Max-beans-in-cache, transactions and passivation

WLS 6.1 sp4
database concurrency, oracle
I compute max-beans-in-cache as:
(max # fetched in a transaction) * (number of worker threads)
therefore if I think that a table with have at most 500 rows and the
server is configured with 20 worker threads I have 500 * 20 = 10000 as
my max-beans-in-cache.
In my test the table has 7 rows. In our load test I see the Beans In
Use Count go up to 9999 instances and then start passivation.
I have two questions:
1) What does 'Beans In Use Count' really mean
2) why is weblogic using much more memory than it should to store 7 unique entities?
thanks

See my comments below.
S
Chad Urso McDaniel <[email protected]> wrote:
>
I understand this, but WebLogic should either reuse objects in the
cache/pool or not cache them at all. There are cases where the objects in the cahce are used. For e.g. with entity
beans and Read-Only concurrancy, when cache-between-tx is set. However I noticed
this behavior for other cases too and therefore the caching is not all that intellegent.
Also the beans in the pool are reused.
The current situation results in
objects being allocated, referenced by the cache so they will never be
garbage collected, but the objects are never used again once their
transaction completes. This is very, very wasteful with memory.
In some cases as mentioned above.
S
"Sri" <[email protected]> writes:
Hi,
The reason for having so many entries is due to fact that there isno way WLS
would know there are only 7 rows in the db everytime an entity beanis created/modified/accessed.
For e.g., if you run a test where you do 'findAll' the first run wouldhave 7
beans and the next most likely (There is another parameter that youcould use
to control number of beans in the cache, idle-timeout-seconds. Thoughits not
clear from the doc how the entity beans are handled wrt this parameter,it might
passivate entity beans if this timeout occurs) 14 and so on. If thisis a overhead
for your system then reduce this number.
S
container start removing beans before Chad Urso McDaniel <[email protected]>
wrote:
WLS 6.1 sp4
database concurrency, oracle
I compute max-beans-in-cache as:
(max # fetched in a transaction) * (number of worker threads)
therefore if I think that a table with have at most 500 rows and the
server is configured with 20 worker threads I have 500 * 20 = 10000as
my max-beans-in-cache.
In my test the table has 7 rows. In our load test I see the BeansIn
Use Count go up to 9999 instances and then start passivation.
I have two questions:
1) What does 'Beans In Use Count' really mean
2) why is weblogic using much more memory than it should to store7 unique
entities?
thanks

Similar Messages

  • Max-beans-in-cache ==== Error

    Hi all,
    I have a entity bean with max-beans-in-cache=5000 and one of the findByXXX fetches
    more than that and the application stops with an exception. Is there anyway or
    a strategy to follow when cases like this where the records of find exceeds the
    max limit. This is a huge data process application and we tried to do maximum
    filters to reduce the records to minimal.
    Please help me with your thoughts or ideas to .. how to avoid or is there any
    deployment time argument .. etc
    using WL 7.0
    Thanks
    -arun

    If you just invoke the finder, then the container should not complain
    about bringing back > max-beans-in-cache elements. However if you try
    to enlist > max-beans-in-cache beans in a transaction, it will throw a
    CacheFull.
    One way to avoid this is to limit your maxRows returned by the finder.
    This can be done in the CMP descriptor.
    -- Rob
    Arun nair wrote:
    Hi all,
    I have a entity bean with max-beans-in-cache=5000 and one of the findByXXX fetches
    more than that and the application stops with an exception. Is there anyway or
    a strategy to follow when cases like this where the records of find exceeds the
    max limit. This is a huge data process application and we tried to do maximum
    filters to reduce the records to minimal.
    Please help me with your thoughts or ideas to .. how to avoid or is there any
    deployment time argument .. etc
    using WL 7.0
    Thanks
    -arun

  • Max-beans-in-cache and getting mail

    Hi,
    Here is the situation. I am currently using the
    max-beans-in-cache option in the stateful-session-cache . What I want to do is when the max bean amount has been reached and the bean is removed. At this point I would like to have an email or some kind of notification that this happened.
    Does anybody have any idea how to do this?
    thanks,
    Marc

    Hi,
    Here is the situation. I am currently using the
    max-beans-in-cache option in the stateful-session-cache . What I want to do is when the max bean amount has been reached and the bean is removed. At this point I would like to have an email or some kind of notification that this happened.
    Does anybody have any idea how to do this?
    thanks,
    Marc

  • CMP cache limits and passivation

    Good day,
    We are hitting issues around filling up the EJB cache but we also want
    to limit the memory impact of the deployment. What I mean is that if
    you have max-beans-in-cache set to 50 and you involve more than 50 EB in
    a txn, it throws a cache full exception. We can bump up the cache size,
    but for an unbounded collection, this is an artificial fix, another txn
    may load more than the new size.
    I read in an old posting that the EJB team was looking at passivating EB
    involved in a txn to avoid this issue. Was this incorporated into the
    engine and if so, how is it controlled?
    Thanks,
    Sean

    Sean Garagan wrote:
    Hi Rob,
    Thanks for the response.
    The only issue about not using an unbounded collection is that entity
    beans and finder methods are defined as unbounded collections. If you
    use the WLS example of the bands (or the EJB spec of orders and items)
    all of the collections are unbounded. Without using WLS specific tags,
    there does not seem to be a way to limit the returned values to allow an
    EB to batch operations in smaller chunks to alleviate the problem.Indeed. The max-elements tag is in our descriptors to limit the number
    of rows returned from the database. It would be nice to see this
    standardized.
    -- Rob
    >
    I guess it comes down to another hole in the spec (hopefully one that
    will be patched).
    Sean
    Rob Woollen wrote:
    No, passivation during transactions is on the feature plan for a
    future release.
    That being said, an unbounded collection is probabbly not a great idea
    regardless. you don't want to bring back a huge amount of data from
    the database, and you don't want us to have to passivate your working
    set out of memory.
    -- Rob
    Sean Garagan wrote:
    Good day,
    We are hitting issues around filling up the EJB cache but we also
    want to limit the memory impact of the deployment. What I mean is
    that if you have max-beans-in-cache set to 50 and you involve more
    than 50 EB in a txn, it throws a cache full exception. We can bump
    up the cache size, but for an unbounded collection, this is an
    artificial fix, another txn may load more than the new size.
    I read in an old posting that the EJB team was looking at passivating
    EB involved in a txn to avoid this issue. Was this incorporated into
    the engine and if so, how is it controlled?
    Thanks,
    Sean

  • Max Beans in Cache causes NULL Pointer Exception

    Hi All,
    a rather weird event (from our perspective) occurs when we do the
    following:
    We have an entity bean set to max beans in cache 100 (default value of
    our deployment tool ), the database table related to that bean holds
    lets say 300 entries.
    Doing a find all and in the same session bean instanciated transaction a
    processing loop over the enumeration of beans we get an NULL Pointer
    exception when accesing the 101 Bean. Neverthless the Weblogic server
    increases the cache size automatically but obviously not fast enough and
    not on time.
    has anyone experienced the same problem and has a fix for it, appart
    from increasing the cache size in the deployment descriptor ?
    any help welcome
    Michael

    Hi Michael.
    Can you post the stack trace of the NullPointerException? Was it in
    your code or ours? Also, what version of WebLogic are you using?
    -- Rob
    Rob Woollen
    Software Engineer
    BEA WebLogic
    [email protected]
    Michael Rupprecht wrote:
    Hi All,
    a rather weird event (from our perspective) occurs when we do the
    following:
    We have an entity bean set to max beans in cache 100 (default value of
    our deployment tool ), the database table related to that bean holds
    lets say 300 entries.
    Doing a find all and in the same session bean instanciated transaction a
    processing loop over the enumeration of beans we get an NULL Pointer
    exception when accesing the 101 Bean. Neverthless the Weblogic server
    increases the cache size automatically but obviously not fast enough and
    not on time.
    has anyone experienced the same problem and has a fix for it, appart
    from increasing the cache size in the deployment descriptor ?
    any help welcome
    Michael

  • Max beans in cache

    Hi ,
    I have the following parameter set in weblogic-ejb-jar.xml for a statefulsession bean.
    ==================================================
    stateful-session-cache>
    <max-beans-in-cache>2</max-beans-in-cache>
    <idle-timeout-seconds>600</idle-timeout-seconds>
    </stateful-session-cache>
    ==================================================
    I then create more than 2 requests(approx 10) to the stateful session bean for which the above parameter is set.
    In EJB-MONITORING-Stateful Ejbs I have the following fields set from the customize view:
    Activation Count
    Passivation Count
    Cache Access Count
    Cache Miss Count
    Cached Beans Current Count
    EJB Name
    My understanding is that no more than 2 beans should appear in the Cached Beans Current Count.If the request is sent from more than 2 browsers invoking the stateful bean I should get Invocation Target exception.
    But upon sending requests from more than 2 browsers invoking the same session bean I see that :
    count of Cached Beans Current Count = number of browsers/clients from where the request is coming.
    There is no exception.
    Kindly clarify my understanding.
    Thanks

    Hi,
    if you give some number in <max-beans-in-cache>number</max-beans-in-cache>.Then Weblogic Server going to create that many number of objects initially .
    In case of statefull SessionBeans, If you give 3 ,Then Server creates 3 objects for that bean to provide service to the 3 clients at a time .
    Whenever it receives the 4 requests at a time then three request's will be served at a time and 4th request will wait until the server passivate any object out of 3 in some persistant storage and create the object for 4th client.
    it will not throw any exception or error if we sent more than number of requests which we were mention in max-beans-in-cache.
    ----Anilkumar kari

  • Max-beans-in-cache, cachefullException, outOfMemoryError

    Hi,
    I am trying to find the best way to find the numbers to be set in max-beans-in-cache
    for entity beans. I have a stateless session bean through which I access the entity
    beans. If I don't set any value for this property, in some query which will return
    2500 records, I get a cachefullexception and if I increase it and set this property
    to say 5000, I get an outofmemory error. I am not sure how to decide what value
    should be used. Any help or suggestion would be greatly appreciated. We are using
    WLS 7.0 on NT machines in a cluster.
    I have already tried the maxPermSize option in the jvm. The max heap size is
    set to 768m.
    Thanks,
    Jaideep

    Please reply only to the newsgroup.
    If you are doing a find and then invoking on the bean, splitting the transaction into
    multiple transactions that return smaller sets of beans is the only thing I can think of to
    get around the problem.
    If you are simply doing a find, but not invoking the beans, you could set finders-load-bean
    to false in the EJB deployment descriptor to avoid loading the bean when the finder is
    called. The bean will then be loaded and put into the cache only when it is invoked.
    However, this setting affects all finders defined on the bean and if you have transactions
    that do a find and invoke, performance could be lower if set to false.
    Unless relationship-caching is turned on, related beans are not loaded when a finder is
    invoked.
    Arunabh
    "Chadha, Jaideep" wrote:
    Thanks Arunabh. I tried different values and came
    up with the ones that suite our needs. Also the
    cache size is restricted in a transaction, we can
    split the transactions into multiple transactions
    especially for read-only data. Do you think that
    would be a good idea? I was also thinking if it
    was possible to define the attribute for the
    entity beans especially in case of relationships that
    they get loaded in finders when I need them but for
    some methods they don't get loaded in finders. And
    when a getXXX is invoked that particular bean gets
    loaded at that time.
    It will be helpful, if you could let me know.
    Thanks,
    JaideepArunabh Hazarika wrote:
    Increasing the max-beans-in-cache will always mean higher memory requirements. Afraid
    there is no way around it except to increase the max heap size. You could try a new
    feature in WLS 7.0 - application level caches. This is specified in the application
    deployment descriptor rather than at the bean deployment descriptor. With this cache,
    the cache size can be specified in terms of memory-size rather than an instance-count.
    You can find out how to set this from:
    http://e-docs.bea.com/wls/docs70/programming/app_xml.html (search for entity-cache)
    This cache would be shared across all EJBs in the application. Also, note that this will
    not prevent CacheFullExceptions from occuring, but would be more useful in avoiding
    OutOfMemory errors. To avoid CacheFullExceptions without indefinitely increasing the
    heap size, try to limit the number of beans loaded in a single transaction.
    Hope this helps
    Arunabh
    Jaideep wrote:
    Hi,
    I am trying to find the best way to find the numbers to be set in max-beans-in-cache
    for entity beans. I have a stateless session bean through which I access the entity
    beans. If I don't set any value for this property, in some query which will return
    2500 records, I get a cachefullexception and if I increase it and set this property
    to say 5000, I get an outofmemory error. I am not sure how to decide what value
    should be used. Any help or suggestion would be greatly appreciated. We are using
    WLS 7.0 on NT machines in a cluster.
    I have already tried the maxPermSize option in the jvm. The max heap size is
    set to 768m.
    Thanks,
    Jaideep

  • Changing max-beans-in-cache

    Hi all
    If I change max-beans-in-cache property then do I need to redeploy (run ejbc on)
    the stateful session beans or will the server pick it up when I just restart the
    app server.
    I am using Weblogic 6.1 SP2
    Regards
    Kamran Yousaf

    I believe I was wondering this once myself. An easy way to find out is to change
    the value and then restart the server and check the EJB's configuration in your
    weblogic console.
    You will need to redeploy the beans though which should happen automatically if
    the timestamp on your ear file or jar file changes.
    "kamran" <[email protected]> wrote:
    >
    Hi all
    If I change max-beans-in-cache property then do I need to redeploy (run
    ejbc on)
    the stateful session beans or will the server pick it up when I just
    restart the
    app server.
    I am using Weblogic 6.1 SP2
    Regards
    Kamran Yousaf

  • Max-beans-in-cache, cachefullexception, outofmemory error

    Hi,
    I am trying to find the best way to find the numbers to be set in max-beans-in-cache
    for entity beans. I have a stateless session bean through which I access the
    entity beans. If I don't set any value for this property, in some query which
    will return 2500 records, I get a cachefullexception and if I increase it and
    set this property to say 5000, I get an outofmemory error.
    I am not sure how to decide what value should be used.
    Any help or suggestion would be greatly appreciated.
    We are using WLS 7.0 on NT machines in a cluster.
    Thanks,
    Jaideep

    If you need to perform some sort of bulk processing then perhaps you
    shouldn't be using
    entity beans at all.
    "Jaideep" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]..
    >
    unfortunately, for a specific functionality in our application we need toget that
    many records. Now I am debating about changing the finder method so thatit returns
    only 500 records at one time and then I can call it multiple number oftimes.
    This may not be the best thing to do and we may take some kind of aperformance
    hit also but it may avoid the cachefull and outofmemory problems.
    Any suggestions or comments??
    Thanks,
    Jaideep
    Rob Woollen <[email protected]> wrote:
    First off, does what does the session bean or its caller do with the
    2500 or 5000 records? i.e. do you really need to select that many.
    Unfortunately there is no easy answer on how to set max-beans-in-cache.
    It depends a lot on your memory, application, and load.
    -- Rob
    Jaideep wrote:
    Hi,
    I am trying to find the best way to find the numbers to be set in
    max-beans-in-cache
    for entity beans. I have a stateless session bean through which Iaccess the
    entity beans. If I don't set any value for this property, in somequery which
    will return 2500 records, I get a cachefullexception and if I increaseit and
    set this property to say 5000, I get an outofmemory error.
    I am not sure how to decide what value should be used.
    Any help or suggestion would be greatly appreciated.
    We are using WLS 7.0 on NT machines in a cluster.
    Thanks,
    Jaideep
    Dimitri

  • How to determine the value of max-beans-in-cache

              As we have CacheFullException problem, but I dont know what is the side effect
              if I set an extremely large value for this parament. Is there any proper way
              to determine the proper value?
              

              "Jenny Wong" <[email protected]> wrote:
              >
              >As we have CacheFullException problem, but I dont know what is the side
              >effect
              >if I set an extremely large value for this parament. Is there any proper
              >way
              >to determine the proper value?
              Hi Jenny,
              The WebLogic Server allows you to configure the number of active beans (with an
              identity) which are present in the EJB cache.
              This cache is the in-memory space where beans exist.
              When a bean is brought into the cache, ejbActivate() is called, when it is removed,
              ejbPassivate() is called. It is basically
              equivalent to virtual memory being kept in memory or on disk. Tuning it too high
              will use up memory unnecessarily.
              Activation and passivation of EJBs is analogous to virtual memory on a computer.
              You want to minimize the number of times that
              your beans are activated and passivated. The cache size can help minimize this
              activity. To set determine if you cache size
              should be bigger, take a number of execution snapshots. Look at these snapshots
              of your execution and see if there is a lot of
              passivation and activation going on. If so, increase the size of your cache and
              see if performance improves. Otherwise, leave this
              value alone.
              regards,
              Ashok.
              

  • Min size for max-beans-in-cache / stateful EJB

    Hello,
    Weblogic (7 and 8) seems to have a minimum size for this setting.
    This minimum seems to be around 8 instances because when we set it to 3 for
    instance, the cache size reported by the admin console is 8 (with 8 active
    clients) and no ejb has been passivated.
    Is there an explanation for this behaviour ?
    Laurent

    I would also like to know the answer to this one.
    Can the default be changed via the administration console or config.xml? If so, where?

  • Clustering and Passivation

              I deployed a stateful session EJB on a cluster of WebLogic 6.0 with service pack
              1. I noticed that every method call is followed by a call to ejbPassivate and
              ejbActivate (even though I set the max-beans-in-cache descriptor to 200 and idle-timeout-seconds
              to 100). If I take out the stateful-session-clustering section in the deployment
              descriptor, ejbPassivate and ejbActivate is no longer invoked after every method
              call.
              What is the reason for this behavior? And is there anyway to stop this (the ejbPassivate
              and ejbActivate methods contain some complicated logic and invoking those methods
              all the time is too intensive)?
              Thanks for your help.
              Steve
              

    Hi Steve,
              We use in-memory replication to cluster stateful session bean. so we need to
              serialize the state before we create or update the secondary. We do it in
              ejbPassivate(), that is why you are seeing it. when you just deploy it in a
              single server, we do not need to do it, that is why you do not see
              ejbPassivate() being called.
              Thanks
              Yu Tian
              Steve Lu <[email protected]> wrote in message
              news:3b27aa60$[email protected]..
              >
              > I deployed a stateful session EJB on a cluster of WebLogic 6.0 with
              service pack
              > 1. I noticed that every method call is followed by a call to ejbPassivate
              and
              > ejbActivate (even though I set the max-beans-in-cache descriptor to 200
              and idle-timeout-seconds
              > to 100). If I take out the stateful-session-clustering section in the
              deployment
              > descriptor, ejbPassivate and ejbActivate is no longer invoked after every
              method
              > call.
              >
              > What is the reason for this behavior? And is there anyway to stop this
              (the ejbPassivate
              > and ejbActivate methods contain some complicated logic and invoking those
              methods
              > all the time is too intensive)?
              >
              > Thanks for your help.
              >
              > Steve
              

  • Stateful beans in cache doesn't seem to work

    I have a stateful bean that I have set max beans in cache to "1". When I deploy it, no errors reported or so, the Weblogic console still states "8" in the column "Cached Beans Current Count" when monitoring the bean.
    When I view the descriptor in the console it looks fine. What can be wrong here?
    Using Weblogic 8.1 SP4, here's the statueful descriptor:
    <weblogic-enterprise-bean>
    <ejb-name>MyStatefulBean</ejb-name>
    <stateful-session-descriptor>
    <stateful-session-cache>
    <max-beans-in-cache>1</max-beans-in-cache>
    </stateful-session-cache>
    <allow-concurrent-calls>True</allow-concurrent-calls>
    </stateful-session-descriptor>
    <reference-descriptor>
    </reference-descriptor>
    <enable-call-by-reference>True</enable-call-by-reference>
    <jndi-name>test.mystatefulbean/MyStatefulBean/Home</jndi-name>
    <local-jndi-name>test.mystatefulbean/MyStatefulBean/LocalHome</local-jndi-name>
    </weblogic-enterprise-bean>

    I agree with you about the host not being able to install (or at least don't want to install/upgrade) their servers to php5.4...  Unfortunately, I can't change that...  but by shutting them off took care of all the quotes (single & double) and any other characters which would basically function like an addslashes() command.  I'll paste the script below...  It's still pretty much the same as when you helped me out with the script...  Just minor adjustments:::  If you can show me (even though I fixed the problem) how I would integrate the stripslashes() function to the comment field it would be helpful to know for future reference.
    <?php // Script 1.0 - contactlist.php
    if (isset($_POST['submit']) && !empty($_POST['submit'])) // Test if submit button named submit was clicked and not empty
              if (!empty($_POST['first']) && !empty($_POST['last'])  && !empty($_POST['email']) && !empty($_POST['phone']) && !empty($_POST['comment'])) {
    $comment=stripslashes($_POST[comment]);
                        $body = "First Name: {$_POST['first']}\nLast Name: {$_POST['last']}\nEmail Address: {$_POST['email']}\nContact Phone Number: {$_POST['phone']}\nContact Preference: {$_POST['contactvia']}\n\nBest Time To Contact: {$_POST['timepref']}\n\nComments:\n {$_POST['comment']}";
                        $body = wordwrap($body, 70);
                        mail([email protected]', 'NEW Customer Inquiry Submission',$body, "From: {$_POST['email']}");
                        header('Location: index.html');  //Redirect to new url if form submitted
    ?>

  • Reporting on Max beans ever in cache

    In the Weblogic 5.1 console, for Distributed Objects/EJB/Deployed Beans, on
    the properties tab there are values for max beans ever in cache and max
    cache size. Is there some way to access these values through a java class
    (or some other way) so that I can do a report to see what EJBs have come
    close to reaching their max cache size. We have over 500 beans deployed and
    need some way to pro-actively check these values. I did not see any API doc
    for the console on the website.
    Thanks

    You can start by looking at this example:
    http://dima.dhs.org/misc/WLStats.jsp
    and serverinfo utility at
    http://developer.bea.com/code/alpha.jsp
    Chip Whiteside <[email protected]> wrote:
    In the Weblogic 5.1 console, for Distributed Objects/EJB/Deployed Beans, on
    the properties tab there are values for max beans ever in cache and max
    cache size. Is there some way to access these values through a java class
    (or some other way) so that I can do a report to see what EJBs have come
    close to reaching their max cache size. We have over 500 beans deployed and
    need some way to pro-actively check these values. I did not see any API doc
    for the console on the website.
    Thanks--
    Dimitri

  • About Container-managed Transactions and Bean-managed Transactions

    as the document of weblogic7.0 describe the differents of Container-managed
              Transactions and Bean-managed Transactions,and in the document,It tell us
              details of using Bean-managed Transactions,such as \:
              import javax.naming.*;import javax.transaction.UserTransaction;.....
              import java.sql.*;import java.util.*;
              UserTransaction tx = (UserTransaction)
              ctx.lookup("javax.transaction.UserTransaction");tx.begin();
              tx.commit() //or tx.rollback
              but how to use Container-managed Transactions?
              what is EJB's deployment descriptor? can someone tell me?
              i wonder someone will show me an example of how to use Container-managed
              Transactions.
              thanks
              fish
              

    Many if not all of the WLS EJB examples use container-managed
              transactions. That's a good place to start.
              I'd also recommend that you pick up a decent EJB book. There's several
              on the market right now.
              -- Rob
              fish wrote:
              > <ejb-jar>
              > <enterprise-beans>
              > <session>
              > <ejb-name>testbean</ejb-name>
              > <home>test.test.TestHome</home>
              > <remote>test.test.Test</remote>
              > <ejb-class>test.test.TestBean</ejb-class>
              > <session-type>Stateful</session-type>
              > <transaction-type>Container</transaction-type>
              > </session>
              > </enterprise-beans>
              >
              > <assembly-descriptor>
              > <container-transaction>
              > <method>
              > <ejb-name>EmployeeRecord</ejb-name>
              > <method-name>*</method-name>
              > </method>
              > <trans-attribute>Required</trans-attribute>
              > </container-transaction>
              > </assembly-descriptor>
              > </ejb-jar>
              > ----------------------------------------------
              > seems i have to write ejb-jar.xml like this,am i right?
              > what about <ejb-client-jar>? is it needed in this xml file?
              >
              > thanks
              >
              > fish
              >
              >
              

Maybe you are looking for