Mapping Not sufficiently defined

Hi,
I'm creating maps between DTDs & IDOCs. I have mapped all the required fields. Some required fields that cannot be mapped, I have disabled them. But on activation, I still get the message "Mapping Not sufficiently defined".
What am I missing?
Thanks
Ashwini

Hi,
did you map for all the mandatory fields of the target structure ? check out did u miss any fields .. this you can find with Red color..
Also check did you map the target structure root node...
before this activate the message type and continue
Regards,
moorthy

Similar Messages

Mapping not sufficiently defined FILE TO IDOC(HRMD_A.HRMD_A06) scenerio

Hello friends,
In message mapping part from File to IDOC. I am doing mapping of infotype 14 message type with the corresponding idoc. But when I activate it I am getting the following error:
Activation of the change list canceled Check result for Message Mapping MM_INF14_LS | urn:tcs:test: Mapping not sufficiently defined
As far as I know I have properly mapped the fields which I am picking from the file. But I am not very sure what to do woth few fields in the IDOC which appear to be red in message mapping
Kindly give me the solution.
Regards,
Lokesh

Thanx guys...I tried changing the description of other mappings whch were already activated. And thn I tried activating I got the same error:
Activation of the change list canceled Check result for Message Mapping MM_02IT | urn:tcs:payroll: Starting compilation Source code has syntax error: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: com/sun/tools/javac/Main Exception in thread "main"
what possibly can go wrong? Is there any way to activate it.
Looking forward for ur reply.
Regards,
Lokesh

Mapping Problem-Mapping not sufficient Error Message

Hello SDNers,
I m facing one problem, details are as below
Source Structure
MT_Source
   Invoice                               1..unbound
           Type                                          1..1
           Invoice Header                      1..1
              PartyID
                        ID                           1..1
              DocuID
                        ID                           1..1
           InvoiceLine                            1..unbound
          Item                            1.1
                 InvoiceSubline                        1.unbound
                        costCentre                          1..1
                        GL Code                          1..1
Target Structure
MT_Target
         Target                                                                     1.unbound
              Bgr00
                    Stype                                                            1..1
                    Xkeep                                                           1..1
              Bkpf                                    1..1
             Stype                                1..1
                    Tcode                                 1..1
                    Bldat                                                                1..1
                    bukrs                                  1..1
              Bseg                                    1..1
             Stype                                1..1
                    Tbnam                                 1..1
                    newbs                                                               1..1
                    wrbtr                                  1..1
                     zunor                                                                1..1
              Bseg1                                    1..unbound
             Stype                                1..1
                    Tbnam                                 1..1
                    newbs                                                               1..1
                    wrbtr                                  1..1
                     zunor                                                                1..1
Mapping need to be done in such a way like
Invoice Header must go in the corresponding fields of BKPF ,BSEG
Invoice Line fields must go in the corresponding fields of BSEG1
I tried split by Value with a user defined function copyPerValue
public void copyPerValue(String[] a,String[] b,ResultList result,Container container){
for(int i=0;i<=a.length;i++)
          result.addValue(b[0]);
InvoiceLine----
                                        CopyPerValue ->SplitBYValue[EachValue]->bldat
DocumentDateTime----
but I m getting Mapping not sufficient Error Message.
Pls help me in getting resolve this problem.
Thx in advance

Hi;
Just check that all the mandatory fields (1.1 occurances) are mapped.
No node in the target message should be left red.
Mudit

Error msg: "Mapping not sufficient"

There is a scenario wherein I have to map a single record to two IDOCs, I created a message map in such a way that the source side record's cardinality is 0..1 and the destination side IDOC's cardinality is 0..2, while testing the message map I get this error
"Mapping Object XXXXXX incomplete.
Structure with min!=max without mapping"
I am a fresher to XI, please help me to understand what this error means and how to correct the same. Thanks in advance!

Hi Ezhil,
What do u mean by "the destination side IDOC's cardinality is 0..2"?
If you are trying to send multiple idocs to the receiver, you should see this blog:
/people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/12/04/xi-idoc-bundling--the-trick-with-the-occurance-change
Regards,
Divija

Interface Mapping Not Found in Integration Directory

Hey guys!
I'am getting this error in the test configuration part of the integration directory:
"Interface Mapping: <Not Found> com.sap.aii.utilxi.misc.api.BaseRuntimeException thrown during application mapping"
I don't see why I should be getting this error since I have properly defined a message and interface mapping for the receiving interface.
BTW, I get this error when I use XSLT mapping. If I point my interface mapping to a normal message mapping, I get no error. Is there anything I am missing?
Regards,
Glenn

The weird thing is that when I test the the configuration in the Integration Directory, it is still looking for my old message mapping (the one i created using xi editor) even though I already replaced the referenced message mapping in the interface mapping to the XSL one.
Yes, I tested the interface mapping with the same data using the XSL mapping and there's no problem.
When I send the message though, I get an error saying "NO_RECEIVER_CASE_ASYNC" I really don't see why it should not recognize the receiver. I tried refreshing the cache but it still looks for my old mapping program...
:P

Value mapping not working properly

Hi All,
I am using value mapping twice in same mapping program. But only 1 field is coming with value and other is taking same value from source payload, can you please tell me what can be issue here?
Value mapping 1 -
Context - http://sap.com/xi/XI
SenderParty- SenderSchema
ReceiverParty- ReceiverSchema
Value Mapping table in ID -
Value mapping at field 2 -
Context - http://sap.com/xi/XI
SenderParty1- SenderSchema1
ReceiverParty2- ReceiverSchema2
Value Mapping table in ID -
Source payload -
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<ns0:MT_VM_Send xmlns:ns0="http://xyz.com/Rashmi_CollectPatternDemo">
   <Record>
      <Emp_ID>123</Emp_ID>
      <Name>rash</Name>
      <Surname>sumit</Surname>
      <Gender>Male</Gender>
     <Grade>E2</Grade>
</Record>
</ns0:MT_VM_Send>
Target Payload -
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<ns0:MT_VM_Receiver xmlns:ns0="http://xyz.com/Rashmi_CollectPatternDemo">
<Record>
<Emp_ID>123</Emp_ID>
<Full_Name>rash sumit</Full_Name>
<Designation>E2</Designation>
<Gender>M</Gender>
<Travel_Mode>Train</Travel_Mode>
</Record>
</ns0:MT_VM_Receiver>
Here travel_mode is coming perfect, but designation is same as defined in source payload. Why here Value mapping not working???
Thanks & regards,
Rashmi Joshi

Hi Rashmi,
The problem would either be in cache update or your mapping. Please provide the sceenshot of mapping (after clicking the value mapping function).
you can also choose the option to throw error in value mapping function, so it will throw error when value not found.
regards,
Harish

$DBConnection_OLTP is not well define - OBIE Applicatn 7.9.6 / DAC 10.1.3.4

In new version of DAC, once you setup the Physical Data Sources then while setting the Parameters for Execution PLan, there is a drop down list which gives all the available Physical Data Source. You cannot mistype it.
The Physical Data Sources have been setup and the Test Connection gives me Successful message but when i run the DAC Tasks, i get following error: $DBConnection_OLTP is not well defined. If you see the log below, the variable for $DBConnection_OLTP is properly assigned to PSFT_8_9_FINSCM.
INFO     5/26/2009 7:32:30 PM     node89_pawantech     3924     LM_36488     Session task instance [SDE_PSFT_TimeDimension_Calendar] : [VAR_27028 Use override value [*DataWarehouse*] for session parameter:[*$DBConnection_OLAP*].]
INFO     5/26/2009 7:32:30 PM     node89_pawantech     3924     LM_36488     Session task instance [SDE_PSFT_TimeDimension_Calendar] : [VAR_27028 Use override value [*PSFT_8_9_FINSCM*] for session parameter:[*$DBConnection_OLTP*].]
INFO     5/26/2009 7:32:30 PM     node89_pawantech     3924     LM_36488     Session task instance [SDE_PSFT_TimeDimension_Calendar] : [VAR_27028 Use override value [PSFT_8_9_FINSCM.DATAWAREHOUSE.SDE_PSFT_89_Adaptor.SDE_PSFT_TimeDimension_Calendar.log] for session parameter:[$PMSessionLogFile].]
INFO     5/26/2009 7:32:30 PM     node89_pawantech     3924     LM_36488     Session task instance [SDE_PSFT_TimeDimension_Calendar] : [VAR_27028 Use override value [11] for mapping parameter:[$$DATASOURCE_NUM_ID].]
INFO     5/26/2009 7:32:30 PM     node89_pawantech     3924     LM_36488     Session task instance [SDE_PSFT_TimeDimension_Calendar] : [VAR_27028 Use override value [DEFAULT] for mapping parameter:[$$TENANT_ID].]
ERROR     5/26/2009 7:32:30 PM     node89_pawantech     3924     LM_36488     Session task instance [SDE_PSFT_TimeDimension_Calendar] : [CMN_1761 Timestamp Event: [Tue May 26 19:32:30 2009]]
ERROR     5/26/2009 7:32:30 PM     node89_pawantech     3924     LM_36488     Session task instance [SDE_PSFT_TimeDimension_Calendar] : [TM_6193 An error occurred while expanding the connection parameter [Database connection name PSFT_8_9_FINSCM for database connection variable *$DBConnection_OLTP is not well defined*.
ERROR     5/26/2009 7:32:30 PM     node89_pawantech     3924     LM_36488     Session task instance [SDE_PSFT_TimeDimension_Calendar] : [CMN_1761 Timestamp Event: [Tue May 26 19:32:30 2009]]
ERROR     5/26/2009 7:32:30 PM     node89_pawantech     3924     LM_36488     Session task instance [SDE_PSFT_TimeDimension_Calendar] : [TM_6270 Error: Variable parameter expansion error.]
ERROR     5/26/2009 7:32:30 PM     node89_pawantech     1860     LM_36320     Session task instance [SDE_PSFT_TimeDimension_Calendar]: Execution failed.
WARNING     5/26/2009 7:32:30 PM     node89_pawantech     1860     LM_36331     Session task instance [SDE_PSFT_TimeDimension_Calendar] failed and its "fail parent if this task fails" setting is turned on. So, Workflow [SDE_PSFT_TimeDimension_Calendar] will be failed.
ERROR     5/26/2009 7:32:30 PM     node89_pawantech     1860     LM_36320     Workflow [SDE_PSFT_TimeDimension_Calendar]: Execution failed.

You are correct.... I was able to run the DAC processes successfully with the old application.... 7.9.5.
I guess bad timing hit me bad. I just had loaded the older version and was about to continue... Then the new version came in which supported the latest PeopleSoft version and had Budgets and Projects module in it.
Now when i uninstalled and re-installed, i hit another problem where something went wrong with Informatica.... I had Key recognition issue.... So i reformatted my laptop all over and started from Fresh.... I was able to load everything and everything was smooth until i hit this other problem now....
I surely have an option to go back to old version but then i loose some of the new functionality.... So before i am compelled to go there, i want to give this a try as best as possible.
Will Oralce Support the SR in Oracle Metalink if we have not purchased the Application? My client has only purchased the OBIE Enterprise Suite.... But i am playing with this Application to get an understanding of this product.
Thanks,
Edited by: Dinesh.Gupta on May 29, 2009 6:59 AM
Edited by: Dinesh.Gupta on May 29, 2009 7:14 AM

Could not use the clone stamp tool because the area to clone has not been defined

Freshly installed Elements 10. Can not use the option-mouse click to define an area for the clone stamp. The error I get is:
Could not use the clone stamp tool because the area to clone has not been defined (option-click to define a source point).
New Mac Mini. Had the same problems in Elements 9 so I installed the 10 trial. Is this a key binding error? Did not have this issue with Elements 9 on my Mac Air or my Windows 7 system.
I'm not a newbie and know how to use the clone tool. I won't say I'm an expert so if it's something related to layers please throw out some ideas.

This problem came back up. I hadn't used PSE since last November and was frustrated to run into it again. I don't think it's a layers issue afterall.
I use a wireless keyboard and mouse on Mini and mouse on Air, although keyboard for Air is upstairs at a desk with monitor for occasional use. Regardless blue tooth is on for these devices. Problem exists. Turn bluetooth off on Air and the problem is gone. It must be related to option key when bluetooth is on, I guess some different mapping. Even when I have bluetooth on and try to use Option key on the Air keyboard it does not work.
So now where do I look for configs to check?

Class type has not been defined in Customizing as allowed for variant confi

Hi,
I want to use class type 200 in the varient configuration, but following error is showing so please reply me .
Class type 200 cannot be used for materials
Message no. CU731
Diagnosis
This class type has not been defined in Customizing as allowed for variant configuration.
Procedure
Choose a class type which is allowed for variant configuration.
Thanks

Thanks for ur reply.
please help me regarding my requirements
I will have to use the varient configuration. In this scenario multilevel BOM BOMis present & for every level varient is present.
so how to map this scenario, so that it should pop up at the time of sales order creation. i.e. it should ask that which varient should be used at all the levels in the BOM.
Thanks & Regards.
Abhi

The budget amount is not sufficient for release

Dear All,
Fund Management: Error. when posting budgeting document with transaction code FMBB and FMBBC, I am getting error massage " The budget amount is not sufficient for release.
Message no. FMKU083
The budget amount is not sufficient for release
Diagnosis
The Eligible released budget is greater than the Eligible consumable budget for FM account assignment QPCP/Q001/QP-ADMINEXPENSES/QPIL.
Please note that the absolute value of the amount is specified. Even if the actual amount is negative, the comparison will always be made with the positive value.
Total released budget = Release Budget to be posted by the current document + Release Budget already in the Database.
Total budget = Budget to be posted by the current document + Budget already in the Database.
u2022     (Absolute) Total Eligible released budget = 200,000.00
u2022     (Absolute) Total Eligible consumable budget = 0.00
Important remark concerning the release on period:
The document to be created includes the amount on the period. But the check "Release against Budget" will nevertheless involve the amounts of the whole fiscal year.
Example:
Released budget on period 10 = 100
Budget on period 10 = 600
So, unreleased budget on period 10 = 500
But as:
Total Release Budget over the fiscal year = 980
and Total Budget over the fiscal year = 1000
980 + 500 > 1000 so the release cannot be done. An error message FMKU083 is displayed and the values in the long text are:
(Absolute) Total released budget = 1480
(Absolute) Total budget = 1000
System Response
Processing stops. The error is displayed in the application log.
Procedure
There are two options for further processing:
u2022     You can post a further amount to be included in the Eligible budget.
u2022     You can decrease the amount of Eligible released budget to be posted.
Do the Needful,
hope for the best solution..
Regards,
LC..

Hi Waman Shirwaicar
I have applied the below Notes,
Note 1092634 Budget Release: error FMKU 083
Note 1328037 FMMPRELE: error FMKU083
Total released budget = Release Budget to be posted by the current document + Release Budget already in the Database.
Total budget = Budget to be posted by the current document + Budget already in the Database.
u2022     (Absolute) Total Eligible released budget = 200,000.00
u2022     (Absolute) Total Eligible consumable budget = 0.00
Important remark concerning the release on period:
The document to be created includes the amount on the period. But the check "Release against Budget" will nevertheless involve the amounts of the whole fiscal year.
but still getting the " The budget amount is not sufficient for release"
I have configured Control ledger "9H", in settings for availability control ledger
and unable to do Configuration for "9I"   define fitter settings for budget values -->Define Consumable budget & Define budget values as consumed amounts.
error: FM budget value do not enter ledger "9I" as consumed amounts.
and the difference between Control ledgers "9H & 9I" need solution for configuration of Control Ledger "9I".
do the needful.
your early action highly solicited.
hope for the solution.
Regards,
Lucky Pandu.

Map not recognized during runtime

While running a test (during runtime), the map is not being recognized
by the system. We have cleared SLD Cache in IR and ID, and using
SXI_CACHE several times and during runtime we still get the following
error about the map not being found. The error is as follows:
Runtime error Unable to find resource a1ebddd0-0d05-11dd-a1d7-
eecb0a0a3d7e in the following software component versions:
urn:ariba.com:xi:Procurement:CreatePurchaseOrdercom/sap/xi/tf/_MM_TX_WSPurchaseOrderPush_RequestM~-1
<Trace level="1" type="B">CL_MAPPING_XMS_PLSRV3-ENTER_PLSRV</Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">......attachment XI_Context not found </Trace><Trace level="3" type="T">Mapping already defined in interface
determination </Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Object ID of Interface Mapping
15D05B740F5D39BCBACC32BCA4E1FCE7 </Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Version ID of Interface Mapping
A1EBDDD00D0511DDA1D7EECB0A0A3D7E </Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Interface Mapping
urn:ariba.com:xi:Procurement:CreatePurchaseOrder
IFM_TX_WSPurchaseOrderPush_2_Z_ARIBA_KT_PO_CREATE </Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Mapping Steps 1 JAVA
com/sap/xi/tf/_MM_TX_WSPurchaseOrderPush_RequestMessage_2_Z_ARIBA_KT_PO_CREATE_REQUEST_ </Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">MTOM Attachments are Transferred to the
Payload </Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Dynamic Configuration Is Empty </Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">Mode 0 </Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Search
com/sap/xi/tf/_MM_TX_WSPurchaseOrderPush_RequestMessage_2_Z_ARIBA_KT_PO_CREATE_REQUEST_.class
(urn:ariba.com:xi:Procurement:CreatePurchaseOrder, -1) in swcv a1ebddd0-0d05-11dd-a1d7-eecb0a0a3d7e. </Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Search
com/sap/xi/tf/_MM_TX_WSPurchaseOrderPush_RequestMessage_2_Z_ARIBA_KT_PO_CREATE_REQUEST_.class (-1) in swcv a1ebddd0-0d05-11dd-a1d7-eecb0a0a3d7e
without namespace. </Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Unable to find resource
com/sap/xi/tf/_MM_TX_WSPurchaseOrderPush_RequestMessage_2_Z_ARIBA_KT_PO_CREATE_REQUEST_.class in the following software component versions:
a1ebddd0-0d05-11dd-a1d7-eecb0a0a3d7e
Thrown:
com.sap.aii.ib.core.mapping.execution.ResourceNotFoundException: Unable
to find resource
com/sap/xi/tf/_MM_TX_WSPurchaseOrderPush_RequestMessage_2_Z_ARIBA_KT_PO_CREATE_REQUEST_.class in the following software component versions:
a1ebddd0-0d05-11dd-a1d7-eecb0a0a3d7e
at com.sap.aii.ib.server.mapping.execution.JavaMapping.load
(JavaMapping.java:148)
at com.sap.aii.ib.server.mapping.execution.JavaMapping.executeStep
(JavaMapping.java:67)
at com.sap.aii.ib.server.mapping.execution.Mapping.execute
(Mapping.java:60)
at com.sap.aii.ib.server.mapping.execution.MappingHandler.map
(MappingHandler.java:87)
at com.sap.aii.ib.server.mapping.execution.MappingHandler.map
(MappingHandler.java:71)
at
com.sap.aii.ibrun.sbeans.mapping.MappingRequestHandler.handleMappingRequest(MappingRequestHandler.java:119)
at com.sap.aii.ibrun.sbeans.mapping.MappingRequestHandler.handleRequest
(MappingRequestHandler.java:72)
at com.sap.aii.ibrun.sbeans.mapping.MappingServiceImpl.processFunction
(MappingServiceImpl.java:79)
at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor511.invoke(Unknown Source)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke
(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585)
at
com.sap.engine.services.ejb3.runtime.impl.RequestInvocationContext.proceedFinal(RequestInvocationContext.java:46)
at
com.sap.engine.services.ejb3.runtime.impl.AbstractInvocationContext.proceed(AbstractInvocationContext.java:166)
at
com.sap.engine.services.ejb3.runtime.impl.Interceptors_StatesTransition.invoke(Interceptors_StatesTransition.java:19)
at
com.sap.engine.services.ejb3.runtime.impl.AbstractInvocationContext.proceed(AbstractInvocationContext.java:177)
at
com.sap.engine.services.ejb3.runtime.impl.Interceptors_Resource.invoke
(Interceptors_Resource.java:71)
at
com.sap.engine.services.ejb3.runtime.impl.AbstractInvocationContext.proceed(AbstractInvocationContext.java:177)
at
com.sap.engine.services.ejb3.runtime.impl.Interceptors_Transaction.doWorkWithAttribute(Interceptors_Transaction.java:38)
at
com.sap.engine.services.ejb3.runtime.impl.Interceptors_Transaction.invoke(Interceptors_Transaction.java:22)
at
com.sap.engine.services.ejb3.runtime.impl.AbstractInvocationContext.proceed(AbstractInvocationContext.java:177)
at
com.sap.engine.services.ejb3.runtime.impl.AbstractInvocationContext.proceed(AbstractInvocationContext.java:189)
at
com.sap.engine.services.ejb3.runtime.impl.Interceptors_StatelessInstanceGetter.invoke(Interceptors_StatelessInstanceGetter.java:16)
at
com.sap.engine.services.ejb3.runtime.impl.AbstractInvocationContext.proceed(AbstractInvocationContext.java:177)
at
com.sap.engine.services.ejb3.runtime.impl.Interceptors_SecurityCheck.invoke(Interceptors_SecurityCheck.java:21)
at
com.sap.engine.services.ejb3.runtime.impl.AbstractInvocationContext.proceed(AbstractInvocationContext.java:177)
at
com.sap.engine.services.ejb3.runtime.impl.Interceptors_ExceptionTracer.invoke(Interceptors_ExceptionTracer.java:16)
at
com.sap.engine.services.ejb3.runtime.impl.AbstractInvocationContext.proceed(AbstractInvocationContext.java:177)
at
com.sap.engine.services.ejb3.runtime.impl.DefaultInvocationChainsManager.startChain(DefaultInvocationChainsManager.java:133)
at
com.sap.engine.services.ejb3.runtime.impl.DefaultEJBProxyInvocationHandler.invoke(DefaultEJBProxyInvocationHandler.java:164)
at $Proxy279.processFunction(Unknown Source)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke
(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke
(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585)
at
com.sap.engine.services.rfcengine.RFCDefaultRequestHandler.handleRequest(RFCDefaultRequestHandler.java:183)
at
com.sap.engine.services.rfcengine.RFCJCOServer$J2EEApplicationRunnable.run(RFCJCOServer.java:267)
at com.sap.engine.core.thread.impl3.ActionObject.run
(ActionObject.java:37)
at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
at com.sap.engine.core.thread.impl3.SingleThread.execute
(SingleThread.java:182)
at com.sap.engine.core.thread.impl3.SingleThread.run
(SingleThread.java:280)
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="E">CL_XMS_PLSRV_MAPPING~ENTER_PLSRV</Trace>

In which system you are facing this problem?
If it is Developement system then do the following steps and then try again.
1. In your interface mapping remove the message mapping first and then activate the interface mapping.
2. Do some dummy change in your message mapping or rename the message mapping by copying it and activate it.
3. Now use this message mapping in your interface mapping and activate IM.
If it doesn't work delete all objects and recreate them. (or may be rename them ).
One more important thing... Check your Interface Determination and make sure the outbound & inbound message interfaces are exactly same as used in Interface Mapping.

Error on Purchase Order - Document number 45* not within defined interval

Hi All,
PLEASE HELP ME or guide me in the right direction.
I am faced with a somewhat unique case in our enviroment. Some background first.
Back in 2000 when we upgraded from Walker to SAP, a number of Purchase orders had to be migrated, one of them is the order i am struggling with. Back then very little validations were built in, resulting in a Local Order being incorrectly created as a International Order but against a local currency.
Now this ordered is still being reflected as open in our system. When attempting to change the order by activating the 'Delivery Complete indicator", we get an error "use only foreign currency" This is due to the fact that validations against Document Type and Currency was created in 2003 and are in full operation now. It is hard coded thus i can not remove this easily.
Now when attempting to get around this by changing the Document Type to a Local Purchase order or trying to delete a line, we get the error below.
"Document number 45* not within defined interval"
Number ranges do come to mind based on the error description, however, Local Orders have a number range of 45, International Orders have a number range of 47. In this case, the order is created as a International Order BUT the number range is 45*, again, due to a lack of validations/incorrect config back in 2000
Do any of you know a possible solution to such a problem.
Regards,
Jody Ponnusami.

The validation of document type and currency is not standard, and if this validation cannot be deactivated, then you will have to resort to making changes in debug mode. Put a breakpoint at the relevant check and force it to accept the current combination.
The second option is to update EKPO table manually using SE16N. Set the delivery completed indicator to X.

Logical System Name 'WD_RFC_METADATA_DEST' is not properly defined in SLD

Hi,
Im getting this error message:
<h3>
com.sap.tc.webdynpro.services.exceptions.WDRuntimeException: 'WD_RFC_METADATA_DEST' not properly defined! Unable to create Metadata connection for Dictionary Provider. Either the logical System Name 'WD_RFC_METADATA_DEST' has not been properly defined in the System Landscape Directory, or you are not using a MsgServerDestination (AppServerDestinations are not permitted for Metadata connections)
</h3>
What action should I take to fix this error? is this a web dynpro side error or basis error?
Thanks!

Dear TJ Ronald Amorado
Please test the JCO destination for the model data and meta data which you are using in the webdynpro model.
As per the error message you are getting 'WD_RFC_METADATA_DEST' is not defined in the QA.
Please create it in the QA manually and test it. Refer to document : - [http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/c0c1d495-048e-2b10-babd-924a136f56b5?QuickLink=index&overridelayout=true|http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/c0c1d495-048e-2b10-babd-924a136f56b5?QuickLink=index&overridelayout=true]
Copy the name of the modeldata and metadata and use the same name in logical destination during model creation in webdynpro.
Hope it will helps.
Best Regards
Arun Jaiswal

Qty balances are not sufficient in the Register

This messsage is getting while doing the J1IS
MMBE for 1000105 shows the quantity in stock yet while executing the transaction J1is it states material Qty balances is not sufficient in the register.
Let me tell you what they did
1.MIGO
2.Return Delivery
3.cancellation of 122 movement type by 123 movement type
4.Again Return delivery when they are trying the system is giving "Qty balances is not sufficient in the register" though in customization 123 movement type is allowed for excise invoices.
Pl. advise

Sagar,
Please try to update the qty in register by j1i5.
Regards,
Manish

Error Interface Mapping Not found..

Hi Friends,
I am simply using file to ABAP proxy scenario.
I am getting error as : This I am getting while test my configuration at Scenario level Tools - > Test Configuration..
Interface Mapping :
Runtime error
com.sap.aii.utilxi.misc.api.BaseRuntimeException thrown during application mapping com/sap/xi/tf/_MM_Source_Target_Proxy_: Parsing an empty source. Root element expected!
Plz help.
Regard
Deepak Sodhi

Hi Rajesh,
I am keeping the file as it is from Meassage mapping SRC File..
Message Mapping is giving me no error..
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<ns0:MT_Source_Proxy xmlns:ns0="https://tcsfenest/test">
   <EmpId>315143</EmpId>
   <EmpName>Deepak Sodhi</EmpName>
   <EmpOffc>Gurgaon</EmpOffc>
</ns0:MT_Source_Proxy>
Only at the time of Testing configuration Environment -> Test Scenario.
Its giving me error Interface mapping not found.. My strucuture is flat.
DT - Complex type
Empid element string
Empname element string
Empoffc element string
Please help to resolove this issue.
Regards
depak

Mapping Not sufficiently defined

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for