Message Mapping Logical Problem

Hi there I have an issue with my message mapping. My source structure looks like this.
IDOC
-Seg1
---Element1
---Element2
---Seg2
ElementA
ElementB
Ok so I have to map the IDOC to a flat file. Seg 1 is the Header and Seg2 is the Details. For each flat file there will only be 1 Seg1 but there can be X amount of Seg2s' in the flat file. My problem is mapping Element 1 to Element A. Element A has the value of Element 1 and 2 combined. It appears I cannot map a lower hierarchy to an higher hierarchy? I tried changing the context but with no luck.
Any idea?
Thanx,
Jan

My problem is mapping Element 1 to Element A.
What do you mean by this? I guess you want the Element1 to appear with each Segment occurrence. If yes, you may use standard function useOneAsMany as shown.
/people/sravya.talanki2/blog/2005/12/08/message-mapping-simplified-150-part-ii
Regards,
Prateek

Similar Messages

XI 2.0 Message Mapping Activation Problem

Hi All,
When I attempt to activate a message mapping, I receive the following message:
Activation of change list cancelled
Check Result for Object Message Mapping ZHRMD_A05toEAI | http://com.sl.xi:
*Starting Compilation
*Error while Compiling
This is a rather large IDoc, so I'm wondering if it's a memory problem. Do you know where I can "Check Result"? The actual mapping is very routine, so I don't think it's a syntax problem.
Any help is greatly appreciated!
Kind Regards,
Jeff
Message was edited by: Jeff Kocur

It does appear to be a resource issue. Following your suggestion, I ran a test and received this message:
Messages:C:\jdk1.3.1_11\bin\javac -encoding UTF8 -classpath .;.\system-lib\boot.jar;.\system-lib\jaas.jar -extdirs .\additional-lib;.\services\deploy\work\applications\ExchangeRepository -d C:\WINNT\TEMP\12_9_21_22_10_2004 C:\WINNT\TEMP\12_9_21_22_10_2004\com\sap\xi\tf\_ZHRMD_A05BtoEAIZHRMD_A05B_.java
The system is out of resources.
Consult the following stack trace for details.
java.lang.OutOfMemoryError
<<no stack trace available>>
Compilation error

Message Mapping logic ...!!

Hi Experts ,
I am working on the below scenario where my Sender System is the Oracle Database system and Receiver System is SAP ECC
basically JDBC->PI->IDOC channels i am using . I need to create the below Mapping logic in order to satisfy the Interface Requirement
Based on the Interface_Transaction_ID each Idoc has to be Created and each Idoc should have corresponding Segments and line items . based on th value of GLAccount and Vendor Account
My sender Payload is
<row>
<INTERFACE_TRANSACTION_ID>CFCV00000627</INTERFACE_TRANSACTION_ID>
<DOC_HEADER_TEXT>5251/0115/000000/0000</DOC_HEADER_TEXT>
<COMPANY_CODE>1610</COMPANY_CODE>
<DOCUMENT_DATE>20110707</DOCUMENT_DATE>
<POSTING_DATE>20110305</POSTING_DATE>
<PERIOD>3</PERIOD>
<DOCUMENT_TYPE>ZF</DOCUMENT_TYPE>
<REFERENCE>45720-T</REFERENCE>
<VENDOR_ACCOUNT></VENDOR_ACCOUNT>
<CF_MATERIAL_TYPE>MATTE</CF_MATERIAL_TYPE>
<CF_ENTRY_POINT>610 Tank</CF_ENTRY_POINT>
<CF_SOURCE>XNN</CF_SOURCE>
<PAYMENT_TERMS></PAYMENT_TERMS>
<BASELINE_DATE>20110305</BASELINE_DATE>
<ASSIGNMENT>5251/0115/000</ASSIGNMENT>
   <TEXT>USD </TEXT>
   <GL_ACCOUNT>111810</GL_ACCOUNT>
   <SPECIAL_GL_IND></SPECIAL_GL_IND>
    <PREV_DOC_NUMBER></PREV_DOC_NUMBER>
   <PREV_POSTING_DATE></PREV_POSTING_DATE>
</row>
<row>
<INTERFACE_TRANSACTION_ID>CFCV00000627</INTERFACE_TRANSACTION_ID>
<DOC_HEADER_TEXT>5251/0115/000000/0000</DOC_HEADER_TEXT>
<ASSIGNMENT>5251/0115/000</ASSIGNMENT>
   <TEXT>USD </TEXT>
   <GL_ACCOUNT>111821</GL_ACCOUNT>
   <SPECIAL_GL_IND></SPECIAL_GL_IND>
    <PREV_DOC_NUMBER></PREV_DOC_NUMBER>
   <PREV_POSTING_DATE></PREV_POSTING_DATE>
</row>
Row having GL_Account Value      E1BPACHE09,
                                                         E1BPACGL09, (GLvalue 111810)
                                                         E1BPACGL09, (GLvalue 111821)
                                                         E1BPACCR09,
                                                         E1BPACCR09,
                                                         E1PACEXTC .
                                                         Field value=CFCV00000627
Similary if Vendor_Account Value exist then only Vendor Segment (E1BPACAP09) must occur at target side
Row having Vendor_Aaccount Value
                                                         E1BPACHE09,
                                                         c (Vendor value 123)
                                                         E1BPACAP09, (Vendor Value 124)
                                                         E1BPACCR09,
                                                         E1BPACCR09,
                                                         E1PACEXTC .
                                                         Field value=CFCV00000628
I have mapped GL_ACCOUNT -
>E1BPACGL09 .
                         Vendor_Account---->E1BPACGL09.
if any one have gone through simiar mapping logic kindly share and do the needfull ...
Regards,
Aziz khan .
I

Hi ,
Here the requirement which i am looking for :
Sender Side has below value
<row>
     <INTERFACE_TRANSACTION_ID>CFCV00000627</INTERFACE_TRANSACTION_ID>
    <PERIOD>3</PERIOD>
    <DOCUMENT_TYPE>ZF</DOCUMENT_TYPE>
    <REFERENCE>45720-T</REFERENCE>
    <CF_MATERIAL_TYPE>MATTE</CF_MATERIAL_TYPE>
    <VENDOR_ACCOUNT>600046</VENDOR_ACCOUNT>
    <CF_ENTRY_POINT>610 Tank</CF_ENTRY_POINT>
    <CF_SOURCE>XNN</CF_SOURCE>
    <PAYMENT_TERMS></PAYMENT_TERMS>
    <BASELINE_DATE>20110305</BASELINE_DATE>
     <ASSIGNMENT>5251/0115/000</ASSIGNMENT>
     <GL_ACCOUNT>111810</GL_ACCOUNT>
     <USER_STATUS>TOHD</USER_STATUS>
     <PREV_POSTING_DATE></PREV_POSTING_DATE>
</row>
as you can see in the above Payload has values where Row is the Root element and under that the rest of fields occur (its a jdbc to idoc Scenario ) and here based on the Interface Trasaction ID the Idoc is generated . where each Idoc should have either GL Segment if GL Account Value has values and respectively Vendor idoc Segment has to be generated if Vendor Account details are present . the Sender Data will have either GL Account or Vendor Account value in a row not both.
below is the IDOC Strcuture how it looks for GL Account at Target side
IDOC
--->E1BPACHE09
        E1BPACGL09 (This is the GL Segment will have GL Account Line item)
        E1BPACAR09
        E1BPACAR09.
        E1BPACEXTC
          Filed1
below out put should come when Vendor Account have Value
   IDOC
        E1BPACHE09
        E1BPACAP09 (This is the Vendor Segment will have Vendor Account Line item)
        E1BPACAR09
        E1BPACAR09.
        E1BPACEXT09
          Filed1
Now when i duplicate the above Row
Like
<row>
      <INTERFACE_TRANSACTION_ID>CFCV00000627</INTERFACE_TRANSACTION_ID>
       <VENDOR_ACCOUNT></VENDOR_ACCOUNT>
       <GL_ACCOUNT>111810</GL_ACCOUNT>
</row>
<row>
      <INTERFACE_TRANSACTION_ID>CFCV00000627</INTERFACE_TRANSACTION_ID>
       <VENDOR_ACCOUNT></VENDOR_ACCOUNT>
       <GL_ACCOUNT>111811</GL_ACCOUNT>
</row>
<row>
      <INTERFACE_TRANSACTION_ID>CFCV00000627</INTERFACE_TRANSACTION_ID>
       <VENDOR_ACCOUNT></VENDOR_ACCOUNT>
       <GL_ACCOUNT>111812</GL_ACCOUNT>
</row>
I have Mapped the below fileds
Interface_Transaction_ID-->SplitByValue(EachValue)>CollapseContext>IDOC
Interface_Transaction_ID -->Filed1 (IDOC/E1BPACEXTC/Filed1)
all the above 3 Row have been duplicated the 3 Rows will have 3 interface Transaction id Value=CFCV00000627 (which is same as per the above Sender Payload ) and 3 GLAccount fields with values 111810,111811,111812 each
If i test the data i should get the below output 1
if GL account exists
IDOC 1
        E1BPACHE09
        E1BPACGL09 (This is the GL Segment with value 111810)
        E1BPACGL09 (This is the GL Segment with value 111811)
        E1BPACGL09 (This is the GL Segment with value 111812)
        E1BPACAR09
        E1BPACAR0/
        E1BPACEXTC
          Filed1 (CFCV00000627)
If Vendor account Exists then output 2 as follows
IDOC
          E1BPACHE09
         E1BPACAP09 (This is the Vendor Segment will have Vendor Account Line item)
         E1BPACAP09
         E1BPACAP09
         E1BPACAR09
         E1BPACAR09.
         E1BPACEXT09
           Filed1 (CFCV00000627)
How can i achive the above logic .
Regards,
Aziz

Message Mapping- 3 problems

Hi,
1)I need some information regarding Message Mapping. I need to map the field TDLINE of segment E1EDKT2 of IDOC ORDERS05 to the target fields. But based upon the index number of the record of this segment, I must map it to different fields (eg.E1EDKT2[10], E1EDKT2[3]). How can I incorporate this in Message Mapping?
2)And one more scenario is as follows.Use PARTN if exists or use LIFNR to map to target and it must satisfythe conidtion PARVW = AG. Should we need Java code or can we achieve this using two 'If' conditions.
3)We are looping at a source segment and it has multiple occurances.How to create multiple segments in target based on condition.
Can anyone help me.
Thanks,
Srinivas

> 1) I need to map the field TDLINE of segment E1EDKT2
> of IDOC ORDERS05 to the target fields. But based upon
> the index number of the record of this segment, I
> must map it to different fields (eg.E1EDKT2[10],
> E1EDKT2[3]). How can I incorporate this in Message
> Mapping?
You can use the index function (with SP13):
E1EDKT2* - index
                  equalS
    constant(10) /
                         ifWithoutElse - target
TDLINE - removeContexts /
check the correct context
> 2)And one more scenario is as follows. Use PARTN if
> exists or use LIFNR to map to target and it must
> satisfy the conidtion PARVW = AG. Should we need Java
> code or can we achieve this using two 'If'
> conditions.
Sure you can chain if statements:
        PARVW
              equalS
constant(AG) /
                     ifWithoutElse
              PARTN /
                   PARTN - exist - if - target
                              LIFNR
This mapping assumes, that PARVW = AG is available, when PARTN is available.
> 3)We are looping at a source segment and it has
> multiple occurances. How to create multiple
> segments in target based on condition.
Here is a pattern:
condition - createIf - target
condition has to be a queue of true and false with the same occurrency as source.
All sub nodes of source are now arranged correctly under the target node.
Regards
Stefan
Message was edited by: Stefan Grube

Message Mapping activation Problem

Hi
when i activate my message mapping , I am getting an error message like there is not enough disk space, which quite straight forwardly asks me to go and look the space of the XI drive. I looked into it and i have got only a few MB space left out(less that n 50 MB). Now what files can i delete to regain the space back?
kindly advice.
regards
krishna

NO - THIS IS YOUR DATABASE!
Do you run a backup from DB13?
if so, run redo log copy save delete - this deleted the log file after taking two copies.
The redo logs will be somewhere like
oracle\<SID>\origloga
oracle\<SID>\origlogb
oracle\<SID>\oraarch
oracle\<SID>\sapbackup
Again. run from DB13 and not delete from O/S

Message mapping logic help

Hi All
I have a source structure like this below. It's a big structure actually. I'm just pasting the relevant structure where I need your help.
</root>
     <storage>
         <id>AB</id>
         <Type>TY</storType>
         <Temp>100</Temp>
    </storage>
----</root>
My requirement is to check the value coming in <Type> and if it is TY, then the target structure will be the exactly the same
If it is XY, then the target structure will have one more field <celsius> and will look like this below.
</root>
     <storage>
         <id>AB</id>
         <Type>TY</storType>
         <Temp>100</Temp>
         <celsius>922</celsius>
    </storage>
----</root>
The <storage> complex element with elements can repeat as many times in the source XML. But the values of <Type> will be either TY or XY and I have to create the target structure accordingly. Pls help. I am using graphical message mapping
thx
mike

Hi Michael,
Please try below mapping
Regards,
Krupa

Regarding Message Mapping Logic ...!

Hi Experts ,
I am working on the the below requirement JDBC to IDoc scenarion in the mapping i need the below logic
based on the existence of the Transaciton ID . the idoc followed by the segments should be created . for ex
If Interface_Trasaction_ID= 456 THEN   Idoc 1 followed by Segments and line items
                                                                E1BPACHE09,
                                                                E1BPACCR09
                                                                E1BPACCR09,
                                                                E1PACEXTC .
                                                                    Field value=456
If Interface_Transaction_ID =457 THEN Idoc 2 followed by Segments and line items
                                                               E1BPACHE09,
                                                               E1BPACCR09
                                                               E1BPACCR09,
                                                               E1PACEXTC .
                                                                    Field value=457
To satisfy the above logic i have mapped Transaction id > SplitByValue->CollapseContext--->Idoc
But the same Mapping Logic is not working when Sender payload is triggred having Repeated Transcation_Id value ias given below if Transaction ID= 456 ,
              Transaction ID= 457,
              Transaction ID= 457,
              Transaction ID= 456 .
then output should have only 2 Idoc Followed by segments where Field Value will be 456, 457
I have mapped Transaction id -->Field Value .
let me know how can achive the above logic ...!!

Hi Aziz,
you can use UDF
Transaction IDRemoveContext-->sortUDF- SplitByValue->CollapseContext--->Idoc
public void removeDuplicate(String[] Value, ResultList result, Container container) throws StreamTransformationException{
String temp = Value[0];
result.addValue(Value[0]);
for(int i=0;i<Value.length;i++)
   if(!(Value<i>.equals(temp)))
        result.addValue(Value<i>);
   temp=Value<i>;

Error : message mapping logic in PI

Dear Team,
Please find the source and target structures..
Source ::
->MT
-->records
--->matnr
--->batch
--->submatnr(s)
Target::
->ZRFC
-->Import
--->Item
>matnr
>batch
>submatnr
1) It is SOAP to RFC scenario. In Source strcuture for one matnr , we have one or more submatnrs.
2)RFC in R/3 contains Import parameters as..matnr,batch,submatnr(onlyone).
3)I want to build mapping - for each submatnr in source I want to create one complete record in target .i.e
if matnr contains 2 submatnrs in source , i want to create 2 records at target side like
first record - matnr,batch,submatnr
second record - matnr,batch,submatnr.
here in both records the matnr and batch values are same , which we have taken from source but submatnrs changed.
Can any body help me how to build mapping.
-Drumi

Hi,
I assumed that submatnr occurance 1 to unbounded...
here is the logic
map
Submatnr----->SplibyValue(ValueChange)-->RemoveContect-->Item
matnr1---->useoneAsmany(1st argument Matnr1,second and third arugument submatnr)--->splitbyValue(EachValue)-->Matnr1.
batch1---->useoneAsmany(1st argument batch11,second and third arugument submatnr)--->splitbyValue(EachValue)-->batch1
submatnr-->removecontext-->splitbyevalue(eachvalue)--->submatnr
Regards,
Raj

Require some complex logic scenario in message mapping

Hi all,
I need some complex logic scenarios for practice in message mapping . Kindly forward some links for message mapping logic scenarios.
Thank you so much in advance.

always search sdn first....
http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/XI/MappingConceptsinSAPXI

Problem in message mapping index.

HI All,
I am doing idoc to file scenario.
I have a problem in message mapping.
Issue is,
pallet1
palletheader(here i used counter to increment the value)
palletline(here i used INDEX to increment the value)
        pallet linenumber1(it should be 1)
        pallet linenumber2(it should be 2)
so on       )
so on
pallet2
palletheader
palletline
        pallet linenumber1(here again it should be 1)
        pallet linenumber2(here again it should be 2)
so on              )
so on
In INDEX we have option called reset index in that we have two radio buttons
one is "reset index to intial value with each new context"
and next one is "donot reset index to intiak value"
if i use the first radio button which is working fine in only one pallet and more pallet lines but not more than one pallet.
If i use the second radio buttton which is working fine in more than one pallet but not satisfying the more pallet lines in one pallet.
Can you please help me on the issue

my requirement is like this.
IF DELVRY05/IDOC/E1EDL20/E1EDL24/POSNR equals to /DELVRY05/IDOC/E1EDL20/E1EDL37/E1EDL44/EXIDV
then map to 'pallet line' .
I tried to keep posnr context as E1EDL20 and also IDOC level.
And at the same way to EXIDV too.
pallet(1 to unbounded)
   pallet header(1 to 1)
   pallet lines(1 to 1)
        in sub level pallet line(1 to unbounded) (here i applied the index logic)
The out put should be pallet line 1,2,3,----- so on
In the second pallet the pallet lines should be again 1,2,3,4-------so on .
But when i try to apply thsi logic,
I am getting only one pallet line instead of two.
second is not comming .
please help on this i am facing this problem for the long time back.
if i solve then i can complete my scenario.

Require a Message mapping for this Logic.

Hi Experts,
I require a Message mapping for this Logic.
In the Source there are 4 fields and, the Target side, the fields should appear like this.
Source Structure- File
Record
|-> Header
Order_No
Date
|-> Item
Mat_No
Quantity
Target Structure-IDoc
IDoc
|-> Header
|-> Segment
Delivery_Order_No
Recv_Date
|-> Item
|-> Segment
Delivery_Order_No
Material_Num
Recv_Quantity.
The Logic is for every Order number an IDOC is generated.And if the Material num matches then the quantity should be added. and important note is that the material numbers are different for every order number. That means if a material number is 2 in the order number A. Then the material number can never be 2 in any of the order numbers.Here is the following with an example for the above scenario.
For example:-
we have
Source Structure- File
Order-no Date Mat_No Quantity
1 01/02/2011 A 10
1 01/02/2011 B 15
1 01/02/2011 A 10
2 01/02/2011 C 10
2 01/02/2011 C 10
3 01/02/2011 D 20
3 01/02/2011 D 10
3 01/02/2011 E 25
Target Structure-IDoc
Delivery_Order_No Recv_Date Material_Num Recv_Quantity
1 01/02/2011 A 20
1 01/02/2011 B 15
2 01/02/2011 C 20
3 01/02/2011 D 30
3 01/02/2011 E 25
So for this example total of 5-Idocs created. That means for this example if Order_No is 1 When the Mat_No is A the quantity gets added. For this Scenario 1 IDoc with four Fields 2 in Header(Delivery_Order_No, Recv_Date) and 2 in Item(Material_Num, Recv_Quantity) is generated by adding the quantity field in the Target Side. Similarly if Order_No is 1 when the Mat_No is B then separate IDoc is generated with four Fields 2 in Header(Delivery_Order_No, Recv_Date) and 2 in Item(Material_Num, Recv_Quantity) in the Target Side. Similarly, if Order_No is 2 when the Mat_No is C, an IDoc is generated with four Fields 2 in Header(Delivery_Order_No, Recv_Date) and 2 in Item(Material_Num, Recv_Quantity) by adding the quantity field in the Target Side. ike wise the process goes on upto 3.Kindly do the needy..
Thanq very much in advance..
Edited by: Prashanth Bharadwaj on Oct 17, 2011 1:29 PM

Hi Prashanth,
Concatinate the two fields OrderNo and MaterialNo and follow the below logic which will resolve your problem.
concatinationOfOrderNo&MaterialNo>removecontext>sort>splitByValueChange>collapseContext-->IDOC
concatinationOfOrderNo&MaterialNo>removecontext>sort>splitByValueChange>collapseContext>splitByEachValue>subString(0,1)-->Delivery_Order_No
formatByExample>collapseContext>SplitByEachValue-->Recv_Date
FormatByExample:
input1:resulrOfSortByKey
input2:concatination>removecontext>sort-->SplitByValuChange
sortByKey:
input1:concatination-->removecontext
input2:date-->removecontext
concatinationOfOrderNo&MaterialNo>removecontext>sort>splitByValueChange>collapseContext>splitByEachValue>subString(1,1)-->Material_Num
formatByExample>sum>Recv_Quantity
FormatByExample:
input1:sortByKey
input2:concatination>removecontext>sort-->SplitByValueChange
SortByKey:
input1:concatination-->removecontext
input2:Quantity-->removeContext
Regards,
Priyanka.

Severe Problem With Message Mapping

Hi,
I have got a message mapping which results in the following XML:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<ns14:expost_generation xmlns:ns14="http://mywebsite.xsd">
<timeStamp>2006-03-15T15:27:16</timeStamp>
<source name="xyz">
    <generation date="abc" value="def" />
    <generation date="abc" value="def" />
    <generation date="abc" value="def" />
</source>
</ns14:expost_generation>
My problem is that I have to suppres the ns14 prefix. The opening tag should be: <expost_generation xmlns="http://mywebsite.xsd">
The closing tag: </expost_generation>
Does anybody know how to achieve this?
Kind regards,
Heiko

Hi Heiko,
on the level of the expost_generation-Tag the two definitions you gave are logically equivalent. Hence, no software consuming the XMLs should prefer one style.
However, when we look at the subelements there is a great difference.
In the xml you posted first all subelements (timeStamp, source,...) lie in no namespace.
On the other hand when you declare the tag expost_generation as you described afterwards (with a default namespace declaration) and then proceed as in the first example, then all the subelements will lie in this namespace, too (unless you again reset the default namespace in all these elements).
I assume that the Schema you use in the Message Mapping describes a document with only the root being namespace qualified but the service consuming the document expects a document with all tags being namespace qualified.
Greetings
Stephan

Problem while activating message mapping

Hi all,
I am facing a problem while activating message mapping in IR.It says Object being edited by XXXX and cannot be activated.It's giving my user name itself and even it doesn't allow to go to edit mode even.But I am not opening it twice.How to monitor all the XI users logged into the XI system and find the users using IR and ID objects.Please help in this regard.
Thanks.

Hi Jaya
It is .....
http://<host:port>/rep/support/public/LockAdminService
Hope this helps !!!
Regards,
J Augastine

Problem in message Mapping SAP PI 7.1

Hi Experts,
I have a problem in my Message Mapping,
Design: [Design|http://www.life-4-music.de/prob.jpg]
Messagemapping: [MappingTest|http://www.life-4-music.de/probII.jpg]
The Problem is, that ElementC from SourceMessage occours "0 to n" times in Element A, but I need to check every ElementC in ElementA to TargetElementA with a IF Statement.
I tried a lot of things, like change the CONTEXT of the ELEMENT or use SPLIT BY VALUE but without success.
Rgds,
Steffen

Hello, thanks a lot for the fast awnser. I tried this allready to change the Context of the Elements "system" in this Mapping: Changed Context
For Example in one field I check for Entry "ERP" in Source Field "system" , if "ERP" is in the first ELEMENT then it will be mapped correctly: Example ERP works
But If "ERP" is in an element below, then it doesn´t work, so it seems to be, that he only map the first occurrence of the Elements. : Example SCADA don´t work
Here is the View of the QUEUE from the don´t working Example: Show QUEUE of not working Example
maybe u have a tip for me again , because I´m allready desperate
Thanks a lot.
Rgds,
Steffen

Problem by transporting the message mapping from PI 7.0 to PI 7.1

Hi Everyone,
by transporting the message mapping from PI 7.0 to PI 7.1 i have got the following problem.
"Source code has syntax error:
K:\usr\sap\E71\DVEBMGS00\j2ee\cluster\serve......
package udfpool does not exist
import udfpool.*;
i have used a UDF in my message mapping.
This UDF calls for a method of a java class, which is imported as a .jar file with this message mapping.
this message mapping works very well on PI 7.0,
but doesn't work any more on PI 7.1 because of the problem described above.
anyone can help me out of this problem?
thanks!
zc

hi,
but did you import the jar archive to 7.1 first?
Regards,
Michal Krawczyk
http://mypigenie.com XI/PI FAQ

Message Mapping Logical Problem

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for