ME3400E parent child policy map

I've pasted the output of the show policy-map that is applied to an interface that connected to an access layer switch - I want one customer to have 15MB and the other customers to share the remaining bandwidth of the 200MB of internet bandwidth we currently have.
Does it look like it is working? It has only been applied for an hour or 2 - I dont' understand why under the Class-map: cust1 is shows 0 packets, and under the service policy class-Map is shows 0 packets and 0 bytes, but it shows that packets are conforming under the police section . . .
ME.3400#sh policy-map int g0/11
GigabitEthernet0/11
Service-policy input: IP_Parent
    Class-map: cust1 (match-any)
      0 packets
      Match: vlan 301
      Service-policy : cust1
Class-map: class-default (match-any)
          0 packets, 0 bytes
          5 minute offered rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps
          Match: any
      police cir 15000000 bc 468750
         conform-action transmit
         exceed-action drop
      conform: 3354685 (packets) 596174238 (bytes)
      exceed: 0 (packets) 0 (bytes)
      conform: 1945694 bps, exceed: 0 bps
    Class-map: Shared_IP (match-any)
      0 packets
      Match: vlan 300
      Service-policy : Shared_IP
        Class-map: class-default (match-any)
          0 packets, 0 bytes
          5 minute offered rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps
          Match: any
      police cir 80000000 bc 1000000
         conform-action transmit
         exceed-action drop
      conform: 878911 (packets) 145461269 (bytes)
      exceed: 0 (packets) 0 (bytes)
      conform: 409508 bps, exceed: 0 bps
    Class-map: class-default (match-any)
      0 packets, 0 bytes
      5 minute offered rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps
      Match: any

Here is the output after letting it run for 6 days. Does anyone have an opinion about if it is working correctly?
I'm still confused by the places where it says 0 packets, or 0 packets, 0 bytes.
ME.3400#sh policy-map int g0/11
GigabitEthernet0/11
Service-policy input: IP_Parent
    Class-map: cust1 (match-any)
      0 packets
      Match: vlan 301
      Service-policy : cust1
        Class-map: class-default (match-any)
          0 packets, 0 bytes
          5 minute offered rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps
          Match: any
      police cir 15000000 bc 468750
         conform-action transmit
         exceed-action drop
      conform: 911003596 (packets) 153048040973 (bytes)
      exceed: 445 (packets) 439435 (bytes)
      conform: 2501473 bps, exceed: 0 bps
    Class-map: Shared_IP (match-any)
      0 packets
      Match: vlan 300
      Service-policy : Shared_IP
        Class-map: class-default (match-any)
          0 packets, 0 bytes
          5 minute offered rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps
          Match: any
      police cir 180000000 bc 1000000
         conform-action transmit
         exceed-action drop
      conform: 262737871 (packets) 42238049347 (bytes)
      exceed: 0 (packets) 0 (bytes)
      conform: 1005000 bps, exceed: 0 bps
    Class-map: class-default (match-any)
      0 packets, 0 bytes
      5 minute offered rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps
      Match: any

Similar Messages

Policy map/ class map/ service policy for IOS xr

Hi,
I need to create a policy map and class map/service policy to limit the amount of bandwidth that can be used on one interface both in and out.
I need the cap for the bandwidth to traverse this circuit to ne 10 Meg.
the IOS xr version we are using is 4.3.4
I was hoping someone could help me out by giving me a configuration example I could follow.
Thank you.

for instance like this:
policy-map police-in
class class-default
police rate 10 mpbs <optionally set burst>
policy-map shape-out-parent
class class-default
shape 10 mpbs <optional burst config>
service-policy shape-out-child
policy-map shape-out-child
class class-default
queue-limit 10 packets
int g 0/0/0/0
service-policy police-in in
service-policy shape-out-parent out
also have a look at CL 2013/2014 (orlando/sanfran) ID 2904 for more QOS details
and the support forum article of "asr9000 quality of service architecture"
xander

Class-Map and Policy-Map Configuration in CM Confusion

Hi,
I'm implementing a green field WAAS deployment for a customer. We currently have a Proof-of-Concept up and running.
I've got some questions regarding custom class-map and policy-map configuration in the CM. I'd like to nail-down the custom class-map and policy-map configuration (and understanding) in the PoC before cutting over the PoC branches to the production WAAS environment.
Assuming a typical WAAS Deployment using WCCP for off-path interception, branch to DC.
==> 61 in LAN (BRANCH ROUTER) <== 62 in WAN (WAN CLOUD) ==> 61 in WAN (DC ROUTER) <== 62 in LAN
We are using two distinct device groups, BRANCH and DATA CENTER.
If the customer has traffic that we need to classify in order to provide TFO only optimisation, should the single class-map include the traffic in both directions? Ie., (assume the SERVER is 10.1.1.1 TCP Port 443). Should the class-map be configured as:
Class-Map
Line 1: DST IP 10.1.1.1 DST Port 443
Line 2: SRC IP 10.1.1.1 SRC Port 443
Or in this case is only the DST line required? And in which Device Group should the custom policy be applied? Or should it be applied to both Device Groups? If it should be applied to both Device Groups, then would it make more sense to have the policy-map in the Branch DG configured to match the DST traffic, and on the Data Center DG have a different class-map match the SRC traffic?
My confusion is how to classify the traffic (SRC or DST or Both - Separate classes for each or different lines within the same class-map), and where to apply the appropriate policy (both Device Groups, just Branch, just DC) and why...
I tried to apply a custom policy and the impact in the PoC was that the TCP Summary report stopped reporting the individual traffic classes showed 'other traffic' only. Can anyone explain why this may have occurred?
I hope this makes sense.

for instance like this:
policy-map police-in
class class-default
police rate 10 mpbs <optionally set burst>
policy-map shape-out-parent
class class-default
shape 10 mpbs <optional burst config>
service-policy shape-out-child
policy-map shape-out-child
class class-default
queue-limit 10 packets
int g 0/0/0/0
service-policy police-in in
service-policy shape-out-parent out
also have a look at CL 2013/2014 (orlando/sanfran) ID 2904 for more QOS details
and the support forum article of "asr9000 quality of service architecture"
xander

EJB 3, OneToMany that Acts As Tree, or Parent Child relationship support?

(Sorry for the RoR reference)
I first searched the forum and found this post that came close, but not exactly what I'm needing since my table doesn't reference the PK:
http://forum.java.sun.com/thread.jspa?forumID=13&threadID=767913
I have a table called Folder that represents a folder hierarchy. It has a 'Path' field and a 'Parent' field, and of course 'ID'. Each Folder knows its parent by the 'Parent' field, which references 'Path', not* 'ID'. Both are Strings.
To find all the children of a Folder, the sql for a PreparedStatment might look something like this (shared for clarity of the situation):
SELECT * FROM Folder
WHERE Parent = ?Question:
What are the proper annotations in EJB 3 / JPA to allow this kind non-primary key parent/child relationship mapping?
Can I specify a named query that handles the logic and then reference it in the OneToMany annotation? Other cool tricks?
Here is what I am trying (no runtime errors, but no results either). (Example simplified)
@Entity
@Table(name = "Folder")
@NamedQueries(value = {@NamedQuery(.......)})
public class Folder implements Serializable {
    @Id
    @Column(name = "ID", nullable = false, updatable = false)
    private Integer folderID;
    @Column(name = "Path", nullable = false)
    private String path;
    @Column(name = "Parent")
    private String parent;
    // v Here's the kicker v
    @OneToMany(cascade={CascadeType.ALL}, fetch=FetchType.EAGER)
    @JoinTable(name="Folder",
        joinColumns={@JoinColumn(name="Parent")},
        inverseJoinColumns={@JoinColumn(name="Path")})
    private List<Folder> children;
    // getters and setters ....
}Thanks!

It looks like the relationship is bi-directional.
Will this work...
// Parent.java
@Entity
public class Parent implements java.io.Serializable {
@Id
public Long parentId;
@OneToMany(cascade=CascadeType.PERSIST,mappedBy="parent")
public Collection<Child> children;
// Child.java
@Entity
public class Child implements java.io.Serializable {
@Id
public Long childId;
@ManyToOne
public Parent parent; // target of mappedBy
}Then, in your code (a session facade?), you'll create the parent first, create the children, then add the children to the parent. Your code is also responsible for maintaining the reference back to the parent.
Parent p = new Parent();
for(int i=0; i<10; i++) {
Child c = new Child();
p.children.add(c);
c.parent = p;
em.persist(p);

Parent - Child mapping - ODI

Hi experts,
I have source as a below format, in .xls, this is parent- child relationship..
Gen1     Gen2     Gen3     Gen4
9000000009 blank     blank     blank
blank     910000000 blank     blank
blank     blank     9110000000     blank
blank     blank     9120000009     blank
blank     blank     blank     9121100009
And trying the data into Oracle table with the below format.
Gen1     Gen2     Gen3     Gen4
9000000009
9000000009     9100000009
9000000009     9100000009     9110000000
9000000009     9100000009     9120000009
9000000009     9100000009     9120000009     9121100009
Please help me what is the workaround I can follow to achieve using ODI.
regards,
Preet
Edited by: 914626 on Mar 4, 2012 10:13 PM
Edited by: 914626 on Mar 4, 2012 10:14 PM
Edited by: 914626 on Mar 4, 2012 10:15 PM
Edited by: 914626 on Mar 4, 2012 10:15 PM
Edited by: 914626 on Mar 4, 2012 10:17 PM

Thanks for the thoroughness. There was a mistake in moving the code over for the forum. The field names are correct throughout the original source code.
BASE_OBJECT_ID is used throughout.
I suspect the problem lies in the one-to-many sampleItem(s) relationship that is based upon the subclassed item class. (The relationship is actually "sampleItems" in the real code and somehow got changed in the move over.)
The problem may lie in the mapping of the attribute override in the child class to the referencing of the item class from the parent side of the relationship in the Sample class.
I further suspect this may be specific to Eclipselink based upon other postings I've seen on the web that have similar problems...
Any thoughts?
Edited by: Chris-R on Mar 3, 2010 9:56 AM

Informatica parent child mapping

  down votefavorite I have a scenario where suppose saycountry      province      city      zip
ind           ts           hyd       xyz
ind          maha          mum       abc
Desired output:id   name         parent-id
1    india         1
2    telengana     1
3    hyderabad     2
4    xyz           3
5    mumbai        1
6    abc           5
I have to do it with informatica mapping any ideas how do I show this parent child relationship. I am not able to get the logic for thisThanksKumar

Thanks for the thoroughness. There was a mistake in moving the code over for the forum. The field names are correct throughout the original source code.
BASE_OBJECT_ID is used throughout.
I suspect the problem lies in the one-to-many sampleItem(s) relationship that is based upon the subclassed item class. (The relationship is actually "sampleItems" in the real code and somehow got changed in the move over.)
The problem may lie in the mapping of the attribute override in the child class to the referencing of the item class from the parent side of the relationship in the Sample class.
I further suspect this may be specific to Eclipselink based upon other postings I've seen on the web that have similar problems...
Any thoughts?
Edited by: Chris-R on Mar 3, 2010 9:56 AM

JPA One-To-Many Parent-Child Mapping Problem

I am trying to map an existing legacy Oracle schema that involves a base class table and two subclass tables that are related by a one-to-many relationship which is of a parent-child nature.
The following exception is generated. Can anybody provide a suggestion to fix the problem?
Exception [EclipseLink-45] (Eclipse Persistence Services - 2.0.0.v20091127-r5931): org.eclipse.persistence.exceptions.DescriptorException
Exception Description: Missing mapping for field [BASE_OBJECT.SAMPLE_ID].
Descriptor: RelationalDescriptor(domain.example.entity.Sample --> [DatabaseTable(BASE_OBJECT), DatabaseTable(SAMPLE)])
The schema is as follows:
CREATE TABLE BASE_OBJECT(
"BASE_OBJECT_ID" INTEGER PRIMARY KEY NOT NULL,
"NAME" VARCHAR2(128) NOT NULL,
"DESCRIPTION" CLOB NOT NULL,
"BASE_OBJECT_KIND" NUMBER(5,0) NOT NULL );
CREATE TABLE SAMPLE(
"SAMPLE_ID" INTEGER PRIMARY KEY NOT NULL,
"SAMPLE_TEXT" VARCHAR2(128) NOT NULL )
CREATE TABLE SAMPLE_ITEM(
"SAMPLE_ITEM_ID" INTEGER PRIMARY KEY NOT NULL,
"SAMPLE_ID" INTEGER NOT NULL,
"QUANTITY" INTEGER NOT NULL )
The entities are related as follows:
SAMPLE.SAMPLE_ID -> BASE_OBJECT.BASE_OBJECT_ID - The PKs that are used to join the sample to the base class
SAMPLE_ITEM.SAMPLE_ITEM_ID -> BASE_OBJECT.BASE_OBJECT_ID - The PKs that are used to join the sample item to the base class
SAMPLE_ITEM.SAMPLE_ID -> SAMPLE.SAMPLE_ID - The FK that is used to join the sample item to the sample class as a child of the parent.
SAMPLE is one to many SAMPLE_ITEM
The entity classes are as follows:
@Entity
@Table( name = "BASE_OBJECT" )
@Inheritance( strategy = InheritanceType.JOINED )
@DiscriminatorColumn( name = "BASE_KIND", discriminatorType = DiscriminatorType.INTEGER )
@DiscriminatorValue( "1" )
public class BaseObject
extends SoaEntity
@Id
@GeneratedValue( strategy = GenerationType.SEQUENCE, generator = "BaseObjectIdSeqGen" )
@SequenceGenerator( name = "BaseObjectIdSeqGen", sequenceName = "BASE_OBJECT_PK_SEQ", allocationSize = 1 )
@Column( name = "BASE_ID" )
private long baseObjectId = 0;
@Entity
@Table( name = "SAMPLE" )
@PrimaryKeyJoinColumn( name = "SAMPLE_ID" )
@AttributeOverride(name="baseObjectId", column=@Column(name="SAMPLE_ID"))
@DiscriminatorValue( "2" )
public class Sample
extends BaseObject
@OneToMany( cascade = CascadeType.ALL )
@JoinColumn(name="SAMPLE_ID",referencedColumnName="SAMPLE_ID")
private List<SampleItem> sampleItem = new LinkedList<SampleItem>();
@Entity
@Table( name = "SAMPLE_ITEM" )
@PrimaryKeyJoinColumn( name = "SAMPLE_ITEM_ID" )
@AttributeOverride(name="baseObjectId", column=@Column(name="SAMPLE_ITEM_ID"))
@DiscriminatorValue( "3" )
public class SampleItem
extends BaseObject
@Basic( optional = false )
@Column( name = "SAMPLE_ID" )
private long sampleId = 0;
Edited by: Chris-R on Mar 2, 2010 4:45 PM

Thanks for the thoroughness. There was a mistake in moving the code over for the forum. The field names are correct throughout the original source code.
BASE_OBJECT_ID is used throughout.
I suspect the problem lies in the one-to-many sampleItem(s) relationship that is based upon the subclassed item class. (The relationship is actually "sampleItems" in the real code and somehow got changed in the move over.)
The problem may lie in the mapping of the attribute override in the child class to the referencing of the item class from the parent side of the relationship in the Sample class.
I further suspect this may be specific to Eclipselink based upon other postings I've seen on the web that have similar problems...
Any thoughts?
Edited by: Chris-R on Mar 3, 2010 9:56 AM

Policy-map based rate-limiting per vlan

Hi
I was thinking if someone could help me to come up with solution to a problem. Scenario as follow:
I have a trunk interface with multiple vlans on:
interface GigabitEthernet2/0/3
description TRUNK-to-*********
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport trunk allowed vlan 415,416,610,1191-1193,1195
switchport mode trunk
duplex full
storm-control broadcast level pps 1k
storm-control multicast level pps 3k
storm-control unicast level pps 250k
storm-control action trap
spanning-tree portfast trunk
spanning-tree bpdufilter enable
I'm trying to rate limit two of the vlans that are present on this trunk interface - vlan 415 and vlan 1192.
So I'm putting the class-map (to be later applied under the policy-map which is not significant here):
(config)#class-map match-any 120-mbps-class
(config-cmap)#match input-interface vlan 415
(config-cmap)#match input-interface vlan 1192
Now, when you show the class-map I created, I can see this:
sh class-map 120-mbps-class
Class Map match-any 120-mbps-class (id 1)
   Match input-interface Vlan415
   Match input-interface FastEthernet0
For some bizzare reason class-map is matching the Fa0. I have researched this, and this is most probably because you can only match 1 vlan instance under the class-map.
And here's my problem - I can't police whole interface as the other vlans should not be policed - how can I police those two vlans ?
Any thoughts ? All help appreciated as always.
Rob.

Hi Daniel,
I have labed it and unfortuantely it does not work as expected. I have put 1x 3750 and 1x 2960 trunk between them, each box had an access port for laptop to create some traffic across. All vlan-based qos has been applied on 3750G.
3750G config
Interface g1/0/20
descriprion trunk
swicthport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport mode trunk
switchport trunk allowed vlan 100,120
Interface g1/0/1
description access
switchport mode access
switchport access vlan 100
Interface vlan 100
ip address 192.168.100.254
service-policy input PARENT-POLICER
Interface vlan 120
ip address 10.10.10.1
Policy-map PARENT-POLICER
class PERMIT-ANY-CLASS
trust COS
service-policy CHILD-POLICER
class-map match-any PERMIT-ANY-CLASS
match access-group name POLICY-LIST
Extended IP access list POLICY-LIST
    10 permit ip any any
Policy-map CHILD-POLICER
class INTERFACE-POLICE-CLASS
police 100000 8000 exceed-action drop
Class Map match-any INTERFACE-POLICE-CLASS
Match input-interface GigabitEthernet1/0/20
2960 config:
interface g0/20
switchport mode trunk
switchport trunk allowed vlan 100,120
interface g0/1
switchport mode access
switchport access vlan 100
interface vlan 100
ip address 192.168.100.253
interface vlan 120
ip address 10.10.10.2
So as you can see vlan 100 is the one it need to be rate limited (I have only rate limited to 100kbps just to see if it's working) and vlan 120 is only on the trunk ports to confirm if the traffic for this one is not affected.
Unfortunately when the policing is applied on 3750 vlan 100 (and policing is working fine) then I can see the packet loss while pinging between switches on vlan 120 suggesting that the policy is affecting the other vlan as well. When I take the policy out of the vlan 100 I cannot observe the packet loss on vlan 120 meaning is no longer affected.
Not sure if I have explained this clear enough so far, if not let me know.
Do you have any suggestions ?
Thanks!

Regarding policy map

HI Team,
If we use the folowing comands for QOS, what is the effect of
   service-policy NIC-QOS-OUT, as i have studied service policy will be applied under physical interfaces. Here policy map has been defined and again it is referred under Parent-QoS-2.5GIG policy map. So please clarify
policy-map NIC-QoS-OUT
description #### Common Child Policy ####
class VIDEO&VOICE-OUT
   police cir percent 20
    priority
class NICNET-OUT
    bandwidth percent 20
    random-detect dscp-based
class CONTROL-OUT
    bandwidth percent 10
    random-detect dscp-based
class INTERNET-SURF-OUT
    bandwidth percent 10
    random-detect dscp-based
class class-default
    random-detect
policy-map Parent-QoS-2.5GIG
description #### Parent QoS Policy for 2.5 GIG Link ####
class class-default
    shape average 2300000000
   service-policy NIC-QoS-OUT
policy-map NIC-QOS-OUT
Thanks in advance,
Naveen

The two ASA syslogs you posted were both from an internal host to port 80 on an external host. This would indicate that a sucessful DNS resolution has occured in these two instances.
If the cause of your problem is bad DNS lookups, you should see evidence in your AIP-SSM event log of the packets being dropped.
- Bob

Parent-child relation between Activities

Hello,
Is it possible to give parent child relationship between Activities within single Project? The requirement is, parent Activity to take part in overall scheduling whereas the Dates for parent Activity are determined by the child Activities attached to it.
Thank you,
Hemant

Hi,
In PS we can map through the network activity and activity elemnents. For scheduling the projects the start date and end date of all the activity elements are included in the respective network activity. for better understanding refer the following link.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/a9/8a853488601e33e10000009b38f83b/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/a9/8a853488601e33e10000009b38f83b/frameset.htm
Regards,
Nag.

Parent Child relation in one transaction throws error... (

In nutshell, I have a parent->child relation ship in DB and due to the UI requirement, I created view link as Child->parent, it is giving a hack a lot of problems.... (it sounds silly but looks like I am loosing my mind over this)
Let me explain my situation,
- I have a table A with col-a and col-b. I have another table B with col-a (primary key) and col-c. (This way table A is a parent table)
- ON UI side i created relationship like table B is parent and Table A is child using col-a
- I need to create parent-child (one record for each) record programatically.........
I tried following thing:
- from backing bean, as soon as i create Table-B row first, i get error saying too many objects with same key (which is understandable because of table design..... and associaion must be throwing that error)
- from EOImpl file, it doesn't even find the child record being created... so during commit I can't send the foreign key value from Table-a to Table-b
Any suggestion is greatly appreciated?
Thank you,
-Raj

that depends on how you implement the multiple selection of orders.. you have to pass the selectedValues to the backend or store the values in a map or list and pass it..

Parent-Child relation total

i have 2 tables;
Table 1
Parent ID
Parent Name
Amount
table 2
DPND_CODE
DPND_NAME
DPND_RELAT_CODE
DPND_DOB
DPND_YN
DPND_SHARE_AMOUNT
DPND_BANK_CODE
DPND_BANK_AC_NO
DPND_AGENT_CODE
the query should check for the WHERE condition that dpnd_yn "Y"
Parent ID       Parent Name        Amount
001                emp1                   200.000
    001_01       emp1_chld1     50.000
    001_02       emp1_chld2     50.000
    001_03       emp1_chld3     50.000
    001_04       emp1_chld4     50.000
.

i was totally confused n hasty..Sorry to post with so incomplete info.
actually i have a table that stores the total amount paid to an employee.
for that my Table1 above serves the purpose.
Table 1
Parent ID
Parent Name
Amount
the IInd table stores the distribution of the above (TABLE 1) total amount,
to his family in case he has died. so the correct child table 2 struc is;
table 2
DPND_CODE
DPND_NAME
DPND_RELAT_CODE
DPND_DOB
DPND_YN
DPND_SHARE_AMOUNT
DPND_BANK_CODE
DPND_BANK_AC_NO
DPND_AGENT_CODE
dpnd_PARENT_id (Foreign key)
and therefore the result that m looking for is;
PARENT ID      PARENT NAME      AMOUNT
001                emp1                   200.000 <------FROM TABLE 1
    dpnd_code dpnd_name     dpnd_share_amount
    001_01       emp1_chld1     50.000 |
    001_02       emp1_chld2     50.000 |__FROM TABLE 2
    001_03       emp1_chld3     50.000 |
    001_04       emp1_chld4     50.000 |
a condition should check whether dpnd_YN field = "Y",
as all the next-of-kin members details of the deceased family is entered in the system at the time of his death.
where as per rule only few qualify to get the share from the deceased pension as per policy.
therefore the query should pick up only child records whom dpnd_YN IS MARKED As 'Y'.
You've provided (3), but I don't know if that's really a good illustration of your problem.
Do you have just one root (001), or can you have multiple roots (001, 002, 003, etc.)?
Does the parent-child relationship go beyond two levels? (Thta is, can you have 001_01_01 or 001_01_02_03?)
Yes the ROOT is always one, it will never go beyond two levels. (Just 001_01, 001_02...002_01, 002_02...003_01, 003_02..)
Hope i am much better than before.
ty
Edited by: user613563 on Oct 27, 2008 3:01 PM
Edited by: user613563 on Oct 27, 2008 3:05 PM

Parent child deletion in ODI

Hi ,
I am using ODI for data migration.
I have created interface for that . i have done error handling . now i need to implement parent child deletion. that is i need to delete parent record if the child record is no there for a particular Policy. can any one help me in implementing this in ODI.

Can you please provide me the steps/document for exception handling in ODI interfaces.. I am creating interfaces to load flat files into custom tables and I need to provide exception handling in each interface. I would appreciate.
Thanks
Ram

Cascading parent/child inserts while avoiding uniqueness constraints

Assume that I have two classes that I'd like to persist: MyObject and
InternalObject. MyObject has an InternalObject field. That is, MyObject is
the parent, InternalObject is the child in this one-to-one relationship.
Steps involved:
1) Enable ForeignKeyConstraints property in kodo.properties. That is add
the line,
kodo.jdbc.ForeignKeyConstraints=true
2) In package.jdo, add the following kodo extensions for MyObject's
InternalObject field mapping, i.e., io in my case.
<field name="io" default-fetch-group="false">
<extension vendor-name="kodo" key="jdbc-delete-action"
value="cascade"/>
<extension vendor-name="kodo" key="dependent" value="true"/>
</field>
The reasons that we have done these steps: we'd like kodo to properly
re-order the sql statements if necessary in order not to violate
parent/child dependencies during insertion, and also force cascading
deletes in case we delete the parent object.
Now comes the bulk of the algorithm.
String sKey // key of the object to insert
String sValue //value of the object to insert
MyObject o = new MyObject(sKey, sValue);
InternalObject io = new InternalObject(sKey,sValue); //using same values :)
o.setInternalObject(io); //parent-child relation
Object id = ((PersistenceCapable) o).jdoNewObjectIdInstance();
((PersistenceCapable)o).jdoCopyKeyFieldsToObjectId(id);
kpm.currentTransaction().begin();
try {
Object trio = kpm.getObjectById(id, true);
kpm.deletePersistent(trio);
kpm.flush(); //apply deletes on the datastore
} catch (ObjectNotFoundException oe) {
System.out.println("First time!");
kpm.makePersistent(o);
kpm.currentTransaction().commit();

If this is a question, the extension you have is only a directive to
mappingtool to create cascade foreign keys. However, at runtime Kodo
will rely upon the foreign key definitions in the schema. You should
verify that the foreign key exists as you like in the schema. If you
want to have child relationships to be deleted, you should use the
dependent and element-dependent extensions.
Ahmet Bulut wrote:
Assume that I have two classes that I'd like to persist: MyObject and
InternalObject. MyObject has an InternalObject field. That is, MyObject is
the parent, InternalObject is the child in this one-to-one relationship.
Steps involved:
1) Enable ForeignKeyConstraints property in kodo.properties. That is add
the line,
kodo.jdbc.ForeignKeyConstraints=true
2) In package.jdo, add the following kodo extensions for MyObject's
InternalObject field mapping, i.e., io in my case.
<field name="io" default-fetch-group="false">
<extension vendor-name="kodo" key="jdbc-delete-action"
value="cascade"/>
<extension vendor-name="kodo" key="dependent" value="true"/>
</field>
The reasons that we have done these steps: we'd like kodo to properly
re-order the sql statements if necessary in order not to violate
parent/child dependencies during insertion, and also force cascading
deletes in case we delete the parent object.
Now comes the bulk of the algorithm.
String sKey // key of the object to insert
String sValue //value of the object to insert
MyObject o = new MyObject(sKey, sValue);
InternalObject io = new InternalObject(sKey,sValue); //using same values :)
o.setInternalObject(io); //parent-child relation
Object id = ((PersistenceCapable) o).jdoNewObjectIdInstance();
((PersistenceCapable)o).jdoCopyKeyFieldsToObjectId(id);
kpm.currentTransaction().begin();
try {
Object trio = kpm.getObjectById(id, true);
kpm.deletePersistent(trio);
kpm.flush(); //apply deletes on the datastore
} catch (ObjectNotFoundException oe) {
System.out.println("First time!");
kpm.makePersistent(o);
kpm.currentTransaction().commit();
Steve Kim
[email protected]
SolarMetric Inc.
http://www.solarmetric.com

How to handle parent-child dimension in OWB?????

i have a dimension have many levels,and the amount of levels is varing,so i cannot use the wizard to define my dimension ,seems with OWB i can only define dimension with certain amount of levels.......
my dimension data is stored with this format:
child parent
Los Angles US
US WORLD
it is called a parent-child relation ,how can i define dimension with parent-child relation witn OWB...
Can OWB do it ?????

i have a dimension have many levels,and the amount of levels is varing,so i cannot use the wizard to define my dimension ,seems with OWB i can only define dimension with certain amount of levels.......
my dimension data is stored with this format:
child parent
Los Angles US
US WORLD
it is called a parent-child relation ,how can i define dimension with parent-child relation witn OWB...
Can OWB do it ????? You must define a dimension, define the dimension levels and the hierarchy inside the dimension (a hierarchy can have as many levels as you want, parent-child relationship is a normal hierarchy concept - no rocket science here). Then you have to map the data source for the dimension levels appropriately. Please refer to the user manual, chapter 4 ("Defining dimensianal targets") for details.
Regards:
Igor

ME3400E parent child policy map

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for