MGCP and H323 redundancy calling issue......

I have call Manager 7.1 and there is 2 MGCP gateways registered on the CUCM. Each gateway has 1 PRI line and this setup is working fine. Now I am adding new PRI line for redundancy prospect. So I had added the new E1 card for each gateway and then I have created the H323 trunk between the Voice gateway and CUCM. I have configured the Route Group and Route list for MGCP and H323.If primary MGCP is down call auto routed to H323.
Now when MGCP is down, call is auto routed to H323 and its hitting on the proper PRI port but call is not getting established and incoming is working fine.
Kindly find the isdn debug for your reference:
DEL-2921-ROUTER(config)#
DEL-2921-ROUTER(config)# debug isdn q931
Jan 31 16:52:34.655: ISDN Se0/0/0:15 Q931: Ux_DLRelInd: DL_REL_IND received from L2
Jan 31 16:52:44.655: ISDN Se0/0/0:15 Q931: Ux_DLRelInd: DL_REL_IND received from L2
Jan 31 16:52:47.267: ISDN Se0/2/0:15 Q931: Applying typeplan for sw-type 0x12 is 0x0 0x0, Calling num 6272
Jan 31 16:52:47.267: ISDN Se0/2/0:15 Q931: Sending SETUP callref = 0x00AC callID = 0x802D switch = primary-net5 interface = User
Jan 31 16:52:47.267: ISDN Se0/2/0:15 Q931: TX -> SETUP pd = 8 callref = 0x00AC
Sending Complete
Bearer Capability i = 0x8090A3
Standard = CCITT
Transfer Capability = Speech
Transfer Mode = Circuit
Transfer Rate = 64 kbit/s
Channel ID i = 0xA9839F
Exclusive, Channel 31
Calling Party Number i = 0x0081, '6272'
Plan:Unknown, Type:Unknown
Called Party Number i = 0x80, '09821444335'
Plan:Unknown, Type:Unknown
Jan 31 16:52:47.295: ISDN Se0/2/0:15 Q931: RX <- RELEASE_COMP pd = 8 callref = 0x80AC
Cause i = 0x82D2 - Identified channel does not exist
Jan 31 16:52:54.675: ISDN Se0/0/0:15 Q931: Ux_DLRelInd: DL_REL_IND received from L2
DEL-2921-ROUTER(config)#
THANKS IN ADVANCE.....

Hi Rupesh,
The cause code "Idenfied channel does not exist" means:- This code indicates a call attempted on a channel that is not configured on the far end. This could happen if you are using a fractional PRI
Please ask to remote end for the number of channels configured and you can configure that number of channels accordingly at your end.
In CUCM 7.1 there is a service parameter which will help you to use the number of channel as per your requirement and rest of the channels you can mark it as busy so that CUCM won't select that channel.
Service Parameters > Call Manager > Advanced > CTRL-F > "maintenance"
In that you will find "Change B-Channel Maintenance Status" and mark channel as 1 which you don't want you to use.
For further information regarding this parameter you can click on that parameter and you will get more information.
And to enable above mentioned parameter, go to MGCP Gateway configuration page and check the box "Enable Status Poll"
Regards,
Nishant Savalia

Similar Messages

  • MGCP and H323 on one gateway

    I have a customer that is deploying CVP and as such needs H323 gateways. All of there current gateways are MGCP and they do not want to change that, and they don't want to have buy second gateways to support call center calls. In the SRND guide for CVP it states mgcp and h323 can be on one box, as long as h323 controls the trunks for cvp calls. I have never tried running mgcp and h323 at the same time. What pitfalls or limitations are there (srst?)

    I am doing this in a similar environment (cvp 3.1 with mgcp/h323 on the same box).
    The caveat of "as long as h323 controls the trunks for cvp calls" is pretty big though because the customer would have to have seperate pri's/t1 cas links just for inbound cvp calls.
    We have tested SRST and it works properly. MGCP falls back to h.323 and the inbound calls over that PRI (the pri controlled by MGCP) route properly. Inbound calls to the "CVP PRI" still routes calls properly (assuming you have alias's, num-exp, etc setup to handle these calls appropriately.)
    please rate helpful posts.
    adignan - berbee

  • 2.2.1 update and call issues

    Hi all,
    I was very happy with my iPhone and the 2.2 software update, things were running nicely and I hadn't had any troubles, which is why I decided to go ahead and install the 2.2.1 update when it was released - and I have had nothing but trouble...
    I live in an area where Vodafone coverage is not great, there are however certain areas where I can go to get almost full reception; this was the first problem that I noticed - I no longer get full reception here, it's now two or sometimes three bars.
    The second problem I have is when I go to make a phone call, when the call is establishing it now takes sometimes up to 40 seconds of silence to get to the ringtone! With 2.2 it almost seemed instantaneous, and now there is this massive delay which is infinitely infuriating!
    I think this second issue may be linked with the third, which is pretty much the opposite. When I end a call there is another long delay, though not normally as long as the setup delay - 15-20 seconds. Pressing the home button takes me back to the home screen with the green bar at the top saying the call is in progress, pressing the green bar takes me back to the call and allows me to press the end call button again, to no avail. All this whilst the call timer is still counting.
    The last issue is with the calls itself... Now when I make a call, about 50% of the time it will drop out in the first 30 seconds of the call, I will not get a call failed message (which I had seen a couple of times in the past); it will just sit there like the person on the other end of the phone has gone silent and the call timer will still be incrementing. This coupled with the call end and redial delays make for an almost 1 minute round trip from the call dropping out to me calling back - this is extremely infuriating!
    Now, I thought I could just roll back to the 2.2 update when everything was peachy... How wrong I was; it appears that the baseband has been altered in such a way with the 2.2.1 update that the 2.2 update cannot be restored to the phone, I've even gone to the lengths of jailbreaking the phone only to realise that the baseband cannot be rolled back, even if the firmware is.
    So, this puts me in a situation where I have an infuriating phone to use because I cannot roll back to the last known good update for it - it was reasons like these call issues that I moved away from Windows Mobile and Symbion devices. My iPhone was great until this update - I just want it back to good working order!
    I've tried restoring the phone, rebooting the phone, restoring to a 2.2 release (gives a #1013 error when trying to update it). Is there any way I can get this back - or is there a 2.2.2 release planned that will solve any of these issues?
    Cheers,
    --ryan

    Have you done a reset (hold the sleep/wake & home button until the Apple logo appears)? A reset will often correct many issues you may have with the phone.
    If a reset or restore does not correct the issues, you could try a new SIM from ATT or make an appointment at the Genius Bar to have the phone looked at.
    This is a user to user forum. No one here knows when or what the next update will contain.

  • VCSE with dual NIC / SIP H323 encrypted call / traversal and non-traversal call license questions

    Dear All,
    I have a few questions and I would appereciate if someone will answer my questions?
    1) May I know pros and cons of using Dual NIC and single NIC with VCSE in DMZ?
    2) In order to make H323 and SIP encrypted call, what configuration need to be done on Cisco endpoint, non-cisco endpoint, VCSC and VCSE (both signalling and Media need to be encrypted). 
    3)let say my VCSE is in DMZ- endpoint A (cisco) and endpoint  B (non-cisco) are registered on VCSE. I would like VCSE to use non-traversal call license when A call to B or B call to A regardless of whether H323 or SIP call.How can I force VCSE and endpoints to use non-traversal call. I only want VCSE to handle signalling and media is EP to EP direct. As traversal license is quite expensive.
    I found following information from Cisco document.
    all Cisco TelePresence endpoints are traversal enabled and so a traversal license will always be needed when at least one of the endpoints involved in the call is a Cisco TelePresence endpoint.
     Is it possible to disable traversal client feature of Cisco endpoint?
    Thanks and Best Regards,

    voice register pool  4
    add-->codec g711ulaw
    voice register global
    no create pro
    create prof
    and enable below debugs and send the logs
    deb ccsip mess
    deb voip ccapi inou
    deb h225 asn1
    deb h245 asn1

  • CAR/ART Billing for Off-Net and On-Net Calls

    Is there any possibility of differentiating between On-Net and Off-Net calls once the Rating engine has been configured?
    Within the CAR Dial-Plan the following destination patterns are configured 2XXX, 3XXX and classified as On-Net.
    The problem is that when you run a detailed report, calls between 2XXX and 3XXX display billing amounts, when only Off-Net calls are required for billing.

    Could be a codec issue. Verify what codec you are trying to use when the call fails.
    Is this H323 or MGCP, what is the PSTN connectivity, SIP or PRI or FX0?
    Might be helpful to post the router config.

  • Site to Site calling issue - Cisco 2911 Dial Peer Configuration

    My customer dials from remote site to main site to their main site number, the call by-passes their auto attendant and goes directly to any random available party. 
    At first fingers were pointing to the their PBX, however we noticed one of their sites that wasn't managed by our company did not have the issue.   We cut that site over to our service and the issue started right up.  I believe it is possibly due to the way the dial peers are configured and how the calls route into the PBX.  Unfortunately I do not understand much about them and curious to know if anyone has any history on a issue similiar to this or any input whatsoever?
    Cisco equipment/Dialpeer config below ........
    co IOS Software, C2900 Software (C2900-UNIVERSALK9-M), Version 15.2(4)M4, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2) - Cisco CISCO2911/K9
    dial-peer voice 100 voip
     description --- VoIP Dial-Peer ---
     translation-profile outgoing 7digit
     huntstop
     preference 1
     service session
     destination-pattern .T
     progress_ind setup enable 3
     session protocol sipv2
     session target sip-server
     incoming called-number .T
     voice-class codec 99  
     dtmf-relay rtp-nte
     fax-relay ecm disable
     fax rate 14400
     fax nsf 000000
     ip qos dscp af41 signaling
     no vad
    dial-peer voice 150 voip
     permission none
     description 900 block
     huntstop
     destination-pattern 1900T
     session protocol sipv2
     session target sip-server
     voice-class codec 99  
     dtmf-relay rtp-nte
     ip qos dscp af41 signaling
     no vad
    dial-peer voice 151 voip
     permission none
     description 900 block
     huntstop
     destination-pattern 900T
     session protocol sipv2
     session target sip-server
     voice-class codec 99  
     dtmf-relay rtp-nte
     ip qos dscp af41 signaling
     no vad
    dial-peer voice 101 pots
     description --- INCOMING Calls from PBX ---
     incoming called-number .T
     direct-inward-dial
    dial-peer voice 1001 pots
     description --- Calls to the PBX ---
     preference 3
     destination-pattern .T
     port 0/0/1:23
     forward-digits 4
    Here is some ISDN debug information
    BAD CALL
    Protocol Profile = Networking Extensions
    0xA11C0201420201008014484152545F20484F54454C535F434C4159544F4E
    Component = Invoke component
    Invoke Id = 66
    Operation = CallingName
    Name Presentation Allowed Extended
    Name = XXXXXXXXXXX
    Display i = ''XXXXXXXXXXX''
    Calling Party Number i = 0x2180, ''XXXXXXXXXX''
    Plan:ISDN, Type:National
    Called Party Number i = 0x80, ''6551''
    Plan:Unknown, Type:Unknown
    Aug 19 16:10:47.242 GMT: ISDN Se0/0/1:23 Q931: RX <- ALERTING pd = 8 callref = 0xAB15
    Channel ID i = 0xA98381
    Exclusive, Channel 1
    Aug 19 16:11:02.634 GMT: ISDN Se0/0/1:23 Q931: RX <- CONNECT pd = 8 callref = 0xAB15
    Channel ID i = 0xA98381
    Exclusive, Channel 1
    Aug 19 16:11:02.634 GMT: ISDN Se0/0/1:23 Q931: TX -> CONNECT_ACK pd = 8 callref = 0x2B15
    GOOD CALL
    Protocol Profile = Networking Extensions
    0xA116020144020100800E475245454E204D4F554E5441494E
    Component = Invoke component
    Invoke Id = 68
    Operation = CallingName
    Name Presentation Allowed Extended
    Name = XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
    Display i = ''XXXXXXXXXXX''
    Calling Party Number i = 0x2180, ''XXXXXXXXXX''
    Plan:ISDN, Type:National
    Called Party Number i = 0x80, 'XXXX''
    Plan:Unknown, Type:Unknown
    Aug 19 16:15:07.999 GMT: ISDN Se0/0/1:23 Q931: RX <- ALERTING pd = 8 callref = 0xAB17
    Channel ID i = 0xA98381
    Exclusive, Channel 1

    I done the configration via CCA  and the running conf i can see two voip dial peer. this is the site where all trunk line roured. Customer from other site2 needs to call outside by taking line from site1.
    dial-peer voice 2100 voip
    corlist incoming call-internal
    description **CCA*INTERSITE inbound call to SITE 1
    translation-profile incoming multisiteInbound
    incoming called-number 82...
    voice-class h323 1
    dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric
    fax protocol cisco
    no vad
    dial-peer voice 2101 voip
    corlist incoming call-internal
    description **CCA*INTERSITE outbound calls to SITE2
    translation-profile outgoing multisiteOutbound
    destination-pattern 81...
    session target ipv4:192.168.50.1
    voice-class h323 1
    dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric
    fax protocol cisco
    no vad
    no dial-peer outbound status-check pots

  • SRST in H323 and H323 Fallback

    Hello guys,
    Is it possible to have a branch with H323 Voice Gateway and H323 fallback, i just do not like MGCP, in other words instead of having an MGCP VGW with H323 fallback, i need an H323 VGW with H323 fallback.
    Regards,

    Tommer,
    Thank you for your feedback, so i can have an H323 VGW at branch, configure SRST on CUCM, register the IP Phones to the CUCM and upon WAN failure the IP Phones will fallback to the H323 VGW.
    I will configure a SIP trunk between the H323 VGW and the CUCM to make calls though the WAN.
    Regards,

  • My iphone 4S has problem in making and receiving the calls. While making the call , call fails and netwrok disappears. Like wise no voice is heard for incoming calls. This happened after return from the overseas travel.

    My iphone 4S has problem in making and receiving the calls. While making the call , call fails and netwrok disappears. Like wise no voice is heard for incoming calls. This happened after return from the overseas travel.

    Hello SamSax
    Check out the assist page below for troubleshooting call connectivity.
    Calls and connection issues
    http://www.apple.com/support/iphone/assistant/calls/
    Thanks for using Apple Support Communities.
    Regards,
    -Norm G.

  • Cisco Jabber for Windows in Extend and Connect mode and making outbound calls

    Hi guys,
    I've set up Cisco Jabber for Windows to use Extend and Connect to control a remote PBX endpoint. I've configured the required CTI-RD device, remote destinations, associated the users to the line and added the devices to end-user controlled device. The extend and connect part is working flawlessly without any issues. I'm able to receive inbound calls on the remote PBX endpoint and control the call (hold, resume, transfer etc.) using the Jabber call window that pops up.
    However, I'm unable to make any outbound calls via the Jabber client when in extend and Connect mode. Reading the Extend and Connect guide, I need to configure Dial Via Office (DVO) Reverse. So when the user initiates a Dial-Via-Office reverse call, CUCM calls and connect to the Extend and Connect device (CTI-RD). CUCM then calls and connects to the number the user dialled and finally connects the two call legs.
    After attempting to configure DVO-R for Jabber for Windows in Extend and Connect mode following the CUCM feature services guide, i'm unable to get any outbound calls working. From RTMT, i am receiving the following Termination Cause Code: (27) Destination out of order. What i also notice is that there is no calling number for that trace either. I would've thought that the calling party would've been the Enterprise Feature Access (EFA) number.
    Has anyone got this working or can provide some guidance?
    Thanks.

    Hi guys,
    I've set up Cisco Jabber for Windows to use Extend and Connect to control a remote PBX endpoint. I've configured the required CTI-RD device, remote destinations, associated the users to the line and added the devices to end-user controlled device. The extend and connect part is working flawlessly without any issues. I'm able to receive inbound calls on the remote PBX endpoint and control the call (hold, resume, transfer etc.) using the Jabber call window that pops up.
    However, I'm unable to make any outbound calls via the Jabber client when in extend and Connect mode. Reading the Extend and Connect guide, I need to configure Dial Via Office (DVO) Reverse. So when the user initiates a Dial-Via-Office reverse call, CUCM calls and connect to the Extend and Connect device (CTI-RD). CUCM then calls and connects to the number the user dialled and finally connects the two call legs.
    After attempting to configure DVO-R for Jabber for Windows in Extend and Connect mode following the CUCM feature services guide, i'm unable to get any outbound calls working. From RTMT, i am receiving the following Termination Cause Code: (27) Destination out of order. What i also notice is that there is no calling number for that trace either. I would've thought that the calling party would've been the Enterprise Feature Access (EFA) number.
    Has anyone got this working or can provide some guidance?
    Thanks.

  • Call issues on iPhone 4 after upgrading to IOS 5.1.1

    Ever since I upgraded to the IOS 5.1.1 my iPhone 4 has been having call issues. When I make or receive calls the other person can hear me for 5 seconds and then they can't hear me, but I can hear them. It is almost like the mute button is on, but I check it every time and it isn't on. I reset the factory settings, I reset the network settings and I checked the SIM card and nothing has fixed the problem. My phone has NEVER given me problems before and this is really frustrating. Anybody know what is causing this or how to fix it?? Please help!
    Thanks!

    Apple has not been forthcoming on the explanation. My Siri worked on my iphone4 (not 4s) immediately after upgrading to IOS5, but I take it they have redirected the servers that used to support Siri to only work with Iphone4s.
    It is one thing for apple to only bundle the improved Siri with IPhone 4S, or  for them to remove Siri from the Ap store.
    But it is another thing all together for apple to purchase a company, and then cease the service that many of us paid for.
    Attempts to contact apple at apple store and via email have been unhelpful.
    Apple Fan--

  • When I start firefox, i get this message ( The instruction at "0x7b9c77a9" referenced memory at "0x7b9c77a9". The memory could not be "read" ) hs anyone any idea why? I have scanned with AVG and something simply called 'Trojan Remover' and they both fin

    when I start firefox, i get this message ( The instruction at "0x7b9c77a9" referenced memory at "0x7b9c77a9". The memory could not be "read" ) hs anyone any idea why? I have scanned with AVG and something simply called 'Trojan Remover' and they both find nothing.... any advice would be greatly welcomed.. thanks
    == This happened ==
    Every time Firefox opened
    == this morning 22/07/10

    Lyall,
    I have seen this before, a long time ago (several years), and I cannot
    remember how/if we resolved it.
    If this is an impotant issue to you, I suggest that you open a case with
    BEA support.
    Regards,
    Peter.
    Got a Question? Ask BEA at http://askbea.bea.com
    The views expressed in this posting are solely those of the author, and BEA
    Systems, Inc. does not endorse any of these views.
    BEA Systems, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy or completeness of
    the
    information provided
    and assumes no duty to correct, expand upon, delete or update any of the
    information contained in this posting.
    Lyall Pearce wrote:
    The title says it all really.
    I see other posts getting replies.
    This is a rather important issue, I have seen another post with a similar problem.
    While not being a show-stopper it certainly raises concerns.
    The application works ok until the application exits (in both development and
    executable form)
    Apparently this did not happen with Tux 7.1
    It does with 8, I do not have 7.1 so I have no workaround.
    ..Lyall

  • Awful Customer service and handling of my issues

    Hi,
    Not quite sure where to begin but i would like someone to take notice of my concerns as it appears no one in the service center is. I have never received such a poor service and whats worse is that the information i have been given appears to be false.
    The issue started over a month, in november my ex partner bought me a brand new laptop from littlewoods, a G505s, the AMD quad core, ati 2GB graphics, supposedly the works, anyways after about a month it got really hot and then eventually the screen went blank and would not show any picture, so i contact Lenovo who arranged to collect the laptop and repair it.
    The laptop was received on the 17th of January in germany at there so called repair center, i called them each day to check the status and at first was told to wait the 10 days, then after the 10 days, ui was then told to wait 28 days, then two weeks after the initial contact i was told they would find out how long the parts would take to arrive and so fourth, this went on for weeks. Eventually after nearly four weeks, i was told the parts would take too long and so they would issue me with a returns code if i coudl provide proof of purchase. The problem is the laptop was apresent and my ex girlfreind was not playing ball so thinking that i would have to wait for the laptop to be returned, low and behold i come back from work and there we go, they returned the laptop UNREPAIRED.
    I received a document with it saying that they have diganosed the problem as the motherboard being faulty however they have so called resolved this issue by returning the laptop without being repaired, which i did not ask for them to do, i asked for it to be repaired or replaced under the warranty which they are legally obliged to.
    When i contacted LENOVO about this, i was put through to a rude senior supervisor who was very rude and unhelpful, stating that i had to provide this and when i tried to explain that i was unsatisfied that it had taken so long for this to get brought to my attention he claimed i was being abusive. I asked for an email address to email into and he refused to provide this, i asked to escalate the call, he refused. I think considering i have worked in customer services for over two years i know how these work and there are complaints procedures in which if a complain is not resolved then it gets escalated if the customer requires this however it appears Lenovo and this so called senior does not feel the same way.
    All i want is my laptop replaced or repaired, an email address to send my formal complaint about this member of staff and my outstanding issues resolved, as i was given [email protected]

    welcome to the BT community forum where customers help customers and only BT employees are the forum mods
    are you connected directly via a filter to the NTE5 master or test socket or to somewhere else? Is the master the only phone socket in your home?
    Have you tried the quiet line test? - dial 17070 option 2 - should hear nothing - best done with a corded phone. if cordless phone you may hear a 'dull hum' which is normal  if you hear noise then you need to report a phone fault to 151
    regardless of which ISP you use apart from cable the engineers will be exactly the same as all the lines are owned by openreach and treat all ISPs exactly the same
    Someone may then be able to offer help/assistance/suggestions to your problem
    If you like a post, or want to say thanks for a helpful answer, please click on the Ratings star on the left-hand side of the post.
    If someone answers your question correctly please let other members know by clicking on ’Mark as Accepted Solution’.

  • Incoming calls issue in Third Party SIP Phone

    Hi,
    Yesterday I configured my third party sip phone which is yealink in this case on cucm and successfully registered it with cucm, despite of registration i have some calling issue in this phone. I am able to make outbound calls from this phone to any other phone however issue is related to inbound calls.I tried calling its DN from anywhere but call disconnect after sometime. Also didnt get any proper sip session trace in RTMT. Kindly suggest some step to sortout this issue.
    Thanks

    Dear Manish,
    Call normally dicsonnected after 30-40 sec with termination code 102 in session trace. PFB SDI  trace with 5030 is Thirdparty sip phone and 5033 is c7945. Looking forward for your suggestion.
    CallingPartyNumber=5033
    |DialingPartition=
    |DialingPattern=5030
    |FullyQualifiedCalledPartyNumber=5030
    |DialingPatternRegularExpression=(5030)
    |DialingWhere=
    |PatternType=Enterprise
    |PotentialMatches=NoPotentialMatchesExist
    |DialingSdlProcessId=(0,0,0)
    |PretransformDigitString=5030
    |PretransformTagsList=SUBSCRIBER
    |PretransformPositionalMatchList=5030
    |CollectedDigits=5030
    |UnconsumedDigits=
    |TagsList=SUBSCRIBER
    |PositionalMatchList=5030
    |VoiceMailbox=
    |VoiceMailCallingSearchSpace=PT-LHR-LOCAL:PT-Local:Unityvmpt:PT-F6-Local:PT-ISL-LOCAL:PT-KHI-LOCAL:PT_Operator_LHR:PT_Operator_KHI:PT_Operator_ISL
    |VoiceMailPilotNumber=7103
    |RouteBlockFlag=RouteThisPattern
    |RouteBlockCause=0
    |AlertingName=Syed Ahmer
    |UnicodeDisplayName=Syed Ahmer
    |DisplayNameLocale=1
    |OverlapSendingFlagEnabled=0
    12:17:38.028 |//SIP/SIPUdp/wait_SdlSPISignal: Outgoing SIP UDP message to 172.16.200.21:[5062]:
    [23928282,NET]
    INVITE sip:[email protected]:5062 SIP/2.0
    Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.100.200.11:5060;branch=z9hG4bK1ca0cc6e317649
    From: "Syed Ahmer" ;tag=8787406~039e2a80-8561-4586-8954-d01ed2aa12c8-246211918
    To:
    Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 07:17:38 GMT
    Call-ID: [email protected]
    Supported: timer,resource-priority,replaces
    Min-SE:  1800
    User-Agent: Cisco-CUCM8.5
    Allow: INVITE, OPTIONS, INFO, BYE, CANCEL, ACK, PRACK, UPDATE, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY
    CSeq: 101 INVITE
    Expires: 180
    Allow-Events: presence
    Send-Info: conference, x-cisco-conference
    Alert-Info:
    Contact:
    Remote-Party-ID: "Syed Ahmer" ;party=calling;screen=yes;privacy=off
    Max-Forwards: 70
    Content-Length: 0
    |14,100,50,1.14103336^10.163.14.4^SEP00230432C828
    12:17:38.028 |EnvProcessUdpPort - EnvProcessUdpHandler::fireSignal() varId = 0|14,100,50,1.14103336^10.163.14.4^SEP00230432C828
    12:17:38.028 |EnvProcessUdpHandler::fireSignal - SEND: index = 0, handler = 0xaf299320|*^*^*
    12:17:38.028 |EnvProcessUdpPort::fireSignal - SEND, destination = 172.16.200.21:5062|*^*^*
    12:17:38.028 |EnvProcessUdpPort - EnvProcessUdpHandler::send(buff, 850, 172.16.200.21:5062)|*^*^*

  • Photoshop Elements 11 installed on Mac Mini OS X 10.9.5. Application running successfully on bot main user and administrative accounts for considerable time with no warning messages. When established a new user account on same computer and try to call up

    Photoshop Elements 11 installed on Mac Mini OS X 10.9.5. Application running successfully on bot main user and administrative accounts for considerable time with no warning messages. When established a new user account on same computer and try to call up elements receive message “Some ot the application components are missing from the Application directory. Please reinstall the application.” How do I correct this problem without disturbing application in main user account?

    Brooks lansing if you create a new Administrator account does the same issue occur?  If so then it is likely that there is a file permission failure and file permissions have been set for the existing Users instead of the groups they belong to.
    Have you removed and reinstalled Photoshop Elements 11?  This may reset the file permissions to the correct state to allow it to work under new accounts.

  • PP CC 2014 and AE CC 2014 issues an nMacPro

    My frustration with the combination of Adobe and the new MacPro grows. I’ve posted in here before and everyone has been helpful, I’m hoping you can help shed some light once more. First I’ll explain the issue then let you know how the system is arranged.
    Issue 1: PP CC 2014 and AE CC 2014 seem to be struggling with each other. Renders in PP take an extreme amount of time if AE is open. Once closing AE, PP will increase render speed by at least 4x-6x faster (no exact calculation, it gets a lot faster).  Dynamic Link between the two is really poor performance. Basic text titles with keyframed opacity changes in AE Dynamically Linked to PP, take forever to render. This is not heavy lifting or anything crazy effects or 3rd party plugins. Basic text. Again, if I close AE, the render speed increases. This is obviously not a good workflow. The reason our studio switched back to PP three years ago, was the improved workflow of Dynamic Link across Adobe products. This is proven to get worse, at least in the case of the new MacPro and CC 2014.
    Issue 2: When editing in PP, often times the program stops playing back anything. You can scrub the time indicator, but no video plays and no audio plays. It hangs. Pressing the space bar or selecting the play key does nothing. The only way to get the program to react is a restart. This is on a timeline with one or two 1920 x 1080 video sources. Not heavy lifting for a program that boasts about playing native 6K footage. This is a more recent development.
    With both issues presenting themselves in different projects, it is not isolated rot a single project that may have been corrupted. I have switched Mercury Playback to software only. It does help somewhat, but not nearly enough to call it a workaround for now. The frustrating part is this problem does not exist on 2011 MacBookPro. That is extremely frustrating given the NMB costs 10x what a new MacBookPro would’ve cost.
    The setup: New Mac Pro 2.7 Ghz 12-core  64GB RAM  Dual D700 Graphics Cards  1TB internal flash drive. OSX 10.9.4. Adobe CC 2014 stored on internal drive. Project is stored and playing from a 1TB (Journaled) Seagate drive connected through the following: Thermaltake dock esata connection to a Sonnet Tempo Sata Pro 6GB Express Card in a Sonet Echo ExpressCard Pro Thunderbolt adapter connect via Thunderbolt to the nMP.
    RAM allocated to Adobe products is 52GB with 12GB remaining for “other” system essentials. Scratch disks are set to the project disk so all media and scratch disks stay together. We typically work on 3-4 projects at a time, this setup allows us to keep track of everything.
    The above setup and issues are present on the nMP. Compared to a 2011 MBP 2.3 Ghz core i7  8GB RAM  AMD Radeon 670M 1024MB graphics card. OSX 10.8.5. The MBP is connected to the drive via the Sonnet esata card and shows no signs of issue 1 or issue 2.
    Any thoughts and suggestions on how to help these issues are greatly appreciate. I’ll even take general comments on how to make the system better. Currently the nMP is an expensive paper weight and Adobe is losing my confidence in PP.

    This is not an answer but an addition to this problem. I am not trying to hijack but i feel my issues are very similar to what BMercer was having.
    I just recently bought the new mac pro with 500gb ssd internal , 6 core, 64gb ram and dual d700s.
    I upgrade and purchased CC after i was pretty well convinced that CC was the way to go for this computer as opposed to CS6.
    Fo how much i spent on this new computer and new CC subscription i feel this should be functioning better.
    I have noticed when i have very basic files on the timeline(1920x1080, no effects) they are still dropping frames or i cannot scrub through them smoothly. As mentioned by BMercer for a machine capable of handling 6k these DSLR files should be pretty simple.
    I am trying to do a time lapse for a client and I am having extremely slow load times. This is more difficult but i still believe it should be loading way faster then this.
    About 2000 frames of raw DSLR photos simply compiled in AE then opened the sequences in PP and placed them into the timeline. This is taking about 45-60min to render the timeline. I have to do this because scrubbing or trying to play goes nowhere.
    This i could accept as well except for when i look at the stats of the computer in the activity monitor and Istats the CPU maintains a 60-70% idle, the GPU stays very low and the max ram combined usage is about 15gb(memory pressure doesn't even show on the graph). So I would assume from this there is nothing i can see that is "holding" the computer back.
    I have the exact same MBP as BMercer and i am having far less issues with doing the exact same files rendered from a relatively slow thunderbolt external drive.
    Is this a setting issue? Or is this something we can expect to see an update to?
    Sorry again for tagging below you but i felt our issue and answers may be similar.

Maybe you are looking for

  • B/W G3 and OSX

    Have a B/W G3 with an OEM hard drive (IBM Model DTTA-351290 E182115 HG) running System 9. Could not get OS 10.3 to install properly (always froze a quarter of the way through installation). Removed the hard drive and put in in a G4. Then installed 10

  • Can I stream from my apple tv to another apple device?

    My TV speakers are bad...really bad.  I use a Bose Sound Dock to listen to music with my ipod and iphone but I would love to use it as sound from my tv.  Due the the Sound Dock only having aux in v. sereo in, I think my only option is to stream to th

  • How to extract files in terminal[solved]

    im trying to install themes and when i download the file i need to extract it and unless i switch to root in terminal i dont have permission to extract it to /usr/share/themes. so what code do i need to use tto exract files in terminal? Last edited b

  • With new Brightbox2 router and fibre broadband, PC not shutting down on request

    Yesterday connected to fibre broadband with new Brightbox2 router. Since then have been unable to Shut Down PC, although can select Sleep OK. Also cannot access System Manager via Ctrl-Alt-Del.

  • Stop auto-release of a closed BPA

    How can we stop auto-release of a closed BPA?