Maximum Number of Parameters

Hi,
Is there any limit for the maximum number of Parameters i can pass to a procedure or function.
Thank you for the help.

There is a physical limit of 64k (65536) parameters which is based on limits imposed by PL/SQLs intermediate parsed form, DIANA. See
http://download-west.oracle.com/docs/cd/B14117_01/appdev.101/b10807/e_limits.htm#LNPLS018
However passing more than a handful is often considered a 'bad practice' - in such cases you might consider alternatives such as aggregating variables into composite types such as collections or record types in order to pass them around effectively.

Similar Messages

Function Modules: maximum number of parameters ?

Q: Is there a limit of maximum number of parameters existing, while calling a function module.
I didn't find a hint in the ABAP-Documentation.
We have a function module, with 120 parameters and this should be enlarged by about 25 new parameters.
Can this cause a problem ?

hi,
why do you want to go for such an approach?
instead create a Table Type in the Data dictionary and create fields in it. Populate this Table type in your program and pass it to the FM.
doesnt it sounds a neat way of development??
ags.

Maximum number of parameters sent to stored procedure

I have a web form from where I insert data to Oracle. There are at least 20 fileds on the form. For INSERT I want to use Stored Procedure. But in this case for VALUES section of the INSERT statement I need to send that many- in this case 20 parameters. Is this normal for a procedure to receive 20 parameters? If it's not, then what way should I follow to perform this? I know technically there's no problem but is this normal programming or database managementwise? I think this is the basic thing all web developer do all the time.

He's got 20 fields on a web form and you think using SQL*Loader is a good idea ?because I do not believe that he has to enter these fields once time.
You want him to write the values to a flat file, generate a control file, then invoke SQL*Loader ?I know that the first time you create all those files can be a problem, but when you have all , the next times its just change the information into flat file.
Did you read the question ?Yes, i did
It's only my opinion, He can accept it or not.
any other question not related to help him to solve his problem?

Is there a max number of parameters that can be passed to a C function in test stand v. 1.0.1

I have had an issue with test stand version 1.0.1 (yes, I know; it's quite old) and calling a C function thru an action step. when I call this function with 18 parameters, it seems to hang. I have called a function with 16 and it seems to work. Is this a limit of the software? I am calling the function from a windows DLL that we've created. When I try to pull the function from the dll into test stand I also get a { error...but I get that in the other function's call and it seems to work fine. Any ideas?

ok, upon re-reading what I posted I can clearly see your confusion. haha. I think there are two separate issues.
1) Are there a maximum number of parameters one can use when calling a C function from a DLL? Yes, i'm trying to call a C function from test stand.
2) when I select the "module" tab, and select which DLL contains my function, the prototype has no information associated with it (by clicking the reload prototype button). I'm not sure why, as I'm using a declspec to send the function information out of the dll, but that's another topic. So I click on the source file tab and point the window to the .cpp of my function (within the DLL's project workspace) and when it begins to parse the file, I get an error about mis-matched curly brackets and if I wish to continue, and skip the rest of the parsing.
I click "OK" and when I go back to the module tab, I am able to see all my functions, along with the parameters in the drop down menu below. I fill in all the parameters and everything looks ok; no syntax errors, or anything else seemingly suspicious. I then run my test stand code and when I get to the step which calls this function, the system hangs and cannot proceed.
Any thoughts as to what might cause these issues?

Increasing maximum number of Logical Processors in a Processor Group greater than the default (64)

Can the maximum number of Logical Processors allowed in a Processor Group be increased by Bcdedit command or registry key to a number greater than the default (64) to allow non-group-aware applications to seamlessly scale via multithreading across more cores
MSDN documents methods to reduce the max number of LP's in a Processor Group to 1 or any power of 2 less than 64 in order to increase the number of Processor Groups. But there is no discussion of how to increase the maximum number of Logical Processors
allowed in a Processor Group to a number greater than the default (64), e.g. to 128 or 256.
Since a non-group-aware application/process can only run on 1 Processor Group, increasing this limit is needed to allow non-group-aware multithreaded applications to scale seamlessly for parallel computation across more than 64 cores simultaneously on systems
with more than 64 cores (for example, a quad-socket Intel Xeon system with 24 cores per socket, including true and hyper cores). If that limit can be set via registry key or command line, or if there is another way to force all the cores on
all 4 sockets (4 NUMA nodes in this case) to join in 1 Processor Group, then non-group-aware applications will not need to be rewritten using group-aware thread-affinity APIs.

Hi John,
Are you trying to specify a static NUMA-node-to-group assignment, rather than letting Windows dynamically assign NUMA nodes to groups at boot time? If yes, You can refer the
following related KB:
How to manually configure K-Group assignment on multiprocessor machines
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2506384
Systems with fewer than 64 logical processors always have a single group, Group 0. On systems with 64 or fewer processors, existing applications will operate correctly without
modification. Applications that do not call any functions that use processor affinity masks or processor numbers will operate correctly on all systems, regardless of the number of processors. To operate correctly on systems with more than 64 logical processors,
the following kinds of applications might require modification:
•Applications that manage, maintain, or display per-processor information for the entire system must be modified to support more than 64 logical processors. An example of
such an application is Windows Task Manager, which displays the workload of each processor in the system.
•Applications for which performance is critical and that can scale efficiently beyond 64 logical processors must be modified to run on such systems. For example, database
applications might benefit from modifications.
•If an application uses a DLL that has per-processor data structures, and the DLL has not been modified to support more than 64 logical processors, all threads in the application
that call functions exported by the DLL must be assigned to the same group.
By design, a non-NUMA computer is considered to have one NUMA node. Because NUMA nodes cannot span groups, the system creates a node for each group after you restart the computer.
The related KB:
Processor Groups
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/dd405503(v=vs.85).aspx
More information:
Uneven Windows Processor Groups
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/saponsqlserver/archive/2011/10/08/uneven-windows-processor-groups.aspx
Boot Parameters to Test Drivers for Multiple Processor Group Support
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/hardware/ff542298(v=vs.85).aspx
I’m glad to be of help to you!
We
are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this
interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time.
Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.

Plsql dynamic region with more than the maximum number of items

Hi,
I need suggestions! :)
I have to make a page with many many items. We have a table storing the content of a SQL script, each statement is an individual row in the table. The page I'm trying to make must display each statement in an individual textbox/textarea (and two others items for different attributes).
In a dynamic plsql region, the maximum number of items seems to be 1990, after that, a "Page not found" is launched. So, after 643 statements, I reach the limit...! :(
A solution could be to generate "custom" textfield or textarea (htp.p('<input type=text name="stmt1" value="StmtText">');), but, is it possible to access their values when the page is submitted ?
Second solution is to make a pagination every 600 statements, but I don't like it!
Anything else ?
Thank you!
Jonathan

Anton,
at least to my knowledge there you will have the same limitation. Because the limitation is that the f procedure of APEX doesn't have more parameters to support more fields. It's not a limitation of the APEX Builder.
It would only work if you assign all your items to the same name, so that they are transfered in an array, like the tabular form.
Patrick
My APEX Blog: http://inside-apex.blogspot.com
The ApexLib Framework: http://apexlib.sourceforge.net
The APEX Builder Plugin: http://sourceforge.net/projects/apexplugin/

How to get maximum number of results using content presenter taskflow

Hello Friends,
I am using 11.1.1.6,
Below is the query is getting executed while content presenter taskflow get executed, Though I have more than 100 results in UCM, I am always getting only 25. Is there anywhere I can configure to fetch maximum number of results ? Though I set maxResults = 200, It always returns 25.
SELECT * FROM ora:t:IDC:GlobalProfile WHERE ora:p:xRegionDefinition = 'NEWS_REG_DEF' AND ora:p:xArchiveFlag='Yes' and ora:p:xDocumentSortDate > TIMESTAMP '2014-01-01T00:00:00.000+00:00' and ora:p:xDocumentSortDate < TIMESTAMP '2014-12-31T00:00:00.000+00:00' ORDER BY ora:p:xDocumentSortDate DESC
Page Def.xml : here the taskflow entries configured in page def xml file
<taskFlow id="doclibcontentpresenter2"
              taskFlowId="/oracle/webcenter/doclib/view/jsf/taskflows/presenter/contentPresenter.xml#doclib-content-presenter"
              activation="deferred"
              xmlns="http://xmlns.oracle.com/adf/controller/binding"
              Refresh="ifNeeded"
              RefreshCondition="#{requestScope.pRefreshArchiveNewsSction='Y'}">
      <parameters>
        <parameter id="taskFlowInstId" value="${'myinst'}"/>
        <parameter id="datasourceType" value="${'dsTypeQueryExpression'}"/>
        <parameter id="datasource"
                   value="#{backingBeanScope.ArchiveBean.contentQuery}"/>
        <parameter id="templateCategory" value="${''}"/>
        <parameter id="templateView" value="${'templates.archive.list'}"/>
        <parameter id="regionTemplate" value="${'false'}"/>
        <parameter id="maxResults" value="200"/>
      </parameters>
    </taskFlow>

Hi Dan,
Here is the detailed logs
searchcache/6
02.19 15:21:14.656
SearchCache
Approximately 0% of the available cache space is used.
>searchquery/7
02.19 15:23:53.642
IdcServer-14885
Query by [email protected] from CIS
>searchquery/6
02.19 15:23:53.643
IdcServer-14885
preparedQueryText: ( ((xRegionDefinition <matches> `NEWS_REG_DEF`) <and> ((xArchiveFlag <matches> `Yes`) <and> ((xDocumentSortDate>`2013-01-01 00:00:00`) <and> (xDocumentSortDate<`2013-12-31 00:00:00`)))) )
>searchquery/6
02.19 15:23:53.643
IdcServer-14885
Setting substr to other operator conv flag: '( ((xRegionDefinition <matches> `NEWS_REG_DEF`) <and> ((xArchiveFlag <matches> `Yes`) <and> ((xDocumentSortDate>`2013-01-01 00:00:00`) <and> (xDocumentSortDate<`2013-12-31 00:00:00`)))) )'
>searchqueryparse/6
02.19 15:23:53.643
IdcServer-14885
Into parse of UniversalSearchQuery for: ( ((xRegionDefinition <matches> `NEWS_REG_DEF`) <and> ((xArchiveFlag <matches> `Yes`) <and> ((xDocumentSortDate>`2013-01-01 00:00:00`) <and> (xDocumentSortDate<`2013-12-31 00:00:00`)))) )
>searchqueryparse/6
02.19 15:23:53.643
IdcServer-14885
Into parseQueryEx of UniversalSearchQueryParser for queryArr : ( ((xRegionDefinition <matches> `NEWS_REG_DEF`) <and> ((xArchiveFlag <matches> `Yes`) <and> ((xDocumentSortDate>`2013-01-01 00:00:00`) <and> (xDocumentSortDate<`2013-12-31 00:00:00`)))) )
>searchquery/6
02.19 15:23:53.643
IdcServer-14885
Parsing universal query: '( ((xRegionDefinition <matches> `NEWS_REG_DEF`) <and> ((xArchiveFlag <matches> `Yes`) <and> ((xDocumentSortDate>`2013-01-01 00:00:00`) <and> (xDocumentSortDate<`2013-12-31 00:00:00`)))) )'
>searchquery/6
02.19 15:23:53.643
IdcServer-14885
Processing callback on query value 'NEWS_REG_DEF'
>searchqueryparse/6
02.19 15:23:53.643
IdcServer-14885
Into appendClauseElement CommonSearchConfig with operator : equals value : NEWS_REG_DEF
>searchqueryparse/6
02.19 15:23:53.643
IdcServer-14885
Processing actions list size : 1 on the input value : xRegionDefinition with searchengine ORACLETEXTSEARCH
>searchqueryparse/6
02.19 15:23:53.643
IdcServer-14885
Processing action number : 0 : prefix on the input value : xRegionDefinition with searchengine ORACLETEXTSEARCH
>searchqueryparse/6
02.19 15:23:53.643
IdcServer-14885
Processing actions list size : 2 on the input value : NEWS_REG_DEF with searchengine ORACLETEXTSEARCH
>searchqueryparse/6
02.19 15:23:53.643
IdcServer-14885
Processing action number : 0 : upperCase on the input value : NEWS_REG_DEF with searchengine ORACLETEXTSEARCH
>searchqueryparse/6
02.19 15:23:53.643
IdcServer-14885
Processing action number : 1 : escape on the input value : NEWS_REG_DEF with searchengine ORACLETEXTSEARCH
>searchqueryparse/6
02.19 15:23:53.643
IdcServer-14885
Processed escape with '' resulting in value :NEWS_REG_DEF
>searchqueryparse/6
02.19 15:23:53.643
IdcServer-14885
Processed escape with _ resulting in value :NEWS_REG_DEF
>searchqueryparse/6
02.19 15:23:53.643
IdcServer-14885
Processed escape with \- resulting in value :NEWS_REG_DEF
>searchqueryparse/6
02.19 15:23:53.643
IdcServer-14885
Processed escape with \_ resulting in value :NEWS\_REG\_DEF
>searchqueryparse/6
02.19 15:23:53.643
IdcServer-14885
Processed escape with \, resulting in value :NEWS\_REG\_DEF
>searchqueryparse/6
02.19 15:23:53.643
IdcServer-14885
Into appendClauseElement CommonSearchConfig with operator : and value :
>searchquery/6
02.19 15:23:53.643
IdcServer-14885
Processing callback on query value 'Yes'
>searchqueryparse/6
02.19 15:23:53.643
IdcServer-14885
Into appendClauseElement CommonSearchConfig with operator : equals value : Yes
>searchqueryparse/6
02.19 15:23:53.643
IdcServer-14885
Processing actions list size : 1 on the input value : xArchiveFlag with searchengine ORACLETEXTSEARCH
>searchqueryparse/6
02.19 15:23:53.643
IdcServer-14885
Processing action number : 0 : prefix on the input value : xArchiveFlag with searchengine ORACLETEXTSEARCH
>searchqueryparse/6
02.19 15:23:53.643
IdcServer-14885
Processing actions list size : 2 on the input value : Yes with searchengine ORACLETEXTSEARCH
>searchqueryparse/6
02.19 15:23:53.643
IdcServer-14885
Processing action number : 0 : upperCase on the input value : Yes with searchengine ORACLETEXTSEARCH
>searchqueryparse/6
02.19 15:23:53.644
IdcServer-14885
Processing action number : 1 : escape on the input value : YES with searchengine ORACLETEXTSEARCH
>searchqueryparse/6
02.19 15:23:53.644
IdcServer-14885
Processed escape with '' resulting in value :YES
>searchqueryparse/6
02.19 15:23:53.644
IdcServer-14885
Processed escape with _ resulting in value :YES
>searchqueryparse/6
02.19 15:23:53.644
IdcServer-14885
Processed escape with \- resulting in value :YES
>searchqueryparse/6
02.19 15:23:53.644
IdcServer-14885
Processed escape with \_ resulting in value :YES
>searchqueryparse/6
02.19 15:23:53.644
IdcServer-14885
Processed escape with \, resulting in value :YES
>searchqueryparse/6
02.19 15:23:53.644
IdcServer-14885
Into appendClauseElement CommonSearchConfig with operator : and value :
>searchquery/6
02.19 15:23:53.644
IdcServer-14885
Processing callback on query value '2013-01-01 00:00:00'
>searchqueryparse/6
02.19 15:23:53.644
IdcServer-14885
Into appendClauseElement CommonSearchConfig with operator : dateGreater value : 2012/12/31 18:00:00
>searchqueryparse/6
02.19 15:23:53.644
IdcServer-14885
Into appendClauseElement CommonSearchConfig with operator : and value :
>searchquery/6
02.19 15:23:53.644
IdcServer-14885
Processing callback on query value '2013-12-31 00:00:00'
>searchqueryparse/6
02.19 15:23:53.644
IdcServer-14885
Into appendClauseElement CommonSearchConfig with operator : dateLess value : 2013/12/30 18:00:00
>searchquery/6
02.19 15:23:53.644
IdcServer-14885
Converted native query: '((( SDATA(sdxRegionDefinition LIKE 'NEWS\_REG\_DEF') ) and (( SDATA(sdxArchiveFlag LIKE 'YES') ) and (( SDATA(xDocumentSortDate > '2012/12/31 18:00:00') ) and ( SDATA(xDocumentSortDate < '2013/12/30 18:00:00') )))))'
>searchquery/7
02.19 15:23:53.644
IdcServer-14885
assigning connection
>searchquery/6
02.19 15:23:53.644
IdcServer-14885
!csMonitorActiveDbConnections,1
>searchquery/6
02.19 15:23:53.644
IdcServer-14885
Connection is added to active connections with key of '[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '35' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)''.
>searchquery/6
02.19 15:23:53.644
IdcServer-14885
query(live): (((((((((((( SDATA(sdxRegionDefinition LIKE 'NEWS\_REG\_DEF') ) and (( SDATA(sdxArchiveFlag LIKE 'YES') ) and (( SDATA(xDocumentSortDate > '2012/12/31 18:00:00') ) and ( SDATA(xDocumentSortDate < '2013/12/30 18:00:00') )))))))))))))) [1,51] sort(xDocumentSortDate DESC)
>search/6
02.19 15:23:53.688
IdcServer-14885
Start parsing drill down fields with SAX...
>search/6
02.19 15:23:53.691
IdcServer-14885
Completed parsing 1 groups.
>search/7
02.19 15:23:53.692
IdcServer-14885
ResultSetInterface results: <ctx_result_set><hitlist><hit><sdata name="DID">11489</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1-006063</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">16132</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1-006403</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">13513</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1-006591</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">11319</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1-006003</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">17043</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1004050</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">16477</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1-006407</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">16162</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1-006593</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">16010</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1-006399</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">10524</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1-005609</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">10777</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1-005601</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">10508</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1-005600</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">10476</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1-005585</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">12427</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1-006397</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">16333</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1-005580</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">17080</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1004051</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">15926</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1-006482</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">16857</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1003963</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">16895</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1003964</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">16487</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1-006481</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">12431</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1-006485</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">16813</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1003977</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">9569</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1-005342</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">16814</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1003978</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">17045</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1004056</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">12246</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1-006478</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">15911</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1-005652</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">16775</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1003999</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">11925</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">VMOHSKEND05482000776</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">15639</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">VMOHSKEND05482000763</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">16865</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">VMOHSKEND05482000770</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">10100</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">VMOHSKEND05482000741</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">17116</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1004054</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">9015</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">VMOHSKEND05482000801</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">16474</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1-006061</sdata><score>100</score></hit></hitlist><count>34</count><groups sdata="SDDRILLDOWN"><group value="Document,insight_application1,"><count>34</count></group></groups></ctx_result_set>
>search/7
02.19 15:23:53.692
IdcServer-14885
Trace:
search/7
02.19 15:23:53.692
IdcServer-14885
ctx_query.result_set start time:15:23:53.64
search/7
02.19 15:23:53.692
IdcServer-14885
ctx_query.result_set   end time:15:23:53.66
search/7
02.19 15:23:53.692
IdcServer-14885
Result parsing start time: 15:23:53.66
search/7
02.19 15:23:53.692
IdcServer-14885
Result parsing   end time: 15:23:53.67
search/7
02.19 15:23:53.692
IdcServer-14885
SELECT dDocName,dDocTitle,dDocType,dSecurityGroup,dInDate,xArchiveFlag,xHidden,xWebsiteObjectType,xWebsiteSection,xDontShowInListsForWebsites,dRevisionID,dDocCreator,dWebExtension,xUpdateContentType,xSubmitForApproval,xFilesAllowed,xRegionDefinition,xWCWorkflowAssignment,dDocCreatedDate,dCreateDate,xWCTags,dOriginalName,xNewsType,dFormat,dPublishType,dDocFunction,dDocAuthor,VaultFileSize,dDocLastModifier,xWebFlag,dOutDate,dGif,dExtension,dDocLastModifiedDate,xClbraRoleList,xInhibitUpdate,URL,AlternateFormat,WebFileSize,xClbraUserList,dDocOwner,xReadOnly,dRevClassID,xWCWorkflowApproverUserList,xCollectionID,xComments,xPartitionId,dRevLabel,xStorageRule,dFullTextFormat,xWebsites,xDocumentSortDate,dRendition2,dRendition1,dID,xReadyForReplication,dDocAccount,xReadMoreURL,xIdcProfile,xClbraAliasList,otsFormat,otsCharset,otsLanguage FROM IdcText2 WHERE dID IN (11489,16132,13513,11319,17043,16477,16162,16010,10524,10777,10508,10476,12427,16333,17080,15926,16857,16895,16487,12431,16813,9569,16814,17045,12246,15911,16775,11925,15639,16865,10100,17116,9015,16474)
search/7
02.19 15:23:53.692
IdcServer-14885
Meta query start time: 15:23:53.67
search/7
02.19 15:23:53.692
IdcServer-14885
Meta query end time:15:23:53.67
>searchquery/6
02.19 15:23:53.692
IdcServer-14885
!csMonitorActiveDbConnections,0
>searchquery/6
02.19 15:23:53.692
IdcServer-14885
Connection is removed from active connections with key of '[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '35' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)''.
>searchquery/6
02.19 15:23:53.692
IdcServer-14885
release pool connection
>searchquery/6
02.19 15:23:53.708
IdcServer-14885
Execution time is 65 ms.
>searchquery/7
02.19 15:23:53.945
IdcServer-14886
Query by [email protected] from CIS
>searchquery/6
02.19 15:23:53.946
IdcServer-14886
preparedQueryText: ( ((xRegionDefinition <matches> `NEWS_REG_DEF`) <and> ((xArchiveFlag <matches> `Yes`) <and> ((xDocumentSortDate>`2013-01-01 00:00:00`) <and> (xDocumentSortDate<`2013-12-31 00:00:00`)))) )
>searchquery/6
02.19 15:23:53.946
IdcServer-14886
Setting substr to other operator conv flag: '( ((xRegionDefinition <matches> `NEWS_REG_DEF`) <and> ((xArchiveFlag <matches> `Yes`) <and> ((xDocumentSortDate>`2013-01-01 00:00:00`) <and> (xDocumentSortDate<`2013-12-31 00:00:00`)))) )'
>searchqueryparse/6
02.19 15:23:53.946
IdcServer-14886
Into parse of UniversalSearchQuery for: ( ((xRegionDefinition <matches> `NEWS_REG_DEF`) <and> ((xArchiveFlag <matches> `Yes`) <and> ((xDocumentSortDate>`2013-01-01 00:00:00`) <and> (xDocumentSortDate<`2013-12-31 00:00:00`)))) )
>searchqueryparse/6
02.19 15:23:53.946
IdcServer-14886
Into parseQueryEx of UniversalSearchQueryParser for queryArr : ( ((xRegionDefinition <matches> `NEWS_REG_DEF`) <and> ((xArchiveFlag <matches> `Yes`) <and> ((xDocumentSortDate>`2013-01-01 00:00:00`) <and> (xDocumentSortDate<`2013-12-31 00:00:00`)))) )
>searchquery/6
02.19 15:23:53.946
IdcServer-14886
Parsing universal query: '( ((xRegionDefinition <matches> `NEWS_REG_DEF`) <and> ((xArchiveFlag <matches> `Yes`) <and> ((xDocumentSortDate>`2013-01-01 00:00:00`) <and> (xDocumentSortDate<`2013-12-31 00:00:00`)))) )'
>searchquery/6
02.19 15:23:53.946
IdcServer-14886
Processing callback on query value 'NEWS_REG_DEF'
>searchqueryparse/6
02.19 15:23:53.946
IdcServer-14886
Into appendClauseElement CommonSearchConfig with operator : equals value : NEWS_REG_DEF
>searchqueryparse/6
02.19 15:23:53.946
IdcServer-14886
Processing actions list size : 1 on the input value : xRegionDefinition with searchengine ORACLETEXTSEARCH
>searchqueryparse/6
02.19 15:23:53.946
IdcServer-14886
Processing action number : 0 : prefix on the input value : xRegionDefinition with searchengine ORACLETEXTSEARCH
>searchqueryparse/6
02.19 15:23:53.946
IdcServer-14886
Processing actions list size : 2 on the input value : NEWS_REG_DEF with searchengine ORACLETEXTSEARCH
>searchqueryparse/6
02.19 15:23:53.946
IdcServer-14886
Processing action number : 0 : upperCase on the input value : NEWS_REG_DEF with searchengine ORACLETEXTSEARCH
>searchqueryparse/6
02.19 15:23:53.946
IdcServer-14886
Processing action number : 1 : escape on the input value : NEWS_REG_DEF with searchengine ORACLETEXTSEARCH
>searchqueryparse/6
02.19 15:23:53.946
IdcServer-14886
Processed escape with '' resulting in value :NEWS_REG_DEF
>searchqueryparse/6
02.19 15:23:53.946
IdcServer-14886
Processed escape with _ resulting in value :NEWS_REG_DEF
>searchqueryparse/6
02.19 15:23:53.946
IdcServer-14886
Processed escape with \- resulting in value :NEWS_REG_DEF
>searchqueryparse/6
02.19 15:23:53.946
IdcServer-14886
Processed escape with \_ resulting in value :NEWS\_REG\_DEF
>searchqueryparse/6
02.19 15:23:53.946
IdcServer-14886
Processed escape with \, resulting in value :NEWS\_REG\_DEF
>searchqueryparse/6
02.19 15:23:53.946
IdcServer-14886
Into appendClauseElement CommonSearchConfig with operator : and value :
>searchquery/6
02.19 15:23:53.946
IdcServer-14886
Processing callback on query value 'Yes'
>searchqueryparse/6
02.19 15:23:53.946
IdcServer-14886
Into appendClauseElement CommonSearchConfig with operator : equals value : Yes
>searchqueryparse/6
02.19 15:23:53.946
IdcServer-14886
Processing actions list size : 1 on the input value : xArchiveFlag with searchengine ORACLETEXTSEARCH
>searchqueryparse/6
02.19 15:23:53.946
IdcServer-14886
Processing action number : 0 : prefix on the input value : xArchiveFlag with searchengine ORACLETEXTSEARCH
>searchqueryparse/6
02.19 15:23:53.946
IdcServer-14886
Processing actions list size : 2 on the input value : Yes with searchengine ORACLETEXTSEARCH
>searchqueryparse/6
02.19 15:23:53.946
IdcServer-14886
Processing action number : 0 : upperCase on the input value : Yes with searchengine ORACLETEXTSEARCH
>searchqueryparse/6
02.19 15:23:53.946
IdcServer-14886
Processing action number : 1 : escape on the input value : YES with searchengine ORACLETEXTSEARCH
>searchqueryparse/6
02.19 15:23:53.946
IdcServer-14886
Processed escape with '' resulting in value :YES
>searchqueryparse/6
02.19 15:23:53.946
IdcServer-14886
Processed escape with _ resulting in value :YES
>searchqueryparse/6
02.19 15:23:53.946
IdcServer-14886
Processed escape with \- resulting in value :YES
>searchqueryparse/6
02.19 15:23:53.947
IdcServer-14886
Processed escape with \_ resulting in value :YES
>searchqueryparse/6
02.19 15:23:53.947
IdcServer-14886
Processed escape with \, resulting in value :YES
>searchqueryparse/6
02.19 15:23:53.947
IdcServer-14886
Into appendClauseElement CommonSearchConfig with operator : and value :
>searchquery/6
02.19 15:23:53.947
IdcServer-14886
Processing callback on query value '2013-01-01 00:00:00'
>searchqueryparse/6
02.19 15:23:53.947
IdcServer-14886
Into appendClauseElement CommonSearchConfig with operator : dateGreater value : 2012/12/31 18:00:00
>searchqueryparse/6
02.19 15:23:53.947
IdcServer-14886
Into appendClauseElement CommonSearchConfig with operator : and value :
>searchquery/6
02.19 15:23:53.947
IdcServer-14886
Processing callback on query value '2013-12-31 00:00:00'
>searchqueryparse/6
02.19 15:23:53.947
IdcServer-14886
Into appendClauseElement CommonSearchConfig with operator : dateLess value : 2013/12/30 18:00:00
>searchquery/6
02.19 15:23:53.947
IdcServer-14886
Converted native query: '((( SDATA(sdxRegionDefinition LIKE 'NEWS\_REG\_DEF') ) and (( SDATA(sdxArchiveFlag LIKE 'YES') ) and (( SDATA(xDocumentSortDate > '2012/12/31 18:00:00') ) and ( SDATA(xDocumentSortDate < '2013/12/30 18:00:00') )))))'
>searchquery/7
02.19 15:23:53.947
IdcServer-14886
assigning connection
>searchquery/6
02.19 15:23:53.947
IdcServer-14886
!csMonitorActiveDbConnections,1
>searchquery/6
02.19 15:23:53.947
IdcServer-14886
Connection is added to active connections with key of '[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '1' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)''.
>searchquery/6
02.19 15:23:53.947
IdcServer-14886
query(live): (((((((((((( SDATA(sdxRegionDefinition LIKE 'NEWS\_REG\_DEF') ) and (( SDATA(sdxArchiveFlag LIKE 'YES') ) and (( SDATA(xDocumentSortDate > '2012/12/31 18:00:00') ) and ( SDATA(xDocumentSortDate < '2013/12/30 18:00:00') )))))))))))))) [1,51] sort(xDocumentSortDate DESC)
>search/6
02.19 15:23:53.992
IdcServer-14886
Start parsing drill down fields with SAX...
>search/6
02.19 15:23:53.993
IdcServer-14886
Completed parsing 1 groups.
>search/7
02.19 15:23:53.994
IdcServer-14886
ResultSetInterface results: <ctx_result_set><hitlist><hit><sdata name="DID">11489</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1-006063</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">16132</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1-006403</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">13513</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1-006591</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">11319</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1-006003</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">17043</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1004050</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">16477</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1-006407</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">16162</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1-006593</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">16010</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1-006399</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">10524</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1-005609</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">10777</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1-005601</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">10508</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1-005600</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">10476</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1-005585</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">12427</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1-006397</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">16333</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1-005580</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">17080</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1004051</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">15926</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1-006482</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">16857</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1003963</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">16895</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1003964</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">16487</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1-006481</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">12431</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1-006485</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">16813</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1003977</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">9569</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1-005342</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">16814</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1003978</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">17045</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1004056</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">12246</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1-006478</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">15911</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1-005652</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">16775</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1003999</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">11925</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">VMOHSKEND05482000776</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">15639</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">VMOHSKEND05482000763</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">16865</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">VMOHSKEND05482000770</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">10100</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">VMOHSKEND05482000741</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">17116</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1004054</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">9015</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">VMOHSKEND05482000801</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">16474</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1-006061</sdata><score>100</score></hit></hitlist><count>34</count><groups sdata="SDDRILLDOWN"><group value="Document,insight_application1,"><count>34</count></group></groups></ctx_result_set>
>search/7
02.19 15:23:53.994
IdcServer-14886
Trace:
search/7
02.19 15:23:53.994
IdcServer-14886
ctx_query.result_set start time:15:23:53.95
search/7
02.19 15:23:53.994
IdcServer-14886
ctx_query.result_set   end time:15:23:53.96
search/7
02.19 15:23:53.994
IdcServer-14886
Result parsing start time: 15:23:53.96
search/7
02.19 15:23:53.994
IdcServer-14886
Result parsing   end time: 15:23:53.97
search/7
02.19 15:23:53.994
IdcServer-14886
SELECT dDocName,dDocTitle,dDocType,dSecurityGroup,dInDate,xArchiveFlag,xHidden,xWebsiteObjectType,xWebsiteSection,xDontShowInListsForWebsites,dRevisionID,dDocCreator,dWebExtension,xUpdateContentType,xSubmitForApproval,xFilesAllowed,xRegionDefinition,xWCWorkflowAssignment,dDocCreatedDate,dCreateDate,xWCTags,dOriginalName,xNewsType,dFormat,dPublishType,dDocFunction,dDocAuthor,VaultFileSize,dDocLastModifier,xWebFlag,dOutDate,dGif,dExtension,dDocLastModifiedDate,xClbraRoleList,xInhibitUpdate,URL,AlternateFormat,WebFileSize,xClbraUserList,dDocOwner,xReadOnly,dRevClassID,xWCWorkflowApproverUserList,xCollectionID,xComments,xPartitionId,dRevLabel,xStorageRule,dFullTextFormat,xWebsites,xDocumentSortDate,dRendition2,dRendition1,dID,xReadyForReplication,dDocAccount,xReadMoreURL,xIdcProfile,xClbraAliasList,otsFormat,otsCharset,otsLanguage FROM IdcText2 WHERE dID IN (11489,16132,13513,11319,17043,16477,16162,16010,10524,10777,10508,10476,12427,16333,17080,15926,16857,16895,16487,12431,16813,9569,16814,17045,12246,15911,16775,11925,15639,16865,10100,17116,9015,16474)
search/7
02.19 15:23:53.994
IdcServer-14886
Meta query start time: 15:23:53.97
search/7
02.19 15:23:53.994
IdcServer-14886
Meta query end time:15:23:53.98
>searchquery/6
02.19 15:23:53.995
IdcServer-14886
!csMonitorActiveDbConnections,0
>searchquery/6
02.19 15:23:53.995
IdcServer-14886
Connection is removed from active connections with key of '[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '1' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)''.
>searchquery/6
02.19 15:23:53.995
IdcServer-14886
release pool connection
>searchquery/6
02.19 15:23:54.007
IdcServer-14886
Execution time is 61 ms.
>searchquery/7
02.19 15:23:54.313
IdcServer-14887
Query by [email protected] from CIS
>searchquery/6
02.19 15:23:54.313
IdcServer-14887
preparedQueryText: ( ((xRegionDefinition <matches> `NEWS_REG_DEF`) <and> ((xArchiveFlag <matches> `Yes`) <and> ((xDocumentSortDate>`2014-01-01 00:00:00`) <and> (xDocumentSortDate<`2014-12-31 00:00:00`)))) )
>searchquery/6
02.19 15:23:54.313
IdcServer-14887
Setting substr to other operator conv flag: '( ((xRegionDefinition <matches> `NEWS_REG_DEF`) <and> ((xArchiveFlag <matches> `Yes`) <and> ((xDocumentSortDate>`2014-01-01 00:00:00`) <and> (xDocumentSortDate<`2014-12-31 00:00:00`)))) )'
>searchqueryparse/6
02.19 15:23:54.313
IdcServer-14887
Into parse of UniversalSearchQuery for: ( ((xRegionDefinition <matches> `NEWS_REG_DEF`) <and> ((xArchiveFlag <matches> `Yes`) <and> ((xDocumentSortDate>`2014-01-01 00:00:00`) <and> (xDocumentSortDate<`2014-12-31 00:00:00`)))) )
>searchqueryparse/6
02.19 15:23:54.313
IdcServer-14887
Into parseQueryEx of UniversalSearchQueryParser for queryArr : ( ((xRegionDefinition <matches> `NEWS_REG_DEF`) <and> ((xArchiveFlag <matches> `Yes`) <and> ((xDocumentSortDate>`2014-01-01 00:00:00`) <and> (xDocumentSortDate<`2014-12-31 00:00:00`)))) )
>searchquery/6
02.19 15:23:54.313
IdcServer-14887
Parsing universal query: '( ((xRegionDefinition <matches> `NEWS_REG_DEF`) <and> ((xArchiveFlag <matches> `Yes`) <and> ((xDocumentSortDate>`2014-01-01 00:00:00`) <and> (xDocumentSortDate<`2014-12-31 00:00:00`)))) )'
>searchquery/6
02.19 15:23:54.313
IdcServer-14887
Processing callback on query value 'NEWS_REG_DEF'
>searchqueryparse/6
02.19 15:23:54.313
IdcServer-14887
Into appendClauseElement CommonSearchConfig with operator : equals value : NEWS_REG_DEF
>searchqueryparse/6
02.19 15:23:54.313
IdcServer-14887
Processing actions list size : 1 on the input value : xRegionDefinition with searchengine ORACLETEXTSEARCH
>searchqueryparse/6
02.19 15:23:54.313
IdcServer-14887
Processing action number : 0 : prefix on the input value : xRegionDefinition with searchengine ORACLETEXTSEARCH
>searchqueryparse/6
02.19 15:23:54.313
IdcServer-14887
Processing actions list size : 2 on the input value : NEWS_REG_DEF with searchengine ORACLETEXTSEARCH
>searchqueryparse/6
02.19 15:23:54.314
IdcServer-14887
Processing action number : 0 : upperCase on the input value : NEWS_REG_DEF with searchengine ORACLETEXTSEARCH
>searchqueryparse/6
02.19 15:23:54.314
IdcServer-14887
Processing action number : 1 : escape on the input value : NEWS_REG_DEF with searchengine ORACLETEXTSEARCH
>searchqueryparse/6
02.19 15:23:54.314
IdcServer-14887
Processed escape with '' resulting in value :NEWS_REG_DEF
>searchqueryparse/6
02.19 15:23:54.314
IdcServer-14887
Processed escape with _ resulting in value :NEWS_REG_DEF
>searchqueryparse/6
02.19 15:23:54.314
IdcServer-14887
Processed escape with \- resulting in value :NEWS_REG_DEF
>searchqueryparse/6
02.19 15:23:54.314
IdcServer-14887
Processed escape with \_ resulting in value :NEWS\_REG\_DEF
>searchqueryparse/6
02.19 15:23:54.314
IdcServer-14887
Processed escape with \, resulting in value :NEWS\_REG\_DEF
>searchqueryparse/6
02.19 15:23:54.314
IdcServer-14887
Into appendClauseElement CommonSearchConfig with operator : and value :
>searchquery/6
02.19 15:23:54.314
IdcServer-14887
Processing callback on query value 'Yes'
>searchqueryparse/6
02.19 15:23:54.314
IdcServer-14887
Into appendClauseElement CommonSearchConfig with operator : equals value : Yes
>searchqueryparse/6
02.19 15:23:54.314
IdcServer-14887
Processing actions list size : 1 on the input value : xArchiveFlag with searchengine ORACLETEXTSEARCH
>searchqueryparse/6
02.19 15:23:54.314
IdcServer-14887
Processing action number : 0 : prefix on the input value : xArchiveFlag with searchengine ORACLETEXTSEARCH
>searchqueryparse/6
02.19 15:23:54.314
IdcServer-14887
Processing actions list size : 2 on the input value : Yes with searchengine ORACLETEXTSEARCH
>searchqueryparse/6
02.19 15:23:54.314
IdcServer-14887
Processing action number : 0 : upperCase on the input value : Yes with searchengine ORACLETEXTSEARCH
>searchqueryparse/6
02.19 15:23:54.314
IdcServer-14887
Processing action number : 1 : escape on the input value : YES with searchengine ORACLETEXTSEARCH
>searchqueryparse/6
02.19 15:23:54.314
IdcServer-14887
Processed escape with '' resulting in value :YES
>searchqueryparse/6
02.19 15:23:54.314
IdcServer-14887
Processed escape with _ resulting in value :YES
>searchqueryparse/6
02.19 15:23:54.314
IdcServer-14887
Processed escape with \- resulting in value :YES
>searchqueryparse/6
02.19 15:23:54.314
IdcServer-14887
Processed escape with \_ resulting in value :YES
>searchqueryparse/6
02.19 15:23:54.314
IdcServer-14887
Processed escape with \, resulting in value :YES
>searchqueryparse/6
02.19 15:23:54.314
IdcServer-14887
Into appendClauseElement CommonSearchConfig with operator : and value :
>searchquery/6
02.19 15:23:54.314
IdcServer-14887
Processing callback on query value '2014-01-01 00:00:00'
>searchqueryparse/6
02.19 15:23:54.314
IdcServer-14887
Into appendClauseElement CommonSearchConfig with operator : dateGreater value : 2013/12/31 18:00:00
>searchqueryparse/6
02.19 15:23:54.314
IdcServer-14887
Into appendClauseElement CommonSearchConfig with operator : and value :
>searchquery/6
02.19 15:23:54.314
IdcServer-14887
Processing callback on query value '2014-12-31 00:00:00'
>searchqueryparse/6
02.19 15:23:54.314
IdcServer-14887
Into appendClauseElement CommonSearchConfig with operator : dateLess value : 2014/12/30 18:00:00
>searchquery/6
02.19 15:23:54.314
IdcServer-14887
Converted native query: '((( SDATA(sdxRegionDefinition LIKE 'NEWS\_REG\_DEF') ) and (( SDATA(sdxArchiveFlag LIKE 'YES') ) and (( SDATA(xDocumentSortDate > '2013/12/31 18:00:00') ) and ( SDATA(xDocumentSortDate < '2014/12/30 18:00:00') )))))'
>searchquery/7
02.19 15:23:54.314
IdcServer-14887
assigning connection
>searchquery/6
02.19 15:23:54.314
IdcServer-14887
!csMonitorActiveDbConnections,1
>searchquery/6
02.19 15:23:54.314
IdcServer-14887
Connection is added to active connections with key of '[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '21' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)''.
>searchquery/6
02.19 15:23:54.315
IdcServer-14887
query(live): (((((((((((( SDATA(sdxRegionDefinition LIKE 'NEWS\_REG\_DEF') ) and (( SDATA(sdxArchiveFlag LIKE 'YES') ) and (( SDATA(xDocumentSortDate > '2013/12/31 18:00:00') ) and ( SDATA(xDocumentSortDate < '2014/12/30 18:00:00') )))))))))))))) [1,51] sort(xDocumentSortDate DESC)
>search/6
02.19 15:23:54.365
IdcServer-14887
Start parsing drill down fields with SAX...
>search/6
02.19 15:23:54.367
IdcServer-14887
Completed parsing 1 groups.
>search/7
02.19 15:23:54.369
IdcServer-14887
ResultSetInterface results: <ctx_result_set><hitlist><hit><sdata name="DID">17207</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1004318</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">17281</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1004289</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">17105</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1004316</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">17244</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1004252</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">16997</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1004251</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">17034</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1004233</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">17239</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1004219</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">17178</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1004186</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">17112</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1004150</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">17276</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1004148</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">17193</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1004137</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">17070</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1004132</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">17195</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1004123</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">17275</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1004116</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">17189</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1004080</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">16993</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1004089</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">17032</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1004070</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">16784</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1004035</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">16268</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1-006848</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">16866</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1004028</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">16940</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1004027</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">16823</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1004025</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">16731</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1004024</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">17132</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1004023</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">16645</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1004020</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">16678</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1004002</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">16642</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1004000</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">16610</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1-008921</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">16726</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1003959</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">16663</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1003952</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">15967</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1003823</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">15878</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1003821</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">16277</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1003820</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">15624</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1-008149</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">16178</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1003607</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">16765</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1003764</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">16691</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1003766</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">16827</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1003499</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">16303</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1003498</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">16696</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1003756</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">16937</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1003806</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">15976</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1003381</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">16364</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1003807</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">15832</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1003803</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">17285</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1004041</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">16639</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1003972</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">16820</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1003628</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">15183</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1-007721</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">15180</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1-007720</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">15640</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1-007722</sdata><score>100</score></hit><hit><sdata name="DID">15631</sdata><sdata name="SDDDOCNAME">WCC_CLUSTER1-007719</sdata><score>100</score></hit></hitlist><count>66</count><groups sdata="SDDRILLDOWN"><group value="Document,insight_application1,"><count>66</count></group></groups></ctx_result_set>
>search/7
02.19 15:23:54.369
IdcServer-14887
Trace:
search/7
02.19 15:23:54.369
IdcServer-14887
ctx_query.result_set start time:15:23:54.31
search/7
02.19 15:23:54.369
IdcServer-14887
ctx_query.result_set   end time:15:23:54.32
search/7
02.19 15:23:54.369
IdcServer-14887
Result parsing start time: 15:23:54.33
search/7
02.19 15:23:54.369
IdcServer-14887
Result parsing   end time: 15:23:54.35
search/7
02.19 15:23:54.369
IdcServer-14887
SELECT dDocName,dDocTitle,dDocType,dSecurityGroup,dInDate,xArchiveFlag,xHidden,xWebsiteObjectType,xWebsiteSection,xDontShowInListsForWebsites,dRevisionID,dDocCreator,dWebExtension,xUpdateContentType,xSubmitForApproval,xFilesAllowed,xRegionDefinition,xWCWorkflowAssignment,dDocCreatedDate,dCreateDate,xWCTags,dOriginalName,xNewsType,dFormat,dPublishType,dDocFunction,dDocAuthor,VaultFileSize,dDocLastModifier,xWebFlag,dOutDate,dGif,dExtension,dDocLastModifiedDate,xClbraRoleList,xInhibitUpdate,URL,AlternateFormat,WebFileSize,xClbraUserList,dDocOwner,xReadOnly,dRevClassID,xWCWorkflowApproverUserList,xCollectionID,xComments,xPartitionId,dRevLabel,xStorageRule,dFullTextFormat,xWebsites,xDocumentSortDate,dRendition2,dRendition1,dID,xReadyForReplication,dDocAccount,xReadMoreURL,xIdcProfile,xClbraAliasList,otsFormat,otsCharset,otsLanguage FROM IdcText2 WHERE dID IN (17207,17281,17105,17244,16997,17034,17239,17178,17112,17276,17193,17070,17195,17275,17189,16993,17032,16784,16268,16866,16940,16823,16731,17132,16645,16678,16642,16610,16726,16663,15967,15878,16277,15624,16178,16765,16691,16827,16303,16696,16937,15976,16364,15832,17285,16639,16820,15183,15180,15640,15631)
search/7
02.19 15:23:54.369
IdcServer-14887
Meta query start time: 15:23:54.35
search/7
02.19 15:23:54.369
IdcServer-14887
Meta query end time:15:23:54.35
>searchquery/6
02.19 15:23:54.369
IdcServer-14887
!csMonitorActiveDbConnections,0
>searchquery/6
02.19 15:23:54.369
IdcServer-14887
Connection is removed from active connections with key of '[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '21' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)''.
>searchquery/6
02.19 15:23:54.369
IdcServer-14887
release pool connection
>searchquery/6
02.19 15:23:54.382
IdcServer-14887
Execution time is 69 ms.
>searchquery/7
02.19 15:23:54.662
IdcServer-14888
Query by [email protected] from CIS
>searchquery/6
02.19 15:23:54.662
IdcServer-14888
preparedQueryText: ( ((xRegionDefinition <matches> `NEWS_REG_DEF`) <and> ((xArchiveFlag <matches> `Yes`) <and> ((xDocumentSortDate>`2014-01-01 00:00:00`) <and> (xDocumentSortDate<`2014-12-31 00:00:00`)))) )
>searchquery/6
02.19 15:23:54.662
IdcServer-14888
Setting substr to other operator conv flag: '( ((xRegionDefinition <matches> `NEWS_REG_DEF`) <and> ((xArchiveFlag <matches> `Yes`) <and> ((xDocumentSortDate>`2014-01-01 00:00:00`) <and> (xDocumentSortDate<`2014-12-31 00:00:00`)))) )'
>searchqueryparse/6
02.19 15:23:54.662
IdcServer-14888
Into parse of UniversalSearchQuery for: ( ((xRegionDefinition <matches> `NEWS_REG_DEF`) <and> ((xArchiveFlag <matches> `Yes`) <and> ((xDocumentSortDate>`2014-01-01 00:00:00`) <and> (xDocumentSortDate<`2014-12-31 00:00:00`)))) )
>searchqueryparse/6
02.19 15:23:54.662
IdcServer-14888
Into parseQueryEx of UniversalSearchQueryParser for queryArr : ( ((xRegionDefinition <matches> `NEWS_REG_DEF`) <and> ((xArchiveFlag <matches> `Yes`) <and> ((xDocumentSortDate>`2014-01-01 00:00:00`) <and> (xDocumentSortDate<`2014-12-31 00:00:00`)))) )
>searchquery/6
02.19 15:23:54.662
IdcServer-14888
Parsing universal query:

[Project Server 2010] Maximum Number of Job processor Threads in the queue settings

Hello,
I have a farm with SharePoint 2010 and Project Server 2010 installed. The farm contains:
2 web front end servers
3 application servers
Each servers has 4 processors
The SQL databases are installed on our database servers.
The Microsoft Project Server Queue Service 2010 is started on the 2 web front end servers and on 1 applicative server.
We have two instances of PWA are installed on this farm.
I have calculated that the number of availabe processors we could have on this farm is : 4 processors X 3 application servers (the ones where the project queue is started) = 12. Is that correct? I'm not sure of the definition of the applicaton
server that is used in
this article )
If I set the Maximum Number of Job Processor Threads (in the queue setting) to 2 per queue and per instance. We could have 2 Job processor X 3 application servers X 2 pwa instance = 12 threads to operate at the same time, is it correct?
If yes, do you think this is a too high number of threads?
Thanks for your help
Aline

Hi Aline,
These settings are for fine tuning the servers, and are only one of many performance parameters. If you notice the response from the server is slow, regarding Queues, then I would think about amending these upwards, but also with a careful eye on processor
utilisation. If you up the thread count and the system isn't any more performant, then I would look elsewhere for perf improvements. Before you do anything of course, baseline the performance of the system.
Ben Howard [MVP] | web |
blog |
book | P2O

What are the maximum numbers of parameters that a subvi can be obtained?

What are the maximum numbers of parameters that a subvi can be obtained?

I'm not sure I understand exactly what you mean. Do you mean to ask how many parameters you can pass to a subVI? That would be a very large number because a connector pane can have a dozen or so terminals--and if each terminal is a cluster... You could pass a very large number indeed.
Having said that however, you probibly wouldn't want to. Remember the more parameters you're passing the more tightly coupled your code is--and the less reusable the code will probibly be.
Mike...
Certified Professional Instructor
Certified LabVIEW Architect
LabVIEW Champion
"... after all, He's not a tame lion..."
Be thinking ahead and mark your dance card for NI Week 2015 now: TS 6139 - Object Oriented First Steps

Maximum number of TE tunnels on CRS-3 ?

Hello!
For Juniper MX we have the following:
        head-end     32000
        transit      64000
         tail-end     100000
And what maximum number of these parameters for CRS-3/IOS XR 4.x.x ?

my question is about the actual tested values, not configurable

What is the maximum number of row for a table control in LabWindows/CVI ?

I use LabWindows CVI 8.5.1 (MMI first developped in version 6.0).
In one of our many MMI, a table control contains a list of aircraft parameters.
We can add as many parameters (row) as we want but over 40 000 we observe a crash of the LabWindows CVI runtime.
Our client want to inscrease the number of parameters (row) up to 200 000 !!!
So my questions are:
What is the real maximum number of row for the table control ?
Is this maximum number of row different on LabWindows 2010 version ?
Or is there an other solution ?
Thanks

Greetings,
Can you clarify what you mean by "crash"? Is there an error message thrown? Is it possible that you've consumed all of the available memory?
Please let me know.
Thanks, James Duvall
Product Support Engineer
National Instruments

Maximum number of file/socket descriptors set to 800

Hi
When we are trying to restart opmn services in discover server, it is giving below error.
[disc@odhappstest bin]$ ./opmnctl startall
opmnctl startall: starting opmn and all managed processes...
================================================================================
opmn id=odhappstest:6701
5 of 6 processes started.
ias-instance id=asinst_1
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
ias-component/process-type/process-set:
webcache1/WebCache-admin/WebCache-admin/
Error
--> Process (index=1,uid=1314995949,pid=25917)
failed to start a managed process after the maximum retry limit
Log:
/disc/Oracle/Middleware/asinst_1/diagnostics/logs/WebCache/webcache1/console~WebCache-admin~1.log
The OPMNCTL status showing :
[disc@odhappstest bin]$ opmnctl status
Processes in Instance: asinst_1
--------------------------------------------------------------+---------
ias-component | process-type | pid | status
--------------------------------------------------------------+---------
emagent_asinst_1 | EMAGENT | 25577 | Alive
Discoverer_asinst_1 | PreferenceServer | 25576 | Alive
Discoverer_asinst_1 | ServicesStatus | 25579 | Alive
webcache1 | WebCache-admin | N/A | Down
webcache1 | WebCache | 25580 | Alive
ohs1 | OHS | 25574 | Alive
And we checked in log file and we have found entries as :
Oracle Web Cache 11g (11.1.1.2), Build 11.1.1.2.0 091028.1147
Maximum number of file/socket descriptors set to 800.
Unable to allocate or access a shared memory segment of size 240 bytes. shmget(): Invalid argument
The server process could not initialize.
The server is exiting.
Oracle Web Cache process of ID 16797 exits with code 1 at line 650 of file main.c [label: Build 11.1.1.2.0 091028.1147]
We have applied patch 9262845 to resolve this issue according to MOS documnet :
11G WEBCACHEADMIN FAILS TO START WITH "Unable to allocate or access a shared memory segment" [ID 1057444.1]
But after applying this patch also issue not resolved.
Plz help us to resolve this issue.
Regards
Shaik

Hi Sheik,
I believe it has got something to do with pre-requisites. May be you need to edit the "hard nofile" parameters in /etc/securuty/limits.conf.
Please make sure you have done all the pre-requisites.
Thanks

Windows Azure Active Directory MA - Maximum number of items that can be serialized or deserialized in an object graph is '500000'. Change the object graph or increase the MaxItemsInObjectGraph quota.

Trying to use WAAD with FIM 2010 R2 SP1 (4.1.3496.0) and during export several objects cause a warning/info with:
Maximum number of items that can be serialized or deserialized in an object graph is '500000'. Change the object graph or increase the MaxItemsInObjectGraph quota.
I looked, this appears hard coded into the MA, anyone know what causes this? My best guess is something like a large group membership? Does anyone know what the limits around the WAAD MA are?
Here is the indepth error logged during the failure:
ProvisioningServiceAdapter::ExecuteWithRetry: Action: Export, Attempt: 0, Exception: Microsoft.Online.Coexistence.ProvisionRetryException: Unable to communicate with the Windows Azure Active Directory service. Tracking ID: e94e6020-8434-4aa7-9a29-b2edf7fe6b2e
See the event log for more details. ---> System.ServiceModel.CommunicationException: There was an error while trying to serialize parameter http://schemas.microsoft.com/online/aws/change/2010/01:syncObjects. The InnerException message was 'Maximum number
of items that can be serialized or deserialized in an object graph is '500000'. Change the object graph or increase the MaxItemsInObjectGraph quota. '. Please see InnerException for more details. ---> System.Runtime.Serialization.SerializationException:
Maximum number of items that can be serialized or deserialized in an object graph is '500000'. Change the object graph or increase the MaxItemsInObjectGraph quota.
   at System.Runtime.Serialization.XmlObjectSerializerContext.IncrementItemCount(Int32 count)
   at WriteArrayOfstringToXml(XmlWriterDelegator , Object , XmlObjectSerializerWriteContext , CollectionDataContract )
   at System.Runtime.Serialization.CollectionDataContract.WriteXmlValue(XmlWriterDelegator xmlWriter, Object obj, XmlObjectSerializerWriteContext context)
   at System.Runtime.Serialization.XmlObjectSerializerWriteContext.SerializeAndVerifyType(DataContract dataContract, XmlWriterDelegator xmlWriter, Object obj, Boolean verifyKnownType, RuntimeTypeHandle declaredTypeHandle, Type declaredType)
   at System.Runtime.Serialization.XmlObjectSerializerWriteContext.SerializeWithXsiType(XmlWriterDelegator xmlWriter, Object obj, RuntimeTypeHandle objectTypeHandle, Type objectType, Int32 declaredTypeID, RuntimeTypeHandle declaredTypeHandle, Type
declaredType)
   at System.Runtime.Serialization.XmlObjectSerializerWriteContext.InternalSerialize(XmlWriterDelegator xmlWriter, Object obj, Boolean isDeclaredType, Boolean writeXsiType, Int32 declaredTypeID, RuntimeTypeHandle declaredTypeHandle)
   at System.Runtime.Serialization.XmlObjectSerializerWriteContext.InternalSerializeReference(XmlWriterDelegator xmlWriter, Object obj, Boolean isDeclaredType, Boolean writeXsiType, Int32 declaredTypeID, RuntimeTypeHandle declaredTypeHandle)
   at WriteSyncObjectGroupToXml(XmlWriterDelegator , Object , XmlObjectSerializerWriteContext , ClassDataContract )
   at System.Runtime.Serialization.ClassDataContract.WriteXmlValue(XmlWriterDelegator xmlWriter, Object obj, XmlObjectSerializerWriteContext context)
   at System.Runtime.Serialization.XmlObjectSerializerWriteContext.SerializeAndVerifyType(DataContract dataContract, XmlWriterDelegator xmlWriter, Object obj, Boolean verifyKnownType, RuntimeTypeHandle declaredTypeHandle, Type declaredType)
   at System.Runtime.Serialization.XmlObjectSerializerWriteContext.SerializeWithXsiType(XmlWriterDelegator xmlWriter, Object obj, RuntimeTypeHandle objectTypeHandle, Type objectType, Int32 declaredTypeID, RuntimeTypeHandle declaredTypeHandle, Type
declaredType)
   at System.Runtime.Serialization.XmlObjectSerializerWriteContext.InternalSerialize(XmlWriterDelegator xmlWriter, Object obj, Boolean isDeclaredType, Boolean writeXsiType, Int32 declaredTypeID, RuntimeTypeHandle declaredTypeHandle)
   at System.Runtime.Serialization.XmlObjectSerializerWriteContext.InternalSerializeReference(XmlWriterDelegator xmlWriter, Object obj, Boolean isDeclaredType, Boolean writeXsiType, Int32 declaredTypeID, RuntimeTypeHandle declaredTypeHandle)
   at WriteArrayOfSyncObjectToXml(XmlWriterDelegator , Object , XmlObjectSerializerWriteContext , CollectionDataContract )
   at System.Runtime.Serialization.CollectionDataContract.WriteXmlValue(XmlWriterDelegator xmlWriter, Object obj, XmlObjectSerializerWriteContext context)
   at System.Runtime.Serialization.DataContractSerializer.InternalWriteObjectContent(XmlWriterDelegator writer, Object graph, DataContractResolver dataContractResolver)
   at System.Runtime.Serialization.DataContractSerializer.InternalWriteObject(XmlWriterDelegator writer, Object graph, DataContractResolver dataContractResolver)
   at System.Runtime.Serialization.XmlObjectSerializer.WriteObjectHandleExceptions(XmlWriterDelegator writer, Object graph, DataContractResolver dataContractResolver)
   at System.ServiceModel.Dispatcher.DataContractSerializerOperationFormatter.SerializeParameterPart(XmlDictionaryWriter writer, PartInfo part, Object graph)
   --- End of inner exception stack trace ---
Server stack trace:
   at System.ServiceModel.Dispatcher.DataContractSerializerOperationFormatter.SerializeParameterPart(XmlDictionaryWriter writer, PartInfo part, Object graph)
   at System.ServiceModel.Dispatcher.DataContractSerializerOperationFormatter.SerializeParameter(XmlDictionaryWriter writer, PartInfo part, Object graph)
   at System.ServiceModel.Dispatcher.DataContractSerializerOperationFormatter.SerializeParameters(XmlDictionaryWriter writer, PartInfo[] parts, Object[] parameters)
   at System.ServiceModel.Dispatcher.DataContractSerializerOperationFormatter.SerializeBody(XmlDictionaryWriter writer, MessageVersion version, String action, MessageDescription messageDescription, Object returnValue, Object[] parameters, Boolean
isRequest)
   at System.ServiceModel.Dispatcher.OperationFormatter.OperationFormatterMessage.OperationFormatterBodyWriter.OnWriteBodyContents(XmlDictionaryWriter writer)
   at System.ServiceModel.Channels.Message.OnWriteMessage(XmlDictionaryWriter writer)
   at System.ServiceModel.Channels.BufferedMessageWriter.WriteMessage(Message message, BufferManager bufferManager, Int32 initialOffset, Int32 maxSizeQuota)
   at System.ServiceModel.Channels.BinaryMessageEncoderFactory.BinaryMessageEncoder.WriteMessage(Message message, Int32 maxMessageSize, BufferManager bufferManager, Int32 messageOffset)
   at System.ServiceModel.Channels.HttpOutput.SerializeBufferedMessage(Message message)
   at System.ServiceModel.Channels.HttpOutput.Send(TimeSpan timeout)
   at System.ServiceModel.Channels.HttpChannelFactory`1.HttpRequestChannel.HttpChannelRequest.SendRequest(Message message, TimeSpan timeout)
   at System.ServiceModel.Channels.RequestChannel.Request(Message message, TimeSpan timeout)
   at System.ServiceModel.Channels.ServiceChannel.Call(String action, Boolean oneway, ProxyOperationRuntime operation, Object[] ins, Object[] outs, TimeSpan timeout)
   at System.ServiceModel.Channels.ServiceChannelProxy.InvokeService(IMethodCallMessage methodCall, ProxyOperationRuntime operation)
   at System.ServiceModel.Channels.ServiceChannelProxy.Invoke(IMessage message)
Exception rethrown at [0]:
   at System.Runtime.Remoting.Proxies.RealProxy.HandleReturnMessage(IMessage reqMsg, IMessage retMsg)
   at System.Runtime.Remoting.Proxies.RealProxy.PrivateInvoke(MessageData& msgData, Int32 type)
   at Microsoft.Online.Coexistence.Schema.IProvisioningWebService.Provision(SyncObject[] syncObjects)
   at Microsoft.Online.Coexistence.ProvisionHelper.InvokeAwsAPI[T](Func`1 awsOperation, String opsLabel)
   --- End of inner exception stack trace ---
   at Microsoft.Online.Coexistence.ProvisionHelper.CommunicationExceptionHandler(CommunicationException ex)
   at Microsoft.Online.Coexistence.ProvisionHelper.InvokeAwsAPI[T](Func`1 awsOperation, String opsLabel)
   at Microsoft.Azure.ActiveDirectory.Connector.ProvisioningServiceAdapter.<>c__DisplayClass1.<Export>b__0()
   at Microsoft.Azure.ActiveDirectory.Connector.ProvisioningServiceAdapter.ExecuteWithRetry(String actionName, Action action).

Hi gdedshg,
>>Maximum number of items that can be serialized or deserialized in an object graph is '65536'. Change the object graph or increase the MaxItemsInObjectGraph quota
When meet the above exception, please try to do the following configuration:
On the server side:
Add the following to the server's config file:
<behaviors>
<serviceBehaviors>
<behavior name="MyServiceBehavior">
<dataContractSerializer
maxItemsInObjectGraph="2147483647" />
</behavior>
</serviceBehaviors>
</behaviors>
And reference it in the service using the following code:
<services>
<service
behaviorConfiguration="MyServiceBehavior"
name="serviceName">……
On the client side:
Add the following:
<behaviors>
<endpointBehaviors>
<behavior name="MyClientbehavior">
<dataContractSerializer
maxItemsInObjectGraph="2147483647"/>
</behavior>
</endpointBehaviors>
</behaviors>
And reference it in the endpoint using the following code:
<endpoint address="serviceAddress"
behaviorConfiguration="MyClientbehavior"
For more information, please try to refer to the following article:
http://blog.aggregatedintelligence.com/2011/01/wcf-maxitemsinobjectgraph-error.html .
Best Regards,
Amy Peng
We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
Click
HERE to participate the survey.

Increasing the maximum number of sessions

Hi,
I am working on a web application which requires 3000 concurrent users as a part of the NFR and almost all of them would trigger operations which would require DB hits. Hence my Oracle server (10g) needs to support at least 3000 sessions. I checked the value in the V$parameter. Currently the value for sessions and process is set to 170.
I guess to increase the value i would need to change it in the init ora file and restart the DB. I have the following doubts -
1. What would be the basic system configuration (for the server machine) to support 3000 sessions?
2. What are the other related parameters which need to changed? What values need to be set for the same and how do we calculate the same. Is there any model which can be used for calculations purposes.
3. Are there any in built mechanisms supported by Oracle to handle such high load? I presume there should be available and i am blissfully unaware about of it !
Request you to kindly guide me accordingly. Any help / pointers are greatly appreciated !!
Thanks & Regards,
Sriram

The problem i face is if i limit the pool size to 300; then there is a good probability that while 3000 users access the application simultaneously reposes will be greatly delayed as the connections would be used up. This would affect the NFR.
Also setting the increment value for the pool does not help pas the server limits the maximum number of connections. I am simultaneously checking the code to ensure that there is no connection leak. As this might also aggravate the probelm. On initial analysis i do not find any such issues.
I am also parallely looking into the design to check if any of the frequently used data can be cached on the application server to improve performance and reduce the number of DB hits.
Hope i am on the right track. Do let know your thoughts and suggestions.
Thanks a lot for highlighting the issue.
Thanks & Regards,
Sriram

Maximum number of connections that database can make

Dear All,
I have a problem regarding maximum number of database connections that can be handled .
Theoretically i am aware that the number of sessions we set in init ora settings tells me the maximum
connections that can be opened.but this number will be also be dependent on the capability of the OS to handle the sessions.
is there any way i can analyse the number of possible connections possible if I have the OS memory and CPU parameters with me
Regards

http://books.google.com/books?id=TmPoYfpeJAUC&pg=PA129&lpg=PA129&dq=.5mb+for+each+db+session+oracle&source=web&ots=RzRe2s2AYy&sig=zmO-RBoCEuWQzaZhOIN122Serzk&hl=en&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=5&ct=result#PPA122,M1.
This is from expert oracle database architecture by tom kytes and I personally ran some queries to confirm that.
Edited by: OrionNet on Nov 30, 2008 11:51 PM

Maximum Number of Parameters

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for