MIRO ERROR _ REG

MIGO completed for two line items on 23.01.2010.  Later it appears that VAT code was changed from V1 to V6 (both being non-deductible tax codes) on 30.01.2010 when I saw the po and went to environment and saw the item changes.  The item is not in stock and it is issued.  Now while doing miro system is throwing message Price Difference Account (difference between V1 and V6 amount) requires an assignment to a CO Object.  The cost center is greyed out in MIRO.  How to overcome this problem?

Hi,
You have to enter the default cost center in the cost element master data of price diff GL account.
or either you can have the same kind of setting in OKB9 also.
This will fix your issue
Thanks,
Srinu

Similar Messages

  • Integration MIRO error, how to determine the VST related accounts.

    integration Miro error.
    Hi gurus,
    please resolve the problem urgent.
    while doing MIRO Iam getting the following error.
    after given PO number in MIRO I getting the following error. please how to resolve the problem.
    where i can determin the accounts, which accounts will be effect.
    Error in account determination: table T030K key ASHA VST V0
    Message no. FF709
    Diagnosis
    In the chart of accounts to be posted to, no accounts are defined for the tax code you used.
    Procedure
    Contact your system administrator.
    Define the accounts to which a tax posting is to be made with the tax code entered in Customizing for taxes on sales/purchases.
    To do this, choose Maintain entries (F5).
    How to determine VST

    I have already replied to the same question in one of ur earlier posts.
    If you want to knowthe GL accounts which are used presently for the transaction VST, you can go to table T030K give the field name KTOSL value as VST and execute. YOu will get the list of all GL accounts which use the transaction VST for all possible tax codes and Chart of Accounts.

  • Miro Error in account determination: table T030 key PCOA KDT

    WHEN USER IS USING MIRO WITH CREDIT MEMO.HE GOT FOLLORING ERRO.
    ERROR MESSAGE IS AS FOLLOWS
    Error in account determination: table T030 key PCOA KDT
    Message no. FF709
    Diagnosis
    In the chart of accounts to be posted to, no accounts are defined for the tax code you used.
    Procedure
    Contact your system administrator.
    Define the accounts to which a tax posting is to be made with the tax code entered in Customizing
    for taxes on sales/purchases.
    To do this, choose Maintain entries (F5).
    Miro Error in account determination: table T030 key PCOA KDT

    Dear Venkat
    actually we have only one currency that is INR and last month also we have posted same but no error.KDT Is not suppose to maintain as per discussion with client.
    if select with out tax code its posting now.No error from that1
    NOTE:And 1 more imp thing in MIRO if i select calculate tax button automatically tax amount cloum is closing. i am not able to visable
    let me know any possibilities
    Edited by: sumathi lakshmi on Feb 20, 2009 6:33 AM
    Edited by: sumathi lakshmi on Feb 20, 2009 7:36 AM
    Edited by: sumathi lakshmi on Feb 20, 2009 1:07 PM

  • MIRO : Error message for a duplicate entry

    Hi,
    When we enter In MIRO an invoice with the same informations as another invoice that was already posted, the system display a Warning message like the following :
    Message no. F5117
    Check whether document has already been entered with number 1900000008 2009
    Please how to make this message as an Error message ?
    Regards.

    Hi,
    Use tcode OBA5.  Give application area as F5 and press enter. Once inside,  go to new entries, and in message no. type 117.  give E against online and batch and press enter.  then save.
    AshFICO

  • While creating miro error message posting date 009 2011is not open

    sir
    while creating miro the error message is not open open for the posting date 009 2011

    Hi,
    The date format you have mentioned 009 2011 won't be supported by SAP system. Please enter it in correct format. If the format is OK an not working means MM posting periods are not open for this month this error will come.In MMPV give company code and specify the period to close  and save.Again go to same transaction open the period for this month. I hope this will resolve your issue. Thanking you.
    Edited by: Padmasri Garapati on Sep 16, 2011 6:58 AM

  • MIRO error

    Hi
    While posting a MIRO invoice, I am getting the following error:
    Account has been set as not relevant for tax"
    Can someone please help me in understanding this issue?
    I appreciate your help.

    Hi Eric
    Thanks for your reply. I have checked this account and as expected, it does not allow for the tax postings. In order to make it do so, I need to set it up for Tax category and if we need to allow postings without tax code then, I need to check the Postings without tax allowed also. Please let me know if I am on the right track.
    I appreciate your help.
    Thanks,
    Shalu

  • MIRO Error due to Quality Reason

    Hi All,
    Suppose there are 3 GRs of different date of same material. Out of which for 1st GRs quality Inspection has been done and rest 2 GRs are not. Account has received the 3 Bills from vendor for 3 GRs separatly.
    when Account tries to Execute MIRO for 1st GRs for which quality Inspection has been done.
    system is not allowing me to Post MIRO, Generating Error Message for quality reason.
    Why system generating error while posting MIRO for quality Inspection clear for 1st GRs.
    please help me...
    manoj singh

    Hello,
    Please look into this,
    If you set this indicator, the payment of the invoice is blocked with blocking reason I (I = Inspection), if you want to prevent automatic payment of the invoice from a QM standpoint.If this indicator is set, when the invoice is created, the system determines whether an inspection lot exists and if necessary, sets blocking reason I. This occurs in the following instances:
    1) There is still no usage decision for the inspection lot
    2) The inspection lot is rejected
    The automatic payment program checks whether the blocking reason I still exists. The following scenarios can occur:
    Invoice verification takes place with reference to the goods receipt.If there are several partial deliveries for an order item, the system checks for each GR item whether blocking reason I exists. This means that automatic payment of the invoice is only prevented for partial deliveries that do not fulfill requirements.
    Invoice verification takes place without reference to the goods receipt.
    If there are several partial deliveries for an order item, the system only checks with reference to the order item whether blocking reason I exists. This means that automatic payment of the invoice is prevented, if one or more GR items does not fulfill requirements.
    The system does not automatically remove blocking reason I, if an acceptance decision is made for the inspection lot concerned. You must remove blocking reason I at invoice verification or invoice release. To do this, set the indicator Release invoices automatically when releasing invoices.
    If you only want to pay invoices, when the quality management process has accepted goods or waived a goods receipt inspection, you must ensure that invoices are not entered before goods receipt. You do this by planning GR-based invoice verification for the relevant vendors.
    Please revert with your feedback
    Regards
    Gajesh

  • MIRO error Posting with trans.type 159 not possible (No acquisition posted)

    Hi,
    I have the following probem while doing MIRO.  Would appreciate if someone could help.
    Error in Purchase invoice posting MIRO  :-
    The user has created a PO for asset in  FY2010 and has performed a MIGO in FY2010.
    Now in FY2011 the user tries to  invoice against the  above asset and wants to post it thru Trans MIRO.
    System gives an  error during MIRO  "Posting with trans.type 159 not possible (No acquisition posted)"  Message no AA 324
    Trans type 159 has trans type group 12 attached to it.
    MIGO can not be reversed  because it belongs to the closed FY.
    Please help

    Hi
    refer notes 1526247 and 1507808... Though it relates to Japan, but the issue is same
    Br, Ajay M

  • PLEASE RESOLVE THE MIRO ERROR

    Hi gurus,
    please resolve the problem urgent.
    while doing MIRO Iam getting the following error.
    after given PO number in MIRO I getting the following error. please how to resolve the problem.
    Error in account determination: table T030K key ASHA VST V0
    Message no. FF709
    Diagnosis
    In the chart of accounts to be posted to, no accounts are defined for the tax code you used.
    Procedure
    Contact your system administrator.
    Define the accounts to which a tax posting is to be made with the tax code entered in Customizing for taxes on sales/purchases.
    To do this, choose Maintain entries (F5).
    where i can determin the accounts, which accounts will be effect.
    Thank you & Regards
    Anil

    Dear Anil,
    Go to the transaction code FTXP. Give the country code and then the tax code.
    Now on the top, there would be a tab for the "Accounts". Click on it and for the chart of accounts, give the GL accounts.
    Alternatively, go to OB40, for the accounting key V0, give the GL accounts.
    Assign points if useful.
    Regards
    Venkatesh

  • MIRO error please resolve the problem

    Hi gurus,
    please resolve the problem urgent.
    while doing MIRO Iam getting the following error.
    after given PO number in MIRO I getting the following error. please how to resolve the problem.
    Error in account determination: table T030K key ASHA VST V0
    Message no. FF709
    Diagnosis
    In the chart of accounts to be posted to, no accounts are defined for the tax code you used.
    Procedure
    Contact your system administrator.
    Define the accounts to which a tax posting is to be made with the tax code entered in Customizing for taxes on sales/purchases.
    To do this, choose Maintain entries (F5).
    where i can determin the accounts, which accounts will be effect.
    Thank you & Regards
    Anil

    Hi,
    You have to maintain the GL accounts for the correct combination of country, tax code, chart of accounts etc in the tcode FTXP for the transaction VST.
    I hope either the transaction VST or the tax code V0 was newly added
    You can get the correct GL account by askign the person who has initiated this change. May be your FI team member also can help.
    T030K is the table which gets updated while you maintain teh entries through FTXP tcode.
    Hope this helps you

  • MIRO Error - Balancing field "Profit Center" in line item 001 not filled

    Dear Experts,
    Recently we upgraded to ECC 6.0 from 4.6C. We implemented new GL functionality.
    We have also introduced new Profit Centers and have updated the same in Material Master.
    Now, the new Profit Centers are valid from 01.04.2009 till 31.12.9999.
    Now my problem is while doing MIRO after 31.03.2009 for old PO's i.e. the PO's which were created before 01.04.2009 the system gives me error "Balancing field "Profit Center" in line item 001 not filled".
    This is because for the particular line item it picks the profit center from material master, but the validity of that (NEW) profit center is from 01.04.2009 whereas I want to do the posting in back date i.e. for eg. 28.03.2009. Due to which it does not get any profit center.
    How do I resolve this problem. Is there any exit or BADI to do the same.
    Regards...

    Hi
    There could be multiple reasons for this. Pls check on:
    1. For the Expense Account assigned in DIF, have u made the assignment for deriving Profit Center & Business Area in T Code OKB9
    2. Ask your FI Consultant to check the Splitting Characteristics for the MIGO. Check the Splitting Characteristics assigned to the Accounting Document Type assigned to T Code MIGO. Also check if all the GL Accounts have been assigned a splitting characteritics. The path is:
    IMG> Financial Accounting(New)>General Ledger Accounting (New)>Business Transactions>Document Splitting
    3. Do you maintain profit center as a default in material Master? If yes, check if the same has been assigned in the view extended for the plant concerned?
    Pls check the settings. If any doubt, revert back.
    Thanks & Best Regards,
    rahul.

  • MIRO Error-Can not post to mat.account & using overhead cost centre &.

    Dear Colleagues,
    On MIRO,users have come across this error where they can not post to a particular G/L account using 2 different cost centres(219 & 220).
    We have some validations on OB28 but although one particular step menitons this message as I stated above,the prerequisite of that step seem to be referring to G/L IN VAL_Plant No_16 AND Cost Center IN VAL_Plant No_17.
    Whereabouts I need to maintain this G/L account/Cost Centre Combination?II had a look at OME9/OKB9 but couldn't get any resolution looking over there...
    All Help appreciated.
    PAPJ1.

    I had to tweak the types  of error messages on OB28 temporarily,to allow for these postings to go through and it worked!.
    PAPJ1

  • MIRO Error -Error Message # FF716

    Hi,
    We are in the process of Upgrading from 4.6C to ECC 5.0. Our Client based in US has two company codes - one of US and other of Canada.
    When we are trying to do MIRO in the  Canadian Company code, while posting to an Asset - Account Assignment Category A, we are getting an error message FF716, and the error message reads as follows.
    <b>Error in assigning the tax group
    Message no. FF716</b>
    <b>Diagnosis</b>
    To guarantee a connection between the automatically created tax items, the initiating line items, and the tax information used for reporting, a unique code is assigned to the line items belonging together. An error occurred during this assignment.
    <b>Procedure</b>
    Contact your system administrator.
    Procedure for System Administration
    Create an OSS message.
    MIRO works fine for the American Company code.
    Can you please guide me how do I resolve this issue?

    Hi
    I would suggest you to check the GL accounts that are involved in this transaction. If those GL accounts are Tax relevant GL accounts please give the Tax Code in the line item (even the 0% tax code) so that the system will not issue such error. There is a function module CREATE_BSET_ITEM which will check whether tax code exist in the line items or not, if the same is not available then it will issue this error message.
    Also as suggested by other friend please check the OBCL for the default tax code assignment for asset accounting.
    Hope this should help you.
    Regards
    Nambi

  • VL10B  error WITH REG STO .

    Hi all,
      well configuring STO btvn 2plants  within co code.
       IMG config :
    doc" ub " suplying plant 2345 , del doc .
    nl  and chking rule 02 "
    suplyng plant & recving plant assignd to UB "
    IN me23  display P.O ,suppying & receving plant details are accurate with order quantity.
    well ,  in the delivery schedule tab of STO (me21n), del date is projected as 25.06.2008 & committed date is 25.06.2008 with committed qty 20.
    ERROR :
    And in vl10b considering the cal rul for del " 2" today & tommorow. and with input of p.o number stl the delivery no is not projetced.
    checked co09, stock is avaliable in plant & strg loc.CHECKING RULE DEFINED IN MM01 ,02 IND REQ.
    picking location has been determined.
    But stl the devilery no not being triggered in vl10b, moreover no error log shown in vl1ob.
    could  anyone pl guide , stl any config 2b completed  in MM .
    Thanks,
    Jerry.

    Hi,
    In VL10B transaction remove the calculation rule for delivery and check whether you are able to create outbound delivery or not ?
    Hve you assigned the shipping point to the plant and shipping data to the plant in STO configuration ?
    Hope its clear.
    reg
    Durga
    *assign points if the info is useful

  • MIRO - Error of 2 MIRO for 1 MIGO

    Dear Friends,
    At the time of the creation of a MIRO document, the amount and the quantity are automatically populated on entering the PO number. Once the MIRO is done the entry is posted debiting the GR/IR account and crediting the vendor.
    If I once again go to MIRO and give the PO reference, a line appears but without the amount and the quantity. Here the user is able to enter some amount and some quantity and is able to once again save the entry. Is there any way of avoiding this double entry in MIRO stage. Can we set any error message telling that since there is no MIGO, MIRO cannot be done.
    regards
    Venkatesh

    Hi,
    Pls check the vendor master data, payment transactions account view (T_code XK02).In this view, there is check box as check double invoice where in u can set for avoiding double entry in MIRO.
    May it help to u.
    Best regards,
    Goraksh Dhikale.

Maybe you are looking for

  • LSMW-logical path not specified

    Hi experts, I am doing an LSMW object for purchasing info records conversion. In the step "specify files" i am not able to save wat i have done cos i am getting an error 'No logical path has been specified' .I have choosed the file from PC-Frontend.

  • IE 9, Windows 7, Windows 8, SHA-2 encryption, certificate

    Currently, I have I have an Exchange 2010 Service with 2 client access/ transport servers and 2 mailbox servers.  I use a barracuda load balance appliance to manage the CASarray.   Our SSL certificate for the service is currently SHA-1.  I would like

  • Increase in Inventory value of raw material after PO stage & MIRO

    Is it possible to increase the inventory value of a raw material after PO is finalized and MIRO doc. has been raised. I want to increase the inventory value by additional expenses after PO & MIRO are done. Regards,

  • Can I measure pulswidths with daqmx base and NI-USB6501

    Can I measure pulswidths with daqmx base 1.4 and NI-USB6501? I can measure edges width this function: DAQmxBaseCreateCICountEdgesChan. But, when using DAQmxBaseCreateCIPulseWidthChan I always get an error message back (DAQmxBase Error: <err>Value pas

  • Creating a DNS Server on Oracle Linux 5.8 64 bit

    Hi Guys, I am creating a DNS host setup to resolve the SCAN IPs used in Oracle 11g R2 RAC. The Idea is to resolve 3 IP addres in a round robin fashion. I am not a hard core linux admin just a DBA. Please help me get a pointer to troubleshoot this iss