Mass updation of merchandise category in Billing doc. ------ ( IS-Retail
HI!
My problem is in regard to the Merchandise Category Reclassification in SAP IS-Retail.
My senario was that there were some Merchandise categories(MC) which were unallocated i.e they were not assigned to any Merchandise Cat. Heirarchy.
Also there was a Merchandise Category (90000001) MC_Common, which was a collection of articles that were not assigned to other MC, there were miscllanious.
But now, the above mentioned MC and articles in MC_Common have been assigned to their correct heirarchy or MC's.
What I want is, the old billing documents, which contained the articles with their old Merchandise Cat. no. gets changed such that the old merchandise cat. being displayed against the article reflects my new merchandise cat. assignment no. Without creating any new billing document.
How to go for it.
How billing doc can reflect, newly reclassified Merc. Cat.
Hi,
please get in contact with the SLO team.
System landscape Optimization, they have a tool to do such changes in mass.
Similar Messages
-
IS-Retail ---- Mass updation of merchandise category in old billing docs.
Please help me in this.
I have changed the merchandise category of some articles in Retail now I want to update this merchandise category in my old billing docs also.
Could any one can tell me how I will do the mass maintenace of old billing docs......Standard object for billing docs in Retail.
Thanks & Regards
Sunil GargHi,
please get in contact with the SLO team.
System landscape Optimization, they have a tool to do such changes in mass. -
Mass update of Item category in Sale order
Hi all,
Kindly guide me to do the mass updating of item category in a sale order.
I want to update the item category of all the items in a sale order.
User will be giving large number of sale orders as an input.
How to proceed to achieve the same?
Thanks in Advance,
Regards,
shajuHi,
We can write a function module for this by getting an input it want to change this..For eachinput we can activate this in a loop
Is they gave a file of inputs means we can go BDC or LSMW..If before transferring we want to make only little changes means we can do this by LSMW otherwise we can go for BDC... -
How to Create Merchandise Category Reference Article in IS-Retail system
Hi Experts,
Is there any separate Tcode to create Merchandise Category Reference articles in IS-RETAIL system.
Whether Merchandise Category reference article is created as normal article in MM41 only?
Whether we can assign any of the article that is created in that merchandise category as reference article in WG21 (or) is there any separate Tcode to create Reference articles.
During Retail Implementation projects, how Merchandise Category reference article are handled???
Any Input is highly appreciated.
Thanks and Regards,
Selvakumar.MHi,
With Tcode WG21 u can create MC ref. article. It is a way to create MC ref article. No need to use MM41.
Regards,
Rahul -
COPA : Drive Item Category from billing doc. / without sales order
Dear All ,
I need to drive item category directly from billing document ( billing without sales order - POS inbound doc. )
i tried to drive it from table VBRP but the derivation failed as table VBRP need the billing doc. number & i can't get it from COPA
POS does not create any sales order , the in coming inbound doc. create billing directly ( billing type : FP ).
Edited by: Ahmed Hassan on May 25, 2011 2:28 PMHi Jat
This is not the screen I am looking for .Please go to condition tab and look for Analysis .Let me know on what excess you are looking system to find your pricing .
Below are are reference for u.
Regards -
Anyone have any info on the above transaction code? Was told that we could do mass updates on the RFA date, billing milestones, applicant, etc by using it.
Hi,
Z ' T.codes develeped by ABAP's in your own system. We can't help this.
Take the Help from ABAP'rs,
Regards,
Kishore K -
Is there any table or report to see basic price billing doc wise in mass
Dear experts,
is there any table or report to see basic price billing doc wise, in mass, please help
regards
rajakarthikHi
If your basic price is same as Net price then you can check it in table VBRK.
If Basic Price is not same as Net Price then from the table VBRK you will have to take the value of KNUMV and then with respect to this KNUMV go to table KONV and take the value of KWERT.
To check the value in mass you may make a report with the help of ABAP or by your own using SQVI transaction.
Regards
Amitesh Anand -
Table relationship between hierarchy level and merchandise category
1) Want to find Merchadise Category from Merchandise Hierarchy level which is attached with same Merchandise category.
I am having data/TABLE as below.
my input: M_WWG1C_class
i want to fetch data matkl in T023 or matkl in MARA for the same article within same merchandise category.
How i can have link?
2) i am having input CAWN_atwrt(Characteristic Value) and how i can reach matkl in T023 or matkl in MARA for the same article within same merchandise category.Oracle does not support REPEATABLE READ transaction isolation level. It only supports SERIALIZABLE, READ COMMITED and READ ONLY isolation levels.
The default is READ COMMITED.
While the READ COMMITED can access all the committed data till the point of execution in transaction, READ SERIALIZABLE can access committed data till the point of start of transaction.
Another difference between two with respect to ROW LEVEL LOCKING is
Both read committed and serializable transactions use row-level locking, and both will wait if they try to change a row updated by an uncommitted concurrent transaction. The second transaction that tries to update a given row waits for the other transaction to commit or roll back and release its lock. If that other transaction rolls back, the waiting transaction, regardless of its isolation mode, can proceed to change the previously locked row as if the other transaction had not existed.
However, if the other blocking transaction commits and releases its locks, a read committed transaction proceeds with its intended update. A serializable transaction, however, fails with the error "Cannot serialize access", because the other transaction has committed a change that was made since the serializable transaction began.
Read following for clearing your concepts on transaction isolation levels and locking mechanisms
http://otn.oracle.com/docs/products/oracle9i/doc_library/release2/server.920/a96524/c21cnsis.htm#2414
Chandar -
Difference in Billing doc value & MCSI report
Hi Gurus,
What could be the difference in value between the billing value & the MCSI report?
Regards,
KumarHello,
MCSI is based on infostructure and updated on the execution of transaction.If at the time of creation of billing document ,you have not configure the billing doc type,item category and not assign the proper update group to them then MCSI will not be updated and later on you will find the difference in MCSI nad total billing value.
Sunil -
Billing Comparison on quantities when two or more time slice in bill doc.
I our project for commercial customer consumption history of past six years is normalized to create a monthly consumption base line (calendar months) this base line is maintained as installation fact and while billing execution this is used to calculate billing base line
E.g
Jan consumption base line u2013 100000 KWH
Feb Consumption base line u2013 90000 KWH
Billing period is 15 Jan u2013 15 Feb
Billing base line is calculated by prorating Jan and Feb consumption base line
((100000/31) X 17 ) + (( 90000/28) X 15) = 103053
Periodic consumption is compared with billing base line and if
A. Consumption is more than billing base line
Excess consumption is billed to produce debit $ amount in bill doc
E.g Billing base line 103053, Periodic consumption 110000
Excess consumption = 110000 u2013 103053 = 6947 KWH
6947 X price = Debit $ amount
B. Consumption is less than billing base line
Difference between billing base line and consumption is billed to produce credit $ amount in bill doc
E.g Billing base line 103053, Periodic consumption 90000
Difference = 103053 - 90000 = 13053 KWH
13053 X ( -Price) = Credit $ amount
Comparison between Billing base line and Consumption is done using standard variant IF01
The problem occurs when bill document has two or more time slice due to price change or change in facts like factor at rate category facts. If for one time slice consumption is more than billing base line and for other time slice consumption is less than billing base line.
Variant IF01 does not take into account time slice but it compares quantities considering whole billing period.
E.G Billing period is 25 Jan u2013 25 Feb
Price changes on 20 Feb
Billing base line 25 Jan to 19 Feb u2013 50000
20 Feb to 25 Feb u2013 20000
Billing base line for complete billing period 50000 + 20000 = 70000
Consumption (prorated by SAP) 25 Jan to 19 Feb u2013 56000
20 Feb to 25 Feb u2013 18000
Total consumption for billing period 56000 + 18000 = 74000
Consumption is more than billing base line for 25 Jan to 19 Feb time period and consumption is less than billing base line for 20 Feb to 25 Feb time period but since for complete billing period consumption (74000)is more than billing base line (70000) and this comparison is done by IF01. Control in schema flows to rate which calculate the Debit $ amount for both the time slice which results incorrect calculation of bill amount
Has anybody encountered similar scenario before. Is there a way out so that individual comparison is carried out for each time slice to pass control to correct rate in schema.
Thanks
AmitHi,
You can use variant quanti02 to determine the difference between the periodic consumption and base consuption.
first, you calculate the positive difference only ( periodic consumption - base period) by selecting variant control 2 - Negative differences are not updated. You store this into a new QUANT operand called QPLUSDIFF
then you do the same quanti02 to determine the negative difference, but first you detemine it as positive difference between base consumption and periodic consumption) and multiply the result with factor -1 with quanti09 and store it into a new QUANT operand called QNEGDIFF
Then you have your negative and positive differences and you can bill them with the corresponding prices in subsequent steps.
Hope this helps,
Daniel Toba
http://www.sap-isu.net -
Hi All,
In case of billing document cancellation (VF11) the cancelled doc. is not getting automatically cleared against the actual billing doc. no. Each time user has to clear the doc. manually. We have observed this issue after recent patch updation dated 22nd Feb’2014. Till 21st Feb’2014 the cancelled doc. has been cleared automatically against their respective billing documents.
Please guide.
Thank you.Hi Gopi,
Please chheck SAP Note No. 1259505. It explains two ways in which SAP releases cancellation documents to FI.
OSS NOte 1259505 lists the possible causes from SD side &
OSS Note 309208 lists the possible causes from FI side.
Regards,
Kavita -
Dear all,
Scenario is user has created sales order for excisable finished goods ,and followed by delivery, billing and excise billing to the customer who has already received the materials (GR done).
Now by mistake instead of cancelling the some other billing doc. user has cancelled above billing doc.
How we can update this . Do we have to create new billing doc?. but excise billing doc has already gone to customer what is effect of the same in terms of excise /register
kindly suggest
thanks,
shankarHi,
if u delete also that means it's not deleted total from the data base as ur abaper to retrieve the data from the data base table he will do it for u .
best regards,
venkataswamy. -
Dear Friends,
We are facing a major issue which is as follows:
A bill doc was cancelled. The doc flow of the original billing doc shows:
Delivery (Archived)-> Sale Invoice (Completed)-> A/cing doc (Not Cleared)
The cancelled doc is not coming in the above doc flow. What can be the reason that cancelled doc is not coming in the doc flow?
On the other hand the doc flow of the Cancelled doc shows:
Delivery (Same as above) (Status Archived)->Cancel Inv (S1) Status- Missing export data. (Transaction is domestic). Here also the original bill doc is not coming in the doc flow of S1. However the original doc is coming in the Assignment field in the header of S1. Again what can be the reason? We also want to clear the A/cing doc of the original Billing document. How is this possible?
Is there any T.Code for displaying J1ID?
Plz hep to solve these issues.
Thank you very much.Go to VA03, key in the sale order reference and check the document flow. Let me know whether you could see the original billing document that was cancelled. If not, check in copy control whether you have ticked the box "Update document flow".
Is there any T.Code for displaying J1ID?
What do you mean by this ?? J1ID itself is a standard TCode.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi -
Billing doc error due t copa standard quantity
Hi I am facing an issue .this is regarding the error while releaseing a billing doc the errortranslating the quantity to the COPA standard quatity.
in material master i checked the unit of measure is SET and in copa KEA6 VVAUM( Alt Uom)
Error translating the quantity to the CO-PA standard quantity
Message no. K/832
Diagnosis
Customizing in Profitability Analysis CO-PA allows a standard quantity field to be updated.
An error has occurred in the present document while the standard quantity field "VVAUM" was being supplied.
The base unit of measure "SET" could not be translated into the standard unit of measure "M3" for the material "B/CAL/PROJECT5".
System Response
It is not possible to process the document again.
Procedure
1. If required, maintain the unit of measure "M3" as an alternative unit of measure in the material master for the material "B/CAL/PROJECT5".
2. In certain cases, you should check whether derivation of the unit of measure for the CO-PA standard quantity field "VVAUM" needs to be changed in Customizing for CO-PA characteristic derivation
This is billing docments needs to be released . what is the problem some body can help me to resolve the issue
ArjunHi
I am assuming that you want to update qty in COPA with UoM M3
In MM02 - Maintain conversion of SET to M3
In KE4MS - Maintain M3 as the Standard Unit of Measure
In KE4M - Assign SD Qty field (FKIMG) to VVAUM
BR,Ajay M -
Hi guys,
I was trying to create billing doc for a delivery XXX.
It was showing me error log as XXX THE DOCUMENT IS NOT RELEVANT FOR BILLING.
If any one know why this error is pls explain.
thank you
with regards
chaitanyaBasically the item categories that are in play on the order and subsequent delivery are set as not billing relevant in configuration. Therefore the system will not create a billing document for them. Review the item categories used and either change to an item category that is billing relevant or change the settings on the item category specified to make it billing relevant.
Maybe you are looking for
-
Skype screen sharing not working with skype premiu...
Hi, I just signed up for the skype premium trial. I got the group video working fine however the screen share option was not available? Any ideas?
-
I know, I know Murray, you said these don't work in the past, however, I made a template with a pop up / drop down (however you like to call it) menu and so far it seems to work just fine. Am I delusional ? Headed for a huge fall later on when I disc
-
Hello, Iam a new by in Flex and I try to use develop an application on a modular way. I am using the resource bundle because my application must be multi language (2 languages). I have a ApplicationControlBar where I can change the language of my app
-
제품 : AOL 작성날짜 : 2005-11-28 MERGED PATCH적용시 ORA-00942 발생 ============================ PURPOSE HR 이나 CRM patch적용시 Merge patch기능을 사용하는데 이대 ORA-00942 table or view does not exist 가 발생하는 경우가 있습니다. 이에 대한 Solution을 제공하고자 합니다. Problem Description HR.K patch적
-
Micro SD not detected in Z1.... What is going on
Afternoon All, First time poster here, hoping someone can help resolve my issue before I go completely crazy with my Z1 and put the thing in the bin or through an industrial shredder Got new 64gb micro sd card last week, formatted before putting in m