ME27 behaving different for different accounting types?

Hey Team ABAP,
we got a custom report called "returns monitor", from which you can do different things.
One of those things is to transpose actual selected line into a rearrangement.
This worked quite fine till today.
Today we have new entries in our returns monitor with accounting type 'R'.
I build a batch input map to create the document in ME27.
I give accounting information like following:
      PERFORM new_dynpro USING 'SAPLKACB' '0002'.
      PERFORM setzen     USING ' ' 'COBL-KDAUF' <ls_ret>-vbeln.
      PERFORM setzen     USING ' ' 'COBL-KDPOS' <ls_ret>-vbelp.
      PERFORM setzen     USING ' ' 'BDC_OKCODE' '/00'.
if we got accountings type M it works, while if accounting type is R the ME27 tells me that istill need to give accounting information.
So for me it seems you need to give accounting information in a different way when we have accounting type R.
Any Ideas expieriences on this?

Hi,
I suggest you post the same question in functional forums where you will get the business flow regarding this.
Regards,
Keshav

Similar Messages

What are all the different account types?

What are all the different account types?
What is variance reporting?
Where you create exchange rate table?

Essbase provides two variance reporting properties—expense and non-expense. The default is non-expense. Variance reporting properties define how
Essbase calculates the difference between actual and budget data in members with the @VAR or @VARPER function in their member formulas.
When you tag a member as expense, the @VAR function calculates Budget - Actual.
For example, if the budgeted amount is $100 and the actual amount is $110, the variance is -10.
Without the expense reporting tag, the @VAR function calculates Actual - Budget. For example, if the budgeted amount is $100 and the actual amount is $110, the variance is 10

Accidentally trashed mailplist for builtin account types

Hi
I accidentally trashed the plist file from /library/mail/account types/.com.builtin.mail accounts.
I believe this file is required for automatically setting up email accounts in mail can anyone please tell me how to get the plist file without doing a reinstall.

You are correct as to that the file is required for automatically setting up mail accounts. Here is how to get it back.
1. Download a copy of Pacifist from http://www.charlessoft.com/
2. Open Pacifist
3. Insert your Leopard Install Disc, and click open Apple Install Disks and select the DVD you inserted
4. After it loads, use the search bar to search for the missing file (typing com.apple.builtin will find it).
5. Click install in upper left corner and type your password.
That's it! The file has been replaced! And if you were running Time Machine, imagine how much easier that would have been! Hope this works for you!

Maintaining different values for Accounting Type (KOART)

Hi experts,
I have several accounting tcodes such as FBV0, FB03, FB08, FV65,FV60 in one parent role.
FV60, FV65 are added to this role as FBV0 is checking internally for this authorization object.
All these tcodes share a same object F_BKPF_KOA which differ by activity and the accounting type (KOART).
The KOART field is an org level field defined by SAP and I have entered D,K,S as values.
But the auth object values should be different for the accounting types.
i.e 03 for D,K,S
01,02,03,77 for S
03,77 for K
All the derived/child roles for this parent should also have the same document type as the parent. How can I achieve this as this object is maintained at the org level.
I could not delete this obj from being an org level element as it is defined by SAP.
Appreciate your response.
Thanks
Kee

> If KOART is an org field you cannot differentiate between authorized activities for each of the KOART values in one role. Whether you maintain values in the parent or not only matters if you're planning to assign the parent roles to users or if you just use them as templates.
>
Parent Roles should not be assigned to any users. It should only be used as Template to grant and control Non-Organization Level authorizations centrally (you can see these option in Parent roles). Concept of Parent-Child role is to avoid creating same roles where all authorization field values are exactly same and differs only for Organization Values (different Site / Branch Office specific constants). So we can maintain the Org. levels as different sets for a single Parent role as I already explained.
For more details: Note#314513 - PFCG: Maintaining individual organizational levels
Note#532695 - PFCG: Incorrect organizational level values in derived roles
>
> Please elaborate on this one. I think we're running into an urban myth here....
>
> Organizational levels are only instruments to assist in building roles. For the final profile it does not matter whether a field is organizational or not. It will not influence the behaviour of the authority-check.
For the final profile it matters during loading of User authorization data to User Buffer. Think about the Parameter values stored for a particular user. How it behaves for all Objects containing a particular Auth. Field and providing default assignment for that user whenever he tries to perform any action where this field is required to populate.
If we delete any Object from SU24 proposal then it doesn't mean that the check will not be carried out or the Org. Field contained in that object will not be populated with it's values. I tried to make this clear to the requester.
Regards,
Dipanjan
Edited by: Dipanjan Sanpui on Jun 8, 2009 7:49 AM

Multiple logins on one computer - Different accounts, same picture...?

Greetings,
Since the iPhone 3.0 recently released push notifications, I decided to open an account for my wife that she could use on her iPhone. From what I understand, iChat now allows multiple logins on each computer.
I set everything up accordingly, noted that I am the admin on this computer, my picture pops into my ichat name. If I then enable her account on the same computer, her login also pops up next to my window. This is working according to plan.
However, if I try to change the picture on her ichat window it also changes on mine. What am I doing wrong here?
Cheers...

Hi,
iChat can not display different Buddy Pics for different Buddy Lists.
This may change with Snow Leopard.
Click the iChat Menu and use the Feedback option and post your wish there.
iChat can use one of 4 Buddy pics.
You can set a Pic in the iChat Buddy List by clicking on the current one and using the edit features.
If there is not one in the Address Book for yourself And this tends to be the one selected in System Preferences > Accounts > Your account although you can set them to be different (Three choices so far) it will default to one for the account type (A Running yellow man for AIM, A Blue Globe for @mac.com names and the Cloud for MobileMe names).
Apple have tended to suppose that if two or more people are going to be using a Mac that there are then Mac User Accounts set up on the computer and therefore there is no issue with Buddy Pics.
The iChat Buddy List is held on the AIM server (AIM names, @Mac.com [email protected] ones).
Part of the process is that the local Buddy list compares this to the Address Book and Add the Real names you have entered.
So only this name in the Address Book on that computer will show Real names if entered.
You can Export the Address Book on one computer and Import on the other to get them the same. (Or Sync via MobileMe if you have an Account)
You are getting in to the realms of your wife's Buddies being in your Address Book.
Did I mention another Mac User Account ?
10:31 PM Thursday; June 25, 2009

Significance of Account Type EXP,LEQ,INC,AST in BPC- Need some valid reason

Hi,
I have a question why we need account type in BPC. Is there really any Business significance for maintaining Account Type ?
Account type LEQ, INC it behaves differently while load data/display data as sign change happens in SAP Back end. Major issue comes when you try to create a re-concillation report using BEX tool for LEQ, INC accounts in BPC and BI cube as you need to reverse the sign in BEX side for any calculation or any data match for INC and LEQ accounts.
My implication is : Is there anything wrong if we take all accounts as EXP account type because what data comes from other source/Input schedule remain as such for all accounts. There will be no Discrepancy/confusion of sign while in reporting in BI side or BPC side. You can follow normal calculation process if you have calculated any item in the report and does not bother about the account type and behaves same as the BI cube data.
Any idea or any issue if the above implication is implemented. I need some concrete reasons for the above issue as it create a extra headache/confusion in BPC impementation project.
Thanks
Debasisha

Hi Debasish,
Lets take a simple example. Lets say you have revenue as INC, sales as EXP and Profit as INC. You enter values from input schedule as below
Acct    Type    Value entered in IS      Value in DB
Revenue   INC   400                   -400
Sales   EXP     100                  100
Lets say Profit is the parent, then the values will be
Profit   INC   -300
In the report, you will see the data as 300 (since profit is of type INC).
However, if you keep all as EXP, then
Acct    Type    Value entered in IS      Value in DB
Revenue   EXP   400                   400
Sales   EXP     100                  100
Profit    EXP                             500
The above data, as you can see, is incorrect. Now, for making it correct, you need to put a formula for Profit as Revenue - Sales. This looks easy, however, will become cumbersome with more number of members.
Hope you got the idea now.

Multiple Accounts in 7.0 using Dynamic User Forms and Account Types

Guys/Gals,
We are attempting to implement the new way of handling multiple account types in IDM 7.0 and so far are coming up unsuccessful. We have managed to customize the Dynamic Resource Forms to create standard default AD accounts, however when we attempt to create different account types of AD(i.e type ADMIN account, or TEST account) we have a no go. We've made identity rules for the types of accounts we have, and the form displays the attributes, however when we go to save, the it attemts to update the default account, and not make the new account type. Has anyone implemented these new features? Any help or suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!

Were you ever able to implement this? I was told this was the way to handle multiple accounts for a user on a resource, but so far it's not making much sense to me, nor does it seem feasible. I was wondering if you had any success with it.

Document type should always post to specific account type

Hello experts,
I have 1 question, Depeneding on the Document type definition I can post to different account types (S, K, D , M ,A). Assume I created a doc type ZA and checked all the account types then it allows me post to all the account types.
Here I want the document type ZA to validate one of the line in the document should always be type K (vendor). In short in the combinaton of account types posted to under this document type should always have one specified account type.
All contributions welcome.
Thanks,
KKR

Hi Eli,
I am not sure how to do that in this case, I have worked on validations before and I always worked with 'Constants'. If I write
If Doc type is ZA
then account type should be 'K'
But the problem is it wont allow me to post as the other line will always be different, that means a combination K and other than K.
And we are not sure how many lines going to be there in a GL document.
Do I nee to look at user exits in validations? If yes, please let me know how can I do that.
Thanks,
KKR
Edited by: KK Rao on Sep 24, 2010 11:07 AM

Posting period not open for a/c type S and G/L :400020

Hi Gurus,
While posting GR through MB1C, I am getting an error message "Period 009/2009 is Not open for Account type S and G/L:400020".
I also went to table T001B, but could not do much.
Please help.
Thanks,
Kumar

in OB52
+ Valid for all account types
your all account will be opened. otherwise check OMSY for your company code
NHID NCC Housing and Infrastru 2009 6 2009 5 2008 12
change your settings to the above till it is working
Thanks
Rajakumar.K

FI_Document Archiving - Account type life not reached (T071)

Hi,
This is related to archiving FI_Documnt. Few of the documents are not able to archive and the reason is Account type life not reached (T071). I have entered same number of retention dayes for account type and document type, that is too for all account type (*) and document type. My understanding is system first checks the header level retention i.e. document type and then moves on to check account level. If retention days are same for doc and account type, when document type retension reached why should I get mess as account type life not reached.
Could someone help me to understand what could be the reason.
Regards,
Shailesh

Hi Gurus
I'm in a project archive, I have a problem with FI_DOCUMNT, and set the days of Life Document / Account which exceeds the limit of days to archive, when I run the archive process sends me an error that life has not been reached, any ideas?
The year archiving is 2006.
Document Life 366
Life Account 366
release 4.7
Regards

CUP 5.3: unlock account type request

Hello,
Has anyone implemented request type for unlock account type without psw verification for LDAP authentication..but it still limits the user to only be able to unlock themselves, not anyone else?
I think Password self service should have included automatic unlocking of the userid as well..since most PSS requests are when the userid is locked in a system due to incorrect logons..so the unlocking request shouldn't have been separate from PSS.. It's a two step process to do currently..the user has to first do an unlock id request and then do a PSS to reset their psw.
But for those clients that are authenticating GRC system against a SAP system, there's no workaround to not require SAP id and psw ..but how can the user tell you the psw when they're locked out of that system to begin with..due to incorrect logon. SAP has no solution for it. They do need to come up with a solution for that and also automatically unlock the userid for PSS processes instead of having them go thru another request to unlock it.
Would greatly appreciate other ppl's feedback who have implemented PSS and unlock requests with LDAP authentication without psw verification.. otherwise, I would think anyone can unlock anyone without psw verification. The unlock request in order to automate the option to only unlock yourself but still be able to process requests of change or new account for others, is not available. It's either all or nothing in configuration.
Alley

Hello,
Has anyone implemented request type for unlock account type without psw verification for LDAP authentication..but it still limits the user to only be able to unlock themselves, not anyone else?
I think Password self service should have included automatic unlocking of the userid as well..since most PSS requests are when the userid is locked in a system due to incorrect logons..so the unlocking request shouldn't have been separate from PSS.. It's a two step process to do currently..the user has to first do an unlock id request and then do a PSS to reset their psw.
But for those clients that are authenticating GRC system against a SAP system, there's no workaround to not require SAP id and psw ..but how can the user tell you the psw when they're locked out of that system to begin with..due to incorrect logon. SAP has no solution for it. They do need to come up with a solution for that and also automatically unlock the userid for PSS processes instead of having them go thru another request to unlock it.
Would greatly appreciate other ppl's feedback who have implemented PSS and unlock requests with LDAP authentication without psw verification.. otherwise, I would think anyone can unlock anyone without psw verification. The unlock request in order to automate the option to only unlock yourself but still be able to process requests of change or new account for others, is not available. It's either all or nothing in configuration.
Alley

Reduced Access Based on Account Type

Hello,
I have a client who would like to allow full access to the entire team for their accounts execpt for 2 types. How can I limit the accounts to the owner/manager for the 2 types verses allowing the team to have visibility?
For instance, account types = to Platinum, Gold, Silver, Bronze are ok for the entire sales team (with the same role) to see. The account types = to Elite and Premier are only visiible to owner and manager.
Thank you in advance for your assistance,
Shawnda

Thanks for your quick reply.
Will do!
Thanks,
Shawnda

Posting to Two different GL account for one condition type

Hi All,
In MM pricing procedure we are assigning one new condition type as Management Exp Charges.
we creat two Transaction/Event key and assigned one in ActKy Colum and another in in Accural column.
Suppose we are charging 10 $ towards Management Exp.
Is there any way to Post 10$ in two different GL account.
DR.Expnses account (As per GL assigned in Actky column) 10$
Cr. Expenses Accural charges ( GL aasigned in accural Colum) 10$
Howevre as per our current setting it was Cr to Accural account but for debit transaction it was going to stock/gain account.
please help us to resolve this issue.
Thanks in advance
Regards,
Lokanath

Hi
Can u specify why the customer two interest rates for one loan type. Is the interest on loan going to change for any periodicity.
Other wise you can create two loan types with nearest understandable naming convenction and use them for your business requirement. Which ever is applicable for the employee can be selected by your customer.
Brs
Kenu

Cost Distribution in Shopping Cart for different account assignment type

Hi friends,
We are at SRM Server 5.5 at level SAPKIBKT07. Business scenario is extended classic.
User is creating a shopping cart with single line item and distributing the cost to multiple account assignments (say Cost Center and Order). Shopping cart has a valid source of supply. System creates a PO in SRM and tryu2019s to replicate the PO in ECC backend, however fails to replicate.
My understanding is that in ECC backend it is not possible to combine two different account assignments while distributing cost at item details.
Solution would be to create separate line items for different account assignments (distribute between similar account assignments).
Is my understanding right?
Thanking you in advance,
Sandeep

Sreedhar,
Thanks for your update.
I am also MM consultant, so as far as MM goes we can only maintain one account assignment type per line item. In MM we have provision of multiple account assignment but it works only for single account assignment type per line item. Which means if account assignment is "k" then we can split between multiple cost centers, but we cannot split between cost center and WBS element in one line item.
You said it is possible to split between multiple account assignments in one line item. Will it be possible for you to try at your end and let me know how PO/PR are created in backend?
Sandeep

PCUI - Different Text type for Accounts and Contact Persons

Hi All,
While configuring the Text Determination, how can we have different determination procedures for Accounts and Contacts. On the CRM back end side there is no distinction on the objtect type for account & contacts. Instead there is one for BP.
We defined a Text Det Proc for Object BUT000 (Business Partners) which gives us the same text types in both accounts and contact person screens in PCUI. But we want different text types. Can any one please advise.
Thanks in advance,
Raj K

Hello All,
Any suggestions in this matter would be greatly appreciated. Thanks,
Raj Kasa

ME27 behaving different for different accounting types?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for