MBAM 2.5 integration broke my Primary Site Server - Managment Point http status code 404, not found

I uninstalled MBAM 2.0 and installed MBAM 2.5. During 2.5 installation there was this one section to enter "Web service application pool domain account", where I entered domain admin account. I don´t know if that has any effect on this problem.
Though, situation now is that my site is now out of order because of Management Point cannot connect to IIS or something like that.
In status messages I see "MP Control Manager detected management point is not responding to HTTP requests. The HTTP status code and text is 404, Not Found. Message ID 5436".
In mpcontrol.log I see Call to HttpSendRequestSync failed for port 80 with status code 404, text: Not Found
I have tried:
Bindings checked, that http uses port 80
MP component is uninstalled and reinstalled succsessfully
Primary site server has restarted several times
In IIS, Default Site -> SMS_MP->Basic Settings I did "Test Settings". With pass-through authentification it cannot Access the D:\SMS_CCM path, I changed to the domain admin, and it succseed. I have no idea, does this have something to do
with it.

I have experienced all the above problems also and they can be a pain to fix. I guess the moral of the story is (as Andy says) leave the ConfigMgr server alone. If you want an MBAM server then build an MBAM server.
Gerry Hampson | Blog:
www.gerryhampsoncm.blogspot.ie | LinkedIn:
Gerry Hampson | Twitter:
@gerryhampson
Hmm, I guess ConfMgr integration will not be the problem if your MP is using http(80) and MBAM will use https(443). If you then set spn to https, it will use 443 as-is, right? But other custom ports might be the problem?

Similar Messages

I am trying to browse the web but this meesage keeps popping up everytime I enter the site I would like to go in 404 Not Found nginx

Question
I am trying to browse the web but this meesage keeps popping up everytime I enter the site I would like to go in/ 404 Not Found nginx edit

There are 2 versions of Adobe Flash:
*the Plugin version for Firefox and most other browsers
*the ActiveX version only for IE (see: [[ActiveX]])
*When updating, you need to update '''both'''
You do not have the Plugin version installed for Firefox. Look for "Shockwave Flash" in Tools > Add-ons > Plugins
#'''Install the [[Managing the Flash plugin|Flash]] plugin''' to the latest version.
#*Download and SAVE to your Desktop so you can find the installer later
#*If you do not have the current version, click on the "Player Download Center" link on the "'''Download and information'''" or "'''Download Manual installers'''" below
#*After download is complete, exit Firefox
#*Click on the installer you just downloaded and install
#**Windows 7 and Vista: may need to right-click the installer and choose "Run as Administrator"
#*Start Firefox and check your version again or test the installation by going back to the download link below
#*'''Download and information''': http://www.adobe.com/software/flash/about/
#**Use Firefox to go to the above site to update the Firefox plugin (will also install plugin for most other browsers; except IE)
#**Use IE to go to the above site to update the IE ActiveX
#*'''Download Manual installers'''.
#**http://kb2.adobe.com/cps/191/tn_19166.html#main_ManualInstaller
#**Note separate links for:
#***Plugin for Firefox and most other browsers
#***ActiveX for IE

HTTP Response code 404 - RFC Adapter des not connect to Integration engine

Hi,
I seem to have problem with XI Integration engine. My integration process does not go beyond adapter engine and it fails with the following error,
Begining of the erorr report -
2006-01-23 13:35:53 Success RFC adapter received sRFC for ZSCEN2_XI from <sysno>/<client>. Attempting to send message synchronously
2006-01-23 13:35:54 Success Application attempting to send an XI message synchronously using connection AFW.
2006-01-23 13:35:55 Success Trying to put the message into the call queue.
2006-01-23 13:35:55 Success Message successfully put into the queue.
2006-01-23 13:35:55 Success The message was successfully retrieved from the call queue.
2006-01-23 13:35:55 Success The message status set to DLNG.
2006-01-23 13:35:55 Error Returning synchronous error notification to calling application: Received HTTP response code 404 : Not Found.
2006-01-23 13:35:55 Error Transmitting the message using connection http://<host>:55300/sap/xi/engine?type=entry failed, due to: Received HTTP response code 404 : Not Found.
2006-01-23 13:35:55 Error The message status set to FAIL.
2006-01-23 13:35:55 Error Returning to application. Exception: Received HTTP response code 404 : Not Found
end of error report -
and the runtime workbench does not connect to Integration engine and fails with the following error,
begin error report -
javax.ejb.CreateException: Unable to log on to system XID in language en with user XIRWBUSER
     at com.sap.aii.mdt.server.integrationengine.IntegrationEngineMonitoringBean.ejbCreate(IntegrationEngineMonitoringBean.java:374)
     at com.sap.aii.mdt.server.IntegrationEngineHomeImpl10.create(IntegrationEngineHomeImpl10.java:185)
     at com.sap.aii.mdt.server.IntegrationEngineHome_Stub.create(IntegrationEngineHome_Stub.java:56)
end of report -
Have anyone experienced the same issue?. Are we missing some post installation configuration?.
Thanks in advance
Regards,
Arul

HI Anulraja,
Your Adapter Engine searches the pipeline url of the integration engine from the SLD.
Check the Bussiness System in Sld , which you'll have defined for XI Server.
It should have ROLE : Integration Server And
pipeline url: http://ux0800:55300/sap/xi/engine?type=entry
should be this if your http port is 55300.
Check if this url is right in SLD-Bussiness System.
You can check the exact http port in transaction sxmb_adm.
Go to Integration engine configuration and then click on check icon(F7).
It should match with that provided in the BS in SLD.
By default it should be 8000.
Check all these things and then try.
Regards,
Yomesh

SCCM CAS & Primary Site Server - Same SQL Database and Reporting Instance

Hi Fellows,
I need to know whether, for SCCM CAS, a dedicated/seperate SQL instance for SCCM CAS a mendatory requirement or recommendation?
Or we can use the same SQL instance used by Primary Site Server?
J.A

There no technical reason not to have the CAS and Primary database in separate instances of the same remote SQL server. However if you are going to deploy a CAS that would suggest a very large number of clients and a very busy infrastructure. In that case
I would RECOMMEND separate SQL servers.
This is a good guide for SQL sizing (but it is only a guide)
http://blog.coretech.dk/kea/system-center-2012-configuration-manager-sql-recommendations/
Gerry Hampson | Blog:
www.gerryhampsoncm.blogspot.ie | LinkedIn:
Gerry Hampson | Twitter:
@gerryhampson

Integrating Google Maps in Oracle Apex and 404 Not found error page

Currently using APEX version 3.2.0.00.27 installed in OracleXE version 10.2.0.1.0. Have been attempting to recreate some examples of Google Maps within APEX. Found a nice set of examples here that build up to what I'm looking to ultimately do by incorporating google maps into APEX:
http://blog.whitehorses.nl/2009/10/04/integrating-google-maps-in-oracle-apex/
Unfortunatly, I'm getting the "404 Not Found, Not found, The requested URL /apex/wwv_flow.accept was not found on this server" page when I try to recreate the "Map with Search" example. I'd like to see if this really works using the html input and button tags in the body/region source versus creating APEX items to pass the address values to the javascript in the html header of the apex page. I'm thinking it's just an html thing within APEX that you have to do it a certain way, but I haven't managed to hit that magic combination. have gone to the google maps api v2 and looked at the html they use (it's what these examples with apex are based on) and tried that just to see. Same 404 result.
I've seen suggestions at this forum and elsewhere that the 404 error is due to a bug. have been to metalink, and really haven't seen anything that spells out what the bug is and how to patch it or work around it. May be I just haven't found the right note/doc yet. have seen suggestions to change something associated with the Anonymous account that APEX uses. Have turned on authentication in the application to use an APEX user account with a logon page to the application. Still get the 404. Although, I have not adjusted anything elsewhere, like a DADS config file, because the apex/xe configuration is using the plsql gateway. Not sure of any procedure for changing settings on anonymous account when using plsql gateway.
Open to suggestions. APEX 3.2 is customer version, so going to 4 may not be an option yet. XE, on the other hand, can certainly be swapped for an 11g version standard or enterprise edition if need be. I don't think this is a db version problem though. I think it's more on the APEX side of things.
Anyway, any help or suggestions are appreciated.
thanks
rtp
Edited by: RTP on Jun 24, 2011 10:30 AM

Hi I have the same problem.... if you found the solution, please put it here to see it... I need a solution to this its urgent!!
Thanks!!

Using a custom certificate store for SCCM 2012 clients and primary site server

I have read what seems to be all the pki related documentation out there for SCCM 2012. I have a PKI infrastructure up and running issueing certificates with an offline root through group policy autoenrollment. The problem that i'm faced with is we are migrating
from SCCM 2007 that was in native mode and we chose not to use the CA that we used for the old SCCM environment. When the clients attempt to communicate with the M.P. it runs through all of the different certificates and adds a tremendous amount of overhead
to the M.P. We will have ten's of thousands of clients by migration end. Could someone please point me to a document that goes over how to leverage a custom certificate store that I could then tell the new 2012 environment to use? I know that it's in there,
I've seen it in the console. The setup is one primary site server with SQL on box and the pki I just mentioned as well as the old 2007 environment that is still live.
I read that you can try and use SAN as a method of identifying the new certs but I haven't found a good document covering exactly how that works. Any info you could provide I would be very grateful for. Thanks.

Jason, thank you for your reply. I'm getting the impression that you have never been in the situation where you had to deal with 2 different PKI environments. Let me state that I understand what your saying about trust. We have to configure the trusted root
CA via GPO. That simply isn't enough, and I have a valid example to backup this claim. When the new clients got the advertisement and began the ccmsetup process I used the /pki switch among others. What the client end up doing was selecting a certificate that
had the longest validity period which was issued by our old CA. It checked the authentication chain, found it to be valid and selected it for communication. At that point the installation failed, period, no caveats as you say. The reason the install failed
because the new PKI infrastructure is integrated into the new environment, and the old is not. So when you said " that
are trusted and they can use *any* cert that is trusted because at the end of the day, there is no
difference between two valid certs that have the same purpose as long as they are trusted. "
that is not correct. Both certs are trusted, and use the same certificate template, but only one certificate would allow the install to complete successfully.
Once I started using the CCMCERTISSUERS
switch the client install went swimmingly. The only reason I'm still debating this point is because someone might read this thread see your comments and assume "well I've got my new PKI configured as a trusted root CA, I should be all set" and their
deployment will fail, just as my pilot did.
About Intune I'm looking forward to doing a POC in the lab i built with my Note 3. I'm hoping it goes well as I really want to have our MDM migrated into ConfigMgr... I think the
biggest obstacle outside of selling it to management will be the actual device migration from the current MDM solution. From what I understand of the enrollment process manual install and config is the only path forward.
Thanks Jason for your post and discussion.

Client Agent installation on SCCM Primary Site Server

Hello,
I Installed Client agent via Client push to my SCCM Primary Site. Installation was sucessfull (Return code 0 in ccmsetup.log). But in console still the client status shows 'NO'.
Is there any difference when installing Client agent on Primary Site or any other site server. Please advice.
Regards,
Vishnu
V I S H N U

Thank you Torsten, Got the log files.
ClientLocation.log: - All things seems fine here. Got assigned to correct Site code.
But found the below errors in other two logs.
ccmmessaging.log
Raising event:
instance of CCM_CcmHttp_Status
ClientID = "GUID:BFD290FF-1A90-4863-8304-EAA205D6EC20";
DateTime = "20150128053734.123000+000";
HostName = "QVDCSCM01.QDOM.GLOBAL";
HRESULT = "0x00000000";
ProcessID = 9048;
StatusCode = 0;
ThreadID = 11052;
CcmMessaging 28/01/2015 05:37:34 11052 (0x2B2C)
No reply message from Server. Server may be temporarily down or a transient network error. CcmMessaging 28/01/2015 05:37:34 11052 (0x2B2C)
Post to http://QVDCSCM01.QDOM.GLOBAL/ccm_system/request failed with 0x8000000a. CcmMessaging 28/01/2015 05:37:34 11052 (0x2B2C)
LocationServices.log
Failed to send management point list Location Request Message to QVDCSCM01.QDOM.GLOBAL LocationServices 28/01/2015 05:37:34 11052 (0x2B2C)
Persisted Default Management Point Locations locally LocationServices 28/01/2015 05:37:34 11052 (0x2B2C)
Current AD site of machine is Default-First-Site-Name LocationServices 28/01/2015 05:37:34 11052 (0x2B2C)
Failed to send management point list Location Request Message to QVDCSCM01.QDOM.GLOBAL LocationServices 28/01/2015 05:37:34 11052 (0x2B2C)
Attempting to retrieve local MPs from the assigned MP LocationServices 28/01/2015 05:37:34 11052 (0x2B2C)
Current AD site of machine is Default-First-Site-Name LocationServices 28/01/2015 05:37:34 11052 (0x2B2C)
Failed to send management point list Location Request Message to QVDCSCM01.QDOM.GLOBAL LocationServices 28/01/2015 05:37:34 11052 (0x2B2C)
Current AD site of machine is Default-First-Site-Name LocationServices 28/01/2015 05:37:34 11052 (0x2B2C)
Current AD site of machine is Default-First-Site-Name LocationServices 28/01/2015 05:37:34 11052 (0x2B2C)
Executing Task LSRefreshDefaultMPTask LocationServices 28/01/2015 05:37:45 1188 (0x04A4)
V I S H N U

Can we assign 2 IPs for a SCCM 2012 primary site server and use 1 IP for communicating with its 2 DPs and 2nd one for communicating with its upper hierarchy CAS which is in a different .Domain

Hi,
Can we assign 2 IPs for a SCCM 2012 primary site server and use 1 Ip for communicating with its 2 DPs and 2nd one for communicating with its upper hierarchy CAS . ?
Scenario: We are building 1 SCCM 2012 primary site and 2 DPs in one domain . In future this will attach to a CAS server which is in different domain. Can we assign 2 IPs in Primary site server , one IP will use to communicate with its 2 DPs and second
IP for communicating with the CAS server which is in a different domain.?
Details:
1)Server : Windows 2012 R2 Std , VM environment .2) SCCM : SCCM 2012 R2 .3)SQL: SQL 2012 Std
Thanks
Rajesh Vasudevan

First, it's not possible. You cannot attach a primary site to an existing CAS.
Primary sites in 2012 are *not* the same as primary sites in 2007 and a CAS is 2012 is completely different from a central primary site in 2007.
CASes cannot manage clients. Also, primary sites are *not* used for delegation in 2012. As Torsten points out, multiple primary sites are used for scale-out (in terms of client count) only. Placing primary sites for different organizational units provides
no functional differences but does add complexity, latency, and additional failure points.
Thus, as the others have pointed out, your premise for doing this is completely incorrect. What are your actual business goals?
As for the IP Addressing, that depends upon your networking infrastructure. There is no way to configure ConfigMgr to use different interfaces for different types of traffic. You could potentially manipulate the routing tables in Windows but that's asking
for trouble IMO.
Jason | http://blog.configmgrftw.com | @jasonsandys

Replacing the primary site server, SCCM 2012 R2

Hi,
Setup is currently SCCM 2012 R2 with the primary site server on Windows 2008 R2 on a Hyper-V VM with a separate physical SQL server on 2008 R2 (Windows and SQL). I'm not making any changes to the SQL server at this stage.
I want to completely replace the primary site server VM completely with a brand new VM using Windows 2012 R2.
I was looking to run the SCCM setup and using the Expand an existing stand-alone primary into a hierarchy option but it wont let me do that due to "The site code you specified should not be the same as the primary site's site code".
So seems this Expand an existing option isn't the right option for me?
Do I just add the new server in the SCCM console and add all roles and test and then delete the roles from the old server?
Thanks
EDIT: I have 7 Secondary sites, so I dont want to just start over by doing some sort of backup and restore to the new server unless someone can tell me that wont break my hierarchy.

a backup and recovery is the correct way to do this, but there are a few things you should keep in mind.
Do a backup of your current environment and shut everything down.
install new vm, ensure the configuration is identical, (dns, hostname, etc...); install the same software and pre-requisites,
do a recovery
check the following links on how to do a backup and restore:
http://www.windows-noob.com/forums/index.php?/topic/7403-how-can-i-backup-system-center-2012-configuration-manager/
and
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/gg712697.aspx

Running WMI repair script on SCCM 2012 primary site server

Hi,
running WMI rebuilding repository script on SCCM 2012 primary site server. Any idea what kind of issue on SCCM environment it will cause.
Regards,
Gopi

Gah! did you already do so? I hope your resume is up to date. As to what kind of issues: it'll break everything, and nothing will ever work right ever again. Ever. Again.
Standardize. Simplify. Automate.

SCCM 2012 Primary Site server is piling up so huge

Hello Folks,
We recently implemented SCCM in our environment for a month ago. Its a stand-alone primary site model running DB on the primary site server itself. But, have segregated the drives for content, DB, and C drive for holding up the SCCM server related
installations. I haven't noticed the data growth on the server, as a result the C drive ran out of space yesterday and increased 40 GB more than the earlier. As of now, C drive has about 120 gb in total and there is only 25% left on whereas it had 33%
after expanding to 120 GB. When digging through the blogs, I doubted it could be BAD MIF inbox folder(screenshot attached), so went ahead and ran space check on the server, and looks like the major % of drive space is being occupied by the inbox folder and
also it is increasing day by day. I need further more directions on how this can be monitored to find out growth % and fix this.
I checked basic stuffs like clearing up profile & recycle bin data and any of this kind.
Step by step guide in detail should be more helpful in this regard. And, I hope this should be helpful for a larger SCCM admin crowd like me in the universe.
I also want to know what are the settings in SCCM console associates with these folders so that the settings can be streamlined to match the best practices (like inventory schedule for every 1 week & software inventory best practices) if at all, if we
have enabled in the implementation phase to receive fast & large results.
Thanks, V@s!m

We are seeing a stable disk size nowadays.
With that hopefully, this is a time to sum up the actions taken.
1. SCCM 2012 implemented a couple of months ago.
2. During the implementation phase, Client & Discovery settings were enabled to be quite an aggressive schedules to get good amount of results in a short period.
3. Implementation had been successfully completed and the system was running just fine until I noticed the space crunch
4. I thought it was normal and increased the disk space by 50% which got ate up in a couple of days and that's when I started suspecting about something is going wrong
5. As an interim solution, have increased the disk space by 70% and started troubleshooting the SCCM buddy.
6. Discovery settings were brought down to not to be aggressive (but this wasn't the issue) - still the issue was going on
7. Inventory settings were too brought down to be nominal (Useful :
http://www.informit.com/articles/article.aspx?p=1912064&seqNum=8)
8. By this time, I brought my colleague who was involved during the Implementation. We did the clean-up on server, went through the Inbox\Auth folders and were trying to figure out still what is going wrong.
9. We couldn't notice much improvement about the situation though we gave enough time for each and every fix that we applied.
10. Through some warnings and errors in the site system status, remembered that the 'Configuration.mof' was modified for testing some customized inventory classes, during the implementation phase which was getting mismatched data from lot of different clients.
- "Potential cause figured out"
11. Replaced the original Configuration.mof, and we started noticing big differences - the space was no more increasing.
12. Still we could see lot of old files in sub-folders of Inbox\Auth folder, we hope all these files would try to process for the information that we added in the 'Configuration.mof' > will fail > will go to respective 'Bad/Corrupt' folders and
eventually will be removed as per the clean-up cycle.
I will update the thread if anything goes wrong beyond this point. But, we believe it wouldn't as we have found the culprit and fixed.
**** I appreciate all your responses to help me with this situation. Happy SCCMing..!
Thanks, V@s!m

Package content on Primary Site Server (no Distribution Point Role)

Hey,
I have the situation that there are 3 Servers with following roles installed:
1.File Server
2.SCCM 2012 R2 CU3 Primary Site Server / Database Server (Was a distribution Point previously to update to CU3)
3.Distribution Point
Our packages are all stored as "source" on the File Server.
Now some SCCM Applications / packages are created and distributed to the distribution point.
Unfortunately on the Primary Site Server the folder "SCCMContendLib" extends as it does on the distribution point (so this means that all packages are distributed to the primary site server, too.
My question is now- why? :)
Is this really needed (I see no reason for it) or is it a problem in the infrastructure (if yes - how can I resolve it)?
Thank you for help
Kind Regards

Not a problem with your infrastructure. What you're describing it the default behavior for ConfigMgr, in terms of storing content on the primary.
-Nick O.

Move SCCMContentLib on Primary Site Server to a separate drive?

With ConfigMgr 2012 SP1 Primary Site Server, do you usually leave SCCMContentLib and related directories on the drive you install ConfigMgr to, or do you move them to their own drive? I'm trying to figure out the best way to handle that before I
do the install.

Just to further clarify this point. if I have a C and a D drive, I install configmgr on C, it seems like I get the SCCMContentLib on C. In the past I have moved it to D which is possible.
Are you saying that if D has more free space than C, the install automatically places the ConfigMgr content lib on D?
If I use the non_SMS file on C and point the CM2012 installation to C, what happens? I was going to try that to see if the content lib was then installed on D.
It just seems like it is confusing to get the primary site's SCCMContentLib on D when CM is installed on C?

Database instance for SCCM 2012 and WSUS on a single primary site server

I am going to install SCCM 2012 and its SQL database on a single physical server. This is going to be a single primary site server. The default SQL instance will be dedicated to SCCM 2012 with no other named instances to be added on the SQL server down
the road.
During the WSUS server role installation, there is the Database Options page asking for using (1) Windows Internal Database, (2) existing db server on this computer, or (3) an external db server.
Since SCCM 2012 doesn't share db instance with others, how should I handle the WSUS db that's going to be hosted on the same SCCM/SQL physical server? Do I really need to create a separate SQL instance just for the WSUS db?
Thanks and regards.

Even though you can do it, it is the best practice to have SCCM 2012 and WSUS installed on separate instances.
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh692394
When the Configuration Manager and WSUS databases use the same SQL Server and share the same instance of SQL Server, you cannot easily determine the resource usage between the two applications. When you use a different SQL Server instance
for Configuration Manager and WSUS, it is easier to troubleshoot and diagnose resource usage issues that might occur for each application.

Is it safe to re-install console on primary site server?

While trying to upgrade the Package Conversion Manager utility, and in removing the pre-SP1 version, I seem to have broken the console installed on our primary site server. On opening it crashes every time; a repair ran through but hasn't helped.
Is it safe to uninstall the console application and reinstall it?
Thanks
Bob

Yes; this should not cause any issues.
Torsten Meringer | http://www.mssccmfaq.de

MBAM 2.5 integration broke my Primary Site Server - Managment Point http status code 404, not found

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for