following is the IDocOutbound in SXMB monitor in XI</b>.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
- <!-- Response
-->
- <SAP:IDocOutbound xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30">
<SAP:TABNAM>EDI_DC40</SAP:TABNAM>
<SAP:MANDT>100</SAP:MANDT>
<SAP:DOCREL>640</SAP:DOCREL>
<SAP:DOCNUM>0000000000001013</SAP:DOCNUM>
<SAP:DIRECT>2</SAP:DIRECT>
<SAP:IDOCTYP>CREMAS03</SAP:IDOCTYP>
<SAP:CIMTYP />
<SAP:MESTYP>CREMAS</SAP:MESTYP>
<SAP:MESCOD />
<SAP:MESFCT />
<SAP:SNDPOR>SAPAXI</SAP:SNDPOR>
<SAP:SNDPRN>LEGACY</SAP:SNDPRN>
<SAP:SNDPRT>LS</SAP:SNDPRT>
<SAP:SNDPFC />
<SAP:RCVPOR>SAPENI</SAP:RCVPOR>
<SAP:RCVPRN>M700</SAP:RCVPRN>
<SAP:RCVPRT>LS</SAP:RCVPRT>
<SAP:RCVPFC />
<SAP:TEST />
<SAP:SERIAL />
<SAP:EXPRSS />
<SAP:STD />
<SAP:STDVRS />
<SAP:STATUS />
<SAP:OUTMOD />
<SAP:SNDSAD />
<SAP:SNDLAD />
<SAP:RCVSAD />
<SAP:RCVLAD />
<SAP:STDMES />
<SAP:REFINT />
<SAP:REFGRP />
<SAP:REFMES />
<SAP:CREDAT>0000-00-00</SAP:CREDAT>
<SAP:CRETIM>00:00:00</SAP:CRETIM>
<SAP:ARCKEY>DF57A2C0532811D9AD84000F206A031B</SAP:ARCKEY>
</SAP:IDocOutbound>
<b>Control record of IDoc in R3</b>
Tab: Typeinfo
Basic type-->CREMAS03
Message Type-->CREMAS
Tab: Partner
Recipient
Port -->SAPENI
Partner Number--> M700
Partner Type-->LS
Sender
Port -->SAPAXI
Partner Number--> LEGACY
Partner Type-->LS
Pls help
Regards
Sudhir -
Error msg: "Mapping not sufficient"
There is a scenario wherein I have to map a single record to two IDOCs, I created a message map in such a way that the source side record's cardinality is 0..1 and the destination side IDOC's cardinality is 0..2, while testing the message map I get this error
"Mapping Object XXXXXX incomplete.
Structure with min!=max without mapping"
I am a fresher to XI, please help me to understand what this error means and how to correct the same. Thanks in advance!Hi Ezhil,
What do u mean by "the destination side IDOC's cardinality is 0..2"?
If you are trying to send multiple idocs to the receiver, you should see this blog:
/people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/12/04/xi-idoc-bundling--the-trick-with-the-occurance-change
Regards,
Divija -
Out of Memory problem at large IDocs (HRMD_A.HRMD_A06)
Hello,
we need help at the following problem:
We send HRMD_A.HRMD_A06 IDocs in a IDOC->XI->IDOC Scenario.
In this scenario there is a small graphical Mapping. When
we send 100 Idocs, after 15 - 30 Minutes all queues are stopped and the error "Out of Memory" is showing.
We have configured that Large IDocs are running in own queues (Max. 3 parallel), but the error is still there.
Only Solution this time is to restart the queues repeatly and at anytime the Idocs are all going through.
Has anyone a idea what we can do ?
Regards,
ChristianThanks for answers,
now after 15-30 Minutes a new Error shows:
"Timelimit Overstepped" - In German Original "Zeitlimit Überschritten".
and all Queues stopped.
What can i do ?
Regards
Christian -
Complete file not displayed in File server(Idoc - XI File scenerio)
Hi,
Am working on Idoc-XI-File scenerio.
The target file is getting generated properly and complete xml n Adapter Monitoring in RWB.
But in the file server(in the directory)only part of the xml is displayed.The size of the file is 82KB.
Is there any configuration need to see the complete file in File Server.Hi Amit,
This could be due to Network. How far is the file server from XI server?
I suggest putting the file in to local machine or in the same network and check whether it is OK.
- Pinkle -
Hi Experts
I have facing some confusion when i am doing mapping for my scenario FILE to IDOC.
The IDOC Structure is as follows
HeaderRecord 0-1
DataRecord1 0-unbounded
(Subnode)DataRecord2 0-unbounded
(Subnode)DataRecord4 0-unbounded
DataRecord5 0-unbounded
(subnode) DataRecord6 0-unbounded
TrailerRecord 0-1
when the DataRecord1 is executed, an idoc is generated and all the DataRecord2,DataRecord4,DataRecord6 shld come under that particular Idoc. And when another Idoc is generated,all the DataRecord2,DataRecord5,DataRecord6 shld come under that particular Idoc.
How to achieve mapping for this??
please help me out.
Edited by: vemuganti naga phalguna on Oct 27, 2010 7:56 AM
Edited by: vemuganti naga phalguna on Oct 27, 2010 7:59 AMHi
1) Source file is Text File.
sample source data.
A|20101006142345|SAPQMP|40|
B|5999|R00003D||N|20072008|Unknown|
C|T0014|M1556||colourless Pale yellow||Receipt-Bulk|1|Yes|Y|Text||
C|T0001|M1556||Limpid liquid ||Receipt-Bulk|1|Yes|Y|Text||
C|T1379|M1398|18||23|Receipt-Bulk|1|Yes|Y|Number|mm²/s|
B|5998|R00014A||N|20072008|Unknown|
C|T0014|M0211||2.0||CoA|1|No|Y|Text||
C|T0014|M0211||2.0||Receipt-Bulk|1|No|Y|Text||
C|T0014|M0211||2.0||Transfer|1|No|Y|Text||
C|T0051|M0271|97|||CoA|1|No|Y|Number|None|
C|T0073|M1356|Pass|||Receipt-Bulk|1|No|Y|||
C|T0073|M1356|Pass|||Transfer|1|No|Y|||
C|T0025|M0331||0.880||CoA|1|No|Y||g/ml|
C|T0025|M0331||0.880||Receipt-Bulk|1|No|Y||g/ml|
C|T0025|M0331||0.880||Transfer|1|No|Y||g/ml|
C|T0001|M1556||Clear & Bright ||CoA|1|No|Y|Text||
C|T0049|M0341|28.0||32.0|CoA|1|No|Y|Number|mm²/s|
C|T0049|M0341|28.0||32.0|Receipt-Bulk|1|No|Y|Number|mm²/s|
C|T0049|M0341|28.0||32.0|Transfer|1|No|Y|Number|mm²/s|
C|T0042|M0422|||-15|CoA|1|No|Y||°C|
C|T0092|M0578|||16|CoA|1|No|Y|Number|% Loss|
C|T0021|M0199||||CoA|1|No|Y||minutes|
C|T0039|M1453|Mktble|||CoA|1|No|Y|||
C|T0050|M0341||5.1||CoA|1|No|Y|Number|mm²/s|
C|T0050|M0341||5.1||Receipt-Bulk|1|No|Y|Number|mm²/s|
C|T0050|M0341||5.1||Transfer|1|No|Y|Number|mm²/s|
C|T0026|M0412|210|||CoA|1|No|Y|Number|°C|
Z|20101006142355|SAPQMP|40|
where Records A indicate File Header, Z indicates File Trailer
Recodrs B indicateds Material header and Would be repeating multiple times
No. of B Records = No. of Idocs generated with corresponding C records data which indicates Component Rows (multiple)
i.e as many B records file contains, that many Idoc will be created
For Mapping I require B and C Records. Field Separator is Pipe | symbol
I need to Ignore A B C Z
How to define the source structure and the respective FCC Parameters
please help me out -
Pass through scenario in SAP PI with no mapping for File to IDoc and Idoc to file scenarios
Hi Experts,
Can i have step by step process in SAP PI for pass through scenario with no mapping in case of file to Idoc and Idoc to file both cases please.
What objects i can skip.
My PI system is 7.3 dual stack.
I have seen below blogs, still its confusing to me.
When and how to create an scenario in SAP PI without mapping objects.
Pass Through Scenario with no Mapping in PI 7.1
Appreciate your help on this.
Regards,
Mohan.Hi Mohan
In pass thru interface you don't need to create any ESR objects, only ID objects are required.
Just Create a Receiver Determination and Receiver Agreement for your scenario (no need for Interface Det. and Sender Agreement).
Specify the IDOC in the Sender Interface and namespace as urn:sap-com:document:sap:idoc:messages
Or instead of creating objects manually, Run the wizard with Idoc name/namespace in sender/receiver interface
Regards
Osman -
TO MAP ANSIX12 FILE TO IDOC ORDERS04
HI ALL,
i HAVE A FILE WITH THE DATA IN ANSIX12 AND I HAVE TO CONVERT IT TO IDOC ..
CAN ANY ONE GUIDE ME.
THANKXhi ,
I have to map the ansi x12 file to idoc meta data and for mapping do i need to write a XML schema for the the ansix12 file .. i need help reagrding this .
thankx . -
Lookup issue for File to Idoc scenario-- Urgent Pls.
Hi All,
Iam doing File to IDoc scenario with one file --> any of 3 R/3 systems.
Routing has to be done dynamically using a lookup file, based on the incoming GLN code and last character of the Order Reference number.
The last character of the Order ref Num will have A,B or C.
Where, ' A' for R/3 152 Client
' B' for R/3 142 Client
'C' for R/3 132 Client.
1. PlantGLN_Routing lookup file :
DestinationSystem, Plant GLNCode, Partner Number,
A, 5000243000473, GDKDVRC152,
B, 5000243000473, GDKDVRC142,
C, 5000243000473, GDKDVRC132,
A 500034000487 GDKDVRC152,
B 500034000487 GDKDVRC142,
C 500034000487 GDKDVRC132,
By Using DestinationSystem and Plant GLN Code as lookup key --> I need to get the value of partner system.
2. IdocCtrlLookup
Purpose: To read the IdocCtrlLookup file to populate the Idoc control segment
Now based on the partner system from previous table --> I need to get the details of Sender Port , Sender Partner Type , Sender Partner Function , Sender Partner Number , Rx Port , Rx Partner Type , Rx Partner Function , Rx Partner Number.
Please help me how can acheive this scenario with the help of lookups.
Its very urgent.
Regards
Krupakar.HI,
Here you would have to use one mapping for dynamic routing , based on this create IM and use it in receiver determination.
the another mapping is general to file to idoc.
see the dynamic routing link here
Dynamic Configuration of Some Communication Channel Parameters using Message Mapping -
/people/william.li/blog/2006/04/18/dynamic-configuration-of-some-communication-channel-parameters-using-message-mapping
Also if you know the field name the context object can be defined for partner no that can be used in receiver determination in condition. to particular partner no in receiver determination.
Regards
Chilla -
XSL Interface Mapping - Recover name of file
Good evening,
I am using XSL interface mapping to convert a file to idoc and I need to recover the name of the file to insert it in the idoc.
I have been looking for in XSL manuals for an answer and I haven't find it.
How can I recover the name of the file that I'm trying to map to idoc?
Best Regards,
Nuriahi,
right after you create an IDOC in your XSLT mapping
create another mapping - message mapping (this time IDOC to IDOC)
and put it into your interface determination
put the code from my blog:
/people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/11/10/xi-the-same-filename-from-a-sender-to-a-receiver-file-adapter--sp14
and you will have the name
Regards,
michal -
Java heap space error occured during message mapping of FILE to IDOC
hello Friends,
I am trying to do the message mapping for File to Idoc scenario.
Idoc which I am using is HRMD_A.HRMD_A06 and infotype which I want to update is 14. I am trying to map the message type which I hav created for infotype 14 with the IDOC
Its very simple scenerio but every time I try to save the mapping before activating it I get an error:
Java heap space
Internal problem occurred (INTERNAL_PROBLEM)
Java heap space.
I am not able to figure out what possibly is the problem wheather its from my end or the BASIS end.
Kindly help.
Regards,
LokeshAs the server probably survives (you restart your Integration Builder and can probably connect immediately), the problem will be on your side (client). Did you add one or more large xml-test-instances to the mapping ? If yes, delete them, because they lower the performance and can make problems. If not, then this is a strange problem. Even if the Idoc structure is complex, the mapping object itself cannot be that large.Is this problem only with this one mapping ?
CSY
Edited by: Christian Sy on Mar 9, 2010 6:26 AM -
Hi,
I have change pointers activated on an HR system, and I need to transfer the changes to an external application via XI.
The external application accepts 3 different types of messages (e.g I have 3 distinct message type in my design rep.) but on the HR we have only 1 type: HRMD_A idoc.
I could do multimapping 1:3 but depending on the content of the Idoc, not all 3 types of outgoing messages.
Would it be enough just to set the occurrence of the target messages to 0::1 and therefore if the mapping has no values for a certain message type, that one is not created ?
I just don't want to have empty files..
Cheers,
gregThe external application accepts 3 different types of messages (e.g I have 3 distinct message type in my design rep.) but on the HR we have only 1 type: HRMD_A idoc.
-->if you have only one type then simply map that one type and ignore the others, this shd not create empty files.
Would it be enough just to set the occurrence of the target messages to 0::1 and therefore if the mapping has no values for a certain message type, that one is not created ?
-->you can do this too...but if you are able to change the target sturcture y don't you remove the other two structures that you will never use? i think there is no need to include any of the other type structure other than HRMD_A in your target message. -
Doubt in fields - message mapping (file 2 idoc scenario)
while doing message mapping in file 2 idoc scenario, i could not able find the values for some field names
( i am following this wiki help
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/wiki?path=/display/profile/2007/05/11/fileToIDOC& )
cremas04 idoc
vendorNo LIFNR
vendor name Name1
Pur_org ? ( I could not able locate field with the similar desc in idoc MT side)
Company code ?
Acc_Grp ?
Search term MCOD1
Address ADRNR
City ORT01
Pin_code PSLTZ
could you help me out with this?
Message was edited by: praba
prabahi,
I got the answer.
Maybe you are looking for
-
i read a lot about this topic and the question was marked answered, but there was no answer, sooo... this is just a heads up to apple that this problem still exists and many people are still having it! Please do something... you put this mini display
-
I just bought a MacBook Pro. I have Word 2008 on a DVD which I used for my old Mac. How do I download it on the new MacBook since it has no DVD drive?
-
Hi Gurus, We are trying to create a query using the standard Query Wizard in B1. When we try to save the query, the system triggers the error message below and fails to save the query. Error: To generate this document, first define the numbering seri
-
Assigning object name dynamically !!!
Dear Friends, Is it possible to assign the object name dynamically. Something like this ... class DynamicObject public static void main(String ggg[]) int runtime= ....getNumber(); // ... some method which returns int and val returned is dynamic for (
-
I have 2gb of other data on my iPad how do I find out what it is
I have 2gb of other data on my iPad which I want to remove I've cleared out as much if the photos, videos and books I want to remove as well as the apps and music(no music at all). But this other section is proving impossible to see even when I go in