Material Ledger -- WIP values

Hi,
We have material ledger functionality active and want to extract the WIP values based on the Production Order. Currently we are executing transaction Code CKMLWIPDISP for viewing the WIP details and the values in object currency and controlling area currency are appearing. We want to know the table which provides the above details
Can anybody suggest the table which will provide us the WIP values based on the Production corder incase if the material ledger active.
Regards,
Shree.
Edited by: Shree Ja on Nov 18, 2010 10:19 AM

Hello Shree,
Some more tables
CKMLCRWIP                      Material Ledger: WIP Period Records (Values)
CKMLLACRWIP                    ML Activity Types: Period/ Currency Records WIP
CKMLLAPPWIP                    Ml Activity Types: Period Records WIP (Quantitie
CKMLMV004WIP                   Process Model: Deductions WIP
CKMLPPWIP                      Material-Ledger: Period Records WIP (Quantities)
CKMLWIPCUST                    Customizing: WIP To Actual
As told earlier I'm not in a position to verify since there are no records in the current system.
Kind Regards // Shaubhik

Similar Messages

Material Ledger WIP Revaluation OBYC

Hi
Can anyone please give example or documentations regarding OBYC for transaction key WPM (WIP from Price Differences ) and PRM (Price Difference from Exploded WIP) ?
And what the accounting journal would be like for those 2 transactions?
Thanks

Hi,
There are two new transaction keys for Differences From Reduced WIP:
WPM     WIP from Price Differences (Material)
WPA     WIP from Price Differences (Int. Acty)
During the WIp Revaluation:
To build-up of new WIP (material):
PRY   PRV   KDM   KDV   -> WPM
To Build-up of new WIP (activity/business process):
     GBB(AUI)                    -> WPA
The Reduction of WIP and the rollup of the differences to the product are posted in two steps:
Step 1: WPM/A -> PRM/A:     The values are based on step WIP Revaluation
Step 2: PRM/A u2013> PRV/KDV: The values are based on step multi level price determination
The PRM and PRA are:
PRM for Materials Differences of cancelled WIP (Materials)
PRA for Activity Types Differences of cancelled WIP (Activities)
I hope this clarifies a bit,
Regards,
MLM

Actual Costing / Material Ledger - Component values transfer after movement

I executed a production order with several cost components, as Labor, Machine HS, after the settlement of the production order this cost where allocated into de CKM3N components. In addition to this, I executed movement 412 Q (Plant Stock to WBS Stock) for the material and the component values didnt pass to the material / PEP. I executed CKMLCP to Multilevel price determination. Can anyone help me with this?
The original material kept the cost split values, but the Material / Pep didnt. (the material code and plant didn't change)
Regards

Hi ,
Welcome to SDN ..
Its not a ML issue , but its a MM issue..
Movement 412Q is a transfer from plant stock to project stock. The material quantity gets reduced from plant stock and increased on project stock. The material value stays on the inventory account (so you won't see any actual costs associated with this transaction). ..
After you do a 412Q you can to a 221Q to issue the material from your project stock to the WBS. This will reduce the quantity in your project stock segment. The material value is credited to inventory and debited to material consumption expense(actual cost on the WBS).
The above applies to valuated project stock only. An issue to non-valuated project stock is treated like an inventory transfer from the logistics point of view(quantity is moved from plant stock to project stock) but like a consumption from a financial point of view(reduce inventory, increase expense).
Since, your Project Stock is not consumed.. CKM3N is not reflecting any consumption. Please use the movement type 221Q and i am sure your issue will be solved..
Please revert back for any further clarifications
Regards
Sarada

Material Ledger Closing

Dear Gurus,
While material ledger closing using CMKLCP,i need clarification for the following process.
1. Single/level
2. Multilevel.
3. Revaluation of Consumption
4. WIP Calculation
5.Post closing
6. Price update.
can anyone explain about the above process outcome, what is the difference between material ledger WIP Calculation and Production order WIP Calculation.
While price update for price control material S, we need to re run cost estimate or it will update the new prices.
Appriciated for valuable inputs.
Ramesh.

Hi Ramesh .
Hope you understand clearly the purpose of standard costing and why we use Material Ledger .
Standard Costing is based on a pre-determined /derived prices for a period/year and all costs are caputed on the basis of the standard Cost . Goods Issues/Receipt , consumption all are at standard cost.
COGS GL Account is at standard and all the inventories are at standard ..
Difference between standard and actual costs are captured as variances in different GL Account . Mainly we have two variances... price variances ( at the time of purchases ) and usage variances at the time of production ..
Material Ledger is a seperate module.. where it calculates the actual costs . Variances are rolled back to the consumption accounts ( which is at standard ) to derive the actual cost . Actual Cost = Standard Cost + Variances .
1. Now Finished Material is made of Raw Material and Semi-Finished Goods . ...When we calculate the actual costs of finished product .. we can find out the actual costs of raw materials and semi-finished goods. ML will find out the actual cost of raw material , semi-finished goods and finished goods. This concept is know as multi-level determination ... In Single level.. only one level of material cost is computed as actual.. not rolled back to the lowest level.
2. Revaluation of consumption during ML run means .. the COGS ( which was at standard earlier) is now being revaluted and becomes actual..
3. WIP Calculation calculates the WIP costs on actual.
4. Post Closing Step will put the new GL entries.. where variances will be nullified and COGS and inventory will become actual.
5. Price Update is optional.. you can make the actual costs computed as standard cost for the next month..
Production Order WIp Calculation = Actual Qty X Standard Rate
ML WIP Calculation = Actual Qty x Actual Rate
Please revert back for any further clarifications
Regards
Sarada

Reg: Material Ledger Account posting

Hello Everyone,
We have Material Ledger active for a plant with transaction based price determination (Price Control V). I have posted a GR & its creating 2 Accounting docs. One with Transaction keys BSX, WRX & PRD.
WRX is calculating correctly based on the PO price. But, I am not sure how BSX is calculated as its not picking the Periodic Price unit in the current period.
Could you please guide how account posing (GR & IR) will happen for a material with Price control V & Material Ledger active.
Thanks in Advance,
Uswin

Hi Uswin,
if you look at the second FI document generated upon the GR, I'm pretty sure you will find that in this document, the price difference from the first document ist "reversed" and the amount added to inventory value, correct? So the end result is the same as it would be without material ledger (GR valued at PO price), it just happens in two steps. Therefore, what Frederick said is not 100% correct, as only the end result is the same with and without ML for V/2 materials, but not each single document.
Secondly, as to why the PRD arises on GR.
In my system I found the same case. A GR with a PRD posting for a material with price control V and price determination 2.
In my case I found the PRD to be in fact a rounding difference, which arose in the following way:
Price in PO was 57,78 u20AC/10 pieces. The price unit in material master, however, is 1 unit.
Now what the system seems to have done is:
(1) round the price in PO to the price unit from material master: result: 5,78 u20AC/piece
(2) Post 5,78 u20AC * pieces received to stock value, the difference (5,778 - 5,78)*pieces received to PRD account
(3) POst a second document reversing the PRD and addig it to stock value
Perhaps, the reason for a "price difference" arising is similar in your case
Regards
Nikolas

Setting Material Ledger to Productive

All,
How do I set the material ledger to productive for a given plant ?
The accounts are all setup and everything is fine in transaction OMX1
(the active material ledger is checked for the plant\valuation area)
However in transaction CKM9 the material ledger is not yet productive.
How do I make it productive ?
Thanks,
Mark

Dear Mark,
After installing the Material Ledger it is necessary to run a transaction to define the Material Ledger as productive for a valuation area.
Note: Once defined as productive, the material ledger cannot be deactivated. This procedure must be executed only when there are no material movements for the period. Also, if there are material master data for production related materials (material types ROH, HALB and FERT) already in the system they must have a standard price registered .
Prerequisites:
To install the Material Ledger/WIP functions is also necessary that the extension EA-FIN (Financials Extension) has been activated. To check if this extension is active use the following path: IMG > SAP Customizing Implementation Guide > Activation Switch for SAP R/3 Enterprise Extension Set
1. Access the activity using one of the following navigation options:
Installation Role J18 Product Cost Planning / Material Ledger -> Material Ledger Installation -> Repeat Steps for each Productive Plant -> Production Startup of Material Ledger
or Transaction CKMSTART
2. Run the transaction CKMSTART for all valuation areas.
Reward points if it helps.
Regards,
Naveen.

WIP Cumulative value(Material Ledger)

Hi,
We have executed the material ledger acutal cost WIP Transaction Code -- COMLWIPDISP. This t.code is reflecting the WIP Cumulative value which is inclusion of WIP Price difference. Cany anybody let me know how this value is calculating and in which t.code. In which table or function module we can see the WIP price difference value and cumulative value.
Regards,
Shree J

Hi SJ,
The below example will help you to understand your query:
SFG product standard cost is 90 ( as per the BOM materials).
Production/Process order is created, released and Raw material are issued to this Production/Process order. The status of this Order is not yet changed to TECO/CNF due to there are still some more operations has to be carriedout. So assume at this stage total cost is 100.
When you run your month activities like WIP/Variance/Settlement Calculation and also CKMLCP (Actual Costing Run).
After the month end activities, if you execute COMLWIPDISP, system will display Cummulative WIP value as 100 and difference 10.
Thanks and Regards,
ADI

Material Ledger Value Flow Monitor CKMVFM question

Hello,
I am researching the Value Flow Monitor report CKMVFM. On my test material, it is showing a balance in FI, and a red indicator on the FI/ML status. I assume this means there is a discrepancy between FI and Material Ledger, but I don't know how to go about researching this. I have completed all steps in the Closing Cockpit. How do I explain the difference between FI and ML, or go about reconciling the two? Thanks in advance for your assistance!

Please Refer OSS : Note 744090 - Value Flow Monitor: Explanation and recommendations

Revaluating COPA COGS with Material Ledger values (KE27-B0 curr type)

While attempting to use transaction KE27 to revaluate COPA with material ledger's cost component structure, we are getting an error for the B0 (Operating Concern Currency) records. The error (KE 435) states that "Costing Key ML1 does not exist". I have defined this costing key and it appears to be working for the Company Code (curr type 10) currency records. Does anyone have any idea why I am unable to restate the Operating Concern Currency records?

Hi Thomas,
The system posts the difference between the original values of the line
item and the new values in a new, separate line item, but in the same
value fields. To avoid the error message KE435 you have to define for
the costing key a value field for actual costs for your operating
concern in customizing :
Profitability Analysis -> Master Data -> Valuation ->
Set Up Valuation Using Material Cost Estimate ->
Define Access to Actual Costing/Material Ledger ->
Costing Key for actual Cost Estimate ->
Val.Fld Allocatn for Periodic Moving Average Price (total cost)
That is necessary even though you defined already value fields in
Cost component structure (cost component split) in customizing :
Profitability Analysis -> Master Data -> Valuation ->
Assign Value Fields (transaction KE4R)
The program expects both entries, one for cost component total cost
and several for cost component split. If there is a cost component
split defined for material the valuation will distribute the share of
costs to the value fields according the definition.
Only for material without a cost component split the program will
assign the costs to the value field for total costs.
Regards,
Abhisek

WIP costing procedure and Material ledger

Dear all,
we are using 4.7 release and it has been asked to implement WIP in our company.
I would like to have some information regarding the activation of WIP in production orders for product costing and the impacts on Material Ledger.
Thanks in advance
Andrea

Dear all,
we are using 4.7 release and it has been asked to implement WIP in our company.
I would like to have some information regarding the activation of WIP in production orders for product costing and the impacts on Material Ledger.
Thanks in advance
Andrea

Actual Costing/Material Ledger (CO-PC-ACT) - Actual costing

Hello,
I have same problem with actual costing in material Ledger.
When I perform the actual costing a price differences that belongs to materials (orders) which at the end of the period are WIP, remain not split and don not book them on Accruals and defer.acct(material ledger) (OBYC - Transaction LKW).
Moreover, in the following month, system does not taking into account the value.
Does anybody had similar problem or knew how tu handle it?
Thanks in advance,
Rafal

Hi Rafal,
there is a functionality built into acual costing to cover this:
[WIP Revaluation |http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/9e/9e7a74681f1d4f9ba6f5d64aba4a44/frameset.htm]
best regards,
Udo

Material ledger is not active in valuation area C002

Dear All,
I have a Scheduling Agreement for a material 'A' with Vendor 'V' with diff prices with validity dates, I did the GR & when i am posting the invoice thro' miro, system is throwing error as above Material ledger is not active in valuation area C002 Why should I activate the material ledger here ? Pls suggest how can i solve this ?
regds,
Kallu

Hi
For a Particular material, Material Ledger is active or not? Can be checked in Accountig view of Material Master.
Why we need Material Ledger?
A fundamental task of the material ledger is carrying inventories in multiple currencies and/or
valuations.
Material inventory values are normally carried by the SAP system in one currency. The material
ledger component enables the R/3 System to carry inventory values in two additional
currencies/valuations. Therefore, all goods movements in the material ledger are performed in up
to 3 currencies or valuations. Currency amounts are translated into foreign currencies at
historical exchange rates directly at the time of posting. Businesses such as those in highinflation
countries can therefore carry their inventories in a more stable currency (such as US
dollars). This reveals inflationary effects on inventory values.
If you use transfer prices to represent value flows in your company in different
valuation views, you must use the material ledger. This allows you to carry your
inventories in three different valuations (legal valuation, valuation for reporting
purposes, and profit center valuation).
Before activating the material ledger, make sure you know which currencies and valuations
you want to use, because you cannot go back and change the setting.
Activating the material ledger is a prerequisite for using multiple valuations.
Thanks
Raman

Material Ledger - confirmation in different months

Hi Gurus,
I have a problem as follows:
We are using material ledger for actual costing. When we post partial confirmation for a production order in period t, goods receipt and goods issue is posted for period t. However, in some cases, confirmation is posted although one material has not arrived at the factory yet and that material is not assembled on the finished product in period t, but it is assembled in period t+1. In this case, when we close material ledger, we receive an error as "there are nondistributed rows" in transaction CKM3. How can I solve this problem either in logistics side or financial side?
Thanks and cheers,
Fatih Zenginer

Hi Faith,
Are you familiar with transaction CKMVFM - Value Flow Monitor? You can analyze Not Distributed differences with this transaction. The price limiter is the key.
Thanks,
Greg

Material ledger Tables

Dear All,
Issue: Not able to post Good receipt due to the error that material does not exit.
Background: we have activated user exit in material master for material type ZROH and assigned a internal number range to it in MMNR. this user exit will append the material group mentioned during master creation in the internal code generated by system.
example PPMM is the material group and the internal code generated by system is 122222 so when we save the material in mm01 our material code is PPMM122222.
we are trying to do GR by 501 and now the material ledger function module is truncating PPMM from the material code and its trying to post document with 1222222. which then goes into error that material does not exist.
Analysis: I have checked in the MARA/MARC the material code is PPMM1222222. but i guess in some table whcih is relevant for material ledger system has stored internal material number 1222222.
So I am looking for tables or solution for this isssue

Hi Expert,
Please refer the SAP Standard Material Ledger Tables:
The following tables contain data that can appear in the material ledger documents:
Table - MLHD - Material Ledger Document: Header
Table - MLIT- Material Ledger Document: Items
Table - MLPP - Material Ledger Document: Posting Periods and Quantities
Table - MLPPF - Material Ledger Document: Field Groups (Posting Periods and Quantities)
Table - MLCR - Material Ledger Document: Currencies and Values
Table - MLCRF - Material Ledger Document: Field Groups (Currencies and Values)
Table - MLCRP - Material Ledger Document: Price Change (Currencies, Prices)
Table - MLMST - Material Ledger Document: Costing Run Header Data
Regards,
GK
SAP

Assign direct material cost to value field in copa while issue to Prod orde

Dear All,
My requirement is like this:
There are some 16 material groups from A to P each containing some materials(finished goods).
I want to allocate overhead to different material groups(Charecteristic in copa) in COPA using the periodic assesment cycles. I am able to allocate overhead(admin & sales cost) to different value fields in copa from different cost centers.
I want to analyse the product cost and also the profitability of each material group in COPA using Report painter. Iam able to pull all the costs which i assign to value fields using assessment. But, i am NOT able to get the direct material cost which is issued to production orders using BOM.
My question is whether we can assign the direct material cost to any user defined value field(material cost value field) while the material is being issued to production orders. Is there any automated way where we can directly assign the direct material cost to value field in copa while issuing the material to Production orders.
Pls explain me whether we can do it. if yes how?
Thank you very much in advance.
Regards,
Vishnu
VST-IT.

PA is a Profitability analysis tool. That means it gets updated when a sale is made, not before. (Except for settlements and assessment of overheads.)
Goods issues for production gets updated in CO-PC, and needs to be analysed there. If you don't, you loose all the inbuilt tools for variance analysis, cost estimate comparisons, Wip Calculation etc. To the best of my knowledge, a Profitability Segment cannot be used as a cost object in Production Planning, because amongst others, you need to be able to capitalise the produced materials to stock at the end of the production run, or to WIP at the end of the Financial period,which is not possible with PS.
Similarly, overheads are recorded in CCA and needs to be analysed there.
If one goes against these big groupings in SAP, you always run into problems.

Material Ledger -- WIP values

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for