MappingInfoNotFoundException with one-many mapping to horizontal PC subclass

Hi,
I have a nasty niggling problem with a one-many mapping where the many
side is a horizontally-mapped persistent subclass:
kodo.util.FatalUserException: kodo.jdbc.meta.MappingInfoNotFoundException:
The reference mappings for one-to-many field "Invoice.openTrades" are not
in the table of the field's related persistent element
type.[Invoice.openTrades [kodo.jdbc.meta.OneToManyFieldMapping]]
     at
kodo.runtime.PersistenceManagerImpl.attach(PersistenceManagerImpl.java:4363)...
NestedThrowablesStackTrace:
kodo.jdbc.meta.MappingInfoNotFoundException: The reference mappings for
one-to-many field "Invoice.openTrades" are not in the table of the field's
related persistent element type.[Invoice.openTrades
[kodo.jdbc.meta.OneToManyFieldMapping]]
     at kodo.jdbc.meta.Mappings.invalidMapping(Mappings.java:134)
     at kodo.jdbc.meta.Mappings.invalidMapping(Mappings.java:120)
     at
kodo.jdbc.meta.OneToManyFieldMapping.fromMappingInfo(OneToManyFieldMapping.java:94)
     at
kodo.jdbc.meta.RuntimeMappingProvider.getFieldMapping(RuntimeMappingProvider.java:198)
     at
kodo.jdbc.meta.MappingRepository.getFieldMapping(MappingRepository.java:470)
     at
kodo.jdbc.meta.AbstractClassMapping.getFieldMapping(AbstractClassMapping.java:991)
     at
kodo.jdbc.meta.AbstractClassMapping.getFieldMapping(AbstractClassMapping.java:971)
     at
kodo.jdbc.meta.AbstractClassMapping.getMappings(AbstractClassMapping.java:934)
     at
kodo.jdbc.meta.AbstractClassMapping.getDeclaredFieldMappings(AbstractClassMapping.java:654)
     at
kodo.jdbc.meta.AbstractClassMapping.resolve(AbstractClassMapping.java:796)
     at kodo.jdbc.meta.MappingRepository.resolve(MappingRepository.java:431)
     at kodo.jdbc.meta.MappingRepository.getMapping(MappingRepository.java:349)
     at kodo.jdbc.meta.MappingRepository.getMapping(MappingRepository.java:177)
     at
kodo.jdbc.meta.MappingRepository.getMetaData(MappingRepository.java:165)
     at
kodo.runtime.PersistenceManagerImpl.makePersistent(PersistenceManagerImpl.java:2423)
     at
kodo.runtime.PersistenceManagerImpl.makePersistent(PersistenceManagerImpl.java:2375)
     at kodo.runtime.AttachManager.makePersistent(AttachManager.java:410)
     at kodo.runtime.AttachManager.attach(AttachManager.java:279)
     at kodo.runtime.AttachManager.attach(AttachManager.java:56)
     at
kodo.runtime.PersistenceManagerImpl.attach(PersistenceManagerImpl.java:4349)
I have another one-many mapping on the "one" class which is fine and is
almost identical to the invalid mapping - it joins on the same
columns/foreign key. The only real difference is that my invalid "many"
side is a horizontally mapped subclass (parent class mapped to different
table). When I took that class out of its hierarchy and mapped it as base,
it works. I don't know why Kodo is saying the mapping for the join is not
found, as the "many" side has an invoice field mapped as one-one. The
superclass does not have a relation to invoice mapped. A slight
complication is that Invoice itself has a persistent superclass persisted
in the same table, but nothing refers to that so I don't think it is
relevant.
Class diagram is roughly like this:
BaseTrade
|
Invoice 1-* Trade
BaseReceipt
|
Invoice 1-* Receipt
Invoice mapped to Invoice table; Trade mapped to Trade table but its
superclass mapped to diff BaseTrade table; Receipt and its superclass
BaseReceipt mapped to Receipt table.
I saw an earlier posting on the same exception that mentioned "collection
element-type" - mine is specified as "Trade", ie the subclass.
Is there any reason why this should not work?
I can provide you with .jdo and .mapping files if necessary.
Many thanks,
Alex

Alex-
Can you post your mapping? I just ran a test with a one-many relation to
a subclass of a horizontally mapped class, and it worked fine.
FYI, the example mapping I was using was:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mapping>
<package name="horizmany">
<class name="HorizManyOwner">
<jdbc-class-map type="base" pk-column="JDOID"
table="BUG1174OWNER"/>
<jdbc-version-ind type="version-number"
column="JDOVERSION"/>
<jdbc-class-ind type="in-class-name" column="JDOCLASS"/>
<field name="relation">
<jdbc-field-map type="one-many"
ref-column.JDOID="OWNER_JDOID" table="BUG1174RELATIONSUB"/>
</field>
</class>
<class name="HorizManyRelationSub">
<jdbc-class-map type="base" pk-column="JDOID"
table="BUG1174RELATIONSUB"/>
<jdbc-version-ind type="version-number"
column="JDOVERSION"/>
<jdbc-class-ind type="in-class-name" column="JDOCLASS"/>
<field name="horizmany.HorizManyRelationSuper.superString">
<jdbc-field-map type="value" column="SUPERSTRING"/>
</field>
<field name="owner">
<jdbc-field-map type="one-one"
column.JDOID="OWNER_JDOID"/>
</field>
<field name="subString">
<jdbc-field-map type="value" column="SUBSTRING0"/>
</field>
</class>
<class name="HorizManyRelationSuper">
<jdbc-class-map type="horizontal"/>
</class>
</package>
</mapping>
In article <[email protected]>, Alex Robbins wrote:
Hi,
I have a nasty niggling problem with a one-many mapping where the many
side is a horizontally-mapped persistent subclass:
kodo.util.FatalUserException: kodo.jdbc.meta.MappingInfoNotFoundException:
The reference mappings for one-to-many field "Invoice.openTrades" are not
in the table of the field's related persistent element
type.[Invoice.openTrades [kodo.jdbc.meta.OneToManyFieldMapping]]
     at
kodo.runtime.PersistenceManagerImpl.attach(PersistenceManagerImpl.java:4363)...
NestedThrowablesStackTrace:
kodo.jdbc.meta.MappingInfoNotFoundException: The reference mappings for
one-to-many field "Invoice.openTrades" are not in the table of the field's
related persistent element type.[Invoice.openTrades
[kodo.jdbc.meta.OneToManyFieldMapping]]
     at kodo.jdbc.meta.Mappings.invalidMapping(Mappings.java:134)
     at kodo.jdbc.meta.Mappings.invalidMapping(Mappings.java:120)
     at
kodo.jdbc.meta.OneToManyFieldMapping.fromMappingInfo(OneToManyFieldMapping.java:94)
     at
kodo.jdbc.meta.RuntimeMappingProvider.getFieldMapping(RuntimeMappingProvider.java:198)
     at
kodo.jdbc.meta.MappingRepository.getFieldMapping(MappingRepository.java:470)
     at
kodo.jdbc.meta.AbstractClassMapping.getFieldMapping(AbstractClassMapping.java:991)
     at
kodo.jdbc.meta.AbstractClassMapping.getFieldMapping(AbstractClassMapping.java:971)
     at
kodo.jdbc.meta.AbstractClassMapping.getMappings(AbstractClassMapping.java:934)
     at
kodo.jdbc.meta.AbstractClassMapping.getDeclaredFieldMappings(AbstractClassMapping.java:654)
     at
kodo.jdbc.meta.AbstractClassMapping.resolve(AbstractClassMapping.java:796)
     at kodo.jdbc.meta.MappingRepository.resolve(MappingRepository.java:431)
     at kodo.jdbc.meta.MappingRepository.getMapping(MappingRepository.java:349)
     at kodo.jdbc.meta.MappingRepository.getMapping(MappingRepository.java:177)
     at
kodo.jdbc.meta.MappingRepository.getMetaData(MappingRepository.java:165)
     at
kodo.runtime.PersistenceManagerImpl.makePersistent(PersistenceManagerImpl.java:2423)
     at
kodo.runtime.PersistenceManagerImpl.makePersistent(PersistenceManagerImpl.java:2375)
     at kodo.runtime.AttachManager.makePersistent(AttachManager.java:410)
     at kodo.runtime.AttachManager.attach(AttachManager.java:279)
     at kodo.runtime.AttachManager.attach(AttachManager.java:56)
     at
kodo.runtime.PersistenceManagerImpl.attach(PersistenceManagerImpl.java:4349)
I have another one-many mapping on the "one" class which is fine and is
almost identical to the invalid mapping - it joins on the same
columns/foreign key. The only real difference is that my invalid "many"
side is a horizontally mapped subclass (parent class mapped to different
table). When I took that class out of its hierarchy and mapped it as base,
it works. I don't know why Kodo is saying the mapping for the join is not
found, as the "many" side has an invoice field mapped as one-one. The
superclass does not have a relation to invoice mapped. A slight
complication is that Invoice itself has a persistent superclass persisted
in the same table, but nothing refers to that so I don't think it is
relevant.
Class diagram is roughly like this:
BaseTrade
|
Invoice 1-* Trade
BaseReceipt
|
Invoice 1-* Receipt
Invoice mapped to Invoice table; Trade mapped to Trade table but its
superclass mapped to diff BaseTrade table; Receipt and its superclass
BaseReceipt mapped to Receipt table.
I saw an earlier posting on the same exception that mentioned "collection
element-type" - mine is specified as "Trade", ie the subclass.
Is there any reason why this should not work?
I can provide you with .jdo and .mapping files if necessary.
Many thanks,
Alex
Marc Prud'hommeaux
SolarMetric Inc.

Similar Messages

FatalUserException / One-Many relation relinking

Hello all,
I have a problem with one-many relations and relinking... Let's have a
relation one-many between class Task and itself (classic parent-children
problem).
Initial Context
- T1 has 2 child (T2, T3)
What i need to do : move T3 as child of T2 to have :
- T1 has 1 child (T2)
- T2 has one child (T3)
How i do it (using a global transaction) :
transaction.begin();
// unlinking T3 from T1
T1.parent = null;
T3.getChildren().remove(T1)
// relink T3 to T2
T1.parent = T2;
T2.getChildren().add(T1);
transaction.commit();
I get this exception :
Attempt to set column "TASK.parent" to two different values: (class
java.lang.String)"T2", (null)"null" This can occur when you fail to set
both sides of a two-sided relation between objects, or when you map
different fields to the same column, but you do not keep the values of
these fields in synch.
When i test without a global transaction like this :
transaction.begin();
// unlinking T3 from T1
T1.parent = null;
T3.getChildren().remove(T1)
transaction.commit();
transaction.begin();
// relink T3 to T2
T1.parent = T2;
T2.getChildren().add(T1);
transaction.commit();
With atomic transaction, everything is always fine. My problem is that I
need to use global transaction because I need a global rollback and only
one commit per big process, so I can't use atomic transactions (atomic
commits takes too much time comparing to a global one) as this :
Here we're in a particular case where I need to relink a task from a
parent to its brother. In cases where new parent and old one have no
close links, global transactions work fine, so this exception is not
always thrown, which seems pretty weird to me.
Working case using global transaction :
=====================
a) initial context
T1 have 1 child(T2)
T3 have 0 child
b) actions
moving T2 to T3 with global transaction
c) result
T1 have 0 child
T3 have 1 child(T2)
=====================
This is very problematic and strange to me, so any help is welcomed...
Thomas

Looks like you use parent/children relationsheep wrongly. Try this instead:
transaction.begin();
// unlinking T3 from T1
//T1.parent = null;
T1.getChildren().remove(T3)
// relink T3 to T2
//T1.parent = T2;
T3.parent = T2;
T2.getChildren().add(T3);
transaction.commit();
"Thomas cornet" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
Hello all,
I have a problem with one-many relations and relinking... Let's have a
relation one-many between class Task and itself (classic parent-children
problem).
Initial Context
- T1 has 2 child (T2, T3)
What i need to do : move T3 as child of T2 to have :
- T1 has 1 child (T2)
- T2 has one child (T3)
How i do it (using a global transaction) :
transaction.begin();
// unlinking T3 from T1
T1.parent = null;
T3.getChildren().remove(T1)
// relink T3 to T2
T1.parent = T2;
T2.getChildren().add(T1);
transaction.commit();
I get this exception :
Attempt to set column "TASK.parent" to two different values: (class
java.lang.String)"T2", (null)"null" This can occur when you fail to set
both sides of a two-sided relation between objects, or when you map
different fields to the same column, but you do not keep the values of
these fields in synch.
When i test without a global transaction like this :
transaction.begin();
// unlinking T3 from T1
T1.parent = null;
T3.getChildren().remove(T1)
transaction.commit();
transaction.begin();
// relink T3 to T2
T1.parent = T2;
T2.getChildren().add(T1);
transaction.commit();
With atomic transaction, everything is always fine. My problem is that I
need to use global transaction because I need a global rollback and only
one commit per big process, so I can't use atomic transactions (atomic
commits takes too much time comparing to a global one) as this :
Here we're in a particular case where I need to relink a task from a
parent to its brother. In cases where new parent and old one have no
close links, global transactions work fine, so this exception is not
always thrown, which seems pretty weird to me.
Working case using global transaction :
=====================
a) initial context
T1 have 1 child(T2)
T3 have 0 child
b) actions
moving T2 to T3 with global transaction
c) result
T1 have 0 child
T3 have 1 child(T2)
=====================
This is very problematic and strange to me, so any help is welcomed...
Thomas

One Java Mapping - two Different IDOCs

Hi,
is it possible to create 2 different IDOCs(IDOCTYP or MESSTYP different) with one Java mapping?
thx

Or what is more interested, when mapping is done only for first message, in my case IDOC, it is ok, if ther isn't any second message. What is also confusing, when I run whole proces, system dumps for all cases, even for one IDOC message. Trace:
<Trace level="2" type="T">com.sap.engine.lib.xml.parser.NestedSAXParserException: Fatal Error: com.sap.engine.lib.xml.parser.ParserException: XML Declaration not allowed here.(:main:, row:1, col:44)(:main:, row=1, col=44) -> com.sap.engine.lib.xml.parser.ParserException: XML Declaration not allowed here.(:main:, row:1, col:44)</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">*** END APPLICATION TRACE ***</Trace>
Error:
xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand="">
<SAP:Category>XIServer</SAP:Category>
<SAP:Code area="MAPPING" />
<SAP:P1>unexpected end-of-file</SAP:P1>
<SAP:P2 />
<SAP:P3>1</SAP:P3>
<SAP:P4>1</SAP:P4>
<SAP:AdditionalText />
<SAP:ApplicationFaultMessage namespace="" />
<SAP:Stack>Exception CX_XMS_SYSERR_MAPPING occurred (program: CL_XMS_MAIN===================CP, include: CL_XMS_MAIN===================CM00A, line: 604).</SAP:Stack>
<SAP:Retry>M</SAP:Retry>

One to Many Mapping with different SQL types

We have an interesting one to many relationship in our system in which the source and target field SQL types do not match, but the values do. The relationship is actually between multiple entries in the same database table. So, imagine we have some table that looks sort of like this:
KEY ObjectID OwnerNo
100 1234     0
101 ABCD     1234
102 EFGH     1234ObjectID is defined as a varchar type, but Parent entries are guaranteed to have integer value ObjectIDs. Child entries point to the parent through the OwnerNo field, which defined in the database as a numeric.
A simple one-to-many mapping will give you the following SQL error on execution: [SQL0401] Comparison operator = operands not compatible.
I tried modifying my descriptor after load as follows:
   public static void modifyOneToMany(Descriptor descriptor)
       ExpressionBuilder builder = new ExpressionBuilder();
       Expression exp = builder.getField("OwnerNo").
          equal(builder.getField("ObjectID").toNumber());
       descriptor.getMappingForAttributeName("children")
          .setSelectionCriteria(exp);
   }But this introduces two problems in the generated SQL ( ... WHERE ((t0.OwnerNo = TO_NUMBER(t0.ObjectID) ... ). First, this generates a where clause using the function TO_NUMBER, which is not supported by DB2 on AS400, our database platform. Second, the table reference is off in the generated SQL--I couldn't find a way to specify that the right hand side of the = operator should be from the parent of the one to many mapping--both sides are referenced from the child context (t0).

I found the getFunction() method on Expression, so I can solve half of this problem with the following code:
   public static void modifyOneToMany(Descriptor descriptor)
     if (descriptor.getMappingForAttributeName("children").isOneToManyMapping())
       OneToManyMapping map = (OneToManyMapping) descriptor.
                              getMappingForAttributeName("children");
       DatabaseField objectID= (DatabaseField) map.getSourceKeyFields().get(0);
       DatabaseField ownerNo = (DatabaseField) map.getTargetForeignKeyFields().get(0);
       ExpressionBuilder builder = new ExpressionBuilder();
       Expression exp = builder.getField(ownerNo).getFunction("CHAR").
                        equal(builder.getField(objectID));
       map.setSelectionCriteria(exp);
   }This generates the following where clause:
... WHERE ((CHAR(t0.OwnerNo) = t0.ObjectID) ...
But, I still have two questions:
1. How do we get the right hand side of this comparison to reference the Parent part of the 1-M mapping?
2. Since character and numeric conversions are pretty standard SQL functions, is there something wrong with the DB2 database platform I'm using?

Mapping scenario with one customer and many invoices

Hi!
I am receiving a flat file with one customer and n-invoice records. The file could look like this:
133133222051241480320842420500089
13317350071000010806372131000                 0015890009876543X
13317350071000010806372131000                 0015890009876543X
13317350071000010806372131013                 0015890009876443X
13317350071000010806372131014                 0015890009872343X
where the first line is customer and the rest are invoices.
My question is: How can I get this into a structure like this:
<Customer>
<...>
<Invoice>
<...>
<Invoice>
<...>
When using content conversion (Customer,1,Invoice,*) there has to be specified a key field, which is not a possibility. Do I have to create a UDF for this to get the mapping I want?
Thanks for your answers!
regs Ole Mugaas

Thanks for your answers!
As I can see from the Krawcyk blog, he is only using one node and maybe that's why he don't have to use keyField. We have also come to the conclusion that we have to use keyfield, but then we have to give the fields out own values. This is not good enough since the values are predefined. Creating a "placeholder" in each data type would not be a good answer because then our customers have to send an additional field in the file which would cause a lot of work.
Do you know how this can be solved with the keyfield? Is it possible to create a keyField and give it a value that is already there, ex:
Invoice.keyFieldValue = Invoicenumber (where Invoicenumber is a field specified in the DT) ?
regards Ole

One to many mapping

Having trouble with the following poblem.. specially how to code getChildren??????? Help urgent
Create a class called Families which creates a one-to-many mapping of parent name (String) to Child objects. Create any needed member variables and write the two specified methods. (You do not need to write the Child class.)
class Families {
public void addToFamily( String parent, Child child) {
public List getChildren( String parent) {
I have done the following..
import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.List;
class Families {
private String parentName;
List <child> children = new ArrayList();
public Families(String name){
this.parentName = name;
public void addToFamily( String parent, child kid) {
Families f = new Families(parent);
f.children.add(kid);
public List<child> getChildren( String parent) {
return this.children;
}

Having trouble with the following poblem.. specially
how to code getChildren??????? Help urgent
Create a class called Families which creates a
one-to-many mapping of parent name (String) to Child
objects. Create any needed member variables and write
the two specified methods. This key:
(You do not need to write the Child class.)How can the following line possibly work?
List <child> children = new ArrayList();It's not syntactically correct, AND you're not writing the Child class.
%

Setting criteria on one-to-many mapping

Hello,
A quick question. Let's say you have two tables, TABLE A and TABLE B. TABLE A- which has a one to many relationship with TABLE B.
When I do a query to get an object from TABLE A, I also get back a collection of TABLE B objects. I'd like to be able to alway be able to restrict the TABLE B objects I get back by adding an additional criteria like "where TABLE_B.DRAFT = 'N'" so that I always only get back TABLE B objects that are not drafts. Is there anyway to add this to the DirectToField Mapping or anywhere else in the Toplink Project so that I don't have to specifically setup the query in my DAO code?
Thanks in advance for any help,
Mark

This is a follow-on to the previous question. I've been asked to create a domain object, Member, that would have two relationships with the child table Rec (Recommendations), a one-to-one mapping with the only record in the Rec table that has is "approved", and a one-to-many mapping with all the records for the Member. I realize from the answer received above that putting criteria in a mapping isn't recommended, but did want to see if it was even doable in case it was needed. Unfortunately, I get this error below:
"A non-read-only mapping must be defined for the sequence number field."
Below are my relevant mappings. Any thoughts on this?
Thanks,
Mark
OneToOneMapping approvedRecInfoMapping = new OneToOneMapping();
     approvedRecInfoMapping.setAttributeName("approvedRecInfo");
     approvedRecInfoMapping.setGetMethodName("getApprovedRecInfoHolder");
     approvedRecInfoMapping.setSetMethodName("setApprovedRecInfoHolder");
     approvedRecInfoMapping.setReferenceClass(domain.Rec.class);
     approvedRecInfoMapping.useBasicIndirection();
     approvedRecInfoMapping.readOnly();
     approvedRecInfoMapping.addForeignKeyFieldName("PROM_REC.PRM_ID", "PROM_REC_MEMBER.ID");
     approvedRecInfoMapping.setSelectionCriteria(new ExpressionBuilder().get("approved").equal("true"));
     descriptor.addMapping(approvedRecInfoMapping);
     OneToManyMapping publicRecsMapping = new OneToManyMapping();
     publicRecsMapping.setAttributeName("publicRecs");
     publicRecsMapping.setGetMethodName("getPublicRecs");
     publicRecsMapping.setSetMethodName("setPublicRecs");
     publicRecsMapping.setReferenceClass(domain.Rec.class);
     publicRecsMapping.useTransparentCollection();
     publicRecsMapping.readOnly();
     publicRecsMapping.useCollectionClass(oracle.toplink.indirection.IndirectList.class);
     publicRecsMapping.addTargetForeignKeyFieldName("REC.PRM_ID", "MEMBER.ID");
     descriptor.addMapping(publicRecsMapping);

How many Ipods can you use with one Itunes account?

How many iPods can you use/sync with one iTunes account?

PT wrote:
Macistotle wrote:
Unless you have DRM still haunting your tunes ... Then you can only use those songs on 5 devices. Otherwise, connect as many as you like (as stated above).
No, you can sync your DRM tracks to an unlimited number of iPods (but only authorized to play on 5 different computers/user accounts)
Patrick
So I can sync two iPods to my iTunes account and sync the same digital copy movies that come with some o' my DVDs to both ipods? Do movies make a difference really, DRM-Wise? Thanks in advance.

How many ipads can be synced with one itunes account, how many ipads can be synced with one itunes account

how many ipads can be synced with one itunes account?

http://gigaom.com/apple/itunes-101-multiple-devices-one-itunes-account/
 Cheers, Tom

How many apple tv can I connect with one account?

how many apple tv can I connect with one account?

there are 2 recent posts that suggest issues over 5, one where someone was trying to troubleshoot for a friend or client as they couldn't keep more than 5 connected, and the other where somone had more than 5 but was using 2 separate itunes libraries to share the load - not sure if that was with the same or differing AppleIDs.
I guess there is always the possibility that things kight vary from one itunes version to the next even unintentionally to allow more.
AC

On how many pc's may I install Lightroom with one license?

I'm planning to purchase Lightroom 5, but I need to know on how many pc's I can install the software when having a single license. Note that I will be the only user, but I do need it to work on both my desktop pc, as well as on my laptop.
How many pc's is the limit?

Yes the license is cross platform PC or Mac. Limit to two instalations with one in use at any point in time. No activate/deactivate Like other Photoshop applications you just monitor your own use you can uninstall from one computer and install on another as many times you need.

How many PCs can I use with one Creative Cloud subscription?

How many PCs can I use with one Creative Cloud subscription? For example I currently use Lightroom on a home PC with 2 large screens, but use a laptop or iPad when travelling. Does one monthly subscription cover all 3 or do I need 3 separate subscriptions ?

You are welcome!
P.S. when using the adobe forums, please mark helpful/correct responses of Staff or helper, if there are any.

With one package of Adobe Creative Suite 2 and the upgrade CS5 how many computers can use it?

With one package of Adobe Creative Suite 2 and the upgrade CS5 how many computers can use it?

You have 2 activations and no more.
Mylenium

How many computers can be upgraded with one 1 purchase mountain lion?

How many computers can be upgraded with one 1 purchase mountain lion?

What if I have a Mac with a different apple ID. Can I sign out of that ID and sign in with my other ID and still download it with one purchase?

How many downloads do you receive with one purchase of the Illustrator cs6?

How many different computers can you download the program with one purchase?

Ok, what illustrator should I purchase ( not monthly fee) to work on my imac osx 10.9.2 and my macbook pro osx 10.9.2
Thanks. Julian
Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone on the Verizon Wireless 4G LTE network.

MappingInfoNotFoundException with one-many mapping to horizontal PC subclass

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for