Message Delivery to JMS

Hi,
I'm trying to transfer the message from one trading partner to another. Its getting delivered successfully.
I can only check the status on the Reports tab. But i'm not getting where it actually deliveres the payload. Is it delivering the messagea to a physical location?
Is it possible to deliver the message into JMS? If so,can someone help me how can i acheive that?
Thanks
Sheikh

Hello,
The destination depends on the Delivery channel configuration. Please take a look at the DC which is part of the Agreement. Please send a test mail to [email protected] , we will provide a sample on JMS.
Rgds,Ramesh

Similar Messages

JMS Provider Responsibilities For Concurrent Message Delivery

Hi,
(This question pertains to the JMS api, outside a j2ee container)
Is it JMS-provider dependent on how concurrent message delivery is implemented? In other words, the code below sets up multiple consumers (on a topic), each with their own unique session and MessageListener and then a separate producer (with its own session) sends a message to the topic and I observer that only (4) onMessage() calls can execute concurrently. When one onMessage() method exits, that same thread gets assigned to execute another onMessage().
The only thing I could find on the matter in the spec was section in 4.4.15 Concurrent Message Delivery and it's pretty vague.
It's really important because of the acknowledgment mode. If it turns out that I need to delegate the real work that would be done in the onMessage() to another thread that I must manage (create, pool, etc), then once the onMessage() method completes (i.e., after it does the delegation to another thread), the message is deemed successfully consumed and will not be re-delivered again (and that's a problem if the custom thread fails for any reason). Of course, this assumes I'm using AUTO_ACKNOWLEDGE as the acknowledgment mode (which seems to make sense since using CLIENT_ACKNOWLEDGE mode will automatically acknowledge the receipt of all messages that have been consumed by the corresponding session and that's not good).
My JMS Provider is WL 9.1 and the trival sample code I'm using as my test follows below. I also show the ouput from running the example.
thanks for any help or suggestions,
mike
--- begin TopicExample.java ---
import java.io.*;
import java.util.*;
import javax.naming.*;
import javax.jms.*;
import javax.rmi.PortableRemoteObject;
class TopicExample {
public final static String JMS_PROVIDER_URL = "t3://localhost:8001";
public final static String JNDI_FACTORY="weblogic.jndi.WLInitialContextFactory";
public final static String JMS_FACTORY="CConFac";
public final static String TOPIC="CTopic";
public final static int NUM_CONSUMERS = 10;
public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
InitialContext ctx = getInitialContext(JMS_PROVIDER_URL);
ConnectionFactory jmsFactory;
Connection jmsConnection;
Session jmsReaderSession[] = new Session[10];
Session jmsWriterSession;
TextMessage jmsMessage;
Destination jmsDestination;
MessageProducer jmsProducer;
MessageConsumer jmsConsumer[] = new MessageConsumer[10];
MessageListener ml;
try
// Create connection
jmsFactory = (ConnectionFactory)
PortableRemoteObject.narrow(ctx.lookup(JMS_FACTORY), ConnectionFactory.class);
jmsConnection = jmsFactory.createConnection();
// Obtain topic
jmsDestination = (Destination) PortableRemoteObject.narrow(ctx.lookup(TOPIC), Destination.class);
// Reader session and consumer
for (int i=0; i<NUM_CONSUMERS; i++)
jmsReaderSession[i] = jmsConnection.createSession(false, Session.AUTO_ACKNOWLEDGE);
jmsConsumer[i] = jmsReaderSession.createConsumer(jmsDestination);
jmsConsumer[i].setMessageListener(
new MessageListener()
public void onMessage(Message msg) {
try {
String msgText;
if (msg instanceof TextMessage) {
msgText = ((TextMessage)msg).getText();
} else {
msgText = msg.toString();
System.out.println("JMS Message Received: "+ msgText );
System.out.println("press <return> to exit onMessage");
char c = getChar();
System.out.println("Exiting onMessage");
} catch (JMSException jmse) {
System.err.println("An exception occurred: "+jmse.getMessage());
// Writer session and producer
jmsWriterSession = jmsConnection.createSession(false, Session.AUTO_ACKNOWLEDGE);
jmsProducer = jmsWriterSession.createProducer(jmsDestination);
jmsMessage = jmsWriterSession.createTextMessage();
jmsMessage.setText("Hello World from Java!");
jmsConnection.start();
jmsProducer.send(jmsMessage);
char c = '\u0000';
while (!((c == 'q') || (c == 'Q'))) {
System.out.println("type q then <return> to exit main");
c = getChar();
for (int i=0; i<NUM_CONSUMERS; i++)
jmsReaderSession[i].close();
jmsWriterSession.close();
jmsConnection.close();
System.out.println("INFO: Completed normally");
} finally {
protected static InitialContext getInitialContext(String url)
throws NamingException
Hashtable<String,String> env = new Hashtable<String,String>();
env.put(Context.INITIAL_CONTEXT_FACTORY, JNDI_FACTORY);
env.put(Context.PROVIDER_URL, url);
return new InitialContext(env);
static public char getChar()
char ch = '\u0000';
try {
ch = (char) System.in.read();
System.out.flush();
} catch (IOException i) {
return ch;
--- end code --
Running the example:
prompt>java TopicExample
JMS Message Received: Hello World from Java!
JMS Message Received: Hello World from Java!
press <return> to exit onMessage
press <return> to exit onMessage
JMS Message Received: Hello World from Java!
press <return> to exit onMessage
JMS Message Received: Hello World from Java!
press <return> to exit onMessage
type q then <return> to exit main
[you see, only 4 onMessage() calls execute concurrently. Now I press <return>]
Exiting onMessage
JMS Message Received: Hello World from Java!
press <return> to exit onMessage
[now once the thread executing the onMessage() completes, the JMS providor assigns it to execute another onMessage() until all 10 onMessage() exections complete).

I am too facing the same issue. but in my case I start getting this problem when the message size is about 1 MB itself.
Any help is appraciated.
Regards,
ved

Specifying message delivery time for a JMS queue

          Guys,
          Can anyone tell me as to if it possible to specify message delivery from a JMS
          queue to a listening MDB at a specified interval in weblogic . I mean I need
          to post messages to the JMS queue but I need the messages to be delivered to the
          MDB's after lets say 30 seconds .
          How can I do it using the weblogic console ?? Which property do i need to change
          Please advise.
          Thanks
          Kar


Hi,
          Message delivery time can be set programmatically,
          or through a console override. In your case, set it via
          the console with the value "30000".
          This feature has been available since 6.1, and is a
          JMS extension.
          Here is the link to the 8.1 documentation:
          http://edocs.bea.com/wls/docs81/jms/implement.html#1235262
          And for a full list of WL JMS features, see here:
          http://edocs.bea.com/wls/docs81/jms/intro.html#jms_features
          Tom
          kar piyush wrote:
          > Guys,
          >
          > Can anyone tell me as to if it possible to specify message delivery from a JMS
          > queue to a listening MDB at a specified interval in weblogic . I mean I need
          > to post messages to the JMS queue but I need the messages to be delivered to the
          > MDB's after lets say 30 seconds .
          >
          > How can I do it using the weblogic console ?? Which property do i need to change
          > ?
          >
          > Please advise.
          >
          > Thanks
          >
          > Kar
          >
          >

Guarranteed Message Delivery with OSB 11g

Hi,
I'm currently working on a scenario with OSB that requires me to set up guaranteed message delivery. The business scenario is that on one end I have a flat file polling service and I have to transform this data into XML and store it to DB. Concisely, this is the scenario: Flat File -> Proxy -> Business -> JMS Queue -> Proxy -> Business -> DB. The entire process works fine till the time I turn the DB off. In that case, I get a load of erro in the log, and the message in the Queue sits there indefinitely, Even after the DB has been restarted. The only way the message gets stored into DB is by performing a complete server restart, which, needless to say is not acceptable. Stopping and starting the proxy and business services do not work, either.
I'm using an XA data source for the DB connection pool and the default XA Connection Factory for OSB JMS transport. After delivery failure the message sits in the queue with "receiving transaction" state string. On inspection of the server logs I found that WebLogic can't connect with the datasource even when the database is completely restarted. It requires a server restart for the connection pool to work properly again.
Could anybody please provide some insight as to what I'm doing wrong?

Jms:///CF/QName works when we OSB clusterOSB JMS transport is implemented as Weblogic MDB's under the hood. From weblogic 9x onwards , mdbs bind to co-hosted destinations by default.
So if you have a distributed destination and mdb's are deployed to the same cluster ( happens when jms proxy service is deployed to the cluster) , then it is guaranteed behaviour that the mdb on ms1 binds to dd member on ms1 and mdb on ms2 binds to dd member on ms2. So you will end up seeing 16 consumers ( by default, if you have not configured any work manager to restrict concurrent threads) on each of the dd member.
we have both BPEL and OSB cluster so when BPEL posting a message how to avoid the racing condition in OSB . as both will look for same QUEUE..Make sure the connection factory used by bpel has load balancing turned on and server affinity turned off. This will ensure a pretty load balanced distribution of the messages to the dd members in the cluster which will be then processed by the proxy service hosted on the same managed server instance.

How to read the messages in the JMS Queue using JMX

Hi,
          I want to read messages in the JMS queue using JMX. I was able to read using QueueBrowser but want to modify priority of the messages using JMX.
          I tried to use JMSDestinationRuntimeMBean but it does not allow us to read messages unless we pass the message Id. Is there any way that I can get all the messages in the queue.
          I am using Weblogic 8.1 SP4
          Can someone please help me in this regard.
          Thanks,
          Kiran.
          Edited by KGudipati at 10/22/2007 1:22 AM

Hi,
As far as i know, JMS Object Messages is not supported by XI JMS adapter.
you need to have the JMS provider to transform the message to bytes messages.
(Refer to SAP note 856346)

How to hanlde breaked large messages in sender JMS adapter

Hi,
I have been asked like 'how can we handle breaked large messages in sender JMS adapter?'and lets say I am getting some messages as it is and some are breaked into small segements for the mesaages that are large....
do we need to use module,if so is there any standard module that we can use to hanlde this type of scenarios?
thank you in advance.
babu

http://biemond.blogspot.com/2009/10/jms-request-reply-interaction-pattern.html
if you check the blog of edwin, see his comments at the bottom
there he gives a suggestion how to add the selector properties to filter on
and this one is maybe helpfull
http://blogs.oracle.com/adapters/2010/05/configuring_request-reply_in_jmsadapter.html

Queue up messages in a JMS queue during DB outages.

I am currently using a MessageDriven EJB that pops messages of a JMS queue and
then grabs a connection from a weblogic dbpool and process it. However if the
database is down, the EJB still pops off messages and then throws exceptions when
trying to get the connection from the pool and the exception is logged and the
message lost.
How can i architect the application so that when the db is down the messages are
queued up in the JMS queue, so that when the DB comes back online they can be
processed.?

The $ is not a valid character for an element NAME per W3C standards. In short you can only use letters, numbers and the underscore ( _ )..
You need to correct this message / data and reprocess the message.
Setup an Error Queue so these messages get thrown some where that will not cause issues in your system. Then use error handling in something like AIA to report back to your support staff that a bad message was encountered, needs to be fixed and reprocessed.
You will see that if you do a google search for how to escape a dollar sign in xpath, there are no good results....
Hope that helps!
-Luke

Restrict message volume through JMS adapter (not individual message size)

Hi, does anyone know of a way to restrict the flow of messages through a JMS adapter? For example, If I wanted to only allow up to 1000 messages to be sent in an hour to a particular system. The rest should just be queued in the Adapter Engine until the next hour begins in order to smooth out the load on the recieving system.
I know this is poor design but there is a system that is getting overwhelmed and cannot be easily changed right away. I'd like a way to control this from the middleware using standard PI (no ccBPM).
Any ideas?
Thanks in advance,
Aaron

Stefan, thank you for the idea, that is a good one.
I'm going to assume there is nothing specific we can do in the SAP JMS adapter to control the flow, and look to a solution in the queueing software like you suggested or the 3rd party application.
-Aaron

How to set message id for JMS

Hi All,
I set up the JMS connection with JBoss, and send the message asynchrously to JBoss successfully.
But right now, Jboss need to use the incoming message ID as correlation ID in Jboss.
How could i set the message id from payload (not PI message ID, not PI Conversation ID) for JMS receiver adapter?
thanks a lot
already check the following links:
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/5059f110-0d01-0010-7c8b-fdc983be70c0
Re: jms message id in jms sender channel
JMS Correlation ID
XI JMS mq series correlation id
cannot find any about set JMS Message ID from payload
Edited by: Lawrence on Dec 24, 2009 2:21 PM

Hi Lawrence,
I am not sure how jboss will store message,But i had done similar requirement but my system is MQ,Standard JMS adapter not supports to chnage the value or set mesage id in MQ,we can change the PI Message ID Value but not JBOSS/MQ Message ID.
Writng module is the one option.
Regards,
Raj

How to pick(or consume) messages from Woblogic JMS Queue only when DB is UP

Hi,
I have a requirement to pick(or consume) messages from Woblogic JMS Queue only when DB is UP.
When DB is down, messages should remain in queue. When DB is up, messaged should be picked on scheduler basis.
We are using SOA suite 11g(BPEL or mediator,JMS Adapter).
What is the best way to achive it in SOA 11g.
I tried, but when I setup a Consumer, there is no control over there. Messages are picked automatically.
Please advise.
Thanks
Ram

something wrong with the design.
why dont you set the retry options in the fault policies?
So if the external DB is down you could reprocess them after specified interval or make it go to human retry queue.
Then you could use SOA api to retry all of them.
--Prasanna

Garbage added to log while sending message to Weblogic JMS topic

Hi All,
Was able to sucessfully send messages to Weblogic JMS topic and also able recieve them.
But while sending the messages to topic loy of debug statements are printed to the standard output
This is seen only in production and not in developement, and expecting it due config issue...
Any ideas on this is greatly appriciatied.
Thanks in advance !
Cheers,
Ambha

Thanks for the replies,
The problem is certainly not with logger settings...
The statements which are getting printed are SSL debugging
The following settings are used by the application which sends messages to the topic :
Dssl.debug=true
Dweblogic.StdoutDebugEnabled=true
These settings are same in Dev, UAT, and Production. But why the debug statements are seen only
in UAT and Production I am not sure...
*<Some TIME IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <......>*
*<Some TIME IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <......>*
*<Some TIME IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <......>*
*<Some TIME IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <......>*
*<Some TIME IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <......>*
*<Some TIME IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <......>*
*<Some TIME IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <......>*
any Ideas... ?
Thanks
Ambha

Message Delivery Restrictions failed in Exchange 2010

Hi everyone
For a customer, I wanted to restrict the use of a distribution group so that only a few selected people can send to the list. When I tried adding these users under Mail Flow Settings -> Message Delivery Restrictions, it gave me the following error:
Microsoft Exchange Error
The following error(s) occurred while saving changes:
Set-DistributionGroup
Failed
Error:
Couldn't find object "<domain>/Users/Administrator". Please make sure that it was spelled correctly or specify a different object. Reason: The recipient <domain>/Users/Administrator isn't the expected type.
OK
I know of the problem when a user is disabled, but never have seen this one before. The administrator account is active and in use (I logged in with the administrator account to add the users).
Anyone who knows what to do?
Thanks!

That's what the error is saying - the administrator account has no mailbox, and I suspect that the EMC expects the account you are placing in that area to have one.
It's not the administrator that I want to add to the list, but the users of the board. But I'll try to create a mailbox for the administrator, for the sake of science :)
Unfortunately not, that's what I thought at first too, but I double checked and no mailbox for the administrator can be found.
Was the administrator account mail-enabled in the past however? I wonder if it was set as delegate or had send on behalf rights for one of the users you are trying to add and its ghost entry is still there.
Twitter!:
Please Note: My Posts are provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied.
Any way how I can check this? As for as I know, the administrator account never had "send on behalf rights", but of course I don't know what they've been doing in all the time since I left.

Stop all Message delivery until start-up class executes

          On fail-over, I need to be able to keep any messages from topics/queues from being
          sent to the destinations until a start-up class has been executed and initialized
          the application. The problem is that the mdb's get deployed prior to the start-up
          class and immediately receive messages. This causes problems since the mdb's
          rely on the start-up class executing prior to onMessage().
          Is there a way to disable message delivery on start-up, prior to the deployment
          of the mdb's? I have implemented a temporary solution of checking to see if the
          start-up class has been bootstrapped, and if no, do a thread sleep for a specified
          time period and repeat...


I had the same issue. We wrote a startup class that spawns a new thread to
          make a JMX call to see if the server is up. Once the server is up, the
          thread would deploy the MDB using JMX.
          Adarsh
          Looks like you came up with a good workaround.
          "Josh Zook" <[email protected]> wrote in message
          news:3cbd9fff$[email protected]..
          >
          > On fail-over, I need to be able to keep any messages from topics/queues
          from being
          > sent to the destinations until a start-up class has been executed and
          initialized
          > the application. The problem is that the mdb's get deployed prior to the
          start-up
          > class and immediately receive messages. This causes problems since the
          mdb's
          > rely on the start-up class executing prior to onMessage().
          >
          > Is there a way to disable message delivery on start-up, prior to the
          deployment
          > of the mdb's? I have implemented a temporary solution of checking to see
          if the
          > start-up class has been bootstrapped, and if no, do a thread sleep for a
          specified
          > time period and repeat...

10 million messages in one jms-queue

Hi all,
          we want to put about 10 million jms-messages in a jms-queue with a jdbc
          persistent store on oracle database.
          Does anyone of you made experiences with that much messages in one
          queue? Are there any known limitations concerning the number of
          messages, e.g. according managing overhead, etc?
          Thanks for any comment,
          Klaas

The $ is not a valid character for an element NAME per W3C standards. In short you can only use letters, numbers and the underscore ( _ )..
You need to correct this message / data and reprocess the message.
Setup an Error Queue so these messages get thrown some where that will not cause issues in your system. Then use error handling in something like AIA to report back to your support staff that a bad message was encountered, needs to be fixed and reprocessed.
You will see that if you do a google search for how to escape a dollar sign in xpath, there are no good results....
Hope that helps!
-Luke

JMS message id as JMS correlation ?

I read this document: "How to Correlate JMS Messages"
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/5059f110-0d01-0010-7c8b-fdc983be70c0
My scenario is AP1 -> XI -> SAP -> XI -> AP1, because AP1 sends lots of messages at the same time, so I need to use correlation. Current plan is we want to use JMS message id. But this document only describe to use the "XI message id", not "JMS message id".
I found in sender communication channel configuration, I can use JMS message id as the XI message id. But because I have a mapping before the BPM, it means the message received by BPM is not the message received by XI.
(detail scenario is AP1 -> XI -> mapping to another message -> BPM -> AP1.)

I got it, I can set the conversation id to the context object "ConversationID" of "http://sap.com/xi/XI/System", it's ok.

Message Delivery to JMS

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for