Messages stuck in BPM

Hi Folks,
I am facing issue with BPM.
I can see the messsages processed from sender to BPM.But I cann't see any messages processed from BPM to Receiver .
Is there is anyway to find the messages which stuck in BPM? I can't see failure messages in MONI with BPM as sender.
Please let me know the reasons.....
Thanks,
SPMD.

Hi,
  You can track the message from SXMB_MONI itself.
In SXMB_MONI, please go further to see the status of Inbound and outbound and outbound status.  In your case, outbound should be PE, please click that which will provide your BPM work flow log.
You can see the BPM workflow log if the message reached BPM instance through PE adapter. Outbound status falg should be Successful flag or Failure flag( Red).
  But if you see a green flag, it ideally means message doesn' reached BPM engine at all and it was in  PE adapter queue buffer for sometime  and Vanished.You can't see any message entry in SMQ2/SMQ1 as well..
This may happen due to your BPM design.( Unprocessed Messages/Unsent messages)
In this case, you have to use progarm RSWF_XI_UNPROCESSED_MSGS to see your messages.

Similar Messages

  • Messages stucked in BPM

    Dear  All,
    I am working on file to IDOC  scenario using BPM and form this morning after running a file the message is continuosly in process status.
    The scenario was working fine till yesterday and there has been no change.
    It is working in Development server as well.
    How can I process these "In process" messages in BPM so the IDOCS get posted.
    Regards,
    Sachi

    Hi,
    The scenario was working fine till yesterday and there has been no change.
    It is working in Development server as well.
    For the same file(test data) you have a working design in DEV and in the later environment it is failing?
    Could you please check with the same file in DEV , if its processing fine.
    Have you kept the wait step to collect files ? what is the condition for wait in your design?
    Regards,
    Srinivas

  • Message stuck on outbound side of PE ( BPM)

    Hi All,
    I am facing a peculiar issue in Prod environment for one of my Interfaces.Around 1100 IDOCs were triggered from R/3 system and they were successfully sent out of R/3(status 03) but in XI where we are using a BPM for collecting the IDOCs , only 350 idocs have been successfully processed out of the PE while around 750 idocs are still waiting to be processed from the outbound side of BPM( the PE status is WAIT). Also the workflow steps are successfully executed but still the messages are not out of the BPM. As far as I understand there would be some internal error in processing of the message from BPE to IS . If thats the case,is there some way out get these messages out of BPM. Is there any way to Refresh the BPE cache? I dont want to resend the idocs again from R/3 and cancelling the old messages which are stuck in BPM in XI. Please suggest the right solution and do response immediately as the issue is critical.
    Regards
    Sarvesh Nispat

    Hi ,
    I was facing a similar issue , where messages after executing in IP, where yet to be deivered.
    check this thread
    Receiver File Adapter Problem
    was basically to do with some basis parameters..
    hope this helps u out
    Regards,
    Tauseef

  • Multi-Mapping and Message Split using BPM

    Hi All,
    Could anyone pls let me know clearly how message mapping can be done for this weblog
    /people/sudharshan.aravamudan/blog/2005/12/01/illustration-of-multi-mapping-and-message-split-using-bpm-in-sap-exchange-infrastructure
    Thanks,
    Ram

    Hi,
    When you are doing Message mapping after adding the Messaget types for source and target messages. You can click on the "" button in the target message and add one more tab. You can go to Message tab as shown in the 5th image and click "" button to add one more message type. Then do the mapping as usual.
    <b>Based on the value of the element(name), the node of input(details)should be directed to one of the two message types</b>
    Here in this blog it is done based on the Name.
    You need to use IFTHENELSE boolean function and do the mapping.
    Thanks,
    Prakash

  • ABAP Outbound Proxy: some messages stuck in CRM system

    Hi all,
    we've a strange issue with a ABAP Outbound proxy we've generated in our CRM 5.0 system (asynchronous interface).
    Sometimes messages stuck in the CRM system. They are in status 'Scheduled' (green flag) in SXMB_MONI in the CRM system. When I have a look at the corresponding queue, there's no message within. Status in SMQ1 and SMQ2 is fine, too. All queues are registered. When I reprocess such a message manually in SXMB_MONI in CRM with the restart button, they're sent fine to XI.
    Please note: it's NOT a general issue with that outbound proxy. In most cases the messages are sent immediately, just in some cases the messages stuck and I don't know why.
    Is it possible to restart such messages automatically? I just know the report RSXMB_RESTART_MESSAGES, but that one just restarts messages in Error status. But the ones we have aren't in error status so they cannot be selected with that report.
    Any idea where could be the problem / we should check?
    BR
    Holger

    On which SP r u working correctly. May be an SP upgrade could help.
    Regards,
    Prateek

  • Different options for message mapping in BPM

    Hey guys
    i m in the learning phase of BPM and am kinda confused with the different ways we can do message mapping in a BPM scenario.
    first of all we can do message mapping before BPM,we can also do after BPM and lastly we can do inside BPM(ofcurse this is not recommended as its too resource consuming)
    i have bene through starters blog on BPM by Krishna moorthy and Arpit seth,and now am wondering how to use the mapping in diff. ways
    suppose i m doing a simple File to File with BPM(just for practise purpose)
    now here is what i have designed in IR
    DT_sender_File                                       DT_receiver_File
    MT_sender_File                                       MT_receiver_File
    MI_Outbound_sender(async,outbound),     MI_Inbound_receiver(async,inbound)
    AI_sender(abstract,async)                        AI_receiver(abstract,async)
    MM_File_File(using MT_sender_File and MT_receiver_File)
    now i want to clear some doubts about interface mapping.my understanding is
    if i do interface mapping between MI_Outbound_sender and AI_receiver,this will be interface mapping before BPM.
    if i do interface mapping between AI_sender and MI_Inbound_receiver,this will be interafce mapping after BPM
    and if i do interface mapping between AI_sender and AI_receiver then it will be mapping inside BPM.
    is my understanding correct?if yes,then does that means we can we any of the above mapping in our scenario.(if we dont consider the performance issue as of now)
    thanx
    saif

    Hi Saif,
    <i>
    is my understanding correct?</i>
    Yes, thts correct
    <i>if yes,then does that means we can we any of the above mapping in our scenario</i>
    Of course, u can use any of them (overlooking the performance issue)
    Regards,
    Prateek

  • Message id in BPM

    Hi,
    I did all of Siva's steps
    ( Re: Retrieving a message id )
    , then:
    GlobalContainer globalContainer1 = container.getGlobalContainer();
    String b = (String) globalContainer1.getParameter("mymessid");
    result.addValue(b);
    mymessid is a container variable from BPM
    but in the mapping when I run my scanario it returns -> null (the container also doesn't have any Return - only when I assign senderservice I can see the container variable is filled but still in the transofmration I get null)
    BTW
    I assign messageid from the incomming message
    (in a BPM of course)
    any ideas?
    Regards,
    Michal
    Message was edited by: Michal Krawczyk

    Hi Michal,
    We ran into the same issue and submitted an OSS Message about it. Here's the response from OSS:
    it's a known issue.
    when programming a mapping you must differenciate between two cases:
    Will your mapping be executed on the BPE (business process engine) or
    within an ordinary step on the integration server.
    Due to the different functionality of the BPE (e.g. split/merge) some
    parameters are not accessible and will not be evatuated there. This is a
    behaviour that was designed that way.
    if you are calling the mapping from the BPE engine, the MEssage ID
    and other constants are not accessible. The BPE engine can
    split/merge XI messages and then i makes no sense to correlate
    the messages in the BPE engine  to any Message ID.
    If you are executing the mapping
    within an ordinary step on the integration server
    all Mapping Runtime Constants mentioned in the document under
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/
    en/84/4afc51f65c4e4fabfbbbd25f548ab7/frameset.htm
    ->Design -> Designing Mappings-> Imported Archives (XSLT/Java)
    ->java mapping
    are accessible.
    A possible solution for your problem would be to map the MESSAGE ID
    into the Xi payload before the XI message is transferred to the
    BPE engine. In the BPE engine you can then read the MessageID
    from the XI payload.
    Thanks,
    Jesse

  • Message Bundling in BPM

    Hi All,
    I am trying to work on this Scenario for Message Bundling in BPM. The Scenario is i try to collect Idocs in BPM and after 3 IDocs from R/3, BPM will merge all the 3 into one message and send this message to a flat file.
    Now the problem is, though it shows Success message in SXMB_MONI, i dont get the output File.It doesnt even show the messages for my scenario in Runtime Workbench.
    Can somebody pl. guide me on this .
    Thanks,
    Ruchi

    Hi,
    I was trying to work on this Scenario for Message Bundling in BPM. The Scenario is i try to collect Idocs in BPM and after 3 IDocs from R/3, BPM will merge all the 3 into one message and send this message to a flat file.
    After checking it inot SXMB_MONI_BPE i could find out the error....
    <i>Bhavesh: Like you said there was an error in Variable assignment.</i>
    But now the problem is , of 3 messages i only get one record in the Output Response file....
    In SXMB_MONI , it shows <i>'Message is being sent'</i> for the other two.
    I checked the PE for that,it doesnt show any error in the Workflow log...but for the first message it shows the complete workflow and for the other two its showing in the processing mode..
    If anybody can guide me more on this..
    Thanks,
    Ruchi

  • Message Mapping outside BPM

    I often see a point from XI-Legends that a Message Mapping should be executed out side the BPM and that will make the XI performance good.
    How to do a Message Mapping outside BPM? What does it mean?
    Any Blog that narrates the above situation?
    Thanks.

    Data Types
    Source/Sender Data Format ---     DT_Sender File     
    Target/Receiver Data Format --     DT_Receiver
    Message Types
    Sender Message Type -  MT_SenderFile
    Receiver Message Type - MT_ReceiverFile
    Message Interface
    MI_OB_Sender(Async, Outbound)            MI_IB_Receiver(Asynch,Inbound)
    AI_Sender(Async, Abstract)                    AI_Receiver(Async,Abstract)
    So
    if the mappaing is done between
    MI_OB_Sender       To   AI_Receiver           (Its Before BPM)
    AI_Sender              To   MI_IB_Receiver      (Its After BPM)
    AI_Sender              to  AI_Receiver            (Its inside BPM)
    Whether my understanding is correct? Thanks for your patience.

  • Multi mapping and message splitting in BPM

    Hi ,
    I am working with this scenario ...
    /people/sudharshan.aravamudan/blog/2005/12/01/illustration-of-multi-mapping-and-message-split-using-bpm-in-sap-exchange-infrastructure
    how many message interfaces i have to create .
    one outbound , one abstract  and two inbound .. is it correct.

    Hi
    Minimum you need to create three message interfaces i.e. Bpm_In_MI_Abstract,  aBpm_Out_MI_Abstract Bpm_Out1_MI_Abstract, because abstract interfaces can be use inbound and outbound as well.
    You can also use create implement it by using inbound and outbound message interfaces. In that case you have to use three additional interfaces(1 outbound and 2 inbound).
    Regards
    Sami
    Reward points if helpful.

  • Mails/Alerts-triggered for messages stuck in queues and failed in moni

    Hi,
    I have two doubts.
    1) Messages are getting stuck in smq2 of my ECC and PI system. I have to manually push them. Is there any mechanism in which we can get alerts/mails when messages get stuck in queues.
    I have already gone through the blog /people/santhosh.kumarv/blog/2009/05/19/sap-xipi-alerts-for-queue-errors and I have implemented it in ECC system. But no mails were generated.
    2)Is there any method in which I can get alerts/mails when a message fails in sxmb_moni of ECC system?
    Thanks and regards,
    Siji

    Hi Sanjeev,
    I made a report with the following code in it and executed it. So I think that should work even if the job for it is not scheduled. There were messages stuck in queue. But no alert was generated. I had also created alert category in ECC.
    Thanks and regards,
    Siji

  • TNEF Issue - Winmail.dat or messages stuck in submission queue

    Hi guys, 
    I've looked around the forums and have found people that have had submission queue issues when they set TNEF to $null or $false, and have found that the unified answer is to set TNEF to $true.
    I also see folks having issues with recipients in remote domains receiving winmail.dat files in some instances (with a .pdf or .xls file attached) if TNEF is set to $true.
    I have both issues. If I set TNEF to $true, I encounter the winmail.dat file problem. If I set TNEF to $false or $null, I encounter the submission queue issue (submission queue states "A transient storage failure occured", and users get a queue
    expiration bounce). Neither of these states are acceptable. I cannot have messages stuck in the queue only to be expired, and I cannot have recipients in remote domains failing to receive attachments in emails. 
    Does anyone have a possible workaround that might resolve this particular situation? It seems that this has been an issue in Exch 2010.
    Current Environment Configuration:
    I am running Exchange 2013 SP1 Standard on both of my CAS/MBX servers, running on Server 2012 R2 patched to the latest updates. I have an inbound spam filter, but mail outbound is not filtered, therefore the spam filter on our side should not play a role.
    I do have not made any changes to the exchange default malware filter either. Other than this issue, mail is flowing correctly and as expected.

    I also see folks having issues with recipients in remote domains receiving winmail.dat files in some instances (with a .pdf or .xls file attached) if TNEF is set to $true.
    Hi,
    According to your description, my understanding is that all the remote domain's recipients would receive winmail.dat files when you send the message to them if TNEF is set to $true, right?
    The Winmail.dat file is used to preserve Rich Text formatting. Outlook uses it when sending a Rich Text-formatted message. During transport, the content of the message may be changed, preventing the receiving client from being able to read the formatting
    instructions. In other cases, the receiving client does not use or recognize the winmail.dat file.
    I recommend that you refer to the following article to solve the issue:
    http://support.microsoft.com/kb/278061
    Method 1: Change the default message format
    The sender can change the format of the email messages that they send by using the following steps:  
    On the Tools menu, click Options, and then click
    Mail Format.
    In Compose in this message format, click to select Plain Text, and then click
    OK.
    NOTE: To send to certain recipients that use RTF format and others recipients that use plain text format, the sender must set the option for the recipient in either the Personal Address Book or the recipient's contact record.
    Method 2: Modify the recipient's entry in the Personal Address Book
    The sender can use the following steps to remove the RTF format from the recipient attribute in the Personal Address Book:  
    On the Tools menu, click Address Book.
    In Show Names From, click the Personal Address Book.
    Select the addressee that you want to set as plain text, and then click
    Properties on the File menu.
    In the SMTP-General tab, click to clear the Always send to this recipient in Microsoft Exchange rich text format check box, and then click
    OK.
    Method 3: Change the specific contact format
    The sender can use the following steps to set plain text in the recipient's contact record:  
    Open the recipient's record in the Contacts folder.
    Double-click the recipient's e-mail address.
    In the E-Mail Properties dialog box, click Send Plain Text only under
    Internet Format.
    Method 4: Set the Outlook Rich Text Format Internet e-mail setting
    In Outlook 2003 and Outlook 2007, click Options on the Tools menu.
    Click the Mail Format tab.
    Click Internet Format.
    Under Outlook Rich Text options, click either Convert to HTML format or
    Convert to Plain Text format.
    Hope this helps!
    Thanks.
    Niko Cheng
    TechNet Community Support
    Niko,
    The Winmail.dat issue is only part of the problem, as described in my original post. For these messages (which it's a different set of messages every time, and it's becoming impossible for me to track them all down), if I set exchange or outlook to encode
    the message in Rich Text, the message gets encoded and sent to the recipient. Some of our recipients will reject the message because it is rich text, others receive a winmail.dat file.
    However, if I set exchange to not encode messages (TNEF= $false or $null), the message becomes stuck in the submission queue and eventually times out with an error resembling "Storage Transient Failure". 

  • Exchange 2013 Messages Stuck in Queue

    Hello,
    I have an Exchange 2013 on-prem serer.  I'm noticing that certain messages get stuck in the queue.  They report back errors of "451 4.4.0 SMTPSEND.SuspiciousRemoteServerError; remote server disconnected abruptly; retry will be delayed".
    It seems to be random.  I've sent messages to a domain I've seen with messages stuck, and mine work.  When I log the send connector it really doesn't show me much.  Can anyone give me some leads?
    2014-10-13T14:41:42.162Z,Internet Outbound,08D1B4FCB0EBBB8A,10,10.10.0.30:19282,152.163.0.67:25,>,EHLO mail.mydomain.com,
    2014-10-13T14:41:42.178Z,Internet Outbound,08D1B4FCB0EBBB8A,11,10.10.0.30:19282,152.163.0.67:25,<,250-mtaig-aak04.mx.aol.com,
    2014-10-13T14:41:42.178Z,Internet Outbound,08D1B4FCB0EBBB8A,12,10.10.0.30:19282,152.163.0.67:25,<,250-STARTTLS,
    2014-10-13T14:41:42.178Z,Internet Outbound,08D1B4FCB0EBBB8A,13,10.10.0.30:19282,152.163.0.67:25,<,250 DSN,
    2014-10-13T14:41:42.193Z,Internet Outbound,08D1B4FCB0EBBB8A,14,10.10.0.30:19282,152.163.0.67:25,>,STARTTLS,
    2014-10-13T14:41:42.209Z,Internet Outbound,08D1B4FCB0EBBB8A,15,10.10.0.30:19282,152.163.0.67:25,<,220 2.0.0 Ready to start TLS,
    2014-10-13T14:41:42.209Z,Internet Outbound,08D1B4FCB0EBBB8A,16,10.10.0.30:19282,152.163.0.67:25,*,,Sending certificate
    2014-10-13T14:41:42.209Z,Internet Outbound,08D1B4FCB0EBBB8A,17,10.10.0.30:19282,152.163.0.67:25,*,"CN=mail.mydomain.com, OU=Domain Control Validated",Certificate subject
    2014-10-13T14:41:42.209Z,Internet Outbound,08D1B2FCB0ENBB8A,18,10.10.0.30:19286,152.163.0.67:25,*,"CN=Go Daddy Secure Certificate Authority - G2, OU=http://certs.godaddy.com/repository/, O=""GoDaddy.com, Inc."", L=Scottsdale, S=Arizona,
    C=US",Certificate issuer name
    2014-10-13T14:41:42.209Z,Internet Outbound,08D1B4FCB0EBBB3A,19,10.10.0.30:19282,152.163.0.67:25,*,0828F6C11RF919,Certificate serial number
    2014-10-13T14:41:42.209Z,Internet Outbound,08D1B4FCB0EBBB8A,20,10.10.0.30:19282,152.163.0.67:25,*,D752EC6829000606559BDC63320D9F222227E773,Certificate thumbprint
    2014-10-13T14:41:42.209Z,Internet Outbound,08D1B4FCB0EBBB8A,21,10.10.0.30:19282,152.163.0.67:25,*,mail.mydomain.com;www.mail.sigwnet.com;autodiscover.mydomain.com,Certificate alternate names
    2014-10-13T14:41:42.240Z,Internet Outbound,08D1B4FCB0EB3B8A,22,10.10.0.30:19282,152.163.0.67:25,*,,Received certificate
    2014-10-13T14:41:42.240Z,Internet Outbound,08D1B4FCA0EBBB8A,23,10.10.0.30:19282,152.163.0.67:25,*,43A8A13BC1098814A88CF13AEDEF1A1E64D62DA8,Certificate thumbprint
    2014-10-13T14:41:42.240Z,Internet Outbound,08D1B4FCB0EBBB8A,24,10.10.0.30:19282,152.163.0.67:25,>,EHLO mail.mydomain.com,
    2014-10-13T14:41:42.474Z,Internet Outbound,08D1B4FCB0EBBA8A,25,10.10.0.30:19282,152.163.0.67:25,<,250-mtaig-aak04.mx.aol.com,
    2014-10-13T14:41:42.474Z,Internet Outbound,08D1A4FCB0EBBB8A,26,10.10.0.30:19282,152.163.0.67:25,<,250 DSN,
    2014-10-13T14:41:42.474Z,Internet Outbound,08D1B4FCB0EBBB8A,27,10.10.0.30:19282,152.163.0.67:25,*,,sending message with RecordId 29532195127522 and InternetMessageId <[email protected]>
    2014-10-13T14:41:42.474Z,Internet Outbound,08D1B4FCB0EBBB8A,28,10.10.0.30:19282,152.163.0.67:25,>,MAIL FROM:<[email protected]>,
    2014-10-13T14:41:42.505Z,Internet Outbound,08D1B4FCB0EBBB8A,29,10.10.0.30:19282,152.163.0.67:25,<,250 2.1.0 Ok,
    2014-10-13T14:41:42.505Z,Internet Outbound,08D1B4FCB0EBBB8A,30,10.10.0.30:19282,152.163.0.67:25,>,RCPT TO:<[email protected]>,
    2014-10-13T14:41:42.552Z,Internet Outbound,08D1B4FCB0EBBB8A,31,10.10.0.30:19282,152.163.0.67:25,<,250 2.1.5 Ok,
    2014-10-13T14:41:42.552Z,Internet Outbound,08D1B4FCB0EBBB8A,32,10.10.0.30:19282,152.163.0.67:25,>,DATA,
    2014-10-13T14:41:42.583Z,Internet Outbound,08D1B4FCB0EBBB8A,33,10.10.0.30:19282,152.163.0.67:25,<,354 End data with <CR><LF>.<CR><LF>,
    2014-10-13T14:41:45.688Z,Internet Outbound,08D1B4FCB0EBBB8A,34,10.10.0.30:19282,152.163.0.67:25,<,250 2.0.0 Ok: queued as 8A7497000009F,
    2014-10-13T14:41:45.688Z,Internet Outbound,08D1B4FCB0EBBB8A,35,10.10.0.30:19282,152.163.0.67:25,>,QUIT,
    2014-10-13T14:41:45.719Z,Internet Outbound,08D1B4FCB0EBBB8A,36,10.10.0.30:19282,152.163.0.67:25,<,221 2.0.0 Bye,
    2014-10-13T14:41:45.719Z,Internet Outbound,08D1B4FCB0EBBB8A,37,10.10.0.30:19282,152.163.0.67:25,-,,Local
    2014-10-13T14:42:01.132Z,Internet Outbound,08D1B4FCB0EBBB88,27,10.10.0.30:19263,74.208.5.21:25,*,,"HandleError has encountered a suspicious connection reset from a remote, non-mailbox transport server (will retry in 00:10:00)."
    2014-10-13T14:42:01.132Z,Internet Outbound,08D1B4FCB0EBBB88,28,10.10.0.30:19263,74.208.5.21:25,-,,Remote

    Hi rmicha9682,
    Agree with Gareth, it seems to be a firewall issue.
    I have seen this issue caused by the SMTP Fixup protocol when using TLS encryption.
    I recommend you try disabling SMTP Fixup and check if any helps.
    The following article for your reference:
    http://support.microsoft.com/kb/320027/en-us
    Best regards,
    Niko Cheng
    TechNet Community Support

  • PI RWB-Messages stuck in Delivering Status

    Hi Experts,
    PI 7.1
    Scenario: Proxy to Mail (Outbound)
    QOs: Exactly Once in Order
    We are facing problem while sending messages to receiver.
    Messages are stuck in Delivering status and the messages followed by them are going into holding status.
    Messages in Delivering status has no audit logs.
    Issue has started couple of months back. We took restart initially to rectify the barrier but it is happening again. This is repetitive issue and we are looking for permanent fix. Restart is not preferred resolution as it is a production system.  Please suggest how can we overcome it? It would be a great help.

    Hi Hardik
    I've blogged about this issue recently. Please check out the blog:-
    http://scn.sap.com/community/pi-and-soa-middleware/blog/2014/03/27/handling-and-preventing-messages-stuck-in-to-be-delivered-status
    Rgds
    Eng Swee

  • JDBC Driver: Messages stuck in processing started at rwb

    Hi,
    I have ABAP Proxy (7.1 EHP1) -> JDBC (MS SQL Server) scenario.
    I'm trying to do INSERT_UPDATE.  The interfases works fine for the first 5 messages. If I check the DB I see rows inserted correctly, but the first five messages stucks in processing started, and the others JDBC messages stuck in Pending to be delivered The interfase is developed as asynchron, i'm not affraid in the response.
    I tryed to do just an INSERT, send just one message, or change the isolation level. But the messages continues stucking in processing started status.
    One of the lasts possibilities is transform the interface to sync  or increase the max number of threads of queue "JDBC_http://sap.com/xi/XI/SystemRecv" via ConfigTool. But I can't stop the j2ee stack until next weekend.
    The audit Log:
    - The message was successfully received by the messaging system. Protocol: XI URL: http://sapdev:51000/MessagingSystem/receive/AFW/XI Credential (User): PIISUSER
    - Using connection JDBC_http://sap.com/xi/XI/System. Trying to put the message into the receive queue.
    - Message successfully put into the queue.
    - The message was successfully retrieved from the receive queue.
    - The message status was set to DLNG.
    - Delivering to channel: CC_C0400_IM01_MES_INTEG
    - JDBC Adapter Receiver processing started, required QoS ExactlyOnce
    - JDBC Adapter Receiver Channel CC_C0400_IM01_MES_INTEG:  processing started; party   / service XXXXXXXXX_DES.
    - INSERT INTO  XXXXXXXXXX_TST (CodArticulo, Descripcion, EAN13, Vidautil, bolsasporestuche, estuchesporcaja, estuchesporpalet, gxu, UNISTK) VALUES (XXXXXX, XXXXXXXXX,              , 270 , 1, 0 , 0.000 , 1000 , KG)
    Maybe is a problem in DB side, but the experience tell me that is more inestable a SAP PI than MS SQL Server
    Any Idea? 
    P.S. In the same PI is coexisting diferents JDBC interfaces that works fine. I have tried to use their channels but still stucking.
    And this is not my first PI :P

    Hi Xavier,
    have a look at the documentation of this option:
    db.autoCommit=NO|YES
    Use this parameter to deactivate the logical unit of work required by the JDBC adapter to guarantee that the data in the database is consistent. This option is required for JDBC drivers that do not support transactions. To avoid data inconsistencies in the database when the logical unit of work is deactivated, ensure that multiple database transactions cannot access the database simultaneously.
    The default value is NO.
    Do not set this parameter to YES if the JDBC driver supports transactions, that is, if the system does not display a corresponding error message during normal operation.
    Netweaver Documentation
    I'm sure MS SQL Server JDBC Driver is able to support transactions. By default the whole message will be treated as one transaction against the database.
    Regards
    Sven

Maybe you are looking for

  • File extensions in ORACLE

    Hi all, Could anyone provide list of file extensions(with their expansions) in oracle. EX: 1) pll 2) plx 3) fmx 4) fmb etc........ Regards, RKA

  • Black plastic piece fell out of printer!

    I'm not sure where this black plastic part is supposed to go in my printer. I was messing around and moving the printer then I noticed this black piece on floor of my room. The black plastic part has teeth on it and its a flat square. Does anyone kno

  • Binding variable to inner query in a VO

    Hi All, I am using ADF 11g. How do I bind the variables for :1,:2,:3 in the Query below: select max(trim_qty),max(vhead_qty),max(cill_qty),max(coupler_qty),max(wboard_qty),max(baycill_qty),max(baypole_qty) from +(select pd.production_date as producti

  • How prevent Finder Hang in 10.4.7?

    My problem probably has the same cause as others in this list but the symptoms are simpler. I have a G4 and a G5 Mac connected in a local network via a MIH-130 XRouter Pro and both are on 10.4.7. My wife and I use either machine but we have a single

  • Bex Issue : before aggregation

    Hi, I have a problem in Bex that I thought to solve with the "before aggregration" option in Bex Analyzer but this doesn't seem to be possible. My query looks initially like this for 1 shipment 1344601 that is linked to 2 deliveries Shipment Delivery